0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views15 pages

causelist_pdf (4)

The Bombay High Court's daily main cause list for May 2, 2025, includes various criminal cases scheduled for hearing in Court No. 28, presided over by Justices Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal and S. M. Modak. Key cases involve appeals and writ petitions related to quashing detention orders and FIRs, with several cases marked for final hearing and others facing office objections due to unserved copies. The list highlights the procedural aspects and pending applications associated with each case.

Uploaded by

sadiyaswaleh1992
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views15 pages

causelist_pdf (4)

The Bombay High Court's daily main cause list for May 2, 2025, includes various criminal cases scheduled for hearing in Court No. 28, presided over by Justices Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal and S. M. Modak. Key cases involve appeals and writ petitions related to quashing detention orders and FIRs, with several cases marked for final hearing and others facing office objections due to unserved copies. The list highlights the procedural aspects and pending applications associated with each case.

Uploaded by

sadiyaswaleh1992
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

BOMBAY HIGHCOURT

DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST


For Friday The 2nd May 2025
COURT NO. 28
DIVISION
AT 10:30 AM
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Sr. CASE NO. PARTIES ADVOCATES

AT 2.30 P.M.

1 APEAL(ST)/15/2025 MAULA NABISAB MULLA ADVAIT TAMHANKAR


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : ( U/s.21 of NIA Act) Note: 1) Cri. Appeal St. No. 15/2025 is filed delay B.T. 15 days. 2) Cri. I.A. No.
04/2025 (For condonation of delay) is pending for order, kept herewith. 3) U/t. Given- The copy of application is
not served on the PP. 4) Adv. Alpa Javeri has filed VP on behalf of appellant with consent obtain from previous
Adv. Advait Tamhankar. #Court DB for Admission at 02:30 pm.

HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)

2 WP/839/2025 SANGITA NANDU TORADMAL Aisha Z Ansari


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
REMARK : (For Quashing Detention Order)#Note:-#1) Compilation of documents is kept herewith separately. 2)
Rule granted on 21.02.2025. 3) Respondents are formal parties. Hence, Rule notice could not be issued to
Respondents. 4) Affidavit filed by the Deputy Secretary, Government of Maharashtra, Home Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai through E-filing (No.-1 AMH20240126753D202501471) on 11.03.2025 and copy of the
same is kept herewith at page nos. 46 to 50. 5) Affidavit filed by Commissioner of Police, Nashik through E-filing
(No.- AMH20240126753D202501540) on 21.03.2025 and copy of the same is kept herewith at page nos. 51 to
65. 6) Affidavit filed by the Senior Police Inspector, Mumbai through E-filing (No.-
AMH20240126753D202501541) on 21.03.2025 and copy of the same is kept herewith at page nos. 66 to 70. 7)
As per Order dated 04.04.2025, the Advocate for the Petitioner has carried out amendment on 09.04.2025 by
annexing additional grounds 'x' & 'xi' at page Nos. 18a & 18B. 8) Advocate for the petitioner has tendered
citation on 04.04.2025 is kept herewith separately. 9) Mr. Sandeep Karnik, Commissioner of Police, Nashik has
filed Affidavit on 23.04.2025 through E-filing. The copy of the same is kept herewith at Page Nos. 71 to 75. 10)
Mr. Santosh Babanrao Narute, Senior Inspector of Police, Mumbai Naka Police Station, Nashik has filed
Affidavit on 23.04.2025 through E-filing. The copy of the same is kept herewith. (Page Nos. 76 to 80. Court DB
for Final Hearing.

3 WP/1142/2025 GAURAV @ GULABYA VISHNU Akshay Bankapur


[Criminal] GHUGE
VS
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
AND ANR

26/04/2025 10:05:36 1/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 2 -

REMARK : (For Quashing Detention Order) Note :- 1) Rule granted on 13/03/2025. 2) Respondents are formal
party. Hence, Rule notice not issued as per court's order dtd 13/03/2025. 3) Mr. Deepak Vasant Sawant,
Secretary to Hon. Advisory Board (MPDA). Mumbai filed Affidavit on 15.04.2025 through E-filing. The copy of
the same is kept herewith at page nos. 120 to 123. 4) Affidavit filed by the Deputy Secretary, Government of
Maharashtra, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai through E-filing (No.-AMH20240126753D202501738) on
23.04.2025 and copy of the same is kept herewith at page nos. 124 to 128. (Court DB for Final Hearing)

