10.1515 - Arh 2024 0009
10.1515 - Arh 2024 0009
Review Article
Bin Chen, Junjie Xia, Yiwei Lu*, Geping Zhang, Qinghua Liu, Jieming Hu, and Zijian Han
Open Access. © 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2 Bin Chen et al.
The normal bond strength was 0.05, 0.5 and 5 MPa, respec-
tively. The other parameters are standard sample para-
meters. In the biaxial test, the history function in PFC2D
is used to record the macroscopic deviatoric stress–strain
curve during the loading process. As shown in Figure 5,
with the increase in the normal bond strength, the devia- Figure 6: Macroscopic deviatoric stress–strain curves of different tan-
toric stress curve of the sample has a certain fluctuation in gential bond strengths.
both linear and peak strength, but the overall effect is not
significant. strength decreases, but the residual strength after reduction
still has a small increase. Therefore, it can be considered
that the tangential bonding strength between particles has a
2.3.2 Effect of tangential bond strength on the great relationship with the peak and residual strength of the
macroscopic deviatoric stress of the specimen sample.
Figure 5: Macroscopic deviatoric stress–strain curves of different normal Figure 7: Macroscopic deviatoric stress–strain curves of different stiff-
bond strengths. ness ratios.
Evolution characteristics of calcareous sand force chain 5
peak value is higher. Although there is a certain fluctuation the micro-parameters of single particle strength are referred
in the residual stage, the final strength increases with the to the study by Wang et al. [43]).
increase in the stiffness ratio, which shows that the stiff-
ness ratio mainly affects the linear stage of the test curve,
and has a certain impact on the peak and residual strength,
but the impact is not significant. 2.4 Validation of numerical simulation
Figure 8: Macroscopic deviatoric stress–strain curves of different effec- The force chain is the main body to bear the stress.
tive moduli. However, there is no unified definition of force chain at
Confining Effective Normal bonding Tangential bond Stiffness ratio Friction coefficient
pressure (kPa) modulus (MPa) strength (MPa) strength (MPa)
Figure 9: Simulation and test comparison. Figure 10: Particle breakage rate under different confining pressures.
Evolution characteristics of calcareous sand force chain 7
3 Analysis of results
The force is transmitted from one particle to another par-
ticle. This process is visualized and presents a chain struc-
ture, which is intuitively called a force chain [46]. Taking
Figure 11: Force chain identification diagram. (a) B and C are effective 400 kPa as an example, Figures 14 and 15 are the spatial
contact particles. (b) A and C are effective contact particles. (c) B is
evolution of the force chain of the two models under
effective contact particles and A is effective contact particles.
typical strain. It can be seen from Figure 14 that as the
axial load is applied, the force chain mainly appears at
principal stress method to identify the force chain, and the
process of identifying the force chain can be carried out the position (a) adjacent to the loading plate at the initial
stage of loading. In order to resist the external load, the
according to Figures 11 and 12.
force chain gradually derives to the middle part. The long
force chain is gradually highlighted, which is manifested as
the penetration of the force chain, especially in the peak
stage (b). Subsequently, the spatial distribution of the force
chain tends to be stable, which is macroscopically mani-
fested as the hardening of the deviatoric stress. At this
time, the sample is in a critical state of imminent failure.
As the loading progresses, the connected force chain gra-
dually bends and breaks (c) and (d) until the specimen is
destroyed. Through the comparative analysis of the evolu-
tion of the two models, it can be seen that there is almost
no difference in the force chain distribution of the two
models at the initial stage of loading (ℇ = 0.5%), which
shows from the side that the calcareous sand particles
Figure 12: Identifying force chain flow chart. Figure 13: Force chain direction diagram.
8 Bin Chen et al.
Figure 14: The spatial distribution of the force chain under 400 kPa confining pressure of breaking model. (a) ℇ = 0.5%. (b) ℇ = 3%. (c) ℇ = 6%.
(d) ℇ = 8%.
are not broken obviously at the initial stage of loading. occurs near the loading plate, and particle breakage will
When the strain is 3%, the cross-transmission of the force redistribute the stress, resulting in different transmission
chain of the broken model is more serious (the first red modes of the force chain under the two models. By com-
in the figure), while the force chain of the unbroken model paring and analyzing Figures 14 and 15, it can also be found
is mainly transmitted along the quasi-straight line. The that particle breakage will cause the long force chain of the
reason for this phenomenon is that particle breakage first penetrating sample to break and bend (the second red in
Figure 15: The spatial distribution of the force chain under 400 kPa confining pressure of unbroken model. (a) ℇ = 0.5%. (b) ℇ = 3%. (c) ℇ = 6%.
(d) ℇ = 8%.
