SECTION 3-TIME RESPONSE-1
SECTION 3-TIME RESPONSE-1
2022/10/04 2
▪ SECTION 1-Introduction to Control Systems
▪ SECTION 2-Mathematical Modelling of Control Systems in
Frequency Domain: Application of Laplace Transform
▪ SECTION 3-Behaviour Analysis of Control Systems: Time
Response of First and Second-order Control Systems
▪ SECTION 4-Reduction of Multiple Subsystems
▪ SECTION 5-Steady-State Errors
▪ SECTION 6-Mathematical Modelling in Time Domain: State-
Space Representation
2022/10/04 3
SECTION 3
TIME RESPONSE OF
FIRST AND SECOND-
ORDER CONTROL
SYSTEMS
2022/10/04 4
LEARNING OUTCOMES
2022/10/04 5
Introduction
▪ In Section 2, we saw how transfer functions can represent
linear, time-invariant systems.
▪ After the engineer obtains a mathematical representation of a
subsystem, the subsystem is analyzed for its transient and
steady-state responses to see if these characteristics yield the
desired behavior.
▪ This chapter is devoted to the analysis of system transient
response.
2022/10/04 6
Introduction
• In time-domain analysis the response of a dynamic system to an
input is expressed as a function of time.
• It is possible to compute the time response of a system if the
nature of input and the mathematical model of the system are
known.
• Usually, the input signals to control systems are not known fully
ahead of time.
• It is therefore difficult to express the actual input signals
mathematically by simple equations.
• The characteristics of actual input signals are a sudden shock, a
sudden change, a constant velocity, and constant acceleration.
• The dynamic behavior of a system is therefore judged and
compared under application of standard test signals – an
impulse, a step, a constant velocity, and constant acceleration.
Another standard signal of great importance is a sinusoidal
signal
Introduction
• The concept of poles and zeros, fundamental to the analysis of and
design of control system, simplifies the evaluation of system
response.
• The poles of a transfer function are:
i. Values of the Laplace Transform variables s, that cause the transfer
function to become infinite.
ii. Any roots of the denominator of the transfer function that are
common to roots of the numerator.
• The zeros of a transfer function are:
i. The values of the Laplace Transform variable s, that cause the
transfer function to become zero.
ii. Any roots of the numerator of the transfer function that are
common to roots of the denominator.
Influence of Poles on Time Response
• The output response of a system is a sum of
i. Forced response
ii. Natural response
a) First-order system
b) Pole plot of the system
First-Order System
• General form:
C (s) K
G(s) = =
R( s ) s + 1
1
G (s) =
RCs + 1
First-Order System
• Transient Response: Gradual change of output from initial to the
desired condition.
• Block diagram representation:
K Where,
R(s) C(s)
s + 1 K : Gain
: Time constant
• By definition itself, the input to the system should be a step
function which is given by the following:
1
R(s) =
s
First-Order System
• General form:
C (s) K
G(s) = = C(s) = G(s) R(s)
R( s ) s + 1
• Output response:
1 K
C ( s ) =
s s + 1
A B
= +
s s + 1
B
c(t ) = A + e −t
First-Order System
• Problem: Find the forced and natural responses for the following
systems
First Order System
• Time constant,
• The time for e-at to decay 37% of its
1
initial value. Or time it takes for the step =
Response to rise to 63% of its final value a
• Rise time, tr
• The time for the waveform to go
2.2
from 0.1 to 0.9 of its final value. tr =
a
• Settling time, ts
• The time for the response to reach,
and stay within 2% of its final value. 4
ts =
a
Transient Response Specifications
• Problem: For a system with the transfer function shown below, find
the relevant response specifications
50
G ( s) =
s + 50
i. Time constant,
ii. Settling time, ts
iii. Rise time, tr
Tutorial
• Roots of denominator:
s 2 + 2 n s + n2 = 0
s1, 2 = − n n 2 − 1
Second-Order System
• Natural frequency, n
• Frequency of oscillation of the system without damping.
• Damping ratio, ς
• Quantity that compares the exponential decay frequency of the
envelope to the natural frequency.
G (s ) = 2
225
s + 30s + 225
• Answer:
G (s ) =
a) 800
2s 2 + 24s + 800
G (s ) = 2
b) 2700
3s + 270s + 2700
G (s ) = 2
225
c) s + 30s + 225
G (s ) = 2
625
d) s + 625
Second-Order System
We Assume that
The inverse Laplace will be
Where
Second-Order System
• Second-order response components generated by complex poles
Second-Order System
• Second-order underdamped responses for damping ratio value
Transient Response Specifications
• Peak time, Tp
• The time required to reach the first Tp = 2
or maximum peak. n 1 −
• Settling time, Ts 4
• The time required for the transient’s Ts =
n
damped oscillation to reach and stay
within ±2% of the steady-state value.
Transient Response Specifications
• Percent overshoot, %OS
• The amount that the waveform overshoots the steady-state, or final
value at peak time, expressed as a percentage of the steady-state
value.
Cmax − Cfinal
%OS = 100
Cfinal
−
c = 1+ e
1+ 2
max
− ( / 1− 2 )
%OS = e 100 %
− ln(%OS / 100)
=
2 + ln 2 (%OS / 100)
Second-Order System
• When 0 < ς < 1, the transfer function is given by the following.
Kn2
G(s ) =
(s + n + jd )(s + n − jd ) Where, d = n 1 − 2
• Pole position:
Second-Order System
• Pole plot for the underdamped second-order system
System Performance
• Percent overshoot versus damping ratio
System Performance
• Lines of constant peak time Tp, settling time Ts and percent
overshoot %OS
a) With constant
real part
b) With constant
imaginary part
System Performance
• Step responses of second-order underdamped systems as poles
move
Cmax = 13.75
Cfinal = 11.25
a) − ln Os − ln 0.12
= = = 0.56
+ ln Os
2 2
+ ln 0.12
2 2
4 4
Ts = = 0.6 n = = 11.9 rad / s
n 0.6 0.56
Ts = = 5 n = = 0.779 rad / s
n 1 − 2
5 1− 2