main COMPANY LAW -NOTES
main COMPANY LAW -NOTES
Formation of a Company
This follows 4 stages namely:
a. Memorandum of Association
b. Articles of Association
3. List of directors
4. Written concent of the directors
5. Statutory declaration
Effects of Incorporation
(ii) The terms of the Memorandum and Articles are within the law.
(iii) All requirements of the Act in respect of registration have been complied with.
(iv) A private company can start its business after getting the certificate of incorporation.
(v) With the issue of certificate, the company takes birth with a separate legal entity.
A private company or a public company not having share capital can commence business
immediately on its incorporation. As such ‘capital subscription stage’ and ‘commencement of
business stage’ are relevant only in the case of a public company having a share capital. Such
a company has to pass through these additional two stages before it can commence business.
Under the capital subscription stage comes the task of obtaining the necessary capital for the
company.
For this purpose, soon after the incorporation, a meeting of the Board of Directors is
convened to deal with the following business:
1. Appointment of the Secretary. In most cases the appointment of pre-term secretary (who is
appointed at the promotion stage) is confirmed.
The company will now proceed to obtain the permission of the Controller of Capital Issue, ,
under the Capital Issue Control Act.
After getting the certificate of incorporation, a private company can start its business. A
public company can start its business only after getting a’ certificate of commencement of
business.
After getting the certificate of incorporation
(i) A public company issues a prospectus of inviting the public to subscribe to its share
capital.
(iii) The company is required to sell a minimum number of shares mentioned in the
prospectus.
After making the sale of the required number of shares a certificate is sent to the Registrar
stating this fact, along-with a letter from the banks, that it has received application money for
such shares. The Registrar scrutinizes the documents. If he is satisfied, then issues a
certificate known as Certificate of Commencement of Business. This is the conclusive
evidence of the commencement of the business.
TYPES OF COMPANY
Joint stock companies under the English law are broadly classified into the following two
major categories;
Incorporated companies
Unincorporated associations
Incorporated companies
These companies are classified into the following three categories on the basis of formation
a) Chartered companies
b) Statutory companies
c) Registered companies
Chartered companies
These companies are formed by the crown in exercise of the royal prerogative power by grant
of a charter to persons who intends to form a business. The powers, scope of operations and
nature of the business of the company are defined under the act. Examples of this company
can be the bank of England (1694). No such companies are currently formed in Kenya and
section 12 of the universities Act which empowers the head of state to grant charter to any
private university if in his opinion the grant will facilitate the advancement of higher
education in Kenya should not be confused with these companies.
Statutory companies
These are companies which are formed through the act of parliament or the companies Act.
They are mostly formed to carry out specific business activities which are commonly public
undertakings e.g. railway, waterworks etc. They do not have shareholders and hence their
initial capital normally comes from the consolidated fund through the act forming it. Their
powers, scope of operations and nature of activities are found within the Act forming it.
The provisions of the companies Act regarding operations and management applies to the
company just like the other companies i.e. registered companies.
Registered companies
It is the type of company defined under section 2 of the Act as company formed and
registered under the companies Act.
The companies come into existence immediately upon registration and the issue of certificate
of incorporation. These companies are further classified on the basis of ownership into either
private or public company under section 4(1).
1. Private company
These are companies according to section 4(1) as formed by two or more persons but not
exceeding fifty. Section 30 states that this company must have an article prepared showing
the following provisions;
i. Restrict the right of transfer of shares, if any;
ii. Prohibit the invitation of the public to subscribe for any of its shares or debentures,
iii. Limit the number of members to fifty, not including the present or past employee
shareholders.
2. Public company
This is a company which according to section 4(1) is formed by any seven or more person. It
is a company with a share capital which has a memorandum stating that it is a public
company and which has been registered or re-registered as such. It is a company which is not
a private company and has the following features;
i. Does not have any restrictions on transfer of its shares
ii. Does not limit the maximum number of members
iii. Can invite the public for the subscription of its shares or debentures.
