0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views20 pages

Presentation - Where should the Bugs be Fixed

Uploaded by

Sanket Waghmare
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views20 pages

Presentation - Where should the Bugs be Fixed

Uploaded by

Sanket Waghmare
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Where Should the Bugs Be Fixed?

Zhou, J., H. Zhang, and D. Lo.

Presented by: XYZ


Outline
✘ Context
✘ Problem
✘ Solution
✘ Related work/Limitations
✘Approach overview
✘ Validation
Context
summary

metadata

descriptions

The screenshot of Eclipse bug report #339286 got from the Bugzilla website
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=339286
Outline
✘ Context
✘ Problem
✘ Solution
✘ Related work/Limitations
✘Approach overview
✘ Validation
Problem
✘ There are more than 5,041
bug reports created for the
Eclipse project in this year
(from 01-01-2015 to 11-22-
2015). This results in an
average of 15 bug reports per
day.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/

Figure 1. Android bug report from Bugzilla


Outline
✘ Context
✘ Problem
✘ Solution
✘ Related work/Limitations
✘Approach overview
✘ Validation
Solution

Algorithm
Android bug report from Bugzilla

A ranked list of likely


buggy code fragments
Outline
✘ Context
✘ Problem
✘ Solution
✘ Related work/Limitations
✘Approach overview
✘ Validation
Related Work
✘ Similarity between bug
report and source files

✘ Use of Information
Retrieval to calculate the
similarity

Figure 2. A bug report and its relevant source code


file
Related Work
✘LDA: Latent Dirichlet Allocation
✘Sum: Smoothed Unigram Model
✘LSI: Latent Semantic Indexing
✘VSM: Vector Space Model

Figure 3. LDA corpus process


Limitations of existing studies
✘ There is a significant difference between the natural language used in bug
reports and the programming language.
✘Information of previously fixed bug reports can be also used to learn about
potential candidate files if there fixed bug reports are similar to the opened
one.
✘Existing techniques failed to accurately locate the bug.
Outline
✘ Context
✘ Problem
✘ Solution
✘ Related work/Limitations
✘Approach overview
✘ Validation
Approach Overview
✘ Source code files: Source code files may
contain words that are similar to those occurring
in the bug reports.

✘ Software size: When two source files have


similar scores, we need to determine which one
should be ranked higher. They need to assign
higher scores to larger files.

✘ Similar bugs: Examine similar bugs that were


reported and fixed before. It could help them Figure 4.
locate the relevant files for the new bug.
Outline
✘ Context
✘ Problem
✘ Solution
✘ Related work/Limitations
✘Approach overview
✘ Validation
Validation
✘RQ1: How many bugs can be successfully located by BugLocator?
The files are ranked in top 1, top 5 or top 10, we consider the report has been
effectively localized.

✘RQ2: Can BugLocator outperform other bug localization methods?


They compare BugLocator to the bug localization methods implemented using the
same techniques.

✘RQ3: What is the impact of weighting the similarity scores when aggregating
them?
Vary the weight of each score and see the impact on the localization.
Validation
Data Collection

✘ Complete bug and change history

✘ Have different numbers of bugs and


source code files.
Table 1. The studied projects
Comparison Metrics

✘ MRR (Mean Reciprocal Rank).

✘ MAP (Mean Average Precision).


Validation
✘RQ1: How many bugs can be successfully located by BugLocator?

Table 2. The performance of BugLocator

30%, 50% and 60% of effectiveness of Figure 5. The comparison between the results of BugLocator
the proposed approach. and the SUM results given in [32] on AspectJ dataset

[32] S. Rao and A. Kak. Retrieval from software libraries for bug localization: a comparative study of generic and composite text models. In Proceeding of the 8th
working conference on Mining software repositories (MSR'11), ACM, Waikiki, Honolulu, Hawaii, p.43-52, May 2011.
Validation
✘RQ2: Can BugLocator outperform other bug localization methods?

Figure 6. The comparisons between different bug localization methods


Validation
✘ RQ3: What is the impact of weighting the similarity scores when aggregating
them?

You might also like