Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

Document prepared by:

Gawad Saka National Executive
and Technical Committee
through the
National Secretariat
Agricultural Training Institute (ATI)
2024
ATI Building, Elliptical Road, Diliman, Quezon City
City Telefax: (632) 929-8541 loc 250
e-mail: [email protected]
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Rationale 1
II. Objectives 1
III. Agencies Involved 2
IV. Scope 3
V. Committees Involvement and Roles 3
VI. Categories vis-à-vis Chair Agency Involved 5
VII. Board of Judges Selection 7
VIII. Search and Evaluation Procedure 9
IX. Search Rules and Regulations 10
X. Qualifications of the Nominee 10
XI. Documentary Requirements 10
XII. Budgetary Requirements 10
XIII. Awarding 11
XIV. Annexes (Guidelines per category)
Annex 1 – Rice Cluster – Irrigator’s Associations for National Irrigation
System (NIS) and Communal Irrigation System (CIS)
-Small Water Irrigation System Associations
Annex 2 - Corn Farmer
Annex 3 - Corn Cluster
Annex 4 - Cassava Cluster
Annex 5 – Coconut Farmer
Annex 6 – Coconut Farmer Organization
Annex 7 – Sugarcane Farmer
Annex 8 – High Value Crops Farmer (Vegetables, Fruits, Plantation Crops)
Annex 9 – High Value Crops Cluster
Annex 10 – Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Garden (Macrogarden,
Microgarden)
Annex 11 – Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System
Annex 12 – Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System
Annex 13 – Dairy Carabao Raiser (Smallhold, Family Module, Semi-
Commercial, Commercial)
Annex 14 – Dairy Cattle and Goat Raiser
Annex 15 – Fisherfolk (Fish Capture)
Annex 16 – Fisherfolk (Aquaculture)
Annex 17 – Farm and Fisherfolk Family
Annex 18 – Rural Improvement Club
Annex 19 – Small Farmer or Fisherfolk Organization
Annex 20 – Agricultural and Fisheries Councils (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)
Annex 21 – KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)
Annex 22 – KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)
Annex 23 – City/Municipal Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management
Council
Annex 24 – Local Government Unit (Provincial, Municipal, and City)
Annex 25 – Agricultural Scientist
Annex 26 – Agricultural Researcher
Annex 27 – Agricultural Extension Manager
Annex 28 – Agricultural Extension Worker
Annex 29 – Young Farmer or Fisherfolk
Annex 30 – Young Farmer or Fisherfolk Organization
Annex 31 – Agricultural Entrepreneur (Micro, Small, Medium Enterprise)
Annex 32 – Rural Financial Institution (Bank and Non-Bank)
Annex 33 – Outstanding Rural Women
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

LIST OF TABLES

Table A. Categories vis-à-vis Chair Agency Involved 5

Table B. Criteria for Selection of BOJ 7
Table C. Number of BOJ per subcategory 7

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure A. 2025 Gawad Saka Search and Evaluation Process Flow 9

Figure B. 2025 Timeline of Activities 11
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

I. RATIONALE

Agriculture is one of the cornerstones of the Philippines’ economy, providing sustenance

and livelihood to 155,221 Filipinos (PSA, 2024). With this, the government has accorded
highest priority to the development of the agriculture and fisheries sector. It has also
expanded development and opportunities across the value chain towards the country’s
pursuit of Masaganang Agrikultura at Maunlad na Ekonomiya Patungo sa Bagong Pilipinas.

Following a period of uncertainty, instability, and recovery brought about by the COVID-
19 pandemic, the Department of Agriculture (DA) continues to transform agrifood systems
and enhanced its efforts to implement more responsive programs and projects amidst the
complexities of the modern world.

With this, the Gawad Saka: Parangal sa mga Natatanging Magsasaka at Mangingisda was
reactivated to continuously honor the outstanding contributions of Filipino farmers,
fisherfolk, and animal raisers, along with compassionate and competent public servants in
the agriculture and fisheries workforce, who demonstrated sustained and exemplary
performance in the advancement of the agriculture and fisheries sector. Gawad Saka (GS), as
the most prestigious award-giving search, is likewise the sole award-giving body of the DA in
support to all programs being implemented towards attaining sustainable and pronounced
positive effects to the Filipino people.

To commemorate the 50th Gawad Saka: Parangal sa mga Natatanging Magsasaka at

Mangingisda in 2025, the regional search process and regional awarding ceremony will be
temporarily suspended. Regional nominees will instead be directly endorsed by their
respective Regional Executive Directors at the DA-Regional Field Office for evaluation at the
national level. Starting in subsequent years of the search, the standard regional search
procedure will be reinstated.

Thus, this revised general guideline harmonized the screening, evaluation, validation, and
related processes involved in the Gawad Saka.

II. OBJECTIVES

The Gawad Saka Search aims to recognize the outstanding contributions of individuals,
groups, and organizations who demonstrated sustained and exemplary performance in the
advancement of the agriculture and fisheries sector.
Specifically, the Search aims to:
a. Honor and give tribute to the outstanding performers in agriculture and
fisheries;
b. Serve as inspiration and model for others through promotion and dissemination
of the outstanding winners’ success stories and best practices;
c. Enhance the technologies, improve the productivity, and empower the
outstanding winners by providing them incentives; and
d. Support the agricultural and fisheries programs and plans of the DA.

1
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

III. AGENCIES INVOLVED

ACPC Agricultural Credit Policy Council

AFID Agriculture and Fisheries Information Division
AMAS Agribusiness and Marketing Assistance Service
ATI Agricultural Training Institute
BAI Bureau of Animal Industry
BAR Bureau of Agricultural Research
BFAR Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources
BPI Bureau of Plant Industry
BSWM Bureau of Soil and Water Management
CDA Cooperative Development Authority
DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DILG-BLGS Department of the Interior and Local Government - Bureau of Local
Government Supervision
F2C2 Farm and Fisheries Clustering and Consolidation
FOS Field Operations Service
FPCMD Field Programs Coordination and Monitoring Division
GAD FPS Gender and Development Focal Point System
HVCDP High-Value Crops Development Program
IMO Irrigation Management Office
ISU Isabela State University
LCP League of Municipalities of the Philippines
NCP National Corn Program
NDA National Dairy Authority
NFA National Food Authority
NFARMC National Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council
NFRDI National Fisheries Research and Development Institute
NIA National Irrigation Administration
NMIS National Meat Inspection Service
NRP National Rice Program
NUPAP National Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Program
NVSU Nueva Vizcaya State University
OASCA Office of the Assistant Secretary for Consumer Affairs
OURID Office of the Undersecretary for Rice Industry Development
PAA Philippine Association of Agriculturists Inc.
PCAF Philippine Council for Agriculture and Fisheries
PCAF Philippine Coconut Authority
PCC Philippine Carabao Center
PDS Project Development Service
PhilEASNet Philippine Extension and Advisory Services Network, Inc.
PhilFIDA Philippine Fiber Industry Development Authority
PHilMech Philippine Center for Postharvest Development and Mechanization
PhilRice Philippine Rice Research Institute
PNVSA Philippine National Volunteer Service Coordinating Agency
SRA Sugar Regulatory Administration
UHVC Undersecretary for High-Value Crops
USECO Undersecretary for Operations and Agri-Fisheries Mechanization

2
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

IV. SCOPE

The Search is open to all Filipino citizens nationwide contributing in the development of
the agriculture and fisheries sector. It is open to individuals, organizations, and institutions
depending on the category.

V. COMMITTEES INVOLVEMENT AND ROLES

The following Committees are created to ensure successful implementation of the Gawad
Saka through the issuance of a special order, along with their roles and responsibilities in the
award process:

A. National Executive Committee

• Set goals, objectives, and policies to ensure that Gawad Saka remains relevant
undertaking in changing agri-socio-economic landscape;
• Ensure that the Search process, categories, and the criteria for the basis of selection
are indicative of the reasons of conducting the Search;
• Organize and mobilize various NTC for the various categories and the Regional
Search Committee for the conduct of the Search at the Regional evel;
• Identify, invite, and brief members of the Board of Judges who shall conduct the final
review and evaluation of the finalists and select from among the Gawad Saka
National Winners; and
• Undertake other activities necessary to attain the objectives of GS.

B. National Technical Committee

• Screen regional nominees and select at least three (3) top nominees for each
assigned category/subcategory for national judging, should there be less than
three (3) nominees, the NTC shall decide;
• The NTC Chairperson shall request the Head of the Agency of the person to be part
of the NTC Composition. The NTC Chair shall submit the recommended
composition to the NEC for the preparation of the Special Order for the Approval
of the Secretary;
• Form and deploy Validating Team for each assigned category/subcategory to
confirm veracity of information on nominees. The total composition of the Field
Validating Team should at least the majority of the members (50% + 1). All field
validation schedules must first be submitted to the National Secretariat for
coordination. Only schedules cleared by the National Secretariat will be
recognized by the Regional Search Committee;
• Present to the National Executive Committee and the Board of Judges the results
of the screening and field validation; and
• Recommend to the NEC the composition of the Board of Judges.

3
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

C. National Secretariat
• Provide administrative and technical support to the NEC and the BOJ;
• Organize and make necessary arrangements for the NEC and BOJ meetings, and
other activities;
• Prepare the minutes of the meetings and deliberation of the NEC and BOJ;
• Act as channel for communication and coordination among the NECs, NTCs, BOJs,
and other relevant bodies;
• Arrange the implementation of the decisions arising from these meetings;
• Serve as a clearing house for the scheduling of all field validation activities of the
NTCs;
• Maintain and share institutional memory of GS (be the repository of important
information/documents of GS);
• Facilitate the Awarding Ceremony; and
• Perform other functions assigned by the NEC.

D. Regional Search Committee

• Ensure that the regional search is conducted in pursuant to Gawad Saka objectives
and in accordance with the Search guidelines;
• Organize and mobilize their respective Regional Technical Committees;
• Endorse the nominees of their respective category/subcategory to the NEC; and
• Screen regional nominees and select the top nominee for each
category/subcategory for evaluation at the national level.

The DA Regional Executive Director (DA-RED) and the Regional Agricultural and
Fishery Council (RAFC) Chairman shall jointly organize the Regional Search Committees
(RSCs). The composition of the RSCs shall include the RED, RAFC Chair, equivalent of the
DA Bureaus and attached agencies, and technical staff and coordinators of the DA Banner
Programs. The BFAR-RFO, the PCA and the SRA shall lead in the Regional Technical
Committees (RTC) for Fisheries, Coconut and Sugar Categories, respectively, while NIA
and BSWM Soil and Water Access Team (SWAT) shall lead for the Rice Cluster. DA-RED
shall endorse the regional nominees for evaluation of the National Executive and
Technical Committees at the national level.

E. Support Committee

The key committees involved for the support functions, especially during the
awarding ceremony, are the Publicity and Editorial Committee, and Transportation
Committee. Their respective roles are outlined as follows:

1. Publicity and Editorial Committee

• Facilitate the development and publication of publicity materials across
various digital platforms including websites, and social media; and
• Facilitate proper documentation including photos, videos, and other written
reports; and
• Perform other functions assigned by the NEC.

4
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

2. Transportation Committee
• Organize and arrange transportation for winners, committee members,
officials, and other attendees to and from the awarding venue;
• Manage other logistical aspects of the award ceremony as needed; and
• Perform other functions assigned by the NEC.

VI. CATEGORIES VIS-À-VIS CHAIR AGENCY INVOLVED

The GS is conducted nationwide by DA and attached agencies, in coordination with the

DA- Regional Field Offices.

Through the issuance of the Special Order No. 1462 Series of 2024 on the Creation of the
2025 Gawad Saka National Executive, Technical, and Support Committees, per committee
composition was determined. The Chairperson of each category/subcategory came from the
identified lead agency. Furthermore, the 50th Gawad Saka will feature a total of nine (9)
main categories encompassing 47 subcategories.

Table A. Categories vis-à-vis Chair Agency Involved

Category Chair
Agency/Office
1. Crops
a. Rice Cluster – Irrigator’s Associations for NIS and CIS OURID
b. Rice Cluster - Small Water Irrigation System Associations OURID
c. Corn Farmer NCP
d. Corn Cluster NCP
e. Cassava Cluster NCP
f. Coconut Farmer PCA
g. Coconut Cluster PCA
h. Sugarcane Farmer SRA
i. High-Value Crops Farmer – Vegetables HVCDP
j. High-Value Crops Farmer – Fruits HVCDP
k. High-Value Crops Farmer – Plantation Crops HVCDP
l. High-Value Crops Cluster HVCDP
m. Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Garden (Microgardens) NUPAP
n. Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Garden (Macrogardens) NUPAP

2. Livestock
a. Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System BAI
b. Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System NMIS
c. Dairy Goat Raiser NDA
d. Dairy Cattle Raiser NDA
e. Dairy Carabao Raiser - Smallhold PCC
f. Dairy Carabao Raiser - Family Module PCC
g. Dairy Carabao Raiser - Semi-Commercial PCC
h. Dairy Carabao Raiser - Commercial PCC

5
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

3. Fisheries
a. Fisherfolk (Aquaculture) BFAR
b. Fisherfolk (Fish Capture) BFAR

4. Institutions I
a. Farm and Fisherfolk Family BSWM
b. Rural Improvement Club BSWM
c. Small Farmer or Fisherfolk Organization ATI
d. Provincial/Highly Urbanized City/ Independent Component City PCAF
e. Municipal/City Agricultural and Fishery Council PCAF
f. KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise) AMAS
g. KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (Local AMAS
Government Unit)

5. Institutions II
a. City/Municipal Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management BFAR
Council
b. Provincial Local Government Unit ATI
c. City Local Government Unit ATI
d. Municipal Local Government Unit ATI

6. Agricultural Scientist and Researcher

a. Agricultural Scientist BAR
b. Agricultural Researcher BAR

7. Agricultural Extension Manager and Worker

a. Agricultural Extension Manager ATI
b. Agricultural Extension Worker ATI

8. Youth
a. Young Farmer or Fisherfolk ATI
b. Young Farmer or Fisherfolk Organization ATI

9. Cross-Cutting
a. Agricultural Entrepreneur (Micro Enterprise) AMAS
b. Agricultural Entrepreneur (Small Enterprise) AMAS
c. Agricultural Entrepreneur (Medium Enterprise) AMAS
d. Rural Institution (Bank) ACPC
e. Rural Financial Institution (Non-Bank) ACPC
f. Rural Women GAD FPS

The chair agency/office identified shall cover the cost of supplies, snacks, or meals during
their respective committee meetings. Meanwhile, travel expenses incurred by each NTC member
for the Gawad Saka Search, especially during the field validation, shall be chargeable to their
respective office funds, subject to existing accounting and auditing rules and regulations.
However, for NTC members outside the agency, these expenses shall be charged to the NTC
Chair’s Office.

6
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

VII. BOARD OF JUDGES SELECTION

The Board of Judges (BOJ) will be composed of highly competitive pool of experts in the
field of agriculture and fisheries sector. The role of the BOJs is important in the Search for
their decision is irrevocable and final. Refer to Table B for the criteria of selection of BOJ.

Table B. Criteria for Selection of BOJ

Criteria Qualification
Educational Attainment at least College Graduate

Experience accomplished and recognized

individual in
his/her field of specialization
Previous Gawad Saka National Awardees

*Selected BOJ must possess at least two (2) of the criteria

Each National Technical Committee recommends experts for the approval of the National
Executive Committee. The BOJ may be selected from the Government and/or Private Sectors
across Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao, however, representation from all areas is not required.
The BOJ shall also not be selected from the State, Universities, and Colleges (SUCs) where the
nominees come from. The number of BOJ for each category is presented in Table C.

Table C. Number of BOJ per category/subcategory

Categories Subcategories Number of BOJ
Crops 18
Rice Outstanding Rice Cluster – Irrigator’s 3
Associations for National Irrigation System
(NIS) and Communal Irrigation System (CIS)
Outstanding Rice Cluster – Small Water 3
Irrigation System Associations
Corn Outstanding Corn Farmer 3
Outstanding Corn Cluster
Cassava Outstanding Cassava Cluster
Coconut Outstanding Coconut Farmer 3
Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization
Sugarcane Outstanding Sugarcane Farmer 3
High-Value Crops Outstanding High-Value Crops Farmer – 3
Vegetable
Outstanding High-Value Crops Farmer –
Fruits
Outstanding High-Value Crops Farmer –
Plantation Crops
Outstanding High-Value Crops Cluster
Urban and Peri-Urban Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban 3
Agriculture Agriculture Garden (Microgarden)

7
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

Categories Subcategories Number of BOJ

Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban
Agriculture Garden (Macrogarden)
Livestock 9
Small Animal Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting 3
Integrating Farming System
Large Animal Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting 3
Integrating Farming System

Dairy Goat Outstanding Dairy Goat Raiser

Dairy Cattle Outstanding Dairy Cattle Raiser 3
Dairy Carabao Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raiser
(Smallhold, Family Module, Semi-
Commercial, Commercial)
Fisheries 6
Outstanding Fisherfolk (Aquaculture) 3
Outstanding Fisherfolk (Fish Capture) 3
Institution I 15
Outstanding Farm and Fisherfolk Family 3
Outstanding Rural Improvement Club 3
Outstanding Small Farmer or Fisherfolk Organization 3
Outstanding Municipal or City Agricultural and Fisheries Council 3
Outstanding Provincial/Highly Urbanized City/ Independent
Component City Agricultural and Fisheries Council
Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise) 3
Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer
(Local Government Unit)
Institution II 10
Municipal/City Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council 3
Outstanding Provincial Local Government Unit 7
Outstanding Municipality Local Government Unit
Outstanding City Local Government Unit
Agricultural Scientist and Researcher 6
Outstanding Agricultural Scientist 3
Outstanding Agricultural Researcher 3
Agricultural Extension Manager and Worker 3
Youth 3
Cross-Cutting 9
Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur (Micro Enterprise) 3
Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur (Small Enterprise)
Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur (Medium Enterprise)
Outstanding Rural Financial Institution (Bank) 3
Outstanding Rural Financial Institution (Non-Bank)
Outstanding Rural Women 3
TOTAL 79

BOJ shall be entitled to honorarium, transportation expenses, and accommodation

during deliberation, charged to the ATI, subject to accounting and auditing rules.

8
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

VIII. SEARCH AND EVALUATION PROCEDURE

To commemorate the 50th Gawad Saka: Parangal sa mga Natatanging Magsasaka at

Mangingisda, the regional search process and regional awarding will be temporarily suspended.
Regional nominees will instead be directly endorsed by the DA-Regional Executive Directors (DA-
RED) to the National Executive Committee through the National Secretariat for evaluation at the
national level. DA-RED may not submit regional nominees in all the 47 subcategories. Only
nominees that fit the qualifications and requirements shall be endorsed.

Figure A. 2025 Gawad Saka Search and Evaluation Process Flow

The NTC shall conduct the desk evaluation of the regional nominees with the scrapbooks and
documents submitted and endorsed by the respective DA-RFO. Subsequently, the NTC shall
submit the shortlist of nominees at a minimum of three (3) and maximum of five (5) and submit
the consolidated field validation and evaluation schedules to the National Secretariat. The NTC
shall determine the ranking of the Top 3 Finalist per category and shall endorse the finalists to
the NEC. The NEC shall review the work of the NTC. Finally, the Board of Judges shall conduct the
final review and evaluation of the finalist and select from among them in the Gawad Saka National
Winners.

9
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

IX. SEARCH RULES AND REGULATIONS

A. Nominations for the National Gawad Saka shall be submitted by the Regional Field
Offices to the GS National Secretariat addressed to the National Executive Committee
Chairperson.
B. Only regional nominees for each subcategory with scrapbook and other required
necessary documents shall be considered and endorsed to the National Technical
Committee.
C. All regional nominees will undergo desk evaluation by the NTCs using the prescribed
evaluation criteria for each subcategory. The immediate two (2) years preceding the
start of the search is the performance period covered for evaluation. Only nominees who
got a score of 85% and above shall be included in shortlist for field validation.
D. During the validation, there should be a quorum among the NTCs (50%+1). Regional GS
Focal Persons/Assisting Technicians should not answer the questions of the validating
team unless called upon to answer.
E. A national winner shall not be eligible for nomination in the same category in the Gawad
Saka Search within five (5) years after winning the award. After winning for three (3)
times on the same category, the winner shall be declared as “Hall of Famer”.
F. Only one (1) National Winner per category shall be declared.
G. The decision of the Board of Judges shall be final, while the NEC Chair shall announce the
final winner.
H. The National Winner’s scrapbook and other documents submitted for evaluation shall
become the property of the Department of Agriculture.

For the specific subcategory guidelines, refer to the respective Annex.

X. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

Qualification of nominees is specific per category. Refer to Annex 1 to Annex 32.

XI. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

For the specific subcategory documentary requirements, refer to Annex 1 to Annex 32.
Documentary requirements shall be consolidated in a scrapbook (both in hard copy and pdf
format) which will be endorsed by the DA-RED to the NEC through the National Secretariat.

XII. BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS

A supplemental guideline will be issued outlining the budgetary requirements for the
Gawad Saka, including prizes for National Winners, honoraria for the Board of Judges, travel
expenses, and other related expenditures.

10
 Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

XIII. AWARDING

The Awarding Ceremony shall be booked preferably at the Malacañan Palace by the
National Secretariat. The National Winner is invited to personally receive the citation and
trophy during the Awarding Ceremony. Content of the citations for the winners should be
provided by the NTC. Cash Award and/or Project Grant shall be deposited to the account of
the winner, or a check will be issued to winners with no bank accounts.

Certificate of Recognition as National Finalist will be given to those included in the Top 3
Finalist per subcategory during the DA Farmers and Fisherfolk month in Quezon City.

XIV. TIMELINE OF ACTIVITIES

Figure below shows the timeline of activities for the 50th Gawad Saka: Parangal sa mga
Natatanging Magsasaka at Mangingisda, outlining the processes from nomination to
the awarding of national winners.

Figure B. 2025 Timeline of Activities

11
Revised Gawad Saka General Guidelines 2024

12
 ANNEX 1.

Rice Cluster
• Irrigator’s Associations for
National Irrigation System
(NIS) and Communal
Irrigation System (CIS)
• Small Water Irrigation
System Associations

`
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUSTANDING IRRIGATOR’S ASSOCIATIONS FOR NATIONAL IRRIGATION
SYSTEM (NIS) AND COMMUNAL IRRIGATION SYSTEM (CIS), AND
SMALL WATER IRRIGATION SYSTEM ASSOCIATIONS

I. RATIONALE

As the staple diet of the Filipino people and a significant source of income for those living
in rural areas, rice is the most important agricultural product in the Philippines. Given the
numerous issues and limitations in the country as well as the economic, social, and
political systems, rice production has always been faced with numerous challenges.

On the other hand, there are farmers and farmer groups or clusters who have succeeded
in their fields. They have raised their revenue and production on the farm by working
hard, learning new things, and implementing new technology. In light of this, the
Department of Agriculture aims to recognize them and share their inspiring stories.

Guided by the Masagana Rice Industry Development Program and its four key strategies,
outstanding rice clusters from the Irrigators’ Associations shall be selected and awarded
under the Gawad Saka - Rice Category.

The National Rice Program (NRP), in partnership with the Agricultural Training Institute
(ATI), seeks to encourage commitment and ensure excellent performance of Local
Government Units (LGUs) and industry stakeholders in their respective functions and
responsibilities to advance the rice industry.

Through this Gawad Saka, the DA shall recognize and highlight their contributions to the
national food self-sufficiency initiatives.

II. OBJECTIVES

a. To give due recognition to achievers in the field of rice production for their exemplary
performance and accomplishments;
b. To provide an incentive to the rice farmer and rice cluster in their efforts to adopt
rice-farming technologies, improve their production and income-generating
activities, and empower themselves to contribute to the welfare and socio-economic
upliftment of their communities;
c. To document success stories in the field of rice production and present role models
that other rice farmers can emulate; and
d. Create an opportunity to strengthen the network of partners and stakeholders in the
Philippine rice industry.

III. SCOPE

The Gawad Saka - Rice Category shall cover rice clusters organized as Irrigators’
Associations (IAs) and Small Water Irrigation System Associations (SWISA) producing
rice for the past 2 (two) cropping seasons.

Outstanding Rice Cluster

 IV. OUTSTANDING RICE CLUSTER-IRRIGATOR’S ASSOCIATIONS (RICE CLUSTER - IA)
FOR NATIONAL IRRIGATION SYSTEM (NIS) AND COMMUNAL IRRIGATION SYSTEM (CIS)

A. Documentary Requirements

1. An IA Cluster under National Irrigation System (NIS) and Communal Irrigation

System (CIS) recognized and certified by the National Irrigation Administration;
2. Coverage area of at least 1,000 hectares for CIS and NIS;
3. Has attained at least 70% membership registered under the Registry System for
Basic Sectors in Agriculture;
4. Its functionality status must be “Outstanding” during the previous years as per the
evaluation survey conducted by the Irrigation Management Offices (IMOs) and
validated by the Regional Irrigation Officers (RIOs);
5. Its registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or
Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) as of December 31, of the year being
evaluated is active i.e. a IA cluster is regularly submitting its annual SEC or CDA
reportorial requirements;
6. Has an existing designated IA Cluster Office;
7. Has a brief description and documentation (organizational structure, list of
officers, etc.) of its IA with the attached project proposal;
8. Must submit the following documents upon nomination:
● Letter of Intent
● Endorsement from the Municipal and Provincial Local Government Units
Chief Executive
● Latest photos of the system (i.e. Watershed, pond or reservoir area, dam
structures, outlet works, irrigation canal, and service area)
● IA cluster’s activities and other relevant information such as certificate of
registration, list of members with landholding size, records of rice variety
use and yield data of each farmer-members for the last two cropping
seasons, financial records, book of accounts, minutes of meetings, success
story and other relevant documents.
● IA cluster nomination from the Manager of the Irrigation Management
Office including the scrapbook, and the IA Score Sheet Result.

B. Evaluation Criteria

1. Operation and Maintenance Performance (35%)

a. Existence of Cropping Calendar/Pattern of Planting (CCPP); Water Delivery

and Distribution (WDD) Plan; Maintenance and Minor Repair Plan and
Maintenance/Sustainability Dues Collection Plan;
b. Implementation of the CCPP, WDD, and Maintenance and Minor Repair;
c. CY 2024 Annual Cropping Intensity - Irrigated Area W+D/FUSA;
d. CY 2024 Rice Production - (W + D)/2 cavans per hectare;
e. Irrigation Management Transfer (IMT) Modified Contract - the IA cluster have
entered into IMT Modified Contract with the NIA;
f. IA Cluster Maintenance Due Payments - at least 70% of IA members that pay
IA Cluster Maintenance due for the Year 2024;
g. Adoption of NIA Advocated Irrigation Operations Enhancing Interventions
such as AWD, Rotational method and compliance to CCPP and WDD;

Outstanding Rice Cluster

 2. Financial Performance (30%)

a. Existence of Financial Plan and Accomplishment

b. Current Ratio/Net worth
● Current Ratio - The current ratio is calculated by dividing current assets
by current liabilities.
● Net Worth - is the value of all assets minus the total of all liabilities.
c. Viability Index - Income/Expense
d. Existence of Financial Audit/Control

3. Assistance Programs/Agri-Support Services/Linkages (35%)

a. IA Ordinances including implementation of the O&M policies - refers to

ordinances formulated by the IA supported by the local government units;
b. Seed Growers - IA members accredited by the BPI as Seed Growers;
c. Income-Generating Projects - the IA has income-generating projects such as
service provider, palay trading, lending, seed production, etc.;
d. Participation of the IA in Provincial, Regional, and National Congress,
Consultations, and Workshops;
e. Co-sponsored/or funded/organized conduct of trainings for Officers and
Members;
f. Owned farm machinery and postharvest facilities;
g. Linkages/Coordination with other Government and Non-government
Agencies.

V. OUTSTANDING RICE CLUSTER-SMALL WATER IRRIGATION SYSTEM ASSOCIATIONS

(RICE CLUSTER-SWISA)

A. Documentary Requirements

1. Must be registered to any of the concerned government entities i.e., SEC, DOLE,
CDA;
2. Must have a service area of at least 100 hectares planted to rice during dry and
wet season, and with at least 70% memberships are registered to RSBSA and
joined in a cluster with other SWISAs or FCAs;
3. Must be active for at the last 3 years and must have a facility that is functional;
4. Must have an average annual rice yield of not less than 4.0MT/ha for two cropping
season;
5. Must submit the following documents upon nomination:
● Letter of Intent
● Endorsement from the Municipal and Provincial Local Government Units
Chief Executive
● Latest photos of the system (i.e. Watershed, pond or reservoir area, dam
structures, outlet works, irrigation canal, and service area)
● SWISA cluster activities and other relevant information such as certificate of
registration, list of members with landholding size, records of rice variety use
and yield data of each farmer for the last two cropping, financial records, book
of accounts, minutes of meeting, success story and other relevant documents.
● Scrapbook showing organizational charts, water distribution plan,
maintenance plan, records of previous yield, list of machineries acquired and
maintained.

Outstanding Rice Cluster

 B. Evaluation Criteria

1. Adoption of new technologies resulting to increased productivity and yield

(50%)

a. Average yield production of two (2) cropping season (wet and dry)
b. Use of (HQS) i.e. Hybrid, Inbred seeds (registered, certified), good seeds or
farmer homes save seeds- with proof and list of farmers using what kind and
quality of seeds.
c. Employ farm mechanization - use of farm equipment for efficient farm
operation thus reducing labor cost and postharvest losses
d. Other strategies that contribute in the increase of yield

2. Organizational (20 points)

a. SWISA cluster has regular meeting and effective execution of its approved
constitution and by-laws, plans and processes developed and agreed by the
association
b. Capacity of SWISA cluster to manage internal and external conflicts - with
clear rules in resolving disputes and tenacity in enforcing agreed sanctions.
(Subject to validation on site)
c. Ability of SWISA cluster to make independent decision, negotiates with
authorities on its own, and establish external linkages to acquire necessary
support
d. With an efficient and reliable financial management system and ability of
SWISA cluster to source out revenues, settle financial obligations and
efficiency in record keeping.

3. System operation and maintenance (30%)

a. Well-maintained physical condition and cleanliness of irrigation structures

and facilities (latest photos or site observations)
b. Existence of system maintenance plan - with clear roles of water users and
clear rules for mobilizing all forms of resources maintaining and repairing the
physical structure
c. Existence of water distribution plan and implementation strategies -
availability of SWISA cluster to implement and practice equitable water
distribution among water users following the approved cropping pattern and
calendar plan.

4. System operation and maintenance (30%)

1. Practices of water conservation, reusing or recycling, and other unique

innovations will be given additional points.

Maximum of 5 points subject to agreement of the Committee.

VI. REGIONAL SEARCH COMMITTEE

The Regional Search Committee shall be composed of identified personnel from the
DA-RFO, BSWM Soil and Water Access Team, DA-National Irrigation Administration Region
Manager, and ATI-Regional Training Center (ATI-RTC).

Outstanding Rice Cluster

ANNEX 2. Corn Farmer
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING CORN FARMER

I. RATIONALE

Corn is the second most important crop in the Philippines. Yellow corn is a vital
component in the production of feeds for the livestock and poultry industry. White corn,
on the other hand, serves as a major staple of 20 percent of Filipinos mostly in the Visayas
and Mindanao islands. Some one million farm households depend on corn as a major
source of livelihood, in addition to transport services, traders, processors, and
agricultural input suppliers who directly benefit from corn production, processing,
marketing, and distribution.

The Corn Program aims to transform corn farmers into agribusiness entrepreneurs
through farm clustering to gain economies of scale, the pursuit of productivity
enhancement measures, production intensification through irrigation and con-based
farming systems, mechanization, and product transformation.

To showcase corn production as an agribusiness activity parallel with the thrusts of the
Corn Program, the Department of Agriculture launched the Search for the Outstanding
Corn Farmer of the Year Award. The Search is vital in terms of providing proof that corn
production is a competitive, profitable, and sustainable agribusiness enterprise.

II. OBJECTIVES

a. To provide an incentive to corn farmers engaged in the efficient and sustainable

production of quality corn;
b. To document success stories of con farmers who are adopting and sharing modern
production and post-production technologies and corn-based farming systems;
c. To encourage other farmers to adopt proper management of technologies and
practices along the corn value chain; and
d. To focus on the importance of corn farming in attaining national food security goals.

III. SCOPE

The Search for the Outstanding Corn Farmer is limited to bonafide Filipino corn farmers
registered under the Registry System for Basic Sectors in Agriculture (RSBSA) and within
corn cluster areas. This will be given annually to an outstanding corn farmer, based on
the approved set of criteria.

IV. QUALIFICATIONS OF NOMINEES

Nominees for the Outstanding Corn Farmer must meet the following minimum
requirements:

a. Must be a Filipino citizen of good character as duly certified by the Barangay

Chairman;
b. Must be at least 21 years of age;
c. Must be a registered corn farmer in RSBSA

Outstanding Corn Farmer

 d. Must be a corn farmer by principal occupation, cultivating not less than one (1)
hectare of corn land per cropping season. The farm of the nominee should meet
the following:
i. Corn grain yield of not less than 7.0 mt/ha and 5.0 mt/ha for yellow and
white, respectively with at most 14 percent moisture content;
ii. Preferably has a standing crop of the same variety planted during the
search and the evaluation period;
e. Must submit complete supporting documents of all his farm activities, expenses,
and income for at least two (2) years. The farmer-nominee must have planted
corn for at least two (2) successive years prior to the evaluation period, as
certified by the Barangay Chairman or Cluster Chairperson;
f. Must be of good credit standing, if a loan borrower;
g. Must be a member of a corn cluster (i.e. association or cooperative);
h. Must be endorsed by the cluster head, either by the Chairman of the Board of the
cooperative or the President of the association; and
i. Must be willing to join and be evaluated by the Search Committee.

V. SEARCH RULES AND REGULATIONS

The following are the general rules and regulations governing the Search for the
Outstanding Corn Farmer:

a. Nomination shall be made by the Chairman of the cluster endorsed by the Local
Government Unit (LGU) using the prescribed form (Appendix 1);
b. Only qualified nominees as defined in Sections III and IV, and with a complete
record book and audiovisual presentation five (5) to fifteen (15) minutes in
length, which contains the highlights of the farmer’s activities and innovative
technologies will be considered for evaluation;
c. The immediate two (2) years preceding the start of the Search is the performance
period covered for evaluation;
d. The deadline set by the National Executive Committee (NEC) is final and should
be strictly followed. Late submissions will not be entertained;
e. Only one (1) regional nominee per region shall be considered for national
evaluation. Only three (3) finalists will be selected. Only one (1) national winner
will be awarded as the Outstanding Corn Farmer, while the two runners-up will
be given citations;

VI. EVALUATION FRAMEWORK

The total capability of the nominee is defined by their adept management of the farm and
its resources, leveraging both their expertise and practical skills. This directly influences
the local community’s well-being. The nominee will be evaluated based on his
management capabilities as (a) an entrepreneur, (b) an innovator, and (c) a contributor
to community development and environmental preservation.

A. The Farmer as an Entrepreneur. The farmer is the prime architect of his farm
system, managing his limited resources - land, labor, and capital - guided by his
technical knowledge and practical skills to achieve practical and familial goals. The
uniqueness of his farming environment requires effective decision-making processes
to ensure the efficient allocation and utilization of resources. The farmer’s corn farm
is his major enterprise from which he draws income to support his family. As an
agribusiness enterprise, his farm competes with other farms in terms of markets. The
competitive advantage and profitability of his main enterprise depend primarily on

Outstanding Corn Farmer

 production efficiency and productivity, coupled with conservation measures that
ensure sustainability of his farm resources.

B. The Farmer as an Innovator. A farmer is not just a cultivator; he is also an innovator,

constantly pushing the boundaries of agricultural practices and technologies to
enhance productivity and sustainability. Whether experimenting with new varieties
or implementing regenerative technologies, the farmer is at the forefront of
agricultural innovation. The farmer’s willingness to adapt to climate change and other
challenges not innovation across his community.

C. The Farmer as a Contributor to the Community. While a farmer’s immediate

concern is to his family, as a citizen, he has an obligation to the community where he
belongs. Exemplary farming performance requires that the farmer successfully
performs as a role model to be emulated by others in the community, which is
measured to a large extent in the adoption of his farming practices by other farmers.

VII. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The following are the criteria for each area of evaluation. The weight of each criterion is
presented in Appendix 2 and summarized in Appendix 3.

A. The Farmer as an Entrepreneur. The farmer is evaluated in terms of the level of

technical knowledge and practice, his decision-making processes, and his farm
resource management competence.

1. Decision-making Processes. These refer to the farmer’s decision- making ability

and processes in making improvements and introducing innovations on the
technical, social, and economic aspects of the farm enterprise.
2. Management Skills/Knowledge/Practices. These aspects refer to the level of
farmer’s knowledge and practices on modern production and post-production
technologies that increase the opportunities and potential for the improvement
of the farming enterprise.
3. Farm Record Keeping. Record keeping is a practice that not only aids in tracking
income and expenses, but also improves planning. Farm record-keeping should
be done for at least two (2) years, immediately preceding the nomination. The
prescribed forms should be used in keeping farm records. Initially, the
Agricultural Technologist (AT) assigned in the area of the
cooperative/association should have guided the nominee in accomplishing the
farm record book. The farm record book should consist the following:

a. Farm Operations. Use separate forms for the corn enterprise and other
enterprise(s), if applicable. Entries should be made every field operation or
activity for every cropping for the last two (2) years. The farm record for each
cropping season should begin with the first resource use (and associated
costs incurred), such as the first purchased input, the first tillage operation,
or preparation of facilities. The record for each cropping season ends at the
time of physical transfer of the final product.

For each activity, the required information should include the following:

1. Date of Operation. Enter the month, day and year when the operation of
activity was done.

Outstanding Corn Farmer

 2. Materials. This should include the name of the material used, type, and
its formulation.
3. Quantity. This is the amount of material used or applied.
4. Unit Price. This is the cost of each unit of material purchased. This should
also include the transportation costs incurred from purchasing the
materials, if applicable.
5. Hired Labor. This is the labor rendered by a person who is paid (in cash
or in kind) by the farmer. This information should be recorded for every
operation in the farm and should indicate the number of people hired for
each activity and the number of hours spent by the laborers.
6. Family Labor. This is the labor rendered by the farmer himself or by the
members of his family not paid in cash or in kind (Appendix 5).
7. Power Source and Hours Used. The power source may be a draft animal
or a mechanical source. In any operation using either animal or
mechanical labor, record properly the number of hours used.
8. Cost per man-day, man-animal-day, or man-machine- day. This is the cost
of labor rendered. Record the prevailing rate per day. For laborers to be
paid in kind during harvest, record properly the agreed basis of payment.

b. Production Record. The production record should contain the actual

production or production of other enterprise(s). These data should be
recorded after every harvest of each cropping season for the last two (2)
years. The production record should also indicate the volume of the products
sold and the price at which it was sold.

c. Farm Report. The Farm Report must contain the following information:

1. Management Practices in the Farm. Based on the data on the farm record
book, define the actual management practices used in the farm by
summarizing them into major activities (e.g. land preparation, planting,
harvesting, drying).
2. Cost and Return Analysis. Calculate the cost and return for the corn
enterprise and the whole farm for every cropping season for the last two
(2) years. This should include all costs incurred, both cash and non-cash
costs, every cropping season (Appendices 4 and 5). The following is the
procedure for analyzing cost and return:

a. Material Input Cost. Total cost of all materials used in each

enterprise (e.g. seeds, fertilizers, herbicides, etc). This is calculated
as:

Total material cost =

(Quantity of material 1 x Unit Price of material 1) + … +
(Quantity of material n x Unit Price of material n)

b. Labor and Power Cost. The amount of labor and power spent in each
operation for every enterprise should be expressed in man-days
(MD), man-animal-days (MAD) or man-machine- days (MMD).
Calculate the total power of cost for each enterprise and then for the
whole farm. The wage rate of hired labor should be used in
accounting for the labor rendered by the farmer and his family not
paid in cash. This is calculated as:

Total labor cost = Total labor (MD) x wage rate +

Outstanding Corn Farmer Total power (MAD/MMD) x rate
 c. Gross Return. The product type, the production volume, and the
product price are important components in calculating the return.
The formula for the gross return is:

Gross Return = volume of product x price of product

d. Net Return. This is computed as:

Net Return = Gross Return - Total Labor Cost

- Total Material Cost

e. Return on Investment (ROI). This is a measure of the return for

every peso invested on the farm. The higher the ROI, the better the
economic performance of the enterprise. This ratio is calculated as:

ROI = Net _______Return

Cost of Investment

4. Farm Resource Management. This refers to the ability of the farmer to allocate
and utilize his resources, while optimizing efficiency and effectiveness, increasing
resource complementation, and subsequently increasing farm productivity. It is
also important for the farmer to be able to overcome resource constraints and to
transform the opportunities and potential of his farm into socio- economic
benefits for his enterprise.

a. Land Resource Utilization. An important measure of efficient land

utilization is cropping intensity. This is computed as the number of
times crops are planted per year in a given area, the higher the
index, the more intensified the utilization of the farmland. A farmer
should likewise have adequate knowledge of and consider land use
constraints (e.g. soil toxicity, pest-disease dynamics).
b. Farm Labor Optimization. Good labor management must be able to
overcome labor constraints as well as enhance labor opportunities
into productive benefits.
c. Capital Allocation. This refers to how the farmer manages his cash
capital and how he overcomes capital constraints.

5. Adoption and/or Innovation of Technology. This refers to the adoption of good

agricultural practices and technologies including innovations showcasing the
resilience and competitiveness of the farmer.