Unlimited companies.
This companies are similar to partnerships and the liability of the members in this type of
company is unlimited and therefore extents to the personal property of the members.
The liability of the member in this case can only be exercised by the company when it goes
into liquidation, and in case of a past member within one year after a person has ceased from
being a member of the company and also on condition that the present members (then called
contributories) are unable to contribute towards the company’s debts.
Government Company
The company Act is silent about this company but under the English law, this is a company
where not less than fifty one per cent (51%) of the paid up capital is held by the central
government, by any state government, partly by the central government and partly by one or
more state governments or is a subsidiary of the an existing government company.
Shares held by the municipal and local authorities are not to be included in the determination
Such contracts may relate to property which the promoters wish to purchase for the company
or they may be made with persons whose know-how is vital to the success of the company.
The promoters may perhaps have arranged for the company to take over an existing business,
and therefore need to make a contract with the vendor for its sale or purchase. Before its
incorporation, a company has no capacity to contract.
A contract entered into by promoters on behalf of a proposed company is void in so far as the
company is concerned. The promoters cannot be agents for a principal which has not yet
come into existence. In such cases the company cannot sue or be sued on it.
Legal effect of a pre-incorporation contract on the company being incorporated
Several judicial presence have been set in respect of pre-incorporations contract and this
provides the basis of the pre incorporation contracts rules as they relate to companies. This
includes;
(i) That the company when registered cannot ratify the agreement since a ratified
contract has retrospective effect.
The company was not a principal with contractual capacity at the time when the contract was
made. A contract can be ratified only when it is made by an agent for a principal who is in
existence and who is competent to contract at the time when the contract is made. In Natal
Land Colonisation company. Ltd vs. Pauline Colliery Syndicate Ltd (1904), N company
agreed with Mrs Carrey an agent of a syndicate before its incorporation that N company
would grant a mining lease to the syndicate. The syndicate was incorporated as Pauline
Colliery. Pauline Company discovered coal whereupon Natal Land Co. Ltd refused to grant
the lease.
It was held that there was no binding contract between Natal Land Co. Ltd and Pauline
Company as the latter was not in existence when the contract was signed.
If the company were allowed to ratify the contract it would mean that it contracted on the
date the contract was formed. This in effect would mean that the company contracted before
it was formed.
(ii) If the contract is in writing and it appears the company proposed was contracting as
a party, the promoters will not be allowed to enforce it in case of breach.
(iii). If the contract was written and it appears that the promoters were acting as in their
personal capacity, the company will not be liable nor will it be able to sue to enforce any
rights associated with it in Case Law: Kelner vs. Baxter (1866). It was held that B was
personally liable and no ratification could release him from his liability.
An agreement was made between K& B. B was acting on behalf of the proposed hotel
company. Wine supplied under the contract was used by the company which had “ratified”
the agreement after incorporation. The company went into liquidation before paying the
debt.
MANAGEMENT OF A COMPANY
A company in the eyes of the law is an artificial person and cannot act in its existence and
can only act through human agency i.e. directors, who are delegated the duty of managing the
general affairs of the company. They are collectively known as the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors are given the powers to manage the company and has powers to bring
an action against the members to restrain them. They have great powers and the court
generally refuses to interfere with their management of company affairs if they keep within
those powers.
Circumstances when members have a right to intervene and take away management
from Board of Directors.
1. Where the directors are improperly using the name of the company in litigation.
In Danish Mercantile Co Vs Beamont (1951), the company in question appointed X and Y to
be its directors. X and Y were also members of the company. Their appointment as Directors
was contained in a separate agreement with them which conferred upon them powers to
manage the conduct of the affairs of the company as they thought fit. After a year, a dispute
arose between this company and another one. Y in particular, using the name of their
company, brought an action against the other company. In bringing this action, he never
informed colleagues nor the company in a general meeting, before the action actually
commenced. The company went into liquidation and the liquidator brought an action to strike
out the name of this company as a plaintiff in this action. It was held by the court of appeal
that the action by Y had been improperly instituted and in an event like that the members or
their representatives i.e. the liquidator could rightly bring an action to terminate that action
because by secretly instituting the proceedings, the directors were abusing the name of the
company.