4 WP/1299/2025 ABHIJIT @ CHOKYA TUKARAM PRANAV GIRME


[Criminal] YELWANDE
VS
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
AND ORS
REMARK : (For Quashing Detention Order) Note : 1) Rule granted on 21.03.2025. 2) Respondents are formal
parties. Hence, Rule notice could not be issued to respondents. 3) Affidavit in reply filed by the Superintendent,
Nashik Road Central Prison, Nashik through E-filing (No.-AMH20240126753D202501591) on 27.03.2025 and
copy of the same is kept herewith at page nos. 39 to 57. 4) Affidavit filed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune
City through E-filing (No.-AMH20240126753D202501615) on 29.03.2025 and copy of the same is kept herewith
at page nos. 58 to 83. 5) Affidavit filed by the Deputy Secretary, Government of Maharashtra, Home
Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai through E-filing (No.-AMH20240126753D202501633) on 04.04.2025 and
copy of the same is kept herewith at page nos. 84 to 89. 6) As per Order dated 21.03.2025, the advocate for the
petitioner has not carried out amendment till today. (Court DB for Order)

5 WP/1929/2025 SHRIKANT RAJU AND SHIRKYA Pranav Girme


[Criminal] JADHAV
VS
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing Detention Order) Note:-1) Rule granted on 16/04/2025 2) Respondents are formal
parties. Hence, Rule notice could not be issued. (Court DB for Final Hearing)

6 WP/2012/2025 KIRAN RAJU KHAWLE Harshwardhan Akolkar


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing Detention Order) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the
PP. - UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

7 WP/2192/2025 ISMAIL HUSAIN SHAIKH @ TAUFIQ shivamdeshmukh


[Criminal] CHEENA
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing Detention Order) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the
PP. - UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 21/04/2025.

8 WP/2403/2025 AVINASH GOPAL SHILIMKAR Adv Rishabh Vakharia


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing Detention Order) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the
PP. - UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

URGENT ADMISSION

9 WP/1928/2025 SUREKHA SURESH KOLEKAR Abhiman D Patil


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

26/04/2025 10:05:36 2/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 3 -

REMARK : (For Habeas Corpus) Note:-1) Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are formal parties . Hence, notice could not be
issued. 2) As per Court's order dtd 21/04/2025, the advocate for the petitioner has not supplied the spare copies
of petition till date i.e. 25/04/2025. Hence, notice could not be issued to Respondent Nos.4 and 5. (Court DB for
Order)

10 WP/2055/2025 BHARAT LAKSHMAN SINGH Rimpal Trivedi


[Criminal] THAKUR
VS
VENDANA BHARAT THAKUR AND
ORS
REMARK : (For Habeas Corpus) Note:- 1) As per Court's order dtd 21/04/2025, the advocate for the petitioner
has not supplied the spare copies of petition till date i.e. 25/04/2025. Hence, notice could not be issued to
Respondent Nos.1 to 6. (Court DB for Order)

11 WP/2086/2025 SALIL DESHPANDE Megha V Chandel


[Criminal] VS
SHALAKA DESHPANDE AND ANR
REMARK : (For Habeas Corpus) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

12 WP/2370/2025 SAURABH MACHINDRA SHINDE Zaid Anwar Qureshi


[Criminal] VS
DIPAK GHORGE AND ORS
REMARK : (For Habeas Corpus) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 23/04/2025.

13 WP/2383/2025 SARITA SANTPRAKASH MAURYA shrikant Ramchandra Gadade


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : (For Habeas Corpus) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

FRESH ADMISSION

14 APL/490/2025 ANIL SURYABHAN PABALE AND ORS Adv Ranjit Gangadhar Jadhav
[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : For Quashing FIR Note 1. Copy not served to PP UT given. Court DB for Admission

15 APL/491/2025 SANTOSH SHANARRAO NISALKAR G T Jadhav


[Criminal] AND ORS
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : For Quashing FIR Note 1. Copy not served to PP UT given. Court DB for Admission

