trial-protocol
trial-protocol
This protocol template has been designed primarily for Clinical Trials which are subject to the Medicines
for Human use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004, and Amendments. It has been specifically adapted for
non-commercially sponsored studies.
An algorithm is available to help you decide whether or not your trial is a Clinical Trial under the
regulations. This is usually, but not always, sufficiently helpful, especially regarding studies involving
Healthy Volunteers.
See https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/317952/
Algothrim.pdf If you remain unsure about your trial, CTRG or R&D staff will be
happy to advise you.
The template is available for use by all investigators who are carrying out clinical trials sponsored by the
University of Oxford or Oxford University Hospital (OUH) NHS Foundation Trust if they so wish. However,
there is no requirement to do so, provided that an alternative GCP-compliant protocol is used. Other
templates are available, for example, the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for
Interventional Trials) protocol guidelines for minimum protocol content at http://www.spirit-
statement.org/spirit-statement/ or guidance available via the HRA protocol development tool at
https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/research-planning/protocol/
All advisory text and quotations from GCP are highlighted in yellow. These should all be deleted before
finalising the document. All sample text is in ‘basic text’ style. This text of course will be altered or
deleted as required while you produce the draft. Where advisory text regarding <relevant possible
options> is inserted into sample text, delete as needed.
Where a section is not relevant, this should be stated clearly and the section header retained. There may
be instances where rearrangement of the subsections within section 9 is appropriate, in order to match
with the order of trial processes. Instructional text for deletion/rearrangement is highlighted in blue.
Repetition of information throughout the protocol is not necessary; it may be useful to cross-reference
other sections of the protocol to avoid repetition.
Should you require any assistance, contact either CTRG (University) or R&D (NHS) as early as possible in
the planning stage:
https://researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/ctrg
https://www.ouh.nhs.uk/researchers/default.aspx
Trial Title: insert full title including brief reference to the design, disease or condition being studied,
and primary objective
Internal Reference Number / Short title: This should be assigned by the Investigator/department (may
be deleted if not required)
Chief Investigator: Insert name and contact details, including institutional affiliations
(Address of Sponsor)
Chief Investigator Signature: The approved protocol should be signed by author(s) and/or person(s)
authorised to sign the protocol
Statistician Signature:
Confidentiality Statement
This document contains confidential information that must not be disclosed to anyone other than the
Sponsor, the Investigator Team, HRA, host organisation, and members of the Research Ethics Committee
and Regulatory Authorities unless authorised to do so.
For multi-site trials, the Principal Investigator at each site should sign below to document that the
protocol has been read and understood before the protocol is filed in the site ISF. If the same PI covers
more than 1 site both sites might appear here, but otherwise there is no requirement for signatures of
multiple (or all) PI signatures to appear here together.
The undersigned has read and understood the trial protocol detailed above and agrees to conduct the
trial in compliance with the protocol.
Following any amendments to the protocol, this page must be updated with the new protocol version number and
date and re-signed by the site PI.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
To update table of contents, hover cursor over the table and ‘right click’. Choose ‘update field’, then
‘update entire table’.
Chief Investigator Full contact details including phone, email and fax numbers
Funder(s) Names and contact details of all the organisations providing funding
and /or support in kind for this trial.
Clinical Trials Unit Full contact details including phone, email and fax numbers (If
applicable)
Statistician Full contact details including phone, email and fax numbers
2. LAY SUMMARY
It may be useful to include a copy of the lay summary from the IRAS form here. Suggested length, as per
IRAS form A6-1 is 300 words.
3. SYNOPSIS
It may be useful to include a brief synopsis of the trial for quick reference and/or to use as a standalone
document. Complete information and, if required, add additional rows.
Trial Title Please ensure this is in accordance with the title page and the IRAS
form
Internal ref. no. (or Please ensure this is in accordance with the title page and the IRAS
short title) form
Trial registration Trial identifier, registry name, registration number and date of
registration. If not yet registered, name of intended registry.
Sponsor Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/University of Oxford
Delete as appropriate
(Address of Sponsor)
Funder Names and contact details of all the organisations providing funding
and /or support in kind for this trial.
Clinical Phase
Trial Design
Trial Participants
Sample Size
Planned Trial Period Include both the total length of the project and the duration of an
Clinical Trial Protocol Template version 14.0 CONFIDENTIAL
© Copyright: The University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 2018
Page 7 of 37
Date and version No: insert
Secondary
Intervention(s)
4. ABBREVIATIONS
Define all unusual or ‘technical’ terms related to the trial. Add or delete line items as appropriate to your
trial. Maintain alphabetical order for ease of reference.
