IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

Hướng dẫn sử dụng Notion AI để ước lượng band điểm và nâng cấp bài viết.
Notion AI giúp nâng cấp từ vựng, liên kết các đoạn mượt mà hơn từ idea của chính
bạn chứ không phải là công cụ sửa lỗi chuyên nghiệp. Yêu cầu người học phải có
kiến thức cơ bản và nắm chắc 4 criteria để tự cải thiện. Cách này chỉ phù hợp cho
các bạn đã có nền Writing vững từ 6.0 trở lên.

1. Đăng nhập Notion

2. Viết bài
3. Profread lỗi chính tả, typo bằng Ms Word, Google Docs hoặc Grammarly.
4. Ask AI → Estimate the band score for this essay. Band điểm chỉ ước
chừng tham khảo nhưng độ chính xác mình đánh giá từ 70-80%.
5. Ask AI → Improve this essay to a 7+ sample. Nhập điểm các bạn muốn,
tuy nhiên chỉ nên từ 0.5- 1 band so với sức của mình để độ chính xác và chi
tiết cao hơn chứ không thể biến một bài từ 5.0 thành 8.0 được.
6. So sánh bài gốc và bài được chỉnh sửa, học từ vựng mới được nâng cấp.
7. Tài khoản Free chỉ sử dụng được 20 lệnh, tương đương 10 bài. Nên nâng cấp
dịch vụ này để được hỏi không giới hạn. Giá $5/ tháng, tự hủy và không tự
động gia hạn thêm. Mình chỉ mua 1 tháng trước thi để luyện W, giá rất phải
chăng so với các dịch vụ chấm chữa Wrtiting khác.
8. Luyện tập nhiều sẽ xây dựng được mindset làm bài vững chắc và triển khai
idea logic.

Xem video ở đây

Tất cả các bài viết trong file này đều được mình viết trong quá trình ôn thi và được
Notion AI chữa, các bản draft và ghi chú từ vựng vẫn còn lưu trên database của
mình. Các bạn vui lòng chỉ sử dụng cho mục đích học tập, KHÔNG LAN TRUYỀN
VỚI MỤC ĐÍCH THƯƠNG MẠI.

CHÚC CÁC BẠN HỌC TỐT!

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 1

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

Đề 1: Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary

employees do. Some people think it is necessary, but others are of the opinion
that it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
SAMPLE TỰ VIẾT
The disparity in salary level between high level managers and the lower level
workers has triggered heated debates. Both sides of the argument will be clearly
discussed in depth before reaching my point of view.
Many people argue that the extended gap in payment between directors and
ordinary employees is inappropriate. It is obvious that average employees are the
fuel of any organization, who often work long hours to complete essential tasks to
ensure the business runs smoothly. Therefore, their effort should be recognized due
to their diligent contribution to the overall success of the company. Moreover, the
increasing income inequality can lead to lower job satisfaction, demotivating those
industrious workers, leading to a decline in their productivity. In some cases,
employees may feel undervalued compared to their superior counterparts.
However, I believe attractive compensation packages for senior executives are
justifiable in a corporate setting, as they are associated with the significant roles
these top-level personnel play in the development of the organization. High level
positions are tasked with managing complex operations, setting long-term goals, and
ensuring profitability, all of which require exceptional leadership, expertise, and
accrued experiences that cannot be handled by other employees. In addition, they
are often involved in important decisions, which directly influence the survival of the
company in a competitive market, leading to greater responsibilities and a more
demanding working environment. For this reason, organizations offer attractive
compensation to attract and retain skilled individuals. Additionally, high salaries serve
as a motivational factor, encouraging their outstanding performance.
To conclude, while I admit the contribution of middle and lower positions in a
company's success, I am of the opinion that top level personnel deserve higher
wages due to their roles and accountabilities. An effective payroll and rewarding
approach will address both concerns of the two subjects, motivating employees,
regardless of their title to work productively in an inclusive environment.

