Chapter 5 SRK
Chapter 5 SRK
❑Impact Assessment
➢It refers to the identification and evaluation of environmental changes
occurring as a result of implementing a project.
CLASSIFICATION OF IMPACTS
1
3/18/2023
5. Health •Results in the chances of vector diseases like cholera due to unmanaged
2. Chemical impact •Relates to a chemical change in the quality of the ambient air,
Impact sanitation from the establishment of labor camps for the project
water or soil caused by project activities e.g. untreated effluent •Chances of spread of pandemic diseases like COVID-19 from the influx
discharged directly into a river by a factory may change the of outside labors to the project area
chemical characteristics of the river
2
3/18/2023
3
3/18/2023
4
3/18/2023
5
3/18/2023
➢It provides a framework for interaction between project activities and their ➢Preliminary identification of impacts (scoping)
environmental impacts. ➢Comparative analysis of alternatives.
➢It can evaluate degree of impacts of project activities on environmental ➢Impact assessment.
resources.
➢Presentation of evaluation results.
➢It is a grid like table that one axis displayed project activities and other axis
displayed environmental characteristics.
➢It can also evaluate the cumulative and indirect impacts as well as
interaction with resources.
➢Observed as a two dimensional checklist:
✓Axis of actions
✓Axis of environmental components.
✓The intersections are the impacts.
❑Simple Matrix
➢It is simply a list of environmental aspects listed along the
vertical axis. Against which we determine whether an
activity would have an adverse effect, no effect or
beneficial effect.
➢A simple “x” or “tick” is given under the appropriate
column.
➢Sometimes, the activities are listed along the horizontal
axis with the environmental aspects in the vertical axis,
and the same “x” is given to those pairs that have an
interaction between themselves.
6
3/18/2023
7
3/18/2023
OVERLAY METHOD
Advantages and Disadvantages of Network Method ➢It is based upon a set of transparent maps.
➢Each represent the spatial distribution of an environmental characteristics.
Advantages Disadvantages
➢The set of transparent maps have information about physical, social,
Link action to impact. Can become overly(very) complex if ecological, aesthetic characteristics of the project area and after
used beyond simplified version. overlapping to produce a composite characterization of the regional
environment.
Useful in simplified form in checking for Qualitative
second order impacts. ➢Older technique: environmental features are mapped on transparent plastic
in different colors.
➢Newer Technique: Geographic Information Systems (GIS).
Handles direct and indirect impacts.
46
8
3/18/2023
51
52 53
54
9
3/18/2023
Impact Prediction
Types of Impact prediction methods
A. Extrapolative Approach B. Normative methods 1. Mathematical models
2. Statistical models
3. Geographic models
➢Predictions are made on the • Normative methods examine how 4. Field and experimental methods
basis of past and present data, the fulfillment of a desired target is 5. Physical models
trend or scenario. achieved. 6. Expert judgement
Have to fulfill (almost all if possible) the following objectives : Such models/methods
should
➢It include trend and scenario • Prediction by setting targets e.g. if 1. Produce acceptable results
analysis (the common sense in one construction project, a target 2. Be replicable
forecast of the future), analogies set is to employ 50% of the local 3. Be consistent
(transferring experience from populace. Meeting this target, may 4. Be adoptable.
elsewhere), and intuitive forecast require changing the project and 5. Be simple to use
from group consensus. associated employment policy 59
3. Mass Balance : Primarily useful for predicting impacts from industries and manufacturing sectors.
60
10
3/18/2023
MATHEMATICAL MODEL
2.Statistical model
➢Statistical analysis are used to indicate the relationship between the data and test
hypothesis.
➢Statistical techniques such as regression or component analysis are used to establish
cause and effect relationships
➢For example in predicting flood frequencies.
63
➢Such an impact would lead to decline of the fish population in the u/s of the dam unless
migration is planned to deal with the problem.
64 65
5. Physical Models
Types of Uncertainties in Impact Prediction 34
• Closely liked to the field and laboratory experiments. Application of
similar condition on models.
• Basically, a model of an area likely to be impacted is constructed but on a smaller Scientific Uncertainty: Data uncertainty: Policy uncertainty:
scale limited understanding of Incomplete unclear or
➢For example: the exposure of fish in a laboratory to concentrations of pollutants to ecosystem or community information/insufficient disrupted objectives
determine mortality levels affected methodology or standards
➢Field trials of the effectiveness of different methods of erosion control.
11
3/18/2023
Impact Evaluation
Impact Evaluation provides useful information to decision makers for selecting appropriate choice. Once ➢ Can be of various types including formal, informal, quantitative or qualitative and,
the impacts are predicted, there is need to assess their relative significance/insignificance/non -significance, aggregated or disaggregated.
Called Evaluation.
➢ The most formal method is the comparison of likely impacts against legal
Criteria for significance include: EVALUATION OF IMPACTS
➢ Magnitude requirements and standards such as air quality and water quality thresholds, building
➢ Likelihood of impacts codes etc.