AE Adverse event
AR Adverse reaction
CI Chief Investigator
CRA Clinical Research Associate (Monitor)
CRF Case Report Form
CRO Contract Research Organisation
CT Clinical Trials
CTA Clinical Trials Authorisation
CTRG Clinical Trials and Research Governance
DMC/DMSC Data Monitoring Committee / Data Monitoring and Safety Committee
DSUR Development Safety Update Report
GCP Good Clinical Practice
GP General Practitioner
Summarise briefly the main characteristics of the disease being studied and any possible opportunity for
better treatment. Include information on the current standard therapy with indication as to why a trial of
a new intervention is needed.
Name, description and characteristics of the investigational medicinal product(s) (may include
mechanism of action). For CTIMPS, indicate if the IMP has or has not a marketing authorisation in the
UK /or in other EU member.
Provide a brief summary of findings from non-clinical studies (if relevant) that potentially have clinical
significance and from other clinical trials relevant to this trial.
Summary of the known and potential risks and benefits, if any, to human participants with a cross
reference to the fuller detail provided in the safety reporting section if required.
Brief description of the rationale for undertaking the trial with justification for the choice of the trial
intervention/IMP(s), and the route of administration, dosage, dosage regimen, and treatment period. If
applicable, include explanation for the choice of comparators also.
References to literature and data that are relevant to the trial and that provide background for the trial.
For early phase studies, clearly state the number of patients who have already received the IMP(s).
The wording of the objectives and outcomes provided below should be clear, unambiguous and as
specific as possible – the trial will be judged on how, and how well, the objectives were satisfied. The
definitions should include specific measurement variables (e.g., systolic blood pressure or Incidence and
severity of adverse events or Disability Rating Index etc.,) analysis metrics (e.g., change from baseline
measurement or time to event etc.,) and, where relevant, the time point for each outcome measure.
Additional more detailed descriptions and definitions of outcomes for all primary and secondary
outcomes may also be provided elsewhere in the protocol (e.g., in the statistics section) with a cross
reference to the summary information here.
Please ensure these are in accordance with those stated in the synopsis above and on the IRAS form.
7. TRIAL DESIGN
Briefly summarise the overall trial design by type of trial (e.g., double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel
design, open labelled, observational) and framework (e.g., superiority, equivalence, non-inferiority,
exploratory). Avoid repetition as full details will be given in later sections.
Briefly summarise the trial setting (e.g., hospitals, GP surgeries, care homes, academic centres etc.)
indicating number of trial sites, types of site (e.g., recruiting, providing intervention, continuing care
etc.,) and, where there are non-UK sites naming the countries where trial data will be collected.
Give the expected duration of participant involvement providing concise details of the number of visits,
including description of the sequence and duration of all trial periods e.g. screening, treatment, and
post-treatment follow-up. Include a chart of the flow of the participant through the study (here, or as an
appendix), if appropriate.
Briefly describe processes for collecting data, and why this method will be used (e.g. type of equipment,
questionnaire, interview schedule, observation schedule). Avoid repetition as full details will be given in
later sections.
8. PARTICIPANT IDENTIFICATION
Example:
Participants with <medical condition> of <xyz> severity and <other symptoms/disease specific criteria>
and/or healthy volunteers aged <insert age>.
Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial.
Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
Diagnosed with required disease/severity/symptoms, any specific assessment criteria for these,
or, if healthy volunteer trial: be in good health.
(alter as required) Stable dose of current regular medication (specify type if needed) for at least
4 weeks prior to trial entry. If healthy volunteer trial: have had no course of medication, whether
prescribed or over-the-counter, in the four weeks before first trial dose and no individual doses
in the final two weeks other than mild analgesia, vitamins and mineral supplements or, for
females, oral contraceptives.
Female participants of child bearing potential and male participants whose partner is of child
bearing potential must be willing to ensure that they or their partner use effective contraception
during the trial and for 3 months thereafter*.
Participant has clinically acceptable laboratory and ECG results (specify any other additional
assessments) within <insert duration> of enrolment.
In the Investigator’s opinion, is able and willing to comply with all trial requirements.
Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of
participation in the trial.
Additional trial specific criteria as required.
* NOTE where the use of effective contraception is a protocol requirement a section on Contraception
and Pregnancy should be added to the safety reporting section with corresponding information in the
Participant Information Sheet.
The participant may not enter the trial if ANY of the following apply:
Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the
trial.
Significant renal or hepatic impairment.
Scheduled elective surgery or other procedures requiring general anaesthesia during the trial.
Participant with life expectancy of less than 6 months, or is inappropriate for placebo
medication.
Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put
the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the
trial, or the participant’s ability to participate in the trial.
Participants who have participated in another research trial involving an investigational product
in the past 12 weeks.
