How Has Urban-Rural Disparity Shaped Regional Educational

Gap in 2000s’ China?

Educational inequality between urban and rural areas in China has
been a persistent issue since the country entered the 2000s. This
disparity is deeply rooted in systemic factors such as structural
inequality, resource disparities, and socio-cultural reproduction,
which collectively hinder rural students' access to quality education
and upward mobility. For example, in 2010, Beijing spent 20,023
yuan per secondary school student, while Guizhou spent only 3,204
yuan (Lavely et al., 1990). Additionally, the hukou (household
registration) system restricts rural students' access to urban schools
and elite universities, while rural schools suffer from inadequate
funding, outdated infrastructure, and a shortage of qualified
teachers (Zhan, 2011, p.243–285; Zhang & Zhao, 2006, p.261–286).
These systemic barriers are further reinforced by cultural
stereotypes and vocational education biases, perpetuating cycles of
disadvantage (Kipnis, 2001, p.1–24; Ling, 2015, p.108–131).This
review focuses on understanding the multifaceted nature of
educational disparities in China, particularly how structural,
resource-based, and socio-cultural factors contribute to the
persistent divide between urban and rural education systems. It also
explores potential solutions, such as policy reforms and
technological interventions, to address these challenges. By
synthesizing these themes, this paper argues that achieving
educational equity in China requires a combination of systemic
reforms, targeted investments, and innovative solutions to bridge
the urban-rural divide.

Social Structural Inequality

The divide in education between urban and rural China is deeply
embedded in systemic inequities, including unequal resource
allocation, flawed policy frameworks, and cultural prejudices. For
instance, Zhang and Zhao (2006, p.261–286) observe that rural
education suffers from a lack of certified teachers and diverse
academic programs. Moreover, institutional barriers like the hukou
system further limit rural students' access to urban schools and
prestigious universities (Zhan, 2011, p.243–285). As a result,
resources such as government funding and advanced facilities are
disproportionately concentrated in urban areas, leaving rural
schools under-resourced (Lavely et al., 1990, p.61–93). Furthermore,
policy structures exacerbate these disparities.
Additionally, Kipnis (2001, p.1–24) highlights how cultural
stereotypes portray rural students as less competent, perpetuating
cycles of diminished self-confidence and restricted upward mobility.
Similarly, Liu (2013, p.868–887) notes that elite universities favor
urban candidates, with only 17% of Tsinghua University students
coming from rural areas in 2010, despite rural students comprising
over 60% of gaokao participants. Although the nine-year compulsory
education policy has increased rural enrollment, its uneven
implementation and lack of financial support undermine its
effectiveness.
While technological advancements, such as online education, offer
alternative pathways to traditional systems, they cannot fully
address the root causes of inequality. For example, Zhiting,
Xiaoqing, and Qiyun (2003, p.23–27) report that approximately 200
virtual schools in China serve over 600,000 students, providing
online lessons and personalized tutoring. However, without reforms
addressing inequitable funding distribution and discriminatory
admissions policies, technological advancements alone cannot close
the gap. Therefore, policy interventions, such as equitable resource
allocation and targeted higher education reforms, remain crucial
(Guo & Chen, 2023, p.638–663).

Educational Resource Disparities

Regional differences in educational development are closely tied to
resource distribution, which severely restricts rural education. This
inequality is evident in the unbalanced distribution of capital,
teachers, and technical resources. For example, in 2010, Beijing
spent 20,023 yuan per secondary school student, while Guizhou
spent only 3,204 yuan (Lavely et al., 1990). Consequently, regions
with better economic conditions invest more in educational
resources, while poorer areas struggle (Yuan et al., 2023), affecting
teacher training and adaptation to technological advancements.
Furthermore, Hannum, An, and Cherng (2011, p.267–305) point out
that insufficient funding for digital education resources exacerbates
technological imbalances. Although there have been improvements
in rural population quality and economic growth, regional economic
disparities continue to impact educational investment and quality
(Tsang, 2000). Online education and distance learning are
considered potential tools to narrow this gap; however, insufficient
rural network infrastructure limits their effectiveness (Gåsemyr,
2020). Local governments play a crucial role in resource allocation,
but their ability to allocate resources depends on the level of
regional economic development (Li, 2017). This gap between policy
design and implementation highlights the need for better
coordination between central and local governments to ensure
effective resource allocation in rural areas (Hannum et al., 2011;
Zhang, 2024).Targeted investments in rural Internet infrastructure
and digital literacy teacher training are necessary (Ling, 2015). For
instance, pilot projects in less developed regions could integrate
online education with traditional instruction, ensuring rural students
benefit from technological advances (Hao et al., 2014). Ultimately,
technology must be combined with policy support and resource
investment to truly achieve educational equity (Hannum et al.,
2011; Zhang, 2024).

