i

MUSLIM CULTURAL VALUES AND EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AMONG

JUNIOR AND SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL LEARNERS

____________________

A Research
Presented to
The Faculty of the Senior High School
Baganga National High School
Davao Oriental

____________________

In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Strand
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
Academic Track

____________________
MAE RENDOLA
JAY GABRIEL SANGCOPAN
JOHN LLOYD JAPITAN
MARK ANTHONY ELICOT
JULIA MONICA BATAO
JASMINE LUIB

April 2025
 ii

BAGANGA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Quezon St., Poblacion, Baganga, Davao Oriental
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

APPROVAL SHEET

This research titled, “MUSLIM CULTURAL VALUES AND EMOTIONAL

INTELLIGENCE AMONG JUNIOR AND SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL MUSLIM
LEARNERS”, of the Baganga National High School prepared and submitted by
MAE RENDOLA, et al. in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the strand of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, has been examined and is
recommended for approval and acceptance.

JACQUEZ ALEX L. DAHUNAN, MAEd-TE

Adviser

APPROVED by the dissertation committee on oral examination with a grade of

PASSED.

JASON MUYALDE, PhD

Chairperson

PATRICIA B. BASIGSIG, PhD LLORELYN B. DAMUY, MAEd

Member Member

ACCEPTED and APPROVED in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the

strand of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

Oral Examination–PASSED

SARA JANE D. RABUYA, EdD

Principal III

April 2025
 iii

Acknowledgment

The author wishes to express his heartfelt gratitude to everyone who has

contributed their love and support to the completion of this study. The researcher

was able to complete his research thanks to the devotion, enthusiasm, support,

encouragement, and inspiration of several people to whom he wishes to express

his gratitude.

To….

MR
JGS
JLJ
MAE
JMB
JL
 iv

Dedication

The researcher would like to dedicate this study to the following persons:

MR
JGS
JLJ
MAE
JMB
JL
 v

Abstract

Leave this for now…

Keywords:
 vi

Table of Contents Page

 vii

Title Page i

Approval Sheet ii

Acknowledgment iii

Dedication vi

Abstract vii

Table of Contents viii

List of Tables xi

List of Figures xii

Chapter

1 Introduction

The Problem and Its Setting 1

Significance of the Study 8

Statement of the Problem 13

Hypothesis 14

Theoretical Framework 17

Conceptual Framework 17

2 Methodology

Research Design 35

Locale of the Study 37

Sample and Sampling Technique 39

Research Instruments 42

Data Gathering Procedure 45

Data Analysis 48
 viii

Ethical Considerations 49

3 Results

63

4 Discussion 97

5 Conclusion and Recommendations

Conclusions 137

Recommendations 139

References 142

Appendices 159

A Permission Letters 160

Curriculum Vitae

List of Tables

Page

Table Title
 ix

1.1 64

1.2 70

1.3 72

List of Figures
Figure Page
Title
1 Theoretical Framework of the Study 15

2 Mixed Methods Research Proposal Framework 16

 x

3 Diagram on Explanatory Sequential Design 37

4 Maps of the Philippines and Region XI 38

5 Flow of Procedures 52
 11

Chapter 1

INTRODUCTION

The Problem and Its Setting

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 12

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Significance of the Study

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 13

Statement of the Problem

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxx

1. To determine the level of (IV) in terms of (indicators); the level of (DV) in

terms of (indicators).

2. To determine the significance…

Hypothesis

The hypothesis will be tested at 0.05 level of significance.

Ho: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

H1: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 14

Theoretical Framework

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Conceptual Framework

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxx
 15

IV DV

Figure 1. Conceptual Framework of the Study

 16

Chapter 2

METHODOLOGY

Research Design

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxx

Locale of the Study

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxx
 17

Figure 2. Maps of the Philippines and Davao Oriental

Sample and Sampling Technique

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxddddd
 18

Research Instruments

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. The Likert Scale will be used to analyze the result:

(IV)

Level Range of Means Description Interpretation

st
5 4.20 – 5.00 Very High 21 century skills of school heads
are always demonstrated.
4 3.40 – 4.19 High 21st century skills of school heads
are oftentimes demonstrated
3 2.60 – 3.39 Moderate 21st century skills of school heads
are sometimes demonstrated
2 1.80 – 2.59 Low 21st century skills of school heads
are rarely demonstrated
1 1.00 – 1.79 Very Low 21st century skills of school heads
are never demonstrated

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. The Likert Scale will be used to analyze the result:

(DV)

Level Range of Means Description Interpretation

5 4.20 – 5.00 Very High Technological capability of school
heads are always manifested
4 3.40 – 4.19 High Technological capability of school
heads oftentimes manifested
3 2.60 – 3.39 Moderate Technological capability of school
heads sometimes manifested
2 1.80 – 2.59 Low Technological capability of school
heads rarely manifested
1 1.00 – 1.79 Very Low Technological capability of school
heads are never manifested

Data Gathering Procedure

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 19

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxx

Data Analysis

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Ethical Considerations

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 20

References

Aas, M., & Paulsen, J. M. (2019). National strategy for supporting school principal’s

instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration.

