Hypothetical Learning Trajectory and Video Program with Differentiated Multi-Language in Teaching Mathematics 9
Hypothetical Learning Trajectory and Video Program with Differentiated Multi-Language in Teaching Mathematics 9
Abstract: This study investigated the effectiveness of video-based instruction in enhancing students’ academic achievement
in Mathematics. Specifically, it evaluated the quality of the developed instructional videos in terms of relevance to the
curriculum, organization and structure, instructional quality, and cultural formation. A quasi-experimental research design
was employed, involving eighty-eight Grade Nine students from Gapok National High School, divided equally into control
and experimental groups. The experimental group received instruction using video-based learning materials with
differentiated multi-language, while the control group was taught using conventional methods. Pretest and posttest
assessments were conducted to measure student achievement, and a Pearson correlation analysis was performed to
determine whether students’ perceived ratings of the video materials influenced their academic performance.
Findings revealed that both jurors and respondents rated the video materials highly across all quality indicators,
suggesting their effectiveness as instructional tools. The posttest results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement
in the experimental group compared to the control group. The analysis of gain scores further supported this finding,
confirming the positive impact of video-based instruction on student learning. However, the Pearson correlation analysis
revealed a very weak and non-significant relationship between perceived video quality and posttest scores, indicating that
students’ perceptions of instructional materials did not significantly influence their actual academic performance.
The study concludes that video-based instruction is an effective pedagogical tool for improving student achievement in
Mathematics. It recommends the integration of instructional videos into mathematics teaching and suggests further research
on long-term learning effects, student engagement factors, and the applicability of video-based instruction across different
subject areas.
Keywords: Video Based Instruction, Differentiated Multi Language, Hypothetical Learning Trajectory, Mathematics Education,
Student Academic Achievement.
How to Cite: Reymart C. Tonducan; Reynaldo H. Dalayap Jr. (2025), Hypothetical Learning Trajectory and Video Program with
Differentiated Multi-Language in Teaching Mathematics 9. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology,
10(4), 2061-2072. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr1228
Moreover,Rukayah et al. (2022) cited the integration of Samosaet al. (2021) stress that using video as a
technology in learning to create effectiveness and technology-based tool resulted in a more engaging and
independence in learning anytime and anywhere as enjoyable method of learning fractions. They also
characteristics of 21st-century learning from the study of emphasized that using Video-based instructional material
(Barak et al., 2016; Simonson et al., 2019; Tican& Deniz, encouraged students to interact and participate socially in
2019). Mathematics sessions. Learners are motivated to participate
actively in Mathematics lectures that are entertaining and
Rukayah et al. (2022) also emphasized that instructors fascinating, according to the findings of this study.
and learners needed technology-based learning media that
could utilize the principle of combining the power of Filipino and Other Local Languages in Teaching
traditional face-to-face learning and online learning. Mathematics
Interactive multimedia was supported by various types of Teaching Mathematics in different languages
media involved in learning to increase student interest and considering the local where the learners belong is
meet different learning styles. advantageous because they may be able to cope with the
standard. They may understand the lesson differently, for
He also added that media interactivity supported the they can relate to it. Furthermore, the learners are allowed to
strengthening of two-way interaction in the learning process create new learnings in their language.
so that it was expected to increase the acquisition of language
skills, both receptive and productive. Shuukwanyamaet al. (2022) cited the study of Nkonde
et al. (2018), which has the findings that when the Mother
Video Program and Its Implication to Teaching and Tongueis used in teaching mathematics, teachers can handle
Learning explaining mathematical concepts.
It has been long since video clips were used for teaching
and learning. Many researchers have argued that video clips Learners recalled effortlessly what they were
are useful as a source of ideas in learning the different subject taught.Stated also in the 1987 Philippine Constitution, Article
areas in education. XIV, Sec. 7 that the official languages of the Philippines are
Filipino and, until otherwise provided by law, English.