Additional trial specific criteria as required.
Note: ensure each criterion is stated as either an inclusion or an exclusion criterion, but not as both. For
example, it is not necessary to include ‘Male or female aged under 18’ among the example exclusion
criteria above as this is already covered by the inclusion criterion ‘Male or female, aged 18 or above’.
9. TRIAL PROCEDURES
Add a schedule of procedures either here or as an appendix.
9.1. Recruitment
Describe how recruitment centres will be selected.
Describe how potential participants will be identified, approached, screened, and recruited (registered
and /or randomised).
Describe the screening procedures in detail, such as demographics, medical history, concomitant
medication, physical examination, ECG, laboratory tests, biopsies and samples, scans.
If any screening procedures (such as blood sampling) require prior informed consent, then this section
should be moved to between ‘Informed Consent’ and ‘Randomisation’. If participants are first consented
and then registered to the trial for screening purposes before being later randomised to a trial arm, then
place the screening and eligibility section between ‘Informed Consent’ and ‘Registration’. If applicable,
provide details of how the registration procedure relates to the randomisation procedure.
For further details on the ethical considerations of including persons who cannot consent for themselves
see the guidance on the HRA website.
Example:
The participant* must personally sign and date the latest approved version of the Informed Consent
form before any trial specific procedures are performed.
Written and verbal versions of the Participant Information and Informed Consent will be presented to
the participants detailing no less than: the exact nature of the trial; what it will involve for the
participant; the implications and constraints of the protocol; the known side effects and any risks
involved in taking part. It will be clearly stated that the participant is free to withdraw from the trial at
any time for any reason without prejudice to future care, without affecting their legal rights and with no
obligation to give the reason for withdrawal.
The participant will be allowed as much time as wished to consider the information, and the opportunity
to question the Investigator, their GP or other independent parties to decide whether they will
participate in the trial. Written Informed Consent will then be obtained by means of participant dated
signature and dated signature of the person who presented and obtained the Informed Consent. The
person who obtained the consent must be suitably qualified and experienced, and have been authorised
to do so by the Chief/Principal Investigator. A copy of the signed Informed Consent will be given to the
participant. The original signed form will be retained at the trial site.
9.4. Randomisation
If the trial is not randomised include a clear statement to that effect and change the section header to
Registration or Enrolment as appropriate. Provide details of the trial registration procedure here (e.g.,
web-based registration system), notification system and instructions for sites if required.
If applicable, describe how randomisation is going to be carried out for the trial. Specify the method for
generating the randomisation schedule / allocation sequence (e.g., block allocation, simple computer
generated random numbers, stratified randomisation) and include details of how this will be
implemented for the trial (sequentially numbered list, sealed envelopes, telephone or web-based
randomisation system). Where computerised systems are used, will there be need for a paper-based
back up randomisation procedure for use in emergencies?
Specify who will design the randomisation schedule (e.g., statistician, CRO) and who will hold the
allocation code (e.g., pharmacy, independent organisation). Provide details on the timing for
randomisation in terms of the participant’s study schedule. Will randomisation be done at the same visit
as the baseline visit for example, or must participants return for a randomisation visit? Will there be a
run in period? State who will receive notification of a new participant/new randomisation, (e.g., trial
pharmacist at site, site PI, central trial manager) and provide details as to how this will be communicated
to them.
If there is no blinding in the trial, and/or no code breaking procedure, please state that clearly and retain
the section header.
In a blinded trial, specify who it is that is blinded to the allocation; e.g., the participant and/or the
treating clinician; the central research team; the (independent) outcome assessors. Describe the steps
taken to conceal the treatment/intervention allocation from the blinded parties. For example, it may be
necessary that the full details of the method of randomisation not appear in the protocol document, that
such information be held separately and confidentially.
If the clinical condition of a participant necessitates breaking the allocation code, describe the
procedures for this (who will do this, and how). For example, will individual envelopes per participant per
period be supplied so that the code may be broken for a single participant without unblinding the whole
trial? Or will the pharmacist access the randomisation schedule if required by the Investigator and supply
the needed information? Cross reference to the ‘Safety Reporting’ section on SUSAR reporting and
address steps to be taken to conceal the wider randomisation schedule after code-breaking for specific
participants.
Note “it is the opinion of the EMA GCP Inspectors Working Group (GCP IWG) and the Clinical
Trial Facilitation Group (CTFG) that the responsibility to break the treatment code in emergency
situations resides solely with the investigator. Consequently the sponsor <or sponsor delegate> can’t
require or insist on being involved in the decision to unblind, stall or delay in any way the unblinding of
trial subject treatment in emergency situations.”
http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/q_and_a/
q_and_a_detail_000016.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac05800296c5
If out of hours code-breaking will not be required due to the risk level of the IMP, state this and justify
the decision.