Abao, E., Dayagbil, F. & Boholano, H. (2015). Engagement to Social Networking:

Challenges and Opportunities to Educators. European Scientific

Journal.Vol.11, No.16, 173‐191

Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: an empirical

investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly,

41, 49-82. doi:10.1177/0013161X04269517

Avolio B. J., Kahai S., Dodge G. E. (2000). E-leadership: implications for theory,

research, and practice. Leader. Q. 11, 615–668. 10.1016/S1048-

9843(00)00062-X

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman &

Company.

Bailey, A., Henry, T., McBride, L., & Puckett, J. (2011, August). Unleashing the

potential of technology in education [Report]. Retrieved from The Boston

Consulting Group: http://www.bcg.com/documents/file82603.pdf

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future.

The Clearing House, 83, 39-43.

Boholano, H. B. (2017). Smart social networking: 21st century teaching and

learning skills. Research in Pedagogy, 7(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.

17810/2015.45

Brun, J. P. (2010). Missing pieces: 7 ways to improve employee well-being and

 21

organizational effectiveness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bullough, R. V. (2005). Teacher Vulnerability and Teachability: A Case Study of a

Mentor and Two Interns. Teacher Education Quarterly. pp. 24-39.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ795314.pdf.

Cahapay, M. B. (2022). The Phenomenon of Leading without Guidebook:

Educational Leadership Practices of Philippine School Principals in Virulent

COVID-19 Times. International Journal of Educational Leadership and

Management. 10 (1), doi: 10.17583/ijelm.2022.7666

Çebi, A., & Reisoğlu, I. (2019). A training activity for improving the digital

competences of pre-service teachers: The views of pre-service teacher in

CEIT and other disciplines. Educational Technology Theory and

Practice, 9(2), 539–565. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.562663.

Charles, T., Chris, K. K. & Kosgei, Z. (2012). The influence of supervision of

teachers’ lesson notes by head teachers on students’ academic

performance in secondary schools in Bureti District, Kenya. Journal of

Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(3), 299-

306.

Chang, I. H., The effect of principals’ technological leadership on teachers’

technological literacy and teaching effectiveness in Taiwanese elementary

schools. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (2) (2012), pp. 328-340

Chen, J., & Guo, W. (2020). Emotional intelligence can make a difference: The

impact of principals’ emotional intelligence on teaching strategy mediated by

instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration &

 22

Leadership, 48(1), 82-105.

Cheng, Y. C. (2002, November). Fostering local knowledge and wisdom in

globalized education: Multiple theories. Presented at the 8th International

Conference on Globalization and Localization Enmeshed: Searching for a

Balance in Education, Bangkok, Thailand

Cillessen, A. H., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement:

Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social

status. Child development, 75(1), 147-163.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among

Five Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed

Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Crouch, M., & Mckenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based

qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483-499.

Crow, G.M., Hausman, C. S. & Scribner, J. P. (2002). Reshaping the role of the

school principal. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of

Education, 101(1), 189–210.

Davidson, D. (2014). Preparing principals and developing school leadership

associations for the 21st century. Retrieved from: www.international

schoolsleadership.com.

Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. 21st century skills:

Rethinking how students learn, 20, 51‐76.

 23

Department of Education Training and Employment (2014). Global Schools.

Creating successful global citizens. Available at

qld.gov.au/curriculum/pdfs/global-schools-consultation-draft.pdf.

DepEd National Competency-Based Standards for School Heads (2015).

https://www.slideshare.net/DepEdNEAP/deped-national-competency

based-standards-for-school-heads-50954270

Department of Education. (2012). K TO 12 Toolkit. Reference guide for teacher

educators, school administrators, and teachers. Retrieved from

http://www.seameo-innotech.org.

Dweck, Carol. (2009). "Who will the 21st-century learners be?" Knowledge Quest,

vol. 38, no. 2, 2009, p. 8+. Accessed 31 Dec. 2020.

Elmore, R. F. (2007). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and

performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press

Enochsson, A.-B., & Rizza, C. (2009). ICT in Initial Teacher Training: Research

Review. (38). OECD Education Working Paper: OECD Publishing

European Commission. (2010). A Digital Agenda for Europe. Brussels, 26.8.2010.

Available at: http://ec. europa.eu/information_society/digital-agenda/

index_en.html

Fernandez, R. M. (2013). Teachers’ competence and learners’ performance in the

alternative learning system towards and enriched instructional program.

International Journal of Information Technology and Business

Management, 22, 33-46.

Friesen, S., Saar, C., Park, A., Marcotte, C., Hampshire, T., Martin, B., Brown, B.,
 24

& Martin, J. (2015). What is Instructional Leadership? Galileo.org.

https://inquiry.galileo.org/ch6/instructional-leadership/what-is-

instructional-leadership/.

Gallardo, G. (2010). Community participation and it’s relation to school

performance among peak performing schools in region 2. University of Saint

Louis, Tuguegarao, Philippines, 3500.

