L.L.

B Sem II ( Family Law )

Unit 1
Concept of Property: Definition, Scope, and Evolution

Property in legal terms is a broad concept that encompasses both tangible and intangible
assets over which an individual or entity may exercise ownership rights, including
possession, use, and disposal. The rights associated with property are generally recognized
and protected by law, often allowing for the transfer, encumbrance, or alienation of property.
The concept of property has evolved significantly over time, as society's needs and
economic structures have changed, leading to new forms of property being recognized.

1. Traditional Forms of Property

Historically, property was primarily associated with land and movables (such as goods,
chattels, etc.), with the rights over them being classified into ownership (the right to use,
exclude others, and transfer), possession (actual physical control), and enjoyment (the
benefit derived from use).

The Civil Law and Common Law traditions have historically upheld the concept of property
in these tangible forms. Ownership rights are typically protected by the doctrine of adverse
possession (in common law) or prescriptive rights (in civil law), where continued use or
control of property may lead to the acquisition of ownership rights.

2. Evolution of the Property Concept

Over time, the concept of property has evolved beyond mere physical assets to include
intangible assets like intellectual property and even personal rights. This evolution is
particularly notable in legal systems that adapt to emerging economic and technological
developments. For example:

 Intellectual Property (IP): Legal systems have developed frameworks to recognize

rights over intangible assets such as patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade
secrets, which are viewed as "property" despite not being physically tangible. The
Berne Convention (1886) and the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property
Rights (TRIPS) under the World Trade Organization (WTO) are major
international agreements that have solidified intellectual property as a form of
property.
 Digital Property: With the rise of the internet, digital assets such as domain names,
digital currencies (cryptocurrencies), and virtual property (in video games or
virtual worlds) have also been recognized as forms of property. Jurisdictions
worldwide are increasingly considering cryptocurrency (like Bitcoin) as property
under existing frameworks.

Page 1 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

3. New Property Concepts: Skill, Job, and Other Intangibles

3.1 Skill as Property

Skills, knowledge, and expertise have come to be viewed as forms of personal property, often
categorized as human capital. The value derived from skills is recognized as intangible
property, often governed by employment law, contract law, and intellectual property laws.

 Human Capital: In modern economies, the concept of human capital (skills, talents,
education, and experience) is crucial. While skills themselves may not be directly
transferable like land or goods, employment contracts and non-compete
agreements often provide that certain skills or intellectual creations developed by an
employee belong to the employer or are subject to compensation.
 Contracts and Employment: Under the law of contracts, employment agreements
may specify the transfer of specific skills or knowledge developed during
employment. This creates a framework where the "skill" can be viewed as an asset of
the individual, which may be contracted, sold, or shared in return for compensation.
 Non-Compete and Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs): Employers often protect
skills and knowledge developed by employees under such agreements, restricting the
use of the same skills by employees in competing ventures. These agreements
recognize that skills, while personal, have value akin to property.

3.2 Job and Employment as Property

The concept of employment has increasingly been interpreted in ways that reflect a
property-like relationship between individuals and their jobs.

 Right to Employment: The right to work has been viewed as an inherent human
right, but in legal terms, the right to a job can be seen as a form of property in terms
of economic rights and protections under various national labor laws. The
International Labour Organization (ILO), in its conventions and
recommendations, recognizes employment as a form of social property.
 Property Rights in Labor: In jurisdictions with labor unions, the labor force can
exert collective ownership or control over certain employment rights. For instance,
unionized workers may possess collective rights akin to a property interest in their
employment conditions. The right to organize and bargain collectively under the
National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) in the United States reflects this.

3.3 Data and Information as Property

In the digital age, personal data and information are considered valuable assets, leading to
the emergence of data as property.

 Data Ownership: Laws surrounding personal data, like the General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union, recognize the value of personal
information and provide for its protection, transfer, and sometimes its right to be
erased (right to be forgotten). Companies that collect and process data often treat this
data as a type of property, with individuals holding limited control over how their
personal data is used.

Page 2 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

 Intellectual Property in Data: The legal framework surrounding data ownership is

an ongoing issue. Data rights are considered property in some legal systems, where
individuals and businesses may sell, trade, or monetize data in specific regulated
contexts.

4. Legal Framework and Application of New Property Concepts

The legal recognition of new property concepts is largely driven by the evolving
understanding of what constitutes an asset of value in society. These concepts require
modifications and expansions in existing legal frameworks, including:

 Contract Law: Contracts continue to be pivotal in establishing the ownership and

transfer of rights over new forms of property. Licensing agreements (for software,
patents, etc.) and employment contracts often contain provisions governing
intangible property like knowledge, skills, or information.
 Employment Law: This body of law reflects the legal boundaries of personal
property rights in relation to employment. Employment law protects the intellectual
property generated by an employee and specifies the conditions under which it can
be transferred or used.
 Intellectual Property Law: Laws related to copyrights, patents, and trademarks
continue to adapt to new forms of property. For example, artificial intelligence (AI)-
generated content is a current area of legal debate regarding ownership and rights.
 Data Privacy Law: With laws like GDPR and California Consumer Privacy Act
(CCPA), there is an evolving perspective on personal data as property, giving
individuals greater control over how their data is used and shared.