16 WP/2391/2025 DEEPAK BABAN GAWALI RAVISHANKAR B THOMBARE


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

26/04/2025 10:05:36 3/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 4 -

17 WP/2394/2025 IVA SATISHCHAND BANSAL AND LAW JURIS


[Criminal] ANR
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

18 WP/2395/2025 BHUSHAN SADASHIV RAUT Ishan Paradkar


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

19 WP/2397/2025 MAMTA CHANDRASEN CHAUHAN Vedchetan Patil


[Criminal] AND ORS
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

20 WP/2401/2025 KIRAN YETALE KISHAN CHAUDHARI


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

21 WP/2407/2025 GAURAV SUNIL SOMANI Shailesh Kharat


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

FOR CIRCULATION

22 WP/4648/2018 HARITA SUNIL PARAB DR. PRAKASH K. DESHMUKH


[Criminal] VS (APPOINTED ADVOCATE)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HARITA SUNIL PARAB
(INPERSON)
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Objection : 1) English Translation is not filed. U.T.Given. 2) Copies not served to
P.P.U.T.Given. 3) Handwritten page nos.58-79.U.T.Given. Note : 1) As per order dated. 9.10.2018 passed in Cri. APL
No. 752/2018, Petitioner-In-Person has carried out amendment on 16.10.2018 by adding amendment slip is kept at
page no. 17(A) to 17 (H) and 19(A) to 19 (B) and matter converted into Criminal Writ Petition. 2) Writ issued. 3) As per
Court's order dt. 06/08/2019 and 03.01.2022, Petitioner in Person filed Interim Application for Amendment are kept
herewith. 4) a/w IA 1862/22 (Amendment) Cri.W.P.No. 2740/2015 a/w IA 1868/22 (Amendment), Cri. W.P. No.
3185/2015 a/w IA 1866/22 (Amendment), Cri. W.P. No. 3186/2015 a/w IA 1864/22 (Amendment), Cri.W.P.Nos.
3187/2015 a/w IA 1865/22 (Amendment), Cri. W.P. No. 2813/2018 a/w IA 1867/22 (Amendment), Cri.W.P.No.
2573/2015 a/w IA 1863/22 (Amendment), Cri.W.P.No. 4454/19, Cri.W.P.No. 4685/19 are kept herewith. 5) As per order
dated. 27.07.2022, the Petitioner-In-Person has not carried out amendment for adding the Complainants as the party
Respondents to the Petitions nor has provided the name and address of the complainants to the office, hence the
notice to the Complainants could not be issued. 6) As per the Administrative order passed by the Honourable The Chief
Justice on 28.11.2022, Criminal Writ Petition No. 2740/2015 alongwith all other connected matter has been directed to
be placed before the Division Bench taking up Criminal Writ Petition matters not assigned to other Court. 7) As per the
Administrative Order passed by the Hon'ble The Chief Justice on 26.03.2025, to place Criminal W.P. No. 2740/2015
and connected matters before the Hon'ble Division Bench as per the Administrative Order dated 28.11.2022. Court
D.B. For Orders. Circulation granted for 02/05/2025

26/04/2025 10:05:36 4/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 5 -

with

IA/1862/2022 HARITA SUNIL PARAB


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
In ORS.
WP/4648/2018

WITH

WP/2573/2015 HARITA SUNIL PARAB SUDHIR CHANNAPPA HALLI


[Criminal] VS DR. PRAKASH K. DESHMUKH (
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA APPOINTED ADVOCATE)
AND ANR

REMARK: (FOR QUASHING FIR). OBJECTIONS: 1)Typed English Translation of relevant order, judgment
is not filed. U/T Given 2) The photocopy/copies annexed are not legible. U/T Given.3) The copy of
Application is not served on the public prosecutor.U/T Given. : ## Note: 1)As per Courts order dated
07/09/2015, Contempt Notice issued to the Petitioner In Person Ms. Harita Sunil Parab is received back
unserved. ##2)Bailable warrant issued. ##3)As per administrative order dated 20/06/2017 passed by the
Hon. Chief Justice on office submission dated 14/06/2017, Criminal Writ Petition No.2573/2015 along with
connected matters is directed to be placed before the Division Bench presided over by Hon. Shri Justice
V.M.Kanade, copy of which is kept herewith. :## Court D.B. For Orders.
With

IA/1863/2022 HARITA SUNIL PARAB


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
In AND ORS.
WP/2573/2015

WITH

WP/2740/2015 HARITA SUNIL PARAB HARITA S. PARAB (IN-PERSO


[Criminal] VS N)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DR. PRAKASH K. DESHMUKH (
AND ORS APPOINTED ADVOCATE)

REMARK: FOR QUASHING FIR. #Objection:- (1) Typed English translation of relevant order, judgment is
not filed U/T given #(2) The photocopy/copies not annexed are not legible U/T given #(3) The copy of
application is not served on PP. U/T given. :## Note: 1)Cri.W.P.Nos.2573/2015, 3185/2015, 3186/2015,
3187/2015, 2812/2018, 2813/2018, 4648/2018 and 3499/2019 are kept herewith. ##2)Writ issued as per
order dated 25/08/2016. ##3)Supreme Courts Order dated 06/04/2017 in Special Leave Petition
(CRL.)Nos.10099-10103 of 2016 is kept herewith. ##4)Writ issued in all connected matters as per order
dated 21/06/2017. ##5)As per administrative order dated 24/07/2019 passed by the Hon. Chief Justice on
office submission dated 24/07/2019, Cri.W.P.No.3185/2015 along with Cri.W.P.Nos.3186/2015, 3187/2015,
2740/2015, 2573/2015, 2812/2018, 2813/2018, 4648/2018 and 3499/2019 are directed to be placed before
the Division Bench headed by Hon. Shri Justice Indrajit Mahanty, copy of which is kept herewith for kind
perusal of the Hon. Court.##2)As per Court's order dt. 06/08/2019, the Petitioner in Person has not
carried out amendment till today i.e. 23/02/2021. : ## Court D.B. For Circulation on 24/02/2021.
With

IA/1868/2022 HARITA SUNIL PARAB AND AN


[Criminal] R.