Gamage, D. (2006). Professional development for leaders and managers of self-

governing schools. Spinger. The Netherlands.

Garcia-Perez, R., Rebollo-Catalan, A., & Garcia-Perez, C. (2016). The relationship

between teacher training preferences and their digital skills on social

networks. BORDON-REVISTA DE PEDAGOGIA, 68(2), 137-153.

Gareis, C. R., & Grant, L. W. (2015). Teacher-made assessments: How to connect

curriculum, instruction, and student learning. Routledge.

Gewertz, C. (2003). N.Y.C. Chancellor Aims to Bolster Instructional Leadership.

Education Week, 22(16, Jan. 8), 7), 12.

Gewertz, C. (2008, October 13). States press ahead on 21st century skills.

Education Week, 28(8), 21-23

Gibbons, L. K., Wilhelm, A. G., & Cobb, P. (2019). Coordinating leadership

supports for teachers’ instructional improvement. Journal of School

Leadership, 29(3), 248-268.

Griffin, P., McGraw, B., & Care, E. (Eds.) (2012). Assessment and Teaching of

21st Century Skills. Dordrech: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-

007-2324-5
 25

Gruenert, S. (2005). Correlations of collaborative school cultures with student

achievement. NASSP Bulletin.

Goddard, Y., Miller, R., Larson, R., Goddard, R. (2013, May). Connecting Principal

Leadership, Teacher Collaboration, and Student Achievement.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED528704.pdf

Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher

effectiveness: A research synthesis. Washington DC: National

Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.

Gray, J. (2018) "Instructional Leadership Of Principals And Its Relationship With

The Academic Achievement Of High-Poverty Students". Murray State

Theses and Dissertations. 122.

https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/etd/122

Greaves, T. W., Hayes, J., Wilson, L., Gielniak, M., & Peterson, E. L. (2012).

Revolutionizing education through technology: The project RED roadmap

for transformation [e-Book]. Eugene, OR: International Society for

Technology in Education.

Gumus, S., Bulut, O., &Bellibas, M. S. (2013). The relationship between principal

leadership and teacher collaboration in Turkish primary schools: A

multilevel analysis. Education Research and Perspectives, 40, 1 – 29.

Haddud A., McAllen D. (2018). Digital workplace management: exploring aspects

related to culture, innovation, and leadership, in Proceedings of the

Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and

Technology, PICMET 2018 (Honolulu: HI; ), 1–6.

 26

Haig, T. (2014). Equipping schools to fight poverty: A community hub approach.

Educational Philosophy & Theory, 46(9), 1018-1035.

Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of

instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of

Education, 33, 329– 352.

Hallinger, P., Wang, W. C., & Chen, C. W. (2013). Assessing the measurement

properties of the principal instructional management rating scale: A meta-

analysis of reliability studies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2),

272-309.

Hamzah, H.N., Nasir, M.K., Wahab, J.A. (2021) The effects of principals’ digital

leadership on teachers’ digital teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic in

Malaysia. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8 (2), pp. 216-

221 http://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.82.216.221

Hand, P., & Prain, V. (2003). Using new technologies for learning: A case study of

a whole-school approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,

35(4), 441458.

Harvard Business Review Analytic Services (2017). Operationalizing Digital

Transformation: New Insights Into Making Digital Work. 1–12. Available

online at: https://hbr.org/sponsored/2017/05/operationalizing-digital-

transformation-new-insights-into-making-digital-transformation-work

Harward, D., Taylor, K. (2014). What makes a great training organization? (1st

ed.). Pearson Education. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/131227

Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education:

 27

Foundations for the twenty‐first century. Science education, 88(1), 28‐54.

Howell, J. (2012). Teaching with ICT: Digital pedagogies for collaboration and

creativity. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Huber, S. (2003). School leader development: Current trends from a global

perspective. In P., Hallinger (Ed.), Reshaping the landscape of school

leadership development: A global perspective. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets &

Zeitlinger.

Hutton, D. M. (2018). Critical factors explaining the leadership performance of

high-performing principals. International Journal of Leadership in

Education, 21(2), 245-265.

Ilomäki, L., Kantosalo, A., & Lakkala, M. (2011). What is digital competence?

Linked portal. Brussels: European Schoolnet (EUN), 1-12. Retrieved from

https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/154423/Ilom_ki_etal_2011

_What_is_digital_competence.pdf?sequence =1.

Jimes, C., Wiess, S., & Keep, R. (2013). Addressing the local in localization: A

case study of open textbook adoption by three South African teachers.

Journal of Asynchoronous Learning Networks, 17, 73-86.

Kallestad, J.H. (2010). Changes in school climate in a long-term perspective.

Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(1), 1-14.

Kezar, A. J., Gallant, T. B., & Lester, J. (2012). Everyday people making a

difference on college campuses: The tempered grassroots leadership

tactics of faculty and staff. Studies in Higher Education, 36(2), 129–151.