Conclusion

The concept of property has evolved from being a purely physical notion tied to land and
goods to a more complex and nuanced framework encompassing intangible assets, such as
skills, knowledge, jobs, and digital property. This transformation reflects society’s shift
towards a more knowledge-based economy and the increasing value placed on intangible
assets. Legal systems continue to adapt, creating new mechanisms to protect and regulate
these emerging forms of property, recognizing the increasing importance of non-physical
assets in today’s world.

The recognition of these forms of property — such as skills, jobs, and data — has significant
implications for both individual rights and economic transactions, and ongoing legal
reforms will likely continue to address these emerging issues

Unit 2
Inheritance under Hindu Law: A Historical Perspective

Inheritance under Hindu law has a long and rich tradition that is rooted in the Dharma
Shastras, particularly the Manusmriti, Yajnavalkya Smriti, and Mitakshara and
Dayabhaga schools of Hindu law. Historically, Hindu succession laws were highly
influenced by religious and social norms, with a strong emphasis on family ties, particularly
the role of male heirs in maintaining the family’s honor and legacy.

Page 3 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

1. Historical Perspective of Traditional Hindu Law

1.1 The Vedic Period and Dharma Shastras

In the Vedic period, property rights were based primarily on religious and societal roles. The
Manusmriti (circa 200 BCE - 200 CE) is one of the most influential texts in Hindu law and
presents a model of inheritance that was mainly geared toward the male members of the
family, with the son being the primary heir.

The inheritance system during this period was based on the concept of family property, and
it was the responsibility of male heirs to perform funeral rites and ensure the continuity of
the family line. The Dharma Shastras thus emphasized the patriarchal nature of
inheritance, with women having limited property rights.

1.2 The Mitakshara and Dayabhaga Schools

The two main schools of Hindu law on inheritance were:

 Mitakshara: This system, predominantly followed in most parts of India (except

Bengal), was based on the concept of coparcenary. Under Mitakshara, male heirs
formed a coparcenary (joint family), and they inherited property jointly. The
inheritance rights were tied to the birthright of male members in the family, meaning
that property could not be partitioned until the father or the Karta of the family
decided to do so. It also focused on the concept of ancestral property, which
belonged to a family and was inherited by male descendants, including sons,
grandsons, and great-grandsons.
 Dayabhaga: This school of law, followed in Bengal and parts of Assam, was more
egalitarian in its approach. It allowed for the separate ownership of property and
allowed the daughter to inherit property as an equal member of the family. In this
system, the rights of a son and daughter were more equal, though the law was still
predominantly male-oriented in the distribution of property.

1.3 Women’s Rights in Traditional Hindu Inheritance

Historically, women had very limited rights to inherit property under traditional Hindu law.
In the Mitakshara school, a woman’s inheritance rights were secondary, often dependent on
being widowed or having specific property rights granted through the father's will or family
arrangements. The situation was slightly better in Dayabhaga, where women were entitled
to inherit property as coparceners, but the practice was still largely patriarchal in nature.

Stridhan, or property given to a woman at the time of marriage, was considered the woman's
separate property, but this did not include the right to inherit ancestral property, except under
specific circumstances.

2. The Hindu Succession Act, 1956

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 was enacted to modernize the inheritance system in India
and address the rights of women, as well as the complexities of joint family property. The Act
consolidated and amended the laws relating to the succession of property of Hindus and

Page 4 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

addressed issues that arose from the disparities in inheritance rights between men and
women.

The Act applies to all Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs, and it is primarily concerned with
the succession to property of a Hindu male or female who dies either testate (with a will) or
intestate (without a will).

2.1 Scope and Purpose of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956

The main objectives of the Hindu Succession Act were:

 To unify the laws relating to the inheritance of property among Hindus.

 To remove discrimination based on gender and to provide more equal inheritance
rights to women, particularly with regard to ancestral property.
 To provide a uniform system for the distribution of property and the succession of
property in cases of intestacy.

3. Succession to Property of a Hindu Male Dying Intestate under the Hindu Succession
Act, 1956

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, provides a detailed framework for the succession of
property of a Hindu male who dies intestate (without a will). The Act distinguishes between
legal heirs based on their relationship to the deceased.

3.1 Class I Heirs:

Under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, a Hindu male dying intestate will first pass
his property to his Class I heirs. These heirs have equal rights to the property, and they
include:

1. Mother
2. Wife
3. Son
4. Daughter
5. Daughter's son
6. Son's daughter
7. Sons of pre-deceased sons (grandsons)
8. Sons of pre-deceased daughters (granddaughters)

These heirs share the property equally.

3.2 Class II Heirs:

If there are no Class I heirs, the property will pass to the Class II heirs, as enumerated in
Schedule II of the Act. These heirs include:

 Father
 Brother
 Sister
 Nephew, Niece, and others.

Page 5 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

Class II heirs inherit the property in a specified order.

3.3 Agnates and Cognates:

If there are no Class I or Class II heirs, the property will pass to the agnates (relatives related
through males) and then to the cognates (relatives related through females). Agnates have
precedence over cognates in the distribution of property.

3.4 Rights of a Widow (Section 14)

The widow of a Hindu male is granted equal property rights as a Class I heir under the
Hindu Succession Act. However, before the 1956 Act, the widow had only limited rights in
the property of her deceased husband. Under Section 14 of the Act, a widow is entitled to
inherit the same share as a son, and she may hold property independently of her husband's
family.

 The widow's right to inherit property is established as a full ownership right under
the law, rather than just a life interest as under the old law.
 A widow's maintenance is also prioritized, and she has the right to claim
maintenance out of the estate until it is distributed.

