TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME = 05/01/2025 07:45 NAME =: ADA BOZGOZ FAX: 4108748907 TEL: SER. # : U67059K4N353807 DATE, TIME 06/01__07:36 FAX NO. /NAME. 9257555741 DURATION 00:09: 14 PAGE(S) & SULT Hone ‘STANDARD ECM To: HR Representing handing Lance Fulgium’s | From: Sender Lance Fulgium’s ADA Advocate case Col M. Sue Bozgo2, Sovereign/MOOR ADA Advocate concern about illegal retaliation against Lance after being discriminated against | | Reason: ADA Accommodation and requested | meeting under the 1990 ADA Act | about 28 Feb 2025, 1am more concerned about the outcome ofthe company’s investigation. | need meone to help me understand the attached LAST WARNING, Please be advised that | am an ADA \dvocate for too many wounded warriors to count and Lance’s father was an Ethic’s attorney for the ‘tire military. We currently have an open lawsuit against the United States Inc. Do we need to includeDECLARATION OF MARGARET BOZGOZ, LANCE FULGIUM’S ADA ADVOCATE |, Lieutenant Colonel (R) Margaret Sue Bozgoz, Native Hawaiian/Moor make the following statement under oath to the best of my ability and recollection. | am an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Advocate for several Civilian and Wounded Warrior Women [with silent scars] in the Military and Veterans Affairs Employees throughout the Americas. | became Lance Fulgium's ADA Advocate when he was born as | am his mother. My duties as an ADA Advocate are to know the ADA Law and to serve a unique and critical function in implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act to secure equal access on the job and in courtrooms. The law is clear that an advocate ensures the functionality of the client is protected under the ADAAA against all harassment, retaliation, and false accusation More specifically, | come onto the case as a consultant and based on (1) client's disability and symptoms, (2) review each case to determine what effective reasonable accommodations are needed at work and in the courtroom during Reasonable ‘Accommodation Request and legal proceedings, (3) Arrange evaluations to assess what client's needs are, apart from formal accommodations, (4) prepare a request that is confidentially provided to Human Resources and the access coordinator of the court, requesting the accommodations. Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz—P age |1In my spare time, | also teach: (1) the importance of Subject Matter Jurisdiction/Sufficiency of Pleadings in the competent courtroom. htips://www.youtube,com/watch?v= fShAc4UCyQ REAL TIME RICO CASE AGAINST USA INC Military and (2) the procedures to follow under Title Il (See Tennessee vs. Lane et al., 541 US. 509, (2004) In June/July 2024, | asked Lance to inform his boss (Brandon Cronin, Warehouse Manager) of his disability and he falls under the 1990 ADA Act. In July 2024, Lance informed me that he informed his boss of his disability, and his boss said it was no problem. Under Executive 13164 his boss should have filed his disability to his professional establishment On or about 28 February 2025, Lance informed me that he was triggered by someone at work. This person disturbed Lance by joking/talking about MOORS/NIGGERS. This person apparently did not know Lance's Nationality. Lance said he was so shocked by this behavior that he asked this person to repeat what he had said to ensure he did not misunderstand On 30 April 2025, Lance informed me that his work, MARKSTEIN SALES CO family owned since 1919 investigated and gave Lance the attached FINAL WARNING (Exhibit 1, Final Warning). The final notice warning stated that Lance acted aggressively towards two employees as if he was to about to fight them for offensive racist behavior. Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz - Page |2The Final Warning also states that the Markstein Employee Handbook, Section 2010 #7 that the following may result in disciplinary action, including immediate termination, fighting, threatening physical violence, or acting in a physical threatening manner. The Company's Representative (Exhibit 1) reminded Lance of the serious of his behavior and if no change of improvement occurs, or if he has other performance issues not acceptable to the Company, he will be subject to further disciplinary actions which, depending on the circumstances can include termination of his employment FYI the Department of Justice is investigating TITLE VII cases in CA of the 1964 Act. | mention this because the evidence shows that they need to investigate your Company too! U.S. Justice Department Launches Investigation of University of California Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ‘On 30 April 2025, Lance contacted me as he was disturbed about the retaliation against him as he knows his rights (Exhibit 1). | told Lance to get me his HR's email, phone number and fax number which he did (Exhibit 2). | also told Lance to sign an ADA release proving that his father and | were his ADA Advocate (Exhibit 2). Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz— Page |31am asking for the following 1990 ADA under Titles II and Ill. Titles II states nobody gets immunity for violating the ADA ACT. Title Ill states man made law can be changed on the spot should human rights be violated. This should be listed under the 1964 Title Vil in the company's handbook * 42 USC 1983 KKK Act, and 1964 Civil Rights Act states Lance has the right to. work without being discriminated against. * As far as | can tell and based on the attached (Exhibit 1), an investigation should have taken place. | request a copy of the investigation as the following has been violated. 