➢ Spatial and temporal extent, ➢ Beyond this, the evaluation involves interpretation and application of judgment.
➢ Likely degree of recovery of affected environment Significance of assessment may be based on factors such as:
➢ Value of affected environment
➢ Consideration to impact characteristics such as magnitude, geographic extent,
➢ Level of public concerns
➢ Political repercussions duration, reversibility
➢ Comparison with accepted standard, e.g. Dissolved oxygen level, noise level, etc
The evaluation is an attempt to answer whether or not the predicted changes and its consequences are ➢ Legal provisions such as protected species, or features
significant enough to matter. Evaluation of impacts should be based on comparing the values against set ➢ Public sensitivity and social, cultural, economic implications,
standards
➢ Ecological functions and importance
➢ Professional intuitive judgment of potential implications.
➢In order to determine the significance of impacts, impact ➢A sum of the impact values for magnitude, extent , duration provides a maximum
ranking methodology shall be used which helps to compare the of 140 and a minimum of 25.
relative environmental impacts of a project. ➢This type of ranking methodology is useful for comparing different project
alternatives.
Magnitude Extent Duration ➢The impact values or scores for each of the alternatives are summed up and
multiplied by the probability of occurrence for the particular impact.
High/ 60 Regional 60 Long 20 ➢The final impact scores for all alternatives can be compared and highest value
Major Term corresponds to the greatest potential for environmental impact.
72 73
12
3/18/2023
Necessity of Numerical Calculation Of Impact 5.4.1 Numerical on impact prediction and Evaluation
infrastructure and industry producing civil engineering material like cement , Brick , 1. BOD problem of sewage in rever
1.1 Final BOD after mixing of sanitary of two or multipal BOD in rever
which cause pollution in environment so mathematical analysis should be done for 1.2 critical DO and its time and location
sustainable development 2. Soil erosion problem
3. Distance up to which smoke of chimney affect
74 75
01
76 77
Factors Affecting self Purification Different equation for critical BOD calculation
Oxidation
𝐾𝐿0
1. Dt = [10-KT - 10-RT] + D0 * 10-Rt
Reduction Dilution 𝑅−𝐾
𝐾
2. Dc = 𝑅 L0 10 –kt c
4. Xc = V*tc
Sedimentation
Sunlight 𝐷
[𝑓𝐿0𝐷 ](fs -1) =[ fs ( 1-(fs-1) 0 ]
𝑠 L0 79
11
13
3/18/2023
A stream saturated with DO has a flow of 1.5 m3/s ,BOD 4 mg/lit and rate constant (K1) of 0.1 per day A stream saturated with DO has a flow of 1.5 m3/s ,BOD 4 mg/lit and rate constant (K1) of 0.1 per day . It Receive an
. It Receive an effluent discharge of 0.5 m3/s having BOD 20 mg/lit and DO 5 mg/lit . The average effluent discharge of 0.5 m3/s having BOD 20 mg/lit and DO 5 mg/lit . The average velocity of flow of stream is 0.2
velocity of flow of stream is 0.2 m/sec . The average depth of stream is 1.2 m . Calculate DoO deficit m/sec . The average depth of stream is 1.2 m . Calculate DoO deficit at 30 KM downstream . Assume temperature
at 30 KM downstream . Assume temperature throughout 20 0C and BOD is measured in d days . The throughout 20 0C and BOD is measured in d days . The saturation DO at 20 0C as 9.17 mg/lit
saturation DO at 20 0C as 9.17 mg/lit
Solution Solution
Dostream = 9.17 mg/lit Dosewage = 5 mg/lit 9.17∗1.5+20∗0.5
2) Domix = = 8.1275 mg/lit
Qstream = 1.5 Qsewage = 0.5 1.5+0.5
Rate costant (K1 ) = 0.1 per day DO deficit at 30 KM = ? 3) Initial DO deficit (D0 ) = 1.0425 mg/lit
Velocity of flow (v) = 0.2 m/s 4) BODmix = L0(1-10-kt )
Depth of flow (H) = 1.2 m Bed coefficient (ղ) = 0.1( taken ) 8 = L0(1-10-0.12*5)
L0 = 10.68 mg/lit
𝑉 0.2
1) Kd = K + ղ= 0.1 + ∗ 0.1 = 0.12 per day and , ( 6) At Xt =30 KM
𝐻 1.2 𝑋 30∗1000
t= = = 1.736 days
𝑉 𝑉0.2∗24∗3600
𝑉 0.2
. = 3.9
Rr = 3.9
1.21 5= 1.33 per day
.
