Qualitative Researcher Vulnerability Negotiating, Experiencing and Embracing, 1st Edition Unrestricted Download
Qualitative Researcher Vulnerability Negotiating, Experiencing and Embracing, 1st Edition Unrestricted Download
Visit the link below to download the full version of this book:
https://medipdf.com/product/qualitative-researcher-vulnerability-negotiating-exp
eriencing-and-embracing-1st-edition/
SECTION I
Strategies for Negotiating Researcher Vulnerability 41
SECTION II
Experiences of Researcher Vulnerability 121
SECTION III
Embracing Researcher Vulnerability 187
Index 238
ILLUSTRATIONS
Figures
2.1 Two Parts of a Whole 49
2.2 Two Parts of a Whole 2 49
3.1 Overview of the Framework to Protect against Research Vulnerabilities
in Online Research 63
8.1 Fighting Phallusy 155
10.1 Gendered Mentoring 198
Table
5.1 Principles Nine and Ten of the Trauma and Resilience
Informed Research Principles and Practices Framework 102
CONTRIBUTORS
Kia Banks is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Qualitative Research and a
student on the BA (Hons) Education with Psychology course at the University
of Bath. Her current primary interests lie in epistemic injustices, climate justice,
and curricula analysis each understood through an educational and sociocultural
anthropological lens. Kia hopes to contribute to research and policy analysis in
education post university.
of Sports Medicine, and a Qualitative Research Editor of BMJ Open Sport and
Exercise Medicine. She completed a Prize Research Fellowship in Injury Prevention
at the University of Bath from 2018 to 2020, and received the 2019 British Journal
of Sports Medicine Editors’ Choice Academy Award for her PhD research.
Nicole Brown is a writer, social researcher, and Associate Professor working on the
cusp of research/practice/teaching. She is Director of Social Research & Practice and
Education Ltd and Associate Professor at University College London. Nicole’s creative
and research work relate to physical and material representations of experiences, the
generation of knowledge, the use of metaphors, and more generally, research methods
and approaches to explore identity and body work. Her books include Lived Experiences
of Ableism in Academia: Strategies for Inclusion in Higher Education, Ableism in Academia:
Theorising Experiences of Disabilities and Chronic Illnesses in Higher Education, Embodied
Inquiry: Research Methods, and Making the Most of Your Research Journal. Her next books
are Creativity in Education: International Perspectives and Photovoice, Reimagined. Nicole’s
creative nonfiction has been published in the Journal of Participatory Research Methods,
So Fi Zine and The AutoEthnographer. Nicole shares her work at https://www.nicole-
brown.co.uk and she tweets as @ncjbrown and @AbleismAcademia.
Bryan C. Clift is Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) and Director of the Centre
for Qualitative Research (CQR) in the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
and Department for Health at the University of Bath, UK. His research is oriented
around sport and physical activity in relation to the cultural economy and qualita-
tive inquiry. He recently co-edited with Alan Tomlinson Populism in Sport, Leisure,
and Popular Culture (Routledge, 2021), and with colleagues in the CQR Temporality
in Qualitative Inquiry (Routledge, 2021).
Rhea Ashley Hoskin is an AMTD Global Talent Postdoctoral Fellow at the University
of Waterloo and St. Jerome’s, where she is cross-appointed to the departments of
Sociology & Legal Studies, and Sexuality, Marriage, & Family Studies. Hoskin’s
work focuses on Critical Femininities, Femme Theory, and femmephobia. More
specifically, her work examines perceptions of femininity and sources of preju-
dice rooted in the devaluation or regulation of femininity, as well as strategies for
revaluing and rethinking femininity. Hoskin completed her MA in Gender Studies
and her PhD in Sociology from Queen’s University. In 2019, she was awarded the
Governor General’s Academic Gold Medal at Queen’s University for her work on
Femme Theory. Dr. Hoskin is an associate editor of Psychology & Sexuality, and
co-founder of LGBTQ Psychology Canada.
flexible research role in which she participated in MMA. These outlined areas of
interest were central not just to the sport of MMA but to bodies in everyday life,
including sexual harassment, boundaries of humour, and the liminality of violence
in interaction. Zoe continues to research and teach in these areas.
Milli Lake is a feminist, a researcher, and Associate Professor at the London School
of Economics’ Department of International Relations. She completed her PhD in
Political Science at the University of Washington in 2014, and her research and
writing focuses on political violence, institutions, and methodology.
Over the last several years, students, research assistants, and professional and aca-
demic staff have come together to create and develop the Centre for Qualitative
Research (CQR) at the University of Bath. The Centre engages in several activities
within the University and outside of its walls, all of which coalesce around educa-
tion and training, industry collaboration, and research. One of our primary activi-
ties is hosting the Qualitative Research Symposium (QRS), an annual Symposium that
is organised around one common theme. The Symposium is intended to be a space
for qualitative researchers across all disciplines to come together to discuss, debate,
explore, transfer, and translate their knowledge and understanding of qualitative
research across our respective disciplines, institutions, organisations, and contexts.