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 2

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

SAMPLE ĐƯỢC CHỈNH SỬA BỞI NOTION AI

In the 21st century, the growing gap between the salaries of directors and ordinary
employees has sparked significant debate. This essay examines both the necessity
of high salaries for directors and the perception of unfairness among employees,
before offering my own perspective on the matter.
High salaries for directors are often justified by the level of responsibility they bear
and the impact of their decisions on the organization. Directors are tasked with
managing complex operations, setting long-term goals, and ensuring profitability, all
of which require exceptional leadership, expertise, and strategic thinking.
Furthermore, their performance directly influences the company's success and the
livelihoods of its employees. For this reason, organizations offer attractive
compensation packages to attract and retain highly skilled individuals capable of
steering the company in the right direction. Additionally, high salaries serve as a
motivational factor, encouraging directors to perform at their best. On the other hand,
many people argue that the large salary disparity between directors and ordinary
employees is unjust. Ordinary employees are the backbone of any organization,
often working long hours to complete essential tasks that keep the business running
smoothly. Without their efforts, the success attributed to directors would not be
possible. Moreover, the increasing income inequality can lead to dissatisfaction,
lower morale, and a sense of alienation among employees. In some cases, such
disparities can create resentment and reduce overall productivity, as employees may
feel undervalued and overworked compared to their higher-paid superiors. In
conclusion, while high salaries for directors may be necessary to attract top talent
and reward their significant responsibilities, it is crucial for organizations to address
the concerns of ordinary employees by ensuring fair treatment and adequate
compensation. In my opinion, bridging this gap by offering better wages and benefits
to all employees can foster a more motivated and harmonious workplace.

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 3

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

Đề 2: Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically

successful and have a clean environment. Others disagree. Discuss both
views and give your opinion.

SAMPLE TỰ VIẾT
The balance between economic prosperity and environmental protection has
become a contentious topic of debate among policymakers worldwide. While some
argue that these objectives can be pursued simultaneously, others contend that they
are mutually exclusive. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting
my own position on this matter.
Those who believe economic growth inevitably compromises environmental quality
present several compelling arguments. Industrial development, including
manufacturing facilities, construction projects, and transportation infrastructure, has
historically been a key driver of economic progress. However, this development often
comes at a significant environmental cost. For instance, many rapidly industrializing
nations face severe environmental degradation through deforestation, resource
depletion, and habitat destruction. China's economic miracle serves as a prime
example, where prioritizing GDP growth has resulted in widespread air and water
pollution, significantly impacting public health and quality of life.
Conversely, proponents of sustainable development argue that economic success
and environmental preservation can coexist through innovative solutions and proper
management. Advanced technologies and renewable energy sources have
demonstrated that countries can maintain economic growth while reducing their
environmental footprint. International agreements such as the Kyoto Protocol and the
UN Sustainable Development Goals have established frameworks for global
cooperation in addressing environmental challenges. Furthermore, the growing
renewable energy sector exemplifies how environmental initiatives can create new
economic opportunities. Progressive governments are increasingly implementing
comprehensive environmental policies, promoting recycling programs, and investing
in public education about resource conservation, proving that long-term economic
and environmental goals can be harmoniously aligned.
In conclusion, while reconciling economic development with environmental protection
presents significant challenges and requires coordinated effort from multiple

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 4

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

stakeholders, I believe this balance is both achievable and necessary. Through the
adoption of sustainable practices, investment in green technologies, and enhanced
public awareness, nations can minimize environmental damage while maintaining
economic growth, ultimately creating a more sustainable and prosperous society for
future generations.
SAMPLE ĐƯỢC CHỈNH SỬA BỞI NOTION AI
The relationship between economic prosperity and environmental protection has
become a subject of intense debate among policymakers worldwide. While some
argue that these objectives are mutually exclusive, others maintain that technological
innovation and strategic planning can enable nations to achieve both simultaneously.
This essay will critically examine both perspectives before presenting a well-
reasoned position.
Proponents of the first view contend that economic development inevitably
compromises environmental integrity. They argue that industrial expansion,
characterized by extensive manufacturing operations, infrastructure development,
and transportation networks, inherently drives economic growth at the environment's
expense. This phenomenon manifests in various forms of environmental
degradation: large-scale deforestation to accommodate industrial zones, accelerated
depletion of natural resources to meet burgeoning consumer demands, and severe
atmospheric pollution from industrial emissions. For instance, China's remarkable
economic transformation over recent decades has been accompanied by severe
environmental consequences, with numerous cities experiencing hazardous levels of
air pollution and widespread ecological deterioration.
Conversely, advocates for sustainable development present compelling evidence
that economic success and environmental preservation can coexist harmoniously.
Advanced technologies and innovative approaches have revolutionized how nations
can pursue growth while minimizing ecological impact. The emergence of
international environmental frameworks, such as the Paris Agreement and the UN
Sustainable Development Goals, demonstrates a global commitment to reconciling
economic and environmental objectives. Furthermore, the renewable energy sector
exemplifies how environmental consciousness can drive economic growth, with
countries like Denmark and Germany leading the way in creating jobs while
significantly reducing their carbon footprint. These nations have successfully