Khateeb, A. (2017). Measuring Digital Competence and ICT Literacy: An

 28

Exploratory Study of In-Service English Language Teachers in the Context

of Saudi Arabia. International Education Studies; 10(12),

https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n12p38

King, J. (2017). Giving every student a fair shot. The Education Digest, 82(7),
16–25.
Kivunja, C. (2013). Embedding digital pedagogy in pre-service higher education to

better prepare teachers for the digital generation. International Journal of

Higher Education, 2(4), 131–142.

Kozloski, K. C. (2006). Principal leadership for technology integration: A study of

principal technology leadership. Drexel University. Unpublished doctoral

dissertation.

Krumsvik, R. J. (2008). Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence.

Education and Information Technologies, 13(13), 279–290.

Ladd, G. W., & Burgess, K. B. (2001). Do relational risks and protective factors

moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early

psychological and school adjustment? Child development, 72(5), 1579-

1601.

Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). Effects of mobile learning time on students'

conception of collaboration, communication, complex problem–solving,

meta–cognitive awareness and creativity. International Journal of Mobile

Learning and Organisation, 8(3-4), 276-291.

Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: A literature review. Pearson Publisher. Retrieved

November, 11, 2016.

Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity,

 29

agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school

reform. Teaching and Teacher Education. Vol. 21. pp. 899-916.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003.

Le Fevre, D., & Robinson, V.M.J. (2014). The interpersonal challenges of

instructional leadership: Principals’ effectiveness in conversations about

performance issues. doi 10.1177/0013161X13518218 Educational

Administration Quarterly.

Leithwood, K., Seashore-Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2005). How

leadership influences student learning: Review of research. New York, NY:

The Wallace Foundation

Lilian, C.: Virtual teams: opportunities and challenges for e-leaders. Procedia Soc.

Behav.Sci. 110, 1251–1261 (2014)

Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2009). How does leadership affect

student achievement? Results from a national survey. Paper presented at

the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,

San Diego.

Lutgen-Sandvik, P. (2010). Destructive organizational communication:

Processes, consequences, and constructive ways of organizing. New

York: Routledge.

Machado, A. M., & Brandão, C. (2019). Leadership and Technology: Concepts

and Questions. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 764–773.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16184-2_73

Maderick, J. A., Zhang, S., Hartley, K., & Marchand, G. (2016). Preservice
 30

Teachers and Self-Assessing Digital Competence. Journal of Educational

Computing Research, 54(3), 326–1. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0735633115

620432.

Marks, H. & Printy, S. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An

integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational

Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397

Marzano, R.J., Waters, T. & McNulty, B.A. (2005). School leadership that works:

From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision &

Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Mendoza, L., Gempes, G., Eunice A. Atienzar, E. (2016). The Pedagogical

Journey of School Heads: Icexcels Learning Course in Context.

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 7 (6).

https://www.ijser.org

MetLife, Inc. (2013). The MetLife survey of the American teacher: Challenges for

school leadership. A survey of teachers and principals. Report. New York:

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. https://www.metlife.com/assets/

cao/foundation/MetLife-Teacher-Survey2012.pdf

Mahmoodi, F., & Mola, S. (2016). Assessing the attainment of 21st century basic

skills by engineering students of Tabriz university. Iranian Journal of

Engineering Education, 18(69), 19-38.

Moralista, R. B., & Delarierte, G. C. (2014). Alternative learning system (ALS

education): Its influence on the intellectual abilities of the indigenous

people. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts, and Sciences, 1, 7-10.

 31

Moyer, L. (2016). Engaging students in 21st century skills through non-formal

education (Doctoral Dissertation). Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic

Institute and State University.

Mumford, M. D., Friedrich, T. L., Caughron, J. J., & Byrne, C. L. (2007). Leader

cognition in real-world settings: How do leaders think about crises?

Leadership Quarterly, 18, 515-543

Murphy, J. (2002). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New

blueprints. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 176–192

Napal-Fraile, M., Peñalva-Vélez, A., & Mendióroz-Lacambra, A. (2018).

Development of Digital Competence in Secondary Education Teachers’

Training. Education Sciences, 8(3), 104–104. https://doi.org/10.3390/

educsci8030104.

Nikula, P. (2017). The digital classroom revolution. Available at https://briefing

papers.co.nz/the-digital-classroom-revolution/

O'Brennan, L.M., Waasdorp, T.E. & Bradshaw, C.P. (2014). Strengthening

bullying prevention through school staff connectedness. Journal of

Educational Psychology, 106(3), 870-880

OECD (2005) Definition and Selection of Key Competencies. Executive

Summary (online resource) OECD Publishing.

Pa-alisbo, M. A. (2017). The 21st Century Skills and Job Performance of

Teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(32), 7–12.

Papathanasiou, I. V., Tsaras, K., & Sarafis, P. (2014). Views and perceptions of

nursing students on their clinical learning environment: Teaching and

 32

learning. Nurse education today, 34(1), 57-60.

Pearlman, B. (2010). Designing New Learning Environment to Support 21st

Century skills. 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn.

Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press, 117-147. Pheeraphan, N & Sompong,

N. (2011). A Synthesis of Research on Online Learning in Thailand's Higher

Education. Thaksin Curriculum and Instruction Journal, 6(2), 87-95.

Peretomode, V. F. (2001). Introduction to Educational Administration, Planning

and Supervision. Ikeja: Joja Research and Publishers Ltd.

Phongphinyo, P. (2020). The 21st Century Skills of School Administrators under

Udon Thani Primary Education Service Area Office. The International

Academic Forum.

Pinca, E. (2015). The mobile teachers’ profile, competencies, performance and

problems in the department of education, division of Northern Samar,

Philippines. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research,

4(12), 45-50.

Popper, M. (2004). Leadership as relationship. Journal for the Theory of Social

Behaviour, 34, 107-125. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8308.2004.00238.x.

Quist, H. O. (2003). Transferred and adapted models of secondary education in

Ghana: What implications for national development?. International Review

of Education, 49(5), 411-431.

Rajbhandari, M. M. S. (2012). Growing with driving leadership style in school: A

case study on leadership of Finnish elementary schools in Tampere.

University of Tampere. School of Education. Tampere, Finland.

 33

ED532213. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED532213.pdf

Rantala, L., & Suoranta, J. (2008). Digital literacy policies in the EU–inclusive

partnership as the final stage of governmentality. Digital literacies:

Concepts, policies and practices, 91-117. Retrieved from https://www.

researchgate.net/profile/Juha_Suoranta/publication/274316556_Digital_

Literacy_Policies_in_the_EU-inclusive_Partnership_as_the_Final_

Stage_of_Governmentality/links/551bb0f10cf251c35b50a199/

Digital-Literacy-Policies-in-the-EU-Inclusive-Partnership-as-the-Final-

Stage-of-Governmentality.pdf

Ravitz, J., Hixson, N., English, M., & Mergendoller, J. (2012, April). Using project

based learning to teach 21st century skills: Findings from a statewide

initiative Paper presented at Annual Meetings of the American Educational

Research Association, Vancouver, BC.

Rezak, C. (April, 2020). Developing your Critical thinking skills. Retrieved from:

https://www.marchfifteen.ca/leadership-the-importance-of-critical-

thinking/#:~:text=A%20leader%20with%20critical%20thinking,

reasoning%2C%20and%20make%20proper%20decisions

Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. (2017). How to Construct a Mixed Methods

Research Design. Kolner Zeithschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie,

107-131.

Schrum, L., Galizio, L. M., & Ledesma, P. (2011, March). Educational leadership and

technology integration: An investigation into preparation, experiences, and

roles. Journal of School Leadership, 21(2), 241-261

 34

Schrum, L., & Levin, B. B. (2009). Leading 21st-century schools: Harnessing

technology for engagement and achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA:

Corwin Press

Sindhvad, S. P. (2009). School principals as instructional leaders: An

investigation of school leadership capacity in the Philippines (Doctoral

dissertation, University of Minnesota).

Starr, K. (2015). Small rural school leadership: Creating opportunity through

collaboration. In School leadership in diverse contexts (pp. 49-62). Surrey,

England: Routledge.

Stephens, T. (2007). Climate Change and Elasticity in Leadership. Lowy Institute

for International Policy. International Leadership.

Stiggins, R., & Duke, D. (2008). Effective Instructional Leadership Requires

Assessment Leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(4), 285–291. https://doi.

org/10.1177/003172170809000410

Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in schools: Reflections and

empirical evidence. School Leadership & Management, 22(1), 73–92.

Stewart, D.W., P.N. Shamdasani, and D.W. Rook (2007) Focus Groups: Theory

and Practice, 2nd edition, vol. 20, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Sule, M. A., Arop, F. O. & Alade, F. O. (2012). Principal’s classroom visitation

and inspection, and teachers’ job performance in Akwa-Ibom State,

Nigeria. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(11), 106-

111.

Summers, D. C. (2010). Quality management: Creating and sustaining

 35

organizational effectiveness. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic

management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Templeton, N. R., Hammett, R., Low, G., Arrambide, M., & Willis, K. (2016). A

principal leadership framework for enhancing teacher practice through

coaching with emotional intelligence. The International Journal of

Transformative Emotional Intelligence, 4, 93103.

Teo, P. (2015). 4 Educating for the 21st century. Secondary school English

education in Asia: From policy to practice.

Timperley, H. S. (2005). Instructional Leadership Challenges: The Case of Using

Student Achievement Information for Instructional Improvement.

Leadership and Policy in Schools. Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 3-22.

doi.org/10.1080/15700760590924591.

Tindowen, D. J., Bangi, J., & Parallag Jr, C. (2019). Pre-Service Teachers’

Evaluation on their Student Internship Program. International Journal of

Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(10), 279-291.

Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). The e-capacity of primary schools:

Development of a conceptual model and scale construction from a school

improvement perspective. Computers & Education, 55, 541–553.