3.5 Coparcenary Property and Rights of Daughters (Section 6)

The most significant reform introduced by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 was in the
context of coparcenary property. Before the Act, daughters had no right to inherit ancestral
property in a Mitakshara coparcenary. However, Section 6 of the Act, which was later
amended in 2005, provides that:

 A daughter is considered a coparcener in the same manner as a son.

 Daughters now have equal rights to inherit ancestral property and can demand a
partition of the family property.
 This amendment significantly altered the traditional structure of Hindu inheritance
law and granted women equal standing with men in terms of succession.

4. Conclusion

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, marks a critical turning point in the legal landscape of
inheritance for Hindus in India. It sought to create a more egalitarian system, particularly by
recognizing equal rights for women in matters of inheritance. The provisions for daughters
as coparceners and the widow’s rights under the Act were revolutionary reforms that aimed
to remove outdated patriarchal practices.

The succession to property of a Hindu male dying intestate is governed by clear legal
structures under the Act, dividing heirs into Class I and Class II, with equal inheritance
rights among those in Class I, such as the wife, son, and daughter. This evolution of
inheritance law reflects both social progress and legal reform to address gender inequality
and ensure fair distribution of property within Hindu families

Page 6 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

Unit 3
Devolution of Interest in Mitakshara Coparcenary with Reference to the Provisions of
the Hindu Succession Act, 1956

The Mitakshara coparcenary is a unique feature of Hindu law, specifically under the
Mitakshara school of inheritance, which has its roots in ancient Hindu law. The concept
revolves around a joint family system, where property is held jointly by male members, with
the common goal of preserving the ancestral estate. A coparcenary consists of male
descendants of a common ancestor, who share a right by birth in the joint family property.
This structure is significant in understanding the devolution of interest in the coparcenary.

With the enactment of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the devolution of interest in a
Mitakshara coparcenary underwent important legal changes, particularly with the
introduction of Section 6 of the Act (which was later amended in 2005). These changes
have had profound effects on how property in a coparcenary devolves, including the impact
on female heirs.

1. Historical Background of the Mitakshara Coparcenary System

Under the traditional Mitakshara system, the male descendants of a Hindu male shared an
equal right by birth in the ancestral property. These coparceners included the father, son,
grandson, and great-grandson. The father was the Karta (manager) of the joint family
property, and the male descendants formed a joint family, typically holding property together,
without dividing it.

 A coparcener’s right to property was by birth, meaning a son, grandson, or great-

grandson had a birthright to the ancestral property, even before any partition
occurred.
 The Karta’s authority to manage the property did not extend to making a unilateral
decision about the property’s succession or distribution. Partition could only take
place when all coparceners agreed.

2. Impact of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 on the Mitakshara Coparcenary

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 aimed at modernizing and reforming Hindu inheritance
law. The provisions of the Act specifically addressed the devolution of interest in
Mitakshara coparcenary property, impacting both male and female coparceners. The most
notable change was the recognition of women’s rights in the coparcenary, which had
previously been a male-only domain.

2.1 Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, specifically deals with the devolution of
interest in the Mitakshara coparcenary. Before the Act, only male descendants had the right
to inherit or demand a partition of ancestral property. However, Section 6 revolutionized this
by introducing the concept of equal coparcenary rights for daughters alongside sons.

Page 7 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

Key Provisions of Section 6:

1. Daughter as a Coparcener:
o The most significant change introduced by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956
(through its 2005 amendment) was that daughters of a Hindu male coparcener
were given equal rights in the coparcenary property, the same as that of a son.
This was a critical departure from the traditional Mitakshara law, where
daughters had no right to claim a share in ancestral property.
o As per the amendment, daughters are now treated as coparceners by birth,
making them equal participants in the family estate, subject to the same rights
as male coparceners.
2. Devolution of Coparcenary Property:
o The section provides that the interest of a coparcener in a Mitakshara
coparcenary property will devolve on the legal heirs when a coparcener dies
intestate. The legal heirs will include both male and female heirs, following
the succession rules under Section 8 and Class I heirs provisions of the Act.
o If the coparcener dies intestate, his share in the joint family property will pass
on to his legal heirs, which includes his son, daughter, and wife as per the
Act’s provisions.
3. Equal Rights of Daughters:
o Prior to the 2005 amendment of Section 6, daughters had no claim to
ancestral property unless the father had made a will or some arrangement.
Now, daughters have the same rights as sons regarding the right to demand
partition and inheritance in ancestral property.
o Daughters, like sons, have a birthright in the coparcenary property, meaning
they hold an equal share in the joint family property, and upon partition, they
are entitled to claim a share.
o This change empowers women to take an active role in family property
matters and contributes to gender equality within the legal framework of
inheritance.
4. Partition:
o When a coparcener dies, his share in the coparcenary property is subject to
partition, either by mutual agreement or by the legal heirs filing a partition
suit.
o Under Section 6, daughters are entitled to a share in the property as if they
were sons, and they can demand partition of the family property. This ensures
that women have the right to an equal share in the property, just like their
male counterparts.
5. Special Provisions for Women:
o In case of the death of a coparcener before partition, the daughter (if alive)
will have the same right as the son in the property of the coparcener, and she
will get an equal share in the coparcenary property.
o The rights of daughters to inheritance are also clarified in Section 6(3) of the
Act, which ensures that their inheritance rights are preserved under all
circumstances.