B. The Farm. The farmer is evaluated based on his corn production performance and
the practice of corn-based farming systems.

1. Corn Production. The farmer’s corn production enterprise is measured on the

following performance criteria:

Outstanding Corn Farmer

 a. Productivity. This is the measure of production per unit area, in metric
tons or kilograms per hectare.
b. Production Efficiency. This is measured in terms of the average cost per
unit of production, in pesos per kilogram.
c. Sustainability. This is an assessment of the ability of the farming system
to continue high production levels in the longer term. This farming ability
depends mainly on the farmer’s practices related to the conservation of
ecological balance and resources, the use of indigenous resources, and the
safety of human and animal health.

2. Entrepreneurial Ability. The farmer is evaluated based on the adoption of

entrepreneurial and management skills. This is measured by the following
criteria:

a. Profitability. This is measured with income and expenses, indicating the

degree to which the enterprise gains profit arising from corn-based
activities in the farm.
b. Degree of Integration. This is a measure of the extent of integration in the
farm, i.e. the number of enterprises and the scale of integration.
c. Value adding. A measure of the capability of the farmer to increase the net
profit from his products.
C. Social Contributions. The farmer’s contribution to the development of his
community is evaluated based on the following:

1. Involvement in the Community. The farmer as a role model is enhanced by

his affiliation with agriculture-related organizations as well as civic, political,
and religious organizations.
2. Benefits to Other Farmers. This refers to the effect of the farming system on
the improvement of the welfare of the community. This criterion can be
indirectly measured by the farmer’s involvement as a farmer trainer and the
use of his farm as a show window. Community welfare is likewise enhanced
by the additional employment generated by his farm enterprise(s).
3. Award Recognition Received (with evaluation). This refers to the awards
and honors received by the farmer, reflecting their excellence, commitment
and positive influence on other farmers and their community.
4. Degree of Social Influence. This assesses the farmer’s leadership and
influence within his community. This refers to his leadership roles in his
organization(s) or his mentoring and training of other farmers.
5. Tax Filing and/or Payment. This refers to the farmer’s compliance with tax
obligations, reflecting his financial responsibility as a citizen and enterprise
operator and his contributions to the overall economic development of his
community. This includes tax filings for income, business, realty, etc.

VIII. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

A. Scrap Book. The nominee himself shall prepare the nominee’s scrap book into
the prescribed format, to be guided by the AT assigned in the area who shall verify
and check the accuracy and completeness of the book. The book must contain
records for every cropping season for the last two (2) years and must have the
following format:
1. Table of Contents;

Outstanding Corn Farmer

 2. Nomination form duly accomplished by the cluster
chairperson (Appendix 1);
3. Duly accomplished farm survey questionnaire with two (2)
ID pictures;
4. Brief biography or write-up of the nominee;
5. Farm location map. Sketch the location of the farm,
indicating roads and important landmarks;
6. Farm layout. Sketch the land allocation to the different
enterprises in the farm with their respective area, if
applicable. Label each subdivision properly with the
corresponding enterprise;
7. Cropping pattern diagram. Graph all the cropping patterns
used in the farm against the months of the year with
planting and harvesting times properly indicated;
8. Farm report containing the following:
a. Management practices used in the farm, by enterprise;
b. Production record; and
c. Cost and return analysis, by enterprise and total;
9. Farm photographs. The photographs should show the actual stand of the
corn crop and any enterprise in the farm during the record- keeping
period. Different activities for each enterprise (e.g. planting, spraying,
etc.) should also be included. Activities that need special attention should
be taken into focus;
10. Audiovisual presentation not more than fifteen (15) minutes in length,
highlighting the major activities on the farm.

B. Supporting documents from the Farmer-Nominee:

1. Certification from the Barangay Chairman that the nominee is a resident
of the locality, a Filipino citizen, a non-DA employee, and of good moral
character;
2. National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) clearance of the farmer, issued
within six months prior to the nomination;
3. Certification from the AT that the nominee is a bonafide farmer, actually
and personally farming a specified contiguous area;
4. Certification from a financing institution that the farmer is in good credit
standing, if a loan borrower;
5. Photocopies of all documents and materials indicating meritorious
contributions and accomplishments in the field of endeavor (e.g.
certificate of membership to farmer organization, community
involvement in certain projects, etc.);
6. Income Tax Return for the preceding two (2) years, duly certified by the
Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), if applicable.

IX. EVALUATION METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A. Data Collection

The following are the procedures and methods to be used under different evaluation
levels (Municipal, Provincial, Regional, and National).

Outstanding Corn Farmer

 1. Barangay and Municipal Levels. Data collection under the barangay and municipal
levels shall be more detailed since the nominating officer can visit the nominee
regularly. The following are suggested procedures and methods of collecting
information:

a. Farmer interview. Collect from the prospective nominee information related

to his personal data and basic information about his farming operations. A
questionnaire (Form 2) shall be provided for the nominee to answer, to be
administered by the AT. During the interview, the AT should validate the
contents of the farm records including the farm operations and other
activities of the farmer.
b. Field observation. Assess the prospective nominee’s farm. Examine the
occurrence of pests, diseases, weeds, and the general standing of the crop(s)
and animals. Observe also the dissemination or adoption of the farm’s
technologies on the adjacent farms.
c. Collection of existing data. All farmers interested in joining the Search must
have a farm record book. It contains information about the farming system
and other relevant information pertaining to his farming activities. Farmers
are also advised to keep record of expenses, and certificates of training, and
awards received. These will form part of the record book to be submitted for
evaluation by the Regional and National Search Committees.

2. Provincial, Regional and National Levels. Data collection at the provincial,

regional, and national levels is limited to one-shot data collection methods
because of accessibility limitations. The following are the suggested
procedures and methods of collecting information:

a. Review and evaluation of the existing data (record book). The nominee’s
record book provides most of the information needed in the evaluation. The
evaluators must first determine whether each of the candidates is qualified
by checking if the candidates meet the qualifications set for the Search. Make
preliminary evaluations using the candidates’ record book and rank them
according to their respective scores. The evaluation criteria and analysis are
discussed in Sections VIII and X, respectively.

b. Conduct a farm visit. Farm visits should be scheduled at strategic intervals,

i.e. when the crop or animals are still standing. Videos and/or pictures of the
candidate’s farm, which may be taken by the regional office, are important
for the evaluation at the national level. At the provincial and regional levels,
whenever convenient, all candidates may be visited by the evaluating team.
At the national level, or when it is inconvenient to visit all candidates, it is
necessary to make a short list of the candidates. Only the top four to five will
be considered for further evaluation period. Only the evaluators shall visit
the short-listed candidates. Submission of additional documents during the
national validation is strictly not allowed. During the visits, collect necessary
information through:

c. Informal interviews. The following are to be interviewed by the team:

i. The candidate. An interview with the candidate should
be made to determine the accuracy of the farm report,
especially on the candidate’s management skills
including his attitude and behavior towards farming.
Basic information about the farming system could be

Outstanding Corn Farmer

 checked from the candidate’s record book, which he has
made earlier. A checklist of questions may be prepared
for the interview, which should be kept confidential to
avoid pre- answered questions, coached by the AT or
other DA personnel.
ii. Neighboring or adjacent farmers. Interviews with
neighboring farmers are necessary to determine the
candidate’s status and contributions to the community.
iii. Key informants. These include barangay leaders and
other persons who are familiar with the candidate.
Questions should relate to the farmer’s role and
contributions to the community.

d. Field observation and measurement. These activities enable the evaluators to

get first-hand information about the farm and verify the accuracy of the
candidate’s record book. The evaluators should be able to assess the general
stand of the crops/animals on the farm by examining the occurrence of pests,
diseases, nutrient deficiencies, weeds and diseases, parasites, and
deficiencies of animals.

B. Evaluation Analysis

The scoring methods shall be used in the evaluation. For each level of evaluation, each
evaluator shall rate each candidate using the set of criteria in Appendix 2. The weight for
each criterion represents the maximum score for such criterion. The total score for each
candidate is determined by adding all the scores of each criterion. The candidate with the
highest score shall be declared the winner.

Outstanding Corn Farmer

Form 1. Nomination Form

SEARCH FOR THE OUTSTANDING CORN FARMER OF THE YEAR AWARD

NOMINATION FORM

Name of Nominee : _______________________________________________________________

Address : __________________

Province/Region : _______________________________________________________________________

Justification/Reasons For Nomination:

Nominated by :
(Printed Name and Signature)
Position :
Address :

Assisted by :
(Printed Name and Signature)

Outstanding Corn Farmer

Form 2. Evaluation Score Sheet Summary

SEARCH FOR THE OUTSTANDING CORN FARMER

EVALUATION SCORE SHEET SUMMARY

Name of Farmer-Nominee : ____

Complete Address : ____
Municipality : _____________
Province and Region : ____

Rated by :
(Printed Name and Signature)
Position/Designation:
Date signed :

SUMMARY EVALUATION CRITERIA

INDICATO Max. SCORE REMAR

RS Points KS
I. The Farmer as an Entrepreneur 35
A. Decision-making process/ability 7
B. Management 8
Skills/Knowledge/Practices
C. Farm Record Keeping 5
D. Farm Resource Management 10
E. Climate Change Adaptation/Mitigation 5
II. The Farm 50
A. Corn Production 35
B. Farm Improvements 15
III. Social Contributions 15
A. Participation in Community Development 3
B. Impact to Other Farmers 6
C. Award Recognition Received 4
D. Degree of Social Influence 2
IV. Bonus Points (Tax Filing) 5
TOTAL 105

Outstanding Corn Farmer

Form 3. Evaluation Score Card

SEARCH FOR THE OUTSTANDING CORN FARMER

EVALUATION SCORE CARD

Name of Farmer-Nominee : ____

Address : ______________________

Municipality : _____________
Province and Region : _____________

Rated by : _______________________________
(Printed Name and Signature)

Position/Designation : ____
Date signed : _____________

UNIT SUB TOTAL

INDICATORS POIN TOTA
T L
I. The Farmer as an Entrepreneur 35
A. Decision-making process/ability 7
1. Appropriate basis for varietal use 2
2. Appropriate basis for fertilizer use 2
3. Appropriate basis for pest & disease management
practices 2
4. Basis for postharvest options 1
B. Management Skills/Knowledge/Practices 8
1. Use of high-yielding variety 2
2. Fertilizer usage based on soil analysis 2
3. Knowledge of major pest and control options 2
4. Knowledge of aflatoxin, proper corn drying &
storage practice 2
C. Farm Record Keeping 5
1. Record book for the last 2 years (min.) 2
2. Contents of the record book 1
3. Receipts of expenses and sales 1
4. Relevance of the record book 1

D. Farm Resource Management 1

0
1. Farm Plan and Budget
If the farmer has document/planning tool such as
cash flow budget or whole farm budget with 5
complete information on the projected
inflows/outflows over a given period

Outstanding Corn Farmer

 UNIT SUB TOTAL
INDICATORS POIN TOTA
T L
2. Cost and Return Analysis 5
E. Climate Change Adaptation/Mitigation 5
1. Synchronization of planting to weather condition
1
2. Use of appropriate pre- and postharvest facilities
1
3. Use of tolerant/resistant varieties 1
4. Other sustainable innovations 2
(max.)
a. Quality/value-adding
b. Soil conservation practices
c. Use of bio-organic fertilizer/composting of farm
waste
d. Use of bio-organic fertilizer/composting of
farm waste
e. Crop rotation practice
f. Cropping intensity
g. Integrated pest management
h. Crop insurance
i. Hedgerow, if applicable
II. The Farm 50
A. Corn Production
1. Average Yield (mt/ha) 15
7.0 - 8.0 4
8.01 - 9.0 5
9.01 - 9.50 6
9.51 - 10.0 7
10.01 - 10.50 8
10.51 - 11.0 9
11.01 - 11.5 10
11.51 - 12.0 11
12.01 - 12.50 12
12.51 - 13.0 13
13.01 - 14.0 14
Above 14.0 15
2. Return on Investment (ROI) 10
1.00 - 1.25 4
1.26 - 1.50 5

Outstanding Corn Farmer

 UNIT SUB TOTAL
INDICATORS POIN TOTA
T L
1.51 - 1.75 6
1.76 - 2.00 7
2.01 - 2.25 8
2.26 - 2.50 9
Above 2.50 10
3. Average production cost per kilogram 10
Below 3.50 10
3.51 - 4.0 9
4.01 - 4.50 8
4.51 - 5.0 7
5.01 - 5.50 6
5.51 - 6.0 5
Above 6.0 4
B. Farm Improvements 15
1. Availability of irrigation water 3
2. Soil conservation practices 3
3. Availability of farm equipment 3
4. Availability of postharvest facilities 3
5. Proper waste disposal 3
III. Social Contributions 15
A. Participation in community development 3
1. Affiliation with agri-related community
organization
2
a. 2 or more affiliations - 2 pts (max.)
b. 1 affiliation - 1 pt
2. Affiliation with civic/political/religious
organization 1

B. Impact to Other Farmers 6

5 or more farmers adopted the nominee’s technology
or practice 6
Less than 5 farmers adopted the nominee’s
technology or practice 3
C. Award Recognition Received (with evaluation) received
for the last 10 years 4
1. Regional/Provincial/City/Municipal
Recognition (2 pts maximum)
. Award received within the last 5 years - 2 pts
a. Award received beyond the last 5 years – 1 pt 2
(max.)

Outstanding Corn Farmer

 UNIT SUB TOTAL
INDICATORS POIN TOTA
T L
2. National/International Awards (2 pts 2
maximum) (max.)
. Award received within the last 5 years - 2 pts
. Award received beyond the last 5 years - 1 pt

D. Degree of Social Influence (farmer leader/officer in an

organization) 2
IV. Bonus Points 5 5

Tax filing (Income, Business, Realty, etc.) 5

TOTAL 105

Outstanding Corn Farmer

ANNEX 3. Corn Cluster
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING CORN CLUSTER

I. RATIONALE
The Agricultural Training Institute (ATI), in collaboration with the National Corn
Program (NCP), will conduct the Gawad Saka to recognize the achievements of cluster
organizations in support of the development of the corn industry. It aims to strengthen
the partnership between the Department of Agriculture (DA) and the corn stakeholders
in producing safe and quality corn and promote its value chain approach.

Hence, this Guideline is being issued as a reference and guide for all DA Operating Units
regarding the implementation of the activity.

II. SCOPE

The Search is open to all established corn cluster organizations and accredited as a Civil
Society Organization (CSO) by the DA (Regional/National).

The Outstanding Corn Cluster Award shall be given to the top corn cluster organization
that have been involved and have exhibited exemplary performances in the
implementation of various projects and activities along the value chain.

III. GENERAL PROVISIONS

The Search for the Outstanding Corn Cluster shall have the following general provisions:

a. The nominee shall be eligible only upon compliance with minimum

requirements as defined in Section IV;
b. The nominated cluster organization shall submit a strategic plan (Appendix 1)
covering the evaluation period;
c. The Regional Search Committee (RSC) shall use the scorecard on the evaluation
of the nominated cluster organization (Appendix 3), and the summary of the
Evaluation Score Card (Appendix 2) to determine the top- performing corn
cluster;
d. The Regional Search Committee (RSC) shall endorse to the National Technical
Committee (NTC) their corn cluster regional nominee;
e. The data on corn production, area, and yield (for the past two years) shall be
attested by the PA/MA/MAO/CA/CAO;
f. Corn samples for analyses shall follow the sampling protocol (Appendix 4) and
shall be analyzed by a DA-accredited analytical laboratory except the Regional
Animal Feed Analytical Laboratory (RAFAL) of the endorsing Region;
g. Scrap books (Appendix 5) endorsed by the RSC shall be submitted to the
National Executive Council (NEC) through the NTC for evaluation. The deadline
for the submission of record books shall be strictly enforced;

IV. SELECTION CRITERIA AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS

The interested cluster organizations are required to submit the following requirements:

A. Technical Requirements:

1. The cluster average yield is at 5 mt/ha and 3 mt/ha for yellow and white corn,
respectively at 14% and below moisture content;

Outstanding Corn Cluster

 2. Minimum physical area of 75 hectares devoted to corn production
(yellow/white);
3. Cropping intensity should be at least two cropping per year, with one cropping
devoted to corn;
4. There should be RSBSA-registered farmers corresponding to the land area
declared;
5. Production of quality corn with at most 50 ppb (for feeds) and 20 ppb (for food)
aflatoxin level.

B. Administrative Requirements:

1. Letter of Intent by the Cluster Farmer Cooperative/Association (FCA) signed by

the Chairperson of the Board of Directors/Trustees;
2. Endorsement letter either from the PA/MA/MAO/CA/CAO, and RSC;
3. A cluster organization must have a complete set of officers, list of active
members, 5-year farm cluster development plan or action plan approved by
BOD/BOT, concurred by PA/MA/CA, and endorsed to DA-RFO for reference.
The cluster development plan or action plan should have the following
components:
a. Executive Summary;
b. Description of the Cluster (Location, Farming System, Number of Farmers,
etc.);
c. Detailed SWOT on the production system, postharvest facilities and
infrastructures, irrigation system, marketing system, and organization;
d. Vision and Mission Statements;
e. Objectives;
f. Strategies;
g. Annual Physical and Financial Targets and Major Activities for the next 3
to 5 years; and
h. Monitoring and Assessment;
4. It must be duly registered and valid during the evaluation period in any of the
following: Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)/ Department of Labor and
Employment (DOLE)/Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and DA
Accredited Civil Society Organization (DA-CSO);
5. Certificate of good standing or compliance from any certifying agency; and
6. The scrap book must be softbound (Appendix 5). An e-copy shall be submitted.

V. REGIONAL SEARCH COMMITTEE (RSC)

A. Composition

DA Regional Field Offices shall spearhead the formation of RSC, with the following
recommended composition:

Chairperson: Regional Executive Director/ Regional Technical Director

(Operations/Research and Regulation)
Vice-Chairperson: ATI Center Director
Members: Field Operations Division Chief
Regional Corn Coordinator
Regional Agricultural and Fisheries Council Chairperson or
Sector Representative

Outstanding Corn Cluster

 Agribusiness Marketing Assistance Division (AMAD) Chief
or Representative
Regional Integrated Laboratory Division Chief or
Representative Chemist
Regulatory Division Chief or Representative
Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Division (PMED) Chief
or Representative
Head Secretariat: Regional Corn Coordinator
Members: Regional Corn, Cassava, Sorghum and Soybean Program Staff
and Regional Agriculture and Fisheries Information
Section, PMED Staff

B. Responsibilities

1. The RSC shall be responsible for disseminating information relevant to the

Search guidelines to all cluster organizations in provinces, cities and
municipalities;
2. The RSC shall be responsible for evaluating the performance of nominated corn
cluster organizations based on submitted record books vis-a-vis approved
criteria and guidelines (see item III); and
3. The RSC shall endorse to the NEC through the NTC the cluster organization with
the highest points garnered.

VI. APPENDICES

Appendix 1. Strategic Plan Template

Appendix 2. Evaluation Sheet Summary
Appendix 3. Evaluation Scorecard
Appendix 4. Sampling Protocol
Appendix 5. Contents of the Scrap Book
Appendix 6. Abbreviations
Appendix 7. Definition of Terms

Outstanding Corn Cluster

Appendix 1. Strategic Plan Template

STRATEGIC PLAN TEMPLATE

(3 - 5 years)

I Name of Cluster

II Executive Summary

III Description of the Cluster

Location, Farming System, Number of Farmers, etc.

IV Detailed SWOT on the following:

Production System, Postharvest facilities and infrastructure, Irrigation
System, Marketing System, Organization (Farmers’ capacity, knowledge of
farmers)

V Vision Statement

VI Mission Statement

VII Objectives

VIII Strategies

IX Yearly Physical and Financial Targets and Major Activities

X Monitoring and Assessment

XI Annexes

Outstanding Corn Cluster

Appendix 2. Evaluation Sheet Summary

SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING CORN CLUSTER

EVALUATION SHEET SUMMARY

REGION
PROVINCE
CLUSTER NAME
ADDRESS
DATE

Rated by (Printed name and signature)

Position/Designation
Date signed

SUMMARY EVALUATION CRITERIA

INDICATORS MAX PT TOTAL REMARKS

SCORE
I. Planning 5 5
II. Operations 2 2
5 5
A. Cluster Competency 1
7
B. Networking and Collaboration 8
III. Scope of Business Operations 1 1
9 9
A. Presence of Multiple Enterprises 1
0
B. Internal Social Services 5
C. External Social Services 4
IV. Other Achievements 5 5
V. Cluster Accomplishments 3 3
5 5
A. Physical Accomplishments 8
B. Quality Accomplishments 1
0
C. Value Adding Activities 8
D. Marketing Activities 9
VI. Financial Management 1 1
1 1
A. Fund Sourcing 3
B. Financial standing of the
8
cluster organization
VII. Community Engagement 5 5 All or
nothing

Outstanding Corn Cluster

 VIII. Bonus Points
1. GAP (maximum of 3 points) 5 5
2. Adoption of SCoPSA = 2 pts.
Total 1
1
0

Outstanding Corn Cluster

Appendix 3. Evaluation Scorecard

SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING CORN CLUSTER

EVALUATION SCORECARD

OVERALL
MAXIMUM
INDICATORS REMARKS WEIGHTED
POINTS
POINTS
I. PLANNING 5
Presence of a cluster strategic ● 3-5 years strategic plan - 3 points (5
plan ● Annual operational targets and activities – 2 points )
II. OPERATIONS 25
A. Cluster Competency (1
7)
1. Number of Cluster Members Total number of members: 5
● 75 to 125 members - 2 points
● 126 to 175 members - 3 points
● 176 to 200 members - 4 points
● More than 200 members - 5 points

2. Well-organized and functional Tasks and responsibilities of the cluster manager and 2 All or nothing
structure management team as well as day-to-day business and strategic
activities of the cluster should be well defined. There should be
a functional chart and organogram should be posted.

Documentary support – Duties and responsibilities of managers

and officers, attested by the governing body.

Outstanding Corn Cluster

 OVERALL
MAXIMUM
INDICATORS REMARKS WEIGHTED
POINTS
POINTS
3. Resolutions approved by the A governance board or its equivalent to conduct decision making 5
board relevant to cluster management in implementing the
development/action plan.
● 1 to 5 resolutions = 2 Points
● 6 and above resolutions = 5 Points

4. Human resource Sufficient human resources of the cluster in terms of the number 5
competencies and of external trainings and the experience of officers.
development in the cluster
a. Organizational Management training = Maximum of 2
organization (for officers)
Points (1 point per Training Title)

- Appropriate trainings attended for the last 2 years (e.g.

leadership training, entrepreneurship, etc.)
b. Technical Training = Maximum of 3 Points (1
point per Training Title)

(e.g. Trainings of Trainers, Techno Demo, Good Agricultural

Practices for Corn Season-Long, Farmers Field School and
other corn-related Trainings, Simple bookkeeping)

Outstanding Corn Cluster

 OVERALL
MAXIMUM
INDICATORS REMARKS WEIGHTED
POINTS
POINTS
B. Networking and Collaboration 8
1. Nature of cooperation with ● Production support= 1 Point 3
other ● Postharvest support = 1 Point
clusters/government/NGOs ● R&D collaboration = 1 Point
(during evaluation period)

2. Business partnership (Farmer ● Approved marketing contracts (Purchase Order or 5 All or nothing
Organizations, Certification from the buyer) with buyers.
processors/manufacturers)

III. SCOPE OF BUSINESS OPERATIONS 19

A. Presence of multiple enterprises (10)
1. Agribusiness enterprises Number of agribusiness enterprise/product diversification (i.e. 7
processing of grits, feed milling, etc.)
● 1-2 enterprise - 3 points
● more than 2 enterprise - 7 points

2. Agri-related enterprises Number of agri-related enterprise (i.e. provision of credit 3

through cash or inputs, gas station, supermarket, etc.)
- 3 points

B. Internal Social Services Services rendered (within the evaluation period) geared to (5)
address needs of the cluster members
● Provision of scholarship grants = 1 point
● Provision of burial assistance = 1 point
● Provision of medical assistance = 1 point
● Provision of calamity assistance = 1 point
● Provision of other social services = 1 point

Outstanding Corn Cluster

 OVERALL
MAXIMUM
INDICATORS REMARKS WEIGHTED
POINTS
POINTS
C. External Social Services Services rendered geared towards community development (4)
● FMRs & other infrastructures (basketball court,
hospital, etc) = 1 point
● Conduct of medical missions = 1 point
● Calamity assistance/donations = 1 point
IV. OTHER ACHIEVEMENTS 5

Awards Received by the Regional/Provincial/Municipal/ City 2

Cluster for the last 10 years ● award received within the last 5 years - 2 pts
● award received beyond the last 5 years - 1 pt
National/International Awards 3
● award received within the last 5 years - 3 pts
● award received beyond the last 5 years - 1 pt
V. CLUSTER ACCOMPLISHMENTS 35
A. Physical Accomplishments 8
1. Average Yield (mt/ha) Yellow Corn White Corn 4
5.10 to 6.00 = 2 Points 3 to 3.5 = 2 points
6.10 to 7.00 = 3 Points 3.6 to 5.0 = 3 points
above 7.00 = 4 Points above 5.0 = 4 points
2. Physical Area planted to Corn Minimum Physical Area Planted to Corn by the 4
Cluster = 75 ha
● 75 to 100 = 2 Points
● 101 to 200 = 3 Points
● above 200 = 4 Points

Outstanding Corn Cluster

 OVERALL
MAXIMUM
INDICATORS REMARKS WEIGHTED
POINTS
POINTS
B. Quality Accomplishments 10
1. Moisture Content Ideal moisture content: 2
Fresh grains: 18%
Dried grains: 14%

2. Aflatoxin Content 50 ppb for feeds and 20 ppb for food 3

3. Physical Standards Physical Quality of Corn (Refer to Corn Standard/PNS BAFS) 5
Class A – 5 points
Class B – 3 points
Class C – 1 point
C. Value-adding Activities 8
1. Quantity of Corn ● 20 to 60% of the produce = 2 points 4
Grains/Biomass Processed ● 61 to 100% of the produce = 4 points
2. Production of Organic 4
Fertilizer utilizing corn
Stalks
D. Marketing Accomplishments 9
1. Volume of Produce/Products ● 20 to 60% of the produce = 2 points 4
sold to Market ● 61 to 100% of the produce = 4 points
2. Coverage of Market ● City/Municipal Level = 1 point 5
● Provincial Level = 2 points
● Regional Level = 3 points
● National Level = 4 points
● International Level = 5 points

Outstanding Corn Cluster

 OVERALL
MAXIMUM
INDICATORS REMARKS WEIGHTED
POINTS
POINTS
VI. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 11
A. Fund sourcing ● Internal fund only (Self-reliant organization) = 1 Points 3
● Internal fund + Loan (should not be more than 30% of
the total asset) = 2 Points
● Internal fund + Loan + External Funds
(Grants) = 3 Points
B. Financial standing of the cluster organization (To be based on the Audited Financial 8
Statement for the previous year)
1. Current Liquidity / Solvency ● <2:1 = 1 Point 2
Ratio (Current Assets: ● >2:1 = 2 Points
Current Liabilities)
2. Debt Ratio ● <1:2 = 1 point 2
● >1:2 = 2 points

3. Total Assets of the ● PhP 2M to 3M = 1 point 4

Organization (Current and ● PhP 3.1M to 4M = 2 points
Fixed) ● PhP 4.1 to 5M = 3 points
● Above PhP 5M = 4 points
VII. Community Assistance to the natural calamity affected areas. 5 All or nothing
Engagement Donation/support to foundation.

VIII. BONUS POINTS ● Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) - 3 points max. 5

● Adoption of SCoPSA - 2 points

TOTAL 110

Outstanding Corn Cluster

Appendix 4. Sampling Protocol

Note: Samples must be strictly taken from the new harvest of farmer members within
the cropping season.

SAMPLING OF DRIED CORN GRAINS

1. Dried grain samples (14% MC) should be taken from the harvest of five (5)
farmer members. Collect two kilograms of dried samples from each member
farmer.
2. Mix the collected dried grain samples and obtain 2 kilograms’ composite
sample from the lot and place in a polyethylene bag (4 mm or thicker).
3. Composite sample of the cluster must be properly labeled for traceability
purposes using permanent marker and readable, taking note of the
information on sample tags/code that goes with the sample such as:

a. Cluster Name
b. Location of the Cluster
c. Name of Contact Person(s)
d. Phone Number of the Contact Person(s)
e. Variety of Corn Sample
f. Date of Packaging
g. Name of Collector

4. Record all information in the logbook.

5. Cluster samples shall be brought to the laboratory for analysis.
6. Cluster samples shall be analyzed on the physical and chemical qualities based
on the PNS of dried corn grains.

Outstanding Corn Cluster

 CONTENTS OF THE SCRAP BOOK
Requirements for the Cluster Organization

Requirements
A. Letter of Intent signed by the Cluster Manager and noted by the Chairman of the
Board of Directors/BOT
B. Endorsement of the MA/CA and or PA
C. Endorsement of the RED
D. Certified true copy of Certificate of Registration and Certificate of Good Standing from
either of the following (F2C2 cluster organization)
• Cooperative (CDA Registration)
• Association (SEC Registration)
E. Cluster Plan (Mandatory)
● 3 - year Strategic Plan
● Annual Operational Plan (Current)

II. Cluster Competency

A. List of members who planted during the covered period
● Ratio of full-time cluster employees to farmer members
B. Governance Board and Management Team
● List of members of the Governance Board
● List of the Management Team Members with their duties and responsibilities
attested by the Governance Board
● Composition of organizational membership (committee participants)
C. Resolutions approved and implemented by the Governance Board during the rating
period
D. Human resource competencies and development in the cluster organization
(For officers)
a. Management/ Leadership trainings
b. Technical trainings (production- postharvest related)
E. Capability of Members

III. Cluster Accomplishments

a. Physical Accomplishments
a.1 Physical Area Planted (ha)
a.2 Ave. Yield Per Hectare (mt/ha)
b. Quality Accomplishments
b.1 Physical Quality of Dried Grains
b.2 Chemical Quality
c. Value Adding Activities
c.1 Food/feeds
c.2 Industrial/handicraft
d. Marketing Activities
d.1 Percentage of produce/products
d.2 Coverage of market

Outstanding Corn Cluster

 IV. Networking and Collaboration
a. Nature of cooperation with other clusters/Government/NGOs
b. Business partnership
V. Internal Services
● Provision of Production & Post-Harvest Services
● Capability Building for Members
● Value-adding Services among participants
VI. Cluster Financial Management
● Sources of Funds
a. Internal fund + Loan + External Funds (Grants)
b. Internal fund + Loan (should not be more than 30% of the total asset)
c. Internal fund (Self-reliant organization)
● Financial Standing of the Cluster Organization
a. Audited Financial Statement by the External Auditor
b. Current liquidity ratio
c. Debt Ratio
d. Total Assets
VII. Other Achievements
● Awards Received by the Cluster Organization

VIII. Bonus Points

● GAP Certified Farms in the Cluster (Profile)
● Adoption of SCoPSA/SLRMA

Outstanding Corn Cluster

 ABBREVIATIONS

AMAD Agribusiness and Marketing Assistance Division

AMAS Agribusiness and Marketing Assistance Services
ATI Agricultural Training Institute
BAFS Bureau of Agriculture and Fisheries Standards
BAI Bureau of Animal Industry
BAR Bureau of Agricultural Research
BPI Bureau of Plant Industry
BSWM Bureau of Soils and Water Management
CA City Agriculturist
CAO City Agricultural Officer City
CCC Corn Coordinator
CSO Civil Society Organization
DA Department of Agriculture
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
FOS Field Operation Services
FPOPD Field Program Operational Planning Division
GAP Good Agricultural Practices
LGU Local Government Units
MA Municipal Agriculturist
MAO Municipal Agricultural Officer
MCC Municipal Corn Coordinator
NSC National Steering Committee
NEC National Executive Committee
Ppb Parts Per Billion (µg/kg) Provincial
PAO Agriculturist Provincial Agricultural
PCC Officer Provincial Corn Coordinator
PCAF Philippine Council for Agriculture and Fisheries
PNS Philippine National Standards
PSA Philippine Statistics Authority
PhilMech Philippine Center for Postharvest Development and Mechanization
RAFC Regional Agriculture and Fisheries Council
RED Regional Executive Director
RCC Regional Corn Coordinator
RAFAL Regional Animal Feed Analytical Laboratory Regional
RSC Search Committee
RTD Regional Technical Director
SCoPSA Sustainable Corn Production in Sloping Areas
SLRMA Sustainable Land Resources Management Approach
SWOC Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges

Outstanding Corn Cluster

 DEFINITION OF TERMS

Corn Production Cluster - a geographic concentration of corn farms managed by farmer

organization in an area of not less than 75 hectares, adjacent or contiguous.

Corn Sample- a portion of corn grains randomly taken from a larger quantity or lot.
Cluster – refers to geographic area covered and managed by farmer a cooperative or association.

Current Ratio – is the ratio of current assets to current liabilities.

(http://www.netmba.com/finance/financial/ratios/)

Debt Ratio- the ratio of total debts to total assets.

(http://www.netmba.com/finance/financial/ratios/)

Effective area - is the size of the land used for agricultural operation, reported as many times
as it was planted to the same crops or different crops during the reference period.

Governance Board – responsible for the overseeing the operations and in running the
organization.

Net worth- (sometimes called net or wealth) – a measure of how much an entity is worth;
the value of total assets minus total liabilities

Physical Area- actual measurement of the land, reported only once regardless of how many
times it was used during the reference period.

Strategic Plan - Constitutes the cluster plan on the agribusiness enterprise for three (3)
years.

Outstanding Corn Cluster

ANNEX 4. Cassava Cluster
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING CASSAVA CLUSTER

I. RATIONALE

The Department of Agriculture (DA), thru the Agricultural Institute (ATI) in collaboration
with the National Corn Program (NCP) shall conduct the search of Outstanding Cassava
Cluster to recognize the achievements of cluster organizations in support to the development
of the cassava industry. It aims to strengthen the partnership of the Department of
Agriculture (DA) and the cassava stakeholders in the production of safe and quality cassava,
and promote its value chain approach.

Hence, this Guidelines is being issued as a reference and guide for all DA Operating Units
regarding the implementation of the activity.

II. SCOPE

The Search is open to all organized cassava cluster organizations and accredited as Civil
Society Organization (CSO) by the DA (Regional/National).

The Award shall be given to the top cassava cluster organization that have been involved
and have exhibited exemplary performances in the implementation of various projects and
activities along the value chain.

III. GENERAL PROVISIONS

The Search for the Outstanding Cassava Cluster shall have the following general provisions:

A. The nominee shall be eligible only upon compliance of minimum requirements as

defined in Section III;
B. The nominee shall submit a strategic (Appendix 1) and operational plan (Appendix 2)
covering the evaluation period;
C. The Regional Search Committee (RSC) shall use the score card on the evaluation of the
nominated cluster organization (Appendix 3), and the summary of the Evaluation Score
Card (Appendix 4) to determine the top performing cassava cluster;
D. The Regional Search Committee (RSC) shall endorse to the National Executive
Committee (NSC) their top regional nominee;
E. The cluster data on cassava production, area and yield (for the past two years) shall be
attested by the PA/MA/MAO/CA/CAO;
F. Cassava samples (from the cluster) for analyses shall follow the sampling protocol
(Appendix 5) and shall be analyzed by a DA accredited analytical laboratory except the
Regional Animal Feed Analytical Laboratory (RAFAL) of the endorsing Region;
G. Scrap book (Appendix 6) endorsed by the RSC shall be submitted to the NEC through the
National Secretariat for evaluation. The deadline for the submission of scrap books shall
be strictly enforced;
H. The NTC shall endorse the shortlisted nominees to the National Executive Committee
(NEC). The BOJ shall determine the winner based on the top three (3) nominees
submitted by the NTC
Outstanding Cassava Cluster
IV. SELECTION CRITERIA AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS

The interested cluster organizations are required to submit the following requirements:

A. Technical Requirements:
1. Average fresh tuber/root yield of the cluster area shall be at least twenty
(20) mt/hectare.
2. Minimum physical area of 50 hectares devoted to cassava production.
3. Laboratory analysis of tuber/roots; at least class B on the physical quality
B. Administrative Requirements:
1. Letter of Intent by the Cluster Farmer Cooperative/Association (FCA) signed by the
Chairperson of the Board of Directors/Trustees;
2. Endorsement letter from the any of the PA/MA/MAO/CA/CAO and RSC;
3. A cluster organization must have a complete set of officers, list of active members,
5-year farm cluster development plan approved by BOD/BOT and attested by
PA/MA/MAO/CA/CAO. The cluster development plan or action plan should have
the following components:
a. Executive Summary;
b. Description of the Cluster (Location, Farming System, Number of Farmers, etc.);
c. Detailed SWOT on the production system, postharvest facilities and
infrastructures, irrigation system, marketing system, and organization;
d. Vision and Mission Statements;
e. Objectives;
f. Strategies;
g. Annual Physical and Financial Targets and Major Activities for the next 3 to 5
years; and
h. Monitoring and Assessment;
4. It must be duly registered and valid during the evaluation period in any of the
following: Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)/ Department of Labor and
Employment (DOLE)/Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and DA Accredited
Civil Society Organization (DA-CSO);
5. Certificate of good standing or compliance from any certifying agency; and
6. The scrap book must be softbound (Appendix 6). An e-copy shall be submitted

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

V. REGIONAL SEARCH COMMITTEE (RSC)

A. The DA Regional Field Offices shall spearhead the formation of RSC, with the following
recommended composition:

Chairperson: Regional Executive Director/ Regional

Technical Director (Operations/Research and
Regulation)
Vice-Chairperson: ATI Center Director
Members: Field Operations Division Chief
Regional Agricultural and Fisheries Council Chairman or
Sector Representative
Agribusiness Marketing Assistance Division (AMAD) Chief
or Representative
Regional Integrated Laboratory Division Chief or
Representative Chemist
Regulatory Division Chief or Representative
Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Division (PMED) Chief
or Representative
Head Secretariat: Regional Cassava Focal Person
Members: Regional Corn, Cassava, Sorghum and
Soybean
Program Staff and Regional Agriculture and Fisheries
Information Section (RAFIS), PMED Staff

B. Responsibilities:
1. The RSC shall be responsible for disseminating information relevant to the Search
guidelines to all cassava cluster organizations in provinces, cities and municipalities.
2. The RSC shall be responsible for evaluating the performance of nominated cassava
cluster organizations based on submitted record books of vis-a-vis approved criteria
and guidelines (see item III).
3. The RSC shall endorse to the NEC through the NTWG the cluster organization with
the highest points earned (Appendix 4).

VIII. APPENDICES

Appendix 1. Strategic Plan Template Appendix

Appendix 2. Operational Plan Template
Appendix 3. Evaluation Scorecard for Cluster Organization Evaluation Sheet
Appendix 4. Score Card on the Evaluation of the Nominated Cluster Organization
Appendix 5. Sampling Protocol
Appendix 6. Contents of the Scrap Book
Appendix 7. Abbreviations
Appendix 8. Definition of Terms

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

 Appendix 1

STRATEGIC PLAN TEMPLATE

(3 – 5 Years)

I Name of Cluster
II Executive Summary
III Description of the Cluster
Location, Barangay, Farming System, Number of Farmers, etc.
IV Detailed SWOC on the following:
Production System, PHF & Infra, Irrigation System, Marketing System,
Organization
(Farmers capability, Knowledge of farmers on cassava production)
V Vision
VI Mission Statement
VII Objectives
VIII Strategies
IX 3-5 Year Physical and Financial Targets and Detailed Activities
X Monitoring and Assessment
XI Appendices

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

Appendix 2

OPERATIONAL PLAN TEMPLATE

(Within the Evaluation Period)

I Title of the Plan

II Goal
III Objectives
IV Annual Physical and Financial Targets and Activities
(Activities, Key Result Areas, Indicators, Timetable, Responsible Person,
Budget)
V Monitoring and Evaluation
VI Appendices

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

Appendix 3

EVALUATION SCORECARD FOR CLUSTER ORGANIZATION

EVALUATION SHEET

REGION
PROVINCE
CLUSTER NAME
ADDRESS
DATE

Rated by
(Printed name and signature)
Position/Designation
Date signed

SUMMARY EVALUATION CRITERIA (Cassava)

INDICATORS MAX PT (%) SCORE (%) REMARKS

I. Planning 5 5
Cluster Plan (5)
II. Operations 44 44
A. Cluster Competency (18)

1. Committed Farmer Members 5

2. Definition of the roles of the

cluster manager and officers. 3

3. Resolutions approved and

implemented by the Governance 5
Board during the evaluation period
4. Human resource competencies and
development in the cluster 5
organization
B. Networking and Collaboration (8)

1. Nature of cooperation with other

clusters/Government/ 3
NGOs
2. Business partnership 5
C. Internal Services (13)
1. Provision of Production & Post- 3
Harvest Services

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

 2. Provision of Credit (cash, inputs, 3
planting materials)
3. Value-adding Services among 2
participants
D. Other Achievements (5) All or nothing
(Awards Received by the Cluster)
III. Production 37 37
Cluster Accomplishment
1. Physical Accomplishments 10
2. Quality Accomplishments 10
3. Value-adding Activities 7
4. Marketing 10
IV. Financial 12 12
Cluster Financial Management (12)

1. Sources of Funds 4
2. Financial standing of the cluster
organization (To be based on the 8
Audited Financial Statement for the
previous year)

V. Community Engagement 4 4 All or nothing

VI. Bonus Points 5 5
A. GAP Certification 3 points max
B. Adoption of SCaPSA/SLRMA 2 points max
TOTAL 107

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

Appendix 4
SCORECARD ON THE EVALUATION OF THE NOMINATED CLUSTER ORGANIZATION

Overall
Indicators Remarks Maximum Points Weighted
Points
I. PLANNING (5 points)

1. Presence of Cluster ⮚ 3- 5 years Strategic Plan = 3 points

Strategic and Operational Plan ⮚ Annual Operational Targets and Activities = 2 Points 5
Period of Evaluation:
Calendar Year 2023

II. OPERATIONS (44 points)

A. CLUSTER COMPETENCY (18 points)

1. Committed Farmer Total number of members who planted cassava

Members ➢ 50 - 100 members = 1 Point
● List of members who ⮚ 101 - 150 members = 3 Points 5
planted cassava ⮚ More than 150 members = 5 Points
during the evaluation
period
2. Well-organized and Tasks and responsibilities of the cluster manager and
functional structure management team as well as day-to-day business and strategic 3 All or nothing
activities of the cluster should be well defined.
There should be a functional chart and manual of operations.

