Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD) vs.

Azure Virtual Machines (VM)

Prepared by Ruben
Date: [Insert Date]
Organization: [Insert Organization Name]
 Agenda
1. Introduction
2. Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD)
3. Virtual Machines (VM)
4. Key Differences
5. Use Cases
6. Conclusion
 Introduction
Virtualization is a foundational concept in cloud computing. It allows multiple operating systems
to run on a single physical machine, optimizing resource use and enhancing flexibility.
This report compares two prominent virtualization services offered by Microsoft Azure: Azure
Virtual Desktop (AVD) and Azure Virtual Machines (VMs).
 Understanding Virtualization
Definition: Virtualization allows for multiple virtual environments to exist on a single physical
server.
Importance: It supports cloud scalability, reduces physical hardware costs, and improves
resource utilization.
 Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD) – Overview
AVD is a desktop and app virtualization service hosted on Azure, designed to offer flexible,
scalable, and secure remote desktop experiences.
 AVD – Key Features
- Multi-session capability: Enables multiple users on a single virtual machine.
- Built-in security: Offers multi-factor authentication (MFA) and conditional access.
- Simplified management: Integrated with the Azure portal for centralized control.
 AVD – Benefits
- Ideal for remote work setups
- Centralized IT management
- Secure access from any location and device
 Virtual Machines (VM) – Overview
A VM is a software-based emulation of a physical computer. Azure VMs provide computing
environments with customizable configurations and operating systems.
 VM – Key Features
- Customization: Supports multiple operating systems and VM sizes
- Isolation: Dedicated environments for applications
- Flexibility: Suitable for diverse workloads
 VM – Benefits
- Useful for application hosting
- Supports software development environments
- Ideal for isolated workload deployment
 AVD vs. VM – Architecture
- AVD: Multi-session Windows 10/11, shared VM instances
- VM: Typically single-session; runs any supported OS independently
 AVD vs. VM – Cost & Scalability
- AVD: Cost-effective for large user groups due to session sharing
- VM: More granular control but higher cost for many users
 AVD vs. VM – Security & Compliance
- AVD: Built-in MFA and conditional access
- VM: Security must be configured and managed separately
 AVD vs. VM – User Experience
- AVD: Seamless experience across devices with centralized control
- VM: More flexibility, but requires manual setup and monitoring
 Use Case – AVD
- Organizations needing remote workforce solutions
- Centralized management for global teams
- BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) environments
 Use Case – VM
- Hosting legacy applications
- Development and test environments
- Isolated workloads with high customization needs
 Choosing Between AVD & VM
- AVD is ideal for scalability, central management, and user density
- VM is better suited for specific, customizable use cases
 Conclusion
Both AVD and VM provide valuable virtualization solutions. The choice depends on the
organization’s size, security requirements, workload types, and budget.
 References
- Microsoft Azure Documentation
- Industry Whitepapers on Virtualization
- Internal Technical Analysis
 Thank You
Thank you for reviewing this report. For further questions or discussions, please feel free to
reach out.
Prepared by: Ruben
Contact Info: [Insert Email/Phone]