Social and Cultural Reproduction

The twenty-first-century Chinese education system not only
transmits knowledge but also reproduces social inequality through
implicit curricula and socio-cultural mechanisms. One example of
this is the cultural bias identified by Kipnis (2001): rural students are
labeled as "low quality" in schools, and teachers' disciplinary
practices and curricula reinforce this identity. Another significant
issue is the social orientation of vocational education, which is often
regarded as "second-class education." This bias, in turn, limits its
attraction and development potential for rural students (Ling,
2015).Hao et al. (2014) emphasize that the hukou system
disadvantages rural hukou holders in educational stratification.
Furthermore, the intertwined disadvantages of rural household
registration and under-resourced rural schools create systemic
educational inequality. The hukou system places rural residents at
the bottom of the education hierarchy, with its negative impact
intensifying as students’ progress through higher education stages
(Zhan, 2011). This combination reinforces social class solidification,
making it challenging for rural students to achieve upward mobility
(Liu, 2013).While much of the literature critiques the unequal hukou
system, it remains a key barrier to addressing educational
disparities in China (Guo & Chen, 2023). Zhang (2024) suggests
gradually eliminating institutional barriers in employment, medical
care, housing, and education, and breaking the urban-rural dual
economic system to guide the orderly flow of surplus rural labor
between urban and rural areas. However, Kan (2013) emphasizes
the urgent need for systemic reforms to mitigate youth discontent
and inequality, particularly through policies that better support rural
youth in overcoming educational and economic barriers.
By linking these perspectives, it becomes evident that while Zhang
(2024) provides a macro-level vision for dismantling systemic
barriers, Kan (2013) and Hannum et al. (2011) underscore the
micro-level interventions required to address the frustrations and
challenges faced by rural youth in the present. Nonetheless,
achieving these reforms is a complex and gradual process. National
policies of this scale cannot be changed overnight and require
sustained efforts from policymakers and experts to develop
innovative and actionable solutions.

Conclusion
In summary, the urban-rural education gap in China is a complex
issue stemming from structural inequality, resource dependence,
and socio-cultural reproduction. Addressing these challenges
requires policymakers to focus on equitable funding distribution,
reform discriminatory admissions policies, and invest in rural
infrastructure. While technological interventions present potential
solutions, they must be accompanied by systemic policy reforms
and targeted investments.
It is crucial to recognize that technology alone cannot resolve deep-
rooted disparities without tackling underlying structural issues.
Future research should examine the long-term effects of
technological interventions and local education reforms, as well as
how individual institutions can help overcome systemic barriers.
Additionally, understanding the interaction between these
interventions and broader socio-economic factors will be vital for
effective policy design. By combining systemic change with targeted
actions, China can progress toward a more equitable education
system that bridges the urban-rural divide. Ultimately, achieving
educational equity will require sustained commitment, innovative
solutions, and collaborative efforts across all levels of government
and society.

Reference list
Gåsemyr, H. J. (2020). China in the sustainable development
agenda: Contributions to health and education. Norwegian
Institute of International Affairs (NUPI). Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep25740

Guo, J., & Chen, J. (2023). Can China’s Higher Education

Expansion Reduce the Educational Inequality Between Urban and
Rural Areas? The Journal of Higher Education, 94(5), 638–663.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2023.2168408

Hannum, E., An, X., & Cherng, H.-Y. S. (2011). Examinations and
educational opportunity in China: Mobility and bottlenecks for the
rural poor. Oxford Review of Education, 37(2), 267–305. Retrieved
from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23047904
Hao, L., Hu, A., & Lo, J. (2014). Two aspects of the rural-urban
divide and educational stratification in China: A trajectory
analysis. Comparative Education Review, 58(3), 509–536.
https://doi.org/10.1086/676828

Kan, K. (2013). The new “lost generation”: Inequality and

discontent among Chinese youth. China Perspectives, 2(94), 67–
73. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24055557

Kipnis, A. (2001). The disturbing educational discipline of

“peasants.” The China Journal, 46, 1–24.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3182305

Lavely, W., Xiao, Z., Li, B., & Freedman, R. (1990). The rise in
female education in China: National and regional patterns. The
China Quarterly, 121, 61–93. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/654063

Li, J. (2017). Educational policy development in China for the 21st

century: Rationality and challenges in a globalizing age. Chinese
Education & Society, 50(3), 133–141.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2017.1330992

Ling, M. (2015). “Bad students go to vocational schools!”:

Education, social reproduction and migrant youth in urban
China. The China Journal, 73, 108–131.
https://doi.org/10.1086/679271

Liu, Y. (2013). Meritocracy and the Gaokao: A survey study of

higher education selection and socio-economic participation in
East China. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(5/6),
868–887. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43818803

Tsang, M. C. (2000). Education and national development in

China since 1949: Oscillating policies and enduring
dilemmas. China Review, 579–618. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/23453384

Yuan, W., Samsudin, S., Abdullah, B., Farizan, N. H., Hassan, M. Z.,
& Cheng, J. (2023). The value, obstacle and strategy of digital
empowerment physical education in primary school. Journal of
Ecohumanism, 3(7), 2752–2768.
https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i7.4415

Zhan, S. (2011). What determines migrant workers’ life chances

in contemporary China? Hukou, social exclusion, and the
market. Modern China, 37(3), 243–285. http://mcx.sagepub.com

Zhang, T., & Minxia, Z. (2006). Universalizing nine-year

compulsory education for poverty reduction in rural
China. International Review of Education / Internationale
Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft / Revue internationale de
l’éducation, 52(3/4), 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/sll159-006-
0011-z

Zhang, W. (2024). Towards equity: Overcoming educational

disparities faced by China's migrant and left-behind
children. Region - Educational Research and Reviews, 6(7).
https://doi.org/10.32629/rerr.v6i7.2553
Zhiting, Z., Xiaoqing, G., & Qiyun, W. (2003). A panorama of
online education in China. Educational Technology, 43(3), 23–27.
Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44428832