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

 Documentary support – Duties and responsibilities of managers
and officers, attested by the governing body.

3. Policy Resolutions approved A governance board or its equivalent to conduct decision making
and implemented by the relevant to cluster management in implementing the action plan.
Governance Board during the ● 1 to 5 resolutions = 2 Points
evaluation period. 6 and above resolutions = 5 Points 5

4. Human resource Sufficient human resources of the cluster in terms of the number
competencies and of external trainings and the experience of officers.
development in the cluster a. Organizational Management training = Maximum of
organization 2 Points (1 point per Training Title)
(for officials) - Appropriate trainings attended for the last 2 years (e.g.
leadership training, entrepreneurship, etc.)
b. Technical Training = Maximum of 3 Points (1 point
per Training Title) 5
(e.g. Trainings of Trainers, Techno Demo, Good Agricultural
Practices for Corn Season Long, Farmers Field School and other
corn related
Trainings, Simple bookkeeping)

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

 B. NETWORKING AND COLLABORATION (8 points)

1. Nature of cooperation with ⮚ Production support= maximum of 1 Points (1 point

other clusters/Government/ per collaboration)
NGOs (during the evaluation ⮚ Postharvest support = maximum of 1Points (1 point
period) per collaboration) 3

⮚ R&D collaboration = maximum of 1 points (1 point

per collaboration)

2. Business partnership (Farmer Approved marketing contracts (Purchase Order or Certification All or Nothing
Organizations from the buyer) with buyers. 5
and Processors/
Manufacturers)
C. INTERNAL SERVICES (13 points)

1. Provision of Production & Land Preparation and Planting Services (Cassava and Corn) =
Post- Harvest Services by the maximum of 5 Points
cluster organization Percentage of area served per year
o 30 and below –1 Points
o 31 to 50 – 2 Points
o 51 to 70 – 3 Points 4
o Above 71 – 4 Points
Post-Harvest Services = maximum of 4 Points 4
(in dried chips/granules) (Cassava)
o 25 tons and below – 1 Point
o 26 tons to 50 tons – 2 Points
o 51 tons to 70 tons – 3 Points
o 71 tons and above – 4 Points

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

 2. Provision of credit (Cash, inputs, planting materials) 3 All or nothing

3. Value-adding Services among

Services rendered (within the evaluation period) geared to
members address needs of the cluster members towards generating value
added products
● Training on Value Adding= 1 point 2
● Provision of Value Adding Facilities= 1 point
● Provision of Funds= 1 point
Market Development= 1 point
D. OTHER ACHIEVEMENTS (5 points)

1. Awards Received by the ⮚ Regional/Provincial/Municipal/City = 2 Points

Cluster ⮚ International/National Awards = 3 Points 5
III. PRODUCTION
A. CLUSTER ACCOMPLISHMENTS (37 Points)
1. Physical Accomplishments ⮚ Cassava Cluster Average Fresh Yield per hectare
(T/ha) = 5 Maximum Points
● 20 to 25 = 3 Points
● 26 to 30 = 4 Points
● above 30 = 5 Points
⮚ Physical Area Planted to cassava by the cluster = 50 ha 10
● 50 to 100 =3 points
● 101 to 150 = 4 points
● Above 150 = 5 points

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

 2. Quality ⮚ Refer to Cassava Standard/PNS-BAFS 29-2010
Accomplishments Cassava

A. Physical Quality of Dried Chips/Granules (5 points) (Based

on Color, Molds)
Class B-2 points
Class A-5 points
B. Chemical Quality (1 point per complied chemical analyzed) -
(3 points)
Moisture Content, Ash, and Fiber Content Refer to Cassava 10
Standard/PNS BAFS 119-2013Physical Quality of Fresh Cassava
(Refer to Cassava Standard/PNS BAFS ) (5
points)

Class II – 1 point Class I – 3 points Extra Class – 5 points

3. Value Adding Activities ⮚ Percent of produce/product processed 10 – 25 = 2
points
26 – 40 = 4 points 7 All or nothing
41 – 55 = 6 points
56 – 70 = 8 points
Above 70 = 10 points

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

 4. Marketing ⮚ Percent of produce/product link to market/buyers 10
– 25 = 2 points
26 – 40 = 4 points 10
41 – 55 = 6 points
56 – 70 = 8 points
Above 70 = 10 points

IV. FINANCIAL
A. CLUSTER FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (12 points)

1. Source of Funds ⮚ Internal fund only (Self-reliant organization) = 2

Points
⮚ Internal fund + Loan (should not be more than 30% of
the total asset) = 3 Points 4

⮚ Internal fund + Loan + External Funds (Grants) = 4

⮚ Points

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

 2. Financial standing of the Financial standing can be gauged by evaluating its assets against
cluster organization its liabilities to ensure sustainability of the cluster organization
(To be based on the Audited ⮚ Current Liquidity / Solvency Ratio (Current Assets:
Financial Statement for the Current Liabilities) = 2 Points (maximum) <2:1 = 1 Point
previous year) >2:1 = 2 Points
⮚ Debt Ratio = 2 Points (Total Liabilities: Total Assets)
<1:2 = 1 Point
>1:2 = 2 Points 8
> Total assets (fixed and current)
● Php 1M to 2M = 1 points
● Php 2.1 to 3M = 2 points
● Php 3.1 to 4M = 3 points
● above Php 4M = 4 points

V.COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT

Assistance to the natural calamity affected areas.

Donation/support to foundation. 4 All or nothing

VI. BONUS POINTS a. GAP Certified Farms = 3

b. Adoption of SLRMA/SCaPSA = 2 5

TOTAL 107

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

Appendix 5

SAMPLING PROTOCOL
Dried Chips or Granules / Fresh Cassava Tubers

CLUSTER

Farmer 1 Farmer 5
Farmer 2 Farmer 3 Farmer 4

Note: Samples must not be taken from the assemblers. It must not be mixed with other
cassava farmer’s product.

I. FIELD SAMPLING FOR FOOD

A. Competent representative from the Regional Regulatory Division should collect samples that shall
be delivered to the Integrated Laboratory Division or DA recognized laboratory for analysis.
B. Five sample plants should be randomly harvested at the inner portion of the sampling farm.
C. Using a shovel, dig a circle around the base of the plant. Dig up the entire plant and gently remove
the roots using sharp bolo/clippers, cut off the top of the plant.
D. Collect one tuber (medium size) from each sample plant (total of 25 sample plants per cluster).
E. Remove the soil from the roots as possible.
F. Sample roots should be immediately wrapped in aluminum foil, place in a polyethylene bag (4 mm
or thicker). It is necessary to wrap the sample in aluminum foil because polyethylene might
interfere with the integrity of the sample.
G. Samples must be well packed to maintain their integrity. They should be submitted as one, intact,
sample unit.
H. Sample must be well labeled for traceability purposes using permanent marker and readable,
taking note of the information on sample tags/code that goes with the sample such as:
1. Date of harvest
2. Variety of cassava sample
3. Cluster name
4. Location of cluster
5. Name of farmer
6. Address
7. Name of collector/sampler
I. Record all samples collected in the logbook.
J. Samples shall be brought immediately to the laboratory for analysis.
1. The collected samples should be brought to the laboratory and analyzed within the day.

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

 2. If the samples couldn’t be brought to the laboratory within the day, samples must be kept
in a cool place preferably in the refrigerator or container with ice pack taking care to
avoid contamination and must be brought to the laboratory the following day for
analysis.

II. DRIED CASSAVA CHIPS/GRANULES

A. Dried samples should be taken from the harvest of five (5) cluster members. Collect two
kilograms of dried samples from each member farmer.
B. Mix the collected dried samples and obtain 2 kilograms’ sample from the lot and place
in a polyethylene bag (4 mm or thicker).
C. Composite sample must be well labeled for traceability purposes using permanent marker and
readable, taking note of the information on sample tags/code that goes with the sample such as:
1. Cluster Name
2. Location of the Cluster
3. Name of Contact Person
4. Phone Number of Contact Person
5. Variety of Cassava Sample
6. Date of Packaging
7. Name of Collector

D. Record all information in the logbook.

E. Composite samples shall be brought to the laboratory for analysis.
F. Composite samples shall be analyzed on the physical and chemical qualities based on the PNS of
dried cassava chips/granules.

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

Appendix 6
CONTENTS OF THE SCRAP BOOK
Requirements for the Cluster Organization

Requirement
s
A. Letter of Intent signed by the Cluster Manager and noted by the
Chairman of the Board of Directors/BOT
B. Endorsement of any of the PA/MA/MAO/CA and RSC if awarded as winner
C. Endorsement of the RED
D. Certified true copy of Certificate of Registration and Certificate of Good Standing from
either of the following:
• Cooperative (CDA Registration)
• Association (SEC Registration)
I. Cluster Plan (Mandatory)
• 5-year Strategic Plan
• Annual Operational Plan
• Monthly/Quarterly targets and activities
II. Cluster Competency
A. List of members who planted during the covered period
• Ratio of full-time cluster employees to farmer members
B. Governance Board and Management Team
• List of members of the Governance Board
• List of the Management Team Members with their duties and responsibilities
attested by the Governance Board
• Composition of organizational membership (committee participants)
C. Resolutions approved and implemented by the Governance Board during the rating
period
D. Human resource competencies and development in the cluster organization
(For officers)
a. Management/ Leadership trainings
b. Technical trainings (production- postharvest related)
III. Cluster Accomplishments
A. Physical Accomplishments
a.1 Physical Area Planted (ha)
a.2 Average Root Yield (mt/ha)
B. Quality of Produce/Product
b.1 Physical Quality of Dried Chips/Granules
b. 2 Chemical Quality
b.3 Physical Quality of Fresh Cassava
C. Value –adding Activities
c.1 Percent of produce/product processed
D. Marketing Activity
d.1 Percent of produce/product link to market/buyers

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

 IV. Networking and Collaboration
A. Nature of cooperation with other clusters/Government/ NGOs
B. Business partnership
V. Internal Services
A. Provision of Production & Post-Harvest Services
B. Capability Building for Members
C. Value-adding Services among participants
VI. Cluster Financial Management
A. Sources of Funds
A.1. Internal fund + Loan + External Funds (Grants)
A.2. Internal fund + Loan (should not be more than 30% of the total asset)
A.3. Internal fund (Self-reliant organization)
B. Financial Standing of the Cluster Organization
B.1. Audited Financial Statement by the External Auditor
B.2. Current liquidity ratio
B.3. Debt Ratio
B.4. Total Assets (current and fixed)
VII. Other Achievements
A. Awards Received by the Cluster
VIII. Bonus Points
A. GAP Certified Farms in the Cluster
B. Adoption of SCaPSA/SLRMA

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

Appendix 7
ABBREVIATIONS

AMAD Agribusiness and Marketing Assistance Division

AMAS Agribusiness and Marketing Assistance Services
ATI Agricultural Training Institute
BAFS Bureau of Agriculture and Fisheries Standards
BAI Bureau of Animal Industry
BAR Bureau of Agricultural Research
BPI Bureau of Plant Industry
BSWM Bureau of Soils and Water Management
CA City Agriculturist
CAO City Agricultural Officer
CCC City Cassava Coordinator
DA Department of Agriculture
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
FOS Field Operation Services
FPOPD Field Program Operational Planning Division
GAP Good Agricultural Practices
HCN Hydrocyanic Acid
LGU Local Government Units
MA Municipal Agriculturist
MAO Municipal Agricultural Officer
MCC Municipal Cassava Coordinator
NSC National Steering Committee
NEC National Executive Committee
ppb Parts Per Billion (µg/kg)
PA Provincial Agriculturist
PAO Provincial Agricultural Officer
PCC Provincial Cassava Coordinator
PCAF Philippine Council for Agriculture and Fisheries
PNS Philippine National Standards
PSA Philippine Statistics Authority
PhilMech Philippine Center for Postharvest Development and Mechanization
PhilRootcrops Philippine Root Crop Research and Training Center
RAFC Regional Agriculture and Fisheries Council
RED Regional Executive Director
RCC Regional Cassava Coordinator
RAFAL Regional Animal Feed Analytical Laboratory
RSC Regional Search Committee
RTD Regional Technical Director
SCaPSA Sustainable Cassava Production in Sloping Areas
SLRMA Sustainable Land Resources Management Approach
SWOC Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

 Appendix 8

DEFINITION OF TERMS

Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)- also called manioc, yuca, balinghoy, mogo, mandioca, kamoteng-
kahoy, tapioca-root, and manioc root: a woody shrub extensively cultivated as an annual crop in tropical
and subtropical regions for its edible starchy, enlarged root. (PNS/BAFS 147:2015)
Cassava Production Cluster- a geographic concentration of cassava farms managed by farmer
organizations in an area of not less than 50 hectares, adjacent or contiguous.
Cassava Sample- a portion of cassava tubers randomly taken from a larger quantity or lot.
Cluster – refers to geographic area covered and managed by farmer cooperatives or associations.
Current Ratio – is the ratio of current assets to current liabilities.
(http://www.netmba.com/finance/financial/ratios/)
Cyanogenic glycosides – are secondary metabolites that are found in various plant tissues and produce
Hydrocyanic acid (HCN) upon hydrolysis, which may be toxic to humans and animals, the severity of the
toxicity depends on the quantity consumed.
Debt Ratio- the ratio of total debts to total assets.
(http://www.netmba.com/finance/financial/ratios/)
Effective area - is the size of the land used for agricultural operation, reported as many times as it was
planted to the same crops or different crops during the reference period.
Governance Board – responsible for overseeing the operations and in running the organization.
Hydrogen Cyanide or Hydrocyanic acid (HCN) – refers to total hydrocyanic acid which includes the
hydrocyanic acid which maybe enzymatically released from a cyanogenic glycoside as well as any free or
unbound hydrocyanic acid in cassava, expressed as milligrams of hydrocyanic acid per kilogram of
cassava by-products (mg/kg). It also refers to inherent chemical compound that contributes to bitter
taste in cassava. (PNS/BAFS 147:2015)
Net worth- (sometimes called net or wealth) – a measure of how much an entity is worth; the value of
total assets minus total liabilities
Physical Area- actual measurement of the land, reported only once regardless of how many times it was
used during the reference period.
Tubers/enlarged roots – A swollen or thickened, fleshy roots of cassava.
Operational Plan – Constitutes the cluster plan on the agribusiness enterprise for one year.
Strategic Plan - Constitutes the cluster plan on the agribusiness enterprise for 3-5 years.

Outstanding Cassava Cluster

 ANNEX 5. Coconut Farmer

Outstanding Coconut Farmer

 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING COCONUT FARMER

I. RATIONALE

Coconut is one of the country’s major agricultural industries, accounting for 3.6 million
hectares or about 26% of the country’s total agricultural land, planted with about 340
million bearing coconut palms spread across the country. On average, the country
produces 14 – 15 billion nuts annually, and based on the National Coconut Farmers
Registry System, there are about 2.6 million registered coconut farmers and farm workers
in the country.

Although the coconut is among the main drivers of the Philippine agricultural sector, the
industry is still plagued by challenges and problems, but despite the many constraints,
coconut farming has evolved into an agribusiness venture with the development and
marketing of coconut by-products such as coco sugar, Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO), and
coconut coir.

To recognize and honor the exemplary achievement of our coconut farmer, the
Department of Agriculture (DA) has included the Search for Outstanding Coconut
Farmers in the Gawad Saka and directed Philippine Coconut Authority (PCA) as its prime
movers. The Search will focus on the farmer’s skills and knowledge, the totality of the
farm, its physical attributes and productivity, and the farmer’s social contribution to their
respective community.

II. OBJECTIVES

a. To provide recognition to coconut farmers for their exemplary performance in coconut

farming;
b. To document success stories and best practices of coconut farmers in coconut-based
farming;
c. To showcase improved technologies and farmers’ innovativeness in farming,
processing, and marketing of their products;
d. To promote and accelerate the dissemination of cost-reducing and income-enhancing
technologies and workable techniques in coconut farm propagation

III. SCOPE

The search provides an award for the Outstanding Coconut Farmer (actual
producer/tiller) who successfully demonstrated exemplary performance in the
production, processing, and marketing of coconut products.

IV. QUALIFICATIONS OF NOMINEES

To qualify for the search under the Outstanding Coconut Farmer, the following
qualifications should be met:
a. Bona fide coconut farmer
b. Filipino Citizen
c. A farm area of not less than 0.5 hectare but not more than 5.0 hectares planted to
coconut with at least 50 palms to a parcel

Outstanding Coconut Farmer

 Definition of Coconut Farmer

The coconut farmer (actual producer/tiller) refers to any NCFRS-registered person who
directly tills the coconut farm and is engaged in processing the product and by-products
of coconut.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

1. Scrapbook – The nominee’s scrapbook shall be prepared by the nominee himself to

be assisted/guided by the PCA Coconut Development Officer (CDO) and the Municipal
Agricultural Officer (MAO), in the process of verifying and checking the correctness and
completeness of facts and figures contained therein.

The scrapbook should contain the following documents/information in the sequence

indicated below:

a. Table of contents;
b. Nomination form duly accomplished by the nominating officer (Form 1. Nomination
Form);
c. Profile of the farmer and the farm with two (2) latest 2x2 ID pictures (Form 2. Nominee
Data Form);
d. Evaluation Criteria (Form 3. Evaluation Scoresheet);
e. Farm Layout;
f. Income Tax Return certified by the BIR;
g. Farm documentation (relevant photos of the farmer and the farm with captions); and
h. Record/summary of operations, expenses, yield, and income per commodity within the
review year, following the matrix below:

COST AND RETURN

Commodity Yield Gross Income Cost of Net Income

(PhP) production (PhP)
(PhP)
1. Coconut (copra)
2.Coconut products & by-
products (pls specify)
3. Intercrops (pls specify)
4. Livestock & poultry (pls
specify)
5. Aquaculture
6.Other Enterprise (pls
specify)
TOTAL

1. Supporting Documents

a. Five-minute videotape of the farmer’s farming activities and related information;

b. Certification from the farmer’s respective Barangay Captain that the farmer is a Filipino
citizen, of good moral character, and a bonafide coconut farmer;

Outstanding Coconut Farmer

 c. Certification from financing institutions that the farmer has a good credit standing (if
applicable); and
d. Photocopies of all documents and materials indicating meritorious contributions and
accomplishments in the field of endeavor for the year under review.

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

Three (3) areas are considered in evaluating an outstanding coconut farmer, namely: a)
the farmer; b) the farm; and c) social contributions.
The evaluation criteria are as follows:

1. THE FARMER

a. Management Skills (Technology Development and Adaptation) – refers to the

ability of the farmer to develop and adopt technologies on coconut farm
management such as fertilization, pest management, post-harvest practices and
waste management in increasing coconut production
b. Farm Resource Management - refers to how the farmer utilizes his/her land and
available farm resources such as planting materials in order to optimize the
efficiency and effectiveness of farm resource leading to increased farm productivity
c. Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation - refers to the ability of the farmer to
adopt measures in his/her coconut farm to mitigate effects of emerging climate
change
d. Record keeping - refers to the farmer practice of keeping a farm journal that
documents the amount and sources of farm income and expenditures

2. THE FARM

Physical Attributes - refers to the total picture and general conditions of his/her farm
as affected by the farmer’s farming practices.

a. Farm Lay-out – refers to the assessment on how the farm is organized and
how the farmer plans and lays out his/her farm

b. Farm Sanitation - refers to the effort of the farmer to keep his farm free from
pests, diseases and pollutants. Also, an assessment on the cleanliness of the
farm as well as the soundness of the farming system in relation to human and
animal health

c. Farm Facilities – refers to the assessment on the number and condition of the
farm facilities (equipment, farm machineries, post-harvest facilities) being
used by the farmer

d. Productivity – measured as the ratio of agricultural output to agricultural

input which includes the yield, income and ROI

e. Yield – refers to the measure of the farmer’s coconut production level in nut
form for two consecutive years in relation to the regional average expressed
in percentage

f. Net Income – refers to the assessment on the return for every monetary unit
invested in the coconut enterprise (includes sales from copra, wholenut,
seedlings and coconut products and by-products such as charcoal, vinegar,

Outstanding Coconut Farmer

 sugar and others) and other farm enterprise (sales from intercrops, livestock,
aquaculture and others) expressed in hectare

g. ROI (Return on Investment) – Ratio of the proceeds from coconut and other
farm enterprises and cost of coconut and other enterprises production
expressed in percentage. The total expenses include labor expenses, cost of
planting materials, fertilizers, other agri-inputs, farm implements, equipment,
building and other farm expenses. The higher the ROI, the better is the
economic performance of the enterprises

The ROI is computed as:

ROI = Net Income

Total Expenses

3. SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION

a. Benefits to other farmers – refers to the farmer’s contributions to his/her

community that influence other farmers as well as benefitting them by creating
job

b. Community Involvement – refers to the farmer’s participation in various

farming organizations and government and non-government programs in
agriculture

c. Awards and recognition – refers to the awards and recognition received by the
farmer related to coconut farming and other award giving bodies 2 years prior to
evaluation year

Outstanding Coconut Farmer

 Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING COCONUT FARMER

NAME : __________________________________________________________________________

ADDRESS :__________________________________________________________________________

FARM LOCATION :__________________________________________________________________________

PROVINCE/REGION : __________________________________________________________________________

Justification/Reason for Nomination:

Nominated by : _____________________________________________________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name

Position : _____________________________________________________________________________

Address : _____________________________________________________________________________

Assisting Technician : _____________________________________________________________________________

Signature Over Printed Name

Outstanding Coconut Farmer

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

OUTSTANDING COCONUT FARMER

Recent 2x2 ID Picture

(2 copies)

FARMERS PROFILE

1. Name:____________________________________________________________________________________________
(Surname) (First Name) (Middle Initial)

2. Home Address: _________________________________________________________________________________

(Barangay) (Municipal) (Province)

3. Citizenship: ________________________ Sex: ___________________ Civil Status: ____________________

4. Date of Birth: ______________________ Place of Birth: ___________________________________________
5. Educational Attainment: _______________________________________________________________________
6. Name of Spouse (if married): _________________________________________________________________
7. Number of Dependents: _______________________________________________________________________
8. Tenurial Status: _________________________________________________________________________________

FARM PROFILE

1. Farm Location: ____________________________________________________________________________

2. Total Farm Area (ha.) ____________________ Total Coconut Area (ha.)
___________________
3. Narrative Description of the farm:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________
Signature of Farmer

Outstanding Coconut Farmer

 Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

OUTSTANDING COCONUT FARMER

Region : ___________________________________________Province: ___________________________________________

Name of Nominee/Candidate : ________________________________________________________________________

Address : _________________________________________________________________________________________________

No. of Years of Coconut Farming : ______________________________________________________________________

Standards:

a). Tenurial Status – Actual producer/ tiller

b). Land Area of Farm – Not less than 0.5 hectare, but not more than 5.0 hectares, planted
to coconut with at least 50 trees to a parcel.

Evaluation Criteria

MAXIMUM Rating
INDICATORS POINTS (%)

A. THE FARMER 35.00%

1. Management Skills (Technology Development and Adaptation) 20%

1.1 Fertilization

a) organic + inorganic 5.00

b) purely inorganic / organic 2.50

1.2 Pest Management

a) Practices Integrated Pest Management 5.00

b) Use of chemicals 2.50

1.3. Post –Harvest Facilities

a) 3 units or more 5.00

b) 1 – 2 units 2.50

1.4 Waste Management

a) with proper waste disposal/recycling facility 5.0

b) without proper waste disposal/recycling facility 2.0

2. Farm Resource Management 5%

2.1 Land Utilization Management (effective area for intercrops,

livestock, aquaculture & others)

Outstanding Coconut Farmer

 a) maximum (80%) 2.50

b) medium (60%) 1.50

2.2 Planting Materials

a) from own farm 2.50

b) from own farm and other sources 1.50

3. Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation 5%

a) Planting/Replanting + Fertilization
+ Soil Erosion Control 5.00

b) Planting/Replanting or Fertilization
or Soil Erosion Control 2.50

4. Record Keeping 5%

a) Complete farm journal 5.00

b) Incomplete 2.50

B. THE FARM 50.00%

B.1 Physical Attributes 20%

1. Farm Layout 10%

a) Highly organized 10.00

b) Moderately organized 7.00

c) Fairly organized 5.00

2. Farm Sanitation 5%

a) With Farm Sanitation 5.00

b) Without Farm Sanitation 2.50

3. Farm Facilities 5%

a) 3 units or more 5.00

b) 1 – 2 units 2.50

B.2 Productivity 30%

1.Yield of coconut in nut form per hectare for 2 consecutive years 10%

with reference to regional average

Outstanding Coconut Farmer

 75% or more 10.00

50% - 74.9% 7.00

Below 50% 5.00

2. Net Income per ha/year for 2 consecutive years 10%

a) Coconut Enterprise

> P40,000.00 5.00

> P25,000.00 – P40,000.00 3.00

≤ P25,000.00 2.00

b) Other Farm Enterprise

> P100,000.00 5.00

> P50,000.00 – P100,000.00 3.00

≤ P50,000.00 2.00

3. Return on Investment (ROI) for 2 consecutive years 10%

3.1. Coconut Enterprise

a) 75% and above 5.00

b) 35-74% 3.00

c) below 35% 2.00

3.2. Other Farm Enterprise

a) 75% and above 5.00

b) 35-74% 3.00

c) below 35% 2.00

C. SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION 15%

1. Benefits to other Farmers 10%

1.1 Technology Dissemination

a) Receives farm visitors and conducts demos 5.00

b) Receives farm visitors 2.00

1.2 Job Generation

a) 5 and above 5.00

b) 3 - 4 3.00

a) 1 - 2 2.00

Outstanding Coconut Farmer

 2. Community Involvement 3%

2.1 Affiliation with any farming organization (with Good Standing)

1.50

2.2 Participation in GOs/NGOs programs

(with Good Standing) 1.50

3 Received awards and recognition 2%

3.1 Received awards and recognition related to coconut 1.00

farming within 2 years prior to evaluation year

3.2 Received awards and recognition from other award 1.00

giving bodies within 2 years prior to evaluation year

TOTAL 100%

SUMMARY:

A. THE FARMER (35%)

B. THE FARM (50%)

C. SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION (15%)

TOTAL

Evaluated By : _____________________________________________________
Position : _____________________________________________________
Date : _____________________________________________________

Outstanding Coconut Farmer

ANNEX 6. Coconut Farmer
Organization
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING COCONUT FARMERS ORGANIZATION

I. RATIONALE

Coconut is one of the country’s major agricultural industries, accounting for 3.6 million
hectares or about 26% of the country’s total agricultural land, planted with about 340
million bearing coconut palms spread across the country. On average, the country
produces 14 – 15 billion nuts annually, and based on the National Coconut Farmers
Registry System, there are about 2.6 million registered coconut farmers and farm workers
in the country.

Although the coconut is among the main drivers of the Philippine agricultural sector, the
industry is still plagued by challenges and problems, but despite the many constraints,
coconut farming has evolved into an agribusiness venture with the development and
marketing of coconut by-products such as coco sugar, Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO), and
coconut coir.

The role of the coconut farmers organization is to empower the coconut farmers by
increasing productivity and income of the farm, developing entrepreneurial skills and
become competitive in terms of capacity building, coconut farming, value-adding, product
processing and marketing of coconut products and by-products.

To recognize and honor the exemplary achievement of our organized coconut farmers,
the Department of Agriculture (DA) has included the Search for Outstanding Coconut
Farmers Organization in the Gawad Saka and directed the Philippine Coconut Authority
(PCA) as its prime movers. The search will focus on the Coconut Farmers Organizations
(CFOs), Coconut Farmers Associations (CFAs), and Coconut Farmers Cooperatives (CFCs)
that have successfully demonstrated exemplary performance in developing
entrepreneurial skills and become competitive in terms of capacity building, coconut
farming, value-adding, product processing and marketing of coconut products and by-
products and shown excellent organization management, community involvement and
social contribution.

II. OBJECTIVES

a. To provide recognition to organized coconut farmers for their exemplary performance

in developing entrepreneurial skills and become more competitive in terms of capacity
building, coconut farming, value adding, product processing and marketing of coconut
products and by-products and shown excellent organization management, community
involvement and social contribution;
b. To document success stories and best practices of coconut farmers organization in
coconut-based enterprise farming;
c. To showcase improved technologies and farmer organization innovativeness in
coconut farming, processing, and marketing of their products;
d. To promote and accelerate the dissemination of cost-reducing and income-enhancing
technologies and workable techniques in coconut farm propagation and value-adding.

Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization

III. QUALIFICATIONS AND SCOPE

This Search shall cover PCA accredited Coconut Farmers Organizations (CFOs), Coconut
Farmers Associations (CFAs), and Coconut Farmers Cooperatives (CFCs) that are actively
engaged in coconut-based enterprise/s i.e., coconut intercropping, animal integration,
and coconut processing for the past three (3) years.

Definition of Coconut Farmers Organization

Coconut Farmers Organization shall refer to individual coconut farmers formed into
organizations, associations, and cooperatives wherein at least 50% + 1 of the members
are registered in the National Coconut Farmers’ Registry System (NCFRS), duly
accredited/registered to Philippine Coconut Authority.

IV. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

The nominees shall submit the following requirements for the evaluation on the
prescribed deadline, to wit:

1. Scrapbook – The scrapbook shall be prepared by the nominees themselves to be

assisted/guided by the PCA Coconut Development Officer (CDO) and the Municipal
Agricultural Officer (MAO), to verify and check the correctness and completeness of facts
and figures contained therein.

The scrapbook should contain the following documents/information in the sequence

indicated below:
a. Table of contents;
b. Nomination form duly accomplished by the nominating officer (Annex 1);
c. Information Sheet (Annex 2);
d. Coconut Farmer Organization documentation of success story (relevant photos of the
farmer and the farm with captions)
e. Record/summary of operations, expenses, yield, and income per commodity and/or
enterprise within the review year (Annex 3).

Supporting Documents

a. Five-minute videotape of the organization’s engagement in coconut farming, value-

adding, product processing and marketing and other enterprise/livelihood activities
and related information;
b. Certification from financing institutions that the farmer has a good credit standing (if
applicable); and
c. Photocopies of all documents and materials indicating meritorious contributions and
accomplishments in the field of endeavor for the year under review.

Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The nominees will be judged based on depiction of the actual field setting including
Organization and Management, Economic Activities/Performance, and Social
Contribution. The criteria include the following:

CRITERIA PERCENTAGE
DEPICTION OF ACTUAL FIELD SETTING
1. Organization And Management 30
2. Economic Activities/Performance 35
3. Social Contribution 35
TOTAL 100
*Annex 4. Evaluation Criteria Sheet

Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization

 Form 1.
NOMINATION FORM

Name of Coconut Farmer Organization : _______________________________________________________

Province/Region : __________________________________________________________________________________

Brgy/Municipality : __________________________________________________________________________________

Justification for Nomination:_____________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nominated by : __________________________________________________________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name

Position : __________________________________________________________________________________
Address : __________________________________________________________________________________
Assisting Technician : __________________________________________________________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name

Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization

 Form 2.

INFORMATION SHEET

Name of Coconut Farmers Organization : ___________________________________________________

Name of President : ___________________________________________________
Contact Information : ___________________________________________________
E-mail address : ___________________________________________________
Date Established/Organized : ___________________________________________________
Date Registered : ___________________________________________________
Name of Agency Registration : ___________________________________________________

I attest to all the facts stated herein and give my consent for an interview and verification of the
facts/information mentioned.

______________________________________________________
Name of President

______________________________________________________
Signature

Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization

 Form 3.

COST AND RETURN

Gross Income Cost of production

Commodity/Enterprise Net Income (PhP)
(PhP) (PhP)

Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization

 Form 4.
OUTSTANDING COCONUT FARMER ORGANIZATION EVALUATION SHEET

Region : ____________________________________________________________________________________________
Province: __________________________________________________________________________________________
Name of Nominee/ Candidate : ____________________________________________________________________
Address : ___________________________________________________________________________________________
No. of Years Established : __________________________________________________________________________

Evaluation Criteria
INDICATORS Rating
MAXIMUM
POINTS
(%)
MECHANICS AND CRITERIA: 100%
A. ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT (check one only) 30%
1. Years of establishment
1.1 with more than 5 years of coconut related social and 5
business activities/engagement
1.2 with at least 4 years of coconut related social and business 3
activities/engagement
1.3 with at least 3 years of coconut related social and business 1
activities/engagement
2. Years of dedication
2.1 with more than 5 awards or recognition on coconut related 10
social and business activities/engagement
2.2 with at least 3 awards or recognition on coconut related social 7
and business activities/engagement
2.3 with at least 1 award or recognition on coconut related social 5
and business activities/engagement
3. Number of members (establishment vs. present)
a) increase in membership 5
b) no increase in membership 3
c) decrease in membership 1
4. Transparency and Accountability
a) with proper bookkeeping 5
b) without bookkeeping 2
5. Affiliation with other related agencies
a) with 5 or more related agencies 5
b) with 3-4 related agencies 3
c) with less than 3 agencies 1
B. ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES OR PERFORMANCE 35%
1. Number of Production and Productivity
a) at least 30% increase of organization’s production and 10
productivity

Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization

 b) at least 20% increase of organization’s production and 8
productivity
c) at least 10% increase of organization’s production and 6
productivity
d) no increase of organization’s production 2
2. Number of High Value Coconut Products
a) with additional three (3) coconut-based enterprise 10
engagement
b) with additional two (2) coconut-based enterprise 8
engagement
c) with additional one (1) coconut-based enterprise engagement 6
d) only one (1) coconut-based enterprise engagement 2
3. Up-to-date Market Platform (Check all available)
a) with social media market platform 3
b) with partnership to delivery applications 3
c) with participation of local community or local market 3
d) with products displayed in One Stop Shops 3
e) with participation of government-initiated market such as 3
KADIWA
C. SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION 35%
1. Improved member’s income/benefit (establishment vs. present)
a) at least 30% increase of organization’s income 10
b) at least 20% increase of organization’s income 8
c) at least 10% increase of organization’s income 6
d) no increase of organization’s income 2
2. Effective technology transfer
a) with adaptation of at least one (1) new coconut-based 5
technology
b) with no adaptation of new coconut-based technology 2
3. Certification related in Agriculture
a) Has at least 1 valid certification (i.e. organic certification; 5
Learning Site for Agriculture; TESDA Farm School)
b) Has at least 1 previous certification yet not renewed in time 3
for nomination
4. Improved organizational viability and financial sustainability
a) at least 30% increase of organization’s profit 5
b) at least 20% increase of organization’s profit 4
c) at least 10% increase of organization’s profit 3
d) no increase of organization’s profit 2
5. Job Generation to the community
a) hired 10 and above employees 10
b) hired 5-9 employees 8
c) hired 3-4 employees 6
d) hired 1-2 employees 2
TOTAL 100%

Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization

SUMMARY:

MECHANICS AND CRITERIA:

a. Organization And Management (30%)
b. Economic Activities or Performance (35%)
c. Social Contribution (35%)
TOTAL

Evaluated by : ____________________________________________________
Position : ____________________________________________________
Date : ____________________________________________________

Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization

 DETAILED CRITERIA OF JUDGING AND REQUIRED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

GENERAL SUPPORTING
CRITERIA SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION SCORE 100
DESCRIPTION DOCUMENTS
with more than 5 years of Photo documentation,
coconut related social and Certificates of
5
business Participation for
activities/engagement Social and Business
with at least 4 years of Activities/Engagemen
Years of coconut related social and t
3
establishment business
10
(check one only) activities/engagement Arrange the scanned
with at least 3 years of certificates/photos
coconut related social and chronologically (if
business possible, to be
1
activities/engagement presented in 1-2
pages only) from year
1 to present year.
with more than 5 awards or Photo documentation,
recognition on coconut Certificates of
10
related social and business Recognition or
activities/engagement Awards for Social and
with at least 3 awards or Business
recognition on coconut Activities/Engagemen
Organization 7
Years of related social and business t
Management
1 dedication activities/engagement 5
(check one only) with at least 1 award or Arrange the scanned
recognition on coconut certificates/photos
related social and business chronologically (if
activities/engagement 5 possible, to be
presented in 1-2
pages only) from year
1 to present year.
increase in membership Roster of members
5 during establishment
Number of
and present
members no increase in membership 3 masterlist of
(establishment
decrease of membership 5 members, duly signed
vs present)
by the organization's
(check one only)
1 Secretary, duly signed
by the organization's
Secretary
Transparency with proper book-keeping Financial Statement
5 5 as of December 2023,
and

Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization

 Accountability without book-keeping duly certified by the
(check one only) organization's
2
Accountant.

with 5 or more related Certificate of

agencies 5 membership with the
Affiliation with affiliation with GOs,
other related with 3-4 related agencies NGOs, COs and other
3 5
agencies (check organizations in
one only) terms of financing,
with less than 3 related
1 marketing, trading,
agencies
etc.
at least 30% increase of Annual Report as of
organization's production 10 December 2023 on
and productivity production per
Number of
at least 20% increase of coconut-based
production and
organization's production 8 enterprise, duly
productivity
and productivity 10 certified by the
(check one only)
at least 10% increase of Chairman.
organization's production 6
and productivity
no increase of
2
organization's production
with additional three (3) List of operational
coconut-based enterprise 10 and income
engagement generating coconut-
Number of High
with additional two (2) based enterprises,
Economic Value Coconut
coconut-based enterprise 8 duly certified by the
2 Activities/ Products (check
engagement 10 Organization's
Performance one only)
with additional one (1) Chairman.
coconut-based enterprise 6
engagement
only one (1) coconut-based
2
enterprise engagement
from own farm of the
Raw materials 5
members
for the 5
from own farm of the
enterprise 3
members and other sources
Up to date with Social Media Market Photo documentation
Market Platform Platform (i.e. Facebook 3 per platform checked,
(check all Page) duly certified by the
15
available) with partnership to Organization's
delivery applications (i.e. 3 Chairman.
Toktok, Lalamove, Grab)

Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization

 with participation of the
3
community or local market
with products displayed in
3
One Stop Shops
with participation of
government initiated
market platform such as 3
KADIWA

Improved at least 30% increase of Income Assessment

10
member's organization's income during establishment,
income/benefit at least 20% increase of and Income
8
(establishment organization's income Assessment for CY
10
vs present) at least 10% increase of 2023, duly signed by
6 organization's
(check one only) organization's income
no increase of Accountant.
2
organization's income
with adaptation of at least Any additional
Effective
one (1) new coconut-based 5 practice/technology
technology
technology 10 on the coconut's Good
transfer (check
with no adaptation of new Agricultural Practice.
one only) 2
coconut-based technology
Has at least 1 valid Copy of certification.
certification (i.e. organic
certification; Learning Site 5
Social
3 Certification for Agriculture; TESDA
Contribution
related in Farm School) 5
Agriculture Has at least 1 previous
certification yet not
3
renewed in time for
nomination
at least 30% increase of Financial Statement
5
Improved organization's profit in the (specific)
organizational at least 20% increase of Coconut-based
4
viability and organization's profit enterprise
financial at least 10% increase of 5 nomination as of
sustainability 3 December 2023, duly
organization's profit
(check one only) no increase of signed by the
organization's profit 2 Accountant.

Job Generation the organization hired ten

10 5
in Community (10) and above employees

Outstanding Coconut Farmer Organization

 ANNEX 7. Sugarcane Farmer

Outstanding Sugarcane Farmer

 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING SUGARCANE FARMER

I. RATIONALE
The sugarcane industry historically is a major contributor to the Philippine economy in
terms of dollar earnings due to exports, employment generation both in the farm and
industrial sectors, taxes due to domestic sales of sugar and sweetened food products, and
income of sugarcane farmers, workers and dependents. Before, sugar was the only major
product being derived from sugarcane, but due to enactment of RA 9367 or the Biofuels
Law in 2007 and RA 9513 or the Renewable Energy Law in 2008, sugarcane became the
source of feedstock for bioethanol production and biomass power.
Sugarcane is being grown in more than 400,000 hectares covering 28 sugarcane growing
provinces. Sugarcane being harvested from these areas is raw material for sugar
production and feedstock for bioethanol production. Visayas region is the region of big
sugarcane plantations where 60% of sugar output is being produced.
The sugarcane industry provides livelihood to more than 99,000 sugarcane farmers,
where 88% are small farmers cultivating farms of 5 hectares and below. Also, more than
580,000 farm workers/laborers are employed in sugarcane farms, from land preparation
until harvesting operations. These farmers and workers are industry’s players who are
exposed to economic and environmental volatilities and yet do not stop producing
sugarcane, which is why we have sugar on our table.
For the past five cropping years, there has been a cycle of up and down in the production
of cane and sugar, and farm productivity as well. The unstable growth of farm production
and productivity can be traced to the following: 1) effects of declining sugarcane areas, 2)
increasing cost of inputs such as fertilizers, planting materials, service fees for farm
machineries, irrigation, and labor, 3) adverse weather condition and 4) highly acidic soil.
The average farm productivity of small farms is lower than the plantation-sized farms
because, capitalization-wise, these farmers lack adequate investment to grow sugarcane
efficiently. Most of the small farmers have no capacity to adopt the latest technologies
because it entails the high cost of producing cane. However, the Sugar Regulatory
Administration vows that its corporate thrusts and program will continue to improve the
livelihood of these sugarcane farmers.
The Gawad Saka for Sugarcane Farmer will search for outstanding sugarcane farmers to
prove that in whatever conditions, big or small in status, a farmer can produce more and
get higher income when the right things are done in the right way.
Farm productivity wise, they are the lowest compared to medium and big plantations. It
is against this backdrop that this activity is being conducted to search for those farmers
who are productively efficient in growing sugar cane.