Wagner, T. (2013). Tony Wagner’s seven survival skills. As defined by business

leaders in their own words. Retrieved from: www.tonywagner.com/7‐

survival‐skills.
 36

Wallace Foundation, (2013). The school principal as leader: Guiding schools to

better teaching and learning. Report. Retrieved from http://www.wallace

foundation.org/knowledge-center/schoolleadership/effectiveprincipal-

leadership/Documents/

Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., Quittre, V., Van de Gaer, E., & Monseur,

C. (2013). The use of ICT in education: A survey of schools in

Europe. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 11–27.

Weyer, J. (2002). Importance of leadership capacity versus competence: A case

study. Australian Journal of Management and Organizational Behaviour, 5

(1), 117—128

Wieczorek, D. & Manard, C. (2018). Instructional Leadership Challenges and

Practices of Novice Principals in Rural Schools. Journal of Research in

Rural Education. Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 1-21.

https://jrre.psu.edu/sites/default/files/2019-06/34-2_0.pdf.

Wisdom, J., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Mixed Methods: Integrating Quantitative and

Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis while Studying Patient-Centered

Medical Home Models. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Yate, M. (2009). Hiring the best: A manager’s guide to effective interviewing and

recruiting. Cincinnati, OH: F & W Media.

 37

Appendices
 38

Appendix A

Permission Letters
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
 47

APPENDIX C
Survey Questionnaires
 48

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES

The 21st Century Skills and Technological Capability

as Determinants of Instructional Leadership of Public School
Heads in Region XI: An Explanatory Sequential Design

Dear Participants,

The undersigned is conducting a research entitled, “The 21st Century Skills and
Technological Capability as Determinants of Instructional Leadership of Public School
Heads in Region XI: An Explanatory Sequential Design in Region XI”. In this connection, the
researcher is humbly requesting your time and effort to provide the necessary data in the
personal information section.
Hence, listed below are series of statements that represent possible feelings that you
may have about 21st century skills, technological capability and instructional leadership.
Please indicate the degree of your agreement to every statement. Rest assured that your
response to each question will be held with strictest confidentiality.

The following survey questionnaires will measure the extent of your agreement on the items
about you regarding your 21st century skills, technological capability, and instructional
leadership.
Direction: Please put a check (√) on the column that you think most suited to your answer
using the scale below:

5 = Strongly Agree 2 = Disagree

4 = Agree 1 = Strongly Disagree
3 = Moderately Agree
 49

Part 1. 21st CENTURY SKILLS

Adopted from the research instrument of Hixson et al. (2012)
Critical Thinking 5 - Likert Scale

5 4 3 2 1
My School Head…

compares information from different sources before

completing a task or assignment.
1.

draw conclusions based on analysis of numbers, facts, or

relevant information.
2.

summarizes or creates own interpretation of what has read or

been taught.
3.

Collaboration 5 - Likert Scale

5 4 3 2 1
My School Head…

1. works in pairs or small groups to complete a task together.

2. works with other teachers to set goals and creates a plan for
team.

3. creates joint products using contributions from teachers.

4. presents group work to the class, teacher or others.

5. works as a team to incorporate feedback on group tasks or

products.

6. gives feedback to peers or assess students or teachers work.

Creativity and Innovation 5 - Likert Scale

My School Head… 5 4 3 2 1

1. uses idea creation techniques such as brainstorming or

concept mapping.

2. generates own ideas about how to confront a problem or

question.
 50

3. tests out different ideas and work to improve them.

4. invents a solution to a complex, open-ended question or

problem.

5. creates an original product or performance to express my

ideas.

Self-direction 5 - Likert Scale

5 4 3 2 1
My School Head…

1. takes initiative when confronted with a difficult problem or

question.

2. chooses own topics of learning or questions to pursue.

3. plans the steps to accomplish a complex task.

4. chooses for what examples to study or resources to use.

5. monitors own progress towards completion of a complex task

and modify work accordingly.

6. uses specific criteria to assess the quality of work before it is

completed.

7. uses peer, teacher or expert feedback to revise work

Making Global Connection 5 - Likert Scale

5 4 3 2 1
My School Head…

1. studies information about other countries or cultures.

2. uses information or ideas that come from people in other

countries or cultures.

3. discusses issues related to global interdependency like global

environment trends, global market economy).

4. understands the life experiences of people in cultures.

5. studies the geography of distant countries.

 51

6. reflects on how personal experiences and local issues are

connected to global issues.

Making Local Connection 5 - Likert Scale

5 4 3 2 1
My School Head…

1. investigates topics or issues that are relevant to family or

community.

2. applies what the learning to local situations, issues or

problems.

3. talks to one or more members of the community about a class

project or activity.

4. analyzes how different stakeholder groups or community

members view an issue.

5. responds to a question or task in a way that weighs the

concerns of different community members or groups.

Using Technology as a Tool for Learning 5 - Likert Scale

5 4 3 2 1
My School Head...

1. uses technology or the Internet for self-instruction like Kahn

Academy or other videos, tutorials, self-instructional websites,
etc.

2. selects appropriate technology tools or resources for

completing a task.

