Comparative Evaluation of Genotyping and Culture-Based Techniques For Fungal Keratitis Detection
Comparative Evaluation of Genotyping and Culture-Based Techniques For Fungal Keratitis Detection
1, JUNE 2023
Oladejo M. Janet1 , Oladejo O. J2, Odetoyin B.3 , Akinduti P. A.4 Oluwaloniola V. M.1 Tangkat T1, Deji-Agboola
A. M.4
Abstract:
The study aims to compare the direct polymerase chain reaction with microbial culture for the detection and fungal pathogens in
infectious keratitis. A total of 81 corneal ulcers were culture and analyzed prospectively. PCR was performed with all corneal
scrapping with fungal and bacteria specific primers. PCR products were analysed and compared with the culture results using
standard methods. Of the 81 samples, 80 were positive by PCR, 51 for fungi and 29 for bacteria. Out of 51 PCR positive samples,
22 samples were culture positive and 29 were culture negative. The majority of PCR genotyped samples matched the positive
culture results. The positive detection rate of 80/81 (98.8%) with high suspicion of fungal keratitis and positive detection rate of
direct PCR 50/51(98.0%) were observed. The sensitivities for the diagnosis of fungal keratitis with direct PCR and culture were
98.0% (50/51) and 43.1% (22/51) (p< 0.001) whereas the specificities were 100.0% (2/2) and 100.0% (1/1) respectively. The time
required to complete the direct PCR was only 3 hours. The direct PCR assay is a rapid diagnostic technique with high sensitivity
and specificity for infectious keratitis and it is expected to have impact on the diagnosis and treatment of infectious keratitis.
Department of the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital cornea using 23G sterile needle under Slit Lamp
(UITH), Sobi Specialist Hospital and Civil Service Clinic Biomicroscope after instillation of non-preservative topical
which serve as referral hospitals in Kwara State, North Central, anaesthesia into the infected eye. Immediately after collection,
Nigeria. Ethical permission for the study was obtained. the samples were introduced into brain heart infusion broth
(BHB), yeast extract broth (YEB), and Tris EDTA buffer which
Eyes with clinically suspected viral and parasitic corneal ulcers was stored at temperature of -800C. Also smears of the samples
were excluded. History of pain, photophobia, watering, and were made on the slide for Gram staining and the remaining
redness were taken as inclusion criteria. Duration of symptoms sample was streaked directly on Blood agar, Chocolate and
and history of predisposing factors like trauma, contact lens MacConkey agar.
wear, dry eye, surgery, etc. were noted. Ocular examination
included visual acuity (VA) of both eyes, and slit lamp
examination of the cornea for size, site, and depth of the ulcer,
presence or absence of perforation. Fluorescein staining of the
corneal ulcer for epithelial defect and the presence or absence
of hypopyon were determined. After taking informed consent
and explaining the procedure to the patient, the corneal
scrapings were collected by the Ophthalmologist from infected
81 total samples
Fig. 1. PCR and Culture results of samples collected from infectious keratitis patients
Gram stained for cellular morphology, biochemical test carried positive to phenotypic confirmatory test were grown on
out according to Sagar Aryal [20]. nutrient agar for 24 hours.