II. OBJECTIVES

1. To document the management skills and cultural practices in sugarcane growing that
enabled farmers to achieve high farm productivity and profit.

Outstanding Sugarcane Farmer

 2. To give due recognition for exemplary performance of farmers which contributes to the
promotion on the long-term sustainability and profitability of sugarcane farming and
improvement of the living condition of their farm workers; and
3. To promote the best practices of the Gawad Saka Awardee to other sugarcane farmers in
other sugarcane milling districts-as a model to other farmers.

III. SCOPE
The search for outstanding sugarcane farmers is limited to farmers, either a lessee or
owner, of sugarcane farms with an aggregate area of not more than 25 hectares.
IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES
1. Must be a Filipino citizen.
2. With good moral character.
3. Engaged in the production of sugarcane for a minimum of five (5) consecutive years
preceding the search.

V. DEFINITION OF TERMS
By-product. A product from the manufacturing process of sugar that is not considered
the principal product.
Crop year. The annual crop cycle of sugarcane production which starts on September 1
of the current year and ends on August 31 of the following year. It is the period covering
all the activities from land preparation to harvesting of canes.
Farm productivity. The capacity of 1 unit of land (hectare) to produce sugarcane. Farm
productivity in sugarcane is measured in terms of tons of cane per hectare (TC/Ha) and
50kg bag of raw sugar per hectare (LKg/Ha).
High yielding varieties. A variety of sugarcane that can equal or exceed the yields of the
current commercially grown cane variety. These are the varieties bred and released for
commercial planting by the Sugar Regulatory Administration and Philippine Sugar
Research Institute, Inc.
Molasses. A by-product of the sugar production process in sugar mills. It is a thick syrup
left after the crystallized is removed in the milling process. Molasses is used as sweetener
or as sugar substitute, a feedstock for bioethanol production, animal feeds and for
pharmaceuticals.

Muscovado. Solidified cane juice is usually extracted by stone/steel grinders (tarapeche

for backyard production being moved by a carabao or by a mill (for commercial
production).
Plant cane. The first crop cycle of sugarcane after the original planting of seed cane. It
involves the growth and development of mature sugarcane stalks for the newly planted
cane sets or seed pieces.
Rate of fertilization. Amount in bags of different kinds and grades of fertilizers applied
to sugarcane on a per hectare basis.
Ratoon cane. The sugarcane plant that is allowed to grow from the stabbles after the
harvesting of the first crop cycle.

Outstanding Sugarcane Farmer

 Rate of Investment. Ratio of the net proceeds (sales from sugar and molasses less direct
costs including hauling cost less trucking cost) over the direct cost.
Sugarcane farmer. A person who is engaged in sugarcane growing whether lessee
and/or owner of the land.

VI. SEARCH RULES AND REGULATIONS

1. A sugarcane farmer who was judged as a national winner in the past in the same
category during the DA Annual Search for Outstanding Sugarcane Farmer shall no
longer eligible for evaluation and nomination.
2. The farmers-candidates for the award may be selected/endorsed either by the
sugarcane farmers’ cooperatives/associations, sugar mill, Mill District Development
Councils and Local Government Units (LGUs).
3. The Department of Agriculture (DA) and the sugar Regulatory Administration (SRA)
are not allowed to nominate and endorse potential candidates for Gawad Saka Award.
4. Nominations shall be filed using the prescribed form and must notarized accordingly.
5. The farmers-candidates must sign the nomination form as attestation that all facts
stated are true and correct and therein giving his/her consent to the independent
verification to be conducted by the National Technical Committee (NTC) which is
created for this purpose and indicating his/her willingness to attend the awarding
ceremonies if selected.
6. The farmers-candidates must show proof of records/documents of the following:

• Records of farm operations which include expenses such as costs of input used,
dates of each operation, volume/quantity of inputs used, proceeds in the sales of
sugar, molasses (a by-product of sugar), muscovado, canepoints, etc.
• Production report for the last two crop years issued by the sugar mill or
bioethanol distilleries.
• Certificate of residency issued by Barangay Chairperson.
• Birth certificate as proof of citizenship issued by the Local Civil Registrar or
Philippine Statistics Authority
• Certificate of good moral character issued by the Barangay Council.
• Proof of land ownership -either land title or contact of lease.
• Certificate that he/she is a sugarcane farmer for the last five years issued either
by the sugar mill, bioethanol distillery, Local Government Unit or Barangay
Council.
• Scrapbook, video tape and other documents for evaluation/validation.

7. Only qualified nominees as defined in Section IV and with complete scrapbooks and
records of operations will be considered for evaluation by the Regional Search
Committee.
8. Only one candidate shall be endorsed by each DA Regional Office to the Gawad Saka
Award for Outstanding Sugarcane Farmer.
9. The two (2) preceding crop years reckoning from the start of the search is the period
to be covered by performance assessment thru desk evaluation and field validation.
10. The national winner’s scrapbook, video tape and other documents submitted by
farmer-candidate for evaluation/validation by the National Technical Committee for
Sugar cane shall be returned to Gawad Saka National Secretariat.

Outstanding Sugarcane Farmer

 OUTSTANDING SUGAR CANE FARMER EVALUATION CRITERIA

I. The Farmer Maximum Points = 35

A. As Farm Manager
Knowledge and capability to undertake
1. Proper land preparation. For standing crops, consider adaptability of practices
(mechanized, non-mechanized or combination of both); soil type, topography,
soil moisture, presence of hardpan, frequency and depth of operation. For ratoon
crop, consider practices applied in the previous plant crop. Ocular inspection-
general appearance of the field, soil tilth and soil clods.

Maximum points=4 Score=____________________

2. Proper planting and replanting practices-use of HYVs, purity of variety planted

quality of seedpieces used, treatment of seedpieces, depth and density of
planting and replanting materials. For ratoon crop, consider practices applied in
the previous plant crop. Ocular inspection-general appearance of the field with
particular attention on missing hills for plant cane/stool survival for ratoon canes,
source of canepoints.

Maximum points=4 Score=____________________

3. Proper fertilization. Basis of fertilizer application: neighbor’s practice,

somebody’s advice, own practice or prevailing practice in the area. Farmer with
soil analysis report and follows recommended fertilization rate. Check the basis of
the farmer on its fertilizer protocol like timing and frequency of application.

Maximum points=4 Score=____________________

4. Proper cultivation practices. Consider kind (off-baring, hilling up and other

cultivation practices), time and frequency of operation. Ocular inspection-general
appearance of the field in the relation to occurrence and density of weeds, etc.

Maximum points=4 Score=____________________

5. Different pest and disease control options. Consider farmer’s familiarity with
common pests and diseases in the area and control measures/strategies being
undertaken. Ocular inspection-general appearance of the field in relation to the
occurrence and level of infestation including sanitation and preventive control.

Maximum points=4 Score=____________________

6. Proper harvesting and Post-harvest practices. Refer to farmer’s mill production

reports which reflect percent deduction from trash, muddy canes and burnt
canes.

Outstanding Sugarcane Farmer

 Maximum points=4 Score=____________________

A. >6% =0 pt 5-6% = 1 pt 3-4%= 2pts 0-2% =3pts

B. >50% green canes =1 pt > 50% burnt cane =0 pt

7. Farm records keeping. Consider the following:

Maximum points=4 Score=____________________

a.) Farm records for the past 2 years

b.) Farm plan and budgeting
c.) Farm expenses
d.) Sales of sugar and molasses
e.) Others, specify ________ (ITR)
B. As Innovator
Maximum points =4 Score=_____________________

• Enumerate appropriate farm innovations:

1) _________________________________
2) _________________________________
3) _________________________________
4) _________________________________

C. As Entrepreneur Score=________________________
Maximum Points=3

• List of additional income-generating activities

1) ____________________________________
2) ____________________________________
3) ____________________________________

Outstanding Sugarcane Farmer

II. The Farm Maximum Points= 50

Indicators Top yielder in the district National

I. Farm Productivity -Yield Score=______________

Score=______________
Relative to district’s top
Top performers and national
Average in LKg/ha

1-25% higher -12 points 1-25% higher -12 points

26-50% higher -13 pts. 26-50% higher -13 pts.

51-75% higher -14 pts. 51-75% higher -14 pts.

76% and above higher -15 pts 76% and above higher -15 pts

II. Farm Profitability

1) Return on Investment Score=____________________________

1-15% = 3
16-30% = 5
31-45% = 7
46-60% =9
61-75% = 11
76-90% = 13
91% and above = 15

2) Profitability -Ranking Score=_____________________________

Highest = 5
Middle = 3
Lowest = 1

III. Social Impact Maximum Points= 15

A. Assistance extended to farm workers: Score=_____________________________

Pls. specify: Max. points=5
1) ____________________________
2) ____________________________
3) ____________________________
4) ____________________________
5) ____________________________

Outstanding Sugarcane Farmer

 B. Civic, religious and education-oriented activities: Score=________________
Pls. specify: Max. points =3
1) ___________________________
2) ___________________________
3) ___________________________

C. Impact of farm and practices in the community: Score=________________

Max. points =4

1) _____________________________
2) _____________________________
3) _____________________________

D. Awards/recognition received: Score=__________________

Pls. specify: Max. points =3

1) ____________________________
2) ____________________________
3) ____________________________

Total Score=_______________________________

Please supply the following data for reference use:

District average yield (LKg/ha) =___________________
National average yield (LKg/ha) =___________________
Mill efficiency (overall recovery) = __________________

Outstanding Sugarcane Farmer

ANNEX 8. High Value Crops
Farmer (Vegetables, Fruits,
Plantation Crops)
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING HIGH VALUE CROPS FARMER-ACHIEVER

I. RATIONALE

High value crops have competitive returns on investment when traded in fresh from vis-
à-vis alternative investment opportunities. These crops are characterized by regular
niche market or potential domestic and/or export markets, command high prices, with
value added or are good foreign exchange earners. High value crops are also called non-
traditional crops or crops other than rice, corn, coconut and sugar.

High Value Crops Development Program (HVCDP) supports the country’s national
development plans of expanding food supply and/or alleviate poverty. It is focused on the
private sector particularly the farmers or high value crops, thereby, increasing their
contribution to economic growth, farmers’ income and consumer welfare.

The success of the HVCDP is hinged on the farmers’ investment in technology and
marketing of commercial crops. To recognize the importance of the role of the farmers,
the Department of Agriculture has launched the Search for Outstanding High Value Crops
(HVC) Farmers.

II. OBJECTIVES

The Search for Outstanding High Value Crops (HVC) Farmers aims to:

a. Recognize the outstanding contributions of individuals who demonstrated exemplary

leading performance resulting to increased farm productivity, improvements in crop
nutrient management and/or innovation in low post-harvest losses of high value
crops;
b. Document success and innovative practices of farmers engaged in the sustainable
production system, link to market and commercial-scale sales of high value crops;
c. Showcase technological improvements for high value crops that meet global food
safety standards, increased productivity, local food sufficiency or access to export
markets.
d. Accelerate the dissemination of cost-efficient technologies and workable producer-
consumer linkage mechanism, and provide the platform to scale, replicate, or expand.

III. SCOPE

The Search provides an award for Outstanding HVC Farmer who has successfully
demonstrated exemplary performance efficiencies in the production and/or effectiveness
in marketing of high value crops specifically in vegetables, fruits, and plantation crops.

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

 The HCV Farmer refers to a person who is of legal age, Filipino,
decides/manages/operates the farm planted with any of the High Value Crops
(vegetables, fruits, plantation crops).

Three (3) outstanding HVC Farmers will be selected and nominated for vegetables, fruits,
and plantation crops.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

To qualify for the Outstanding High Value Crops (HVC) Farmers, the nominees should be:

1. A Filipino citizen of good moral character as duly certified by the Barangay Chairman;
2. Must NOT be an employee of the Department of Agriculture;
3. A farmer by principal occupation and has been managing and utilizing not more than 5
hectares for HVC;
4. Must show proof of records or documents consisting of the following:
a. farm records
b. farm reports of operation
c. records on expenses and income of crops grown for a minimum of 4 cropping seasons
of vegetables, fruits, plantation crops; and production using urban agriculture
approaches immediately preceding the evaluation.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

1. Record book

The nominees’ record book should be prepared by the nominees themselves with the
guidance of an Agricultural Technologist (AT) of the locality. The AT will verify and
check the correctness and completeness of the records.

The record book must have the following format:

a. Table of contents
b. Nomination forms duly filled out by the nominating officer (see Form 1*)
*Nomination Form 1.a. (Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer for Vegetables)
Nomination Form 1.b. (Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer for Fruits)
Nomination Form 1.c. (Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer for Plantation
Crops)
c. Two (2) latest 2” x 2” pictures
d. Farmer and Farm Profile (see Form 2)
e. Management practices used in the farm / plant production record/ cost and
return analysis
f. Farm and crop photo documentations which show activities which need to be
highlighted

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

 2. Supporting Documents

a. Certification from the Barangay Chairman that the nominee is a Filipino citizen, a
non-DA employee, and of good moral character.

b. Income Tax Return (ITR) for the preceding two (2) years, duly certified by the
Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR).

c. Photocopies of all documents and materials indicating meritorious contribution,

accomplishments in the field of HVC (e.g. certificate of membership to farmer
organization).

d. Video recording (10 minutes maximum) of farmer’s farm, operational activities, and
other significant footages that need to be highlighted and given special focus.

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The three (3) major areas for consideration in the evaluation of Outstanding High Value
Crops (HVC) Farmers for Vegetables, Fruits, Plantation Crops are:

1. Farmer (Character, discipline, commitment)

2. Farm (farm/crop management system, bio-diversity/sustainable practices)
3. Social Impact (farmer’s contribution to the community)

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

Form 1.a. Nomination Form (Vegetable Crops)

OUTSTANDING HIGH VALUE CROPS FARMER

Name/Institution: _________________________________________________________________________________________
Address : _________________________________________________________________________________________
Province/ Region : ________________________________________________________________________________________
Contact Nos. :________________________________________________________________________________________
Landline: __________________________________________________________________________________________
Mobile : ____________________________________________________________________________________________
E-mail address: ____________________________________________________________________________________________

Justification for Nomination

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nominated by : ___________________________________________________________________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name
Position: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Address: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Assisting Technician: _____________________________________________________________________________________

Signature Over Printed Name
Position: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Address: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

Form 1.b. Nomination Form (Fruit Crops)

OUTSTANDING HIGH VALUE CROPS FARMER

Name / Institution: _______________________________________________________________________________________

Address: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Province/ Region : ________________________________________________________________________________________
Contact Nos.: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
Landline: __________________________________________________________________________________________
Mobile : ____________________________________________________________________________________________
E-mail address: ____________________________________________________________________________________________

Justification for Nomination

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nominated by : ____________________________________________________________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name
Position: __________________________________________________________________________________________
Address: __________________________________________________________________________________________

Assisting Technician: ____________________________________________________________________________

Signature Over Printed Name
Position: __________________________________________________________________________________________
Address: __________________________________________________________________________________________

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

Form 1.c. Nomination Form (Plantation Crops)

OUTSTANDING HIGH VALUE CROPS FARMER

Name / Institution: _______________________________________________________________________________________

Address : _______________________________________________________________________________________
Province/ Region : _______________________________________________________________________________________
Contact Nos. : _______________________________________________________________________________________
Landline: __________________________________________________________________________________________
Mobile : ___________________________________________________________________________________________
E-mail address: ____________________________________________________________________________________________

Justification for Nomination

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nominated by : ____________________________________________________________________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name
Position: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Address: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Assisting Technician: _____________________________________________________________________________________

Signature Over Printed Name
Position: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Address: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

Form 2. Nominee Data Form

Recent 2” x 2” Picture
(2 copies)
OUTSTANDING HIGH VALUE CROPS FARMER

Name : ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Address: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Farm Location: ____________________________________________________________________________________________
Municipality: ______________________________________________________________________________________________
Province/ Region: _________________________________________________________________________________________

A. Brief Background of the Nominee

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

B. Brief History of the Farm Enterprise

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

Form 2. Nominee Data Form

C. Access to Market
Market Destination
Domestic:
● Community market
● Trading post/”Bagsakan”

International

Others (e.g. Online)

D. Buyers
Type of Buyers Name
e.g. Wholesalers, contract growers, hotels,
supermarts
Domestic

International:
● Sales agent/Agent
● Direct Exporter

Others (e.g. Online)

E. Farm Management Practices Used / Plant Production Record/ Cost and Return Analysis
(ROI) (Please attach separate sheet if necessary):

a) Conventional Farmer’s Practice (plus add-on Innovations) Detailed Farm Activities. See B.b.
page 11:
1. Land preparation
2. Seeds/Seedling Establishment
3. Fertilization
4. Irrigation
5. Weeding
6. Pest Management

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

 7. Harvesting/Postharvest Practices
8. Marketing Practices
b) Actual Production Cost and Sales
c)_Return of Investment
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

F. Photographs

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

OUTSTANDING HIGH VALUE CROPS FARMER

Name: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Farm Location: ______________________________________________ Municipality: ______________________________
Province / Region: ________________________________________________________________________________________

POINT SCORES
INDICATORS
Scoring Max Score TOTAL
I. FARMER 35
A. Management Skills 7
a. Planning/ Record keeping
- Farm plan, budget plan and schedule of
3
farm operations presented
- No planning documents presented 0
b. Resource Generation
- Utilization of land, farm labor and capital
allocation
- Fully utilized 4
- Fairly utilized 2
- Under utilized 1
B. Technical Skills and Decision Making 20
a. Use of quality seeds/ planting materials
- Seeds/ Seedling Establishment, planting
materials sourced
from accredited supplier, self- 3
produced good seeds and use of
recommended varieties
- Seeds/ planting materials sourced
from non-accredited supplier and 0
use of non-recommended varieties
b. Land Preparation/ planting* 2
c. Fertilization* 2
d. Irrigation* 2
e. Weeding* 2
f. Pest Management* 3
g. Harvesting/ Postharvest Practices* 3
h. Marketing Practices* 3
*Based on recommended practices
C. Innovativeness 5
- 3 or more technologies/ innovations 5
- Less than 3 technologies/ innovations 3

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

 POINT SCORES
INDICATORS
Points Max Points TOTAL
D. Value Adding 3
- Farmer as processor 2
- Farmer as supplier of raw materials to
1
other processors
II. FARM 50
A. Farm Condition 8
a. Farm Plan and Crop/Farm Lay-out
- With farm lay-out 3
- Without farm lay-out 0
b. Farm hygiene and sanitation
- With compost pit, practices waste
segregation, proper disposal (used pesticide 5
cans/sprays/bottles,etc.
- Without compost pit, does not practice
0
waste segregation, proper disposal, etc.
B. Yield 13
Based on projected crop yield/ hectare/
commodity (PSA data)
>100% 13
97 – 99% 12
94 – 96% 11
91 – 93% 10
88 – 90% 9
86 – 87% 8
84 – 85% 7
82 – 83% 6
80 – 81% 5
78 – 79% 4
76 – 77% 3
75% 2
74% < 1
C. Return on Investment (ROI) 14
Based on theoretical computations
ROI of 100% 14
99 – 90% 13
89 – 80% 12
79 – 70% 11
69 – 60% 10
59 – 50% 8
49 – 40% 6
39 – 30% 4
29 – 26% 2
25% < 1

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

 POINT SCORES
INDICATORS
Points Max Points TOTAL
D. Sustainable / Climate Change
5
Adaptation
Use of balanced fertilization, applications of
organic fertilizer and macro/micro nutrients,
crop rotation practices, good drainage system,
cover
crops, etc.)
- 4 or more practices 5
- 2 - 3 practices 3
- 1 practice 1
E. Replicability and Mentorship 5
- three (3) or more farms adopt the
5
farming system
- two (2) farms adopt the farming
3
system
- one (1) farm adopts the farming
2
system
F. Good Agricultural Practices (GAP)
5
Certification
- GAP certified 5
- on-going application for GAP
3
certification
- Attendance to GAP related trainings 1
III. SOCIAL IMPACT (Farmer’s Contribution
15
to the Community)
A. Involvement in the community 7
a. Affiliation with agricultural related
community organization
- Membership in 2 or more agri-related
4
organization
- Membership in 1 agri-related
2
organization
b. Affiliation with civic/ community
organization
- Membership in 2 or more civic/
3
community organization
- Membership in 1 civic/
2
community organization

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

 POINT SCORES
INDICATORS
Points Max Points TOTAL
B. Impact of the farm and technologies in
8
the community
a. Farmer is a Trainer
- conducted 5 or more trainings or
5
lectures
- conducted 3-4 trainings or lectures 3
- conducted less than 3 trainings or
2
lectures
b. The Farm as show window or model
farm
- number of visits of organized groups (e.g.
lakbay-aral, etc.)
10 or more visits 3
5-9 visits 2
4 < visits 1
TOTAL 100

Outstanding High Value Crops Farmer

ANNEX 9.8. High Value Crops
Cluster
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING HIGH VALUE CROPS CLUSTER

I. RATIONALE

The Department of Agriculture, in collaboration with its attached agencies and bureaus, will
conduct the GAWAD SAKA Search for Outstanding High Value Crops (HVC) Clusters to
recognize their achievements in support of the development of the High Value Crops
industry. It aims to strengthen the partnership between the Department of Agriculture (DA)
and the HVC stakeholders in producing safe and quality High Value Crops and promote their
value chain approach.

The GAWAD SAKA AWARDS, spearheaded by the Department of Agriculture (DA),

recognizes and honors outstanding cooperatives and HVC farmers’ associations in the
agricultural sector. This award specifically acknowledges cooperatives and farmers’
associations with exemplary performance in High Value Crops farming, particularly those
that have achieved the highest yields and impacts to the stakeholders and the community.
The GAWAD SAKA AWARDS aims to inspire and motivate others to strive for excellence,
adopt best practices, and contribute to the growth and sustainability of the High Value
Crops industry.

The High Value commercial Crops refer to those crops that have competitive returns on
investment when traded in fresh or processed forms vis–a–vis alternative investment
opportunities. These products are characterized by defined regular or niche markets on
potential domestic and/or export markets, command high value adding processes and
prices or are good foreign exchange earners. High value commercial crops are also called
non-traditional crops.

Hence, this Guideline is being issued as a reference and guide for all DA Operating Units
regarding the implementation of the activity.

II. SCOPE

The Search is open to all established HVC cluster organizations and accredited as a Civil
Society Organization (CSO) by the DA (Regional/National).

The Outstanding HVC Cluster Award shall be given to the top HVC cluster organization that
has been involved and has exhibited exemplary performances in the implementation of
various projects and activities along the value chain.

III. GENERAL PROVISIONS

The Search for the Outstanding HVC Cluster shall have the following general provisions:

A. The nominee shall be eligible only upon compliance with minimum requirements as
defined in Section IV;
B. The nominated cluster organization shall submit a strategic plan (Appendix 1) covering
the evaluation period;
Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster
 C. The Regional Search Committee (RSC) shall use the scorecard on the evaluation of the
nominated cluster organizations (Appendix 3), and the summary of the Evaluation
Score Card (Appendix 2) to determine the top- performing HVC cluster;
D. The Regional Search Committee (RSC) shall endorse to the NEC their top HVC cluster
regional nominee;
E. The data on HVC production, area, and yield (for the past two years) shall be attested
by the PA/MA/MAO/CA/CAO;
F. Scrap books (Appendix 5) endorsed by the RSC shall be submitted to the National
Executive Council (NEC) through the NTC for evaluation. The deadline for the
submission of record books shall be strictly enforced;

IV. SELECTION CRITERIA AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS

The interested cluster organizations are required to submit the following requirements:
A. Technical Requirements:

1. The cluster average yield will be the sum of its principal HVCs (max top 6 HVCs based
on area size, and volume of production last 2 years), compared with the computed
three-year average (e.g., 2021 – 2024 data) of these crops in the particular region
where it belongs.
2. Minimum physical area of 75 hectares devoted principally to HVC production;
3. There should be RSBSA-registered farmers corresponding to the land area declared.

B. Administrative Requirements:

1. Letter of Intent by the Cluster Farmer Cooperative/Association (FCA) signed by the

Chairperson of the Board of Directors/Trustees;
2. Endorsement letter either from the PA/MA/MAO/CA/CAO, and RSC;
3. A cluster organization must have a complete set of officers, list of active members, 5-
year farm cluster development plan or action plan approved by BOD/BOT,
concurred by PA/MA/CA, and endorsed to DA-RFO for reference. The cluster
development plan or action plan should have the following components:
a) Executive Summary;
b) Description of the Cluster (Location, Farming System, Number of Farmers,
etc.); Describe where the Cluster falls under, or combination of:
1. Adoption of same Package of Technology (POT) for a specific HVC
to manage productivity and address integrated pest management;
2. Adoption of synchronized HVC production schedule harvesting
and crop rotation schedule;
3. Single HVC commodity-focused with integration to value chain.

c) Detailed SWOT on the production system, postharvest facilities and

infrastructures, irrigation system, marketing system, and organization;
d) Vision and Mission Statements;
e) Objectives;
f) Strategies;
g) Annual Physical and Financial Targets and Major Activities for the next 3 to 5
years; and
h) Monitoring and Assessment;
4. It must be duly registered and valid during the evaluation period in any of the
Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster
 following: Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)/ Department of Labor and
Employment (DOLE)/Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and DA Accredited
Civil Society Organization (DA-CSO);
5. Certificate of good standing or compliance from any certifying agency; and
6. The scrap book must be softbound (Appendix 5). An e-copy shall be submitted.

V. REGIONAL SEARCH COMMITTEE (RSC)

A. Composition

DA Regional Field Offices shall spearhead the formation of RSC, with the following recommended
composition:

Chairperson: Regional Executive Director/ Regional Technical Director

(Operations/Research and Regulation)
Vice-Chairperson: ATI Center Director
Members: Field Operations Division Chief
Regional HVCDP Coordinator
Regional Agricultural and Fisheries Council Chairperson or
Sector Representative
Agribusiness Marketing Assistance Division (AMAD) Chief
or Representative
Regulatory Division Chief or Representative
Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Division (PMED) Chief or
Representative
Head Secretariat: Regional HVCDP Coordinator
Members: Regional HVCDP Report Officer, Program Staff and Regional
Agriculture and Fisheries Information
Section, PMED Staff

B. Responsibilities

1. The RSC shall be responsible for disseminating information relevant to the Search
guidelines to all cluster organizations in the covered provinces, cities and
municipalities;
2. The RSC shall be responsible for evaluating the performance of nominated HVC cluster
organizations based on submitted record books vis-a-vis approved criteria and
guidelines (see item III); and
3. The RSC shall endorse to the NEC through the NTC the cluster organization with the
highest points garnered.

VI. APPENDICES

Appendix 1. Strategic Plan Template

Appendix 2. Evaluation Sheet Summary
Appendix 3. Evaluation Scorecard
Appendix 4. Cluster Composition
Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster
 Appendix 5. Contents of the Scrap Book
Appendix 6. Abbreviations
Appendix 7. Definition of Terms

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 STRATEGIC PLAN TEMPLATE
(3 - 5 years)

I Name of Cluster

II Executive Summary

III Description of the Cluster, Location, Farming System, Number of Farmers, etc.
Describe where the Cluster falls under, or combination of:
1. Adoption of same Package of Technology (POT) for a
specific HVC to manage productivity and address
integrated pest management;
2. Adoption of synchronized HVC production schedule
harvesting and crop rotation schedule;
3. Single HVC commodity-focused with integration to value
chain.

IV Detailed SWOT on the following:

Production System, Postharvest facilities and infrastructure, Irrigation
System, Marketing System, Organization (Farmers’ capacity, knowledge of
farmers)

V Vision Statement

VI Mission Statement

VII Objectives

VIII Strategies

IX Yearly Physical and Financial Targets and Major Activities

X Monitoring and Assessment

XI Annexes

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 OPERATIONAL PLAN TEMPLATE
(Within the Evaluation Period)

I Title of the Plan

I Goal
I
I Objectives
I
I
I Annual Physical and Financial Targets and Activities
V
(Activities, Key Result Areas, Indicators, Timetable,
Responsible Person, Budget)
V Monitoring and Evaluation
V Appendices
I

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

APPENDIX 2.

SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING HVC CLUSTER

EVALUATION SHEET SUMMARY

REGION
PROVINCE
CLUSTER NAME
ADDRESS
DATE

Rated by (Printed name and signature)

Position/Designation
Date signed

SUMMARY EVALUATION CRITERIA

MAX SCO
INDICATORS REMARKS
PT RE
(%) (%
)
I. Planning 5 5
Cluster Plan (5
)
II. Operations 44 4
4
A. Cluster Competency (1
8)
1. Committed Farmer Members
5
2. Definition of the roles of the
cluster manager and 3
officers.
3. Resolutions approved and
implemented by the 5
Governance Board during
the evaluation period.
4. Human resource
competencies and 5
development in the cluster
organization
B. Networking and
(8
Collaboration
)
Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster
 1. Nature of cooperation with
other clusters/Government/ 3
NGOs
2. Business partnership 3
C. Scope of Business Operations (1
5)
A. Presence of Multiple
8
Enterprise
B. Internal Social Services

C. Provision of Credit (cash,

3
inputs, planting materials)
D. Provision of Production &
Post-Harvest Services

D. Other Achievements
(5 All or nothing
(Awards Received by the Cluster) )
III. Production 37 3
7
Cluster Accomplishment
1. Physical Accomplishments 10
2. Quality Accomplishments 10
3. Value-adding Activities 7
4. Marketing 10
IV. Financial 12 1
2
Cluster
(12)
Financial
Management
1. Sources of Funds 4
2. Financial standing of the
cluster organization (To be
based on the Audited 8
Financial Statement for the
previous year)
V. Community Engagement 4 4 All or nothing
VI. Bonus Points 5 5
A. GAP Certification 3 points
max
B. Adoption of Organic System 2 points
max
TOTAL 107 107

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 APPENDIX 3.

SCORECARD ON THE EVALUATION OF THE NOMINATED CLUSTER ORGANIZATION

Overall
Indicators Remarks Maximum Points Weighted
Points
I. PLANNING (5 points)

4. Presence of Cluster ⮚ 3- 5 years Strategic Plan = 3 points

Strategic and ⮚ Annual Operational Targets and Activities = 2 Points
Operational Plan Period 5
of Evaluation:
Calendar Year 2024

II. OPERATIONS (44 points)

A. CLUSTER COMPETENCY (18 points)

1. Committed Farmer Total number of members who planted HVC

Members ➢ 50 - 100 members = 1 Point
● List of members who 5
⮚ 101 - 150 members = 3 Points
planted HVC during
⮚ More than 150 members = 5 Points
the evaluation
period
2. Well-organized and Tasks and responsibilities of the cluster manager and
functional structure management team as well as day-to-day business and strategic
activities of the cluster should be well defined. 3 All or nothing
There should be a functional chart and manual of operations.

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 Documentary support – Duties and responsibilities of managers
and officers, attested by the governing body.

3. Policy Resolutions A governance board or its equivalent to conduct decision

approved and implemented making relevant to cluster management in implementing the
by the Governance Board action plan.
during the evaluation period. ● 1 to 5 resolutions = 2 Points 5

6 and above resolutions = 5 Points

4. Human resource Sufficient human resources of the cluster in terms of the number
competencies and of external trainings and the experience of officers.
development in the cluster
a. Organizational Management training =
organization
Maximum of 2 Points (1 point per Training
(for officials) Title)

- Appropriate trainings attended for the last 2 years (e.g.

leadership training, entrepreneurship, etc.) 5

b. Technical Training = Maximum of 3 Points (1

point per Training Title)

(e.g. Trainings of Trainers, Techno Demo, Good Agricultural

Practices for HVC Season Long, Farmers Field School and other
HVC related
Trainings, Simple bookkeeping)

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

B. NETWORKING AND COLLABORATION (8 points)

1. Nature of cooperation with ⮚ Production support= maximum of 1 Point (1

other clusters/Government/ point per collaboration)
NGOs (during the evaluation ⮚ Postharvest support = maximum of 1 Point (1
period) point per collaboration) 3
⮚ R&D collaboration = maximum of 1 point (1
point per collaboration)

2. Business partnership Approved marketing contracts (Purchase Order or All or Nothing

(Farmer Organizations Certification from the buyer) with buyers. 3
and Processors/
Manufacturers)
C. INTERNAL SERVICES (13 points)

1. Provision of Production & Land Preparation and Planting Services = maximum of 5

Post- Harvest Services by the Points
cluster organization Percentage of area served per year
o 30 and below –1 Point
o 31 to 50 – 2 Points
o 51 to 70 – 3 Points 4
o Above 71 – 4 Points
4
Post-Harvest Services = maximum of 4 Points
o 25 tons and below – 1 Point
o 26 tons to 50 tons – 2 Points
o 51 tons to 70 tons – 3 Points
o 71 tons and above – 4 Points

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 2. Provision of credit (Cash, inputs, planting materials) All or nothing
3
3. Value-adding Services Services rendered (within the evaluation period) geared to
among members address needs of the cluster members towards generating value
added products
● Training on Value Adding= 1 point 2
● Provision of Value Adding Facilities= 1 point
● Provision of Funds= 1 point
● Market Development= 1 point
D. OTHER ACHIEVEMENTS (5 points)

1. Awards Received by the ⮚ Regional/Provincial/Municipal/City = 2 Points

Cluster ⮚ International/National Awards = 3 Points 5

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 III. PRODUCTION
A. CLUSTER ACCOMPLISHMENTS (37 Points)

1. Physical Accomplishments ⮚ HVC Cluster Average Fresh Yield per hectare

(Based on 2 y. ave. yield of specific HVC per region)
(Refer to Attachments 1 & 2)
(% of ave yield/region) = 5 Maximum Points
● 0 to 90 = 0 Point
● 90 to 95 = 3 Points
● 96 to 100 = 4 Points 10
● above 100 = 5 Points

⮚ Physical Area Planted to HVC by the cluster

● 50 to 100 = 3 points
● 101 to 150 = 4 points
● Above 150 = 5 points
2. Quality
Accomplishments Based on Quality Standards
applicable to specific HVC:

● Lowest = 0 Point
● 2nd Lowest = 4 Points 10
● 2nd Highest = 6 Points
● Highest = 10 Points

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 3. Value Adding Activities ⮚ Percent of produce/product processed
10 – 25 = 2 points
26 – 40 = 4 points 7
41 – 55 = 6 points
56 – 70 = 8 points
Above 70 = 10 points

4. Marketing ⮚ Percent of produce/product link to market/buyers

10 – 25 = 2 points
26 – 40 = 4 points
41 – 55 = 6 points 10
56 – 70 = 8 points
Above 70 = 10 points

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 IV. FINANCIAL
A. CLUSTER FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (12 points)

1. Source of Funds ⮚ Internal fund only (Self-reliant organization) = 2 Points

⮚ Internal fund + Loan (should not be more than 30% of
the total asset) = 3 Points
4
⮚ Internal fund + Loan + External Funds (Grants) = 4
Points

2. Financial standing of the Financial standing can be gauged by evaluating its assets against
cluster organization its liabilities to ensure sustainability of the cluster organization
(To be based on the Audited ⮚ Current Liquidity / Solvency Ratio (Current Assets:
Financial Statement for the Current Liabilities) = 2 Points (maximum)
previous year) ⮚ <2:1 = 1 Point
>2:1 = 2 Points
8
⮚ Debt Ratio = 2 Points (Total Liabilities: Total
Assets)
<1:2 = 1 Point
>1:2 = 2 Points
> Total assets (fixed and current)
● Php 1M to 2M = 1 point
● Php 2.1 to 3M = 2 points
● Php 3.1 to 4M = 3 points
● above Php 4M = 4 points

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 V. COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT

Assistance to the natural calamity affected areas.

Donation/support to foundation. 4 All or nothing

VI. BONUS POINTS a. GAP Certified Farms = 3

b. Adoption of Organic System= 2 5

TOTAL 107

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

Appendix 4

CLUSTER

Farmer 1 Farmer 5
Farmer 2 Farmer 3 Farmer 4

Note: Samples must be strictly taken from the new harvest of farmer members within the
cropping season.

SAMPLING OF HVC

1. HVC samples (14% MC) should be taken from the harvest of five (5) farmer members.
Collect two kilograms of samples from each member farmer.
2. Mix the collected samples and obtain 2 kilograms’ composite sample from
the lot and place in a polyethylene bag (4 mm or thicker).
3. Composite sample of the cluster must be properly labeled for traceability purposes using
permanent marker and readable, taking note of the information on sample tags/code
that goes with the sample such as:
a. Cluster Name
b. Location of the Cluster
c. Name of Contact Person(s)
d. Phone Number of the Contact Person(s)
e. Variety of HVC Sample
f. Date of Packaging
g. Name of Collector

4. Record all information in the logbook.

5. Cluster samples shall be brought to the laboratory for analysis.
6. Cluster samples shall be analyzed on the physical and chemical qualities based on the
PNS of specific HVCs. (Attached)

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

APPENDIX 5.

CONTENTS OF THE SCRAP BOOK

Requirements for the Cluster Organization

Requirements

A. Letter of Intent signed by the Cluster Manager and noted by the Chairman of the Board of
Directors/BOT
B. Endorsement of the MA/CA and or PA
C. Endorsement of the RED
D. Certified true copy of Certificate of Registration and Certificate of Good Standing from
either of the following:
● Cooperative (CDA Registration)
● Association (SEC Registration)

I. Cluster Plan (Mandatory)

● 3 - year Strategic Plan
● Annual Operational Plan (Current)

II. Cluster Competency

A. List of members who planted HVC during the covered period
● Ratio of full-time cluster employees to farmer members
B. Governance Board and Management Team
● List of members of the Governance Board
● List of the Management Team Members with their duties and responsibilities
attested by the Governance Board
● Composition of organizational membership (committee participants)
C. Resolutions approved and implemented by the Governance Board during the rating
period
D. Human resource competencies and development in the cluster organization (for
officers)
a. Management/ Leadership trainings
b. Technical trainings (production- postharvest related)
E. Capability of Members
III. Cluster Accomplishments
a. Physical Accomplishments
a.1 Physical Area Planted (ha)
a.2 Ave. Yield Per Hectare (mt/ha) per HV crop
b. Quality Accomplishments
b.1 Physical Quality of HVC
b.2 Chemical Quality
c. Value Adding Activities
c.1 Percent of produce/product processed
d. Marketing Activities
d.1 Percentage of produce/products
d.2 Coverage of market
Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster
 IV. Networking and Collaboration
a. Nature of cooperation with other clusters/org.
b. Business partnership

V. Internal Services
o Provision of Production & Post-Harvest Services
o Capability Building for Members
o Value-adding Services among participants
VI. Cluster Financial Management
● Sources of Funds
a. Internal fund + Loan + External Funds (Grants)
b. Internal fund + Loan (should not be more than 30
c. Internal fund (Self-reliant organization)
● Financial Standing of the Cluster Organization
a. Audited Financial Statement by the External Aud
b. Current liquidity ratio
c. Debt Ratio
d. Total Assets

VI. Other Achievements

• Awards Received by the Cluster Organization

VIII. Bonus Points

● GAP Certified Farms in the Cluster (Profile)
● Adoption of Organic farm system/certification

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

APPENDIX 6.
ABBREVIATIONS

AMAD Agribusiness and Marketing Assistance Division

AMAS Agribusiness and Marketing Assistance Services
ATI Agricultural Training Institute
BAFS Bureau of Agriculture and Fisheries Standards
BAI Bureau of Animal Industry
BAR Bureau of Agricultural Research
BPI Bureau of Plant Industry
BSWM Bureau of Soils and Water Management
CA City Agriculturist
CAO City Agricultural Officer
CCC City Corn Coordinator
CSO Civil Society Organization
DA Department of Agriculture
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
FOS Field Operation Services
FPOPD Field Program Operational Planning Division
GAP Good Agricultural Practices
LGU Local Government Units
MA Municipal Agriculturist
MAO Municipal Agricultural Officer
MCC Municipal Corn Coordinator
NSC National Steering Committee
NEC National Executive Committee
NTWG National Technical Working Group
ppb Parts Per Billion (µg/kg)
PA Provincial Agriculturist Officer
PAO Provincial Corn Coordinator
PCC
PCAF Philippine Council for Agriculture and Fisheries
PNNS Philippine National Standards
PSA Philippine Statistics Authority
PhilMech Philippine Center for Postharvest Development and Mechanization
RAFC Regional Agriculture and Fisheries Council
RED Regional Executive Director
RCC Regional Corn Coordinator
RAFAL Regional Animal Feed Analytical Laboratory
RSC Regional Search Committee
RTD Regional Technical Director
SLRMA Sustainable Land Resources Management Approach
SWOC Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 APPENDIX 7.
DEFINITION OF TERMS

HVC Production Cluster- a geographic concentration of HVC farms managed by farmer organization in
an area of not less than 75 hectares, adjacent or contiguous.