26/04/2025 10:05:36 5/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 6 -

VS
In THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
WP/2740/2015 AND ORS.

With

IA/1565/2023 HARITA SUNIL PARAB


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
In AND ORS
WP/2740/2015

WITH

WP/2813/2018 HARITA SUNIL PARAB PARAB HARITA SUNIL


[Criminal] VS DR. PRAKASH K. DESHMUKH (
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA APPOINTED ADVOCATE)
AND ORS.

REMARK: FOR (Direction):-##Objections:-##(1)Typed English Translation of relevant order / judgment is


not filed-U/T Given;##(2)The copy of application is not served on PP & Ors-U/T Given;##(3)Hand Written
pages- 22-76-U/T Given;##Court DB For Admission/Fresh.
With

IA/1867/2022 HARITA SUNIL PARAB AND AN


[Criminal] R.
VS
In THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
WP/2813/2018 AND ORS.

WITH

WP/3185/2015 HARITA SUNIL PARAB HARITA SUNIL PARAB (IN-PE


[Criminal] VS RSON)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DR. PRAKASH K. DESHMUKH (
AND ORS APPOINTED ADVOCATE)

With

IA/1866/2022 HARITA SUNIL PARAB


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
In AND ORS
WP/3185/2015

WITH

WP/3186/2015 HARITA SUNIL PARAB HARITA PARAB (IN-PERSON)


[Criminal] VS DR. PRAKASH K. DESHMUKH (
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA APPOINTED ADVOCATE)
AND ORS
With

26/04/2025 10:05:36 6/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 7 -

IA/1864/2022 HARITA SUNIL PARAB


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
In AND ORS
WP/3186/2015

WITH

WP/3187/2015 HARITA SUNIL PARAB HARITA SUNIL PARAB (IN-PE


[Criminal] VS RSON)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DR. PRAKASH K. DESHMUKH (
AND ORS APPOINTED ADVOCATE)

With

IA/1865/2022 HARITA SUNIL PARAB


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
In AND ORS
WP/3187/2015

WITH

WP/4454/2019 HARITA SUNIL PARAB PARAB HARITA SUNIL


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
AND ORS

REMARK: FOR (Directions):-##Objections:-##(1The copy of application is not served on PP & Ors-U/T


Given;##(2)How maintainable Direction to different Authority-U/T## Note:- 1) Spare Copy for
Respondent No. 2 to 8 are kept herewith in Office Part.## 2) As per court order dated 03.01.2022,
amendment not carried out till date i.e. 26.02.2022 Court DB For Orders
WITH

WP/4685/2019 HARITA SUNIL PARAB PARAB HARITA SUNIL


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
AND ORS.

REMARK: FOR (Directions):-##Objections:-##(1)Typed English Translation of relevant order / judgment


is not filed-U/T Given;##(2)The copy of application is not served on PP & Ors-U/T Given;##(3)Hand
Written pages- 22 to 45-U/T Given; ##(4)Certificate from Committee postage & Self Add require before
Court is require to obtain.## 5) As per court order dated 03.01.2022, amendment not carried out till date
i.e. 26.02.2022 Court DB For Orders.
23 WP/2255/2022 PRADEEP DSOUZA AMRITA NAIR
[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection :1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. Note :-1) Learned APP waives notice on behalf of the sole Respondent on 13/10/2022. 2) As per court's
order dtd 22/03/2024 in Cri. IA No.1210/2024, the Cri.WP No.2255/2022 is restored. Court DB for Admission /
After Notice. Circulation granted for 02/05/2025

26/04/2025 10:05:36 7/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 8 -

24 WP(ST)/21031/2022 ANANDIDAS SHIVANANDRAO Ranjeet Nair


[Criminal] RAHATIKAR
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : FOR QUASHING FIR # Office Objection : # 1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not
filed. UT given.--# 2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given.-- # 3] CC copy of FIR required.
UT given, accepted by Reg. Judl.(II) Note:-1) Notice issued to Respondent no. 2 is not received back duly served
or unserved. (Court DB for Order) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025.