Evolution characteristics of calcareous sand force chain 9
Figure 16: The probability distribution diagram of the force chain direction under 400 kPa confining pressure of breaking model. (a) ℇ = 0.0%. (b) ℇ =
2%. (c) ℇ = 6%.
the figure), so that the force chain gathers near the loading shape with a large middle and small ends (Figure 16c).
plate, resulting in local stress concentration. Finally, a By comparing and analyzing Figures 11 and 16, it can be
shear fracture zone is gradually formed along the broken seen that the probability of the force chain of the two
part of the force chain. models has undergone different changes after being sub-
In order to more clearly analyze the evolution law of jected to axial load. The force chain probability of the
force chain in the process of deformation and failure of unbroken model is larger in the two angle intervals of
calcareous sand and the influence of particle breakage on [0°, 40°] and [140°, 180°]. This shows that particle breakage
the evolution law of force chain, the probability of force will release the stress originally transmitted to both sides,
chain of two models under typical axial strain is statisti- and the probability of force chain in the main transmission
cally analyzed. By Figure 16(a), before loading, due to the direction will not change. It can also be seen from Figures
influence of confining pressure, the particle system mainly 16 and 17 that the force chains are mainly distributed in the
bears the stress on both sides, so the force chain particles [50°, 70°] and [110°, 130°] angle ranges. In order to obtain
are mainly distributed in the two angle ranges of [0°, 10°] the relationship between the microscopic force chain prob-
and [170°, 180°]. With the application of axial load, the ability and the macroscopic deviatoric stress, the evolution
internal stress of the sample is rapidly redistributed. In of the force chain probability and the deviatoric stress with
order to resist the external load together, the particle the axial strain in each characteristic angle direction is
system will spontaneously choose the path with higher compared and analyzed.
strength, but the main transfer path will still be along From Figure 18, with the increase in axial strain, the
the loading direction. Therefore, the force chain quickly probability of force chain in each characteristic angle
moves closer to the axial direction. Due to the irregular interval changes significantly with axial strain. The prob-
shape and uneven stress of calcareous sand, the particles ability of force chain in the interval of [50°, 70°] and [110°,
in contact with the loading plate are stressed at the edges 130°] is consistent with the change in macroscopic devia-
and corners, and the stress is transmitted along the path toric stress with strain, while the probability of force chain
with the highest strength. The probability of the force in the two adjacent intervals of [0°, 40°] and [140°, 180°] is
chain in this direction rises rapidly in Figure 16(b), and opposite to the development of macroscopic deviatoric stress.
then the probability of the force chain in this direction In addition, by comparing and analyzing Figures 10 and 18, it
continues to increase, and the probability of the force can be found that the more serious the particle breakage is,
chains on both sides continues to decrease, showing a the greater the probability attenuation of the force chain
Figure 17: The probability distribution diagram of force chain direction under 400 kPa confining pressure of non-breaking model. (a) ℇ = 0.0%. (b) ℇ =
2%. (c) ℇ = 6%.
10 Bin Chen et al.
Figure 20: Failure modes under different confining pressures. (a) 100
kPa. (b) 200 kPa. (c) 400 kPa.
chain in the direction of the potential shear band, resulting sample to break and bend, resulting in local stress con-
in an increase in the probability of the force chain in this centration, and finally a shear fracture zone is gradu-
direction. The faster the force chain grows, the more ally formed along the broken part of the force chain.
obvious the X-type shear band is. The shear band appears (2) The fundamental reason for the hardening of the
in the adjacent interval with more axial force chains. deviatoric stress of calcareous sand is that the particle
It can be seen from the above analysis that in the process breakage reduces the force chain on both sides of the
of biaxial compression, the probability of axial force chain axial direction, forcing the axial force chain to rise
([50°, 70°], [110°, 130°]) increases gradually, and the corre- steadily. The deviatoric stress is the external manifes-
sponding macroscopic deviatoric stress increases, both of tation of the probability of the axial force chain on the
which reach the peak at the same time. After that, the meso level.
probability of axial force chain and the deviatoric stress (3) The shear band appears in the adjacent interval of the
rise steadily. Due to the continuous increase in the macro- larger force chain, and the faster the probability of the
scopic deviatoric stress, the shear band is not obviously force chain in the direction of the shear band increases,
formed. In order to resist the external load, the force chain the more obvious the shear band is.
in the direction of the potential shear band is increasing. It
can be seen from the above analysis that in the process of Acknowledgements: The authors are thankful to the tea-
biaxial compression, the probability of axial force chain ([50°, chers of Xiangtan University for their help and guidance.