If there will only be one visit, this section should be renamed ‘Trial Visit’ and full details of this visit be
included. The next section ‘Subsequent Visits’ can be marked not applicable and the section header
retained.
For each visit, list appropriate assessment, and consider inclusion of the following, where appropriate.
Refer to the trial schedule of procedures (appendix):
eligibility check
assessment of outcome measures
assessments of safety including general (e.g. physical examination), specific safety assessments
(e.g. specific laboratory tests according to the applicable product information and/or population)
and adverse event collection
dispensing of trial drug (and of standard of care drugs, if applicable)
assessment of compliance with trial intervention /trial drugs
recording of concomitant medications
9.8.1 Sample handling for trial purposes (delete subsection header if not required)
9.8.2 Sample handling for tissue bank (delete subsection header if not required)
9.8.3 Sample handling for standard of care (delete subsection header if not required)
In each applicable subsection provide brief details as to how the sample will be processed and stored
once taken; who for example will have access to the samples (i.e. Trial team only for this project, or will it
be stored long-term for use in future ethically approved studies), and duration of storage (destroyed
following local (NHS) analysis; stored for 12 months following end of the study etc.). If the samples will
be transferred to another organisation, state this clearly providing the name of the receiving institution
and the country in which that organisation is situated. Provide an overview of the laboratory analyses
that will be performed. Ensure that the appropriate information is included in the participant
information sheet with corresponding clause(s) on the consent sheet(s). Note, if samples are being
biobanked a separate information sheet and consent form for the biobank is required.
If no samples will be taken, please state that clearly and retain the main section header.
During the course of the trial a participant may choose to withdraw early from the trial treatment at any
time. This may happen for a number of reasons, including but not limited to:
Participant decision
Participants may choose to stop treatment and/or study assessments but may remain on study follow -up.
Participants may also withdraw their consent, meaning that they wish to withdraw from the study
completely. In the case of withdrawal from both treatment and active follow up consider the following
options for a tiered withdrawal from the study. Not all the options may be relevant to your study. The
options elected for use in the study must be covered in the participant information sheet.
According to the design of the trial, participants may have the following three options for withdrawal;
1) Participants may withdraw from active follow-up and further communication but allow the trial
team to continue to access their medical records and any relevant hospital data that is recorded
as part of routine standard of care; i.e., CT-Scans, blood results and disease progression data etc.
2) Participants can withdraw from the study but permit data and samples obtained up until the
point of withdrawal to be retained for use in the study analysis. No further data or samples
would be collected after withdrawal.
3) Participants can withdraw completely from the study and withdraw the data and samples
collected up until the point of withdrawal. The data and samples already collected would not be
used in the final study analysis. (Any limits to this type of withdrawal where, for example analysis
of their data or samples has already been integrated into interim results or dose escalation
decisions etc. should be explained in the participant information sheet).
In addition, the Investigator may discontinue a participant from the trial treatment at any time if the
Investigator considers it necessary for any reason including, but not limited to:
Pregnancy
Ineligibility (either arising during the trial or retrospectively having been overlooked at screening)
Significant protocol deviation
Significant non-compliance with treatment regimen or trial requirements
An adverse event which requires discontinuation of the trial medication or results in inability to
continue to comply with trial procedures
Disease progression which requires discontinuation of the trial medication or results in inability
to continue to comply with trial procedures
Specify what follow up of participants that have withdrawn from treatment will consist of.
Provide justification for any procedures and observations that will be required following a complete
withdrawal (e.g., clinic visits during a safety wash out period) or that will continue to be required of all
participants until the end of the trial; for example, would investigators be required to follow up SAEs
until resolution or end of trial? Ensure that the appropriate information on these arrangements is
included in the participant information sheet.
Wherever possible the data of randomised participants (or registered participants in the case of non-
randomised trials) should be analysed. State whether withdrawal from the trial treatment will result in
exclusion of the data for that participant from certain trial analyses. (Note that intention-to-treat
analyses and analysis of all participants receiving the trial medication (e.g., most safety analyses) may
require admission of data to analysis for participants that are withdrawn from treatment)
State whether or not withdrawn participants will be replaced and describe the conditions and limitations
for this.
The type of withdrawal and reason for withdrawal will be recorded in the CRF.
If the participant is withdrawn due to an adverse event, the Investigator will arrange for follow-up visits
or telephone calls until the adverse event has resolved or stabilised.
If a participant is withdrawn from treatment due to pregnancy the pregnancy will be followed-up to
outcome. See the Safety Reporting section below.