25 APL/45/2023 RAMNIK SINGH DHILLON VANRAJ SHINDE


[Criminal] VS MOHD TAHA
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR.
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Note : (1) Typed English Translation of relevant order, judgment is not filed. UT
Given. (2) Adv. Shaikh Mohammad Taha has filed V.P. for Respondent No. 2. Court D.B. For Admission. (Coram:
Sarang V. Kotwal and S.M. Modak, JJ.) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025 Date : 24/04/2025 For Reg.(J)
(Matter with Court)

26 WP/1974/2023 PRAVIN RAJU SHARMA AND ANR Amit Singh


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : FOR QUASHING FIR Note:-1) Rule granted on 15/06/2023. 2) Advocate for the petitioner has
supplied spare copy of the petition. Hence, rule notice could not be issued to Respondent no. 2. 3) Rule writ
issued. 4) As per Order dt. 15/06/2023, Advocate for the petitioner has carried out amendment forthwith. Court
DB for Order. Circulation granted for 02/05/2025. (By Consent)

27 WP/668/2024 RANJANA ADESH YADAV AND ORS Vrushali L Maindad


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection :1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given.2] Photo copies annexed are not legible - pg. nos. 74 to 79 - UT given,3] Typed copy is not given of H/W.
pages. - pg. nos. 129 - UT given. Note:-1) Notice issued to Respondent no. 2 is received back duly served. 2)
Letter dated 30/11/2024 tendered in court by the Advocate for the Petitioner on 16/12/2024 is taken on record
and marked "X" for identification and same is kept herewith. 3) As per Court’s Order dated 16/12/2024, the
Advocate for the petitioner has carried out amendment on 13/01/2025 by adding the copy of Chargesheet and
copy of the Letter dated 30/11/2024 sent by PSI, Navghar Police Station at Exhibit "T" from Page Nos.144 to
268 to the Petition.#4) The Affidavit on behalf of the Petitioner No.1 filed on 11/02/2025 is kept herewith
(Pagination not done properly -- Page Nos. 266-271) 5) Matter is listed on 07/04/2025 at sr. no. 80 and same is
not yet received in branch. (Court DB for Admission / After Notice) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025

28 WP/2787/2024 MOHD HASNAIN ABUDL RASHID NAZNEEN KHATRI


[Criminal] AND ORS TASMIYA MENON
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. -
UT given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. Note:-1) As per Court's order dtd
02/07/2024, the Affidavit in Reply filed by the Advocate for the Respondent No.2 on 05/07/2024 is kept herewith
at Page Nos. 35-39. 2) Advocate Tasmiya Monon has filed Vakalatnama for Respondent no. 2. (Court DB for
Admission ) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025 (By Consent)

26/04/2025 10:05:36 8/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 9 -

29 WP/2894/2024 AJAY MITTAL S/O SHRI SHANKAR MZM Legal


[Criminal] LAL MITTAL HAFEEZUR RAHMAN
VS
CENTRAL BUREAU OF BANKING
SECURITIES FRAUD BRANCH (BFSB)
AND ORS.
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Note:- 1) Writ issued. 2) As per court's orders dtd 04/07/2024 and 26/07/2024
the Affidavit in Reply filed by the Jayanta Paul, Dy. Superintendent of Police, C.B.I., Banking Securities Fraud
Branch, CGO Complex, DF Block, Salt Late, Sector 1, Kolkata through Ld. Special P.P. for the Respondent No.1-
CBI on 22/08/2024 is kept herewith at pg. nos. 1692-1719 in Volume -VI 3) Cri.WP No.2897/2024 is kept
herewith. 4) Advocate Hafeezur Rahman has filed Vakalatnama for Respondent no. 2. 5) As per Court's order
dated 23/08/2024 & 19.09.2024, the Affidavit in Reply has filed by the Advocate for Respondent No. 2 on
11/10/2024 is kept herewith at Page Nos.1720-1789 in Volume -VI 6) As per Order dated 22.01.2025, the
advocate for the petitioner has removed all office objections on 10.02.2025. (Court DB for Admission)
Circulation granted for 02/05/2025

WITH

WP/2897/2024 ARCHANA MITTAL W/O AJAY M MZM Legal


[Criminal] ITTAL HAFEEZUR RAHMAN
VS
CENTRAL BUREAU INVESTIGAT
ION AND ORS.