(2). If the board of Directors itself cannot function due to one reason or another the members
can intervene.
(3). Where the Directors have acted ultra vires, the powers granted to them or the company
itself.
PROSPECTUS
Refers to circular, notice, advertisement, or other invitation, offering to the public for
subscription or purchase any shares or debentures of a company. In simple words it refers to
any document inviting offers from the public for subscription of shares or debentures of a
company. A prospectus must be in writing. An oral invitation to subscribe shares in, or
debentures of a company or deposit is not a prospectus.
Subscription
It means taking or agreeing to take’ shares for cash. It means that the person agreeing to take
shares puts himself under a liability to pay the nominal amount thereof in cash.
Invitation to public
Public includes any section of the public, whether selected as members or debenture holders
of the company concerned or as clients of the person issuing the prospectus or in any other
manner.
Meaning of the word issued
It means issued to the public, this may be done by agent of the company and not necessarily
the company itself.
FORM AND CONTENTS OF A PROSPECTUS
A prospectus is the window through which an investor can look into the soundness of a
company’s venture.
The contents and preparations of all prospectus must be in accordance with the provision of
the Act and the following rules must be observed in all cases.
a. Section 43 provides that a copy of the prospectus must be delivered to the registrar of
companies and must be signed by every person who is named therein as Director or
proposed director.
b. Section 39 provides that every prospectus issued by or on behalf of a company must be
dated and the date unless the contrary is approved.
Characteristics of Prospectuses
The essential characteristics and the features of the prospectus are the following:
i. It is a document described or issued as a prospectus.
ii. It includes any notice, circular, advertisement, inviting deposits from the public or other
document.
iii. It is an invitation to the members of the public.
iv. The public is invited to subscribe the shares or debenture of the company
N/B
The term public does not mean an invitation of very large number of people. It is enough if
the invitation is to a section of the public. In South of England Natural Gas Co Ltd case, P
“strictly private circulation” = stated to have been distributed by the promoters only to the
shareholders in certain gas companies in which they were interested. 3,000 copies were sent
out. The court held that the prospectus was an offer of shares to the public. It is a domestic
concern of the persons making and receiving the offer or invitation. Thus an offer to one’s
kith and kin cannot be considered to be an invitation to public. But an invitation to a few
friends and relatives or to the customers of the promoter does not institute a prospectus. In
Sherwell vs. Combined Incandescent Mantles -“strictly private and confidential, not for
publication.” The directors distributed, without the authority and company, 200 of them
amongst their and promoters’ friends and relatives. The court held that it was not an
invitation to the public.
From these cases it follows that there must be some degree of publicity, even though it is on a
low key.
v. Prospectus is the document through which the Company secures the capital needed for
Carrying on its business. Any document having this object, comes within the definition of
prospectus.
Corporate shares
These are shares created by a company for issue to its employees. They are shares that serve
special purpose, i.e. given to employees as a means to win their co-operation with the
company’s management and owners. They are issued without voting rights but have the right
to earn dividend.
Deferred or founders’ shares
These are shares issued to the founders of the company. They are also given right to
apportion of the profits if the dividend on ordinary shares exceed a certain fixed amount.
WINDING UP OR LIQUIDATION
According to Professor Gower, he defined it as a process whereby a company’s life is ended
and its property administered for the benefit of its creditors and members.
During this process management of a company’s affairs is taken out of the director’s hand, its
assets are realised by a liquidator and its debts are paid out of the proceeds of realization.