Example:
The end of trial is the point at which all the data has been entered and queries resolved.
Confirm the marketing authorisation status of the IMP (and comparator(s) if applicable).
Briefly describe the comparator and indicate whether it is standard of care and describe how it will be
administered.
Briefly describe the dosage, treatment duration and administration of trial medications.
Briefly describe the dosage form, packaging, and labelling of the trial medication(s) including Qualified
Person (QP) release if applicable.
For labelling requirements, refer to Volume 4. Good Manufacturing Practices, Annex 13. Manufacture of
investigational medicinal products, July 2010.
Where a medication is to be used in its normal indication and standard therapeutic dose, labelling
exemptions may apply. Contact Sponsor for advice.
If there is no blinding of IMPs in the trial, please state that clearly and retain the section header.
https://ec.europa.eu/health//sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-10/imp_03-2011.pdf
Briefly describe the dosage, treatment duration and administration of the NIMP trial medications.
As for IMPs, confirm the risk adapted arrangements for storage, tracking of compliance and
accountability or contraindicated medications
If there are no non-IMPs in the trial design, please state that clearly and retain the section header.
If there are no additional interventions in the trial design, please state that clearly and retain the section
header.
Define the safety reporting window for the trial with a clearly stated starting point (e.g., from time of
consent, from first administration of intervention etc.) and clearly stated end point (e.g.30 days after last
administration of the IMP, point that the participant completes the trial, end of trial). Note the end point
will depend on the nature of the IMP. Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products, for example, have specific
requirements over and above those for most trials and the MHRA and EMA websites should be consulted
for their evolving guidance on ATMPs.
Confirm the limit of investigator follow up of AEs (e.g., follow up until event resolution or stabilisation, to
participant completion of the trial, to trial end etc.). Confirm if the follow up requirement is the same for
all AEs or differs for some events (e.g., follow up until event resolution required for related events only).
Serious Adverse Event A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that:
(SAE)
results in death
is life-threatening
requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing
hospitalisation
results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
consists of a congenital anomaly or birth defect*.
Other ‘important medical events’ may also be considered a serious
adverse event when, based upon appropriate medical judgement, the
event may jeopardise the participant and may require medical or
surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
NOTE: The term "life-threatening" in the definition of "serious" refers
to an event in which the participant was at risk of death at the time of
the event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might
have caused death if it were more severe.
*NOTE: Pregnancy is not, in itself an SAE. In the event that a
participant or his/her partner becomes pregnant whilst taking part in a
clinical trial or during a stage where the foetus could have been
exposed to the medicinal product (in the case of the active substance
or one of its metabolites having a long half-life) the pregnancy should
be followed up by the investigator until delivery for congenital
abnormality or birth defect, at which point it would fall within the
definition of “serious”.
Serious Adverse Reaction An adverse event that is both serious and, in the opinion of the
(SAR) reporting Investigator, believed with reasonable probability to be due
to one of the trial treatments, based on the information provided.
Suspected Unexpected A serious adverse reaction, the nature and severity of which is not
Serious Adverse Reaction consistent with the Reference Safety Information for
(SUSAR) the medicinal product in question set out:
in the case of a product with a marketing authorisation, in the
approved summary of product characteristics (SmPC) for that
product
in the case of any other investigational medicinal product, in the
approved investigator’s brochure (IB) relating to the trial in
question.
NB: to avoid confusion or misunderstanding of the difference between the terms “serious” and “severe”,
the following note of clarification is provided: “Severe” is often used to describe intensity of a specific
event, which may be of relatively minor medical significance. “Seriousness” is the regulatory definition
supplied above.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/common-issues-identified-during-clinical-trial-
applications/useful-resources
Example:
Related: The adverse event follows a reasonable temporal sequence from trial medication
administration. It cannot reasonably be attributed to any other cause.
Not Related: The adverse event is probably produced by the participant’s clinical state or by other
modes of therapy administered to the participant.
Note: where the SAE form used for the trial employs additional options for expressing the probability of
the causal relationship (e.g., definitely related, probably related, possibly related, probably not related
and definitely not related) the binary definitions above may need to be supplemented and/or modified.
If the SAE form includes the option ‘possibly related’ there should be a clear statement of whether
events reported as ‘possibly related’ will be managed as not related or as related i.e., may be assessed as
a SUSAR.
If all (or, all related) non-serious AEs are to be reported on the trial CRF, consider adapting text below as
appropriate:
<All/all related> AEs occurring during the safety window for the trial as defined above that are observed
by the Investigator or reported by the participant, will be reported on the trial CRF, <whether or not
attributed to trial medication>.
