Corticosteroids in IgA Nephropathy 2017 Yajkd
Corticosteroids in IgA Nephropathy 2017 Yajkd
prednisone, 0.5 mg/kg, every other day for 6 months, and azathioprine. However, malignancies developed in 2
approximately half the dose of TESTING. Participants had participants who received cyclophosphamide and
biopsy-proven IgAN, serum creatinine concentrations azathioprine.
≤ 1.5 mg/dL, and proteinuria with protein excretion of 1 Not all participants enrolled in the STOP-IGAN trial
to 3 g/d.3 In comparison to TESTING, there were impor- were at high risk. Rather, patients with proteinuria with
tant differences. All 86 participants were white and had protein excretion > 3.5 g/d or progressive loss of eGFR
serum creatinine concentrations ≤ 1.5 mg/dL. The study were excluded, while participants with proteinuria with
was not discontinued, so median follow-up was 8 years. protein excretion < 1 g/d and mild eGFR decline (mean,
Ten-year renal survival was significantly better in the 4.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 in 3 years, or 1.57 mL/min/
corticosteroid group (n = 12) than the control group 1.73 m2 per year in patients given supportive treatment)
(n = 7; 97% vs 53%; P = 0.0003). Median daily prote- were included. A 3-year follow-up for patients with such a
inuria significantly decreased in the corticosteroid arm slow progression was likely insufficient to detect any
participants, but increased in the control group. One beneficial effect of corticosteroids. Apart from ethnic dif-
steroid-treated participant developed diabetes; no other ferences, it is difficult to compare this study with TESTING
serious side effects were reported. because of the different inclusion criteria and use of
Another Italian multicenter trial randomly assigned cyclophosphamide and azathioprine in the German study.
97 participants with IgAN, proteinuria with protein At any rate, both the STOP-IGAN and TESTING trials had
excretion > 1g/d, and eGFRs > 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 to follow-up durations too short to allow firm conclusions
ramipril alone or to a combined therapy of ramipril and about the efficacy and long-term safety of corticosteroids.
a 6-month course of prednisone (0.8-1 mg/kg/d for 2 While TESTING showed an increased risk for side effects,
months, followed by monthly dose reductions of particularly in the first 3 months of treatment, longer
0.2 mg/kg/d during the next 4 months).4 Combined follow-up would be needed to assess the effects of treat-
treatment increased the probability of not reaching the ment on kidney function. It is a pity that the follow-up of
primary outcome measure of doubling of serum creat- participants already enrolled in TESTING was stopped
inine concentration or end-stage kidney disease (85.2% because it is unlikely that these participants would develop
vs 52.1%; P = 0.003) and significantly reduced pro- other steroid-related side effects after methylprednisolone
teinuria. Adverse events were mild in both groups. The treatment discontinuation, but might still have derived
treatment was somewhat similar to that used in treatment benefit.
TESTING, but no patients with eGFRs < 50 mL/min/
1.73 m2 were included, mean follow-up was 96 What Are the Implications for Nephrologists?
months, and all participants were white. From a clinical perspective, one may wonder whether
In the German STOP-IGAN (Supportive Versus Immu- the benefits of corticosteroids outweigh the risk for side
nosuppressive Therapy for the Treatment of Progressive IgA effects in patients with IgAN. The available RCTs
Nephropathy) trial, 162 participants with persistent pro- reported contradicting conclusions. Two studies
teinuria with protein excretion > 0.75 g/d and concluded that the corticosteroid regimens were effec-
eGFRs ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2 were assigned to supportive tive and well tolerated,3,4 whereas 2 other trials high-
care with RAAS blockers or supportive care plus 3 methyl- lighted the risk for steroid-related side effects.6,10 It is
prednisolone pulses at the start of months 1, 3, and 5 and not surprising that corticosteroids may increase the risk
oral prednisolone, 0.5 mg/kg, every 48 hours.10 Partici- for adverse events, but the high rate of side effects re-
pants with eGFRs between 30 and 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 ported is unexpected. However, in the STOP-IGAN
were given oral prednisolone, 40 mg/d, tapered to 10 mg/ study, not only glucocorticoids, but also cyclophos-
d over the first 3 months of the study, plus cyclophospha- phamide and azathioprine were used. These agents can
mide, 1.5 mg/kg/d, for 3 months, then azathioprine, clearly increase the risk for serious adverse events,
1.5 mg/kg/d, during months 4 through 36. At the end of 3 whereas there is no evidence that azathioprine may add
years of follow-up, 14 participants in the immunosup- benefit when combined with corticosteroids.11 TESTING
pression group had full clinical remission versus 4 in the used high-dose oral methylprednisolone in individuals
supportive care group (P = 0.001). However, there was no already at high risk for side effects, namely with
difference between the 2 groups in the decrease in eGFRs < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and failure to respond to
eGFRs > 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (28% vs 26%). More pa- previous immunosuppression. The true benefit-risk
tients receiving corticosteroid monotherapy than those also balance of corticosteroid use in this high-risk IgAN
given cyclophosphamide and azathioprine had remission of group remains uncertain in the absence of testing its use
proteinuria, hematuria, or both. This result was expected in with concurrent strategies to mitigate anticipated
view of the different eGFRs in the 2 groups. Serious adverse adverse events, such as the use of prophylactic antibi-
events occurred with similar frequency in the 2 study arms otics for serious infectious complications.
(29 vs 33), even considering participants receiving corti- We believe that patients with eGFRs > 30 mL/min/
costeroids alone and those also given cyclophosphamide 1.73 m2 and proteinuria with protein excretion > 1 g/d