HVC Sample- a portion of high value crop randomly taken from a larger quantity or lot.

Cluster – refers to geographic area covered and managed by farmer cooperative or association.

Current Ratio – is the ratio of current assets to current liabilities.

(http://www.netmba.com/finance/financial/ratios/)

Debt Ratio- the ratio of total debts to total assets.

(http://www.netmba.com/finance/financial/ratios/)

Effective area - is the size of the land used for agricultural operation, reported as many times as it was
planted to the same crops or different crops during the reference period.

Governance Board – responsible for the overseeing the operations and in running the organization.

Net worth- (sometimes called net or wealth) – a measure of how much an entity is worth; the value
of total assets minus total liabilities

Physical Area- actual measurement of the land, reported only once regardless of how many times it
was used during the reference period.

Strategic Plan - Constitutes the cluster plan on the agribusiness enterprise for three (3) years.

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

ATTACHMENT 1

Philippine National Standard for High Value Crops

Ampalaya
For consideration:
- Maturity, freshness, firmness, cleanliness, wholeness
- Absence of mechanical damages (bruises, scars, cuts)
Extra class
Ampalaya in this class must be of superior quality and have the characteristic of the
variety and/or commercial type. It must be whole, fresh, clean, firm, well-formed, well-colored,
not over-mature, free of decay, sunscald, bruises, and free of damages caused by disease, insect
and mechanical or other means. Very slight superficial defects are allowed, provided these do
not affect the general appearance of the produce, the quality, the keeping quality and
presentation in the package.

Class I
Ampalaya in this class must be of good quality and have the characteristic of the variety
and/or commercial type. It must be whole, fresh, clean, firm, fairly well-colored, not badly
misshapen, not over-mature and which is reasonably free of decay, sunscald, bruises, and free
of damages caused by disease, insect, mechanical or other means. Slight defects are allowed,
provided these do not affect the general appearance of the produce, the quality, the keeping
quality and presentation in the package.

Class II
This class includes ampalaya which do not qualify for inclusion in the higher classes,
but satisfies the minimum requirements.

Banana (Saba, Cardaba)

For consideration:
- Cleanliness
- Absence of insect pests, diseases, molds, and other contaminants
- Chemical process for ripening conforms with PNS/SAO 74
- Pesticide residues meet requirements of the Codex Alimentarius Commission Vol. 2
Extra class
Bananas in this class must be of superior quality. Hands of one variety are mature,
clean, well formed, well-trimmed and free from decay, split fingers, loose fingers, bruises,
blemishes and discoloration caused by diseases, insects, latex burn, mechanical or other means.

Class I
Bananas in this class must be of good quality. Hands of one variety are mature, clean,
well formed, well-trimmed and free from decay, split fingers, bruises, blemishes and
discoloration caused by diseases, insects, latex burn, mechanical or other means.

Class II
Bananas in this class which do not qualify for inclusion in the higher classes but satisfy
the minimum requirements. Hands of one variety are mature, reasonably clean, fairly well-

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 formed, well-trimmed and relatively free from decay, split fingers, loose fingers, bruises,
blemishes and discoloration caused by scars, diseases, insects and mechanical or other means.

Broccoli
For consideration:
- Shape, bunch head size
- Compactness, cleanliness, degree of trimming
- Absence of mechanical damage
- Absence of insect pests and diseases
Grade 1
Bunch shall be clean and generally compact. The bunch stem must be closely trimmed to well-
trimmed. It should be free from damage due to overmaturity, discoloration of bud clusters,
cuts, decay, compression, insect damage.

Grade 2
Consists of heads of broccoli which meet the requirements for the Grade 1 except that the
bunch heads are fairly well-trimmed to closely well-trimmed, as well as or the increased
tolerances for defects.

Unclassified
Consists of broccoli that has not been classified in accordance with either of the Grades.

Classification Bunch head diameter (cm)

Small 6-7
Medium 8.10
Large 11-12
Extra Large >12

Cacao
For consideration:
- Odor
- Size uniformity
- Extent of fermentation and moisture
- Ripeness, cleanliness
- Absence of broken beans, fragments, and pieces of shell
- Absence of adulteration and foreign matter
- Absence of insect pests
- Moisture content of beans (<7.5%)
- Consignment of bean (<2.5% waste by weight)
Cacao beans are graded, according to the proportion of defective beans determined
by the method of test specified in ISO/R1114.

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 Percentage of beans
Grade Bean count Mouldy Salty Defects
(per 100 g) (insect damage, infested
beans, germinated
beans)
1A < = 100 3 3 2.5
1B 101 – 120 3 3 2.5
2A < = 100 4 8 5.0
2B 101 - 120 4 8 5.0

Sub-standard >4 >8 > 5.0

Coffee (green coffee beans)

For consideration:
- Size uniformity (<10% have nominal diameter of 5 mm)
- Homogeneous species
- Moisture content of beans (9-12%)
- Absence of musty, moldy, and other foreign odor and taste
- Absence of insects and other foreign matters
Grading of green coffee beans shall be based on the percentage of defects contained in
a 300-gram sample. Defects to be identified include black bean, infested bean, broken bean,
immature bean, husk bean, husk fragment, fermented/sour bean, admixture, and foreign
matter.

Total defects of 300-g sample % by mass, max

Grade Arabica Robusta Liberica Excelsa
1 7 8 10 10
2 15 15 15 15
3 20 17 25 25

Durian
For consideration:
- Maturity, freshness, firmness, cleanliness, wholeness
- Absence of mechanical damage
- Absence of insect pests and diseases
Premium Grade
Durian fruits in this grade shall be of superior quality and have the characteristic of the
variety or commercial type. They shall be matured, well-trimmed, well-formed, free from
defects associated with insects and microorganisms, and external physiological disorder with
exception of very slight superficial defects provided that these do not affect the general
appearance of the produce, the keeping quality and presentation in the package. The weight of
durian fruit shall not be less than 1.5 kg and not more than 4.0 kg.

Grade I

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 Durian in this grade shall be of good quality and has the characteristic of the variety or
commercial type. Durian fruits shall be matured, reasonably clean, well-trimmed, well-formed
and free from defects associated with insects, microorganisms and external physiological
disorders. Slight defects such as slightly misshapen and slight color are permissible provided
that they do not affect the general appearance of the produce, its keeping quality and
presentation in the package. The weight of durian fruit shall not be less than 1.5 kg and not
more than 4.0 kg.

Grade II
Durian in this grade which do not qualify for inclusion in the higher grades but satisfy
the requirement of this grade. Durian shall be fairly well-matured, fairly clean, slightly
misshapen, and free from defects associated with microorganisms. Defects due to mechanical
damage such as broken spines shall be allowed. The weight of durian fruit shall not be less than
1.5 kg and not more than 4.0 kg.

Mango
For consideration:
- Color, form, texture
- Maturity, freshness, firmness, cleanliness, degree of trimming
- Absence of mechanical damage
- Absence of damages caused by insect pests and diseases
Extra class
Mangoes in this class shall be of superior quality and have the characteristic of the
variety. Fruits must be mature, clean, well-trimmed, well-formed, smooth and free from pre-
harvest defects and defects associated with insects, diseases and handling with the exception
of very slight superficial defects, provided that these defects do not affect the general
appearance of the produce, the keeping quality and presentation in the package.

Class I
Mangoes in this class shall be of good quality and have the characteristic of the variety.
Fruits must be mature, clean, well-trimmed, well-formed, smooth and free from pre-harvest
defects and defects associated with insects, diseases and handling with the exception of very
slight superficial defects, provided that these defects do not affect the general appearance of
the produce, the keeping quality and presentation in the package.

Class II
Mangoes in this class which do not qualify for inclusion in the higher classes but satisfy
the requirements of class II. Fruits shall be mature, fairly clean, well-trimmed, fairly well-
formed, smooth and free from diseases, insect, infestation and any damage that materially the
general appearance of the produce, the keeping quality and presentation in the package.

Mangosteen
For consideration:
- Color, form
- Maturity, freshness, firmness, cleanliness
- Absence of defects and damages caused by insect pests and diseases

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 Class I
Mangosteen in this class must be of superior quality, has the characteristics of the
commercial type, well-formed, free from defects such as gummosis, latex stain, sunscald, wind
scar, gamboges, insect sting, bruises and internal defect such as translucent disorder.

Class II
Mangosteen in this class must be of good, has the characteristics of the commercial
type, fairly well-formed, free from defects such as gummosis, latex stain, sunscald, wind scar,
gamboges, insect sting, bruises and internal defect such as translucent disorder. Defects such
as insect sing, wind scar and bruises are allowed provided these defects do not affect the
general appearance and eating quality of the fruit.

Papaya
For consideration:
- Color, form, texture
- Maturity, freshness, firmness, cleanliness, degree of trimming
- Absence of mechanical damages
- Absence of damages caused by insect pests and diseases
Extra class
Papaya fruits in this class must be of superior quality and consist of hermaphrodite
fruits of characteristics of the variety. Fruits must be mature, not overripe, well-trimmed, well-
formed, smooth and free from diseases, discoloration, external damage such as bruises, cuts,
punctures, catface, scars, discoloration and internal defects such as uneven color and texture
of the pulp.

Class I
Papaya fruits in this class must be of good quality and consist of hermaphrodite fruits
of characteristics of the variety, mature, not overripe, clean, well-trimmed, fairly well-trimmed,
fairly well-formed, fairly smooth, free from diseases, external damage such as bruises, cuts,
punctures, catface, discoloration, scars and internal defects such as uneven color and texture
of pulp. 10% of the fruits are allowed for slight discolorations.

Class II
Papaya fruits which do not qualify for inclusion in the higher classes but must meet the
minimum requirements:
⮚ Mature, fresh, firm and free from any visible foreign matters.
⮚ Free from mechanical damages and damages caused by insect pests and diseases.

Pineapple
For consideration:
- Interior color
- Maturity, freshness, firmness, cleanliness
- Absence of mechanical damage
- Absence of insect pests and diseases
Extra class

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

 Pineapple in this class shall be of superior quality. They shall be of similar varietal
characteristics; well-formed, well-developed eyes; practically free from decay, sunscald, injury
caused by disease, insects, animals, mechanical or other means. The butts shall be trimmed,
well-cured, free from damage caused by cracks. The tops shall be of characteristic color, single,
straight, well attached to the fruit and free from crown slips, knobs and discoloration. The
length of the tops shall not be more than 1 ½ times the length of the fruit.

Class I
Pineapples in this class shall be of good quality. They shall be of same varietal
characteristics, well-formed, well-developed eyes; reasonably free from decay, sunscald, injury
caused by disease, insects, animals, mechanical or other means. The butts shall be well-
trimmed, fairly well-cured and have not been badly cracked. The tops shall be of characteristic
color, single, reasonably straight, well attached to the fruit and shall not have more than 5
crown slips. The length of the tops shall not be more than twice the length of the fruit.

Class II
Pineapples in this class which do not qualify for inclusion in the higher classes but
satisfy the minimum requirements. They shall be of similar varietal characteristics, fairly well-
formed, fairly well-developed eyes; reasonably free from decay, sunscald, injury caused by
disease, insects, animals, mechanical or other means. The tops shall be of characteristic color,
well attached to the fruit, not completely curved and consist of not more than 2 fairly well-
developed stems and shall have any number of crown slips.

Pummelo
For consideration:
- Maturity, firmness, cleanliness
- Absence of mechanical damage
- Absence of insect pests and diseases
Extra class
Pummelos are of superior quality, consist of one variety, well formed, with smooth
texture, and free from damages caused by: scab, sooty mold, rind borer, mite and scale insect.
They shall be free from defects with the exception of very slight superficial defects, provided
that these do not affect the general appearance of the produce, the keeping quality and
presentation in the package.

Class I
Pummelos in this class are of good quality, consist of similar varietal characteristics,
well formed, with fairly smooth texture, free from damages caused by: rind borer, mite, and
scale insect, scab, mealy bug and free from melanose and in the case of damage caused by
sunscald, 10% of the surface area, in aggregate, shall be permitted.

Class II
Pummelos which do not qualify for inclusion in the higher classes but satisfy the
minimum requirements. Pummelos in this class have similar varietal characteristics, well-
formed, with smooth to slightly rough texture. The fruit shall be free from melanose and severe
damages caused by: scab, sooty mold, rind borer, mite and scale insect and in the case of
damage caused by sunscald, ten percent of the surface area, in aggregate, shall be permitted.

Outstanding High Value Crops Cluster

ANNEX 10. Urban and
Peri-Urban Agriculture
Garden
(Macrogarden)
(Microgarden)
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR THE BEST URBAN AND PERI-URBAN AGRICULTURE GARDEN

I. RATIONALE
The Philippine Agriculture sector, in the recent decade, has shown significant trends that
call for a major augmentation. According to the Philippine Statistics Authority, as cited by
the Philippine Institute of Development Studies (2021), the percentage share of the
agricultural sector to total employment in the country declined from 43% in 1995 to 24%
in 2021. Moreover, in terms of land area, the Philippines’ arable land at 12.44 million
hectares (2020) faces a decline, attributed to the growth of the rural population, and other
socio-cultural, economic, environmental, and policy-institutional factors. In 2012, the
average land was at 1.29 ha, which also faces threats in terms of productivity and size
through the years. Alongside these, the urban population continues to expand and advance,
affecting the cost and quality of life at a significant rate. Comparing the urban population
data from the 2015 Census of Population (POPCEN) and 2020 Census of Population and
Housing (CPH), from the Philippine Statistics Authority alone, it shows an increase of 7.2
million urban dwellers recorded in the country.

On the other hand, during the surge of the COVID-19 Pandemic, people, especially in the
urban areas, were compelled to involve themselves in farming in their homes, as an
adaptive measure to their physical, mental, and socio-ecological needs. At an observable
rate, households elevated this interest into a more purpose-driven and long-term solution
to suffice their basic needs, which range from food, and a sense of community, to self-
actualization.

Despite these developments, it is acknowledged that urban and peri-urban agriculture

remains in its early stages as an industry, considering its developments in indoor farming,
smart farming, and the Fourth Industrial Revolution in Agriculture. Since the creation of the
National Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture Program (NUPAP) through the DA
Administrative Order No. 03, Series of 2022, there remains a clamor for increasing public
engagement, investments, and benefits of utilizing urban and peri-urban agriculture for the
national interest. The NUPAP has provided 43,290 kg of seeds, 3,284,829 seedlings,
345,020.6 kg/liters/bottles of soil ameliorants and fertilizers, and 186,685 pieces of
agricultural equipment and machinery. In addition, the Program strategically supplied 872
heads of rabbits, goats, and poultry, and established 8,362 partnerships, conducted 1,788
trainings, and set up 7,792 urban agriculture sites. Despite these accomplishments, the need
to implement support systems and create enabling environments is continuously being
addressed and strengthened.

One of which is through the provision of incentives to stakeholders with outstanding

performance, with potential for upscaling, replication, and inspiration to would-be food
producers in the urban and peri-urban areas. Through this search, it is reiterated that the
Philippine Government extends its support to the genuine development of the urban and
peri-urban agriculture industry.

Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Garden

 II. DEFINITION OF TERMS

a. Beneficiaries refer to the selected individuals or groups of individuals living in an urban

or peri-urban area who are recipients of projects and interventions of the government.

b. Garden is defined as a food production system (crops and livestock included) in urban
and peri-urban areas managed by a duly recognized and organized group in the
community, regardless of the sector (e.g. schools, LGUs (Local Government Units),
homeowners’ associations, Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) and other Civil
Society Organizations (CSOs), cooperatives, farmers’ associations, religious groups, etc.).
Urban agriculture-based Learning Sites for Agriculture (LSA) are also included.

c. Partners refer to individuals or groups that have collaborated with the NUPAP–
Program Management Office (PMO) and its program implementers, to complement the
implementation of the NUPAP program and activities such as the distribution of
agricultural inputs and establishment of production sites to their respective areas of
jurisdiction, facilitation of market linkage, monitoring and evaluation, and information
dissemination

d. Urban areas according to Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) Board Resolution No. 1,
series of 2017-098, refer to all areas in the National Capital Region (NCR) and all other
areas falling under any of the three categories:
o Category 1- Barangays with a population size of 5,000 or more, or;
o Category 2 - Barangays with at least one establishment with a minimum of 100
employees, or;
o Category 3 - Barangays with five or more establishments with 10 to 99 employees,
and five or more facilities within the two-kilometer radius from the barangay hall.

e. Peri-urban areas according to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization (UNESCO) refer to zones of transition from rural to urban land uses located
between the outer limits of urban and regional centers and the rural environment. A
barangay can be classified as peri-urban if this barangay is adjacent to urban area(s) and
if any of the following criteria are met:
o Population density in the barangay is at least 300 inhabitants per square
kilometer or 300 inhabitants per 100 hectares; or
o Poverty incidence in the barangay is 50% or lower

III. THE SEARCH FOR THE BEST URBAN AND PERI-URBAN AGRICULTURE GARDEN

A. Project Description

In an effort to maintain food production at home and in the community, the National
Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Program (NUPAP) and the Agricultural Training
Institute (ATI) are currently in the second year of their initiative, "The Search for the Best
Urban and Peri-Urban Gardens." It draws attention to the importance of food security in
rural areas, which is regarded as the primary barrier to achieving and sustaining a healthy
diet for people of all ages. In order to support the government's Sustainable Development
Goals for Health, Nutrition, and Food Security, it promotes sustainable vegetable
gardening and High-Value Commercial Crops (HVCC) projects in the community, at home,
and in schools. Nutritional balance can be achieved through a sufficient source of food

Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Garden

 supply, especially from backyard gardens, rooftop gardens, and indoor cultivation
systems.

B. Objective

This search aims to recognize the exemplary management and achievements of the
community-based urban and peri-urban agriculture gardens.

It aims to strengthen the partnership of the DA and the urban and peri-urban agriculture
stakeholders in the production of safe and quality produce in the metropolitan cities and
their productive peripheries. It also identifies community champions who will inspire the
localities to grow and eat nutritious food using various agricultural technologies.

C. Scope

The search is open to all established and organized urban and peri-urban agriculture
gardens (urban and peri-urban garden), in the Philippines as defined in this guideline. The
search for the best urban and peri-urban gardens will be divided into two major
categories: Category A Microgardens Cluster which has a land area of 250 sqm or less
and Category B Macrogardens Cluster which has a land area greater than 250 sqm.

IV. COMPETITION GUIDELINES

A. Eligibility

The interested urban and peri-urban garden must be duly registered and valid during
the evaluation period, from any of the following, but not limited to: Cooperative
Development Authority (CDA), Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE),
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), DA Accredited CSO, and ATI LSA
Certification for LSAs. In the case of school-based urban and peri-urban gardens,
certification from their Gulayan sa Paaralan Program (GPP) Coordinators in their
respective Schools Division Office can be considered as well as any certification and
accreditation from their respective LGUs.

B. Application Requirements

Requirements are categorized into technical and administrative requirements, to wit:

a. Technical Requirements

Each urban and peri-urban garden shall showcase either of the following, but not
limited to, urban and peri-urban agriculture technologies in their garden within the
duration of the search:

1. Soil-based urban and peri-urban gardening

● Conventional urban gardening
● Container gardening
● Vertical farming
● Rooftop gardening
● Raised beds
● Edible Landscaping

Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Garden

 ● Screen house and greenhouse farming
● Urban floriculture (edible and ornamental)
2. Soilless urban agriculture
● Hydroponics
● Aeroponics
● Urban aquaponics
○ Nile (grayish-black) and red tilapia farming
○ Catfish farming
○ Carp
○ Koi
○ Crab
○ Various ornamental fish

3. Smart farming technologies

● Indoor cultivation
● Greenhouse automation
● Internet of Things (IoT)
● Smart Sensors
● Drone Technology
● Smart fertigation
● Drip Irrigation system
● Other smart farming technologies

4. Mushroom Spawning and Production

● Shiitake mushroom
● Oyster mushroom
● Milky mushroom
● White button mushroom
● Volvariella mushroom
● Other edible mushroom species

5. Urban livestock production technology

● Rabbit farming
● Chicken, Quail, duck, and other poultry farming
● Urban apiculture (e.g. stingless bee production)
● Other livestock production technologies permitted by their
respective Local Government Unit (LGU)

6. Resource generation for urban agriculture

● Urban and peri-urban farm nursery
● Vegetable seed production
● Feed formulation
● Organically produced/natural soil ameliorants, biofertilizers, and
concoctions, including vermiculture and vermicomposting

b. Administrative Requirements

On the other hand, applicants must also submit the following administrative
requirements:

Regional Search

Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Garden

 1. Letter of Intent by the urban and peri-urban garden, noted by their head or
authorized representative.
2. Endorsement letter from any of the PA/MA/MAO/CA/CAO, or equivalent
3. The record book to be submitted must be softbound and shall contain the
following:

● Profile - Name of the urban and peri-urban garden, its brief description,
focal person, and contact details.
● Production data - list of crops grown and volume of harvest (in kilograms)
from January-December 2023, and area planted (in sq.m.) attested by the
PA/CA/MA, or CAO/MAO, or equivalent.
● Cost of Production - provide receipts or other equivalent proof or record
of transaction
● Sales record - provide sales entries/logs or receipts, if available
● List of beneficiaries and the form of assistance provided, if any
● Inventory of agricultural inputs, including but not limited to nutrient
solutions, fertilizers, and pesticides
● Urban and peri-urban agriculture technologies (as specified in the
technical requirements)
● Urban and peri-urban garden 4-Year Strategic Plan (Annex A) covering the
evaluation period (2023-2026), duly signed by their head or authorized
representative, and attested by their PA/CA/MA, or CAO, or equivalent.
● Visitors log, indicating the total number of visitors from January 2023 to
December 2023.
● Training certificates of officers and members, relevant to agriculture and
its allied sciences.
● Photo documentation to support the aforementioned items.

National Search

On top of the submission of the requirements required from the Regional Search,
regional nominee for national evaluation shall submit an Audio-visual presentation
(3 to 5 minutes long), showcasing the urban and peri-urban farms/gardens managed.
The following details shall be included in the material:
● Urban and peri-urban agriculture technologies used, practices, and
activities
● Production area, storage area, and waste management
● Impacts of their urban and peri-urban garden
● Sustainability Plan of their urban and peri-urban garden

1. Regional Nomination Process

a. During the regional search, the RSC shall use the scorecard on the evaluation
of the nominated urban and peri-urban garden (Annex B), to determine the
top-performing urban and peri-urban garden at the regional level. Then, the
RSC shall use a different scorecard to determine the best implementer of the
different urban and peri-urban agriculture technologies (Annex C).
b. Upon scoring, the RSC shall shortlist up to five (5) garden sites per category,
upon validation.
c. Upon validation, the RSC shall convene and finalize the results. The results will
then be endorsed to the DA-RED, for approval.
d. Record books endorsed by the DA-RED shall be submitted to the NEC through
the NTC for evaluation. The deadline for the submission of record books shall
be strictly enforced.

Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Garden

ANNEXES

Annex A. Strategic Plan Template

Annex B. NUPAP Search for Best Urban and Peri-urban Garden Scorecard
Annex C. NUPAP Search for Best Urban and Peri-urban Garden Best Implementer of
Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture Technology Scorecard

Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Garden

Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Agriculture Garden
Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Garden
Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Garden
Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Garden
Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Garden
Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Garden
Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Garden
Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Garden
Outstanding Urban and Peri-Urban Garden
ANNEX 11. Small Animal
Raiser Adopting Integrated
Farming System
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR SMALL ANIMAL RAISER ADOPTING
INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEM

I. RATIONALE

Livestock production plays a crucial role in the growth of the Philippine economy, and is
essential for achieving national food security. Farmers who integrate livestock farming
with grains and high-value crop production demonstrate that farming can be a
sustainable enterprise.

To promote and highlight agriculture as a competitive economic activity, the Department

of Agriculture has launched the search for Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting
Integrated Farming System. This initiative serves as a vital proof that livestock in
combination with crops is a profitable venture, benefiting not only the farmer but the
Filipino people as well as increasing the food supply.

II. OBJECTIVES

a. To provide incentive to small animal raisers who integrate livestock production with
other agriculture activities.
b. To give due recognition to small animal raisers for engaging in an integrated farming
system, contributing to economic upliftment, community welfare, and the attainment
of food security.
c. To encourage small animal raisers to adopt integrated farming systems to ensure
adequate nutrition.

III. SCOPE

The search awards a farmer who adopts an integrated farming system, with the main
activity and income derived from small animal enterprises such as swine, poultry, small
ruminants and rabbits.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

Nominees for the Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System
must meet possess the following qualifications:
a. A Filipino citizen of good moral character as certified by the Barangay Chairman;
b. At least 21 years old;
c. A farmer by principal occupation, practicing integrated farming system in a
contiguous area of not less than 0.5 hectare but not more than five (5) hectares, with
or without land ownership (rent/lease/usufruct/tenant), and with an animal
inventory of not less than ten (10) animal unit but not more than fifty (50) animal unit
at the time of official entry;
Large animals are not included in the computation of the animal vis-à-vis qualification of
nominee (See Table 1 for calculation of total animal units);
d. Must not be an employee/official of the Department of Agriculture;
e. Must have complete records or documentation of farm operations expenses and
income for the two (2) years immediately preceding the evaluation period;
f. Have a good credit standing, if a loan borrower; and
g. Must be an active member of any farmer association/organization for a minimum of
one (1) year:

Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 Table 1. Animal Unit by Species/Type
Species Animal Unit (a.u.)
Small Ruminants
Adult (Goat/Sheep) 0.20
Kids/Lambs 0.10
Swine
Breeders 0.50
Fatteners 0.30
Weanlings 0.15
Sucklings 0.10
Poultry
Chicken, Ducks, Guinea fowl 0.01
Turkey (Breeder) 0.05
Geese 0.030
Quail 0.001
Ostrich (Breeder) 0.30
(Growers) 0.20
(Juvenile) 0.10
Rabbit 0.01

Note: To calculate the farm’s animal units, identify the animal species on the farm, along
with their numbers and ages. Multiply the number of animals of each species by their
corresponding animal units. The sum of all these products is the total animal units.

Example:
2 goats (adult) : 2 x 0.20= 0.40
1 sow : 1 x 0.50 = 0.50
2 chickens : 2 x 0.01 = 0.02
total animal units = 0.92

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

Scrapbook. The nominee’s scrapbook shall be prepared by the nominee, with guidance
from the Agricultural Technologists (AT) of the locality, who will verify and check the
correctness and completeness of the book. The content of the scrapbook should be
consistent with all forms of farm records, supporting documents, and farmer’s answers
during the field validation.

The scrapbook must include the following content and follow this format:

a. Table of contents.
b. Nomination form duly filled out by the nominating officer, who must not be an
employee/official of the Department of Agriculture (see Form 1).
c. Brief story about the nominee (with two (2) recent ID pictures).
d. Farm location map. Sketch the farm’s location, indicating roads and important
landmarks or a google map picture with coordinates.
e. Farm lay-out. Sketch the land allocation for the different enterprises on the farm,
indicating their respective areas. Properly label each division properly with the
enterprise.
f. Production pattern diagram. Graph all the production patterns used on the farm
throughout the year, including breeding and calving times. For example, graph
cropping patterns and their procedures.

Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 g. Farm report. Farm records are important for the preparation of the farm report. Farm
record-keeping should be done at least one crop year, but preferably two (2) years,
immediately preceding the nomination. The prescribed forms should be used for farm
record-keeping on keeping farm records. The ATI assigned in the locality should guide
the prospective nominee in completing the farm records.

The farm report in the scrapbook consists of the following farm records:

1. Management practices and operation of the farm. Based on the data from farm
operations, summarized into major activities (e.g. land preparation, planting, feeding
practices, health management, etc.)

Use a separate form for each enterprise in the farm. Entries should be made for
every field operation.
i. Date of operation. Enter the month and day when the operation/activity was
done. It is possible to have two or more operations in one day.
ii. Material type. Includes the name of the material used and its formulation.
iii. Quantity. This refers to the amount of the materials used or applied.
iv. Labor hours. This is the number of hours spent for each operation in the
farm.
v. Power source and Hours used. Power source may be that of a draft animal or
a mechanical source. For in any operation using either animal or mechanical
means, record properly the number of hours used accurately.
vi.Cost per man-day, man-animal-day or man-machine-day. Record the prevailing
rate per day

2. Production record. The production record should reflect in the actual production of the
different enterprises in the farm. This should be recorded after each very harvest (for
crops) or at every animal disposal or at the end of the crop year (for livestock).

3. Cost and return analysis. Calculate the cost and returns for each by enterprise and for
the whole farm. The following is the procedure for analyzing the cost and return.

Labor and Power Costs. The amount of labor and power spent in each operation for each
enterprise should be expressed in man- days (MD), man-animal-days (MAD) or man-
machine-days (MMD). Calculate the total labor/power costs for each enterprise and then for
the entire farm. This is as calculated as:

Total Labor and Power Cost = (Total Labor: MD x Wage rate) +

(Total Power: MD/MAD/MMD Rate

Material input cost. The total cost of all materials used in the farm (e.g. seeds, fertilizers,
pesticides, etc.) This is calculated as:

Total Material Cost = (Quantity Material 1 x Price of Material1) + . .. +

(𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑀𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑁 𝑥 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑀𝑎𝑡𝑒)

Determine the Gross Return. The type of products, amount of production, and price of the
product are important components in calculating the return. Calculate the gross return
using the formula:

Gross Return = (Volume of Product 1x Price of Product 1) + … +

(Volume of Product N x Price of Prod)

Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 Determine the Net Return. This is computed as:

𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛 = 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛 − 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟 + 𝑀𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠

Calculate the Return over Investment (ROI). This is a measure of the return for every
monetary unit invested in the farm. The higher the ROI, the better is the economic
performance of the enterprise. This is calculated as:

𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒
𝑅𝑂𝐼 = 𝑥 100
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡

a. Farm photographs. Photographs should show the actual state of each enterprise
on the farm during the record-keeping period. Different activities for each
enterprise (e.g. planting, spraying, etc.) may also be included. Activities that need
special attention should be highlighted.
b. Business registration (if any).
c. Other supporting documents, including:
1. Certification from the Barangay that the nominee is a resident of the locality,
a Filipino citizen, a non-DA employee, and of good moral character.
2. Certification from the ATI that the nominee is a bona fide farmer, actively
farming a specified contiguous area.
3. Certification from a financing institution that the farmer has a good credit
standing (optional).
4. Photocopies of all documents and materials, including meritorious
contributions and accomplishments in their field of endeavor (e.g. certificate
of membership in farmers’ organizations, community involvement to certain
projects, etc.)
5. Income Tax Return (ITR) for the preceding two (2) years, certified by the
Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR).
6. Five-minute video presentation (maximum) of the farmer’s farm, animals,
activities and other related information.

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The following are the criteria under each area of evaluation:

A. The Farmer (25 points)

1. The Management Skills. This is the ability of the farmer’s ability to allocate resources
(land, labor, capital) to the different enterprises on their farm to optimize efficiency and
effectiveness of farm resources, increase resource complementation, and subsequently
increase farm productivity. Importantly, it encompasses the farmer’s ability to overcome
resource constraints and manage farm opportunities and potentials to transform them
into socio-economic benefits. It also includes farm resource management as the measure
of how available farm resources are utilized to optimize efficiency and effectiveness.

a. Farm Resources Management. This measures how well available farm resources
are utilized to optimize efficiency and effectiveness (10 points)

i. Land Resources Utilization. An important measure of land utilization is

cropping intensity, computed as total production during the year. A higher
index indicates a more intensified farm.

Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 ii. Farm Labor Optimization. Good labor management involves overcoming
labor constraints and maximizing labor opportunities/potentials to achieve
productive benefits.
b. Technical Knowledge. This refers to the farmer’s level of knowledge of
technologies that increases production and income, as well as their ability to
overcome technical constraints and manage technical opportunities/potentials for
the improvement of the farming system. (8 points)

c. Innovativeness. This refers to the farmer’s creativity, resourcefulness, and ability

to use indigenous or local resources in making improvements on the technical, social
and economic aspect of the farm. (7 points)

B. The Farm (20 points)

Farm Condition. This is an assessment of the general condition of the farm as

influenced by the farmer’s farming practices.

1. Farm Layout. This is an assessment of how effectively the farm has been planned,
designed and organized to facilitate systematic flow of production, marketing and
biosecurity.
2. Animal condition. The assessment of the overall condition of the animals, including
their physical and health status.
3. Health and Disease Prevention. This is an assessment of the soundness of the
farming system in relation to human and animal health, including preventive
measures and vaccination program
4. Waste Management and Utilization. This is an assessment of how the farm wastes
are properly managed, reused or recycled, to prevent pollution of the environment,
hazard to human and animal health, and food safety concerns.

C. The Farming System (45 points)

1. Degree of Integration. This is a measure of the extent of forward and backward

integration of small animals on the farm. Forward integration includes enterprises
derived from small animals (e.g. meat, milk, egg, etc.). while backward integration
includes other income-generating enterprises such as crops, fisheries or livestock
that contribute to small animal production (5 points).
The degree of integration between livestock and crops also plays a significant role
in biodiversity and environmental sustainability.
2. Application of Technology. This is an assessment of the suitability, adaptability
and effectiveness of the technology used on the farm. (5 points)
3. Sustainability. The evaluation of small animal farming in relation to ecological
conservation, production performance/stability and income consistency over the
years. (5 points)
4. Efficiency. This is a measure of output relative to the input used on the farm. This
includes the following:
a. Productivity. The measure of production based on standard animal parameters,
(e.g. Average Daily Gain (ADG), egg production, Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR),
average litter size, percentage livability, etc.). (5 points)
b. Profitability. The measure of the ROI. (5 points)
5. Replicability. The ability of the farming system to be repeated and duplicated by
other livestock farmers in the community. (5 points)

Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 6. Animal Welfare. Implementation of humane handling of animals in accordance
with the provisions in R.A. 8485 (Animal Welfare Act). (5 points)
7. Farm Record Keeping. Effective documentation of actual activities on the farm,
including operation, inputs, inventory, and production records, which can serve as
a reference for farm performance evaluation. (10 points)

D. The Contribution of the Community (10 points)

The assessment of farmer’s involvement in the community as a change agent,

particularly in sharing livestock technologies with others.
1. Membership in farmer’s organizations. (5 points)
2. Act as resource person/trainer for other farmers and involvement in
community livelihood development. (5 points)

Additionally, it measures the impact of the farming system on the community,

particularly in relation to the good animal husbandry practices employed on the farm.

Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING SMALL ANIMAL RAISER ADOPTING INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEM

Name/Institution :
________________________________________________________________________________________
Address : ________________________________________________________________________________________
Province/Region : ________________________________________________________________________________________

Justification for Nomination: _____________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nominated by : ___________________________________________________________________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name

Position : ___________________________________________________________________________________________

Address : ___________________________________________________________________________________________

Assisting Technician : _____________________________________________________________________________________

Signature Over Printed Name

Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

OUTSTANDING SMALL ANIMAL RAISER ADOPTING

INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEM
Recent 2x2 Picture

1. Name :
(Surname) (First Name) (Middle Initial)

2. Address :
(Barangay) (Town) (Province)

3. Citizenship: Sex: Civil Status:

4. Date of Birth: Place of Birth:

5. Educational Attainment:
6. Name of Spouse (If Married):
7. Number of Dependent:

Name Relationship Age Education

(if more than three (3) dependents, write in separate pages)

8. Type of Project (Cattle, Carabao, Pigs, Goats, etc.)

9. Location of the Project/s:

10. Species of Livestock raised:

11. Attached records of your production operation, production expenses and income for all
farm enterprises (i.e. vegetables, fruits, etc.) (Please attached necessary documents)

Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

12. Describe briefly your livestock production operation and improvement or introduces (if any)

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

13. Other sources of income including household members.

Source Estimated income per year

14. Person who are employed in your project

Activities No. of No. of Days Relationship

performed Laborers

15. Assets acquired during the last two (2) years including housing improvements, appliances and
capital outlays for the other investment. (Submit copy of Income Tax Return for the last two (2)
years, duly certified by the BIR).

Item Amount

Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

16. Describe your management practices (livestock production and management, etc)

Submitted by:

__________________________________________
Signature over Printed Name

Certified Correct:

___________________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name
(MA/AT)

Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

OUTSTANDING SMALL ANIMAL RAISER ADOPTING INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEM

PARTICULAR Maximum Points Score

I. The FARMER 25

a. Management Skills

1. Farm Resource Management 10

2. Technical Knowledge 8

7
3. Innovativeness
II. The FARM 20

a. Farm Condition

1. Farm Layout 5

2. Animal Condition 5

3. Health and Disease Prevention 5

4. Waste Management and Utilization 5

III. The FARMING SYSTEM

45
a. Degree of Integration 5

b. Application of Technology 5

c. Sustainability 5

d. Efficiency

1. Productivity 5

2. Profitability 5

e. Replicability 5

f. Animal Welfare 5

g. Farm record Keeping 10

IV. CONTRIBUTION TO COMMUNITY 10

a. Membership to farmer's organization 5

b. Acted as resource person/trainer 5

TOTAL 100

Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

ANNEX 12. Large Animal
Raiser Adopting Integrated
Farming System
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING LARGE ANIMAL RAISERS
ADOPTING INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEM

I. RATIONALE

Livestock production plays a crucial role in the growth of the Philippine economy, and is
essential for achieving national food security. Farmers who integrate livestock farming
with grains and high-value crop production demonstrate that farming can be a
sustainable enterprise.

To promote and highlight agriculture as a competitive economic activity, the Department

of Agriculture has launched the search for Outstanding Small Animal Raiser Adopting
Integrated Farming System. This initiative serves as a vital proof that livestock in
combination with crops is a profitable venture, benefiting not only the farmer but the
Filipino people as well as increasing the food supply.

II. OBJECTIVES

This aims to recognize the contributions of large animal raisers in attaining food security.

Specifically, this Search aims to:

a. To provide incentives to large animal raisers who integrate large animal production
with other agricultural activities.
b. To give due recognition to large animal raisers for engaging in integrated farming,
contributing to economic upliftment, community, and the attainment of food security.
c. To encourage individual large animal raisers to engage in integrated farming systems
to ensure adequate nutrition.

III. SCOPE
The search provides an award to farmers adopting integrated farming systems whose
main activity and income are derived from Large Animal enterprises such as beef cattle
and carabeef.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

Nominees for the Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting an Integrated Farming System
must possess the following qualifications:

a. A Filipino citizen of good moral character as certified by the Barangay Chairman;

b. At least 21 years of age;
c. A farmer by principal occupation, practicing an integrated farming system in a
contiguous area of not less than one (1) hectare, and maximum of five (5) hectares,
with or without land ownership (rent/lease/usufruct/tenant), and with animal
inventory of not more than thirty (30) animal units at any given time.
d. If there are small animals, it must not be more than 50% of the large animal unit. (see
Table 1 for calculation of total animal units);
e. Must not be an employee/official of the Department of Agriculture (DA);

Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 f. Must have complete records or documentation of his farm operations expenses and
income for the 2 years immediately preceding the evaluation period;
g. Have a good credit standing, if a loan borrower; and certification from the concerned
bank (optional); and
h. Must be a member of any farmer association/organization.

SPECIES ANIMAL UNITS

Large Ruminants
Adult (cattle/carabao 3 yrs. old & above) 1.00
Young Bull/heifer or steer
(2-below 3 years) 0.75
(1-below 2 years) 0.50
Calves (below 1 year) 0.25
Note: To calculate the farm animal units, identify the animal species in the farm,
their number, and ages. Multiply the number of animals of each species by their
corresponding animal units. The sum of all of their products is the total animal units.

Animal Unit
5 Adult Cattles …… 5 x 1.00= 5.00
2 Calves …… 2 x 0.25= 0.50
1 Sow …… 1 x 0.50= 0.50
2 Chicken …… 2 x 0.01= 0.02
Farm Total Animal Units = 6.02

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

1. Scrapbook. The nominee’s scrapbook shall be prepared by the nominee, with

guidance from the Agricultural Technologists (AT) of the locality, who will verify and
check the correctness and completeness of the book. The content of the scrapbook
should be consistent with all forms of farm records, supporting documents, and
farmer’s answers during the field validation.

The book must have the following content and format:

a. Table of contents
b. Nomination form duly filled out by the nominating officer, who must not be an
employee/official of the Department of Agriculture. (See Form 1. Nomination
Form.)
c. Brief story about the nominee (with two (2) recent ID pictures).
d. Farm location map. Sketch the farm’s location, indicating roads and important
landmarks or a google map picture with coordinates.
e. Farm lay-out. Sketch the land allocation for the different enterprises on the farm,
indicating their respective areas. Properly label each division properly with the
enterprise.
f. Production pattern diagram. Graph all the production patterns used on the farm
throughout the year, including breeding and calving times. For example, graph
cropping patterns and their procedures.
g. Farm report. Farm records are important for the preparation of the farm report.
Farm record-keeping should be done at least one crop year, but preferably two
(2) years, immediately preceding the nomination. The prescribed forms should be

Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 used for farm record-keeping on keeping farm records. The AT assigned in the
locality should guide the prospective nominee in completing the farm records.