Page 8 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

2.2 Devolution of Property of a Hindu Male Dying Intestate

Under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the property of a Hindu male dying intestate
(without a will) is to be distributed as per the rules laid out in Sections 8 to 12 of the Act.
This distribution applies to Mitakshara coparcenary property as well.

 If a Hindu male dies intestate, his share in the coparcenary property passes
according to the following rules:
1. Class I heirs: The property first devolves upon the Class I heirs, which
include the wife, sons, daughters, and mother of the deceased coparcener, all
of whom share the property equally.
2. Partition of Coparcenary Property: The interest of a deceased coparcener
is treated as a separate share, and the share will be passed on to his legal
heirs. The coparcener’s share is determined at the time of his death, and it will
include both sons and daughters.
3. Inheritance by Daughters: In case the coparcener is deceased before the
enactment of the 2005 amendment, his daughters can still inherit his share,
but the exact procedures may require litigation or specific legal provisions
based on the jurisdiction.

3. Legal Impact and Gender Equality

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 was a significant step in addressing the gender disparity in
the Mitakshara coparcenary. By giving daughters the same rights as sons, the law sought
to ensure gender equality and empower women in the family context. This change was long
overdue and marks a transformative shift in Hindu inheritance law.

 Before the amendment, daughters were excluded from the coparcenary system, which
led to unequal distribution of family property. Now, they have the right to claim an
equal share and demand partition if necessary.

4. Conclusion

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, particularly Section 6, revolutionized the Mitakshara
coparcenary system by granting daughters equal coparcenary rights. This reform ensures
gender equality in inheritance matters, allowing women to inherit ancestral property on par
with their male counterparts. The provisions also clarify the devolution of interest in the
coparcenary and make the succession process more transparent and equitable, reflecting
modern societal norms and advancing the principle of equal rights for all heirs in Hindu law

Unit 4
Succession to Property of Hindu Female Dying Intestate under the Hindu Succession
Act, 1956

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (HSA) governs the laws regarding inheritance and
succession to property among Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs. The Act specifically lays
down provisions concerning the property of a Hindu female who dies intestate (i.e., without a
will).

Page 9 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

1. General Rules of Succession for Hindu Female (Section 15)

Under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the property of a Hindu female dying
intestate shall devolve in the following manner:

 First Priority (Section 15(1)(a)): The property will first be inherited by her children
(sons and daughters), and the husband, if alive. The property will be divided
equally among them.
 Second Priority (Section 15(1)(b)): If the Hindu female has no children or husband
at the time of her death, the property will devolve upon her parents (father and
mother), and if both of them are deceased, it will pass to her brothers and sisters.
 Third Priority (Section 15(1)(c)): If there is no one in the first and second
categories, then the property will devolve upon the heirs of her father (i.e., paternal
heirs), followed by the heirs of her mother (i.e., maternal heirs). The property will
pass to the heirs of the maternal or paternal side based on the relevant inheritance
rules.
 Special Provisions under Section 15(2): A Hindu female’s property can pass to the
heirs of her husband in certain cases. Specifically, if the property was inherited from
her husband, it will be passed on to her husband's heirs in the absence of the female’s
own heirs (i.e., children, parents, or siblings).

2. Disqualifications Relating to Succession (Section 25)

Section 25 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, specifically deals with the disqualifications
for inheritance:

 Section 25(1): A person who commits murder or has participated in the murder of
a person from whom they stand to inherit will be disqualified from inheriting the
property of the deceased.
 Section 25(2): Similarly, any person who has been convicted of an offense involving
moral turpitude, or one who has been declared unfit to inherit under the personal
law, will be disqualified from inheriting the deceased’s property.

3. Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005

The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 brought several significant changes to the
Hindu Succession Act, particularly relating to the succession rights of Hindu females.

 Section 6 – Equal Rights for Daughters in Coparcenary Property: The

Amendment granted daughters the same rights and liabilities as sons in the ancestral
property. This means that daughters, irrespective of their marital status, have equal
rights in the coparcenary property of the family, and this provision applies
retroactively. Daughters now have a share in the joint Hindu family property
(coparcenary property), and they are entitled to demand a partition in the property.
 Section 15(1) – Inclusion of Rights of Daughters: Prior to the Amendment Act, the
property of a Hindu female dying intestate could not pass to her children unless she
had inherited property from her husband. The Amendment sought to equalize the
rights of daughters, making them direct heirs to their mother's property, irrespective
of the source of the property.

Page 10 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

 Section 14 – Women's Estate: Prior to the amendment, a Hindu female could only
possess the property as a life estate and was not entitled to dispose of the property by
way of a will. After the Amendment, any property held by a Hindu female, either in
her capacity as a widow or as an owner, is now treated as absolute property, which
she can dispose of or transfer according to her wishes.

4. General Rules of Succession under the Act

The general rules of succession for Hindus, as provided under the Hindu Succession Act,
1956, are as follows:

 Class I Heirs: These are the first category of legal heirs and include the children
(sons and daughters), husband, and mother of the deceased female. Class I heirs will
inherit the property equally, with the property being divided among them based on the
number of heirs.
 Class II Heirs: These are the next group of heirs who inherit only in the absence of
Class I heirs. Class II includes the father, brothers, sisters, and other relatives as
specified by the Act. Class II heirs will inherit property only when the deceased
female does not have any Class I heirs.
 Class III Heirs (Agnates and Cognates): This category includes distant relatives
like uncles, aunts, cousins, and other collateral relations. They inherit only in the
absence of Class I and Class II heirs.
 Distribution of Property:
o The property is divided equally among Class I heirs.
o If the property passes to Class II heirs, then the property is divided according
to their respective shares as per the guidelines in the Act.