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 5

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

implemented comprehensive environmental policies, including stringent emission

standards, incentives for green technologies, and extensive public education
programs, proving that economic prosperity need not compromise environmental
stewardship.
In conclusion, while historical evidence suggests a tension between economic
growth and environmental protection, contemporary developments demonstrate that
these goals are increasingly compatible. Through strategic implementation of
sustainable technologies, robust environmental policies, and international
cooperation, nations can pursue economic development while safeguarding their
natural resources. The key lies in recognizing that environmental protection and
economic growth are not opposing forces but rather complementary aspects of
sustainable development that, when properly balanced, can lead to lasting prosperity
for both current and future generations.

Đề 3: Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh
water as much as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control
the use of fresh water. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
SAMPLE TỰ VIẾT
The debate of whether people should have the freedom to use fresh water or it
should be restricted by authorities has gained public attention recently. This essay
will examine both arguments in depth and explain why I am more inclined to the idea
that imposing stricter regulations is essential.
On the one hand, there are various reasons for those who support unlimited water
usage. It is clear that water is one of the most crucial necessities and a fundamental
human right. Therefore, unrestricted access allows everyone to meet the basic
needs for healthy development. Besides, it is rational for residents to use water as
much as they demand, since they already pay for the consumption.
On the other hand, there are compelling arguments for the need of government
control of fresh water usage. Like other resources, water depletion has become an
alarming issue for several regions, due to the serious effects of climate change and
overpopulation. This is because the majority of human activities heavily rely on water
resources, including drinking, residential purposes, agriculture, and manufacturing. If
this resource is exploited excessively, a severe water crisis would happen, strongly

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 6

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

affecting not only the environment but also becoming a matter of survival. Strict
regulations can ensure that water is used efficiently and meets the needs of all,
including those in water-scarce regions.
In conclusion, although unrestricted usage of fresh water benefits inhabitants, I
would argue that it is imperative for policy makers to strictly manage the accessibility
to this vital resource. Both individuals and governments should be responsible for
ensuring water sustainability and preservation for future generations.
SAMPLE ĐƯỢC CHỈNH SỬA BỞI NOTION AI
The issue of whether people should have unrestricted access to fresh water or if its
use should be strictly controlled by governments is a contentious one. This essay will
explore both perspectives and provide my own opinion on the matter.
On the one hand, many people believe that access to fresh water is a fundamental
human right, and therefore individuals should be free to use as much of it as they
need. Water is essential for life, and unrestricted access ensures that everyone can
meet their basic needs without interference. Moreover, in regions where water is
plentiful, restrictions may seem unnecessary and could be viewed as an overreach
of government authority. For example, farmers and industries that rely heavily on
water may argue that limitations could impede their productivity and economic
contributions.
On the other hand, there are compelling arguments for the need for government
regulation of fresh water usage. Fresh water is a finite resource, and with the
growing global population and the effects of climate change, its scarcity is becoming
an increasingly critical issue. If left unchecked, overconsumption and wastage could
lead to severe shortages, affecting not only the environment but also future
generations. Strict controls can help ensure that water is used sustainably and
distributed equitably, preventing the depletion of this vital resource. For instance,
regulating water use can help protect ecosystems and ensure that there is enough
water to meet the needs of all, including those in water-scarce regions.
In conclusion, while the unrestricted use of fresh water may seem desirable,
particularly from the perspective of individual rights, I believe that government
regulation is necessary to ensure the sustainable management of this essential
resource. The future of our water supply depends on striking a balance between
meeting current needs and preserving water for future generations.

