Scribd
Upload
3 views

GROUP-6-Module14

The document outlines a grading rubric for group activities, assessing four key areas: Group Collaboration, Presentation Skills, Quality of Content, and Organization and Structure. Each area is scored on a scale from 10 to 30 points, with specific criteria for each score level. The overall scores indicate strong performance in Presentation Skills, Quality of Content, Organization and Structure, and Excellent collaboration and creativity.

Uploaded by

Raeli
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3 views

GROUP-6-Module14

The document outlines a grading rubric for group activities, assessing four key areas: Group Collaboration, Presentation Skills, Quality of Content, and Organization and Structure. Each area is scored on a scale from 10 to 30 points, with specific criteria for each score level. The overall scores indicate strong performance in Presentation Skills, Quality of Content, Organization and Structure, and Excellent collaboration and creativity.

Uploaded by

Raeli
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Group Activity Grading Rubric

1. Group Collaboration

 Excellent (30 points): All group members actively participated and contributed equally. The group worked collaboratively and resolved conflicts
effectively.
 Good (25 points): Most group members participated and contributed. Minor conflicts were resolved with some assistance.
 Satisfactory (20 points): Some members participated more than others. Conflicts were resolved with considerable help or guidance.
 Needs Improvement (15 points): Unequal participation from members. Conflicts were poorly managed, affecting the group's effectiveness.
 Unsatisfactory (10 points): Minimal participation from some members. The group struggled significantly with conflict resolution and collaboration.

Score: Good

5. Presentation Skills

 Excellent (25 points): Presentation is clear, confident, and engaging. All members contribute effectively, and visuals (if used) are professional and
enhance the content.
 Good (20 points): Presentation is clear and mostly engaging. Most members contribute, and visuals are appropriate and helpful.
 Satisfactory (15 points): Presentation is somewhat clear, with some members contributing. Visuals are used but may not be very effective.
 Needs Improvement (10 points): Presentation lacks clarity or engagement. Uneven contribution from members and visuals are poorly designed or used
ineffectively.
 Unsatisfactory (5 points): Presentation is unclear and unengaging. Limited or no contribution from members and visuals are ineffective or absent.

Score: Excellent

2. Quality of Content

 Excellent (15 points): The content is comprehensive, accurate, and highly relevant. Demonstrates in-depth understanding and insight.
 Good (12 points): The content is accurate and relevant, with a clear understanding of key concepts. Some areas could be more detailed.
 Satisfactory (9 points): The content is mostly accurate and relevant but lacks depth or has some minor inaccuracies.
 Needs Improvement (6 points): The content has several inaccuracies or is only partially relevant. Shows a limited understanding of the topic.
 Unsatisfactory (3 points): The content is largely inaccurate or irrelevant, demonstrating a lack of understanding.

Score: Excellent

3. Organization and Structure

 Excellent (15 points): The presentation or report is well-organized, with a clear structure and logical flow. Transitions between sections are smooth.
 Good (12 points): The organization is clear, with a logical structure and mostly smooth transitions between sections.
 Satisfactory (9 points): The structure is somewhat clear, but the organization could be improved for better flow and coherence.
 Needs Improvement (6 points): The organization is unclear or disjointed, affecting the overall flow and understanding of the content.
 Unsatisfactory (3 points): The structure is poorly organized, making the content difficult to follow and understand.

Score: Excellent

4. Creativity and Originality

 Excellent (15 points): Demonstrates exceptional creativity and originality. Ideas are innovative and engaging.
 Good (12 points): Shows creativity and some originality. Ideas are engaging but may follow conventional approaches.
 Satisfactory (9 points): Some creative elements are present, but the approach is mostly conventional with limited originality.
 Needs Improvement (6 points): Minimal creativity or originality. The approach is predictable and lacks engagement.
 Unsatisfactory (3 points): No evidence of creativity or originality. The approach is entirely conventional and unengaging.

Score: Excellent

You might also like