REMARK: (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not
filed. - UT given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #3] Photo copies annexed
are not legible - UT given. #4] Small fonts pages / statements are annexed is required in appropriate font.
UT given. #5] Typed copy is not given of H/W. pages. UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)
Circulation granted for 04.07.2024.
30 WP/3327/2024 PRADEEP SURESH JODHANI AND Rajesh Vishnu Adrekar
[Criminal] ANR
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. #2] Small fonts pages / statements are annexed is required in appropriate font. UT given. Note:-1) As per
Order dt. 03/04/2025 passed in IA 852/2025, Cri. WP 3327/2024 is restored. (Cri. IA 852/2025 is disposed off
and kept in office part) 2) Restoration writ issued. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for
02/05/2025 by consent

31 WP/4591/2024 HARITA SUNIL PARAB


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : 1] Typed copy is not given of H/W. Pages - UT given. (Court
DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025

32 WP/4592/2024 HARITA S PARAB AND ANR


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ORS
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : 1] Typed copy is not given of H/W. Pages - UT given.#2] Copy
of original FIR is not filed. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025

26/04/2025 10:05:36 9/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 10 -

33 WP/4892/2024 HARSHADA RUTURAJ PRADHAN Akash Kavade


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025.

34 WP/5241/2024 AMIR INAYAT KHAN pankaj dwivedi


[Criminal] VS
NILOFAR AMIR KHAN AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025.

35 WP/5405/2024 KASHINATH KISAN DEOKATE Pravin Sabban


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given.
#2] Photo copies annexed are not legible - UT given. Note:- 1) The Certified copy of FIR No.182/2023 is kept
herewith in I(i) part of Proceeding (Only one set filed) 2) As per court's order dtd 07/01/2025, the Office
objection not removed by the Advocate for the Petitioner till today. 3) Vakalatnama filed by advocate for the
petitioner on 24.02.2025 (N.O.C obtained). (Court DB for Order) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025.

36 WP/5481/2024 KASHINATH KISAN DEOKATE Pravin Sabban


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Note:-1) The Certified copy of FIR No.202/2024 filed by the Advocate for the
Petitioner on 25/11/2024 is kept herewith in I(i) part of proceeding (Only one copy of FIR filed) 2) Vakalatnama
filed by advocate for the petitioner on 24.02.2025 (N.O.C. obtained) (Court DB for Admission) Circulation
granted for 02/05/2025.

37 WP/5510/2024 SHRIRAM PADMNABH POONJA RISHABH KHOT


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] Appeal memo back to back each page not typed as per
rule No. 26 of Chapter IV of Appellate Side Rule, 1960. U/t accepted by Registrar (Judicial).#2] Photo copies
annexed are not legible - UT given. #3] There are underlines/marking on. #4] The copy of application is not
served on the PP. - UT given.#5] Small fonts pages / statements are annexed is required in appropriate font. UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025.

38 WP/267/2025 MITESH RAMESHCHANDRA SHAH DINESH L VISHWAKARMA


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025.

39 APL/336/2025 NIKHIL SHANTARAM CHOUDHARI Siddhant H Deshpande


[Criminal] AND ORS
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : For Quashing FIR Note 1. The copy of application is not served on the PP. UT given. 2. Copy of original FIR is required UT accepted by RJ
II. Court D.B for Admission. (Coram: Sarang V. Kotwal and S.M. Modak, JJ.) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025 Date : 22/04/2025 For Reg.(J)

26/04/2025 10:05:36 10/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 11 -

40 APEAL/452/2025 HARPREET KAUR DANG Gaurav Parkar


[Criminal] VS
BANK OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (To Quash and Set Aside) ( U/s. 11 of MPID) Note: 1) Cri. Appeal No. 452 of 2025 is filed in time. 2)
The copy of application is not served on the public prosecutor, U/t is given. 3) As per impugned order other
parties are not made respondents. U/t is given. Court D.B. for Admission. Coram : SARANG V. KOTWAL AND
S.M. MODAK,JJ. Circulation granted for 02/05/2025 Dtd. 25/04/2025 for Regr. (J)

41 IA/469/2025 NANDKUMAR GOPAL RAGHUVEER Kishor Redekar


[Criminal] AND ORS Kishor Redekar
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : For Direction Note 1) Typed English Translation of relevant order, judgment is not filed. UT Given.
2) The copy of application is not served on the PP. UT given. Court SJ for Order. (Coram: Sarang V. Kotwal and
S.M. Modak, JJ.) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025 Date : 25/04/2025 For Reg.(J)

42 APL/479/2025 YUVRAJ SANTOSH RATHOD AND P B GUJAR


[Criminal] ORS
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : For Quashing FIR Note 1) The copy of application is not served on the PP. UT given. Court DB for
Admission (Coram: Sarang V. Kotwal and S.M. Modak, JJ.) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025 Date :
22/04/2025 For Reg.(J)

