Pinktax Apricediscriminationwithunfortunatefemales
Pinktax Apricediscriminationwithunfortunatefemales
Neha Barari
Assistant Professor Sharda University, Email; [email protected].
Ritu Makhija*
*Assistant Professor Sharda University, Email; [email protected]
Madhvi Sharma
Senior Tutor, Sharda University, Email; [email protected]
Amrita A. Sivasanker
Associate professor, Sharda University, Email; [email protected]
ABSTRACT:
The pink tax affects more than just the price of a single item; it affects more than just an additional
expense. Low-income women are particularly burdened by this charge since it forces them to make
decisions between buying necessities and taking care of other fundamental requirements. Because
of this, it may become more challenging for these women to pay for additional needs like housing,
medical care, and even food. This may feed a never-ending cycle of inequality and
impoverishment. The pink tax has a tendency to widen economic disparities among males and
females outside of the consumer market. Numerous nations have previously done away with their
taxes on feminine hygiene products, such as Kenya, Australia, and India. Except in a few US states,
there aren't many official regulations or rules pertaining to the pink tax. Businesses must embrace
open pricing practices and accept responsibility for their activities. The pink tax will be eliminated,
which will advance gender equality.
Keywords: - Pink, Tax, discrimination, females.
INTRODUCTION
One of the famous French writer sheds lights on the heavy burden that taxes place on citizens of
any nation. In order to bolster this assertion, Henry Hezlitt, a well-known Wall Street Journal
business and economic journalist, contends that an increase in taxes weakens wealth accumulation,
hinders manufacturing, and produces problems in addition to weakening individual drive to grow
From a historical perspective, it is evident that the Arthashashtra and Manu smriti treatises are
where the contemporary system of direct and indirect taxation in India originated. The initial
Income Tax Act was passed in 1860 by Sir James Wilson, India's first finance minister, and this
system was finally put into practise. The government also makes sure that its citizens are safe and
secure by bolstering the police and military. Additionally, it supports important government
operations like municipal and council activities, among others. It is obvious that the taxes levied
on taxpayers are wisely invested in the greater interest of society when viewed logically.
Over time, the goal of taxation has undergone a significant evolution. The pink tax is an emerging
trend that has drawn a lot of attention in recent years, yet it represents a persistent issue that affects
women everywhere in the entire globe. The troublesome cost disparity that females experience
when acquiring items and amenities that are identical to those promoted to men is referred to as
the "pink tax."
For many reasons, the widespread phenomena known as the "pink tax" demands our attention. To
begin with, it is an instance of subtly discriminatory gender dynamics that upholds antiquated
gender roles and exacerbates disparities in gender. Women are frequently required to pay more for
goods and services that are specifically targeted to them because of their gender, despite already
experiencing uneven pay in numerous regions of the world.
There have been instances of gender-based pricing discrepancies throughout history for a very
long time. For instance, in the early 20th century, despite the fact that the clothing was made of
the same materials, dry cleaners charged women extra to clean their shirts.
The rate of impoverishment among working women would have been lowered in half, according
to research, if women were paid equally to males of their status. However, it is the fact that
females frequently spend far more than males for similar products and services. Cloths, detergents,
toys in pink colour and dry washing are just a few examples of often advertised goods and services
that are frequently more expensive for females than they are for males. There is ample evidence
that there are large pricing discrepancies for nearly identical products, despite claims by
manufacturers and retailers that the price difference is the result of increased costs for making
women's products or offering services to women.
Despite its brief existence, the pink tax is a deeply ingrained problem that is related to larger social
and economic inequities that continue to harm women in various ways. This inequitable and
prejudiced approach to the cost isn't limited to a specific industry or region, and it has been
observed in nations all over the world, including India. The pink tax may also be affected by gender
conventions and societal expectations. Items for cleaning and personal care products may be in
higher demand because women tend to expect to take on more domestic and caring duties.
Companies may benefit from this by raising the price of products geared towards women.
The pink tax may have a number of negative effects on people and society. Women's buying
authority and availability to necessary goods, for instance, may be restricted. Additionally, it might
promote unfavourable gender stereotypes and result in economic inequalities. Therefore, tackling
the pink tax is essential if we are to promote gender equality and build a more just society. Despite
increased knowledge of the pink tax in the past few years, the pink tax is still widely used in India.
There is still gender-based price differences in several consumer goods categories. In families with
few resources, where females are regularly required to choose between purchasing necessities and
taking care of other fundamental requirements, the situation is especially urgent.
Gender," which aimed to increase public awareness of the unfair pricing practises practised in the
beauty industry. In a video that was part of the campaign, women criticised the pink tax and argued
in favour of gender-neutral pricing. As part of the campaign, 2,000 Indian women were polled,
and the findings showed that 87% of the respondents had encountered price discrimination based
on gender while looking for personal care items. 74% of respondents to the poll said they were
willing to move to an organisation that provided neutral regarding gender pricing. Sugar Cosmetics
has promised to set prices for all of its products that are gender-neutral, and Vineeta Singh, the co-
founder of the business, has challenged other cosmetic firms to do the same.