70°], [110°, 130°]) increases gradually, and the corresponding
macroscopic deviatoric stress increases, both of which reach Funding information: This study was supported by the
the peak at the same time. After that, the probability of axial National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 42207227;
force chain and deviatoric stress increase steadily, due to the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, No.
increase in deviatoric stress on the macro level. Particle 2022JJ40586; the National Construction of High-level University
breakage plays an important role in the evolution of force Public Postgraduate project No. 202306710072.
chain. The specific performance is that particle breakage
causes the long force chain of the penetrating sample to break Author contributions: Bin Chen: writing – original draft,
and crack. The fundamental reason for the hardening of devia- methodology, data curation, and conceptualization. Junjie
toric stress is that particle breakage reduces the force chain on Xia: validation, supervision, and conceptualization. Yiwei
both sides of the axial direction, forcing the axial force chain to Lu: resources, funding acquisition, and conceptualization.
rise steadily. The deviatoric stress is the external manifestation Geping Zhang: visualization, data curation, and conceptua-
of the probability of axial force chain on the meso level. lization. Qinghua Liu: visualization and validation. Jieming
Hu: software and data curation. Zijian Han: validation and
conceptualization.
[3] Dantu P. A contribution to the mechanical and geometrical study [25] Zhao Y, Luo S, Wang Y, Wang W, Zhang L, Wan W. Numerical analysis
of non-cohesive masses. In Proceedings of the 4th International of karst water inrush and a criterion for establishing the width of
Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering. water-resistant rock pillars. Mine Water Environ. 2017;36(4):508–19.
London: Butterworths Scientific Publications; 1957. p. 144–8. [26] Yu W, Li K, Liu Z, An B, Wang P, Wu H. Mechanical characteristics
[4] Pei-Jun GUO. Critical length of force chains and shear band thick- and deformation control of surrounding rock in weakly cemented
ness in dense granular materials. Acta Geotech. 2012;7:41–55. siltstone. Environ Earth Sci. 2021;80:1–15.
[5] Fu LL, Zhou SH, Tian ZY, Tian ZK. Evolution of force chain in granular [27] Cil MB, Buscarnera G. DEM assessment of scaling laws capturing
materials under biaxial compression. Rock Soil Mech. the grain size dependence of yielding in granular soils. Granul
2019;40(6):2427–34. Matter. 2016;18(3):1–15.
[6] Chen W, Wan W, Zhao Y, Peng W. Experimental study of the crack [28] Yuan Z, Zhao J, Li S, Jiang Z, Huang F. A unified solution for surrounding
predominance of rock-like material containing parallel double fis- rock of roadway considering seepage, dilatancy, strain-softening and
sures under uniaxial compression. Sustainability. 2020;12(12):5188. intermediate principal stress. Sustainability. 2022;14(13):8099.
[7] Zou S, Li K, Han Q, Yu CW. Numerical simulation of the dynamic [29] Peng Y, Liu G, Wu L, Zuo Q, Liu Y, Zhang C. Comparative study on
formation process of fog-haze and smog in transport tunnels of a tunnel blast-induced vibration for the underground cavern group.
hot mine. Indoor Built Environ. 2017;26(8):1062–9. Environ Earth Sci. 2021;80:1–13.
[8] Dai S, Gong Y, Wang F, Hu P. Diagenesis evolution of tight sand- [30] Chen C, Peng Z, Gu J, Peng Y, Huang X, Wu L. Exploring environmen-
stones in Chang 8 Member of Upper Triassic in the Xiasiwan area, tally friendly biopolymer material effect on soil tensile and compressive
Ordos Basin, China. Fresenius Environ Bull. 2019;28(8):6275–81. behavior. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(23):9032.
[9] Jia-Ming Z, Lin Z, Guo-Sheng J, Ren W. Research on particle crushing [31] Yang G, Xu J, Liu K. Numerical simulation study on particle crushing
of calcareous sands under triaxial shear. Rock Soil Mech. of coarse aggregates. Rock Soil Mech. 2015;36(11):3301–6.
2008;29(10):2789–93. [32] Liu S, Nie Y, Hu W, Ashiru M, Li Z, Zuo J. The influence of mixing
[10] Sun C, Sun M, Tao T, Qu F, Wang G, Zhang P, et al. Chloride binding degree between coarse and fine particles on the strength of off-
capacity and its effect on the microstructure of mortar made with shore and coast foundations. Sustainability. 2022;14(15):9177.
marine sand. Sustainability. 2021;13(8):4169. [33] Huang Z, Zhang L, Yang Z, Zhang J, Gao Y, Zhang Y. Preparation and
[11] Chen B, Hu JM. Fractal behavior of coral sand during creep. Front properties of a rock dust suppressant for a copper mine. Atmos
Earth Sci. 2020;8:134. Pollut Res. 2019;10(6):2010–7.