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 7

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

Đề 4: Some people think the government should pay for health care and
education, but others believe it's not the government’s responsibility. Discuss
both views and give your opinion.
SAMPLE TỰ VIẾT
The topic of whether citizens or the authorities are responsible for basic needs such
as health service and studying has become the issue of broad interest to general
public. I will explore both sides of the argument through justifications and present my
view.
On the one hand, there are valid reasons to advocate for people who hold the notion
that these service should be self-funded. First and foremost, it is rational that
healthcare and education are vital elements which directly benefit individuals. Every
citizen should be aware of their current health condition and education level, as they
are able to develop a self-reliance as well as access to a greater availability of
healthcare and education providers, where people could find the right match for their
demand and preference. In addition, paying for such services as a personal duty
would reduce the burden on state budget, allowing government to allocate tax
revenue to other urgent sectors, such as transportation and social works
On the other hand, many people believe that such fundamentals should be provided
by the government as they are considered as the compulsory part of national
welfare. It is imperative for government, in cooperation with multiple parties, to
ensure all the members of society, regardless of age, gender and income level, to
access health care and educational system. This is because those basic demands
are essential in nurturing a robust and knowledgeable labor force, since they are the
decisive factors leading to the overall-wellbeing and a nation’s economic progress. It
is justifiable that when the general citizenry is sufficiently equipped with fundamental
needs, they are more likely to contribute to the growth of the country.
To conclude, while the argument for individual responsibility in healthcare and
education is compelling, I believe that government should play a central role in
offering these services, due to its importance in social justice as well as future
developments. A balanced approach, whether the government provides basic
service, while encouraging private organizations involvement, would facilitate
innovations and efficiency, ensuring the best quality and benefits a large population
in those core sectors.

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 8

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

SAMPLE ĐƯỢC CHỈNH SỬA BỞI NOTION AI

The debate over whether the government should fund health care and education or if
these responsibilities should fall to individuals is ongoing. This essay will explore
both perspectives and provide my own opinion on the matter.
On the one hand, many people believe that the government should provide free
health care and education to all citizens. They argue that access to these essential
services is a fundamental human right and that the government has a responsibility
to ensure that everyone, regardless of their economic status, can access quality
health care and education. This perspective is rooted in the belief that a healthy and
educated population is crucial for the overall well-being and progress of society. For
instance, government-funded health care ensures that all citizens can receive
necessary medical treatment, which in turn contributes to a healthier workforce.
Similarly, providing free education can help break the cycle of poverty by giving
everyone, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds, the opportunity to
improve their lives through learning.
On the other hand, some argue that the government should not be responsible for
funding health care and education, as this can lead to increased taxes and
government spending, which might not be sustainable in the long run. They believe
that individuals should take responsibility for their own health care and education, as
this would encourage self-reliance and reduce the financial burden on the state.
Additionally, they argue that private sector involvement can lead to higher-quality
services due to competition, which can drive innovation and efficiency. This view is
often supported by those who believe that government intervention in these sectors
can lead to inefficiencies and lower standards of care and education.
In conclusion, while the argument for individual responsibility in health care and
education is valid, I believe that the government should play a central role in
providing these services. Ensuring that all citizens have access to health care and
education is not only a matter of social justice but also an investment in the future of
the country. A balanced approach, where the government provides basic services
while encouraging private sector involvement to enhance quality, could offer the best
of both worlds.

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 9

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

Đề 5: Some people think watching TV is bad for children, while others think
that it is good for children to get knowledge. Discuss both views and give your
own opinion.

SAMPLE TỰ VIẾT
The influence of television on children's behavior is a topic of considerable debate.
While watching TV is beneficial to children to some extent, I strongly believe that the
drawbacks should not be overlooked.
On the one hand, televisions are practical resources facilitating children’s learning
experience. Exposing to well-designed shows prompts children’s interest in a
specific area, motivating them to learn about the field. Watching education-oriented
programs such as sciences documentary allows young schoolers to acquire
considerable amounts of knowledge, fostering curiosity and enhance their learning
experience. Moreover, television can broaden children’s horizons by introducing
them to informative shows of different cultures, languages, and perspectives, which
reinforce their understanding in various areas, which is a crucial preparation for later
life.
On the other hand, excessive watching time can lead to detrimental impacts on
children’s physical well-being as well as their psychological behavior . For example,
kids who have extended screen time can lead to a sedentary lifestyle, increasing the
risk of obesity. They are more likely to suffer from various health problems, such as
strained eyes and sleeping disorder as the effect of a sedentary lifestyle, increasing
the risk of obesity. Additionally, the content of television programs can sometimes be
inappropriate for young viewers, they may illustrate violence or mature themes,
which seriously impact their behavior or mislead their perspective. Therefore, it is
essential to strictly regulate and monitor children’s exposure to TV.
To conclude, TV maybe a useful educational tools for children to accumulate different
knowledge, its negative effects on children development are by far more significant.
Both parents and educators should share mutual responsibility to control their usage,
not only in the content it provides but also the screen time as well.