The pink tax has gained traction in India in recent years as legislators and consumer advocacy
organisations press for action to eliminate gender-based pricing disparities. The pink tax is,
however, mostly unregulated in India because there is no explicit regulation governing it.
India's 2019 Consumer Protection Act is a significant piece of legislation that safeguards
customers against dishonest business practises. Buyers have little legal recourse because the Act,
on the other hand, makes no mention of according to gender pricing inequalities. Beyond product
price disparities, the pink tax issue also involves the persistence of stereotypes about gender and
structural discrimination. In order to achieve financial and social equity as Indian culture moves
closer to gender equality, the pink tax must be addressed. According to Nobel laureate Amartya
Sen, "equality between men and women is not a women's issue; it is a human issue."
The pink tax problem extends beyond differences in product prices to include the continuation of
gender stereotypes and structural discrimination. As Indian culture evolves towards gender
equality, the pink tax needs to be addressed in order to attain financial and social parity. The Nobel
Prize winner Amartya Sen asserts that "equality between men and women is not a women's issue;
it is a human issue." Amartya Sen, a Nobel laureate, famously said. The pink tax not only harms
the financial security of women, but it also upholds damaging ideologies and archaic gender
stereotypes. The government and the private sector both have a role in resolving this issue.
Government must create laws and regulations to prevent gender-based pricing discrepancies, while
businesses must actively work to eliminate gender stereotypes and promote gender equality.
METHODS
A narrative review was designed. A systematic electronic search was used to identify relevant
studies. Only original research papers were used in the study. The electronic databases searched
were: Research gate, PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar and Allied Health Literature (CINHAL).
The existing literatures were very systematically opted to recruit into this narrative review.
Inclusion criteria
1. Original research papers related to the topic.
2. The document which is available in full text and is widely accessible online.
3. Studies that are presented in English.
4. Research studies published from the year 2018 onwards.
Exclusion criteria
1) Poor quality journal articles.
2) A research articles without having ISSN number.
3) Research studies that are not listed in a journal data base.
4) Research studies for which there is an abstract accessible.
OUTCOME
KNOWLEDGE REGARDING PINK TAX
1. Kardetoft M has conducted a research study titled “The Pink Tax” An investigation of gender-
based price discrimination in the Swedish market for personal 12hygiene products. The primary
goals of this research were to evaluate the phenomena known as the pink tax. The topic was
rigorously examined in markets such as the United States and the United Kingdom, where
evidence of a pink tax has been discovered. As a result, women tend to spend more for the
identical goods than males, even when the only difference appears to be packaging and/or
aroma. The product samples were divided into five categories: razor blades, razors, shaving
cream, deodorant, and soap. The samples were collected by hand from 16 separate locations in
CONCLUSION
Pink tax is a common practice in both service and product industries, including dry cleaning,
transportation, and personal care and apparel. There's no exception when it comes to things for
kids, from toys and stationery to clothes and accessories. Gender-based product and service
marketing, particularly when it comes to package changes, is responsible for the pink tax.
Frequently, similar products that don't need to be differentiated to match a specific gender are also
categorized according to gender in order to benefit the seller from the additional money paid
(known as the "pink tax") for the more expensive product. Businesses have taken action to end the
pink tax and educate more consumers about it after realizing how discriminatory it is in recent
years.
Publicly highlighting instances of goods and services provided by businesses that impose the pink
tax is a crucial component of the pink tax awareness campaign. Customers of these businesses are
more likely to seek justice and support the pink tax revolution when they become aware of the
gender-based price discrimination that they were victims of. The tax paid on menstruation
products, or the "tampon tax," is always brought up in discussions concerning the pink tax. The
REFERENCES
1. Duesterhaus, M. et al. (2011) “The cost of doing femininity: Gendered disparities in pricing
of personal care products and services,” Gender issues, 28(4), pp. 175–191. doi:
10.1007/s12147-011-9106-3.
2. Legally Flawless (2023) Pink tax: An examination of gender-based pricing disparities and
implications for women’s economic, Legally Flawless. Available at:
https://legallyflawless.in/ pink-tax-examination-gender-pricing-disparities-implications-
womens-economic-equality/ (Accessed: November 4, 2023).
3. Article, T. (no date) Un Pinking Discrimination: Exploring the Pink Tax and its
Implications, Ijpsl.in. Available at: https://ijpsl.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/UnPinking-
Discrimination_-Exploring-the-Pink-Tax-and-its-Implications.pdf (Accessed: November 4,
2023).
4. Barnes, K. and Brounstein, J. (2022) “The pink tax: Why do women pay more?” SSRN
Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4269217.
5. Saxena, R. (no date) A legal study of the applicability of pink tax in India, Ijcrt.org. Available
at: https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2208172.pdf (Accessed: November 4, 2023).