Shevell et al. (2014) stated that the students found that
the video clips displayed this educational content in an The regional languages are official languages in the
interesting, entertaining, and engaging manner. Furthermore, regions and shall serve as auxiliary media of instruction.
they believed this method of presentation is effective in Furthermore, the Philippine RA 10533 of 2012 that teachers
transmitting knowledge and communicating information. will utilize students’ mother tongue as a learning resource.
Video clips would appeal to recent cohorts of medical Thus, the learners are privileged to act and talk in their native
trainees. They also added that the video clips encourage language, especially in Mathematics.
reflection and critical thinking.
Shuukwanyama(2022) stated that although support for
Moreover, according to Ghilay(2021), Video-Based using native languages in Mathematics education is prevalent
Learning (VBL) is a method in which a course syllabus is in research, Philippine texts are still in English. It will support
fully covered by video clips, either as a replacement for or as learners who need help understanding English as a pure
a supplement to live lectures. instruction medium.
Mother tongue instruction thus supports a learner- The video clips developed were done using Microsoft
centered approach for both preservice teachers and, 365’s PowerPoint. The video clips will be evaluated by five
ultimately, their learners as they actively participate during (5) Mathematics teachers who have finished their master’s
the lessons. There should be a proper evaluation of the word degree in mathematics and the forty four (44) target
equivalence of mathematics terms to avoid bias and mistakes respondents in the experimental group..
in delivering the teaching and learning process.
The video clips were evaluated to determine their
Mother Tongue may be the most convenient language relevance to the curriculum, organization and structure,
to convey comprehensive information to everyone in instructional quality, cultural formation through the
Philippine settings. It may also be useful in teaching descriptive-evaluative design. The Inter-Rater Reliability
Mathematics. Analysis Using Fleiss’ Kappa was used to measure the level
of agreement among multiple raters when assigning
Learning Trajectory and Video Program with categorical ratings. The computed Fleiss’ Kappa value is
Differentiated Multi-language in Teaching and Learning. 0.8711, which falls under the "Almost Perfect Agreement"
category based on standard interpretation guidelines (Landis
The teacher who is first witting on the learning & Koch, 1977). It indicated that the evaluators demonstrated
trajectory of the learners may intelligently design tasks that a high degree of consistency in their ratings. Thus the strong
fit to cope with the learner's needs in terms of learning. inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.8711) confirms that the
evaluation instrument is highly reliable for assessing the
Moreover, as supported by many researchers, the video given criteria
program is useful in addressing learners in developing their
problem-solving skills. Ozleret al. (2021) found that video The output of the experimental group depended on the
modeling effectively teaches computer skills to students, strategies of the researcher considering the students’ learning
even those with intellectual disabilities. Video modeling trajectory with developed video clips. Also, the result of the
could be applied more broadly. control group was depended on the strategies to be employed
by the researcher.
However, a video program with the use of multi-
language instruction may be helpful to introduce the learners Locale of the Study
in Mathematics 9, for they will fully understand the language This study was conducted at Gapok National High
used, and even they may be able to make meaning to the School, located in the rural and mountainous barangay of
lessons being discussed. Gapok in Senator Ninoy Aquino, Sultan Kudarat. Gapok is
considered as one of the rural areas in Sultan Kudarat which
Thus, incorporating the video program with often faces challenges that hinder effective teaching and
differentiated multi-language teaching as strategies to be learning. Moreover, Bernardo (2020) stated in his study that
used in teaching and learning considering the learners' rural schools in the Philippines commonly deal with issues
learning trajectory will help in developing the learners' such as limited access to resources, underdeveloped
problem-solving skills. educational infrastructure, and minimal exposure to
innovative teaching strategies. These challenges can
III. METHODOLOGY negatively impact students’ learning experiences, problem-
solving skills, which are crucial for academic success and
This chapter showed the research design, the study's lifelong learning (Llanes &Totio, 2021).
locale, the study's respondents, sampling size and sampling
technique, data gathering instruments, the research The use of differentiated instruction, specifically
procedure, and the statistical treatment for this study. through video-based learning, has been shown to enhance
student engagement and improve learning outcomes.