SAMPLE ĐƯỢC CHỈNH SỬA BỞI NOTION AI

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 10

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

The impact of television on children has sparked a long-standing debate, with some
arguing that it is detrimental, while others believe it is a valuable source of
knowledge. This essay will explore both viewpoints and provide my perspective on
how television affects children’s development.
It is often believed that watching television is harmful to children, primarily due to its
potential negative effects on their physical and mental well-being. For example,
excessive screen time can lead to a sedentary lifestyle, increasing the risk of obesity
and other health issues. Moreover, prolonged exposure to screens can strain
children’s eyes and disrupt their sleep patterns, which are essential for healthy
growth. Additionally, the content of television programs can sometimes be
inappropriate for young viewers, exposing them to violence or mature themes that
may influence their behavior or shape their understanding of the world in undesirable
ways.
However, there is another perspective that highlights the educational benefits of
television. When utilized properly, television can serve as an excellent tool for
learning. Educational programs designed for children can help them develop
essential skills in areas such as literacy, numeracy, and science. For instance,
channels like National Geographic and PBS Kids provide content that is not only
engaging but also informative, fostering curiosity and a love for learning.
Furthermore, television can broaden children’s horizons by introducing them to
different cultures, languages, and perspectives, which is crucial in today’s
increasingly globalized world.
In conclusion, while there are valid concerns about the negative effects of television
on children, it also has significant potential as an educational resource. In my
opinion, the key is moderation and careful selection of content. Parents should
monitor what their children watch and set reasonable limits on screen time to ensure
that television becomes a tool for learning rather than a source of harm. In the future,
I believe finding this balance will be crucial in leveraging television as a positive
influence on children’s development.

Đề 6: Some people think that the increase in international travel has a negative
impact on the environment and should be restricted. To what extent do you
agree or disagree with this opinion?

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 11

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

SAMPLE TỰ VIẾT
Trans-continental flights have become popular these days for travelling purposes .
Many people hold the opinion that it is essential to limit international aviation due to
its detrimental impacts on the environment. I would oppose the idea through the
following arguments.
It is apparent that overseas flights, which usually take longer hours to operate,
require huge fossil fuels for their long-distance carriage. Thus, it is considered a
major culprit of air pollution when a significant amount of CO2 is released into the
atmosphere, degrading air quality and accelerating global warming. Another problem
associated with the aviation industry is damaging ecological degradation, where
tourist facilities, such as hotels, restaurants and theme parks, are constructed at the
expense of natural untouched landscape or forests, leading to severe influences is
wildlife habitat destruction, resource depletion and pollution. Without intervention,
these problems will continue to escalate.
However, restricting international flights seems to be an impossible approach, as the
tourism and logistics industry heavily relies on this primary means of transport.
These sectors are the backbone of some countries’ economies, as they provide
numerous job opportunities for local communities, as well as their vital source of
income/ means of sustenance. Besides, as the world becomes more connected,
inhibiting such universal flights would hinder the progress of globalization, which
allows plenty of beneficial exchanges in various areas, including education,
technology, and cultural enrichment. Therefore, regulating aviation services could
hurt national economies and narrow down the connection between countries.
In conclusion, while I admit that the operation of international flights may exacerbate
the environmental issues, I believe they also contribute greatly to the globalization
progress as well as the economic growth. Hence, minimizing their negative impacts
through feasible implementations would be more effective than implementing such a
conservative curbing recommendation.
SAMPLE ĐƯỢC CHỈNH SỬA BỞI NOTION AI
International air travel has witnessed unprecedented growth in recent decades,
becoming the preferred mode of transport for millions worldwide. Numerous
individuals advocate for imposing restrictions on cross-border flights due to their