Winding up and dissolution
Winding and dissolution of a company are not one and the same thing. Winding up precedes
dissolution i.e. it is the process by which the dissolution of a company is brought a bout. At
the end of winding up, the company will not have assets or liabilities and it will therefore be
simply be a formal step for it to be dissolved that is for legal personality as a corporation to
be destroyed. In between winding up and dissolution the legal entity of the company remains
and it can be sued in a court of law.
Winding up and insolvency
The above two are not one and the same thing.
1. Winding up in order can be made, even when the company is insolvent. In other words,
winding up is not confined to cases where a company insolvent, but it may be adopted as
a means of enabling the company or members to reincorporate with more extended
objects or further powers or more efficient means of management.
2. On winding up, the company as such does not cease to exist, only its administration is
carried through the medium of a liquidator. The property of the still belong to the
company which can carry on business and file suits in its own name. It is otherwise in the
case of insolvency.
3. Even where a company is wound up because it is insolvent circumstances, all the
provisions of the insolvency law do not apply to it.
Modes of winding up
There are three modes of winding up.
a. Winding up by court
b. Voluntary winding up. This may be
i. Members’ voluntary winding up
ii. Creditor’s voluntary winding up
Winding up subject to the supervision of the court.
Winding up by court
This occur under court order and it is called compulsory winding. This occur under the
following circumstances
i. If the company has, by special resolution, resolved that it be wound up by the court.
ii. Default is made in delivering the statutory report to the registrar or in holding the
statutory meeting.
iii. Where there is a failure to commence business within a year or where the business is
suspended for a whole year by the whole year by a company.
The court cannot only wind it up if
a. There is a reasonable prospect of the company starting business within a reasonable time.
b. There are good reasons for delay i.e. the suspension of the business is satisfactorily
accounted for and appears to be due to temporary causes.
iv. The number of the members reduced in the case of private company below two or in
the case of any other company below seven.
v. Where the company is unable to pay its debts i.e.
a. A creditor to whom the company owes more than one thousand shillings has left at the
company’s registered office demands to be paid of the sum due and the company has for
three weeks thereafter neglected to pay the sum or to secure or compound for it to the
reasonable satisfaction of the creditor.
b. Execution or other processes in favour of creditors of the company is returned unsatisfied
in whole or part.
c. It is proved to the satisfaction of the court that the company is unable to pay its debts,
taking into account the contingent and prospective liabilities of the company.
vi. Just and equitable
It means that the jurisdiction of the court is not limited to any particular case. The principle
of just and equitable clause baffles a precise definition i.e. it must rest upon the judicial
discretion of the court depending upon the facts and circumstances of each case.
What is ‘just and equitable’ clause.
The court may order winding up under the just and equitable clause in the following cases.
1. When management is carried out in such a way that the minority shareholders is
disregarded or oppressed, this must be proved. This can be proved if abuse of majority
voting power is realized.
2. Where there is a deadlock in the management of the company. Where shareholding is
more or less equal and there is a case of complete deadlock in the company.
3. When the company was formed to carry out fraudulent or illegal business or when the
business of the company becomes illegal.
4. In the case of a company incorporated outside Kenya and carrying on business in Kenya.
Winding up proceedings have been commenced in respect of it either:
i. In the country of its incorporation or
ii. In any country in which it has been established a place of business, Section 219.
5. When substratum of the company is gone. The substratum of the company can be said to
have disappeared only when the object for impossible to carry on the business except at
loss, or existing liabilities. The stratum of a company disappears
i. When the subject matter of the company is gone.
ii. When the main object of the company has substantially failed or become
impractible. Its substratum is gone and it might be wound up even though it is
carrying on its business in pursuit of a subsidiary object.
iii. When the company is carrying on its business at loss and there is no reasonable hope
that the object of trading can be attained.
iv. Where the existing and probable assets of the company are insufficient to meet its
existing liabilities. Where a company is totally unable to pay off creditors and there
is ever increasing burden of interest and deteriorating state of management and
control of business owing to sharp differences between shareholders, the court will
order winding up.
Who may petition for company winding up?