Research Design Tomlison (2017) emphasized that differentiated teaching
Quasi-experimental research design, specifically the addresses the diverse needs of learners by tailoring
pretest and posttest design was used to conduct this study. instruction to their readiness levels, interests, and learning
Pretest manners were employed in both the control and profiles. Moreover, incorporating technology, such as videos
experimental groups. in multi-languages, fosters contextualized and accessible
learning, which is particularly beneficial in rural settings
The result of the pretest was used to determine the where cultural and linguistic diversity is present (Bautista &
Learning Trajectory of the learners in the experimental group Maravilla, 2019).
and the posttest manner was employed in the experimental
The HLT-VPDML was used as a source of and the respondents of the study were guided by the five-
Mathematical Information and served as a strategy for the point Likert Scale type questionnaire with corresponding
researcher in conducting the study. An evaluation instrument interpretation to determine quality level of the video clips
employed was modified and adapted from the study of based on its relevance to the curriculum, organization and
(Cajandig and Lumibao, 2020). The jurors (Math experts) structure, instructional quality, and cultural formation.
IJISRT25APR1228 www.ijisrt.com 3
2066
Volume 10, Issue 4, April – 2025 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr1228
Statistical Treatment In problem 5: Is there a significant difference in the
Problem1: What is the level of the developed video mean gain score of the control and experimental group?
clips presentations based on the perceptions of the jurors and
target users in terms of relevance to the curriculum, A t-test for two independent scores was applied to
organization and structure, instructional quality, and cultural determine if the posttest of the control group and
formation? experimental groups' posttest has a significant difference.
In analyzing the problem 1, the mean and standard Problem 6. Is there significant difference in the mean
deviation were used to determine the level of quality of the gain score of the control and experimental group?
developed video clips in terms of their relevance to the
curriculum, organization and structure, instructional quality, To solve this problem, mean was employed to
and cultural formation. determine the mean gain scores of the control and
experimental group. T-test also used to determine the
Problem 2: What is the level of achievement in pretest significant difference in the mean gain scores of the control
of the Grade 9 students in the control and experimental and experimental groups.
group?
Problem 7. Is the posttest score of the experimental
This also used the mean and standard deviation to group significantly influenced by their perceived rating on
determine the achievement of the control and experimental the quality of the materials?
groups in the pretest on the activities designed.
To address this problem, Correlation Pearson (r) will be
Problem 3: What is level of achievement in posttest of employed to assess the relationship between the perceived
Grade 9 students in the control and experimental group? rating on the quality of the materials (independent variable)
and the posttest scores (dependent variable). This analysis
This also used the mean and standard deviation to determined whether the perceived quality ratings
determine the level of achievement of the control and significantly influence the posttest scores of the experimental
experimental group in the post-test. group.
Table 3 The Perceived Quality of the Developed Video Clip Presentations by Jurors and Target Users in Terms of Their
Relevance to the Curriculum.
Group n Mean SD Verbal Description
Jurors 5 4.55 0.17 Outstanding
Respondents 44 4.76 0.02 Outstanding
The results in Table 3 indicate that jurors rated the video well-structured audiovisual materials in enhancing student
materials as M = 4.55, SD = 0.17, while respondents provided comprehension. Given these results, the null hypothesis (Ho ),
a slightly higher rating of M = 4.76, SD = 0.02, both which stated that the developed video clips are not
classified as "Outstanding." The minimal standard deviation significantly relevant to the curriculum, is rejected. This
values suggest a high level of Cognitive Theory of confirms that the video clips are indeed relevant to the
Multimedia Learning, agreement among evaluators. These curriculum and align effectively with instructional goals.
results support Mayer’s (2021) which emphasize the role of
Table 4 The Perceived Quality of the Developed Video Clip Presentations in Terms of Organization and Structure, as Evaluated
by Jurors and Target Users.