3. evaluates the credibility and relevance of online resources.

4. uses technology to analyze information like databases,

spreadsheets, graphic programs, etc.).

uses technology to help others share information like multi-

media presentations using sound or video, presentation
5.
software, blogs, podcasts, etc.

6. uses technology to support teamwork or collaboration (e.g.,

shared workspaces, email exchanges, giving and receiving
 52

feedback, etc.).

7. uses technology to interact directly with experts or members

of local/global communities.

PART II. INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP

Adopted from National Competency- Based Standards for School Heads (NCBSSH) Enclosure
to DepEd Order No. 32, s. 2010
Direction: Please put a check (√) on the column that you think most suited to your
answer using the scale below:
5 = Strongly Agree 2 = Disagree
4 = Agree 1 = Strongly Disagree
3 = Moderately Agree

Assessment for Learning 5 - Likert Scale

5 4 3 2 1
My School Head…

1. manages the process and procedure in monitoring student

achievement

2. ensures utilization of a range of assessment processes to assess

student performance.

3. assesses the effectiveness of curricular/co-curricular programs

and or instructional strategies.

4. utilizes assessment results to improve learning.

5. creates and manage a school process to ensure student progress

is conveyed to student and parents/guardians regularly.

Developing Programs and Adapting Existing Programs 5 - Likert Scale

5 4 3 2 1
My School Head…

1. develops/adapts a research –based school program

 53

2. assists in implementing an existing, coherent and responsive

school-wide curriculum

3. addresses deficiencies and sustain successes of current programs

in collaboration with teachers and learners.

4. develops a culture of functionality literacy.

Implementing Program for Instructional Improvement 5 - Likert Scale

5 4 3 2 1
My School Head…

1. manages the introduction of curriculum initiatives in line with

DepEd policies (e.g. BEC. Madrasah)

2. works with teachers in curriculum review

3. enriches curricular offerings based on local needs

4. manages curriculum innovation and enrichment with the use of

technology.

5. organizes team to champion instructional innovation programs

towards curricular responsiveness.
 54

APPENDIX F

Informed Consent Form

BAGANGA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

 55

Quezon St., Poblacion, Baganga, Davao Oriental

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Ethics Informed Consent Form (ICF)

QUANTITATIVE PHASE

Informed Consent Form for 21st CENTURY SKILLS AND TECHNOLOGICAL

CAPABILITY
AS DETERMINANTS OF INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP
OF
PUBLIC SCHOOL HEADS IN REGION XI: AN
EXPLANATORY
SEQUENTIAL DESIGNS
Name of the Researcher(s) JASON MUYALDE
Institution: UNIVERSITY OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION

INTRODUCTION

You are invited to participate in a research study conducted by JASON MUYALDE, at

the University of the Immaculate Conception, because you fit the inclusion criteria for
informants of our study.

Your participation is completely voluntary. Please read the information below, and ask
questions about anything you do not understand, before deciding whether to
participate. Please take as much time as you need to read the consent form. You may
also decide to discuss participation with your family or friends.

If you decide to participate, you will be asked to sign this form. You will be given a
copy of this form.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This study aims to utilize mixed methods research approach in determining the
combined influence of 21st century skills and technological capability towards the
instructional leadership skills of school heads as perceived by the public secondary
school teachers in Region XI. To better understand the quantitative measures, a
sequential explanatory design will be used to gather and complement the research
findings. It is expected that results of this dissertation study would serve as a way to
have a better understanding of how the instructional leadership given the demand of
complex tasks, they are expected to possess the necessary 21st century skills and
digital competence which brought so many changes in the educational landscape. It
will also provide a substantial contribution to the scarcity of studies in literature that
explores on the variables as used in this study. It will be shared on research
conferences where the explored topic of this study will be considered suitable,
necessary and useful as well as in an online journal which can be more available to
other future researchers.

STUDY PROCEDURES
If you volunteer to participate in this study, you will be asked to participate by
answering the survey questionnaire which you can finish in less than 30 minutes. Due
to the steadiness of the COVID-19 pandemic, the researcher will make assure that all
the necessary procedures that will be used in the study should undergo health
 56

protocols. In order to avoid direct contact with each other, google forms will be
provided for the survey and link for zoom will be given during interview. If you have
any questions regarding to the instruction and the conduct of the study, you may ask
the directly the researcher. Don’t worry because you will be directed by the
researcher. You are suggested to please have with you your internet connection
during the conduct of the study. Other materials will be provided by the researcher
such as the link for survey and interview. Reminder to please be reminded of
observing health protocols as mandated in the IATF Guidelines. The data that you will
be providing will be accounted confidentially. The data will only be used for achieving
the goals of the study. Furthermore, your essential information will not be disclosed in
the study.