The yeast extract broths (YEB) were subcultured onto A single colony growth was picked, transferred to 0.1 mls of
Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) and were incubated at 28 sterile water, boiled for 10 minutes to lyse the cells. The lysate
degree Celsius for five days. Lactophenol cotton blue wet was centrifuge and 3 ml of the supernatant was used as the
mount preparation was carried out on the growth from DNA sample for the PCR. All primers were prepared by Iqaba
Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) plates while Mycology Atlas Biotechnology, West African Limited. They were used in 4 sets
and biochemical tests were used for the identification of the of PCR as follows:
fungi. Suspected yeast isolates from Sabouraud dextrose agar Extracted DNA was genotyped for bacterial and fungal isolates
(oxoid, UK) were Gram’s stained and confirmed yeast isolates using the universal bacterial primer (27f, 1525r)
were further characterized as reported by Matare [21]. (5’-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3,
5’-AAGGAGGTGATCCARCC-3); Universal fungi (F, R)
Phenotypical bacteria and fungi isolates (GTG AAA TTG TTG AAA GGGAA, GAC TCC TTG GTC
Bacterial DNA was isolated by boiling method according to the CGT GTT); Species Specific primer (Pseudomonas aeruginosa
steps previously described by Grupta [18]. Isolates that were ( PA-SS-F, PA-SS-R), Staphylococcus aureus (S4F, S4R) and
Staphylococcus epidermidis (91E-F, 3B-R); Primers specific
for Candida albicans (CABF59F, CADBR125R) to identify 25 cycles (GeneAmp PCR System 9700; Applied Biosystems,
samples that gave positive results in the second set of PCR. For Foster City, CA, USA). After an initial denaturation at 95
all PCR protocols, a reaction mixture without sample DNA was degree Celsius for 5 minutes, each cycle consisted of
used as a negative control, in addition to using DNA from the denaturation at 94 degree Celsius for 1 minute, annealing at 50
most common cause of microbial keratitis as a positive control. degree. Amplification was performed in a thermal cycler for a
Amplification was performed in a thermal cycler for a total of total of 25 cycles (GeneAmp PCR System 9700; Applied
2
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF GENOTYPING AND CULTURE-BASED TECHNIQUES FOR FUNGAL KERATITIS DETECTION
Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). After an initial then electrophorised in 1% of agarose gel then stained with
denaturation at 95 degree Celsius for 1 minute, and extension at E2-vision blue light DNA dye and visualized in an ultraviolet
72 degree Celsius for 5 minutes. The amplified product was transilluminator [15].
3. RESULTS
The age group ranged from 10-65 years with a male to female ratio 3:1 as shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Age distribution for Infectious Cornea Keratitis among the patients
The majority of patients were outdoor workers more importantly the artisans, farmers and traders which accounted for 79.1%
(Table 2). The single largest category among outdoor workers was farmers, constituting 38.3% of total patients.
Table 2: Occupation as risk factor for Infectious Cornea Keratitis among the patients
P <0.001 is significant
The mean duration of patients presenting to hospital was 7 days. Most patients had symptoms for at least 7-10 days. Centrally
located corneal ulcers were evident in many patients (75.0%). Majority of the ulcers (87.3%) measured 1-3mm in size while 12.7%
of patients had ulcer size > 4mm.
Table 3: PCR detection results for suspected infectious keratitis in the clinic
3
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF GENOTYPING AND CULTURE-BASED TECHNIQUES FOR FUNGAL KERATITIS DETECTION
Bacterial 29 29 0 35.8%
keratitis
Out of 52 samples that were fungal suspected infectious keratitis one was PCR negative which means cornea was co-infected with
other microbe aside from bacteria. The total positive detection rate was 98.8% as shown in table 3 above.
Table 4: Performance of Direct PCR and Culture for diagnosis of Fungal keratitis
Negative 1 1 1 1
P<0.001
The performance of culture and direct PCR with corneal scrapings from all patients were analysed. The sensitivity and specificity
of direct PCR were 95.6% (22/23) and 96.6% (29/30) respectively (Table 4). After discrepant analysis, a total of 50 true positives
were obtained. The sensitivity and specificity of direct PCR was 98.0% and 100% respectively. However, of the 50 true positives,
only 22 showed positive results by culture. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of culture was 43.3% and 100% respectively.
Figure1. DNA amplicons of Fungal Isolates expressed on agarose gel showed presence
of band in lane 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and lane 1 is the marker while no band was found in
lane 2.
4. DISCUSSION to 49 years and it indicates an active working year for most men
who strive to have sustainable socioeconomic status and also
In this study, bacterial and fungal strains associated with provide for the family. Many people were involved in active
infectious keratitis were studied among patients of various service such as farming, trading in local materials, retail and
demographic characteristics. The demographic studies showed petty business that could predisposed them to infectious
high prevalence (59.3%) of infectious keratitis among ages 21 keratitis from soil or other contaminated materials while trying
4
COVENANT JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND LIFE SCIENCES, VOL. 01, NO. 1, JUNE 2023
5
COVENANT JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND LIFE SCIENCES, VOL. 01, NO. 1, JUNE 2023
factors, and clinical outcomes in severe microbial keratitis in [23] Ibanga S. S, Etim B. A, Nkanga D. G, Asana U E, Duke R
South India. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2018; 25: 297-305. E. Corneal ulcers at the University of Calabar Teaching
Hospital in Nigeria. A Ten year Review. Bri Micro Res J. 2016;
[11] Ong H S, Fung S. S, Macleod D, Dart J K, Tuft S. J, Burton 14:1-10.