The following information will be reported on the CRF: description, date of onset and end date, severity,
assessment of relatedness to trial medication, other suspect drug or device and action taken. Follow-up
information should be provided as necessary.
The severity of events will be assessed on the following scale: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe.
Non-serious AEs considered related to the trial medication as judged by a medically qualified investigator
or the Sponsor will be followed up <either until resolution, or the event is considered stable>.
It will be left to the Investigator’s clinical judgment to decide whether or not an AE is of sufficient severity
to require the participant’s removal from treatment. A participant may also voluntarily withdraw from
treatment due to what he or she perceives as an intolerable AE. If either of these occurs, the participant
must <Insert statement of requirements/conditions here (e.g., undergo an end of trial assessment and
be given appropriate care under medical supervision until symptoms cease, or the condition becomes
stable)>. The statement should be consistent with information specified in section 9.9: Early
Discontinuation/Withdrawal of Participants above, and outlined in the Participant Information Sheet.
All SAEs <other than those defined in this protocol as not requiring reporting> must be reported on the
SAE Reporting Form to the Sponsor or delegate immediately or within 24 hours of Site Study Team
becoming aware of the event being defined as serious.
If relevant: specify if deaths due to the disease under study are exempt from reporting as SAEs (with
instruction as to where in the trial CRF the information about this is captured).
If relevant: specify if disease progression/ relapse/ recurrence are exempt from reporting as SAEs (with
instruction as to where in the trial CRF the information about this is captured).
If this section is not relevant to the trial, please state that clearly and retain the section header.
The processes for receipt, acknowledgement, and review of reported SAEs at the sponsor delegate’s
office should also be outlined.
Specify who will review the SAE once reported to the sponsor delegate and the timelines for this. (e.g.,
pharmacovigilance officer, a local safety committee, nominated clinician, the trial DMC/DMSC). Review
of SAEs must be timely, taking into account the reporting timeline for a potential SUSAR. The SAE review
will include an assessment of expectedness using the Reference Safety Information (RSI) current at the
time of the event.
It must be clear if the assessment of expectedness is completed at the reporting site by the local
investigator or is made centrally by the sponsor delegate (e.g., PV officer, SAE Panel, Local safety
Committee etc.). The design of the trial’s SAE form and any completion guidelines provided to site(s)
should reflect this.
If needed please contact your Sponsor (CTRG/R&D reviewer) for further assistance.
If the trial will be using the University of Oxford /OUH Trial Safety Group, for independent review of
SAEs (if this use is required by or agreed with the trial Sponsor) use the following wording (otherwise
delete):
All SAEs <other than those defined in the protocol as not requiring reporting> must be reported on the
SAE reporting form to <CTRG/R&D> within 24 hours of the Central Study Team becoming aware of the
event. SAEs that are reported late must be accompanied by an explanation for this. <CTRG/R&D> will
perform an initial check of the report and request any additional information from the Central Study
Team. <CTRG/R&D> will ensure the SAE is reviewed by the TSG Medical Monitor on a weekly basis,
(note events reported as related are subject to expedited review procedures). The SAE will also be
reviewed at the next quarterly Trial Safety Group meeting. All SAE information must be recorded on an
SAE form and scanned and emailed, to the Central study team at <insert appropriate email address>. The
central study team are responsible for ensuring that the SAE is reported to <R&D/CTRG> within 24 hours
of awareness of an SAE report. Additional and further requested information (follow-up or corrections to
the original case) will be detailed on a new SAE Report Form and emailed to <CTRG/R&D>.
Delete CTRG or R&D from instances of <CTRG/R&D> in the paragraph above to retain the Sponsor of the
trial. Where Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust is the Sponsor retain ‘R&D’; for University
of Oxford sponsored trials retain ‘CTRG’.
Note: the template SAE form for use by trials using the University of Oxford /OUH Trial Safety Group,
allows for local completion of the assessment of causality AND of expectedness prior to review by the TSG
Medical Monitor.
11.6. Expectedness
Expectedness will be determined according to the approved RSI e.g. in the Investigators’
Brochure/Summary of Product Characteristics. (delete as appropriate, please note some trials may have
both)
Principal Investigators will be informed of all SUSARs for the relevant IMP for all studies with the same
Sponsor, whether or not the event occurred in the current trial.
Either
<Name of Company> will submit DSURs once a year throughout the clinical trial, or on request to the
Competent Authority (MHRA in the UK), Ethics Committee, HRA (where required), Host NHS Trust and
Sponsor.
Or
The CI will submit (in addition to the expedited reporting above) DSURs once a year throughout the
clinical trial, or on request, to the Competent Authority (MHRA in the UK), Ethics Committee, HRA (where
required), Host NHS Trust and Sponsor.