18 USC 241 o 18USC 242 o 18USC 245 © 18 USC 249 (Hate Crimes) 42 USC 1983 KKK 42 USC 1985 as Lance's Boss and HR Representative should have known about this disability as per Executive order 13164 but they gave Lance the attached LAST WARNING? This is a clear ADA and 42 USC 1985 violation! 42 USC 1986 ° Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz- Page |4‘Also to retaliate against Lance for being triggered by workers at work is an 18 USC 1512 FELONY! Your Professional Establishment's Handbook should include this as well. Lance should be able to file an EEOC complaint or 1964 Lawsuit vs receiving a Warning! Ref the 1964 Civil Rights Act and A company cannot accept any federal contracts and violate the 1964 Act! The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964) is a landmark civil rights and labor law in the United States that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin." It prohibits unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in schools and public accommodations, and employment discrimination. The act "remains one of the most significant legislative achievements jin American history Initially, the powers given to enforce the act were weak, but these were supplemented during later years. Congress asserted its authority to legislate under several different parts of the United Slates Constitution, principally ts enumerated power to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause of Articie |, Section 8, its duty to guarantee all citizens equal protection of the laws under the 14th Amendment, and its duty to protect voting rights under the 15th, Amendment The legislation was proposed by President John F_Kennedy in June 1963, but it was opposed by filbuster in the Senate. After Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963, President Lyncion B. Johnson pushed the bill forward. The United States House of Represeniatives passed the bill on February 10, 1964, and after a 72-day fiibuster, it passed the United States Senate on June 19, 1964. The final vote was 290-130 in the House of Representatives and 73-27 in the Senate." After the House agreed to a subsequent Senate ‘amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed into law by President Johnson at the White House on July 2, 1964 Reconstruction and New Deal era In the 1883 landmark Civil Rights Cases, the United States Supreme Court had ruled that Congress did not have the power to prohibit discrimination in the private sector, thus stripping the Civil Rights Act of 1875 of much of its abiliy to protect civil rights. In the late 19th and early 20th century, the legal justification for voiding the Civil Rights Act of 1875 was part of a larger trend by the United States Supreme Court majorities to invalidate most government regulations of the private sector, except when dealing with laws designed to protect traditional public morality. In the 1930s, during the New Deal, the majorty of the Supreme Court justices gradually shilted their legal theory to allow for greater government regulation of the private sector under the Commerce Clause, thus paving the way for the federal government to enact civil rights laws prohibiting both public and private sector discrimination on the basis of the commerce clause. Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz — P age |5Reasonable Accommodation requested: Accommodation Stress/Emotions ADA Advocate to protect Lance from further discrimination ADA meeting as Lance cannot go to any further meeting without me that would be an ADA violation. HR Should know this (EXHIBIT C) Allow telephone calls during work hours to doctors, ADA Advocate and others for needed support. Use a mentor or supervisor to alert Lance when his behavior is triggered. Restructured job to include only essential functions during times of stress. Flexible schedule to keep Lance away from the KKK members who willfully violate his rights Modified work break schedule to keep Lance away from the TRIGGERS. Flex place Coworker Interaction Provide disability awareness training to coworkers and supervisors. Provide day-to-day guidance and feedback Provide written job instruction. Develop Clear expectations of responsibilities and the consequences of not meeting performance standards. Allow for open communications. Establish written long term and short-term goals. Develop strategies to deal with conflict Educate all employees on their right to accommodations. Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz - Page |6* Provide sensitivity training to coworkers and supervisors Reason for request: Lance has disabilities and is protected under the 1990 ADA Act, Titles |, I, and III Lance was triggered by discriminating behavior of employees at his workplace. Lance was discriminated against by the HR representative because (1) Lance told her that he was a MOOR, (2) Lance told his boss in July 2024 that he had a disability. The HR representative and boss should have protected Lance vs give him a LAST WARNING! THIS (Exhibit 1) IS A CLEAR OPEN PROBLEM WITH THE HR SECTION from a Professional Establishment that has been in business since 1919! Lance is a hard worker. He is quiet about his PTSD, ADD, ADHD, and anxiety, which he has been battling for most of his life. He has a physical disability which he can disclose if he likes, however, with continued direction, structure, and open lines of communication, he is an asset to any organization. If you need to reach me, you may call me at 410-858-0107, or email me at [email protected] | swear under the penalty of perjury that the above statements are true based on my knowledge and beliefs. Dated this 1 day of May 2025 Margaret S. Bozgoz Lance Fulgium’s ADA Advocate, Native Hawaiian, MOOR, Sovereign Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz—P age |7Exhibit Summary Exhibit 1: Warning Exhibit 2: Proof of Release signed by Company Exhibit 3: ADA Violation Exhibit 4: Executive Order 13164 Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz ~P age |8Exhibit 1: Warning Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz- Page |9Exhibit 2: Proof of Release signed by Company Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz- Page |10ADA Interference Sobers quetonto nce yo Wh ey fete Moret ean worker maby Ak ‘reat Order 13684 Exhibit 3: ADA Violation 42 U.S, Code § 12203. Prohibition against retaliation and coercion (o) Reruero8 ets sll eco att oy vd acai i ial cops ‘Grrr woe teow ys Sl obese ck AR em Chore, ted, std apa ny monn nan ves, gorse, ‘honing under eer (©) tereneatuc,cornioyom eroaeo ‘evn elomant or att fbr herent ee ‘Sous fis ning eo encage ay tera th te Stormer oy rot pote or rte by thee (6) Ramones ao enosoens ‘Ra mater be cnr oral drat ‘ie aa be vata To apg ved perso Yor Wations of subsections (0) ot (), wth ‘especie suche Land bop I epee (00-55, we 503,26 190,18 stat. 270) Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz— Page |11Exhibit 4: Executive Order 13164 I. INITIATING THE ACCOMMODATION PROCESS BASIC ELEMENTS (See 13164, Policy Guidance at questions 1-6): + Explain that accommodation requests can be made by either an applicant or an employee. ‘+ Make clear that accommodation requests can be either oral or in writing, + Do not require that accommodation requests use any particular words (like “reasonable accommodation" or "“disability"). ‘+ Provide the request confirmation form as an attachment to the procedures if the procedures require an applicant or employee to complete such a form for record-keeping purposes. + Require immediate processing of all oral accommodation requests. Do not permit waiting until a written request or record-keeping confirmation form is. received. + Ifrequiring a request confirmation form, do not require an employee who needs a type of reasonable accommodation on a repeated basis (e.g., a sign language interpreter) to submit the written form each time the accommodation is needed. + Do not require that an accommodation request be made at a certain time. + Allow more than one agency official to be designated to receive accommodation requests. *+ Include information on all the agency officials to whom an applicant or employee may make an accommodation request. * Allow a request for reasonable accommodation to be made by either the individual with a disability or a family member, health professional, or other ig on the individual's behalf. representative a Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz - Page | 12a & 18 U.S. Code CHAPTER 13— CIVIL RIGHTS fe Notes rey | next 15241. Conspiracy against rights Nobody gets to violate vou right. Your rights are property ~ guard. 5212. Deptvaten of rahts ender cle of > $242, Exon of urrs on account of rae or eser Gis 5244. Discrimination against person wearing uniform of armed forces 5.245, Federally protected activities ADA Advocates[ADA interfesencs 55.246. Deprivation of relief benefits 5247. Damage to religious property; obstruction of persons In the free exercise of religious belefs 5.248. Freedom of access to dipie entcances § 249, Hate crime acts Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz ~ Page | 1318 U.S. Code § 249 - Hate crime acts U.S. Code Notes prev next (a) In Genera — (1) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR NATIONAL ORAGIN.—Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, yall, (A) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and (B) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this ttle, or both, it (0) death results from the offense; or (ii) the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual ‘abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill What is a 42 USC 1983 claim? The Civil Rights Act of 1874 is a federal statute, numbered 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that allows people to sue the government for civil rights violations. It applies when someone acting “under color of" state-level or local law has deprived a person of rights created by the U.S. Constitution or federal statutes. Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz - Page | 1442 U.S. Code § 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights U.S. Code Notes prev | next Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or Immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, the party injured in an action at law, sult in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable, For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. (R.S. §1979; Pub. L. 96-170, §1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104-317, title II, §309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat, 3853.) Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz- Page |1542 U.S. Code § 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights Us. cade Notes rw | net (2) Panvewrina corncan nan ranromsune oer "Wee or more parsons many Sate or Tartar cone to grat by fore, ntinidaton. a reat. any parson rom aecapting or elding “anyon, euat or place of confidence unde the Unned States. ot orm dchatging any dts erect: oo induce by le easy ‘ear olin Und States to lave any State, Gator place, shar his dues ae ofa ae required to be performed, ovata mn ina person or propery on acount of his anal cncharge ofthe dues of has ofice or hla engaged in the Inu hacharge threo oro ‘nur hit property 202819 molest. true, nde or pede min the dacharge of hi ofa es (2) Onerevcrin serie urinating ramry, Wes one Ite er more persons han Stata or Tory conte te deter by Fore tetiation or treat any party oF wines in any cour of the ‘Une States orm standing such cour orm tabling t any malar pending therein ely, hy ad uth ot Inne such party ‘rominers in hu sason oF property on sercunt cf ha hevng ao attended or tated orto inuence te verdict. oresertmart, ender St any grand or ptt ror in any auch cout orf jure such rer in ha person or propetty on account of any vera. presente. oF ‘naiaroant infu aertad toby im. or of he Being or having beam auth ret ofl ts ot mare persons conspire forthe purpose of ‘impeding. hindering, oberg, of defeating in an) mannas the ave couse ef fstn in any State ot Tarte. wth stat to deny Yo Any {lteen the equ protection of the ln, orto injure hin or hs proper fr indy eofrang. er atwnating to anfrc, the night! ary person, or Gaus of persone tothe agua potation ofthe lar (2) Deraewna rune or ars on rants Vw or mare person In any Sate se Teron entire of goin dagusa onthe highay oon the premises of anathr forthe ourpore of ‘or Terrory from ging ‘icunng ts parsons ohn auch Sata or Terry te aauelpatation ofthe ent oH ten or mere parsons conupie to paver by free, ‘nomsdaton. of Uwest any czen who ify ened to vote, fom ging hs suppor or advocacy na legal marine, toward oF Favor ‘Hie elacton fan lady qalied parson ot an lar for Eresidant or Ves Panter, eras s Hemar of Cangrece af he Unted Staten or oir ay izan in person ox prose an attOUN of auth Suppor nevcucy i ay cave of COMABracy #4 Or Oe sation. # eer mera eriane agape’ therein doo ause to be dene, any atin furhararce of dh cet suo conspiracy. wera ‘rother used m ha paraon or propa or deprived ot having and exasaeing ty gh or plage of» cin afte United Staten the bury so njred or depeved may hve an action forthe recovery of damages Suasaned by such nwt er dapriabion, again any ane 6 cms. 51900) Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz~ Page | 1642 U.S. Code § 1986. Action for neglect to prevent U.S. Code Notes, prev | next Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, ond ‘mentioned in section 1985 of this tite, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid In preventing the commission of the same, naglects or refuses so to do, If such \wrongful act be commited, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered In an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants In the action; and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefor, and may recover rot exceeding $5,000 damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, f there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased. But 10 action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which Is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued, (RS. §1981.) PRESS RELEASE U.S. Justice Department Launches Investigation of University of California Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Declaration of Margaret Bozgoz - Page | 17Phone: Email: Ema To: HR Representing handing Lance Fulgium’s From: Sender Lance Fulgium’s ADA Advocate case Col M. Sue Bozgoz, Sovereign/MOOR Fax: 925-755-5741, Pages: 17 Phone: Phone number Date: 1 May 2025 Re: ADA Advocate concern about illegal retaliation against Lance after being discriminated against Reason: ADA Accommodation and requested meeting under the 1990 ADA Act Priority: High ‘Comments: |am Lance's Mother and ADA Advocate. lam well aware how his co-worker made him feel on ‘or about 28 Feb 2025. | am more concerned about the outcome of the company's investigation. | need someone to help me understand the attached LAST WARNING. Please be advised that | am an ADA Advocate for too many wounded warriors to count and Lance's father was an Ethic’s attorney for the entire military. We currently have an open lawsuit against the United States Inc. Do we need to include this company too? Lance loves his work, but he cannot be discriminated against openly! You can see our work at: https://www. bitchute.com/channe|/WTXWnbI8YhXG Lance has asked me to be kind to the company. My intent is not to cause any issues. | just want you to be warned that this is your warning to stop setting Lance up as we have evaluated this situation and talk to A M.Ste ers g-— Lance's ADA Advocate, Sovereign/MOOR ‘410-858-0107 adaadvocatesuebozgoz@ gmail.com