Handbook of Social Resource Theory Theoretical Extensions, Empirical Insights, and Social Applications Entire Volume Download
Handbook of Social Resource Theory Theoretical Extensions, Empirical Insights, and Social Applications Entire Volume Download
Visit the link below to download the full version of this book:
https://medipdf.com/product/handbook-of-social-resource-theory-theoretical-exten
sions-empirical-insights-and-social-applications/
ISSN 1572-1906
ISBN 978-1-4614-4174-8 ISBN 978-1-4614-4175-5 (eBook)
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-4175-5
Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London
I was enormously impressed when I first read Foa and Foa’s Resource Theory
of Social Exchange in 1980. It seemed to me that it opened up an area in
social psychology which had largely been ignored. It shed new light on an
important aspect of social interaction – the resources being exchanged – and
it formulated many interesting, testable hypotheses. As I read their writings,
I had various quibbles with it. For example, I did not think their list of catego-
ries of resources was exhaustive. I also thought “negative resources” was not
simply the opposite of “positive resources” in kind or the reactions they
would elicit, etc. Nevertheless, I thought it was an important and valuable
theory, but I ignored it even though I now realize it was an important comple-
ment to some of the theoretical ideas I had developed (presented in Deutsch
1982; reprinted in Coleman 2011). Other social psychologists also largely
neglected it. So I am delighted to see this rich volume of papers, by distin-
guished contributors, that take the Foa and Foa theory as the jumping off
point for revising, amplifying, or absorbing into larger theories.
I will briefly indicate how my theoretical work on interdependence and
psychological orientation could have benefitted from the work of Foa and
Foa. My theoretical work here had two key aspects: characterizing the dimen-
sions of social relations and characterizing the nature of psychological orien-
tations. It postulated that one’s psychological orientation had to fit the social
relations one is in, and a lack of fit would produce change in the relation and/
or one’s psychological orientation. Thus, your psychological orientation
when you are involved in love-making with your spouse is quite different
than when you are bargaining with a used car salesman, and unless you
change your psychological orientation as you move from one situation to the
other, you will produce radical changes in the new situation.
I characterized social relations in terms of their location on five dimen-
sions: cooperation-competition, power equality, task-oriented versus social-
emotional, formal-informal, and importance. In my view, a psychological
orientation was composed of the following interrelated components: cogni-
tive, motivational, moral, and action. For details, see my paper in Coleman
(2011). If you take a social relationship that is cooperative, equal, social-
emotional, informal, and important, it is likely that the resource of love will
be dominant in the interaction. On the other hand, if in the prior listing you
change “social-emotional” to “task-oriented,” information will be dominant.
In preparing this foreword, and renewing my interest in the ideas of Foa and
Foa, I have found that their ideas could have been an important contribution to
v
vi Foreword
my work. In the many excellent chapters in this book, you will learn of the
scholars who have been influenced by their work and the far-reaching implica-
tions of their ideas.
References
Coleman, P. (2011). Conflict, interdependence, and justice: The intellectual legacy of
Morton Deutsch. New York: Springer.
Deutsch, M. (1982). Interdependence and psychological orientation. In V. Derlaga & J.L.
Grzelek (Eds.), Cooperative and helping behavior: Theories and research (pp. 15–42).
Academic Press.
Foa, E. B., & Foa, V. G. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior exchange. In K.
J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory
and research. New York: Plenum.
vii
viii Contents
Part VI Envoi
Nick Berigan received his Ph.D. from the University of South Carolina and
currently teaches at East Tennessee State University. His research uses both
experimental and applied settings to study how trust, fairness, and interper-
sonal motives affect strategic behavior.
xi
xii About the Contributors
her Ph.D. in clinical psychology at Kent State University in 2005, after com-
pleting her clinical internship at the National Crime Victims Center at the
Medical University of South Carolina, where she specialized in treating child
and adult survivors of physical and sexual abuse. Dr. Doane completed a
postdoctoral fellowship at Case Western Reserve University, where she served
as program coordinator of the PTSD Treatment and Research Program, and
co-investigator on a federally funded randomized clinical trial comparing the
effectiveness of psychotherapy versus medication for adults with PTSD. She
has received funding from the National Institute of Mental Health to study
changes in trauma-related beliefs during treatment for PTSD. Her current
research focuses on examining the process of change in therapy, patient pref-
erences for treatments, as well as expanding access to empirically supported
treatments for trauma survivors.
Uriel G. Foa (February 25, 1916–January 15, 1990), born in Italy, was a
professor and professor emeritus of psychology, 1971–1990, at Temple
University, Philadelphia. He received his Ph.D. from the Hebrew University
of Jerusalem and prior to his tenure at Temple University he taught at the
universities of Bar Ilan, Israel (1958–1965), Illinois-Urbana (1965–1967) and
Missouri-Columbia (1967–1971). His many publications in professional
journals and books covered a broad variety of topics in personality, social
psychology, and methodology. The first paper of Professor Foa’s resource
theory of social exchange was published in Science 1971. He continued to
develop this theory and conducted studies to examine its empirical validity
with his wife Edna B. Foa. This work was culminated in a book entitled
Societal Structures of the Mind they coauthored and published in 1974. This
book is one of the most frequently quoted books in social psychology.
Professor Foa founded the Israel Institute of Applied Social Research, and
was its executive director until 1965 when he moved to the USA. Dr. Foa
received several awards for his work, and he was a fellow of the American
Psychological Association, the American Association for the Advancement
of Science, and the New York Academy of Science.