12. STATISTICS
This section should be written by the study statistician.
State whether a Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) is to be produced separately, and if it is then condense the
most relevant information from the SAP sub sections at 12.1 below; otherwise provide full details below
of the planned analyses. The sub-headings given below are suggestions. Sub-headings that are not
applicable may be deleted entirely.
The statistical aspects of the study are summarised here with details fully described in a statistical
analysis plan that will be available from the time <that the first participant is recruited>. The SAP will be
finalised before <any analysis> takes place.
Or
The plan for the statistical analysis of the trial are outlined below. There is not a separate SAP document
in use for the trial.
(delete as appropriate)
Describe the statistical methods to be employed for analysing primary and secondary outcomes. If not
provided elsewhere detailed descriptions and definitions of outcomes for all primary and secondary
outcomes should be provided here including specific measurement variables, analysis metrics and,
where relevant, the time point for each outcome measure. If already described elsewhere, provide cross
reference to the relevant protocol section.
Justify choice of sample size, i.e., how was it determined including reflections on (or calculations of) the
power of the trial, any statistical assumptions or clinical justifications (where for e.g., the sample size was
not arrived at statistically, due to rarity of the disease etc.).
12.8. Procedure for Accounting for Missing, Unused, and Spurious Data.
Briefly describe the procedure(s) to be used for handling of spurious or missing or unused data (e.g. use
of multiple imputation, random effects models or complete case analyses). Describe any possible biases
these techniques may introduce. Cross refer to the Data Management Plan (if applicable).
12.9. Procedures for Reporting any Deviation(s) from the Original Statistical Plan
Detail procedures for reporting any deviation(s) from the original statistical plan (any deviation(s) from
the original statistical plan should be described and justified in protocol and/or in the final report, as
appropriate).
The data management aspects of the study are summarised here with details fully described in the Data
Management Plan.
Or,
The plan for the data management of the study are outlined below. There is not a separate Data
Management document in use for the trial. A justification for not developing a separate detailed DMP
must be provided here. This will be considered by your sponsor during the sponsor review process.
(delete as appropriate)
Example:
Source documents are where data are first recorded, and from which participants’ CRF data are
obtained. These include, but are not limited to, hospital records (from which medical history and
previous and concurrent medication may be summarised into the CRF), clinical and office charts,
laboratory and pharmacy records, diaries, microfiches, radiographs, and correspondence.
CRF entries will be considered source data if the CRF is the site of the original recording (e.g. there is no
other written or electronic record of data). All documents will be stored safely in confidential conditions.
On all trial-specific documents, other than the signed consent, the participant will be referred to by the
trial participant number/code, not by name.
Example:
All trial data will be entered on <to paper CRFs and/or a <<quote software and validation procedure>>.
Note that ICH GCP (Section 5.5) requires that electronic data entry systems are validated and that
Standard Operating Procedures are maintained.
The participants will be identified by a unique trial specific number and/or code in any database. The
name and any other identifying detail will NOT be included in any trial data electronic file.
If no identifiable, personal data will be retained centrally (i.e. by the sponsoring organisation), but rather
this will be held at individual sites only, please state this explicitly.
If your study will collect samples and intends to make further use of these beyond the study, please be
aware that the consent form will need to be retained for the life of the sample to meet HTA traceability
requirements.
If participants are given the option to be approached for future research, please be aware that under
GDPR, it is necessary to retain the consent form as the basis for retention of details and future approach.
Those contact details should be held securely, separately from the research data, and kept updated.
Ensure compliance with the relevant Sponsor organisation’s data policy. For University of Oxford
sponsored trials please refer in particular to the University of Oxford’s
Example:
The trial will be conducted in accordance with the current approved protocol, GCP, relevant regulations
and standard operating procedures. A risk assessment and monitoring plan will be prepared before the
study opens and will be reviewed as necessary over the course of the trial to reflect significant changes
to the protocol or outcomes of monitoring activities.
14.2. Monitoring
Describe arrangements for GCP monitoring
Example:
Regular monitoring will be performed according to the trial specific Monitoring Plan. Data will be
evaluated for compliance with the protocol and accuracy in relation to source documents as these are
defined in the trial specific Monitoring Plan. Following written standard operating procedures, the
monitors will verify that the clinical trial is conducted and data are generated, documented and reported
in compliance with the protocol, GCP and the applicable regulatory requirements. Cross refer to the trial
Risk Assessment and Monitoring Plan documents
Or
If you are using the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust / University of Oxford Trials Safety
Group to centrally review SAEs then the following text should be adapted as appropriate.
The Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust / University of Oxford Trials Safety Group (TSG)
will conduct a review of all SAEs for the trial reported during the quarter and cumulatively. The aims of
this committee include:
To pick up any trends, such as increases in un/expected events, and take appropriate action
To seek additional advice or information from investigators where required
To evaluate the risk of the trial continuing and take appropriate action where necessary
A standard operating procedure should be in place describing the procedure for identifying non-
compliances, escalation to the central team and assessment of whether a non-compliance /deviation
may be a potential Serious Breach
A serious breach is defined as “A breach of GCP or the trial protocol which is likely to affect to a
significant degree –
(a) the safety or physical or mental integrity of the subjects of the trial; or
In the event that a serious breach is suspected the Sponsor must be contacted within 1 working day. In
collaboration with the CI the serious breach will be reviewed by the Sponsor and, if appropriate, the
Sponsor will report it to the REC committee, Regulatory authority and the relevant NHS host organisation
within seven calendar days.
17.3. Approvals
Consider the following example text:
Following Sponsor approval the protocol, informed consent form, participant information sheet <and any
proposed advertising material> will be submitted to an appropriate Research Ethics Committee (REC),
HRA (where required), regulatory authorities (MHRA in the UK), and host institution(s) for written
approval.
The Investigator will submit and, where necessary, obtain approval from the above parties for all
substantial amendments to the original approved documents.
17.5. Reporting
The CI shall submit once a year throughout the clinical trial, or on request, an Annual Progress Report to
the REC, HRA (where required), host organisation, funder (where required) and Sponsor. In addition, an
End of Trial notification and final report will be submitted to the MHRA, the REC, host organisation and
Sponsor.
The study will comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Data Protection Act 2018,
which require data to be de-identified as soon as it is practical to do so. The processing of the personal
data of participants will be minimised by making use of a unique participant study number only on all
study documents and any electronic database(s), <with the exception of the CRF, where participant
initials may be added>. All documents will be stored securely and only accessible by study staff and
authorised personnel. The study staff will safeguard the privacy of participants’ personal data.
For University of Oxford sponsored trials please refer in particular to the University of Oxford’s :
Data Protection Checklist https://researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/policy/data/checklist
Practical Considerations: https://researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/policy/data/practical
Example:
Reasonable travel expenses for any visits additional to normal care will be reimbursed on production of
receipts, or a mileage allowance provided as appropriate.
18.1. Funding
Describe financing arrangements, including all the organisations providing finance and /or support in
kind for this trial.
18.2. Insurance
Describe insurance arrangements.
Non-negligent harm is not covered by the NHS indemnity scheme. The Oxford University NHS Foundation
Trust, therefore, cannot agree in advance to pay compensation in these circumstances.
The University has a specialist insurance policy in place which would operate in the event of any
participant suffering harm as a result of their involvement in the research (Newline Underwriting
Management Ltd, at Lloyd’s of London). NHS indemnity operates in respect of the clinical treatment that
is provided.
The section in red is only to be included if there is a clinical procedure taking place during the trial.
Appropriate contractual arrangements will be put in place with all third parties.
The publication policy should cover authorship, acknowledgements, and review procedures for scientific
publications. If there is a department or institution policy, or agreement, the protocol can refer to it.
Consider describing how trial results may be disseminated to trial participants.
Ensure that the publication policy stated here is consistent with any contract applicable to the trial.
Describe what arrangements the sponsor has in place to protect intellectual property rights.
Ownership of IP generated by employees of the University vests in the University. The protection and
exploitation of any new IP is managed by the University’s technology transfer office, Oxford University
Innovations.
Ownership of IP generated by employees of the OUH vests in OUH. The protection and exploitation of
any new IP is managed by the IP and Research Contracts Team at OUH unless it is generated in
collaboration with the University of Oxford in which case this is led by the University’s technology
transfer office, Oxford University Innovations.
If the section is not applicable state ‘not applicable’ and retain the section header.
21. ARCHIVING
Describe the arrangements for archiving the study including location and duration of storage. These
details should correspond with those provided in the participant information sheet.
22. REFERENCES
Insert references used in text (preferably numbered, or in alphabetical order of first author).
Informed consent
Demographics
Medical history
Concomitant medications
Physical examination
ECG
Laboratory tests
Eligibility assessment
Randomisation
Compliance
<Assessment 1 (describe)>
<Assessment 2 (describe)>
<Assessment 3 (describe)>
<Assessment 4 (describe)>
List details of all protocol amendments here whenever a new version of the protocol is produced. This is
not necessary prior to initial REC / MHRA / HRA submission.
Protocol amendments must be submitted to the Sponsor for approval prior to submission to the REC
committee, HRA (where required) or MHRA.