[12] Li S, Jia Z, Ye Q. Study on dynamic response of damper under gas [34] Lei XW, Ding H, Wang XZ, Shen JH, Men QS. Experimental study on
explosion impact. Sustainability. 2023;15(4):3356. consolidation characteristics of calcareous silt. Rock Soil Mech.
[13] Liu C, Wang R. Effects of particle crushing on mechanical properties 2021;42(4):909–20.
of calcareous soils. Rock Soil Mech. 2002;23(s):2789–93. [35] Chen H, Wang R, Li J, Zhang J. Shape analysis of calcareous sand
[14] Sun C, Sun M, Tao T, Qu F, Wang G, Zhang P, et al. Chloride-binding particles. Rock Soil Mech. 2005;26(9):1389–92.
capacity of mortars composed of marine sand subjected to external [36] Shao L, Chi SC, Zhang Y, Tao JY. Triaxial shear test of rockfill based
chloride penetration. J Oceanol Limnol. 2022;40(4):1462–71. on particle flow. Rock Soil Mech. 2013;34(3):711–20.
[15] Liu J, Liu Z, Jiang G. Stress evolution in linear cutting tests: Laboratory [37] Deng S, Zheng Y, Feng L, Zhu P, Ni Y. Application of design of
and numerical methods. Sustainability. 2022;14(18):11733. experiments in microscopic parameter calibration for hard rocks of
[16] Liu C, Wang R. Grain breakage evaluation of calcareous sand in triaxial PFC3D model. Chin J Geotech Eng. 2019;41(4):655–64.
shearing and its energy formula. Chin J Eng Geol. 1999;7(4):366–71. [38] Chen P, Yu H. Relationship between macroparameters of flat-
[17] Guo X, Jia Z, Ye Q. Numerical study on influence of wall thermal effect jointed bonded-particle material and calibration of macropara-
on thermal impact of gas explosion. Sustainability. 2023;15(10):7792. meters. J Chongqing Jianzhu Univ. 2016;38(5):74–84.
[18] Ye Z, Zhang L, Zhou Z, Pan K, Liu X, Liu W, et al. Mechanical prop- [39] Gu X, Huang M, Qian J. Discrete element modeling of shear band in
erties of the combination of surrounding rock and primary support granular materials. Theor Appl Fract Mech. 2014;72:37–49.
under impacting load. Sustainability. 2023;15(5):4410. [40] Wu S-C, Zhang X-P, Liu Y. Analysis of failure process of similar soil
[19] Yu W, Guo H, Li K, Pan B. Experimental study on uniaxial com- slope with weak intercalated layer based on particle flow simula-
pression mechanics and failure characteristics of non-through tion. Rock Soil Mech. 2008;29(11):2899–904.
fractured rock. Sustainability. 2023;15(6):4968. [41] Sun J, He P, Qi M. Parameter calibration of discrete element
[20] Yang C. Research progress on the crushing of calcareous sand numerical simulation of particle flow software PFC. Shandong Ind
particles. J Wuyi Univ (Nat Sci Ed). 2020;34(1):52–7. Technol. 2016;10:42.
[21] He Y, Chen Q. Construction and application of LSTM-based pre- [42] Lv Y, Hu J, Zhang D, Wang Y, Su Y. Particle breakage of calcareous
diction model for tunnel surrounding rock deformation. sand from low-high strain rates. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 2024.
Sustainability. 2023;15(8):6877. [43] Wang G, Yang J, Wang Z. Analysis on evolution law of critical state
[22] Zhao Y, Liu Q, Lin H, Wang Y, Tang W, Liao J, et al. A review of of calcareous sand with particle breakage. Chin J Geotech Eng.
hydromechanical coupling tests, theoretical and numerical ana- 2021;43(8):1511–7.
lyses in rock materials. Water. 2023;15(13):2309. [44] Cheng S, Zhu C, Shan H, Liu X, Jia Y. Shear deformation simulation
[23] Zhao Y, Tang J, Chen Y, Zhang L, Wang W, Wan W, et al. of soft clay in the South China Sea based on discrete elements. Sci
Hydromechanical coupling tests for mechanical and permeability Technol Eng. 2020;20(9):3707–14.
characteristics of fractured limestone in complete stress–strain [45] Peters JF, Muthuswamy M, Wibowo J, Tordesillas A.
process. Environ Earth Sci. 2017;76:1–18. Characterization of force chains in granular material. Phys Rev E.
[24] Zhang L, Nguyen NGH, Lambert S, Nicot F, Prunier F, Djeran- 2005;72:041307–1–8.
Maigre I. The role of force chains in granular materials: from statics [46] Cates ME, Wittmer JP, Bouchaud JP, Claudin P. Jamming, force
to dynamics. Eur J Environ Civ Eng. 2017;21(7–8):874–95. chains and fragile matter. Phys Rev Lett. 1998;81(9):1841–4.