Group n Mean SD Verbal Description
Jurors 5 4.60 0.21 Outstanding
Respondents 44 4.93 0.06 Outstanding
The Table 4 data revealed that the developed video SD = 0.06, both categorized as "Outstanding." The small
materials were highly rated for organization and structure. standard deviations indicate a strong consensus among
Jurors rated the materials at M = 4.60, SD = 0.21, while evaluators. These findings align with Mayer’s (2021)
respondents provided an even higher rating of M = 4.93, research on multimedia learning, which highlights the
Table 5 The Perceived Quality of the Developed Video Clip Presentations in Terms of Instructional Effectiveness, as Evaluated
by Jurors and Target Users.
Group n Mean SD Verbal Description
Jurors 5 4.55 0.17 Outstanding
Respondents 44 4.76 0.02 Outstanding
The instructional quality of the developed video clips Learning supports this, highlighting that the combination of
was highly rated by both jurors and student respondents, as visuals and narration fosters deeper comprehension and
shown in Table 5. Jurors assigned a rating of M = 4.57, SD = engagement. Based on the strong ratings, the null
0.18, while respondents provided a perfect score of M = 5.00, hypothesis (H₀), which states that the developed video clips
SD = 0.00, classifying the materials as "Outstanding." The do not significantly enhance instructional quality, is rejected.
unanimous agreement among respondents suggests a strong This confirms that the instructional materials are effective
perception of the videos’ effectiveness in supporting and contribute positively to the learning process.
learning. Mayer’s (2021) Cognitive Theory of Multimedia
Table 6 The Perceived Quality of the Developed Video Clips Presentation Based on the Perception of Jurors and Target Users in
Terms of Cultural Formation.
Group n Mean SD Verbal Description
Jurors 5 4.68 0.13 Outstanding
Respondents 44 4.90 0.12 Outstanding
As presented in Table 6, the developed video clips were integrating cultural identity into educational materials.
highly rated in terms of cultural formation, with jurors Consequently, the null hypothesis (H₀), which posits that the
providing a mean rating of M = 4.68, SD = 0.13, and developed video clips do not significantly incorporate
respondents assigning an even higher score of M = 4.90, SD cultural formation, is rejected. This finding confirms that the
= 0.12, both classified as "Outstanding." The minimal instructional videos successfully integrate diverse cultural
variability in scores indicates a strong level of agreement. perspectives, making them more relatable and inclusive for
These results align with Ladson-Billings’ (1995) Culturally students.
Relevant Pedagogy, which underscores the importance of
Table 7 Summary of the Perceived Quality of the Developed Video Clips Based on Evaluations from Jurors and Target Users.
Group n Mean SD Verbal Description
Jurors 5 4.90 0.01 Outstanding
Respondents 44 4.59 0.03 Outstanding
Table 7 summarizes the overall perceived quality of the engaging digital materials improve student learning
developed video materials. The jurors provided a near-perfect outcomes. Based on the consistently high ratings, the null
score of M = 4.90, SD = 0.01, while respondents rated the hypothesis (H₀), which states that the overall perceived
materials at M = 4.59, SD = 0.03, both classified as quality of the developed video clips is not significantly high,
"Outstanding." The strong level of agreement among is rejected. This confirms that the video materials were of
evaluators suggests that the instructional materials were excellent quality and well-received by both experts and
perceived as highly effective. Mayer’s (2021) Multimedia learners.
Learning Theory highlights how well-structured and
Table 8 The Level of Achievement in Pretest of the Grade 9 Students in the Control and Experimental Group.
