unit-7-vijayanagar-empire
unit-7-vijayanagar-empire
Political Formations
Unit 7 EVOLUTIONOF INSTITUTIONS:
KINGSHIP AND THE NAYAKA
SYSTEM*
Structure
7.0 Objectives
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Nature of the Vijaynagara State
7.3 Local Administration under the Vijaynagara Empire
7.3.1 The Nayankara System
7.3.2 The Ayagar System
7.4 Economy of the Vijaynagara Empire
7.4.1 Land and Income Rights
7.4.2 Economic Role of Temples
7.4.3 Foreign Trade
7.4.4 Internal Trade and Urban Life
7.5 Society
7.6 Summary
7.7 Keywords
7.8 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
7.9 Suggested Readings
7.10 Instructional Video Recommendations
7.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this Unit, you should be able to:
• construe the nature of the Vijayanagara state,
• understand the administrative set-up with special reference to nayankara and
ayagar system,
• evaluate the economy of the Vijayanagara empire.
• analyze the foreign and internal trade and mercantile activities, and
• appraise the social structure of the Vijayanagara empire.
7.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous Unit, we discussed the process of the emergence, expansion and
consolidation of the Vijaynagara power in the South Indian macro-region. In the
present Unit our focus would be to analyse various approaches pertaining to the
nature of the Vijayanagara state, its various institutions, economy and society.
* Dr. Sangeeta Pandey, School of Social Sciences, Indira Gandhi National Open University,
New Delhi. The present Unit is taken from Indria Gandhi National Open University, New
140 Delhi. Course EHI-03: India from 8th to 15th Century, Block 7, Units 27.
Evolution of Institutions:
7.2 NATURE OF THE VIJAYNAGARA STATE1 Kingship and the
Nayaka System
There are various approaches – feudal, segmentary and integrative – with respect
to evaluating the Indian polity. Let us analyze the nature of the Vijaynagara polity
within this model.
Segmentary State
Burton Stein regards the Vijaynagara state as a segmentary state. For him, in the
Vijaynagara state, absolute political sovereignty rested with the centre, but in the
periphery ‘ritual sovereignty’ (symbolic control) was in the hands of the nayakas
and the Brahman commanders. The relationship of these subordinate units –
segments – in relation to the central authority was pyramidally arranged. The more
far removed a segment was from the centre, the greater its capacity to change
loyalty from one power pyramid to another.
Feudal Model
Some scholars try to explain the character of the Vijaynagara state in the backdrop
of feudal structure. They argue that the practice of giving fresh land grants to
Brahmans was an important factor which led to the rise of feudal segments. The
frequency of such land grants enhanced the position of the Brahmans. As a result,
they enjoyed a large measure of autonomy, possessed administrative powers and
controlled revenue resources within their settlements. Scholars further argue that
since the rulers of Vijaynagara proposed to protect Hindu dharma, it led to the
emergence of new Brahman settlements.
Further, the military need to expand into Tamil region created feudal territories
under the control of amaranayakas (warriors) and other high officials.
Amaranayakas were hereditary holders of land. They paid tribute and rendered
military service to the king (like the samantas of north India).
The vassals in turn started giving land grants to their subordinates, thus giving
way to sub-infeudation. The large extent of the empire and the absence of adequate
means of transport and communication made it necessary for the rulers to entrust
power to these feudal segments for the governance of the empire. In the process of
conquest and consolidation, recalcitrant chieftains were subdued and their territory
distributed among new chiefs. Nevertheless, some old chiefs were also permitted
to continue in the new scheme.
Other Interpretations
N.K. Sastri sees the Vijaynagara state in the light of essentially a Hindu kingdom
performing the ideological (religio-political) role of the defender of Hindu culture
against the Muslims of the Bahmani kingdom and its successor states. From this
stems the theory of the militaristic character of the Vijaynagara state. For him, the
Vijaynagara state was a ‘war’ state.
1
This section is taken from IGNOU Course EHI-03: India from 8th to 15th century, p. 63. 141
Political Formations sabha and ur (village assemblies) did not completely disappear when the nayaka
and ayagar systems came into prominence.
grant was utilised properly. The income from devadana villages provided sustenance Evolution of Institutions:
Kingship and the
to the ritual functionaries. It was also utilised to provide food offerings or to purchase
Nayaka System
goods (mostly aromatic substances and cloth) essential for carrying out the ritual
rites. Cash endowments were also made by the state to the temples for providing
ritual service.
Temples took up irrigational work also. Large temples holding devadana lands
had under them irrigation department for properly channelising money grants made
to the temples. Those who gave cash grants to temples also received a share of the
food offering (prasadam) derived from the increased productivity.