5. Case Laws and Judicial Interpretations

 M. A. Mohamed Kunhi v. V. K. Mohammed (2001): This case emphasized the

importance of the Amendment Act of 2005, particularly the retrospective nature of the
law, granting daughters the right to inherit coparcenary property.
 D. N. Raju v. D. K. Raju (2017): The Supreme Court held that after the amendment,
the rights of daughters in ancestral property are equal to those of sons, irrespective of
whether the father was alive or not.

Conclusion

In summary, under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the succession to the property of a
Hindu female dying intestate depends on the priority of heirs, starting with the children and
husband, followed by parents and siblings, and then other collateral heirs. The Hindu
Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 significantly enhanced the rights of daughters by
providing them equal inheritance rights in coparcenary property and removing the prior
limitations regarding women's estates. Additionally, the Act disqualifies certain persons (such
as murderers or those convicted of certain crimes) from inheriting the property of the
deceased

Page 11 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

Unit 5
Disqualifications and General Principles under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (HSA) lays down rules regarding the inheritance and
succession of property among Hindus. Within the framework of succession, certain
disqualifications exist, which prevent an individual from inheriting property under the
provisions of the Act. Moreover, there are general principles that guide how succession
takes place in the absence of a will (intestate succession).

1. Disqualifications Relating to Succession (Section 25 of the HSA)

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, specifically contains provisions related to disqualifications
for succession under Section 25. This section stipulates that individuals who have committed
certain wrongful acts will be disqualified from inheriting property under the Act. These
disqualifications ensure that inheritance does not pass to individuals who have demonstrated
criminal conduct that invalidates their claim to a deceased person's estate.

Section 25 - Disqualification for Succession

 Section 25(1): The Act disqualifies a person from inheriting if that person has been
convicted of the murder of the person from whom the property is inherited or if the
person is involved in the commission of murder. This applies whether the person is a
direct heir or a collateral relative of the deceased.

Legal Reference:
The provision reflects the public policy of denying inheritance to someone who has
committed a serious crime against the decedent. The rationale behind this
disqualification is rooted in the moral turpitude of the act and the need to deter such
unlawful conduct.

Example: If a son murders his father, he is disqualified from inheriting his father’s
property under the Act, even if he would otherwise be an heir.

 Section 25(2): A person who has been convicted of an offense involving moral
turpitude (i.e., one that is reprehensible and considered vile or dishonorable) is also
disqualified from inheriting property. The disqualification is not limited to murder
alone but extends to any serious criminal act that would undermine the individual's
right to claim inheritance.

Legal Reference:
An offense involving moral turpitude is an offense considered inherently immoral,
which could include crimes such as fraud, corruption, or offenses that severely harm
the reputation of the decedent’s family.

Example: If a person is convicted of embezzling funds or defrauding someone in a

way that severely damages the trust and standing of the family, that individual could
be disqualified from inheritance.

Page 12 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

General Disqualification Rule:

 Murder or Participation in Murder: The law is explicit in stating that if a person is

convicted for the murder of the person whose property is being inherited, such a
person shall not inherit the property, even if they are the legal heir.

Legal Reference:
This rule is designed to ensure that a person who wrongfully causes the death of
another cannot benefit from the death by inheriting the estate.

Exceptions:

 The disqualification only applies if the individual is convicted of the crime. If the
individual is acquitted or not involved in the criminal act, they retain their right to
inherit.
 The Act does not apply disqualifications based on mere allegations or pending
charges. A conviction in a court of law is required for disqualification to occur.

2. General Principles of Succession under the Hindu Succession Act

The general principles of succession under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, deal with how
property is distributed among heirs in the absence of a will. These principles follow a
hierarchical pattern, starting with the closest heirs and expanding to more distant ones when
necessary.

Principle 1: Classifications of Heirs

The Hindu Succession Act divides heirs into three main classes based on the priority of
their claim to the deceased's property:

 Class I Heirs (Section 8): These are the first category of heirs who inherit the
property in preference to all others. The Class I heirs include:
o Sons
o Daughters
o Husband
o Mother
o Children of pre-deceased sons or daughters
o Other specified relatives

The property is divided equally among these heirs, and in the absence of any Class I
heirs, the property will pass to Class II heirs.

 Class II Heirs: If there are no Class I heirs, the property will pass to the Class II
heirs. These include the father, brothers, sisters, and other relatives as prescribed in
the law.
 Class III and IV Heirs: These categories include more distant relatives, such as
agnates and cognates, who inherit only in the absence of Class I and II heirs.

Principle 2: Rule of Representation (Representation by Descendants)

Page 13 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

When an heir has predeceased the deceased, the representational rule allows their
descendants to inherit the property. For example, if a son predeceases the father, the son's
children (grandchildren) will inherit the share that would have gone to their father.

Legal Reference:
This rule ensures that descendants of a predeceased heir are not disinherited, preserving the
inheritance rights of family lines.

Principle 3: Succession by Will or Intestate Succession

 Intestate Succession: If a Hindu female dies intestate (without a will), the property
will devolve according to the rules laid out in Section 15 of the Hindu Succession
Act. This section prioritizes the distribution of property among Class I heirs and, in
their absence, the heirs of the father or mother.
 Testate Succession: If a Hindu female dies testate (with a valid will), the property
will pass according to the terms of the will, provided the will is valid and executed
according to legal formalities.