𝐻1 5
Q.1 A town discharge 120 m3/sec of sewage into a river having a rate of flow 1600 m3/sec, during lean period with a
Using streterphelp’s equation, velocity 0.1 m/sec . The day BOD of sewage at the given temperature is 250 mg/lit . Find the amount of critical DO deficit
and when and where it will occur in the downstream of the river . Assume deoxygenation costant ‘k’ as 0.1 per day and
𝐾𝐿 coefficient of self purification fs as 3.5 . Saturation DO at given temperature is 9.2 mg/lit
Dt = 𝑅−𝐾0 [10-kt- 10-Rt] + Do*10-Rt
Solution
82 83
𝐷𝑂𝑠∗𝑄𝒔+𝐷𝑂𝒓∗𝑄𝑟
1) Domix = 5) Time of critical DO deficit
𝑄𝒔+𝑄𝑟
0∗120+9.2∗1600
=
120+160 tc=
1
𝑘(𝑓𝑠−1)
log10 [ f {1-( f -1)𝐷𝐿 }]
s s
o
o
= 8.56 mg/lit
2) initial Do deficit (Do) = Dos –DOmix = 9.2-8.56 = 0.64 mg/lit =
1
log10 [ 3.5 {1-( 3.5 -1)
0.64
}]
0.1(3.5−1) 25.508
3) BODmix =
𝐵𝑂𝐷𝑠∗𝑄𝑠+𝐵𝑂𝐷𝑟∗𝑄𝑟
=
250∗120+0∗1600
=17.442 mg/lit
2.064 days
tc =
𝑄𝑠+𝑄𝑟 120+1600
6) Critical DO deficit
BODmix = Lo (1-10-kt ) 1 1
Dc = 𝑓 Lo 10-k*tc = 3.5*25.508* 10-0.1*2.064 = 4.532 mg/lit
c
( Where, k=0.1 per day and t=5 day) 8) The distance of critical DO deficit from the outfall,
84
Xc = 17.83 Km 85
14
3/18/2023
➢Oxygen deficit or oxygen sag in the stream, at any point of time during the self
purification process is the difference between the saturation DO content and the
actual DO content at that time;
➢ Oxygen deficit, D= Saturation DO - Actual DO
➢The normal saturation DO value for fresh water depends upon the temperature and
total dissolved salts present in it; and its value varies from 14.62 mg/L at 0 oC to
7.63 mg/L at 30oC respectively.
➢The variation of oxygen deficit (D) with the distance along stream or time of flow
from the point of application is depicted by oxygen sag curve.
21 22
24 25
26 27
15
3/18/2023
33
16
3/18/2023
K2=R=Reoxygenation rate
34 35
Q.A city is discharging its sewage into a river. The following data are available.
36
17
3/18/2023
105
➢ Frequently used to analyze the air quality impacts of single,elevated point sources.
1 𝑦 1 𝐻
𝑄
➢ 𝐶𝑥,𝑦,0 = 𝜋𝜎 𝑒 − 2( ൗ𝜎𝑦)^2
.𝑒 −2(ൗ𝜎𝑧 )^2
𝑦 𝜎𝑧 u
where , 𝐶𝑥,𝑦,0 =G.L. concentration of gas,or particulate ˂ 20 μm in size at a distance x m in downwind from
source and distance y in m crosswind (90⁰ from wind direction) from source in 𝜇𝑔/𝑚 3 .
Q=release rate of gas or particulate ˂ 20 𝜇𝑚 in size from elevated point source, 𝜇𝑔/sec.
𝜎𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜎𝑧 =horizontal and vertical dispersion coefficients representing amount of plume spreading in
crosswind and vertical direction resp. at dist. x
downwind from a source and under a given atmospheric stability condition.
u = mean wind speed
H = effective stack height = actual ht.+ plume height
106
18
3/18/2023
Q. A cement factory burns 8 tons of coal/hr and discharges the combustion products through a stack of effective ht. 672×1000
Rate of emission of 𝑆𝑂2 = 60×60
= 186.67 g/sec
of 75 m.The coal has a sulphur content of 4.2% and the wind velocity at top of stack is 6 m/s. The atmospheric
conditions are moderately to slightly unstable. Take 𝜎𝑦 and 𝜎𝑧 as 220 m and 190 m,respectively. Predict the maximum
G.L. concentration of 𝑆𝑂2 at 1500 m downwind and 400 m crosswind direction. Now, maximum G.L. concentration of 𝑆𝑂2 ,
1 𝑦 1 𝐻
𝑄
𝜎𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜎𝑧 =horizontal and vertical dispersion coefficients 𝐶𝑥,𝑦,0,𝐻 = 𝜋𝜎 𝑒 −2 ( ൗ𝜎𝑦)^2
.𝑒 −2( ൗ𝜎𝑧 )^2
representing amount of plume spreading in crosswind and 𝑦𝜎𝑧 u
Solution :- 1 1 75
vertical direction resp. at dist. x 186.67 − (400Τ220)^2 Τ190)^2
Rate of emission of 𝑆𝑂2 ,
= 𝜋×220×190×6 𝑒 2 𝑒 −2(
= 4.2× 10−5 g/𝑚 3
Coal burnt per hr = 8 tons = 8000 kg = 42 𝜇𝑔/𝑚 3.
So, Sulphur produced per hr= 8000 × 4.2%
= 336 kg.
Sulphur combines with oxygen on a one to one basis as the
molecular mass of both S and 𝑂2 is 32 to produce 𝑆𝑂2
110 111
19
3/18/2023
20