0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

LectureGravity

The document discusses the concepts of gravitational force and potential energy, detailing how gravity varies due to Earth's shape, rotation, and internal mass distribution. It introduces the Geoid as the Earth's equipotential surface, which deviates from a spheroid due to these factors, and explains the measurement of gravitational acceleration and anomalies. Additionally, it covers isostasy, compensation models, and the dynamics of the Earth's mantle in relation to geoid anomalies.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

LectureGravity

The document discusses the concepts of gravitational force and potential energy, detailing how gravity varies due to Earth's shape, rotation, and internal mass distribution. It introduces the Geoid as the Earth's equipotential surface, which deviates from a spheroid due to these factors, and explains the measurement of gravitational acceleration and anomalies. Additionally, it covers isostasy, compensation models, and the dynamics of the Earth's mantle in relation to geoid anomalies.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Gravity

force (acceleration) vs potential (energy)

acceleration (g) => GM/r2


Potential => - GM/r

G is Newton’s gravitational constant 6.67x10-11 (S.I. units)


– you should determine what the S.I. units are
g is vector quantity (local vertical component is all that matters)
– most sensitive to nearby mass distribution
Potential is scalar field (actually mathematically easier to deal with)
– more sensitive to distant mass distributions
(because 1/r2 gets smaller with distance faster than 1/r).

Total gravitational field is sum of contributions from all masses.

Surface gravity is associated with


(1) figure of Earth,
(2) rotation of Earth,
(3) internal mass distribution.

(3) is point of interest. Need to understand (1) and (2) in order to determine (3).

(1) Earth’s shape can be approximated by an oblate spheroid characterized by an


ellipticity or polar flattening:
f= (Re-Rp)/Re = 1/298.247 Re= 6378.14 km Rp =6356.75 km
(2) Rotation causes axial centrifugal acceleration that reduces the effective g.

Gravity varies from equator to pole due to


(1) changing distance from center of mass and (40%)
(2) changing distance from rotation axis (60%).

The International Gravity Formula codifies these changes:

g(λ) = ge (1 + α sin2(λ) +β sin4(λ))

ge = 9.7803185 m/s2 (9.832 at poles)


α = 5.278895 x10-3
β = 2.3462 x 10-5
The Geoid

Actual Earth shape deviates from spheroid (by tens of meters) as a result of internal mass
distribution and dynamic processes

Earth’s equipotential surface is the Geoid


– imagine as narrow sea level channel through continents
– Measured as a distance above or below reference spheroid
– Range is +/- tens of meters (+100 m hole near India)
– More sensitive to deeper mass distribution than acceleration

Here is an image of the Geoid determined from SEASAT data (radar altimetry from a
satellite). The color coding shows the large long wave-length variations (e.g. see the
>100 meters “hole” near India and “highs” near Iceland and Borneo). The large areas of
low Geoid relief (not much deviation from the spheroid) are colored green. Short wave
length features are generally due to topographic features on the sea floor (sea mounds
chains and subduction related trenches are most prominent).

Interpretation of measurements of the gravitational acceleration g

Changes in acceleration due to mass distribution are small


– measured in milligal = 10-5 m/s2 or gravity unit (gu) = 10-6 m/s2.
– Field instruments are sensitive to 0.1 gu (part in 108)
– equator to pole variation is 52,000 gu.

Variation of gravity with height in air: 3.1 gu/m (Free air gradient)
Gravity caused by an infinite slab: 2πρGh = 1.1 gu/m for “crustal rock” (Bouguer
correction)

Anomaly  a difference in gravity due to internal mass distributions


Free-air anomaly gFAA = gobs – g(λ) + FAG
Bouguer anomaly gBA = gobs – g(λ) + FAG – BC (+ terrain correction)

Measurement of gravity

“Stable” and “Unstable” gravimeters. Draw diagram to illustrate principle.

We will use a Lacoste and Romberg “unstable” gravimeter. It has a horizontal pendulum
with a test mass pulling down and a “zero-length” spring holding it up. Holding it in
place requires a balance of torques that is achieved with one setting of the spring. One
measures that setting. This is not an “absolute” measurement – it needs to be calibrated
at locations where gravity is known precisely. The instrument is then used to measure
changes in gravity from a “base station” to survey sites. The daily tidal cycle changes
gravity by about 2 g.u over about 6 hours. The instrument may also suffer drift (a time
change of reading associated with a change of the internal spring constant). Thus, one
cycles between survey sites and the base station to determine the drift correction. Since
gravity is sensitive to elevation, one needs to know the elevation of each survey point to
high precision (2 cm to make use of the full precision of the instrument).

Isostasy
All large scale features on Earth are in isostatic equilibrium
- except dynamic topography – discussed below
- Interior is “weak” and flows to achieve equilibrium
- Any column extending into Earth contains the same mass
(if it did not, interior pressure would differ and cause flow)

Compensation depth
– all mass distribution differences are above compensation depth.
– same mass in columns extending to compensation depth

Two models to achieve isostacy:

Airy Compensation - same density of rock but differing thickness.


Iceberg model – mass of above water ice is compensated by
below water ice. Peaks require deeper roots.
Standard idea for continental crust

Pratt Compensation – laterally varying density to a fixed depth. Higher


peaks are underlain by lower density material.
This is the explanation for mid-ocean ridges.
Note:
depth of compensation,
possibility of “elastic” support,
dynamic topography,
mixed compensation in “real” examples

Note behavior of Free-air and Bouguer anomaly over isostatically


compensate features.
gFAA is zero for isostatically compensated structures
gBA is zero for uncompensated structures

Note the size of features going from non-compensated to compensated.

Geoid anomalies are non-zero for compensated structures and differ


depending on compensation mechanism. These details will not be considered
further in this class

Examples of gravity and geoid anomalies

Profiles across structures

Constructed in class

Mantle Dynamics and Geoid anomalies


Static and dynamic contributions
Consider mantle “sinker”
1. contribution from excess mass
2. surface pulled down by flow
3. internal discontinuities deflected
4. core-mantle boundary deflected by flow

You might also like