Principle 4: Right of Daughters in Coparcenary Property

The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, altered the rules governing daughters'
inheritance rights, granting daughters the same rights as sons in coparcenary property. This
ensures that daughters, upon their father’s death, have equal rights to inherit the family’s
ancestral property, and they have the right to demand partition of the property.

Legal Reference:
Section 6 of the Amendment Act specifically declares that daughters shall be treated as
coparceners in the same manner as sons. This provision also applies retrospectively to
daughters born before the amendment.

Principle 5: Devolution of Property

 Self-Acquired Property: If the property is self-acquired, it devolves as per the

individual's will or, in the absence of a will, based on intestate succession laws.
 Ancestral or Joint Family Property: Property that is part of a joint Hindu family or
ancestral property follows specific rules of coparcenary and partition.

Principle 6: Right of Female Heirs

 Female heirs (wives, daughters, mothers) have a right to inherit property, but their
right has evolved significantly post the 2005 Amendment, which granted them the
same coparcenary rights as sons. Before the amendment, females were often given
only a life estate in the property, limiting their ability to dispose of it freely. However,
post-amendment, females can now inherit absolute ownership of property, which
includes the ability to sell, gift, or transfer the property as they wish.

Conclusion

The disqualifications for inheritance under the Hindu Succession Act, particularly Section
25, ensure that individuals who commit morally reprehensible acts such as murder or crimes

Page 14 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

of moral turpitude are prevented from benefiting from the deceased's estate. The general
principles of succession ensure a hierarchical and equitable distribution of property among
heirs, with clear distinctions based on proximity of relationship and the presence or absence
of a will. Furthermore, the 2005 Amendment greatly enhanced the rights of daughters in
coparcenary property, making the principles of succession more equitable and gender-neutral.

Unit 6
Muslim Law of Inheritance and Succession

The Muslim Law of Inheritance is a body of principles derived from Islamic religious texts
and traditions. It governs how a Muslim's estate is divided after death, ensuring that the
property is distributed in a manner that adheres to Islamic principles. This law applies to both
Sunnis and Shias, but there are significant differences in the way inheritance is treated under
Sunni and Shia law. The key sources of Islamic inheritance law are the Quran, the Hadith
(sayings of Prophet Muhammad), and the Ijma (consensus of scholars).

1. Rules Governing Sunni and Shia Law of Inheritance

Sunni Law of Inheritance

Sunni law, followed by the majority of Muslims (around 85-90%), is based primarily on the
Quran and Hadith, as well as interpretations of Islamic jurists. Sunni inheritance law can be
understood through two main principles: fixed shares and the residuary principle.

 Fixed Shares: Under Sunni law, certain heirs have fixed shares of the estate, as
outlined in the Quran. These shares are based on the relationship of the heir to the
deceased and are clearly specified.

Key heirs and their shares include:

o Husband: 1/4 if there are children, and 1/2 if there are no children.
o Wife: 1/8 if there are children, and 1/4 if there are no children.
o Children: Sons inherit twice the share of daughters (2:1 ratio). Sons are
considered residuaries, meaning they inherit the remaining estate after fixed
shares have been distributed.
o Father and Mother: Each inherits 1/6 if there are children. If there are no
children, the father may receive 1/3, and the mother receives 1/3 if there are no
siblings.
o Grandparents: They may inherit in specific circumstances, such as when
there are no direct descendants.
 Residuary Heirs: After distributing fixed shares to specific heirs (spouse, parents,
etc.), the remaining estate goes to residuary heirs (usually the sons, as they inherit
twice the share of daughters). The distribution follows the concept of ‘Asaba’, where
male heirs of the deceased, typically sons and brothers, take the residue of the estate.

Page 15 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

Shia Law of Inheritance

Shia Muslims, who make up a minority (around 10-15%), follow the Jafari school of law,
which differs in certain aspects from Sunni law. While the fundamental principles remain
similar (i.e., inheritance is based on the Quran, Hadith, and jurisprudence), Shia law has
distinctions regarding how shares are distributed.

 Fixed Shares: Like Sunni law, Shia inheritance law provides fixed shares for certain
heirs, such as the spouse and children. However, in Shia law, the share of the wife is
1/8 if there are children, and 1/4 if there are no children, similar to Sunni law.

The key differences include:

o Sons and Daughters: Shia law does not follow the 2:1 ratio of inheritance
between sons and daughters. Instead, it gives equal shares to both sons and
daughters, i.e., each child, whether male or female, inherits equally.
o Parents: The share of the parents can be different under Shia law, particularly
with regard to the mother’s inheritance. For example, the mother may inherit
1/3 of the estate if there are no children and the father inherits 1/3 or more,
unlike Sunni law.
o Exclusion of Residuary Heirs: Under Shia law, residuary heirs do not
inherit in the same way as under Sunni law. The Shia doctrine limits the
inheritance of collateral relatives, and nephews, nieces, and siblings may not
inherit if direct heirs (children, parents) are alive.

2. Differences Between Sunni and Shia Law of Inheritance

The primary differences between Sunni and Shia inheritance law are as follows:

Aspect Sunni Law Shia Law

Shares of Sons inherit twice the share of

Sons and daughters inherit equally.
Children daughters (2:1)

Sons are the primary residuary No concept of residuary heirs like in

Residuary Heirs
heirs. Sunni law.