M. J. Altered patterns of fungal keratitis at a London
ophthalmic referral hospital: an eight-year retrospective [24] Joshi R K, Goyal R. K, Kochar A. A prospective study of
observational study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 168: 227-236. clinical profile, epidemiology and etiological diagnosis of
corneal ulcer in North-West Rajasthan. Int Community Med
[12] Sagar Aryal. API (Analytical Profile Index) 20E Public Health. 2017; 4:4544-7.
Test-Procedure, Uses and Interpretation. April, 2019. Apiweb
(http//apiweb.biomerieux.com). [25] Seal S, Bhowmik P, Epidemiological and Microbiological
Profile of Infective Keratitis in a Referral Centre,
[13] Somerville T F, Corless C E, Sueke H, Neal T, Kaye S B. Bhubaneshwar, Odisha. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical
16S Ribosomal RNA PCR versus conventional diagnostic Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) 2014; Issue 6 Ver. II: PP 70-76.
culture in the investigation of suspected bacterial keratitis.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020; 9: 2. [26] Lap-KI Ng A, Kai-Wang To K, Choi C C, Yuen C C, Yim
S M, Chan K S ET AL. Predisposing factors, microbial
[14] Behera H S, Srigyan D, Evaluation of polymerase chain characteristics and clinical outcome of microbial keratitis in a
reaction over routine microbial diagnosis for the diagnosis of tertiary centre in Hong Kong: A 10-year Expreience. J
fungal keratitis. Optom Vis Sci. 2021; 98: 280-4. Ophthalmol. 2015; 9: 44-56.
[15] Shimizu D, Miyazaki D, Ehara F, Shimizu Y, Uotani R, [27] Ting D S J, Settle C, Morgan S J, Baylis O, Ghosh S. A 10-
Inata K, et al. Effectiveness of 16S ribosomal DNA reat-time year analysis of microbiological profiles of microbial keratitis:
PCR and sequencing for diagnosing bacterial keratitis. Graefes The North East England study. Eye. 2018; 8: 1416-1417.
Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020; 258: 157-66.
[28] Khoo P, Cabrera-Aguas M P, Nguyen V, Lahra M U,
[16] Panda A, Pal Singh T, Satpathy G, Wadhwani M, Matwani Warson S L. Microbial keratitis in Sydney. Australia: risk
M. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and standard factors, patient outcomes, and seasonal variation. Graefes Arch
microbiological techniques in presumed corneal ulcers. Int Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020; 8:1745-1755.
Ophthalmol. 2021; 35: 159-6514.
[29] Ferrer C, Alio J L. Evaluation of molecular diagnosis in
[17] Zhao G, Zhai H, Yuan Q, Sun S, Liu T, Xiel L. Rapid and fungal keratitis. Ten years of experience. J Ophthalmic
sensitive diagnosis of fungal keratitis with direct PCR without Inflamm Infect. 2011; 1: 15-22.
template DNA extraction. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014; 20:
0776-0782. [30] Kim E, Chidambaram J D, Srinivasan M et al. Prospective
comparison of microbial culture and polymerase chain reaction
[18] Gupta N, DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction. J in the diagnosis of corneal ulcer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 146:
Cytol. 2019; 36: 116-117. 714-723.
[19] Shimizu D, Miyazaki D, Ehara F, Shimizu Y, Uotani R, [31] Kuo M. T., Chang H. C, Cheng C. K, Chien C. C, Fang P.
Inata K, Sasaki S I, Inoue Y. Effectiveness of 16S ribosomal C, Chang T C. A highly sensitive method for molecular
DNA real-time PCR and sequencing for diagnosing bacterial diagnosis of fungal keratitis: a dot hybridization assay.
keratitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020; 258: Ophthalmology. 2012; 119: 2434-2442.
157-166.