Group n Mean SD Verbal Description
Control 44 11.05 2.74 Beginning
Experimental 44 10. 68 2.36 Beginning
The pretest scores in Table 8 reveal that the control comparisons of posttest results (Creswell & Creswell, 2018).
group achieved a mean score of M = 11.05, SD = 2.74, while As the difference in pretest scores was small, the null
the experimental group recorded a slightly lower mean of M hypothesis (H₀), which states that there is no significant
= 10.68, SD = 2.36. The similar mean scores suggest that both difference in pretest scores between the control and
groups had comparable levels of mathematical proficiency experimental groups, is retained. This confirms that both
before the intervention. This finding supports experimental groups started at a comparable level, allowing for a fair
research principles that emphasize the need for equivalent assessment of the intervention’s impact.
baseline knowledge between groups to ensure valid
The posttest results presented in Table 9 indicate a (2021) Multimedia Learning Theory, the combination of
notable improvement in achievement scores. The control visual and auditory instructional materials enhances student
group obtained a mean score of M = 17.89, SD = 2.45, comprehension and retention. Given the higher posttest
whereas the experimental group achieved a significantly scores in the experimental group, the null hypothesis (H₀),
higher mean score of M = 21.46, SD = 3.00. These findings which states that there is no significant difference in posttest
suggest that students who received video-based, multi- achievement between the control and experimental groups, is
language instruction demonstrated greater learning gains rejected. This confirms that the intervention had a positive
compared to those in the control group. According to Mayer’s effect on students' academic performance.
Table 10 Comparison of Students’ Pretest Achievement Between the Control and Experimental Groups.
Group n Mean SD df t-value p-value
Control 44 11.05 2.74 86 0.67 0.51
Experimental 44 10.68 2.36
α = 0.05 level of significance.
Table 10 presents the results of an independent samples hypothesis (H₀), which posits that there is no significant
t-test comparing the pretest scores of the control and difference in pretest achievement between the control and
experimental groups. The control group had a mean score of experimental groups, is retained. This finding confirms that
M = 11.05, SD = 2.74, while the experimental group recorded both groups started with equivalent levels of mathematical
a similar mean of M = 10.68, SD = 2.36. The statistical proficiency, ensuring that any differences observed in
analysis yielded t(86) = 0.67, p = 0.51, indicating that the posttest results were likely due to the intervention rather than
difference between the groups was not statistically pre-existing disparities (Creswell & Creswell, 2018).
significant. Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null
Table 11 Significant Difference in Students’ Level of Achievement in the Posttest Between Control and Experimental Group.
Group n Mean SD df t-value p-value
Control 44 17.89 2.45 86 0.27 0.00
Experimental 44 21. 46 3.00
α = 0.05 level of significance.
The comparison of posttest scores between the control suggests that reducing extraneous cognitive load through
and experimental groups in Table 11 reveals a significant structured multimedia instruction enhances learning
improvement in the experimental group. The control group outcomes. Given that the experimental group outperformed
obtained a posttest mean score of M = 17.89, SD = 2.45, the control group, the null hypothesis (H₀), which asserted
while the experimental group achieved a notably higher score that there is no significant difference in posttest achievement
of M = 21.46, SD = 3.00. The independent samples t-test between the control and experimental groups, is rejected.
produced t(86) = 0.27, p = 0.00, confirming a statistically This indicates that the intervention was effective in
significant difference at the 0.05 level. These findings improving student learning.
support Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller, 1988), which
Table 12 Significant Difference in the student’s in the main gain score of the control and experimental Group.
Group n Mean Gain Score df t-value p-value
Control 44 10.77 86 5.16 <0.001
Experimental 44 6.84
α = 0.05 level of significance.
The results in Table 12 highlight the comparison of study. This finding challenges some of the expectations
mean gain scores between the two groups. The control group regarding video-assisted learning and suggests the need for
had a mean gain score of M = 10.77, SD = 11.579, whereas refinements in its implementation (Tabachnick & Fidell,
the experimental group exhibited a lower mean gain of M = 2019). As the p-value is below 0.05, the null hypothesis (H₀),
6.84, SD = 13.90. The independent samples t-test yielded which states that there is no significant difference in the mean
t(86) = 5.16, p < 0.001, indicating a statistically significant gain score between the control and experimental groups, is
difference in learning gains. The control group’s greater rejected. This confirms that the difference in learning gains
improvement suggests that traditional instructional methods was significant.