POTENTIAL RISKS AND DISCOMFORTS

The study aims to identify the 21st century skills, and technological capability as
determinants of instructional leadership of public-school heads. The nature of the
study is not considered too subtle, since challenges and/or obstructions in the
workplace are common. However, the researcher will be considerate upon your
situations. You may opt not to answer questions which make you feel any
psychological or emotional distress or you can withdraw as a participant of the study if
you feel that you cannot discuss the information that is asked of you. The researchers
value your participation and will place your welfare as their highest priority during the
course of the study. Due to the pandemic, it is highly advised that we strictly follow
the basic safety protocols to avoid the potential health risk that we may acquire.
Before answering the google form, it is recommended that you sanitize your hands as
well as the device that you will be using such as the laptop, and apply 2-meter social
distancing whenever you are in an internet café during the conduct of the survey.
Strictly follow the health protocols mandated by IATF.

POTENTIAL BENEFITS TO PARTICIPANTS AND/OR TO SOCIETY

This study can generate relevant information which would serve as a way to have a
better understanding of how the instructional leadership given the demand of
complex tasks, they are expected to possess the necessary 21st century skills and
digital competence which brought so many changes in the educational landscape. It
will also provide a substantial contribution to the scarcity of studies in literature that
explores on the variables as used in this study. It will be shared on research
conferences where the explored topic of this study will be considered suitable,
necessary and useful as well as in an online journal which can be more available to
other future researchers.

The direct benefits of the study to the individual respondents are the disclosure of
their information or essential data and the token of solid gratitude to their
participation. As for the society that they represent, the direct benefit would be the
application of 21st century skills and technological capabilities to further the
instructional leadership of their public-school heads. Furthermore, the indirect benefit
of the study to the participants is the consideration of their situations, and the
freedom of terms in participating in the study. There are no strict rules, which allows
them to be flexible and provide data by their own means and convenience.
Additionally, the study will have the society as its beneficiary in terms of having their
students or learners learn more effectively and increase erudition.

DATA PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY

 57

We will keep your records for this study confidential as far as permitted by law. Any
identifiable information obtained in connection with this study will remain confidential,
except if necessary to protect your rights or welfare. This certificate means that the
researcher can resist the release of information about your participation to people
who are not connected with the study. When the results of the research are published
or discussed in conferences, no identifiable information will be used. The researcher is
adhering to the Data Privacy Act of 2012, which states that individuals are protected
from unauthorized collection of personal information that is (1) private and not
publicly accessible; and (2) identifiable, meaning that the individual's identity can be
determined either directly or when combined with other available data.

VOLUNTARINESS OF PARTICIPATION AND RIGHTS TO WITHDRAW FROM THE

RESEARCH
Your participation is voluntary. Your refusal to participate will involve no penalty or
loss of benefits to which you are otherwise entitled. You may withdraw your consent
at any time and discontinue participation without penalty. You are not waiving any
legal claims, rights or remedies because of your participation in this research study.

REIMBURSEMENT AND COMPENSATION

You will be given a token which is a sign of gratitude for helping the researcher in
accomplishing the study. This token will be an assortment of souvenirs. The tokens
will be sent via courier and these will be sealed carefully in a package. Also, each
token will be sanitized before having it sent to your doorstep. The researcher will
refund the money you spent during the data gathering phase such as internet use
that will be used in the study. This will be in cash worth Php50 each which will be
given through GCash or other modes of money transfer available in the locality of the
respondents.

INVESTIGATOR’S CONTACT INFORMATION

If you have any questions or concerns about the research, please feel free to contact
the researcher at the mobile phone number 09076211344 or through email at
[email protected] ; the research adviser, Dr. Edna Salva through email
[email protected] or if you need to see them, they can be located at the Office of the
Senior High School Department, Baganga National High School, M.L. Quezon St.
Baganga Davao Oriental and University of the Immaculate Conception – Graduate
School Program.

RIGHTS OF RESEARCH PARTICIPANT

If you have questions, concerns, or complaints about your right as a research
participant or the research in general and are unable to contact the research team, or
if you want to talk to someone independent of the research team, please contact the
University of the Immaculate Conception Research Publication, and Innovation Center
at 227- 82-86 local 211.

RESEARCH PARTICIPANT’S CONSENT

I have read the information provided above. I have been given a chance to
ask questions. My questions have been answered to my satisfaction, and I
agree to participate in this study. I have been given a copy of this form. I
can withdraw my consent at any time and discontinue participation without
penalty.

______________________________________ 02-17-2022
Signature above Printed Name of Participant Date Signed
 58

To be accomplished by the Researcher Obtaining Consent:

I have explained the research to the participant and answered all of his/her
questions. I believe that he/she understands the information described in
this document and freely consents to participate. (If in GROUP, be sure all
members affix their names and signature, too.)

______________________________________ 02-17-2022
Name of Person Obtaining Consent Date Signed

______________________________________ 02-17-2022
Name of Person Obtaining Consent Date Signed

______________________________________ 02-17-2022
Name of Person Obtaining Consent Date Signed

______________________________________ 02-17-2022
Name of Person Obtaining Consent Date Signed

______________________________________ 02-17-2022
Name of Person Obtaining Consent Date Signed

______________________________________ 02-17-2022
Name of Person Obtaining Consent Date Signed