1/3 if there are no children, otherwise

Mother’s Share 1/6 if there are children.
1/6.

Inheritance of Wife gets 1/8 if there are Wife gets 1/8 if there are children, 1/4 if
Wife children, 1/4 if no children. no children.

1/3 if there are no children, and 1/6 if

Father’s Share 1/6 if there are children.
there are children.

Inheritance of Collateral relatives (siblings, Collateral relatives (siblings, cousins,

Collateral cousins, etc.) inherit if there etc.) inherit only if there are no direct
Relatives are no direct heirs. heirs and the estate is residual.

Page 16 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

Aspect Sunni Law Shia Law

Adopted children do not Shia law is similar but may provide

Rights of Adopted
inherit from the adopting certain rights for adopted children in
Children
parents. specific cases.

3. Administration of Estates under Muslim Law

The administration of estates under Muslim law involves the process of distributing the
deceased's property according to Islamic inheritance principles. The primary aspects include:

 Executor of the Will (Wasiyyah): If a Muslim has made a will (Wasiyyah) before
death, the executor (appointed by the deceased) is responsible for ensuring that the
estate is administered in accordance with the terms of the will and Islamic law. Under
Muslim law, a will can only be made for one-third of the estate, with the remaining
two-thirds being subject to legal distribution according to the fixed shares. A will
made for the remaining two-thirds is considered void.

Legal Reference:
The Quran (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:180) permits a Muslim to make a will, provided it
does not exceed one-third of the estate.

 Distribution of Estate: The property of the deceased is distributed by the legal heirs
according to the principles of inheritance. The estate includes all assets, including
property, savings, and debts. The executor of the estate is responsible for:
o Paying off debts: Any debts owed by the deceased must be paid before the
distribution of the estate.
o Distributing the estate: After debts are paid, the estate is distributed
according to Islamic inheritance laws, which may be Sunni or Shia depending
on the deceased’s sect.
 Guardianship of Minors: If there are minor heirs (such as children), a guardian is
appointed to protect their interests. This may be a family member or an appointed
third party. The guardian is tasked with managing the property until the minor heirs
come of age.

4. Wills under Muslim Law

A will (Wasiyyah) is a legal declaration made by a Muslim testator regarding the distribution
of their estate after death. Under Muslim law:

 Scope of the Will: A Muslim can make a will to dispose of only one-third of the
estate. The remaining two-thirds are to be distributed according to the fixed shares
defined in Islamic law.
 Restrictions on Beneficiaries: A Muslim cannot make a will in favor of legal heirs,
as their share is already fixed under the principles of inheritance. However, the
testator may leave the one-third to non-heirs or charitable causes.
 Revocation and Modification: A will can be revoked or modified by the testator
during their lifetime, provided they are of sound mind and not coerced.

Page 17 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

 Legal Formalities: To be legally valid, a will must be executed in the presence of two
witnesses who are of sound mind and not heirs of the deceased.

Conclusion

The Muslim law of inheritance and succession is deeply rooted in Islamic principles, and
the rules governing the inheritance differ slightly between Sunni and Shia Muslims. While
the distribution of property is similar in some respects, significant differences exist,
particularly in the way sons and daughters inherit, the share of the parents, and the concept of
residuary heirs. The administration of estates ensures that the deceased’s debts are settled,
and the remaining property is distributed among the heirs as per Islamic law. Additionally,
the practice of making a will (Wasiyyah) is allowed but is subject to restrictions to prevent
unfair distribution against the established shares of legal heirs

Unit 7
Indian Succession Act, 1925: Key Concepts and Legal Provisions

The Indian Succession Act, 1925 (ISA) governs succession and inheritance matters in India.
It deals with the succession of both movable and immovable property, either through a will or
intestate succession. This comprehensive piece of legislation provides detailed provisions
concerning domicile, intestate succession, wills and codicils, revocation of wills, bequests,
probate and letters of administration, executor and administrators, and the succession
certificate.

Below, I will provide an in-depth explanation of each of these key concepts, as outlined
under the Indian Succession Act, 1925, with legal language and references.

1. Domicile (Section 5 of the ISA)

The concept of domicile is central to understanding the jurisdiction and the application of
succession laws, especially with regard to personal law (Hindu, Muslim, Christian, etc.) and
the law governing succession to property.

 Domicile of origin: Every person is born with a domicile of origin, which is usually
the domicile of their father at the time of their birth. If the father is deceased, the
domicile of origin could be that of the mother.
 Domicile of choice: A person can acquire a domicile of choice by taking up residence
in a different country with the intention of making it their permanent home.
 Domicile under the Indian Succession Act: The Act provides that a person’s
domicile affects the jurisdiction of courts concerning matters of intestate succession
and the validity of wills. For example, if a person dies domiciled in India, Indian laws
on succession apply, and the probate or letters of administration must be granted
under Indian laws.

Page 18 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

Legal Reference:
Section 5 of the Indian Succession Act deals with the domicile of a person in relation to
succession laws. It mentions the rules determining the domicile for determining jurisdiction.

2. Intestate Succession (Sections 29-33, ISA)

Intestate succession refers to the distribution of a deceased person’s estate when there is no
valid will (testament). In such cases, the estate is distributed according to the provisions of
the Indian Succession Act, and it varies based on the deceased's religion.