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 12

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

detrimental environmental impacts. However, I would argue that such limitations

would be counterproductive, and alternative approaches should be considered.
Undeniably, long-haul flights contribute significantly to environmental degradation
through various mechanisms. These journeys consume vast quantities of fossil fuels
during their extended operations, releasing substantial amounts of carbon dioxide
into the atmosphere. This emission pattern not only diminishes air quality but also
accelerates the global warming phenomenon at an alarming rate. Furthermore, the
aviation industry indirectly stimulates ecological deterioration through associated
infrastructure development. The construction of tourist facilities, including hotels,
restaurants, and recreational venues—frequently occurs at the expense of pristine
natural landscapes and forest ecosystems. This transformation inevitably results in
wildlife habitat fragmentation, natural resource depletion, and various forms of
environmental pollution. Without strategic intervention, these ecological challenges
will inevitably intensify.
Nevertheless, implementing restrictions on international air travel would be
impractical and potentially detrimental to global development. The tourism and
logistics sectors function as critical pillars of many national economies, particularly in
developing regions. These industries generate substantial employment opportunities
for local communities and often serve as their primary source of income. Moreover,
as globalization continues to advance, limiting international flights would impede
crucial cross-cultural exchanges and collaborations in vital fields such as education,
technological innovation, and cultural enrichment. Consequently, excessive
regulation of aviation services could undermine economic prosperity while
simultaneously constraining international cooperation and understanding.
In conclusion, while I acknowledge that international air travel contributes
significantly to environmental challenges, I maintain that its benefits to economic
development and global integration are equally substantial. Rather than
implementing restrictive measures, a more balanced approach would involve
developing and adopting environmentally sustainable aviation technologies,
implementing carbon offset programs, and promoting responsible tourism practices.
These strategies would effectively mitigate the negative environmental impacts while
preserving the invaluable benefits of international mobility and connectivity.

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 13

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

Đề 7: Some believe that because everyone needs a place to live, governments

should provide houses for those who are too poor to afford their own. To what
extent do you agree or disagree?
SAMPLE TỰ VIẾT
While housing is undeniably a fundamental human necessity, the proposition that
governments should provide free accommodation for all citizens requires careful
consideration. Although such a policy could potentially address housing inequality, I
believe it would be both economically unsustainable and potentially
counterproductive to society's broader development.
The primary argument for government-provided housing stems from its status as a
basic human need. According to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, shelter is essential for
human survival and development, alongside food and water. In many nations,
soaring real estate prices have created a housing crisis, making property ownership
virtually impossible for lower-income groups. This situation can significantly impact
individuals' quality of life and their ability to contribute meaningfully to society. When
people struggle with housing insecurity, their focus shifts from productive activities to
mere survival, potentially hampering economic growth.
Nevertheless, implementing universal free housing would pose substantial
challenges to national economies and social systems. Firstly, such a program would
place an unprecedented strain on government budgets, potentially diverting
resources from other crucial sectors such as education and healthcare, which are
equally vital for societal welfare. Furthermore, the construction and maintenance of
large-scale public housing projects could distort property markets and potentially
decrease overall housing quality. Instead, governments should consider more
sustainable alternatives, such as targeted housing subsidies, rent control measures,
and tax incentives for affordable housing development. These approaches could
make housing more accessible while maintaining market efficiency and encouraging
private sector participation.
In conclusion, while ensuring access to adequate housing is crucial for societal well-
being, providing free housing for all citizens would be neither practical nor beneficial
in the long term. A more balanced approach combining targeted assistance
programs with market-based solutions would better serve both social needs and
economic sustainability. Governments should focus on creating comprehensive