In fact, temples in South India were important centres of economic activity. They
were not only great landholders but they also carried on banking activities. They
employed a number of persons. Mahalingam refers to an inscription which mentions
a temple which employed 370 servants. Temples purchased local goods for
performance of ritual services. They gave loans to individuals and village assemblies
for economic purposes. The loans were given against lands whose income went to
the temples. Cash endowments made by the state to the Tirupati temple were
ploughed back in irrigation. The income thus attained was used to carry out and
maintain ritual services. At Srirangam temple, cash grants were used to advance
commercial loans to business firms in Trichnopoly. Temples had their trusts which
utilised its funds for various purposes. Thus, the temples functioned almost as an
independent economic system encompassing persons and institutions that were
bound together by economic links.
7.5 SOCIETY
The social structure of the South Indian macro-region (Vijaynagara empire) is a
unique variant of the Indian society. The uniqueness of the social structure was
three-fold:
• secular functions of the South Indian Brahmans
• dual division of lower social groups
• territorial segmentation of the society
The Brahmans lived in localities where they controlled land, and their prestige
and power was also derived from their control over those dependent on land. They
also enjoyed prestige due to their sacral functions as a priestly class. The emergence
of a large number of Vedic temples endowed with villages (devadanas) gave the
Brahmans as temple functionaries the power to exercise ritual control over all
other castes and religious institutions. As managers of these religious centres, the
Brahmans enjoyed great secular authority.
146 Territorial segmentation of society implies that social groups in the Tamil country.
were divided on the basis of natural sub-region and occupational patterns associated Evolution of Institutions:
with them. Social groups in South India had less interaction with groups at some Kingship and the
Nayaka System
distance from their locality. They gave preference to cross-cousin and maternal
uncle-niece marriages.
Another characteristic of the social structure was the dual division of lower castes
referred to by the right hand (valangai) and left-hand (idangai) designations
(Vaishnavas corresponding to the right hand division and the Saivites corresponding
to the left hand castes). In most cases, the right-hand castes were involved primarily
in agricultural production and local trade in agricultural commodities whereas
left-hand castes were engaged in mobile artisan production and extensive trade in
non-agricultural products.
During the Vijaynagara period, the peasant was the basis of the social order on
whom all other sections of the society depended. The satkams, the Tamil poetic
genre, regard the leading peasantry as pure sat-sudras. They claimed ritual purity
and respectable secular rank for them.
Temples played an important role in delineating or determining social space of
groupings who were the participants in the worship of a particular deity. An
important characteristic of lineage in the South Indian kingship is marked by the
common devotion to the lineage tutelary. The non-Brahman priests of the peasants’
tutelary shrines (e.g. amman) also participated in the management of great shrines
of Siva and Vishnu where the Brahman priests predominated. The matha, the seat
of sectarian organisation located at great shrines, consisted of persons of both the
Brahman and non-Brahman orders. Thus, the social organisation of this period
comprised of the Brahmans, the left and right-hand castes which included
respectable agricultural castes, namely Vellals and lower castes like the weavers.
Check Your Progress-2
1) Write a note on the nature of land tenure in the Vijaynagara empire.
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
2) Discuss the economic role of temples in the Vijaynagara empire.
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
3) Describe the development of trade and commerce under the Vijaynagara rulers
with special reference to foreign trade.
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
4) Define the left hand and right hand castes.
.........................................................................................................................
147
7.6 SUMMARY
Historians have variously looked at the two major political institutions the
nayankara and ayagar systems which were the backbone of the Vijaynagara power.
Temples were not only the religious centres but also important centres of economic
activity: they performed banking activities and used to undertake irrigational works,
etc. Trade and commerce was in a flourishing state. But, the role of the Indian
merchants in the overseas trade was minimal instead Muslim merchants enjoyed
the monopoly.
7.7 KEYWORDS
Amaram Villages assigned to the local military
chiefs
Bhandaravada Crown villages
Devadanas Villages assigned to the temples
Dasavanda and Kattu-Kodage Income from irrigational investments
Manya tax-free land given to the village function-
aries, Brahmans, temples and mathas
Nadu Peasant assembly or organization
Nayak Warrior chief
Sabha Brahmana assembly
Sastri, Nilakanta, (1958) A History of South India: From Prehistoric Times to the Evolution of Institutions:
fall of Vijaynagara (London: Oxford University Press). Kingship and the
Nayaka System
Stein, Burton, (1999) Peasant State and Society in Medieval South India (Delhi:
Oxford University Press).
Stein, Burton, (1989) The New Cambridge History of India, Vijayanagara: 2
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
149