To date, the Symposium has hosted more than 900 participants across the spectrum
of career stages, and we hope will continue to attract the research voices of multiple,
diverse individuals and groups.
The impetus for this book grows out of the eighth annual QRS hosted at the
University of Bath in February 2022. The theme for the 2022 Symposium was
Researcher Vulnerability. Leading up to, throughout, and after the Symposium, we
reviewed several resources on the topic (many of which are incorporated here). In
reading the diversity of scholarship on vulnerability across disciplines, and in see-
ing the limited exploration of vulnerability in relation to the qualitative researcher
(although this is changing…), this book became a way to focus on how researcher
vulnerability is framed, negotiated, experienced, managed, or embraced. We feel
it is a useful contribution to how qualitative researchers think about themselves in
relation to their work and participants.
We hope that this book becomes a supplementary text for undergraduate,
postgraduate students, and researchers who are utilising qualitative research in
their teaching and research. It will be especially useful for researchers examining
xvi Acknowledgements
(potentially) sensitive topics, or for those who wish to develop more responsive,
responsible, ethical, or reciprocal approaches to qualitative research practices.
As with all Symposia, there is a tremendous amount of support and work that
goes into a successful event. That collective effort in turn creates the possibility
for this book. At the University of Bath, several people have provided support for
the 2022 QRS. Institutional support from David Galbreath, former Dean of the
Faculty of Humanity and Social Sciences, and Neil Bannister and Ana Bullock
in the Doctoral College make the event feasible within the institution. In the
Department for Health, Fiona Gillison, former Head of Department, has consist-
ently supported the Symposium in a variety of ways, all of which enabled us to
work on this collective project. Administratively, Michelle Hicks, Stephen Coles,
Krisztina Perecsenyi, and Harriet Fender provide indispensable guidance and assis-
tance in several forms. For the 2022 QRS, a postgraduate team helps organise
and facilitate the event, including: Amber Van Den Akker, Hala Alaouie, Sarra
Boukhari, Katharina Hug, Imene Taibi, and Emrah Yildirim. Each attendee and
presenter created the atmosphere wherein sharing, discussing, and exploring qual-
itative research takes shape. Notable at the event this year was Milli Lake, whose
keynote talk prompted thought-provoking considerations of power within quali-
tative research in relation to vulnerability, and Nicole Brown, whose plenary ses-
sion offered insight into how we all might utilise researcher journaling to monitor,
inspect, and negotiate vulnerability.
To all authors in this text: We are grateful to each of you for working with us on
this interdisciplinary project. The lingering effects of COVID-19 continued around
us all in various ways while working on this book. Your care, insight, and effort
to bring this collaborative project to fruition were both supportive and inspiring.
At Routledge/Taylor & Francis, we continue to enjoy and appreciate the sub-
lime Hannah Shakespeare and Matt Bickerton for their help in numerous ways, and
to Lucy Kennedy for helping us finish this project.
We would also like to particularly recognise two indispensable, wonderful, and
now-missed research assistants with the CQR during the 2021–2022 academic
year, Kia Banks and Josie Rodohan. Additionally, we appreciate the constructive
feedback from Jessica Francombe-Webb on earlier drafts of the introduction.
As another product of the CQR, we are continually inspired by the collective
and conscientious ethos of everyone involved. You can find the CQR on Twitter
@CQRBath or the University of Bath website.
Bryan C. Clift, Ioannis Costas Batlle, Sheree Bekker,
and Katharina Chudzikowski (Editors)
November 2022
INTRODUCTION
The relevance and importance of researcher
vulnerability in qualitative research
Researchers as vulnerable?
Thinking of researchers as vulnerable has received limited attention in the qualita-
tive research process. From the early stages of planning through to the reporting and
lasting presence, qualitative projects more frequently bring considerations of ethics
and risk to the fore more so than vulnerability. Relatedly, risk and vulnerability are
often conflated. Whilst the risk and vulnerability of participants are considered in
some projects, consideration of the vulnerability of the researcher as related to but
distinctive from risk in the process is rarely discussed. Still fewer consider how vul-
nerability can or might be thought of as something more than that which to protect
or guard against, but also as an aspect to embrace, think with, or work with.
Here, we foreground the vulnerability of the qualitative researcher. In doing so,
we suggest that vulnerability is more than a state or condition. Rather, like eth-
ics, risk, or empathy, vulnerability and specifically researcher vulnerability is another
means through which to think about our research, ourselves within it, and where
human participants are involved our relationship with them.
To begin this exploration of vulnerability, we set out to respond to several
questions:
DOI: 10.4324/9781003349266-1