The farm report in the scrapbook consist of the following information:

A. Management practice and operation of the farm. Based on the data from farm
operations, summarized into major activities (e.g. land preparation, planting,
harvesting, deworming, etc.):

Use a separate form for each enterprise in the farm. Entries should be made
for every field operation.
i. Date of operation. Enter the month and day when the operation/activity
was done. It is possible to have two (2) or more operations in one day.
ii. Material Type. Includes the name of the material used and its
formulation
iii. Quantity. This refers to the amount of materials used or applied.
iv. Labor hours. This is the number of hours spent for each operation in the
farm.
v. Power source and Hours used. The power source may be that of the
draft animal or a mechanical source. For in any operation using either
animal or mechanical means, record properly the number of hours used
accurately.
vi. Cost per man-day, man-animal-day or man-machine-day. Record the
prevailing rate per day.

B. Production record. The production record should reflect the actual production
of the different enterprises on the farm. This should be recorded after every
harvest (for crops), sales, and animal disposal/sale at the end of the
production year (for livestock)

C. Cost and return analysis. Calculate the cost and returns for each by enterprise
and for the whole farm. The following is the procedure for analyzing the cost
and return.

Labor and Power Costs. The amount of labor and power spent in each operation for each
enterprise should be expressed in man-days (MD), man-animal-days (MAD) or man-
machine-days (MMD). Calculate the total labor/power costs for each enterprise and then
for the entire farm. This is as calculated as:

Total Labor and Power Cost = Total Labor (MD x wage rate) +
Total Power (MAD/MD/MMD) x rate)

Material Input Cost. The cost of all materials used in the farm (e.g. seeds, fertilizers,
pesticides, etc.). This is as calculated as:

Total Material Cost= Quantity Material 1 x Price of Material 1) +…+

(Quantity Material N x Price N)

Determine the Gross Return. The type of products, amount of production and price of
product are important components in calculating the return. Calculate the gross return
using the formula:

Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 Gross Return = (Volume of Product 1 x Price of Product 1) + … +
(Volume of Product N x Price of Product N)

Determine the Net Return. Calculate the net return for each enterprise and for the whole
farm. This is computed as:

𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛 = 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛 − 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟 + 𝑀𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠

Calculate the Return Over Investment (ROI). This is the measure of the return for every
monetary investment in the farm. The higher the ROI, the better the economic
performance of the enterprise. This is calculated as:

𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒
𝑅𝑂𝐼 = 𝑥 100
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡

h. Farm photographs. The farm photographs should show the actual stand of each
enterprise of the farm during the record-keeping period. Different activities for
each enterprise (e.g. planting, spraying, etc.) may also be included. Activities that
need special attention should be taken into focus.
i. Business Registration (if any).
j. Other supporting documents, including:
i. Certification from the Barangay that the nominee is a resident of the
locality, a Filipino citizen, a non-DA employee, and of good moral
character.
ii. Certification from the ATI that the nominee is a bona fide farmer, actively
farming a specified contiguous area.
iii. Certification from a financing institution that the farmer has a good credit
standing (optional).
iv. Photocopies of all documents and materials, including meritorious
contributions and accomplishments in their field of endeavor (e.g.
certificate of membership in farmers’ organizations, community
involvement to certain projects, etc.)
v. Income Tax Return (ITR) for the preceding two (2) years, certified by the
Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR).
vi. Five-minute video presentation (maximum) of the farmer’s farm, animals,
activities and other related information

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The following are the criteria for each area of evaluation.

A. The Farmer (25 points)

1. The Management Skills. This is the ability of the farmer to allocate resources (land,
labor, capital) to the different enterprises on their farm to optimize the efficiency
and effectiveness of farm resources, increase resource complementation, and
subsequently increase farm productivity. Importantly, it encompasses the farmer’s
ability to overcome resource constraints and manage farm opportunities and
potentials to transform them into socio-economic benefits. It also includes farm
resource management and how available farm resources are utilized to optimize
efficiency and effectiveness. (10 points)

Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 2. Technical Knowledge. This refers to the farmer’s knowledge of technologies that
increase production and income, and their ability to overcome technical constraints
and manage technical opportunities/potentials to improve the farming system. (8
points)

3. Innovativeness. This refers to the farmer’s creativity, resourcefulness, and ability to

use indigenous or local resources to make improvements on the technical, social,
and economic aspects of the farm. (7 points)

B. The Farm (30 points)

1. Farm Resources Management. This measures how well available farm resources are
utilized to optimize efficiency and effectiveness (20 points)
a. Land Resources Utilization. An important measure of land utilization is
cropping intensity, computed as total production during the year. A higher
index indicates a more intensified farm. (5 points)
b. Farm Labor Optimization. Good labor management involves overcoming labor
constraints and maximizing labor opportunities/potentials to achieve
productive benefits. (5 points)
c. Capital Allocation. This refers to how the farmer manages his cash capital and
how he/she overcomes capital constraints. (5 points)
d. Use of indigenous or local resources. This provides information on whether
resources from the farm and community are being utilized so that the use of
external inputs is minimized. (5 points)

2. Farm Condition. This is an assessment of the general condition of the farm as

influenced by the farmer’s farming practices. (10 points)

a. Land use allocation. This is how the farm is properly planned, designed, and
organized for the location of different farm enterprises, machinery and
equipment, and other farm structures. This facilitates a systematic flow of
production, marketing, and biosecurity. (4 points)
b. Animal Health Condition. The assessment of the health condition of the
animals on the farm will provide information on the capacity of the farmer to
control animal diseases. (4 points)
c. Health and Environmental Safety welfare. This is an assessment of the
soundness of the farming system in human and animal health. For example,
the application of too much pesticide may endanger the lives of the farmers
and animals. This also refers to the effort of the farmer to keep his farm free
from pollution, pest build-up, etc. (waste disposal and management). (2
points)

C. Farming System (30 points)

1. Degree of Integration. The measure of the extent of integration in the farm, i.e. the
number of enterprises integrated and the scale of integration. (5 points)

2. Application of Technology. This is an assessment of the sustainability or effectiveness

of technology used on the farm. This may be gleaned from crop and animal conditions
and performance. (5 points)

3. Sustainability. This is an assessment of the ability of the farming system to produce

high production through generations. With limited data, this is rather difficult to
measure but from informal interviews, the evaluators must be able to extract

Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 information about this based on the past experiences of the farmer. This includes the
following: (5 points)
a. Ecological Conservation. This refers to the farming practices/measures that will
help in maintaining the ecological balance (e.g. soil and water conservation).
b. Production and income stability. This is the ability of the farming system to
maintain a high production level and net income through the years.

4. Replicability. The ability of the farming system to be repeated and duplicated by other
livestock farmers in the community. (5 points)

5. Efficiency. This is a measure of output relative to the input used on the farm. This
includes the following: (10 points)
i. Productivity. This is the measure of output over input (5 points).
ii. Profitability. The measure of the ROI. (5 points)

D. The Contribution of the Community (10 points)

1. Farmer’s involvement with the community. Membership in a farmer's organization.

This is one way of determining a farmer’s involvement in the community. (5 points)
2. Impact of the farming system on the economic upliftment and common good of the
community. (5 points)

E. Other Sources of Income (5 points)

Other sources of income but not limited to grains, high-value crops, processed products
and others.

Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING LARGE ANIMAL RAISER ADOPTING INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEM

Name :
Address :

Province/Region :
Justification for :
Nomination

Nominated by :
Signature Over Printed Name

Position :
Address :

Assisting Technician :
Signature Over Printed Name

Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

OUTSTANDING SMALL ANIMAL RAISER Recent 2x2 picture

ADOPTING INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEM

1. Name :
(Surname) (First Name) (Middle Initial)

2. Address :
(Barangay) (Town) (Province)

3. Citizenship: Sex: Civil Status:

4. Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
5. Educational Attainment:
6. Name of Spouse (If Married):
7. Number of Dependent:

Name Relationship Age Education

8. Type of Project (Cattle, Carabao, Pigs, Goats, etc.)

9. Location of the Project/s:

10. Species of Livestock raised:

11. Attached records of your production operation, production expenses and income for all farm
enterprises (i.e. vegetables, fruits, etc.)
(Please attached necessary documents)

Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 12. Describe briefly your livestock production operation and improvement or introduces (if any)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

13. Other sources of income including household members.

Source Estimated income per year

14. Person who are employed in your project

Activities No. of No. of Days Relationship

performed Laborers

15. Assets acquired during the last two (2) years including housing improvements, appliances and
capital outlays for the other investment. (Submit copy of Income Tax Return for the last two (2)
years, duly certified by the BIR).

Item Amount

Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

16. Describe your management practices (livestock production and management, etc)

Submitted by:

__________________________________________
Signature over Printed Name

Certified Correct:

___________________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name
(MA/AT)

Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

 Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

NAME: MUNICIPALITY:

ADDRESS: REGION:

OUTSTANDING LARGE ANIMAL RAISER ADOPTING INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEM

CRITERIA MAXIMUM SCORE

POINTS
A. THE FARMER (25 points)
1. Management Skills 10
2. Technical Knowledge 8
3. Innovativeness 7
B. THE FARM (30 points)
1. Farm Resource Management (20 points)
a. Land Resource Utilization 5
b. Farm Labor Optimization 5
c. Capital Allocation 5
d. Use of Indigenous or Local Resources 5
2. Farm Condition (10 points)
a. Land Use Allocation 4
b. Animal Health Condition 4
c. Health and Environment Safety Welfare 2
C. FARMING SYSTEMS (30 points)
1. Degree of Integration 5
2. Application of Technology 5
3. Sustainability 5
4. Replicability 5
5. Efficiency 10
D. CONTRIBUTION TO THE COMMUNITY (10 points)
1. Farmer’s Community Involvement
2. Impact of farming system to the community
E. OTHER SOURCES OF INCOME (5 points) 5
TOTAL 100

Outstanding Large Animal Raiser Adopting Integrated Farming System

ANNEX 13. Dairy Carabao
Raisers (Smallhold, Family
Module, Semi-Commercial,
Commercial)
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING DAIRY CARABAO RAISERS

I. RATIONALE

Dairy carabao raising is not just an agricultural practice; it is a critical economic activity
that supports rural livelihoods, enhances local food security, and contributes significantly
to the growth of the dairy industry. In recognition of this vital role, the Department of
Agriculture - Philippine Carabao Center (DA-PCC) has been acknowledging and celebrating
the outstanding contributions of local dairy carabao farmers to economic development
through prestigious awards during the annual “National Carabao Conference.” Since its
inception in 2015, this event has served as a platform to honor these farmers, and it is
organized and facilitated by the DA-PCC.

Beginning in 2024, the recognition of these exemplary dairy carabao farmers will be
aligned with the “Gawad Saka Parangal sa mga Natatanging Magsasaka at Mangingisda,” in
collaboration with the Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Training Institute (DA-ATI).
The newly harmonized “Search for Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raiser” aims to celebrate
the proactive efforts of local farmers who are not only committed to their craft but also
pioneers in adopting innovative and practical farming solutions.

This award will be presented to farmers who successfully implement recommended

technologies, turning carabao dairying into a profitable and sustainable enterprise. Their
achievements will serve as models for other farming families, demonstrating that through
innovation and dedication, carabao dairying can be a key driver of rural development and
socioeconomic empowerment.

II. OBJECTIVES

This aims to inspire broader adoption of sustainable and innovative practices in dairy
carabao raising.

Specifically, this Search aims to:

1. honor farmers who have successfully developed carabao dairying into a profitable
enterprise, contributing to local economies and providing sustainable livelihoods for rural
families.
2. highlight the important role of technology adoption/adaptation in improving dairy
carabao enterprises; and
3. encourage other farmers and communities to replicate the success of outstanding dairy
carabao raisers by sharing best practices and success stories from awardees, fostering a
culture of excellence in agriculture.

III. SCOPE

The search is open to all Filipino farmers who are non-government employees, and are
currently raising and milking their dairy buffaloes.

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

Nominees for the outstanding dairy carabao raiser must possess all of the following
qualifications:

a. A Filipino citizen of good moral character as certified by the Barangay Chairman;

and is engaged in dairy carabao farming enterprise;
b. At least 18 years of age;
c. He/She must be registered to any of the following Registry System: a. Registry
System for Basic Sector in Agriculture (RSBSA); b. Farmers and Fisherfolk
Enterprise Development Information System (FFEDIS); or c. Intensified research-
based enterprise build-up (iREB)
d. Must not be an employee/official of the Department of Agriculture (DA); whether
from the national government or local government unit (LGU);
e. He/She must not be related by affinity or consanguinity with any current elected
official in the Local Government Units (LGUs), and heads of DA offices (Director
level and up) up to second degree (except in IP Communities);
f. Must have complete records or documentation of his/her farm operations
expenses and income for 3 years immediately preceding the evaluation period;
g. There should be no charges against him/her involving moral turpitude, pending in
any court in the Philippines;
h. Have a good credit standing, if a loan borrower; and certification from the
concerned bank (optional);
i. He/She must have animal records and other relevant documents related to the
enterprise;
j. He/She must have the following animal holding:
● For Smallhold Category, the farmer must have one (1) to five (5) cows in
the herd;
● For Family Module, the farmer must have six (6) to ten (10) cows in the
herd;
● For Semi-Commercial Category, the farmer must have eleven (11) to fifty
(50) cows in the herd;
● For Commercial Category, the farmer must have more than fifty (50) cows
in the herd.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

1. Scrapbook. The nominee’s scrapbook shall be prepared by the nominee himself/herself,

to be guided by the Agricultural Technologist (AT) or Artificial Insemination Technician
of the locality, who will verify and check for the correctness and completeness of the book.
The content of the scrapbook should be consistent with all forms of farm records,
supporting documents, and farmer’s answers during the field validation.

The book must have the following content and format:

a. Table of contents
b. Nomination form duly filled out by the nominating officer, who must not be an
employee/official of the Department of Agriculture. (See Form 1. Nomination Form.)
c. Brief story about the nominee (including two (2) latest ID pictures, Form 2.
Nominee Data Form)
d. Farm Location map. Sketch the location of the farm indicating roads and important
landmarks.

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 e. Farm layout. Sketch the land allocation in the farm (e.g. animal housing, forage
area) with their respective area. Label each subdivision properly with the
enterprise.
f. Business registration (RSBSA, FFEDIS, iREB Dashboard)
g. Farm photographs. The farm photographs should show the important areas of
the farm (e.g.. animal housing, milking parlor, forage area, feeds storage) and
different activities relevant to the enterprise (e.g. re/planting and harvesting of
improved grasses, cleaning of animal housing, conduct of artificial insemination,
milking of animals, etc.).

h. Other supporting documents which include the following:

● Certification from the Barangay Chairman that the farmer is a Filipino
citizen of good character.
● Certification from the AT that the nominee is a bona fide farmer farming a
specified contiguous area.
● Certification from a financing institution that the farmer has a good credit
standing. (optional)
● Photocopies of all documents and materials indicating meritorious
contributions and accomplishments, in the field of endeavor. (e.g.
certificate of membership to farmer organizations, community
involvement in certain projects, etc.)
● Five-minute video footage of the farm, animals, activities, and other
relevant information

2. Dairy Farm Enterprise Records. Farm records are important proof and tools for
efficient and successful farm management. Farm records preferably three (3) years
immediately preceding the nomination should be provided. The AT/AI Technician
assigned in the locality should guide the prospective nominee in accomplishing the farm
record.

The farm record should consist of the following:

a. Animal Management System. The record should show the important

production practices and innovations applied that led to the
improvement/development of the enterprise. Entries should be made for every
field operation. (e.g. breeding management, feeding management, animal health
management) for each activity, the information needed includes:
a.1 Individual animal record. Each animal present in the farm should have
records showing the registry ID number, date of birth, tag ID number, breed,
dam's registry/tag ID number, sire's registry/tag ID number, distinct
characteristics, acquisition cost (if applicable), date released (if applicable),
source/origin of the animal.
a.2 Animal health record. Each animal present in the farm should have records
showing the monthly inspection, specific observations (including the BCS), tests
performed, diagnosis/remarks, drugs/biologics administered, and the signature
of the assigned technician.
a.3 Animal breeding record. Each female carabao in the farm must have
breeding record which is essential to track and manage the reproductive
performance and history of individual carabaos. These records are critical for
ensuring optimal breeding efficiency, improving herd genetics, and maintaining
productivity. It must contain dates of each breeding attempt (natural mating or
artificial insemination), helping to track conception efforts and monitor
reproductive cycles, and the results of pregnancy diagnosis and/or ovarian
palpation.

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 b. Productivity and Profitability records. These records are vital for effective farm
management and decision-making, helping the farmers to optimize operations,
improve financial outcomes and ensure long-term sustainability of the enterprise.
b.1 Calving record. Each of the cows present in the farm must have calving record.
This record must be able to show the animal’s date of calving, sex of the calf produced,
ID/Tag No. of the Sire, and classification (natural mating or AI).
b.2 Milk production record. Each of the cows present in the farm must have milk
production record which shows the dates of milk production, volume of milk
production, distribution/market (e.g. fed to calves, sold to cooperative, sold to private
individuals),and income generated.
b.3 Record of income and expenses. Farm income and expenses must be
properly documented through the iREB dashboard or the income statement of the
nominated carabao raiser. It must also show the ROI of the dairy enterprise.

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The following are the criteria for each area of evaluation.

a. Animal Management System (30 points)

1. Feeding management system. A proper feeding management system focuses on

meeting the nutritional needs of the dairy herd by providing a balanced diet that includes
high-quality forages, energy-dense feeds, and essential supplements. This approach is key
to optimizing milk production, supporting reproductive health, and boosting overall farm
profitability. Effective feeding management is reflected in the animal's body condition
score (BCS), which should ideally range between 3 and 4.5. Maintaining this range ensures
that cows are neither underfed nor overfed, promoting both productive efficiency and
long-term health.
2. Animal Health Management is essential for ensuring the well-being of the herd,
maximizing milk yield, and maintaining farm profitability. It involves proactive measures
to prevent, diagnose, and treat diseases, while promoting overall health and productivity.
Key components include regular vaccination and deworming (every 6 months) and
disease monitoring and prevention to help ensure that calf and adult animal mortality will
not be over 10% and 5%, respectively.

Where:

● Number of Calves Died: The total number of calves that died during the specified period.
● Total Number of Calves Born: The total number of live calves born during the same
period.

Where:

● Number of Adult Females Died: The total number of adult female carabaos that died
during the specified period.

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 ● Total Number of Adult Females: The total number of adult female carabaos in the herd
at the beginning of the period.

3. Recording System is essential for managing and optimizing farm operations by

systematically tracking important data. Key components are the complete records about
individual animal, breeding record, detailed logs of vaccinations, deworming, disease
treatments, and general health assessments, daily milk production record for each
lactating animal, and financial records.

b. Productivity (30 points)

1. Milk Production. The amount of milk a dairy buffalo produces over a specific period,
often measured in liters or kilograms. The total volume should be computed based on the
daily milk production recorded by the dairy raiser.
2. Breeding efficiency refers to the effectiveness with which the herd reproduces,
measured through various reproductive performance indicators. It is a crucial aspect of
dairy management that directly impacts productivity, profitability, and genetic
improvement. Key components of breeding efficiency include:

2.1 Pregnancy Rate: The indicator of how many females become pregnant relative to the
number of females exposed to breeding.

Where:

● Number of Females Pregnant: The total number female carabaos that got
pregnant during the specified period.
● Number of Females Exposed to Breeding: The total number female carabaos
exposed to AI or bull service(s) during the specified period.

2.2 Calving Interval: The time between consecutive calvings, with shorter
intervals generally indicating higher efficiency. An optimal calving interval is
typically around 12 to 14 months. Shorter calving intervals indicate higher
reproductive efficiency.

2.3 Services per Conception: The lower the number of services required to
achieve conception, the higher the breeding efficiency.

3. Calves Produced. Calf production plays a critical role in the sustainability and
profitability of dairy farms. Calves are primarily raised to replace older cows in the
herd, ensuring continued milk production. Ideally, the number of calves that can
be produced by each female carabao during its productive years is 6 to 7.
Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers
 c. Family Participation (10 points) refers to the involvement of family members
in various aspects of dairy farm operations. This criterion assesses the family
members’ contribution to the daily tasks, decision-making, and long-term
sustainability of the farm. It includes roles such as animal care, milking, feed
management, financial planning, and overall farm management. A high level of
family participation indicates a strong commitment to the farm's success,
intergenerational transfer of knowledge, and collaborative work ethic.

d. Milk and Milk handling practices (20 points)

Milking chutes area and milking paraphernalia- The use of milking
chutes and stainless steel pails facilitates a streamlined and organized milking
process for cows, significantly reducing stress for the animals and minimizing the
risk of contamination. This approach not only enhances animal welfare but also
ensures higher milk quality and hygiene standards, contributing to a more
efficient and effective dairy operation.

Observed milking procedures- Proper milking typically involves the

stripping method and the use of iodine as key steps in ensuring udder health and
milk quality.

e. Business Performance (measured by calculating the return on investment

or ROI) (10 points)- evaluating the success and profitability of a business
through Return on Investment quantifies the efficiency of an investment by
comparing the profit generated relative to the capital invested. A higher ROI
indicates better performance, as it reflects the enterprise’s ability to generate
substantial returns from its resources. An ROI of 15% or better is the acceptable
level to help sustain dairy operations.

Where:

● Net Profit: This is calculated as the total revenue generated from the investment
minus the total costs associated with that investment.

Net Profit=Total Revenue−Total Costs

● Cost of Investment: This is the total amount invested in the project or asset.

For the Family Business, Semi-commercial and Commercial subcategories, the

following criteria will also be evaluated:

f. Surroundings. Sanitation and waste management in dairy production are critical

components for maintaining herd health, ensuring milk quality, and promoting
environmental sustainability. These practices involve the systematic handling of
waste and the implementation of hygiene measures throughout the dairy
operation.

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 Sanitation. Establishing strict hygiene protocols for milking equipment,
barn areas, and animal handling is essential to prevent the spread of diseases and
contamination of milk. Regular cleaning and sanitizing routines are crucial.
Waste management particularly effective manure management systems
and strategies to control odor associated with manure handling are essential for
reducing pollution and maintaining soil health. This may involve composting,
anaerobic digestion, or using manure as fertilizer in crop production.

g. Facilities. Components of this criteria include the following:

Adequate housing. The provision of a well-designed, comfortable, and
safe living environment is essential for promoting the health, welfare, and
productivity of dairy animals. A properly structured housing facility should offer
sufficient space and ensure adequate air circulation to maintain optimal
temperature and humidity levels, which helps reduce heat stress and respiratory
problems. Ideally, each adult carabao should have at least 8–10 square meters of
resting space in loose housing systems. This allows the animals to lie down
comfortably, rise with ease, and move around without disturbing one another.

h. Milk collection and delivery system is a vital process that ensures fresh, high-
quality milk is efficiently transported from the farm to processing facilities. This
system involves several key steps, from milking the cows to delivering the milk for
further processing or distribution.

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING DAIRY CARABAO RAISER

Subcategory: _______________________________

Name/Institution :
Address
:

Province/Region
:
Justification for :
Nomination

Nominated by :

Signature Over Printed Name

Position :
Address :

Assisting Technician :

Signature Over Printed Name

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

Recent 2x2 Picture

OUTSTANDING DAIRY CARABAO RAISER

1. Name :

________________________________________________________________________________________________
(Surname) (First Name) (Middle Initial)

2. Address:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
(Barangay) (Town) (Province)

3. Citizenship: _____________________ Sex :______________ Civil Status :___________________________

4. Date of Birth: _______________________Place of Birth: __________________________________________________
5. Educational Attainment: _____________________________________________________________________________
6. Name of Spouse (If Married): ________________________________________________________________________
7. Number of Dependent/s: ____________________________________________________________________________

Name Relationship Age Education

_________________________________ ___________________ ______ ____________________________
_________________________________ ___________________ ______ ____________________________
_________________________________ ___________________ ______ ____________________________
_________________________________ ___________________ ______ ____________________________

(if more than three (3) dependents, write in separate pages)

8. Location of Farm: ___________________________________________________________________________________

9. Breed of carabaos owned/raised:

__________________________________________________________________________________

10. Attached records of animal management, productivity and profitability of the dairy
enterprise (Please attach necessary documents.)

11. Describe briefly your carabao production operation and improvement or innovations (if
any).

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

12. Other sources of income including household members.

Source Estimated income per year

____________________________________________ _______________________________________________
____________________________________________ _______________________________________________
____________________________________________ ______________________________________________
____________________________________________ _______________________________________________

13. Persons who are employed in your farm

Activities No. of No. of Days Relationship

Performed Laborers
_______________________ _____________ ___________ _________________
_______________________ _____________ ___________ _________________
_______________________ _____________ ___________ _________________
_______________________ _____________ ___________ _________________

14. Assets acquired during the last three (3) years. ncluding housing improvements, appliances
and capital outlays for the other investment.

Item Amount

15. Describe your management practices

Submitted by:

__________________________________
Signature of Nominee

Certified Correct:

___________________________
AT/MA

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

SMALLHOLD CATEGORY
Criteria Weight%

1. Animal Management System 30

a. Feeding management system- based on the body score 10
conditions (BCS) of the animal not less than 3 and not more
than 4.5
91%-100% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not
more than 4.5: 10 points
81%-90% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not
more than 4.5: 8 points
71%-80% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not
more than 4.5: 6 points
61%-70% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not
more than 4.5: 5 points
51%-60% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not
more than 4.5: 4 points
50% and below of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but
not more than 4.5: 0 point

b. Animal Health Management

-regular vaccination & deworming- at least twice a 5
year/every 6 months
- acceptable mortality rate (not more than 5% for adult, 5
not more than 10% for calves)

c. Recording System - proper filling up and recording of the 10

events and activities in the individual animal record
-with complete and reliable individual animal record, milk
production record, calf production record, breeding record,
record of income and expenses

2. Productivity 30
a. Milk Production 10
- 4 and above liters per day per animal (on average)
collected for a period of 305 days. Ideally should be
1,220 liters for the entire lactation period of each
cow.
b. Breeding efficiency 10
- ideally, pregnancy rate must be at least 50%
- calving interval of not more than 14 months
- two services per conception
c. Calf Produced
- Ideally, there must be a production of 6 to 7 10
calves during the productive years of each
female carabaos (9 productive years from the
age of 18 months to 12 years)

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 3. Family Participation- involvement of family members 10
in dairying.
With only one member participation: 5 pts.
With more than one member participation: 10 pts.

4. Milk and Milk handling practices 20

a. Milking chutes area and milking paraphernalia
- use of stainless steel pail and clean milking chutes 10
b. Observed milking procedures
- cleaning of udder before milking, practice of 10
stripping and use of iodine

5. Business Performance (ROI) 10 10

- ROI of 15% or better: 10 pts
- ROI of 12%-14%: 8 pts
- ROI of 9%-11%: 7 pts
- ROI of 6%-8%: 5 pts
- ROI of 3%-5%: 3 pts
- ROI of 1%-2%: 1 pt
- ROI of 0% and below - 0 pt

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 FAMILY BUSINESS CATEGORY
Criteria Weight%

1. Compliance with PCC-recommended facilities/ technologies

a. Animal shed and forage area 5 5

2. Animal Management System 30

a. Feeding management system- based on the body score 10
conditions (BCS) of the animal not less than 3 and not more than
4.5
91%-100% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 10 points
81%-90% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 8 points
71%-80% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 6 points
61%-70% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 5 points
51%-60% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 4 points
50% and below of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not
more than 4.5: 0 point

b. Animal Health Management 10

- regular vaccination & deworming- at least twice a year/ every
6 months

c. Recording System - proper filling up and recording of the events 10

and activities
- with individual animal record, milk production record,
calf production record, breeding record, record of
income and expenses

3. Productivity
30
a. Milk Production 10
- 4 and above liters per day per animal (on average)
collected for a period of 305 days. Ideally should be
1,220 liters for the entire lactation period of each cow.
b. Breeding efficiency
- ideally, pregnancy rate must be at least 50% 10
- calving interval of not more than 14 months
- services per conception
c. Calf Produced
10
- Ideally, there must be a production of 6 to 7 calves
during the productive years of each female
carabaos (9 productive years from the age of 18
months to 12 years)

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

4. Family Participation- involvement of family members in dairying. 5 5
With only one member participation: 2 pts
With more than one member participation: 5 pts

5. Milking and Milk Handling Practices 10

a. Milking chutes area milking paraphernalia 5
- with clean stainless pail and can

b. Observed milking procedures 5

- stripping and use of iodine

6. Surroundings 5
a. Sanitation 3
b. Waste management 2

7. Milk collection and delivery system 5

- milk storage facility 1.5
- milk collection vehicle and schedule/time of collection 1.5
- milk quality testing procedures 2

8. Profitability (ROI) 10 10
- ROI of 15% or better: 10 pts
- ROI of 12%-14%: 8 pts
- ROI of 9%-11%: 7 pts
- ROI of 6%-8%: 5 pts
- ROI of 3%-5%: 3 pts
- ROI of 1%-2%: 1 pt
- ROI of 0% and below - 0 pt

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 SEMI-COMMERCIAL BUSINESS CATEGORY
Criteria Weight %

1, Herd Management System 30

a. Feeding management system-based on the body score condition 10
(BCS) of the animal not less than 3 and not more than 4.5.
Evaluate the overall herd physical condition.
91%-100% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 10 points
81%-90% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 8 points
71%-80% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 6 points
61%-70% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 5 points
51%-60% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 4 points
50% and below of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not
more than 4.5: 0 point

b. Animal Health Management 10

- regular vaccination and deworming- every 6 months

c. Recording system- proper filing up and recording of the events

and activities 10
- Complete records of individual animal, milk production,
calf production, health, and breeding record

2. Productivity 30
a. Milk Production 15
- 4 and above liters per day per animal (on average)
collected for a period of 305 days. Ideally, milk produced
should be 1,220 liters for the entire lactation period of
each cow.
b. Breeding efficiency 10
- ideally, pregnancy rate must be at least 50%
- calving interval of not more than 14 months
- services per conception
c. Calf Produced 10

- Ideally, there must be a production of 6 to 7 calves

during the productive years of each female carabaos
(9 productive years from the age of 18 months to 12
years)

3. Milking and Milk Handling Practices 10

a. Milking chutes area 3
b. Milking paraphernalia 3
- with clean stainless pail

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 c. Observed milking procedures 4
- Milk testing
- stripping and use of iodine

4. Surrounding 5
a. Sanitation 3
b. Waste management 2

5. Facilities 10
a. Adequate Housing 4
b. Forage area 4
c. Availability of the feeding trough and drinking water 2

6. Milk collection and delivery system 5

- milk storage facility: 1.5
- milk collection vehicle and schedule/time of collection: 1.5
- milk quality testing procedures: 2

7. Profitability (ROI) 10 10
- ROI of 15% or better: 10 pts
- ROI of 12%-14%: 8 pts
- ROI of 9%-11%: 7 pts
- ROI of 6%-8%: 5 pts
- ROI of 3%-5%: 3 pts
- ROI of 1%-2%: 1 pt
- ROI of 0% and below - 0 pt

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 COMMERCIAL BUSINESS CATEGORY
Criteria Weight %

1. Herd Management System 30

a. Feeding management system-based on the body score 10
condition (BCS) of the animal not less than 3 and not more
than 4.5. Evaluate the overall herd physical condition.
91%-100% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 10 points
81%-90% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 8 points
71%-80% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 6 points
61%-70% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 5 points
51%-60% of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not more
than 4.5: 4 points
50% and below of the herd have BCS of not less than 3 but not
more than 4.5: 0 point

b. Animal Health Management

- regular vaccination and deworming- at least every 6 10
months

c. Recording system- proper filing up and recording of the

events and activities 10
- Complete records of individual animal, milk production,
calf production, health, and breeding record

2. Productivity 30
a. Milk Production 15
- 4 and above liters per day per animal (on average)
collected for a period of 305 days. Ideally, milk produced
should be 1,220 liters for the entire lactation period of
each cow.
b. Breeding efficiency 10
- ideally, pregnancy rate must be at least 50%
- calving interval of not more than 14 months
- services per conception
c. Calf Produced
5
- Ideally, there must be a production of 6 to 7 calves
during the productive years of each female carabaos
(9 productive years from the age of 18 months to 12
years)

3. Milking and Milk Handling Practices 10

a. Milking chutes area 3
b. Milking paraphernalia 3

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

 - with clean stainless pail
c. Observed milking procedures 4
- stripping and use of iodine

4. Surrounding 5
a. Sanitation 3
b. Waste management 2

5. Facilities 10
a. Adequate Housing 4
b. Forage area 4
c. Availability of the feeding trough and drinking water 3

6. Milk collection and delivery system 5

- milk storage facility 1.5
- milk collection vehicle and schedule/time of collection 1.5
- milk quality testing procedures 2

7. Profitability (ROI) 10 10
- ROI of 15% or better: 10 pts
- ROI of 12%-14%: 8 pts
- ROI of 9%-11%: 7 pts
- ROI of 6%-8%: 5 pts
- ROI of 3%-5%: 3 pts
- ROI of 1%-2%: 1 pt
- ROI of 0% and below - 0 pt

All Forms and Annexes (if any) shall be attached after the Criteria for Evaluation which shall
include the Nomination Form, Nominee Data Form, Evaluation Score Form, among others.

The soft copy of the template can be downloaded at: https://tinyurl.com/2w4xzaha

Outstanding Dairy Carabao Raisers

ANNEX 14. Dairy Cattle and
Goat Raiser
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING DAIRY CATTLE AND GOAT RAISER

I. RATIONALE

The Gawad Saka Award, spearheaded by the Department of Agriculture, recognizes and
honors outstanding cooperatives in the agricultural sector. This award specifically
acknowledges cooperatives with exemplary performance in dairy cattle and goat farming,
particularly those that have achieved the highest milk yields. The Gawad Saka Award aims
to inspire and motivate others to strive for excellence, adopt best practices, and
contribute to the growth and sustainability of the dairy industry.

II. OBJECTIVES

1. To recognize and honor cooperatives with the highest milk yield in dairy cattle and
goats.
2. To promote best practices in dairy farming and encourage innovation and
sustainability.
3. To motivate cooperatives to improve their productivity and quality of milk
production.
4. To highlight the importance of cooperative efforts in strengthening the
agricultural sector.
5. To encourage the adoption of new technologies and practices that can enhance dairy
yield and quality.

III. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

1. The nominee must be a registered cooperative involved in dairy cattle or goat

farming.
2. The cooperative must have been operational for at least three years.
3. The cooperative must have a proven track record of high milk yield and quality
production.
4. The nominee should demonstrate adherence to sustainable and ethical farming
practices.
5. The cooperative must be in good standing, with no legal or financial issues
pending.
6. The nominee must have a strong community impact, contributing to local
development.

Outstanding Dairy Cattle and Goat Raiser

IV. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

1. Fully-accomplished nomination form.

2. Nominee is already enrolled/registered under the Dairy Monitoring System (DMS).
3. Submitted report of total milk production.
4. Technical working group (TWG) validation of average milk yield (2023- December
2024).
5. Number of dams, heifers, and calves.
6. Farm with the biggest herd size and milk production in the Philippines.
7. Photographs or videos documenting the cooperative’s facilities, processes, and
products.

V. EVALUATION CRITERIA

1. Milk Yield (50%)

o Total milk production over the past year.
o Consistency and quality of milk yield.
2. Sustainability Practices (20%)
o Adoption of environmentally friendly practices.
o Animal welfare and ethical farming standards.
o Efficient use of resources and waste management.
3. Innovation and Technology (20%)
o Implementation of innovative techniques or technology in dairy farming.
o Improvements in production efficiency and product quality.
4. Impact on Community (10%)
o Contribution to local employment and economic development.

Outstanding Dairy Cattle and Goat Raiser

ANNEX 15. Fisherfolk – Fish
Capture
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING FISHERFOLK FISH CAPTURE CATEGORY

I. RATIONALE

Capture fisheries significantly contribute to the country’s economy. This subsector

supplies an average of 2.4 mt of fish, with a value of 136.2B pesos annually in the last
decade (2006-2015). The municipal fisheries subsector which is also usually referred
to as sustenance or small-scale fishing forms 53% by volume and 55% by value of the
contribution from capture fisheries (Fisheries Profile, 2016). Likewise, current
municipal fisherfolk registration is about 1.8 M fisherfolk as of 2018 who are mainly
engaged in fishing and gathering of fish and other aquatic products

Recognizing the need to sustain the contribution of capture fisheries in providing

food, employment and incomes to fisherfolk, the Department of Agriculture (DA)
through the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources implements policies and
programs with the overall objective of sustainable fish production for food (fish)
security. In view of the important role of fisherfolk in attaining this objective, the
Department introduced the Search for Outstanding Fisherfolk to give recognition
to exemplary performance and achievements towards government efforts in
development and sustaining the fisheries. As a Outstanding Fisherfolk in Fish
Capture Award, which aims to document and showcase municipal and small scale
commercial fishing as a competitive enterprise in line with sustainable fisheries.
This category is distinct and separate from the Outstanding Fisherfolk – Fish Culture
Category.

II. OBJECTIVES

a. Give due recognition to municipal and small scale commercial fishers for their
exemplary performance and achievements in the field of capture fisheries;
b. Provide an incentive to municipal and small scale commercial fishers to enhance
their technologies, improve their productivity and income-generating activities,
and empower themselves to contribute to the welfare and socio-economic
upliftment of their communities;
c. Document success stories and provide role models that other sustenance and
small scale commercial fishers can emulate and,
d. Strengthen research and development in capture fisheries of the Department of
Agriculture by providing venue for further research and innovation made on
efficient but sustainable and environment friendly fishing technologies and
practices by experienced fishers that can be adopted by municipal and small scale
commercial fishers
e. Conduct the search for Outstanding Fisherfolk in Fish Capture as part of the
annual GAWAD SAKA Program of the Department of Agriculture;
f. Adopt a systematic process for the search and selection of outstanding nominee
engaged in fish capture; and
g. Engage the Awardee in disseminating their winning technologies, innovation,
performance and achievements.

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 III. SCOPE

The GAWAD SAKA for Outstanding Fisherfolk – Fish Capture Category is an annual
nationwide search for municipal and small-scale commercial nominee with
exemplary performance/achievements and qualification standards provided in these
guidelines

Nominee is defined as a person directly or personal and physical engaged in taking

fisher and/or aquatic resources as defined in the revised Philippine Fisheries Code
(RA 8550 as amended by RA 10654). Municipal fishing generally refers to fishing
within the municipal waters using bot of three (3) gross tons (G.T.) or less, or fishing
not requiring the use of fishing boats. Furthermore, small-scale commercial fishing
refers to fishing with passive or active gear utilizing fishing vessels of 3.1. gross tons
(G.T.) up to 20 gross tons (G.T.).

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

The nominee must possess the qualifications and comply with the requirements as
stated below:

a. Law-abiding Filipino citizen, taxpayer, of good moral character, and non-

Department of Agriculture personnel.
b. FishR registered municipal fisherfolk or BFAR – licensed small-scale commercial
fisherfolk prior to the nomination to the Municipal Search.
c. No record of violation of any fishery rules, regulations from the Municipal
Agriculture Office or BFAR Provincial Fishery Office.
d. Currently physically engaged in actual fishing activities for at least two (2) years
preceding the nomination
e. Uses environment friendly fishing gears and operations that are compliant to
existing rules and regulations.
f. Record of fishing operations such as fishing gears used, volume of catch, income,
operating expenses, investments and other relevant data for the last two years
preceding the evaluation.
g. Of good credit standing if loan burrower.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

The nominee’s Scrapbook shall include the following:

a. Table of Contents
b. Nomination Form duly accomplished by the nomination person, head of civic
organization or fisherfolk association (Form 1) and certified by the Municipal
Agriculturist or Agricultural Technologist (MA/AT) in case of municipal nominee or
the MA/A and BFAR Regional Office Authorized Representative in case of small-
scale commercial nominee.
c. Duly filled-up Personal Data Form with the latest 2 x 2 picture indicating among
others, history of the nominee’s fishing operation and other fishery-related
livelihoods, as certified by the MA/AT for municipal fisherfolk or the MA/AT and
BFAR Regional Office Authorized Representative in case of small scale commercial
fisherfolk (Form 2)

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 d. Brief biography or write-up on the nominee
e. Summary of Fishing Operations for the last 2 years including catch, fishing gears
used, species caught, selling prices, etc. (Form 4) and attested by the MA/AT.
f. Income and financial statements of fishing operations showing assets an
investments made for the last 2 years (Form 5a, Form 5b, Form 5c).
g. Financial Report of Fishing Operations for the last two years (sample shown in
(Form 5a)
h. Financial Report of Other Fishery-related Livelihoods/s for the last two years
(please prepare separate report for each fishery-related business) (sample show
in Form5b)
i. Financial Report of Non Fishery-related Alternative Livelihoods/s for the last two
years (please preapare separate statements for each non-fishery-related
livelihood) (sample shown Form c)
j. Certified copies of Boat Registration/License (BoatR and LGU Boat Registration for
Municipal; and Commercial Fishing Vessels and Gear Licenses for small-scale
fishing vessel).
k. Certificate or any available document that the nominee is FishR registered prior to
the nomination to the Municipal Search certified by BFAR Regional Office.
l. Certification from the Barangay Captain that the nominee is a resident of the
locality, law-abiding Filipino citizen, non-DA personnel, of good moral character.
m. Certification of good credit standing if nominee is a loan borrower or Statement of
no outstanding loan signed by the nominee and attested by the MA/AT.
n. Photocopies of Income Tax Returns and Official Receipts of Payment for the last
two years filed on or before the set deadline attested by the MA/AT. If exempted,
certification with proper documentary, from the local branch of the Bureau of
Internal Revenue, that nominee is exempted from filing income tax returns.
o. Photocopies of documents/materials indicating specific meritorious contributions
and accomplishments (i.e. certificates of
awards/recognition/appreciation/memberships, etc. (past and current)) attested
by the MA/AT. If exempted, certification with proper documentary stamp, from the
local branch of Bureau of Internal Revenue, that nominee is exempted from filing
income tax returns.
p. Photographs of actual fishing operations, handing practices, marketing activities,
investments, assets, other sources of income and other activities.
q. Photocopies of relevant Municipal Ordinances relating to the fishing operations of
the nominee as certified by the MA/AT.
r. Checklist of documents submitted (Form 6)

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The evaluation criteria shall be based on the entire character or personality of the
nominee. Using this concept, the nominee shall be evaluated according to the
following: 1) The Nominee; 2) Fishing Operation; 3) Fisheries conservation and
management; 4) Leadership and socio-economic; and 5) Non-fisheries related
source of income.

a. The Nominee
The nominee is the primary factor that is being evaluated. His/Her fishing
operation is the product of his/her knowledge, skills and other attributes.