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 14

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

housing policies that address affordability while maintaining fiscal responsibility and
market dynamics.
SAMPLE ĐƯỢC CHỈNH SỬA BỞI NOTION AI
Housing is a fundamental human need, and many argue that governments should
provide housing for individuals who cannot afford it. I agree that governments have a
responsibility to address homelessness and housing insecurity, but I also believe that
a sustainable approach should involve a combination of direct support and initiatives
to empower people economically.
On the one hand, providing housing for the poor is essential for ensuring basic
human dignity and reducing inequality. Without a stable place to live, individuals face
significant barriers to access education, healthcare, and employment opportunities,
perpetuating cycles of poverty.
Government-funded housing programs can provide a safety net for the most
vulnerable, ensuring that no one is left without shelter. For example, social housing
projects in countries like Singapore and Sweden have successfully reduced
homelessness and improved living standards for low-income families. Moreover,
secure housing can foster social stability and reduce societal costs associated with
homelessness, such as healthcare and law enforcement expenses
On the other hand, providing free housing may not address the root causes of
poverty. Long-term solutions require empowering individuals through job creation,
education, and affordable housing initiatives. For instance, governments could
subsidize rent or partner with private developers to build affordable housing options
rather than solely constructing public housing. Additionally, programs that promote
skill development and financial literacy can help people achieve self-sufficiency,
reducing dependence on government aid.
In conclusion, while I agree that governments should ensure housing for those
unable to afford it, this should be part of a broader strategy that addresses the
underlying causes of poverty. A balanced approach combining direct assistance with
empowerment programs is key to creating a sustainable and equitable society.
The notion that housing is a fundamental need and that governments should provide
free houses for everyone is a topic of considerable debate. This essay will explore
different viewpoints on the feasibility and implications of such a policy and will
present my perspective on the matter.

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 15

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

Housing is undoubtedly a basic human necessity, crucial for health, security, and
overall well-being. Providing free housing could significantly address issues of
homelessness and housing inequality, ensuring that everyone has a stable and
secure place to live. In many cases, governments already offer subsidized housing
or support programs to assist those in need, demonstrating a commitment to
addressing housing concerns. Such measures can help alleviate the burden on low-
income individuals and families, contributing to a more equitable society.
However, implementing a policy of free housing for everyone poses several
challenges. The financial cost of such an initiative would be enormous and could
place a significant strain on public resources. Additionally, there are concerns about
the potential impact on housing markets and property values, as well as the risk of
reduced incentives for private sector investment in housing. Furthermore, managing
and maintaining a large-scale free housing program could lead to bureaucratic
inefficiencies and potential issues with quality and allocation.
In conclusion, while the idea of providing free housing aligns with the goal of
addressing basic needs and promoting social equity, its practical implementation
presents significant challenges. A more balanced approach might involve expanding
affordable housing programs and improving access to housing for those in need,
while also considering the financial sustainability and efficiency of such policies.

Đề 8: The best way to make the road transport of goods safer is to ask drivers
to take a driving test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
SAMPLE ĐƯỢC CHỈNH SỬA BỞI NOTION AI
Many people claim that the optimal approach to enhance road safety is requiring
drivers to retake driving tests on an annual basis. While I believe this method may
secure their driving skills, I am of the opinion that the combination of other practices,
including stricter punishments for the traffic violation, and improving public
awareness on traffic laws, could be more significant.
On the one hand, several compelling reasons explain why taking driving test every
year is an effective method contributing to traffic safety. Truck drivers, who take the
test on a regular basis, will enhance their driving and problem-solving skills when
they encountered unwanted problems while commuting. Besides, these frequent
tests also ensure test takers adhere to road regulations and avoid bad driving habits,

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 16

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

increasing their understanding about traffic laws, which may be changed and
updated regularly. Such regular testing could serve to refresh their knowledge and
enforce accountability, allowing only qualified and capable drivers to operate heavy
vehicles.
On the other hand, the imposing harsh penalties are promising in reducing traffic
accidents. This is because heavy fines would act as a deterrent against serious
driving behaviors. After being punished strictly, those wrongdoers may be afraid of
recommitting next time, causing them become more prudent while traveling.
Furthermore, promoting public understanding is also considered as the prominent
solution to maintain traffic safety. It is essential that detailed campaigns should be
enacted widely in both educational institutions and workplaces to spread useful and
appropriate conduct to all residents. With stringent management through punishment
and education system, road transport would be improved effectively.
In conclusion, although requiring annual driving test ensures the driving standards in
goods transporting, it is not the solely implementation. A more comprehensive
approach, including reinforcement of traffic regulations to the general public and
stricter punishments for driving offense, offers greater benefits in creating a safety
driving system.