43 APL/487/2025 MANISH LAXMAN GAIKAR AND ANR RAVINDRA SINGH


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : For Quashing FIR Note 1. Copy not served to PP UT given. 2. Copy of FIR 43/2025 UT accepted by
Reg-Judl-II. Court DB for Admission

44 APL/500/2025 IRFAN ABDUL REHMAN MOMIN IMTIYAZ AHMED ISMAILSHA


[Criminal] VS PATEL
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
REMARK : For Quashing FIR Note 1. Copy not served to PP UT given. Court DB for Admission (Coram: Sarang
V. Kotwal and S.M. Modak, JJ.) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025 Date : 25/04/2025 For Reg.(J)

45 IA/771/2025 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AVINASH BHASKAR AVHAD


[Criminal] VS Juris Corp
ANURADHA DIDWANIA AND ORS APPELLANT NO. 1 TO 4
PARINAM LAW ASSOCIATES
SANDEEP RAMAKANT KARNIK
RESPONDENT NO.2
REBECCA GONSALVEZ
REBECCA GONSALVEZ
REMARK : (For Extension of Time): Note : 1) Cri. Appeal No. 1341 of 2018 is disposed off on 07.10.2024. 2)
That Vakalatnama file. Adv. Avinash Avhad was not given note of appearance in Appeal No. 1341/2018, Now he
has filed note of appearance as Special P. P. in this Interim Application. 3) The copy of application is not served
on the public prosecutor. - U/T. #Court DB for Orders. Coram: SARANG V. KOTWAL & S.M. MODAK,JJ.
Circulation granted for 02/05/2025. Dated 25/04/2025 for Reg. Judl(I).

46 WP(ST)/987/2025 Eric Nariman Dhatigara Pandey Sneha Ramesh


[Criminal] VS Pandey Sneha Ramesh
(AMH20230010665C20240 State of Maharashtra through Cuffe
0002) Parade Police Station

26/04/2025 10:05:36 11/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 12 -

REMARK : e-Filing No. AMH20230010665C202400002 (For Quashing FIR) (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)
Circulation granted for 02/05/2025.

47 WP/1034/2025 MANOJ KUMAR GOGIA AND ANR KIRAN MOHITE


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025. (By
Consent)

48 IA/1319/2025 PRAVIN MALKANI Jayant Bardeskar


[Criminal] VS JAYANT JOSEPH BARDESKAR
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR SUSHMITA SHERIGAR
REMARK : For Direction Note 1) Typed English Translation of relevant order, judgment is not filed. UT Given.
2) The photocopy/copies annexed are not legible. UT given. 3) The copy of application is not served on the PP.
UT given. 4) Typed copy is not given of hand written pages. UT given. Court DB for Order 5) APL 947/2019
disposed on 08/10/2024, is tagged herewith. Court D.B. For Admission. (Coram: Sarang V. Kotwal and S.M.
Modak, JJ.) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025 Date : 25/04/2025 For Reg.(J) (Matter with Court)

49 WP(ST)/1943/2025 Priya Aniket Sagavkar alias Priya Dipti Bawne


[Criminal] Rukmangad Bawne
(AMH20250000929C20250 VS
0001) State of Maharashtra
REMARK : For Quashing FIR:- E-filing no. AMH20250000929C202500001. Note : 1) Hard copy of the petition
(Cri. W.P. (st) No. 1943/25) tendered in Court on 07.02.2025 by Advocate for the petitioner is taken on record
and the same is kept herewith. 2) both the parties not comply the Order dated 07.02.2025 till today. Court DB
for Order. Circulation granted for 02/05/2025. (By Consent)

50 WP/2095/2025 SHITAL DENIS BARNAD ADV ABHISHEK KULKARNI


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ORS
REMARK : (For Quashing Proceedings arising out of FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not
served on the PP. - UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025

51 WP/2108/2025 SHIV SHANKAR ALIAS SHIVAJI Profess Law Associates


[Criminal] MAURYA S/O SHIR JAGNNATH
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025

52 WP/2387/2025 HEM PRABHAKER SHAH Marmik Shah


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing Look Out Notice) (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for
02/05/2025

53 WP/2424/2025 DEEPAK RAJARAM SAROJ Diwakar Dwivedi


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #2] Copy of
original FIR is not filed. - UT accepted by Registrar (Judicial-II). (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for
02/05/2025.

26/04/2025 10:05:36 12/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 13 -

54 WP/2437/2025 AVINASH MADHUKAR Chaitanya K


[Criminal] KONDIGREKAR
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ORS
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 02/05/2025.