According to section 221, an application to the courts for winding up is by petition which
may be presented:
a. By the company itself to the court for winding up after it has passed a special
resolution. This should be supported by resolution in a general meeting.
b. By any creditor or creditors (Including any contingent or prospective creditor or
creditors). Creditor here implies every person having a pecuniary claim against the
company whether actual or contingent, such a person is competent to file a petition
for the winding up of the company.
Persons included in the category of a creditor are:
A contingent or prospective creditor – Holder of bills of exchange not yet due or
holders of debentures not yet payable
A debenture holder
A legal representative of deceased creditor
The government or a local authority to whom any tax or other public charge is due.
Any person who has pecuniary claim against the company whether actual or
contingent.
Commencement of winding up
Where, before the presentation of a petition for winding up of a company by the court, a
resolution has been passed by the company for voluntary winding up, the winding up shall be
deemed to have commenced from the date of the resolution for voluntary winding up. The
winding up of the company by the court shall be deemed to commence at the time of
presentation of the petition for the winding up.
When an order is made for winding up, it relates back to the date of the presentation of the
petition.
Procedure of winding up by the court
In section 218, a petition for winding up order against a company may be presented to the
High court of Kenya, such a petition must be supported by an affidavit of the petitioner.
When determining the petition under section 222, the court may either,
a. Dismiss it with or without costs
b. Adjourn the hearing, conditionally or unconditionally or
c. Make an interim order or
d. Make any other order (for compulsory winding up or winding up under the supervision of
the courts) that thinks necessary.
However, the courts must not refuse to grant a winding up order on the ground only that the
company’s assets have been mortgaged to an amount equal to or in excess of their value or
that the company has no assets.
As per section 222 (3), where a petition is presented on the ground that the statutory meeting
has not been held or the statutory report has not been delivered, the court may:
i. Require the meeting to be held or the report to be filed instead of making a winding
up order
ii. Order the costs to be paid by any persons responsible for the default.
Are venues where savings and investments are channelled between the suppliers who have
capital and those who are in need of capital. The entities that have capital include retail
and institutional investors while those who seek capital are businesses, governments, and
people. Capital markets are composed of primary and secondary markets. The most common
capital markets are the stock market and the bond market.
Capital markets seek to improve transactional efficiencies. These markets bring those who
hold capital and those seeking capital together and provide a place where entities can
exchange securities. Capital markets are used to sell financial products such as equities and
debt securities. Equities are stocks, which are ownership shares in a company. Debt
securities, such as bonds, are interest-bearing IOUs.
The secondary market, on the other hand, includes venues overseen by a regulatory body like
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) where existing or already-issued securities
are traded between investors. Issuing companies do not have a part in the secondary market.
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and Nasdaq are examples of the secondary market.
Balance of power in the company raises the question of the relationship between the company
in general meeting and the Board of Directors. All these bodies have distinct powers and
controls of the company provided for in the Companies Act, and or the memorandum and
articles of Association of the Company. The general meeting is principally responsible for
election of the directors while directors are principally concerned with the management of the
company. The question is which of the two bodies;
Board and shareholders in general meeting have more powers in the control of the company
and what should happen if one body misuses its powers to the detriment of the other. In this
paper, I examine the arguments that have been raised by other authors in favour of
shareholders in general meeting as having the control over the company on the one hand and
the Board of directors on the other hand. I argue that the powers of the shareholders is
restricted and only exercised as permitted by the Articles and Memorandum of Association.
The Board is vested with a lot of powers in the management of the company and that its
improper exercise leaves the shareholders in most jurisdictions at the mercy of the Board. I
further lend an argument that corporate governance has developed principles which are
intended to tame the powers of the Board of directors outside the law. I analyse how the
principles of good corporate governance once implemented can ensure that the Board acts
within acceptable means, and I end by recommending that principles of good corporate
governance be made into law by States that have not done so as the same will ensure
compliance by the Board.