Apin Reversal
Apin Reversal
SUIT NO:
BETWEEN
Note:
If the Defendant does not respond within the time and at the place
Page 2 of 10
above mentioned, such orders will be made and proceedings may be
taken as the judge may think just and expedient
Dated this 4th day of February, 2025
_____________________
____
Margaret Belawu,
Esq
Ifeoluwa Olatilewa Adigun, Esq
Ayodeji Timothy, Esq
COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT
Adigun & Ayodeji (LP)
Suite 112, Jinifa Plaza, CBD
09066972257,
08171720498
[email protected]
FOR SERVICE ON:
1ST RESPONDENT
UBA Bank Ltd
Abuja
Page 3 of 10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY
IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION
HOLDEN AT ABUJA
SUIT NO:
BETWEEN
Page 4 of 10
6. The Applicant further certify that the said document were
downloaded by printing out from a Computer which is more
specifically described below.
Page 5 of 10
b. An Order of this Honourable Court authorizing and/or
directing the 1st Respondent to place the 2nd
Respondent’s Account No. 1023045452 belonging to the
2nd Respondent namely Cumbamed Associates on debit
restriction to wit Post No Debit, and to continuously use all
the cash inflows therein to credit the FirstBank Account
No. 2042162098 domiciled with the FirstBank until the
final reversal of the said sum of N21,685,171.20 (Twenty
One Million Six Hundred and Eighty Five Thousand
One Hundred and Seventy One Naira, Twenty Kobo
Only) being the total of the Applicant’s monies transferred
wrongfully and without any legal/contractual basis into the
said UBA Bank Account No. 1023045452 belonging to
the 2nd Respondent
AND SUCH FURTHER ORDER AS THIS COURT MAY
DEEM FIT TO MAKE IN THIS CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS
SUIT
__________________
DEPONENT
Sworn to at the FCT High Court Registry,
ABUJA, this day of 2025
BEFORE ME
Page 6 of 10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY
IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION
HOLDEN AT ABUJA
SUIT NO:
BETWEEN
1.0. Introduction:
Page 8 of 10
3.4. The principles of natural justice dictate that a party should not
be allowed to profit from such mistake made by the
Applicant. The courts, in their equitable jurisdiction, have
consistently upheld the need to rectify financial mistakes by
directing the restitution of funds to their rightful owners. The
case of Central Bank of Nigeria v. Beckiti Construction
Ltd. [2011] 5 NWLR [Pt. 1240] 203 underscores this
principle, where the court emphasized that restitutio in
integrum denotes the restoration of the parties to the position
they were in before the mistaken act occurred.
3.5. It is, therefore, submitted that this Honorable Court has the
authority and jurisdiction to order the reversal of the
unauthorized funds to the Applicant’s account.
Page 9 of 10
legal claim to the funds, and any delay in reversing the
funds will result in continued financial hardship for the
Applicant.
4.0. Conclusion
4.1. My Lord, based on the foregoing, it is respectfully submitted
that this Honorable Court has the authority and jurisdiction to
grant the reliefs sought in the Applicant’s Originating
Summons. The court's intervention is necessary to rectify the
financial injustice caused by the unauthorized withdrawal and
transfer of the Applicant's funds, and to prevent any
dissipation of the said funds.
_____________________
____
Margaret Belawu,
Esq
Ifeoluwa Olatilewa Adigun, Esq
Ayodeji Timothy, Esq
COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT
Adigun & Ayodeji (LP)
Suite 112, Jinifa Plaza, CBD
09066972257,
08171720498
[email protected]
FOR SERVICE ON:
1ST RESPONDENT
UBA Bank Ltd
Abuja
Page 10 of 10