55 APEAL(ST)/6384/2025 HUZAIF ABDUL AZIZ SHAIKH Mukesh Modi


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : (U/s. 21 of NIA Act): Note: 1) That the Cri. Appeal St. No. 6384 of 2025 is filed beyond one
prescribed period of limitation by 13 days. 2) The copy of application is not served on the public prosecutor. -
U/T. 3) Cri. I. A. No. 1153 of 2025 (for Bail) is pending and kept herewith for orders. 4) Cri. I.A. No. 1391/2025
(For Condonation of Delay) is pending for orders, kept herewith. -Court DB for Admission. Coram : Sarang V.
Kotwal and S M Modak, JJ. Circulation granted for 02/05/2025 Dated 22/04/2025 for Reg. Judl(I)

with

IA/1153/2025 HUZAIF ABDUL AZIZ SHAIKH Mukesh Modi


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

with

IA/1391/2025 HUZAIF ABDUL AZIZ SHAIKH Mukesh Modi


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

56 WP(ST)/7689/2025 IMRAN SHARFUDDIN KASKAR Mahesh Gupta


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. #2] Type Copy of FIR is required- UT given (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for
02/05/2025.

DUE ADMISSION - 1

57 WP/327/2024 HANMANT @APPA MAROTI AKSHARA SHARAD MADAKE


[Criminal] HATNURE AND ANR M V Thorat
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed.
UT given.#3] Photo copies annexed are not legible - UT given#4] Small fonts pages / statements are annexed is
required in appropriate font. UT given. #5] Typed copy is not given of H/W. pages. UT given. #6] Copy of
original FIR is not filed. - UT accepted by Registrar (judicial-II). Note:-1) Vakalatnama filed for Respondent no.
2. 2) Writ issued. (Court DB for Admission / After Notice)

58 APL/419/2025 ABHIJEET BALASAHEB GODSE AND PRABHANJAN GUJAR


[Criminal] ORS
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : For Quashing FIR Note 1. Copy not served to PP UT given. Court DB for Admission

26/04/2025 10:05:36 13/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 14 -

59 WP/2075/2025 SURAJ ARJUN SURWASE AND ORS Tushar Kochale


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

60 WP/2164/2025 DILIP JAGDISH SHARMA SRK Legal


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

61 WP/2207/2025 PRAVIN HARI RATHOD AND ORS Vasant


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

62 WP/277/2023 GAUTAM VISHWANAND Nitesh Jaywant Mohite


[Criminal] PASHANKAR AND ANR. janhavi karnik
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR.
REMARK : FOR QUASHING FIR#Office Objection :1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed.
UT given.2] Copy of original FIR required. UT accepted by Reg. Jud(II) Note : 1) Spare copy filed by the
Advocate for the Petitioner #2) Cri. IA No.104/2023 For Intervener is kept herewith. 3) As per court's order dtd
13/01/2025, the Office objection not removed by the Advocate for the Petitioner till today. (Court DB for Order)

with

IA/104/2023 SADHANABAI ROOPCHAND BAFN Nashikkar Gaurav Vishwas


[Criminal] A AND ORS
VS
In STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
WP/277/2023 ANR.

63 WP/6162/2024 HARSHAD PRADIP KHEDKAR AND Om Latpate


[Criminal] ANR
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : 1] Typed copy is not given of H/W. pages. UT given. Note:-1)
As per Order dated 21.01.2025, the advocate for the petitioner has not removed office objections till today. 2)
As per Court’s Order dated 03/03/2025, the Advocate for the petitioner has carried out amendment on
12/03/2025 by adding the copy of Chargesheet at Exhibit "H" from Page Nos.80 to 119 to the Petition. 3) Notice
issued to Respondent No.2 is served. (Court DB for Order)

64 WP/610/2025 JAYESH JEEVAN KAMBLI AND ANR DURGESH JAISWAL


[Criminal] VS Ganesh
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR

26/04/2025 10:05:36 14/15


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 28-FOR FRIDAY THE 2ND MAY 2025 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 15 -

REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection :1] Copy of original FIR is not filed. - UT accepted by Registrar
(Judicial-II) Note:-1) Vakalatnama filed for Respondent No. 2. 2) Advocate for the Respondent no. 2 has filed
affidavit in reply on 24/01/2025 is kept herewith at Page Nos.16-18. 3) As per Court's order dtd 06/02/2025, the
Advocate for the Petitioner has carried out amendment in Court by impleading Respondent No. 3. 4) As per
Court's order dtd 06/02/2025, the Advocate for the Petitioner has not supplied spare copy of petition till date i.e.
25/04/2025. Hence, notice could not be issued to Respondent No.3 (Court DB for Order)

26/04/2025 10:05:36 15/15

You might also like