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 1. Character

This refers to the nominee’s personality; his perceived relationships with his
family and community members; his ability to command respect from his
peers, superiors and subordinates; his bearing; and his manners. He must be a
model not only to his family but also to his community members.

The evaluator will interview three (3) of any of the following immediate
family members: Wife, Children, In-laws, Siblings, Parents

The nominee will be rated according to the scale below:

Perception Score
Outstanding 5
Very Satisfactory 4
Satisfactory 3
Unsatisfactory 0

The evaluator will interview six (6) of any of the following community
leaders: Mayor, A.T., Brgy. Capt., BFARMC, Church Leader, 2 Neighbors

The nominee will be rated according to the scale below:

Perception Score
Outstanding 5
Very Satisfactory 4
Satisfactory 3
Unsatisfactory 0

The final rate of the nominee for this criteria will be the average score from the
respondents.

2. Leadership/Membership to Organizations

This refers to the nominee’s recognized positions/ designations in an

association

3. Management Skills

This is the ability of the nominee to direct or carry on his/her business affairs;
the judicious use of all means to accomplish his/her goals. Given importance in
this sub-criterion are the factors such as resource utilization, labor practices,
resourcefulness and records keeping

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 i. Resilience and Innovativeness

The nominee’s ability to allocate resources such as manpower,

equipment, monetary and non-monetary assess to, the different
needs of operations to optimize efficiency and productivity. Also
concerns on the ability of the nominee to act effectively in
overcoming constraints in family and community affair, fishing
operation, livelihoods and other situations.

Questions to be raised to the nominee:

1. How do you manage/divide financial resources during hard times
(i.e. low catch, calamities, engine/boat/gear damage or breakdown,
etc.) (1 point)
2. Has the nominee introduced innovative ways to improve fishing (1
point)

ii. Labor Practice

This refers to the treatment of workers by the nominee; salary or

sharing systems and other labor practices.

b. Fishing Operations

1. Actual Fishing

1.) Sustainable Fishing Technologies and Methods

Evaluation of fishing technologies and methods that the nominee

employs. This refers to the appropriate fishing technology. The
nominee may not be necessarily an innovator but may have adopted
sustainable fishing technologies, use appropriate fishing gear and
practices that are not in contravention with relevant laws and
regulations. Please refer to Parts 1 and 2 of the Fishing Operations
Profile (Form 3).

2.) Safety of Life at Sea

Basic life saving devices and practice that are observed onboard. Also
includes monitoring and use of weather and calamity advisories/
information.

3.) Involvement in Actual Fishing

This involves the frequency of the nominee in actual fishing operation.

Please refer to columns c to e of Part 3 of the Fishing Operations Profile
(Form 3).

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 4.) Catch Rate, Quantity and Species Caught

This refers to the evaluation on the catch per unit effort (CPUE), total
production and the status of species caught. Please refer to the
columns h to k of Part 3 of the Fishing Operations Profile (Form 3).

2. Postharvest Practices

This refers to the fishing activities adopted by th nominee after hauling the catch
onboard the fishing boat, transporting the catch to unloading area and marks.

i. Fish Handling Onboard

This criterion rates the fish handling, cleanliness and sanitation,

storage and other fish preservation activities onboard. Please refer to
item 10 of the Personal Data Form (PDF), Form 2.

ii. Value Adding of Products

This rates the processing and value adding activities of fishery

products. Please refer to item 10 f the Personal Data Form (PDF),
Form 2.

iii. Marketing

This refers to the various personal marketing strategies employed in

the disposal of the nominees catch. This also rates how efficient he
finds market for his produce. Please refer to item 10 of the Personal
Data Form (PDF), (Form 2).

3. Records Keeping

This evaluates the available records maintained by the nominee that accounts
to catch, sales, and expenses and others.

4. Adoptability of Fishing Practice

This refers to the adoptability of the nominee’s fishing practice by

fisherfolk in the community or in other areas. Please refer to Parts 1
and 2 of the fishing Operations Profile (Form 3) and item 9 of the
Personal Data Form (PDF), (Form 2).

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 5. Other Fishery-related Activities/Businesses

This refers to the fishery-related livelihood and other activities that the
nomine is engaged such as fish trading/marketing, boat feleet
operations, fish processing, volunteering, etc. Please refer to item 12 of
the Personal Data Form (PDF), Form 2 and Financial and Income
Statements of the nominees’ fishery-related livelihood ( Form 4).

c. Fisheries Conservation and Management

This evaluates the involvement and observance of the nominee’s practices on

fisheries management and conservation (compliance and involvement in the
implementation of fishery rules and regulations, disposal of fishing gears and
paraphernalia, appropriate use of fishing materials and technology, proper
disposal of fishing wastes), and involvement on the implementations of
management and conservation programs:

a. Compliance and Involvement in the Implementation of Fishery Laws and

Regulations

The nominee must be compliant with the existing laws, regulations

and/or ordinances implemented for fisheries under Philippine laws and
has neither violated nor been convicted of any charges as Certified by
MA/AT or BFAR for Small Commercial Fishing Boat Operator. Please refer
to item 11 of the Personal Data for (PDF), Form 2

b. Disposal of Garbage and Worn-Out Fishing Gear/ Paraphernalia

This rates the practice and advocacy of the nominee on the proper
communal/ onboard garbage/waste disposal, etc., worn-out fishing gears
and practices on lost fishing gears. Applicable supporting pictures should
be provided in the scrap book. Please refer to Part 2 of the Fishing
Operations Profile (Form 3)

c. Involvement in Fisheries Program

This refers to the degree of participation and involvement of the nominee,

either an advocate or an implementer, and participants of the government
and NGO’s program/projects concerning the proper management and
conservation of fishery resources. Please refer to items 11, 16, and 17 of
the Personal Data Form (PDF), Form 2.

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 i.Implementer

This refers the nominee as a leader or key persons in the actual

implementation of fishery-related management and conservation
program.

ii. Advocate

This refers to the nominee as a leader or key persons that

advocates/initiate or endorse fishery-related programs/projects.

iii. Participant

This refer to the nominee as merely a participant to the implantation of

fishery-related activities.

d. Socio – Economic Aspect

This refers to the nominee’s contribution to the socio-economic development of

his/her family and community.

a. Family

This will assess the nominee’s impact to the education/ upbringing of

children/dependent. Also includes family members’ involvement in political,
social, civic, and religious organizations/s and activities. Please refer to items
8 and 15 of the Personal Data Form (PDF) , Form 2.

b. Community

This is a assessment of the nominee’s socio-economic contribution to the

community including employment and livelihood as generated by his fishing
operations.

It also includes the nominee’s involvement in political, social, civic, and

religious organizations/s and activities. Please refer to items 16 and 17 of the
Personal Data Form (PDF), Form 2.

c. Other Sources of Income

As fish capture is not a month-long or a year-round activity, fisherfolks are

encouraged to have alternative sources of incomes as a measure to improve
sustainability of the fishery resources. Thus, this evaluates the
involvement/engagement of the nominee in the non-fishery-related

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 livelihoods. Please refer to item 13 of the Personal Data Form (PDF), Form 2
and Financial and Income Statement of the nominee’s non-fishery-related
business ( Form 4).

d. Nomination Form

A nomination form duly accomplished by the nominating person, head of civic

organization or fisherfolk association (Annex 1: Form I) should be certified
by the Municipal Agriculturist or Agricultural Technologist (MA/AT) in the
case of municipal nominee or the MA/AT and BFAR Regional Office
Authorized Representative in case of small-scale nominee.

e. Information Sheet
The nominee is required to submit the relevant background information,
fishing methods and practices and other related information. The
Information Sheet required should be stated under Forms 2, 3, and 4.

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING FISHERFOLK
FISH CAPTURE CATEGORY

Name/Institution :
Address :

Province/Region :
Justification for :
Nomination

Nominated by :
Signature Over Printed Name
Position :
Address :

Assisting Technician :
Signature Over Printed Name

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

OUTSTANDING FISHERFOLK Recent 2x2 Picture

FISH CAPTURE CATEGORY (2 Copies)

NAME :
Surname First Name Middle Name
ADDRESS :
Brgy Town Region
CITIZENSHIP: ___________________________ SEX : ___________ CIVIL STATUS : _____________

DATE OF BIRTH : ________________ PLACE OF BIRTH : _____________________________________________

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT: ___________________________________________________________________________
NAME OF SPOUSE (If Married): __________________________________________________________________________
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT: ___________________________________________________________________________
OCCUPATION: _____________________________________________________________________________________________
NUMBER OF DEPENDENTS: ______________
a. Name Relationship Age Education
____________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ ________________
____________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ ________________
____________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ ________________
____________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ ________________
____________________________________ ___________________________ ____________ ________________

b. Describe upbringing of children and family values you can inculcate in them
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

c. Describe briefly your fishing operations (Technologist used, sustainability and viability of
fishing operations, etc.)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

d. Describe your post-harvest handling and utilization practices (containers used, icing
methods, processing done, use of preservatives, etc.)

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
e. Describe your actual contribution as a fisherman in resource management and
conservation
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

f. Fishery related Businesses

Type of Business Estimated Laborers Salary/
Income/year Scheme

___________________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ______________

___________________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ______________
___________________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ______________
___________________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ______________
___________________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ______________

g. Non-Fishery related source of income

Source Estimated Laborers
Income/Year
___________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________
___________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________
___________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________
___________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________
___________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________

h. History of expansion/diversion since the start of his/her fishing operations and other
fishery-related businesses. (Assets acquired and capital outlays for other investments)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

i. Savings, Housing Improvements and Real State Acquisitions

Date Amount of
Acquisition Purchase
1. Housing Improvements ________________________ ______________________
2. Real Estate Acquired ________________________ ______________________
3. Savings ________________________ ______________________
4. Appliances ________________________ ______________________

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

5. Others (i.e. Tricycle, Motorcycle, ________________________ ______________________

Etc.)

j. Community Involvement
1. Membership in Civic/Religious Organizations/Associations (State period when
position is held)

Position Inclusive Dates Organization/ Number

Association of
members
___________________________ ______________________ ____________________________ _______________
___________________________ ______________________ ____________________________ _______________
2. Community Activities Involved in for the last two years
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Submitted by:
________________________________________
Signature of
Fisherman

Thumb mark
Certified Correct:

For Municipal Fisherman Nominee For Small Scale Commercial Fisherman Nominee

Fisheries/Agriculture Technician BFAR-RFO (Licensing Division's Officer)

(Signature over printed name) (Signature over printed name)

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 OUTSTANDING FISHERFOLK
FISH CAPTURE CATEGORY

MAXIMUM
EVALUATION CRITERIA SHEET
POINT SCORE
a. The Nominee 19
1. Character 5

Immediate Family : 3 Respondents (any of the following: Wife,

Children, In-laws, Siblings, Parents) Average Perception Score of 5=3 3
points; Average of 4=2 points; Average of 3=1 point, Below 3= 0 point

Community : 6 Respondents (any of the following: Mayor, A.T., Brgy.

Capt., BFARMC, Church Leader, 2 Neighbors) Average of 5 = 2 points; 2
Average of 3-4=1 point; Below 3=0 point

2. Leadership/Membership to Organizations (Maximum Score of 8

8
Points for this Criteria)

President/Chairperson or Vice President – Chairperson

> 5 Associations/Organizations 8
3-4 Associations/Organizations 7
1-2 Associations/Organizations 6

Other Positions or Member

> 5 Associations/Organizations
5
3-4 Associations/Organizations
4
1-2 Associations/Organizations
3

3. Management Skills
6
4
i. Resilience and Innovativeness (Respondent: Nominee)

1. How do you manage situations during hard times (i.e. low catch,
calamities, engine/boat/gear damage or breakdown etc.)
(maximum of 3 point for positive response)

2. Has the nominee introduced innovative ways to improve fishing?

(maximum of 4 points for positive response)

ii. Labor Practices (Respondent: Laborer and Fisherfolk)

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 1. Sharing system should be based from established practice of 2
50/50 Sharing System from the Net Profit in fishing. (maximum of
2 points for positive response)

2. Sharing system should be based from other fishery-related

sources of income. (maximum of 2 points for positive response)

b. Fishing Operation 42

1. Actual Fishing 15

i. Sustainable Fishing Technologies and Methods 5

a. Fishing gears and methods used are in accordance with
the existing policies and regulations (Yes=5 points; No=0
Point)

ii. Safety of Life at Sea (a. Available life-saving devices on board

i.e GPS/Compass, Life buoy/ Ring buoy, Lifejacket, Axe/Bolo, 5
Flashlight, Mobile Phone, Fire Extinguisher for Small
Commercial, Navigational Chart, etc.)

> 3=5
2=4
1=3
None = 0

iii. Involvement in Actual Fishing

Full time (At least 15-20 days/month) = 3 pts 3
Part time (<14 days / month) = 2 pts
Occasional ( < once a week) = 1 pt
Non – practicing = 0

iv. Catch rate, quantity and species caught

Increasing/ Same CPUE = 1 pt 2
Absence of CITES species 1
in catch = 1 pt ; Presence = 0 point
1

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 2. Postharvest Practices 6

i. Fish Handling Onboard (Use of Ice = 2; Live handling = 2; 2

Container w/o Ice = 1, No container, no ice = 0 point)

ii. Value Adding of Products (Yes = 1; No = 0) 1

iii. Marketing
2
a. Nominee personally markets his produce to consumers = 1 pt
1
b. Nominee sells to middleman = 0 pt

3
3. Records Keeping

i. Min. 2 years = 3 pts; <2 years = 0 pt

4. Productivity of Fishing Operation 8

i. Profitability (> 50% ROI = 5 pts; 30% - 49% = 3 pts; <30% = 2 pts)
ii. Build-up/ Expansion of Operation (With expansion = 3 points;
Without = 1)

5. Adoptability/Replicability of Fishing Practice (Number of Adopters) 5

More than 5 adopters = 5 pts

4-5 adopters = 4 pts
1-3 adopters = 3 pts
None = 0 pt

5
6. Other Fishery related Activities/Businesses

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 More than 3 fishery related activities = 5 pts
2 fishery related activities = 4 pts
1 fishery related activity = 3 pts
None = 0 pt

24
c. Fisheries Conservation and Management

1. Compliance and Involvement in the Implementation of

12
Fishery Laws and Regulations
i. Compliance
5
No Violations = 5 pts
ii. Involvement
7
As Bantay Dagat = 3 pts
As FARMC = 2 pts
Participation to the enactment of National/Local
Regulation or Programs/Project/Activities = 2 pts
None = 0 pt

2. Disposal of Garbage and Worn-Out Fishing

Gear/Paraphernalia
5
Practices proper communal/onboard waste disposal
Practices proper disposal of worn-out fishing 3
gear/paraphernalia
2

3. Involvement in Fisheries Program/ Projects

i. Implementor = 7 pts 7
ii. Advocator = 5 pts
iii. Participant = 4 pts
iv. None = 0 pts

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

 15
d. Socio-Economic Aspect

1. Family
5
i. Education of Children/Siblings/Immediate Family
Member (if nominee has children, all should have
2
attended school. If single or no child, automatic 2 pts)
ii. Member’s involvement in political, social, civic and
religious organizations (Members = 2, No membership
= 0 pt)
iii. Housing Improvements (with improvement = 2 pts;
2
Without = 0 pt)

2. Community 2
i. Employment Generation/ Other Contribution to the
Community’s Economy
5
ii. Involvement in political, social, civic, and religious
organizations
2
iii. Taxpayer (if more than PhP 250,000, annual income or
Certificate of Tax Exemption if Below)
1
3. Other Sources of Income
> 3 other sources of income = 5 pts 2
2 other sources of income = 4pts
1 other source of income = 3 pts
None = 0 pts 5

100
TOTAL

Outstanding Fisherfolk - Fish Capture

ANNEX 16. Fisheries
Aquaculture
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING FISHERFOLK-AQUACULTURE
(Pond Aquaculture/ Sea Farming/ Mariculture/ Fishpen/ Cage Operation)

I. RATIONALE

The Philippines produces more than 4.4 metric tons of fish annually. The fishery products,
comprised of the richest diversity of species anywhere in the world, are harvested almost in all
shallow coastal and deep marine waters around the archipelago. Fisheries provide employment
to about 1.5 million people-fishermen. Development efforts in fisheries are directed to the
management of specific coastal resources and lakes, strict enforcement of fishery laws, provision
of infrastructure, market transport and harvest services and facilities. Increase in fish production
shall come from municipal, aquaculture and commercial fisheries.

In response to the challenges of globalization and more recently, climate change, in the fishery
sector and because of its importance in the national economy, the Department of Agriculture
launched Ginintuang Masaganang Ani –Fisheries Program that aims to increase productivity;
reduce and prevent environmental degradation for long-term sustainability; adapt effective
modern technologies that will increase the potentials for the improvement of aquaculture
operations; promote industrialization and make full and efficient use of human and natural
resources. The program will implement intervention to compensate for the continuous decline
in fish production from capture fisheries through innovations, sustainable and environment-
friendly aquaculture management practices.

The Department of Agriculture, in its effort to documents and showcase aquaculture as a

competitive enterprise in line with sustainable fisheries development corollary to the Fisheries
Program, launches the Search for Outstanding Fisherfolk- Aquaculture Award. The search shall
give due recognition to outstanding fish farmers to sustain enthusiasm in the government’s
sustainable development and management efforts in fisheries.

II. OBJECTIVES

General Objectives

a. Give due recognition to fish farmers to their exemplary performance and achievement on
aquaculture.
b. Provide in incentives to fish farmers to enhance their technologies, improve their
production and income-generating activities and empower them to contribute to the
welfare and socio-economic upliftment to their communities.
c. Document success stories in aquaculture and provide role models that other small fish
farmers can emulate.
d. Strengthen research and development efforts in aquaculture in the Department of
Agriculture by providing a venue wherein innovations made and proven efficient and
effective by experienced fish farmers can gathered and made available for further
promotion for adoption by other farmers.

Outstanding Fisherfolk – Aquaculture

 Specific Objectives

a. Conduct an annual search for OUTSTANDING FISHERFOLK (Aquaculture Category) as

part of the yearly GAWAD-SAKA of the Department of Agriculture;
b. Adopt a systematic search process to come up with an outstanding fish farmer who is
beyond reproach and most deserving award; and
c. Disseminate and promote the winning fish farmer’s technological innovations with him
as a resource person.

III. SCOPE

The GAWAD-SAKA for Outstanding Fisherfolk – (Aquaculture) is an a annual nationwide

search for fish farmers who has demonstrated exemplary performance and has met the
qualification standards set forth in these guidelines.

Definition of Terms:

Aquaculture is defined as fishery operations involving all form of raising and culturing
fish and fishery species in fresh, brackish and marine areas as defined in the
Philippines Fisheries Code of 1998 (RA 8550).

Fish farmer is defined as a person directly or personally and physically engaged in

culturing of fish and other fishery species in fresh, brackish and marine areas.

Fishery Operation is defined as one who owns and provides the means including labor,
capital, fishing gear, and vessels, but does not personally engage in fishery.

Production Unit(s) – watered area of the aquaculture farm used for production up to
marketable size

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

a. Qualification of Pond Aquaculture Operations Nominees

1. A Filipino citizen of good moral characters as duly certified by the Barangay

Chairman;
2. Must not be an employee / officials of the Department of Agriculture;
3. Must be a fish farmer, duly registered under the fish registration (fishR)
Program of BFAR;
4. Must be duly registered owner/ lessee of the production unit(s) of the
aquaculture farm of not more than five (5) hectares aggregates areas;
5. Must be operating the fish farm for at least there (3), duly supported with the
official ITR for the least three (3) years.
6. Must not have violated any provincial/ municipal ordinances; Fisheries
Administrative Orders (FAOs) and or any fishery law;
7. Must not use banned, harmful and non-biodegradable chemicals/ pesticides.

Outstanding Fisherfolk – Aquaculture

 b. Qualification of Sea Farming/ Mariculture/ Fishpen/ Cage Operation Nominees

1. A Filipino citizen of good moral characters as duly certified by the Barangay

Chairman;
2. Must not be an employee / officials of the Department of Agriculture;
3. Must be a fish pen/ fish cage/ mariculture farmer, duly registered under the fish
registration (fishR) program of BFAR, LLDA, LGU or any authorized licensing
agency of the Department of Agriculture;
4. Must be actively engaged in farming with an aggregate area of not more than one
(1) hectare (ha) for seaweed and bivalve mariculture, five (5) ha for freshwater
fish pen and one (1) ha for fish cage, situated within the aquaculture zone;
5. Must not have violated any provincial/ municipal ordinances. Fisheries
Administrative Orders (FAOs) and/ fishery law.
6. Must not use banned, harmful and non-biodegradable chemicals/ pesticides.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

a. Documentation

The nominee’s Scrapbook shall include the following:

a. Table of Contents
b. Form 1. Nomination Form
c. Form 2. Nominee Data Form
d. Income Tax Return (ITR) for the past two (2), duly certified by BIR
e. Certification from the Barangay Chairman that the nominees is a resident of the
locality, a Filipino citizen, a non-DA employee, of good moral character
f. Certification of registered from BFAR (FishR), LLDA, LGU and other licensing
agencies of the Department of Agriculture;
g. Documentation of claims on any accomplishment or citation of the previous year.

b. Other Documents

The following documents shall be submitted to the National Technical Committee:

a. Accomplished evaluation form signed by the Regional Evaluators;

b. Accomplished Comparative Assessment Form signed by the Regional Search
Committee; and
c. Submission of video footage (maximum of 5 minutes) of operational activities,
Farm/pond cage structure and other activities / factors that need to be given
special focus.

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

There are four (4) Major indicators. These are:

a. Technology;
b. Productivity;
c. Environment Impact; and
d. Contribution to the Community.

Outstanding Fisherfolk – Aquaculture

 Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING FISHERFOLK-AQUACULTURE

Name/Institution : ________________________________________________________________________________________

Address : ________________________________________________________________________________________

Province/Region : ________________________________________________________________________________________
Justification for Nomination: _____________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nominated by : ___________________________________________________________________________________________
Signature Over Printed Name

Position : ___________________________________________________________________________________________
Address : ___________________________________________________________________________________________

Assisting Technician : _____________________________________________________________________________________

Signature Over Printed Name

Outstanding Fisherfolk – Aquaculture

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

OUTSTANDING FISHERFOLK – AQUACULTURE

2x2
Picture

1. Name :
________________________________________________________________________________________________
(Surname) (First Name) (Middle Initial)

2. Address:
(Barangay) (Town) (Province)

3. Citizenship: Sex : Civil Status :

4. Date of Birth: Place of Birth:
5. Educational Attainment:
6. Name of Spouse (If Married):
7. Number of Dependent:

Name Relationship Age Education

(if more than three (3) dependents, write in separate pages)

8. Type of Project (Pond, cage, pen, seaweed’s and others)

9. Location of Project/s:

10. Species Cultured:

11. Attached records of your fish production operation, production expenses and income.
(Please attached necessary documents.)

12. Describe briefly your fish production operation and improvement or introduces (if any).

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Outstanding Fisherfolk – Aquaculture

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

13. Other sources of income including household members.

Source Estimated income per year

14. Persons who are employed in your project

Activities No. of No. of Days Relationship

Performed Laborers

15. Assets acquired during the last two (2) years. Including housing improvements, appliances and
capital outlays for the other investment. (Submit copy of Income Tax Return for the last two years,
duly certified by the BIR).

Item Amount

16. Describe your management practices (pond, cage, pen, seaweed’s, feeding, stocking, water
management, etc.)

Submitted by:

Signature of Fish Farmer

Certified Correct:

AT/MA

Outstanding Fisherfolk – Aquaculture

 Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

OUTSTANDING FISHERFOLK-AQUACULTURE

INDICATORS POINTS INDICATOR

A. Technology 25
1. Innovativeness
(E.g. pond design, feeding system, species combination, 10
pollution abatement, handling , etc.
➢ 3 or more 10 pts
➢ 2 innovation 7 pts
➢ 1 innovation 4 pts
➢ None 1 pt
2. Management Practices 15
(Please refer to prescribed management practices
guidelines for evaluation
➢ Excellent 15 pts
➢ Good 12 pts
➢ Fair 8 pts
➢ Poor 4 pts
INDICATORS POINTS INDICATOR
B. Productivity 25
1. Return of Investment 15
(Net income for three (3) years over the investment )
➢ Above 60 % of ROI 15 pts
➢ 50%-59% ROI 10 pts
➢ Less than 50% ROI 5 pts
2. Production Per Unit Area/ Year 10
( reference productivity level is regions average
scoring)
➢ More than 50% above average 10 pts
➢ 25% - 50% above average 8 pts
➢ Less than 25% above average 7 pts
➢ Average 6pts
➢ Below regions average 5 pts
C. Environmental Impact 30
1. Environment Friendly Management Practices
(Feeding system, human activity of the worker and
caretaker, predator control, etc.)
2. Conservation Measures 15
a. Pond Aquaculture
➢ Mangrove reforestation between River
banks and main dikes */
➢ Riprapping of Dikes
➢ Wave breaker outside to prevent rapid
erosion/ dike destruction */
➢ Planting creeping vegetation on dikes
➢ Diversion canal for run-off water

Outstanding Fisherfolk – Aquaculture

 Scoring
➢ All –Excellent 15 pts
➢ 3-4- Good 12 pts
➢ 1-2- Fair 8 pts
➢ None-Poor 6 pts

‘* Additional requirement for Brackishwater Pond

b. Fish Pen Culture
➢ Farm area must be situated within the
designated aquaculture zone
➢ Farm is at least 20 m. away from another pen
and 50 m. from shoreline
➢ Safeguard away against rapid silting in the
farm area
Scoring
➢ If both- Excellent 15 pts
➢ 1 only- Good 12 ts
c. Cages
➢ Farm area must be situated within the
designated
aquaculture zone
➢ Proper disposal of net and rotten bamboo
is practiced
➢ Cage at least 7m. away from another
module and 50m away from the shoreline
Scoring
➢ If both –Excellent 15 pts
➢ 1 only-Good 12 pts
➢ None-Poor 6 pts
d. Mariculture
➢ Farm Area must be situated within the
designated aquaculture zone
➢ Safeguard against siltation. Line shoulder be
set accordance with the law.
➢ Farming Operation of Seaweeds’ only
Scoring
➢ If both –Excellent 15 pts
➢ 1 only-Good 12 pts
➢ None-Poor 6 pts
D. Contribution to the Community 20
a. Technology Transfer 5
(Extent of the technology used in the community
or
adjacent areas)
b. Contribution to Local Economy 10
(Such as employment generation, increase to
food
supply, etc.)
c. Participation in Community Organizations/s 5
TOTAL 100

Outstanding Fisherfolk – Aquaculture

ANNEX 17. Farmer/
Fisherfolk Family
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING FARMER/FISHERFOLK FAMILY

I. RATIONALE
The Philippines is predominantly an agricultural country. Our government,
therefore, gives priority to the development of agriculture to enable the 70% of
Filipinos who live in the rural areas and dependent on agriculture for their main
source of livelihood, to maximize their contributions to the national economy.
Hence, the Filipino Farm/Fisherfolk Family has been referred to as the
“backbone of the nation”, the “focus of our economic recovery” and the
“indispensable partner in the national venture” so much so that Article IV,
Section 3, of the Constitution provides that “The State shall defend the right of
families or family associations to participate in the planning and implementation
of policies and programs that affect them”.

Family farming in the Philippines is more than just family-managed activity, but it
speaks of multiple dimensions and how a typical Filipino family engages every
member of the household in agriculture. Yet, despite the initiatives of the different
institutions offering to improve the lives of the people behind the food production
in the country, family farmers remain the most vulnerable sector. The United
Nations Decade of Family Farming or the (UNDFF) 2019-2028 aims to shed new
light on what it means to be a family farmer in a rapidly changing world and
highlights more than ever before the important role they play in eradicating hunger
and shaping our future of food.

As a family enterprise, farming/fishing and/or agribusiness in this country is

undertaken as a joint collaborative effort among the head, the spouse and their
children. Together, they take farming/fishing and/or agribusiness as family
activities – tilling the soil, pond preparation, fishing, planting the seeds, monitoring
plant health and growth, harvesting/marketing the produce and other agriculture
related activities as a team effort for the sake of producing food for the entire
Philippine populace. Thus, the family as entrepreneur who contribute
significantly to the development of the rural sector.

For this invaluable contribution, the Department of Agriculture deems it fitting to

pay tribute to the farmer/fisherfolk family by conducting the “Search for the
Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family of the Year (OFFFY)”. This endeavor is
expected to motivate and weld the farm family as a cohesive productive force in
our society and recognize it as one of the cores of our socio-economic
development efforts. It is also designed to give recognition to those who ideally
contributed to our country’s food productivity and self-sufficiency. Moreoever, the
search for OFFFY aims to promote wholesome family farmer/fisherfolk life that
will serve as model for the present and succeeding generations.

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 II. OBJECTIVES

General Objectives:
a. To conduct annual search for Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family; and
b. To come up with awardees who are beyond reproach.
Specific Objectives
a. To recognize the exemplary performance of farmer/fisherfolk family engaged
in agricultural, fishery, rural and social development undertaking.
b. To contribute to agriculture and fishery development by strengthening the
farmer/fisherfolk family approach.
c. To project farming/fishing as a productive and profitable enterprise for the
Filipino family.
d. To pay tribute to farmer/fisherfolk family entrepreneur as role model to the
rest of the farm/fisherfolk families for countryside development.

III. SCOPE

The Search provides awards for Outstanding Farm/Fisherfolk Family who

successfully demonstrated exemplary performance.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

To qualify for the search under the Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family Category,
the following qualifications should be met:

1. The family’s major source of income should be farming/fishing and/or

agribusiness for a period of at least five (5) years. They must be a Filipino
family of good moral character, duly certified by the Barangay Chairman;

2. The parents are full-time farmers/fisherfolks or engaged in fishing and the

family members are actively participating in farming or fishing and
agribusiness;

3. The farm family actually tills not more than five (5) hectares. The family may
either be landowner, lessee or tenant;
If fisherfolk family, may own either of the following:
- a fishing boat and a fishing gear of not more than 3 gross tons;
- fishpond of not more than 5 hectares;
- fish cages (1 ha surface area or less);
- seafarm (1 ha or less);
- fishpens (3 hectares)

4. Any one member of the family must be registered under any of the following
registry systems:
Registry System for Basic Sector in Agriculture (RSBSA)

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 National Program for Municipal Fisherfolk Registration (FishR)
National Coconut Farmers Registry Program (NCRFS)
Farmers and Fisherfolk Enterprise Development Information System
(FFEDIS)
Others, specify

5. Any one member of the family must be an active member of agri-based rural
organization or fishery organization;

6. Both parents (mother/father) must not be related by affinity or consanguinity

with any current elected official in the Local Government Units (LGUs), and
heads of DA offices (Director level and up) up to second degree (except in IP
Communities); and

7. The family must demonstrate that they are able to enjoy the basic needs of life
through farming or fishing and agribusiness.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENT

a. Scrapbook. The Nominee’s scrapbook shall be prepared by the nominees,

assisted/guided by the nominating individual or organization, and should follow
this format:

1. Table of contents;
2. Nominator’s validation/justification for proposing the award;
3. Duly filled-up Form 1. Nomination Form and Form 2. Nominee Data
Form, with 2 copies of 2x2 picture;
4. Certified True/Photocopy of Certificate of Marriage or Affidavit of
two (2) parties attesting their marriage;
5. Farm Lay-out;
6. Farm/Fishery Plan Budget;
7. Farmer/Fisherfolk family household expense account for two (2)
years;
8. Farm/Fishery Profit Record indicating Return on Investment (ROI);
9. Evidence of Income Tax Return (ITR) payment for two (2) years (if
exempted, Certificate of Tax Exemption duly certified by the BIR);
10. Relevant photographs with explanatory captions.; and
11. Record/summary of operations, expenses, yield and income per
commodity within review year, following the matrix below:

COST AND RETURN

Commodity Yield Gross Cost of Net Income
Income Production (PhP)
(PhP) (PhP)

Total

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 b. Supporting Documents
1. Five-minute video coverage which features the nominee’s project based on
the criteria;
2. Certification from the Barangay Captain that the nominee is a
Filipino citizen, of good character and a bonafide farmer;
3. Certification from financing institution that the nominee has a good
credit standing (if applicable); and
4. All documents and materials indicating specific meritorious contributions and
accomplishments in the field of endeavor.

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The following three (3) areas are considered in evaluating an Outstanding

Farm/Fisherfolk Family:

a. Farm/Fishery Management and Profitability

1. Farm/Fishery Planning and Budgeting
2. Farm/Fishery Management Practice
3. Farm/ Fishery Enterprise

b. Farmer/Fisherfolk Family Life

1. Farm/Fisherfolk Family Resource
Management
2. Home Lot Productivity
3. Farm/Fisherfolk Family Enterprise
Continuity
4. Family Relationship

c. Community
Leadership/Participation/Contribution/Achievements
1. Active Leadership/participation in any farmer/fisherfolk civic
organization
2. Community Activities
3. Economic Contribution of the Family
4. Entrepreneurial Contribution

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING FARMER/FISHERFOLK FAMILY

Name/Institution : _______

Address :

Province/Region :

Justification for Nomination :

Nominated by :
Signature Over Printed Name

Position :

Address :

Assisting Technician :
Signature Over Printed Name

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

OUTSTANDING FARMER/FISHERFOLK FAMILY

Head of the Family

Recent 2x2 Picture

1. Name of Nominee : ___

(Head of the Family) (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Name)

2. Address : _______
3. Date and Place of Birth : ________________
4. Educational Attainment : ________
5. Name of Spouse : ________
6. Date of Birth of Spouse : _______
7. Number of Household Members:
Name Relationship Age Educational Occupation
with the Attainment
Respondent

(Use separate sheet if needed)

8. House:
a. _____ Owned
_____ Rented
_____ Others, specify

b. If Owned,
_____ Had it constructed
_____ Bought
_____ Inherited
_____ Others, specify

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

9. Lot:
_____ Lease
_____ Owned
_____ Rented
_____ Gift
_____ Others, specify

10. Farm Location (km. from the house):

11. Farm Area
Present Area (ha):
Original Area (ha):
12. Tenure: __________ Owner: __________ Lease: __________ Tenant: __________
13. Do you keep record including farm/fishery operations, production expenses and income?
__________ Yes __________ No
14. Main Farm/Fishery Enterprise:
15. What homeyard products do you have? How do these projects help augment your family
income? Indicate the details of the specific homeyard projects your family undertake.

Commodity Year Area (ha) Gross Production Net Income ROI (%)
Income Cost (Php) (Php
(Php)

TOTAL Php Php Php

(Use separate sheet if needed)
16. Community Involvement/Participation/Contribution/Achievement

A1. Membership in Civic Organization/Association related to Agriculture & Significant

Contribution
Position Organization/Association Significant Contribution
a. Head of Household
b. Spouse
c. Other Members of the Family
(Use separate sheet if needed)
A2. Involvement in Community Activities to the past 3 years (Describe briefly)

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

A3. How many of your children are current members of civic/4H Club and/or any
agriculture related organization? Enumerate and describe its participation

A4. Community Standing/Activities (for the past 3 years). Describe briefly.

B. Economic Contribution of the Family (Describe briefly)

C. Awards and recognition by the family members of the last 5 years

Signature of Head of Family

over Printed Name

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

OUTSTANDING FARMER/FISHERFOLK FAMILY

I. Family Profile

1. Name of Family Members:

Father :
Age :

Mother :
Age :

Child/Children:
Age/s :

2. Contact address/mobile phone no./e-mail address:

3. Farm Location:

II. Brief History of the Family

III. Farm Enterprise

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

IV. Market
Market Destination
Domestic

Others

V. Buyers
Type of Buyers Name
e.g. wholesalers, contract growers,
hotels, supermarts
Domestic

Others

VI. Management Practices Used in the Farm/Plant Production

Record/Cost and Return Analysis (ROI)

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

Indicators Points Distribution

45
I. FARM/FISHERY MANAGEMENT AND PROFITABILITY
A. Farm/Fishery Plan/Development 5
1. Farm/Fishery Plan/Development Plan
(Short/long term)

Do you have a farm lay-out of your farm? 3

2. Work and Financial Plan/Budget

Do you have work and financial plan/budget for the entire year?
2

B. Farm/Fishery Management Practice 20

1. Adoption of Appropriate Management Technologies 5
(from DA/BMPs)

• Crops
Use of high yielding varieties
Water Management
Soil and fertilizer management
Climate change mitigation
Others, specify

• Livestock
Livestock sanitation & disease control
Feeds and feeding management
Breeding management
Climate change mitigation
Others, specify

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

• Fishery
Aquaculture
High quality genetic stocks
Good stock manipulation
Proper pond construction & manipulation
Good water quality management
Selection of good quality fry
Proper stocking density
Feeds and biofeeding
Climate Change mitigation
Others, specify

• Marine
Use of environment-friendly gear (e.g. non-destructive
gear mesh, size of net should not be less than 3 cm)
Fishing gear of not more than 3 tons
Effectiveness of gear (economic/income)
Climate change mitigation
Others, specify

• Processing
Maximize utilization of low commercial value species to
reduce p-h losses
Application of sanitation and hygiene
Production of good quality product
Application of proper packaging
Others, specify

Note: More than two (2) technologies = 7

1-2 technologies =5

Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

2. Application of improved/developed technologies (initiated 5
by the farmer/fisherfolk; upscaled throughout the farm)

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

What are the improved/developed technologies that are being

implemented/applied in the farm? Specify.

Fisheries (Aquaculture): What are the improved/developed

technologies that are being implemented/applied? Specify.

Fisheries (Marine): What are the improved/developed

technologies that are being implemented/applied? Specify.

3. Post-Harvest Handling/Practices 5

Do you observe proper post-harvest handling practices? (drying

pavement/tresher/milling/proper icing/proper container
transport)

Fisheries (Aquaculture): Do you observe proper post-harvest

handling practices? (mini ice plant, freezer, dryer (processed
products)/proper icing/processing area/proper container
transport, etc.)

Fisheries (Marine): Do you observe proper post-harvest

handling practices? (mini ice plant, freezer, dryer (processed
products)/
proper icing/processing area/proper container transport, etc.)

4. Marketing Technique 5

Where do you sell your produce?

Cooperative
Others, specify
How do you sell produce? (Product promotion strategies)
C. Farm/Fishery Enterprise (Agricultural Production) 20
1. Farm/Fishery Journal 5

Complete and properly kept = 5

Incomplete = 3

2. Financial Statements/Net Income Generated 5

3. Return on Investment/Farm/Fishery Enterprise Profitability 10

>200% ROI = 10
150 – 200% ROI = 9
100 – 150% ROI = 8
<100% ROI = 7

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

II. FARM/FISHERFOLK FAMILY LIFE 35

A. Farm/Fisherfolk Family Resource Management 5
Cleanliness and Home/Backyard Organization =3
Nutrition, Health and Sanitation =2

B. Home Lot Productivity 8

1. Backyard Productivity (poultry & livestock production
& crop cultivation within the backyard) =2

• Other Fishery-related productivity such as

boat rentals, etc =2

2. Agri-related projects (studies and initiatives)

e.g. vermin production, vermitea =4

• Fishery-related projects such as utilization/processing

of unsold fishery products, boat rentals and other
fishery-related add-on productivity initiative

C. Farm/Fisherfolk Family Enterprise Continuity 16

1. Emphasis on importance of agricultural education

Have the family members attended

agricultural/fishery-related trainings?
Is agricultural/fishery education encouraged? =3

2. Technology transfer within family members

Are the family members aware of significant aspects of

the agriculture/fishery enterprise?
How is it done? =3

3. Family member participation in farm/fishery work

What are the roles of each member of the

family in the agriculture/fishery enterprise? =5

4. Enterprise continuity (Agriculture/Fishery production

enthusiasts among members)

Do you have any members of your family who is interested

in continuing the agriculture/fishery enterprise?
How do you see your enterprise in the next 5 years? = 5

D. Family Relationship 6
1. Religious duties =2
2. Recreational activities/Leisure time =2
3. Household duties =2

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

 Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

III. CONTRIBUTION TO COMMUNITY AND ACHIEVEMENTS 20

A. Participation in Civic Organizations related to 10
Agriculture/Fisheries
1. Membership and attendance =3

2. Significant Contributions to the Community

(farmer/fishery-led extension worker, resource person;
achievements)

Ext. worker, resource person, with award = 7

Extension worker with awards =6
With awards alone =5

B. Economic Contribution 5
1. Provision of Employment Opportunities

Do you provide jobs?