Đề 9: Some people think that the only way to improve road safety is to give
much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree
or disagree?
SAMPLE ĐƯỢC CHỈNH SỬA BỞI NOTION AI
A large number of people claim that in order to enhance road safety, imposing
stricter punishments on drivers who are in charge of traffic crimes would be the most
effective implementation. While I admit that such rigorous regulations would act as a
deterrent to misbehaved commuters, I am of the opinion that other measures, such
as promoting better public understanding and harder getting a driving license, are of
equal importance to ensure traffic safety.
On the one hand, the effectiveness of imposing stricter punishments is proven in
many regions of the world. Taking Vietnam as a typical example from the beginning
of 2024, heavier fines have been officially enacted, resulting in the notable decline in
the number of traffic accidents nationwide as well as lower the re-offended rate

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 17

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

during only six months. This is because these solutions offer a wide range of
warning to drivers who are fully aware of the seriousness offenses caused, which
jeopardizes not only drivers themselves but also other individuals commuting at the
same time and place. Additionally, after being punished strictly, those wrongdoers
may be afraid of recommitting next time, causing them to become more careful while
traveling.
On the other hand, I believe that such policies are not sufficient to maintain public
traffic safety. First, the fundamental procedure should rely on educating the public
awareness on the destructive repercussions of traffic accidents caused by careless
and impulsive actions. It is essential that campaigns should be promoted widely in
both educational institutions and workplaces to spread useful and appropriate
conduct to all residents. For example, those regulations should be promoted in
school curriculum as well as training programs for employees to provide useful
knowledge on traffic laws. Furthermore, stringent requirements should be processed
in issuing driving licenses, leading to an outcome that allows only prudent and
mindful drivers to have the permission to control their private vehicles. Such novel
proposals would be expected to lower the likelihood of driving offenses, rather than
punishing offenders.
In conclusion, although stricter punishments will remind drivers of their mistakes and
prevent them from reoffending later, I would argue that it is not the only method to
ensure road safety. A balanced approach, such as educating the public to avoid bad
driving behaviors and more arduous amendments in licensing vehicles, are
promising in reducing traffic violations.

Đề 10: Some people think that it is better for older schoolchildren to study a
large number of subjects and develop a range of knowledge. Others argue that
they should study a smaller number of subjects and focus on details. Discuss
both views and give your opinion.

SAMPLE ĐƯỢC CHỈNH SỬA BỞI NOTION AI

The topic of whether integrating a variety of subjects or concentrating on fewer
subjects in greater depth in the school curriculum has sparked a contentious debate
for the general public. While many people hold the opinion that studying a wide

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 18

 IELTS TASK 2 ESSAY – RIYUUNACHAN

range of subjects contributes to the comprehensive development of schoolchildren, I

would argue that the concentration on some fundamental courses are more effective.
On the one hand, many proponents believe that vast exposure to a diversified
curriculum will help students to become well-rounded individuals. Besides the
knowledge acquired from mandatory majors such as math, literature and foreign
language, perceiving knowledge in a broader range, for instance: arts, informatics
and social sciences, allows them to sharpen crucial skills and cultivate more insights
to diverse societal facets, all of which are essential factors to thrive in professional
development, as they are able to handle interdisciplinary nature of modern
professions, and more adaptable to mixed cultural workplace.
On the other hand, it is challenging for high school students to be adept at an
immense knowledge from different fields, while narrowing the scope of study is more
achievable. Focusing on fewer subjects allows students to delve deeper into those
areas, leading to a more thorough and specialized understanding. They can build a
grasp foundation that prepares their future expertise efficiently. For example, a
student who wants to enter medical school has to equip themselves with biology and
chemistry rather than spreading their effort across unrelated areas like history or
geography. This focused approach is more likely to strengthen their skills in such
specialization and reduce the mental burden caused by varied lectures.
In conclusion, while studying a blend of different subjects offers great benefits in
expanding knowledge and fostering comprehensive growth, I strongly believe that
the advantages gained from focusing solely on the fundamental domain are much
greater the in educational setting. Specializing allows students to deepen their
expertise, as well as cultivate the necessary skills required for their future profession.

Sample by Vy Le- Powered by Notion AI 19