may have had a more substantial effect on learning in this
Table 13 presents the Pearson correlation results the video materials' quality did not significantly influence
examining the relationship between students’ perceived their actual academic performance.
ratings of video quality and their posttest scores. The
correlation analysis yielded r(42) = 0.04, p = 0.79, indicating VI. CONCLUSION
a very weak and non-significant relationship. Since the p-
value is greater than 0.05, there is insufficient evidence to The developed video materials were highly relevant to the
conclude that perceived video quality significantly curriculum, as indicated by the positive evaluations from
influenced student performance. These results align with both jurors and respondents. Their strong alignment with
Sweller’s (1988) Cognitive Load Theory, which suggests that instructional objectives suggests that they are appropriate
learning effectiveness depends more on cognitive processing for use in teaching.
than on subjective perceptions of material quality. Given the The organization and structure of the videos were well-
lack of statistical significance, the null hypothesis (H₀), which received, demonstrating effective sequencing and clarity
posits that there is a significant relationship between in content delivery. These qualities contributed to
perceived video quality and academic achievement, is facilitating student learning.
accepted. This suggests that other factors, such as learning The instructional quality of the videos was rated as
strategies and classroom engagement, may play a more outstanding, confirming their effectiveness in supporting
substantial role in influencing academic performance. learning objectives and ensuring pedagogical soundness.
The video materials successfully integrated cultural
V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND elements, making them inclusive and relevant to diverse
RECOMMENDATION learners.
The overall quality of the video materials was highly
Summary rated, confirming their effectiveness and positive
This study evaluated the effectiveness of video-based reception among the target audience.
instruction in enhancing students' academic achievement. The pretest results indicated that the control and
Specifically, it examined the perceived quality of the experimental groups had comparable levels of
developed video clips in terms of relevance to the curriculum, mathematical proficiency before the intervention,
organization and structure, instructional quality, and cultural ensuring a fair basis for comparison.
formation. It also investigated the impact of video-based
The posttest results showed that students who received
instruction on student achievement by comparing pretest and
video-based instruction performed better than those in the
posttest scores between a control group and an experimental
control group, highlighting the positive impact of the
group. Additionally, the study explored whether students’ intervention on student learning.
perceived ratings of the video materials correlated with their
The statistical analysis confirmed that there was no
academic performance.
significant difference between the groups before the
intervention, ensuring the validity of the comparative
The findings revealed that both jurors and respondents
results.
rated the video materials highly across all quality indicators,
with minimal variability in responses, suggesting strong A significant improvement was observed in the
agreement on their effectiveness. Pretest scores showed no performance of students who used the video materials,
confirming their effectiveness as an instructional tool.
significant difference between the control (M = 11.05, SD =
2.74) and experimental (M = 10.68, SD = 2.36) groups, To further enhance multimedia instruction, incorporating
indicating comparable baseline knowledge levels. However, more interactive elements such as quizzes and animations
posttest scores demonstrated a statistically significant is recommended to maximize engagement and
improvement in the experimental group (M = 21.46, SD = effectiveness.
3.00) compared to the control group (M = 17.89, SD = 2.45), While the intervention yielded positive results, further
t(86) = 3.16, p = .002, confirming that students who received investigation is necessary to identify potential limitations
video-based instruction performed better. The gain scores and refine video-based learning strategies for greater
analysis further supported this finding, showing a significant impact.
difference, t(86) = 5.16, p < .001, highlighting the
effectiveness of video-based instruction in enhancing RECOMMENDATION
learning outcomes.
It is recommended that these video clips be formally
Furthermore, a Pearson correlation analysis examining integrated into the curriculum and used as supplementary
the relationship between perceived video quality and posttest teaching tools. Additionally, periodic content reviews
scores revealed a very weak and non-significant correlation, should be conducted to ensure continued alignment with
r = 0.04, p = 0.79. This suggests that students’ perceptions of evolving curriculum standards.