 General Rules for Intestate Succession: Under Section 30 of the Act, when a person
dies intestate, the estate is divided among the legal heirs, based on the hierarchy of
relationships (e.g., spouse, children, parents, siblings).
 Order of Succession:
o Class I heirs: Includes children, spouse, and mother.
o Class II heirs: Includes father, siblings, and other distant relatives.
o If there are no Class I or Class II heirs, the property goes to the agnates
(paternal relatives) and cognates (maternal relatives).

The division of property follows specific share-based rules where a spouse may receive 1/3
or 1/4, children may receive equal shares, and parents may inherit if the deceased had no
children.

Legal Reference:
Section 29-33 provide the guidelines for intestate succession under the Indian Succession
Act.

3. Will and Codicil (Sections 2(h), 59, and 73 of the ISA)

A will is a legal declaration by a person about how their estate is to be distributed after their
death. A codicil is an amendment or addition to an existing will.

 Will (Section 2(h)): A will is a testamentary disposition that comes into effect only
upon the testator’s death. It may dispose of the whole or part of a person’s property
and can include directions about guardianship of children or payment of debts.
 Codicil (Section 73): A codicil is used to modify, add, or revoke provisions of an
existing will without revoking the entire document.
 Execution of Will: A will must be executed by the testator while being of sound mind
and legal capacity. The will should be signed by the testator in the presence of two
witnesses who also sign the document.

Legal Reference:
Section 59 of the Indian Succession Act discusses the validity of a will, emphasizing that it
must be executed voluntarily, with proper legal capacity.

Page 19 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

4. Revocation of Will (Section 62, ISA)

A will can be revoked or canceled at any time by the testator before their death. The
revocation can be explicit or implied:

 Explicit Revocation: The testator can directly cancel the will by making a new will
or by physically destroying the old will.
 Implied Revocation: If a testator makes a new will that does not mention the old will
or contradicts its provisions, the old will is deemed to be revoked.

Legal Reference:
Section 62 of the Indian Succession Act provides that a will is revoked by a subsequent will
or by the physical destruction of the will with the intention of revocation.

5. Bequests – Conditional, Contingent, or Void Bequests (Sections 113-114 of the ISA)

 Conditional Bequest: A conditional bequest is one that is subject to a specific

condition. The gift will be transferred only if the condition is met. For example, "I
bequeath my property to my son if he completes his education."
 Contingent Bequest: A contingent bequest depends on a future event or condition
that may or may not happen. If the contingency is not fulfilled, the bequest will fail.
 Void Bequest: A bequest is void if it is illegal or if the condition violates the law or
public policy. For example, a bequest that contravenes the Indian Penal Code or
promotes illegal activity is considered void.

Legal Reference:
Section 113-114 of the Indian Succession Act provides rules regarding conditional and
contingent bequests and outlines when bequests are void or fail.

6. Legacies (Section 105-109 of the ISA)

A legacy is a gift of personal property made in a will. The Indian Succession Act recognizes
different forms of legacies, including:

 Specific Legacy: A bequest of a specific item, such as "I bequeath my gold watch to
my son."
 General Legacy: A bequest of a specific sum of money or equivalent property,
without any specific identification of the item.
 Residuary Legacy: A bequest that includes whatever remains of the estate after all
debts, funeral expenses, and other legacies have been paid.

Legal Reference:
Section 105-109 outlines the rules for legacies and the process of bequeathing specific or
general property.

Page 20 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

7. Probate and Letters of Administration (Sections 222-223, 270-272 of the ISA)

 Probate: A probate is the official recognition by a court of the validity of a will. It is

a certificate issued by a court that confirms the authenticity of the will and grants the
executor authority to distribute the estate according to the testator’s instructions.
 Letters of Administration: In the absence of a will, letters of administration are
issued to a person (administrator) who is authorized to handle the estate of a deceased
person. It grants the administrator legal authority to manage and distribute the
deceased's estate.

Legal Reference:
Section 222-223 and Section 270-272 of the Indian Succession Act outline the process of
obtaining probate and letters of administration, as well as the respective roles of executors
and administrators.

8. Executor and Administrators (Section 2, 219-223, ISA)

An executor is the person appointed in the will by the testator to administer the estate after
their death. If no executor is appointed, an administrator is appointed by the court. The
primary functions of an executor/administrator include:

 Collecting and managing the estate.

 Paying debts and liabilities.
 Distributing the estate among the legal heirs or as directed in the will.

Legal Reference:
Section 2 defines an executor, while Sections 219-223 discuss their duties and
responsibilities.

9. Succession Certificate (Sections 370-379, ISA)

A succession certificate is a legal document issued by a court to enable an heir or legal

representative to collect the deceased person’s debts and securities (e.g., bank accounts,
shares). It is primarily used in the case of intestate succession.

 Eligibility: The person applying for the succession certificate must establish their
relationship with the deceased and prove their right to succeed.
 Jurisdiction: A succession certificate is issued by the district court in the jurisdiction
where the deceased lived or had property.

Legal Reference:
Section 370-379 of the Indian Succession Act provides the framework for obtaining a
succession certificate.

Page 21 of 22
 L.L.B Sem II ( Family Law )

Conclusion

The Indian Succession Act, 1925 is a crucial piece of legislation that governs the
distribution of property in cases of intestate succession and wills. It covers a wide range of
issues including domicile, intestate succession, wills, codicils, revocation of wills, bequests,
legacies, probate, letters of administration, and succession certificates. Understanding these
provisions is essential for navigating the complexities of inheritance and ensuring that a
deceased person’s estate is distributed in accordance with their wishes or applicable laws

Page 22 of 22