Permanent
Seasonal
5 or more jobs =5
3 – 4 jobs =4
1 – 2 jobs =3

C. Entrepreneurial Initiatives 5
Other Agri/Fishery-related ventures (e.g. Manufacturing
and processing, buying and selling of agricultural
products)

What are other agri/fishery-related ventures that your

family
is involved in?
How did you strat?
Did you seek the intervention of the government? (LGU,
DA-RFU, other government agencies)

Outstanding Farmer/Fisherfolk Family

ANNEX 18. Rural
Improvement Club
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING RURAL IMPROVEMENT CLUB

I. RATIONALE

The Rural Improvement Club (RIC) is a non-government women's organization technically

assisted by the Agricultural Technician of a local government unit. It is a voluntary
barangay-based organization, composed of a minimum membership of 25 rural women
with varied interests and capabilities, and is mobilized for agricultural and socio-economic
projects. It is also a functional group of women, which serves as a channel for developing
women’s leadership and potential towards home and community improvement.

Through collective efforts, the club aims to bring about effective involvement and
participation of rural women in home and community projects. In the process, the club
members develop organizational and leadership skills, resourcefulness, entrepreneurial
skills, and appreciation for cultural values and heritage. Thus, they become useful citizens,
ideal wives and mothers, functional economic partners in development, and active
community volunteer workers.

The Department of Agriculture recognizes the vital contributions of the RICs, in agricultural
and rural improvement. It has, therefore, been included in the DA annual Gawad Saka
Search for Outstanding Achievers, the search for Outstanding RIC as one of the categories
to highlight the RIC’s contributions and to give due recognition to the
outstanding/performing clubs to sustain their enthusiasm in the development efforts.

II. OBJECTIVES

General Objectives
a. To conduct an annual search for Outstanding Rural
Improvement Club; and
b. b. To come up with awardees who are beyond reproach.

Specific Objectives
a. To highlight the contributions of RICs as functional partners in
agricultural and rural development;
b. To recognize the outstanding/performing RICs to sustain their
enthusiasm and active pursuance of their agro-industrial
endeavors;
c. To encourage other RICs to actively participate in community
development projects; and
d. To motivate RICs to serve as model women's organizations.

III. SCOPE
a. The RIC must be a formal organization duly accredited or registered
with the DOLE, SEC, A-LGU, or any relevant government
agency/institution.
b. The RIC must be an active organization at the time of nomination and
for the past three (3) years.
c. The RIC must have at least 25 members of Filipino nationality.

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 d. The activities and projects of the RICs must be in line with the thrusts of the DA.
e. At least 75% of the members of the Club must have established individual viable
projects and the majority of the members are actively involved in communal
projects.
f. Must be in good credit standing, if loan borrower.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

The search is open to all RICs, the RIC must have been organized and
registered with the RIC of the Philippines.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS
a. Certification of accreditation or registration by the agency concerned (e.g.
DOLE, SEC, DA-LGU, etc.)

b. Certification by MAO or MAFC Chairman that the organization has been

operational for at least three (3) years and that it is a barangay-based
organization and not a federation

c. Other necessary documents:

1. Duly filled-out Forms: Nomination Form (S-RIC Form 1), RIC Profile Form
(S-RIC Form 2, and Evaluation Form (S-RIC Form 3)
2. Organization records for three (3) years.
3. Book of Accounts/Financial Statements for projects for the last three (3)
years, to include:
▪ Source and amount of capital/investment
▪ Detailed expenses per activity (inputs/labor)
▪ Yield per crop; number of offspring produced per animal; yield
of fish per harvest
▪ Sales (by crop, by kind of animal, fishery)
▪ Net Income (by crop, by animal)
▪ Other relevant information
4. Relevant photographs with captions

d. Maximum five (5) minute video presentation of the organization, its

activities and other relevant information.

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

EVALUATION CRITERIA/INDICATORS POINT
DISTRIBUTION

1. Organizational Management (for the last three years) 40

a. Management skills (2 points each) 8

• Leadership - 2

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 • Commitment - 2
• Credibility - 2
• Resourcefulness - 2

A Club that demonstrated all of the said descriptive normative values as part of management
demonstrative skills could receive eight (8) points

b. Conduct of meetings (require minutes of the meeting) 10

Frequency (3)

At least three required meetings per year with the required minutes of the meeting
• three meetings will receive three (3) points
• two meetings will receive two (2) points
• one meeting will receive one (1) point
• no meeting will receive zero.

Attendance (3)

At least required attendance per the conduct of the meeting of

• 75% of the expected attendees will receive three (3) points
• 65% will receive two (2) points
• 55% below one (1) point.

Agreements reached/Resolutions passed (4)

At least 4 Agreements/Resolutions passed within the calendar year 2023 to present will
receive four (4) points
at least 3 agreements/resolutions passed will receive three (3) points
2 agreements/resolutions passed will receive two (2) points
1 agreement/resolution passed will receive one (1) point.

c. Organizational Growth 8

Increase in membership (4)

An increase in members for the last three years

• 30% and above will receive four (4) points
• 29-20% will receive three (3) points
• 19-10% will receive two (2) points
• 9-5% increase will receive one (1) point.

The majority of eligible women in the community are members of (4)

RIC (>50% = 4; 30% < x <50% = 2; <30% = 1)

d. Affiliation with at least 3 other organizations of varied interest 6

Affiliation with other organizations

• At least three other organizations affiliated with the RIC will receive six
(6) points

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 • two organizations will receive four (4) points
• one (1) organization will receive two (2) points.

e. Club’s influence in the community 8

Club’s influence in the community could be measured by the number of economic activities
and proposed projects implemented in the community through the support of either local
government, regional/national government agencies, or other funding institutions. Three (3)
points for a project implemented through the support of local government unit/s; three (3)
points for the project supported by any regional/national government agencies, two (2)
points for a project supported by other funding institutions (e.g. foundation, other NGOs,
private company, and foreign institutions).

2. Economic Activities/Performance 35

a. Business Operations 10

Number of club’s projects (3)

Yearly Net Income (3)

The Club’s net income of at least an average of 15 to 20% per year for the last three years will
receive three-point
at least 10 to 14% per year, 2 points
9 % below, one point.

ROI (4)

Return on investment (ROI) is a profitability metric used to evaluate how well an investment
of an enterprise/project has performed. It is expressed as a percentage and it is calculated by
dividing an investment net profit (or loss) by the initial cost or outlay. For this purpose of
selecting a more profitable operating RIC (with higher ROIs), it is computed as investment net
profit divided by the sum of the average depreciated book value (of an enterprise operation)
plus the total cash cost of the RIC’s operation multiplied by 100.
• 16-20% will receive four (4) points;
• 11-15% ROI will receive three (3) points;
• 6-10% ROI will receive two (2) points
• 1-5% ROI will receive one (1) point.

b. Extent of agribusiness activities (from production to processing 15

and/or trading)

Formal Engagement to Agribusiness (5)

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 • With an integrated operation such as production, processing, trading and marketing
activities in the agri supply chain will receive five (5) points
• with production and trading activity will receive three (3) points
• with production activity will receive one (1) point.

Engagement in value-adding activities (5)

Club level project (3)

For the club-level project

• at least three operating projects will receive three (3) points
• two projects will receive two (2) points
• one project will receive one (1) point.

Individual level project (2)

For individual projects among the Club’s membership, at least 19 individuals or more or less
75% of the total (e.g. for the total of 25 members) of the Club must have established individual
viable projects while majority of the members are involved in the communal projects.

c. Non-agricultural but economic activities 5

Club level (3)

• For the club level non-agricultural economic activities (for example functioning as
financing entity/enterprise by providing savings and loan services to members; product
consolidator/marketing facilitator of members; any social and educational services
provision to members at least three operating projects will receive three (3) points
• two projects will receive two (2) points
• one project, one (1) point.

Individual level (2)

For the individual level non-agricultural activities, At least 19 individuals or more or less 75%
of the total (e.g. for the total of 25 members) of the Club must have established individual viable
projects while the majority of the members are involved in the communal projects.

d. Financial Management System (if RIC has unpaid loans, validate 5

further)

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 • For the RIC with good standing in payment of loans to financial institutions by regularly
paying the amortization or no loan or its arrear incurred to loan provider and the Club
has an existing good financial system in place as an organization will receive five (5)
points
• if there are at least one arrear is incurred and has an existing financial system in place;
four (4) points
• if two arrears are incurred and have an existing financial system in place; three
(3) points
• if one arrear is incurred and has an existing financial system; two (2) points
• if at least there is an existing financial system in place in the organization, one
(1) point

3. Social Activities/Performance 25

a. Human resource development for members and non-members 5

• At least conducting a cumulative of 25 activities for the members or non-members which

may include any of the following activities such as training team building; organizational
planning, attending or participating to meetings organized by the either local, regional,
or national government or business partner/collaborator entity in the last three years
will receive five (5) points;
• cumulative 20 activities will receive four (4) points;
• 15 cumulative activities will receive three (3) points;
• 10 cumulative activities will receive (2) points
• 5 cumulative activities will receive one (1) point.

b. Provision of livelihood projects for non-members (hiring 5

non-members for marketing, etc.)

• At least provided a livelihood projects for at least 25 non-members in the last three
years will receive five (5) points;
• for at least 20 non-members, four (4) points;
• for at least 15 non-members, three (3) points;
• for at least 10 non-members, two (2) points;
• for at least 5 non-members, one (1) point.

c. Community Involvement/services 15

Health and Sanitation/Beautification (3)

• At least three activities related to either health or sanitation/beautification in the last

three years to receive three (3) points;
• at least two activities on the same concerns to receive two (2) points;
• at at least one activity to receive one (1) point.

Nutrition Projects (3)

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 • At least three nutrition projects and activities were done in the last three years
to receive three (3) points;
• at least two nutrition projects to receive two (2) points;
• one project on nutrition project to receive one (1) point.

Spiritual Activities (3)

• At least three spiritual activities were done in the last three years to receive
three (3) points; at least two spiritual activities to receive two (2) points;
• one spiritual activity to receive one (1) point.

Cultural/Sports/Other Community Projects (3)

• At least three cultural/sports/other community projects have implemented

in the last three years to receive three (3) points;
• at least two community projects on the same area of concern to receive
two (2) points;
• one project to receive one (1) point.

Projects on environmental concerns (clean and green, reforestation, (3)

waste management, environment protection, composting, etc.)

• At least three projects on environmental concerns implemented in the last three

years to receive three (3) points;
• two projects implemented to receive two (2) points;
• one project implemented to receive one (1) point.

TOTAL 100

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING RURAL IMPROVEMENT CLUB

Name/Institution : ____________________________________________________________________________

Address : _______________________________________________________________________________________

Province/Region : _____________________________________________________________________________

Justification for Nomination : _________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nominated by: _______________________________________________________________________

Signature Over Printed Name

Position : ____________________________________________________________________________

Address : ____________________________________________________________________________

Assisting Technician : ______________________________________________________________

Signature Over Printed Name

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 Form 2. Nominee Data Sheet

CLUB PROFILE FORM

SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING RURAL IMPROVEMENT CLUB

A. ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE

1. Name of the Club:

2. Address:
(Barangay) (Town) (Province) (Region)
3. Date Organized:
(Month) (Day) (Year)
4. Name of Officers:
Previous Incumbent
a. President ____________________________ _________________________________
b. Vice-President ___________________________ ____________________________
c. Secretary _____________________________ ________________________________
d. Treasurer ___________________________ _________________________________
e. Auditor _______________________________ ________________________________
(Please attach a separate sheet indicating the biggest educational
attainment, major occupation, membership in other organizations
of the incumbent officers)

5. Name of Members: (Please attach accomplishment RIC Membership Form)

6. Financial
a. Initial Amount of capital: Php

After Year: 1 % increase

2 % increase
3 % increase
b. Network

After 1st Year Php

After Year: 1
2
3

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 Form 2. Nominee Data Sheet

7. Affiliation with other Organizations (e.g. Gabriela, etc.)

Note: National RIC should not be included since RIC are automatically
federated up to the national level

Name of Organization Address Date of Affiliation/ Reason for Affiliation

8. Pursuant to the objectives of Women in Development, have you

established your linkages with other women's organizations at the
municipal or barangay level?

[ ] YES [ ] NO

B. ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES/PERFORMANCE

1. Projects Undertaken:
Title of Project/s Source of Fund/s Date Started Status

2. Income from Projects:

Title of Project/s Net Income ROI (%) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
1 _______________________ __________ __________ __________ ________ ________ _______
2 _______________________ __________ __________ __________ ________ ________ _______
3 _______________________ __________ __________ __________ ________ ________ _______

C. SOCIAL ACTIVITIES/COMMUNITY SERVICE

1. Human Resource Development (HRD)

a. Training Conduct/Initiated:
Year Number Type/Kind No. of Benefited Fund Source
1 _________ ___________________________ ____________________ _______________
2 _________ ___________________________ ____________________ _______________
3 _________ ___________________________ ____________________ ________________

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 b. Training Attended/Participated:
Year Number Type/Kind No. of Benefited Fund Source
1 _________ ___________________________ ____________________ _______________
2 _________ ___________________________ ____________________ ________________
3 _________ ___________________________ ____________________ ________________

2. Other significant community activities undertaken:

D. RECOGNITION/CITATION AWARDS RECEIVED

Type of Award Awarding Inst./Co. Year Awarded

E. FUTURE PLANS ENVISIONED BY THE CLUB (Please specify, if any)

CERTIFIED CORRECT BY:

RIC PRESIDENT

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 Form 3. Evaluation Data Sheet

OUTSTANDING RURAL IMPROVEMENT CLUB

EVALUATION SCORE SHEET
INDICATORS MAX PT (%) POINTS DISTRIBUTION

1. ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT 40

a. Management Skills 8

b. Conduct of Meetings 10

c. Organizational Growth 8

d. Affiliation with other agencies 6

e. Club’s influence in the community 8

2. ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES/PERFORMANCE 35

a. Business Operations 10

b. Extent of Agribusiness Activities 15

c. Non-agricultural but economic activities 5

d. Financing/Repayment Performance 5

3. SOCIAL ACTIVITIES/COMMUNITY SERVICE 25

a. HRD for members & non-members 5

b. Provision of livelihood project for non- 5

members

c. Community involvement/service 15

TOTAL: 100%

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature over printed name)

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 Form 3. Evaluation Data Sheet

OUTSTANDING RURAL IMPROVEMENT CLUB

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT FORM
INDICATORS MAX PT (%) POINTS DISTRIBUTION

1. ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT 40

a. Management Skills 8

b. Conduct of Meetings 10

c. Organizational Growth 8

d. Affiliation with other agencies 6

e. Club’s influence in the community 8

2. ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES/PERFORMANCE 35

a. Business Operations 10

b. Extent of Agribusiness Activities 15

c. Non-agricultural but economic activities 5

d. Financing/Repayment Performance 5

3. SOCIAL ACTIVITIES/COMMUNITY SERVICE 25

a. HRD for members & non-members 5

b. Provision of livelihood project for non- 5

members

c. Community involvement/service 15

TOTAL: 100%

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature over printed name)

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

 Form 4. Comparative Assessment Form

OUTSTANDING RURAL IMPROVEMENT CLUB

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT FORM
INDICATORS MAX PT (%) POINTS DISTRIBUTION

1. ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT 40

a. Management Skills 8

b. Conduct of Meetings 10

c. Organizational Growth 8

d. Affiliation with other agencies 6

e. Club’s influence in the community 8

2. ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES/PERFORMANCE 35

a. Business Operations 10

b. Extent of Agribusiness Activities 15

c. Non-agricultural but economic activities 5

d. Financing/Repayment Performance 5

3. SOCIAL ACTIVITIES/COMMUNITY SERVICE 25

a. HRD for members & non-members 5

b. Provision of livelihood project for non- 5

members

c. Community involvement/service 15

TOTAL: 100%

Outstanding Rural Improvement Club

ANNEX 19. Small Farmer or
Fisherfolk Organization
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING SMALL FARMER/ FISHERFOLK ORGANIZATION

I. RATIONALE

Many farmers’ /fisherfolks’ organizations have been established, either with the assistance of
the Department of Agriculture or other concerned group or by the farmer’s /fisherfolks’
themselves. These organizations have continued to exist, delivering the appropriate services
in improving the quality of life of their members and the Filipino people, as a whole.

The Department of Agriculture recognizes the vital role of farmers’ /fisherfolks’ organization
and is therefore, implementing the Annual Search for the Outstanding Small Farmers’
/Fisherfolk’ Organization (OSFFO). The Search shall give due recognition to outstanding
SFFOs which have shown exemplary contributions in the total development of
farmers/fisherfolk and agriculture.

II. OBJECTIVES

A. General

1. To conduct annual search for Outstanding Small Farmers’/Fisherfolk’ Organization;

and
2. To come up with awardees who are beyond reproach.

B. Specific

1. To give recognition to SFFOs for their outstanding contributions in the upliftment of

the quality of life of the Filipino farmers/fisherfolk and in promoting agricultural
development;
2. To motivate other SFFOs to take more active involvement in government programs
and projects;
3. To encourage the establishment of more viable and sustainable farmers’/fisherfolk’
organization;
4. To emphasize the appropriate value system, particularly self-help leading toward
self-reliance; and
5. To highlight and inform the public on the vital role of SFFOs in farmers/fisherfolk and
agricultural development, to serve as a model for others to follow.

III. SCOPE

A. Definition

Small Farmers’/Fisherfolk’ Organization – refers to any group of small farmers/fisherfolk,

of Filipino nationality, whose major/principal activity is agricultural and fisheries
production, processing and marketing of crops, livestock and aquamarine products:

1. If engaged in crop production, members of the organization must be actually and

personally tilling an average area of not more than five (5) hectares;

2. If engaged in livestock production, the member of the organization must have an

average animal inventory not exceeding at anytime the following number of animal
units, to wit:

Outstanding Small Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 a. Poultry 1000 heads of layers
2000 heads of broilers
500 heads of ducks

b. Swine 10 sows
20 rower-fattener

c. Cattle 10 fattener

d. Dairy Cows 5 milking cows

e. Goats 50 heads

f. A combination of any of the aforementioned animal units.

3. If engaged in fisheries (Capture Fishing, Pond Agriculture and/or Sea Farming/Fish

Pen/Cage Operations);

a. Capture Fishing

The individual fisherfolk – members must be utilizing fishing boat of three (3)
tons or less and/or using gear not requiring the use of boat and fishing in
municipal waters;

b. Fish Culture

The member of the organization must be duly registered owners/lessees of

production units with an average of one (1) hectare with no individual member
operating more than three (3) hectares; or
The members must be fish/sea farmers by principal occupation of an average
area of one-half hectare (5,000 sq. meters), with no individual member
farming/operating more than one (1) hectare (10,000 sq. m.)

c. Category

There shall be only one (1) category for the Search for Outstanding Small
Farmers’/Fisherfolk’ Organization (OSFFO).

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

a. The SFFO must be a formal organization duly registered with CDA, SEC or any other
government agency/institution authorized to register;

b. The activities/projects of the SFFO must be in line with the thrusts of the Department of
Agriculture;

c. The SFFO must have been active/operational for at least two (2) consecutive years, prior
to the contest year;

Outstanding Small Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 d. The membership of the SFFO must be a Filipino Citizen for the past two consecutive years
prior to the contest year; and

e. Must have a good credit standing, if a loan borrower.

V. SEARCH RULES AND REGULATIONS

1. Nomination shall be made on the prescribed form by any individual who is a non-
Department of Agriculture employee, a civic organization or a farmer’s association;

2. Only qualified nominees as indicated in the qualifications in this category and with
complete scrap book and records of operations will be considered for evaluation;

3. A national winner shall not be eligible for nomination in the same category in the DA
Annual Search within five (5) years after winning the award;

4. The performance period of two (2) years preceding the start of the search will be covered
for evaluation.

5. Only one regional nominee or entry shall be properly endorsed by the region, and
considered for national evaluation;

6. The decision of the Board of Judges shall be final;

7. The national winner’s scrap book, video tape and other documents submitted for
evaluation shall become the property of the Department of Agriculture.

VI. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

The following documents shall be prepared and submitted by the nominated organization, to
wit:

1. Duly filled-up nomination form/information sheet

2. Recommendation from the following:

a. Town Mayor/Barangay Captain

b. Any Member of the Community/Organization Benefited

3. All Necessary Documents

a. Copies of Annual Report for the last two (2) years

b. Organization records for the last two (2) years

1) Audited Financial Statements for the last two (2) years;

2) List of Book of Accounts as prepared by the Accountant of the SFFO and duly
certified by the MAO and PAO;
3) Updated List of Members duly certified by the Secretary of the SFFO with the
following information:
- Name of Members
- Address
- Occupation
- If engage in crop production:

Outstanding Small Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 ▪ No. of hectares owned/tilled
▪ Type of crop planted

- If engage in livestock production:

▪ Type of animals
▪ No. of heads

- If engage in fisheries
▪ Capture fishing – specify number of tons of the boat used;
▪ Fish Culture – specify production units (hectarage) for pond aquaculture
and/or no. of hectares farmed and/or operated for sea farming/fish pen
operations

4) Records of collection of dues for the last two (2) years

5) Copies of the Minutes of Meeting/Attendance for the last two (2) years

- Board of Directors
- General Assembly
- Other Accomplishment /Services including Citations and Awards (copy/ies
of Certificate/s etc.) duly certified by the DA Regional Director)
- Certification from the lending institution/s on the SFFO’s Status of Loan
Repayments, as applicable;
- Certification from the SFFO’s Accountant on Loan Repayments of member-
borrowers to be supported with Aging of Receivable, as applicable; and
- Relevant photographs with captions.

6) Maximum five (5) minute videotape of the organization, its activities and other
relevant information.

Outstanding Small Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

VII. EVALUATION CRITERIA

PERCENT
INDICATORS DISTRIBUTIO
N
A. Organization Management (for the last two years ) 20
1. Membership 12
a. Active Members* = 4
Total Active Members, Year1 + Total Active Members, Year2
Total Members Total Members
2 x 4%

b. Membership Growth = 4
Number of new members:
Above 30 =4
21 to 30 =3
11 to 20 =2
1 to 10 =1
c. Total Membership =4
500 and above =4
100 to 499 =3
15 to 99 =2
* active members are those who:
▪ Attends GA
▪ Patronizes Coop. services
2. Frequency of Meetings for the last two (2) years - w/
accompanying copies or certification of minutes of meetings 6
held
a. Board of Director's regular meetings
Total # of regular meeting held Year1 + Total # of regular meeting held
Year2

Total # of meetings required Total # of meetings required

by the By-laws by the By-laws
2 x 2%
b. General Assembly Membership Regular Meeting = 4

▪ # of regular meetings held =2

- 2 GA (Year 1 & Year 2) =2
- 1 GA (Year 1 & Year 2) =1
▪ Attendance/ # of members present =2
Total # of members present Year1 + Total # of members present
Year2

Total # of members, Year 1 Total # of members, Year 2

2 x 2%

Outstanding Small Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 3. Affiliation/ Membership with other related agencies* 2

a. With 5 or more related agencies = 2

b. With 4 related agencies = 1.5
c. With 3 related agencies =1

*Affiliation with other agencies refers to the working relationship

between the SFFO and the GOs, NGOs, COs and other organization in
terms of financing, marketing trading, etc. supported by certificates of
membership

B. Economic Activities/ Performance (for the last two years ) 50

1. Business Operations

a. Book of Accounts* = 5
- Complete w/ annual report =5
- Complete audited FS but no annual =4
- Complete FS but not audited =3
- Complete and updated but not audited =2

b. Return on Investment (ROI)** = 10

- 12% and above = 10
- 6 to 11% =7.5
- below 6% but not negative =5

*The book of accounts refers to the standard books of original

entry and final entry including all subsidiary ledgers/records
appropriate to the SFFOs operations.

** Return on Investment (ROI) is a measure of Efficiency in the

management of resources, w/c include the capital outlay and
other funds, used in business operations. ROI is derived using this
formula:

Net Income
ROI= x
100
Members Equity + Total Liabilities
Where:
Member’s equity is paid-up share capital + donated capital
borrowing refers to loan payable only.

Outstanding Small Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 2. Level of Agribusiness Activities* (Coop / Members venture/s) 18

a. Crop production =2
▪ Coop venture =1
▪ Member

50% and above of members are engaged in crop production

=1
Less than 50% of members are engaged in crop production
= 0.5

b. Livestock/ Poultry =2
- Livestock =1
▪ Coop venture = 0.5
▪ Member

15% and above of members are engaged in livestock production

= 0.5

Less than 15% of members are engaged in livestock

Production = 0.25

- Poultry =1.0
▪ Coop venture = 0.5
▪ Member

15% and above of members are engaged in poultry

production = 0.5
Less than 15% of members are engaged in poultry
Production = 0.25

c. Fishery (Fish Culture/Capture) =2

▪ Coop venture = 1
▪ Member

20% and above of members are engaged in fishery

Production =1
Less than 20% of members are engaged in fishery
Production = 0.5

d. Pre/Post-harvest facilities =2

- A point equivalent to 0.5% shall be given for every pre/post

harvest facilities (i.e. tractor/ power tiller, thresher, Rice/corn
mill, sprayer, dryer, warehouse and truck) owned by the SFFO.
The maximum attainable point is 2%.

e. Food processing =2
- A point equivalent to 0.5% shall be given for every food
processing activity (i.e. meat, fish, fruit, etc.)
the SFFO is engaged in. Maximum attainable point is 2%.

Outstanding Small Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 f. Adoption of New Agri-fishery Technology = 3
- A point equivalent to 1.0% shall be given for every type of new
agri-fishery technology (i.e. organic farming, hybridization,
biotechnology, IPM, etc). The maximum attainable point is 3%.

g. Extension of loans =3
- A point equivalent to 0.5% shall be given for every type of
agricultural loan (i.e. crop production, livestock, poultry, fishery,
procurement/marketing, pre/post harvest equipment and food
processing) extended by the SFFO. The maximum attainable point
is 3%.

h. Procurement/ Marketing =2
- A point equivalent to 0.5% shall be given for every
procurement/marketing activity (i.e. farm inputs for crops, meat
and meat products, palay and grains, fish and fish products, feeds
and other chemicals, fishing paraphernalia) the SFFO is engaged
in. Maximum attainable point is 2%.

* Refers to the extent of integrated business activities' contribution to

the growth and viability of the SFFO.

3. Non – Agricultural Economic Activities (Coop Venture only) 5

- The SFFO must be engaged in at least three (3) non-agricultural

but economic activities (i.e extension of loan, small-scale
industries, consumer store, saving and or time deposit, canteen
operation, etc.) to earn a minimum equivalent point/rating of
2%. Every additional activity entitles the SFFO an additional
point/rating of 1%. The maximum attainable point/ rating is
5%.

4. Financing 12

a. Self-financed = 12
b. With outside financing
▪ Adequate equity 50% and above =8
▪ Below 50% =4
- Repayment Performance
- 90-100% repayment =4
- 75-89% repayment =3
- <75% =1

C. Social Activities / Accomplishments (for the last two years) 30

1. Human Resource Development 6

- Training conducted/sponsored by the SFFO*

(according to type of training)
=3

Outstanding Small Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 ▪ 5 and above =3
▪ 4 -5 =2
▪ 3 and below =1

* Attendance to training must be presented

- # of trainings attended by the SFFO members**

(conducted by others)
=3

▪ 6 and above =3
▪ 3 -5 =2
▪ 1 -2 =1

**Certificate of attendance must be presented

2. Other Services Rendered to Members (conducted by others) 6

The SFFO must have rendered at least three services such as medical,
dental, educational, mortuary, etc., to its members to earn the
minimum point/rating of 2%. Every additional service rendered by the
SFFO, merits a point of 1% increase of its score. The maximum
attainable point is 6%.
▪ 7 other services rendered =6
▪ 6 other services rendered =5
▪ 5 other services rendered =4
▪ 4 other services rendered =3
▪ 3 other services rendered =2

3. Community Involvement/Services 6

The SFFO must have rendered at least three services to the community
to earn the minimum point/rating of 1%. Every additional service
rendered by the SFFO, merits a point of 1% increase of its score. The
maximum attainable point is 6%.
▪ 8 services rendered =6
▪ 7 services rendered =5
▪ 6 services rendered =4
▪ 5 services rendered =3
▪ 4 services rendered =2
▪ 3 services rendered =1
4. Jobs Generated 6
The SFFO must have generated at least two jobs to the community to
earn the minimum point/rating of 1%. The maximum attainable
point is 6%.
▪ 31 and more jobs generated =6
▪ 20 to 30 jobs generated =5
▪ 15 to 19 jobs generated =4
▪ 10 to 14 jobs generated =3

Outstanding Small Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 ▪ 5 to 9 jobs generated =2
▪ 2 to 4 jobs generated =1

5. Awards/Recognition Received 6

The SFFO must have received at least two (2) awards/recognitions to

earn the minimum point/rating of 2%. Every additional
award/recognition received by the SFFO merits a point of 1% increase of
its score. The maximum attainable point/rating is 6%. (Note : National
awards shall be counted as 2 points)

▪ 6 or more awards/recognitions =6
▪ 5 awards/recognitions =5
▪ 4 awards/recognitions =4
▪ 3 awards/recognitions =3
▪ 2 awards/recognitions =2

TOTAL 100

Outstanding Small Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

ANNEX 20. Agricultural and
Fisheries Council
(P/HU/ICCAFC and
M/CAFC)
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING PROVINCIAL/HIGHLY URBANIZED CITY/ INDEPENDENT
COMPONENT CITY AND MUNICIPAL/CITY AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY COUNCIL
(P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

I. RATIONALE

The Philippine Council for Agriculture and Fisheries (PCAF), an attached agency of the
Department of Agriculture (DA), has established a network of private sector-led
organizations at the regional, provincial, city, and municipal levels called the
Agricultural and Fishery Councils (AFCs). The AFCs serve as the DA’s focal
consultative and feedback mechanism.

The AFCs are composed of:

1. Private sector organizations in agriculture and fisheries preferably involved in
more than one stage or phase of the value chain system. This includes groups of
farmers, fisherfolk, youth, women, businesses, and allied industries and services;

2. Individuals with expertise in agriculture and fishery including allied industries

and services provided that he/she is not a member of any organization already
represented in the council;

3. Concerned agencies from the government sector connected with agriculture and
fishery development which include, but not limited to, the Representatives of the
DA, its banner and other programs, and other local agricultural offices.
The DA recognizes the AFCs' important role in the development of the A&F sector,
thus, the Councils’ commitment and participation should be continually nurtured. An
approach for such nurturing is through motivational/recognition programs that
provide them recognition and incentives. The Gawad Saka Search for Outstanding
Provincial/Highly Urbanized City/Independent Component City/ and Municipal/City
Agricultural and Fishery Councils (P/HUC/ICCAFC and M/CAFC) is one of such
programs.

II. OBJECTIVES

The Gawad Saka Search aims to recognize outstanding AFCs by providing them
incentives and awards for their notable accomplishments.

Specifically, the search aims to:

1. Identify Provincial/Independent Component City/Highly Urbanized City &
Municipal/City AFCs that have demonstrated exemplary accomplishments in
performing their functions and fulfilling their mandates; and have accomplished
or implemented unique or innovative operational schemes to do these; and
2. Document the accomplishments and schemes of these AFCs and promote their
replication or adoption among the AFCs and other similar development-oriented
institutions.

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 III. SCOPE

The Gawad Saka Search for Outstanding Agricultural & Fishery Councils will be
conducted nationwide covering all PAFCs/ICCAFCs/HUCAFCs and MAFCs/CAFCs.

The Search covers all AFCs which have been organized and operational for at least
three (3) consecutive years. It must be recognized and endorsed by their respective
LGUs.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

1. Any individual who is a member of any civic organization or a farmers/fishers’

association and other government agencies that are not regular AFC members can
make a nomination by using the prescribed form (see PAFC/ICCAFC/HUCAFC &
MAFC/CAFC Form 1).

AFC members of the respective council as well as employees of the Department of

Agriculture’s Regional Field Offices, members of the
Regional/Provincial/Municipal/City Search Committees are not allowed to
nominate candidates.

2. Only qualified nominees with complete scrap books and records of operations will
be considered for evaluation.

3. A national winner for 3 consecutive years shall not be eligible for nomination in
the same category in the DA Annual Search within two (2) years after winning the
third award.

4. A performance period of two (2) calendar years preceding the start of the Search
will be covered for evaluation.

5. Only (1) regional winner or entry per category shall be officially endorsed by the
DA Regional Executive Director/RAFC Chairperson, and shall be considered for
national evaluation.

6. The decision of the Board of Judges shall be final and executory.

7. The national winner’s scrapbook, audiovisual presentations, and other

documented information submitted for evaluation shall become the property of
DA-PCAF.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

The following documents must be submitted together with the scrapbook:

1. Endorsement by the Local Chief Executive (LCE) and the PAFC Chairperson for
entries in the regional search, and the DA Regional Executive Director and RAFC
Chairperson for entries in the national search.

2. Duly filled out forms (Nomination and Evaluation forms).

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 3. Organization records (i.e. minutes of meetings, resolutions, accomplishment
reports, expenses, etc.) and other relevant information for at least two (2) years.
(i.e. January - December 2023 and January – December 2024).

4. Other accomplishments, citations, and awards of the Council and its members
(copies of certificate/s, etc. duly certified by the DA Regional Executive Director)

5. Notable accomplishments of the council and its members (at least 1-2 pages) with
photographs and captions showing the officers and members of the AFC and their
activities.

6. Updated AFC Profile

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Search will use a two-stage evaluation process. The first stage applies a common set
of criteria to all entries, identifying the top-performing Councils. In the second stage, a
different set of criteria will be used to assess only the shortlisted nominees.

The NTC will evaluate the Council's performance for each year (year one and year two)
separately. Then, they will average the scores from both years to determine the Council's
overall rating and ranking.

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

A. 1ST LEVEL CRITERIA (FOR REGIONAL NOMINEES)

CRITERIA POINT SYSTEM (Max of 100 points)

1. Conduct of executive, sectoral, and Maximum of Ten (10) points

special consultation meetings
PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC
Evidence:
● Minutes/Highlights of meetings
● Signed attendance sheet No. of meetings Points

>7 10

*6 8

5 6

4 4

<3 2

MAFC/CAFC

>5 10

*4 8

3 6

2 4

1 2

*annual target

2. Policy resolutions endorsed in 30 days Maximum of Ten (10) points

(for PAFC/ HUCAFC/ICCAFC) copy
furnished PCAF or Local Issues identified PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC
(for MAFC/CAFC); (endorsed in 30 days)
Evidence: No. of Policy Resolutions Points
● Copies of resolutions and
endorsement documents >5 10
● Copies of Matrix of local issues
● Highlights/Minutes of the Meeting 4 8

*3 6

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 2 4

1 2

MAFC/CAFC (endorsed in 30 days)

No. of Local Issues Identified Points

>5 10

4 8

3 6

2 4

1 2

*annual target

3. Adopted Policy Resolutions (for Maximum of Ten (10) points

PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC levels) / Local
Issues Resolved or Policy PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC
Resolutions/Recommendations Endorsed
(for MAFC/CAFC)
No. of Policy Resolutions Points
Adopted Resolutions - refers to Adopted
policy recommendations
> 5 10
/resolutions favorably endorsed by
the DA Secretary/Regional 4 8
Executive Director/Local Chief
Executive 3 6

Evidence (any of the following): 2 4

● Memorandum and Briefer approved
by the DA 1 2
● Copy of the response letter from the
concerned Agency
● Copy of the Program/Policy MAFC/CAFC
implemented by the concerned
agency
● Matrix of Local Issues Resolved No. of Local Issues Resolved or Points
● Endorsement Documents with a Policy Resolution/
copy of Resolutions/ Recommendation endorsed
Recommendations
>5 10

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 4 8

3 6

2 4

1 2

4. Conduct of/participation in monitoring Maximum of Fifteen (15) points

and validation activities such as:
a. Participation in the monitoring PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC
activities
b. Preparation of report
c. Conduct follow-through activities No. of M&E activities Points
(e.g. inclusion in the meeting
>9 15
agenda)
d. Agreement on actions to be taken 7-8 12
(as indicated in the HOM)
e. Action taken (e.g. coordination with 5-6 9
concerned agencies, etc
3-4 6

1-2 3
Evidence (any of the following):
● Monitoring Report
MAFC/CAFC
● Highlights of the Meeting
● Any proof that supports Monitoring
and Validation activities No. of M&E activities Points

Monitoring of implementation of DA >5 15

programs and projects
4 12

3 9

2 6

1 3

5. Membership Expansion Maximum of Five (5) points

Recruits - refers to number of PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC

private organization or individuals
with expertise recruited in the AFC
No. of recruits* Points

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

Evidence (any of the following): >5 5
● Council Resolution
● Approved Memorandum of 4 4
Membership Application
3 3

2 2

1 1

MAFC/CAFC

No. of recruits* Points

>3 5

2 3

1 1

* individual or organizations

6. Fund sourcing from DA-RFO, LGU, and Maximum of Fifteen (15) points
other sources to augment the AFC budget
in support to the operation of the Council PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC and MAFC/CAFC
Evidence (any of the following):
● Memorandum of Agreement Fund Source Points*
● Certificate of fund support
International fund sources 4
● Work and Financial Plan
outside DA
● Activity Proposal
● Accomplishment Report National fund sources outside 3
DA

Local fund sources outside DA 2

DA fund source only 1

* Cumulative and maximum of 10 points

PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC and MAFC/CAFC

* Additional Budget Points*

> 50% of allotted budget 5

< 50% of allotted budget 3

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 * Cumulative and maximum of 5 points

7. Capacity building conducted for and by Maximum of Ten (10) points

the council (non-PCAF funded or with
counterpart fund) PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC
Evidence (any of the following):
No of training conducted Points
a. Majority (at least 50%) of the council
>2 10
members trained:
● Documentation of activities, Copy of 1 5
request to and approval of the
concerned agency, Certificate (w/
request letter or invitation), Activity MAFC/CAFC
Report
No of training conducted Points
b. Representative (of the council
member/s) trained: >2 10
● Certificate (w/ request letter or
invitation), Highlights of the 1 5
meeting stating that the training
was re-echoed

8. Forging of partnership agreements with Maximum of Ten (10) points

allied groups to push advocacies and
expand the network initiated by the AFCs PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC
Partnership agreement - focused on
projects/activities related to community No. of PA forged Points
engagement, services, and advocacies
>3 10
Evidence: 2 7
● Copy of Partnership Agreements
Forged 1 5

MAFC/CAFC

No. of PA forged Points

>2 10

1 5

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

9. Membership/Participation in Local Maximum of Fifteen (15) points
Development Council (LDC) and other
similar groups PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC and MAFC/CAFC
Evidence (any of the following):
● Certification of Membership No. of membership Points
● Photos with narrative *
● Proof of Attendance
International or National 5
(e.g.:)

LDC/BEDC or other similar 3

groups (e.g.: PDC, LPPC)

Civic/Non 2
Government/People/Voluntar
y Organizations
* Cumulative and maximum of 10 points

PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC and MAFC/CAFC

No. of activities participated Points

*

International or National 2

LDC/BEDC or other similar 2

Civic/Non 1
Government/People/Voluntar
y Organizations
* Cumulative and maximum of 5 points

B. 2ND LEVEL CRITERIA (FOR SHORTLISTED NOMINEES)

CRITERIA CATEGORIES

1. Timeliness (submission of documents Maximum of Fifteen (15) points

on or before the set deadline and conduct
of consultation and monitoring activities PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC and MAFC/CAFC
as scheduled)

Means of verification: Documents Points

● Minutes/Highlights of meetings
before the set deadline 10
● Resolutions
● Monitoring Reports (30 working on the set deadline 8
days after the conduct of the
activity)

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 after the set deadline 5
* Cumulative and maximum of 10 points

PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC and MAFC/CAFC

Activities Points

on the set schedule 5

after the set schedule 2

* Cumulative and maximum of 5 points

2. Implementation of Policy Resolutions Maximum of Fifteen (15) points

Adopted or Local Issues Resolved
PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC
Means of verification:
● Ordinances
● Executive Orders No. of
● Provincial/Municipal Resolutions Implementations of Points
● Special Order with Accomplishment Policy Resolutions
Report adopted
● Guidelines
>7 15
● Memorandum Circulars, and the like
6 12

5 9

4 6

3 3

MAFC/CAFC

No. of Implementations of Local Points

Issues Resolved

>5 15

4 12

3 9

2 6

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 1 3

3. Citations and Awards of the Council and Maximum of Ten (10) points
its members representing the Council
PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC
Means of verification:
● Certificates
● Medals No. of citations and awards Points
● Plaques
International 4

National 3

Regional and local 3+

MAFC/CAFC

International 4

National 3

Regional and local 3

4. Interview Maximum of Sixty (60) points

4.a. Knowledge and Understanding (weighted per question)

4.b Impact and Results of Adopted

Policies and Issues Resolved (including
sustainability of the implemented
policy/project)

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 PAFC & MAFC/CAFC Form 1

NOMINATION FORM

OUTSTANDING PROVINCIAL/HIGHLY URBANIZED CITY/INDEPENDENT COMPONENT CITY

AND MUNICIPAL/CITY AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERY COUNCILS (PAFC/HUCAFC/ICCAFC &
MAFC/CAFC) OF THE YEAR

Name of the Council _________________________________________________________________

Province/Region _______________________________
Justification for Nomination:
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________

Nominated by:

_____________________________________________
Signature over printed name
Position: ___________________________________
Agency/Office: ____________________________

Endorsed by:

_____________________________________________
Signature over printed name
Position: ___________________________________
Agency/Office: ____________________________

PAFC & MAFC/CAFC Form 2

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 LIST OF POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS PASSED AND ADOPTED

Resolution Title of the Resolution Related Activities Status

No. conducted

Certified true and correct:

_____________________________________________
Signature over printed name
Position: ___________________________________
Agency/Office: ____________________________

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 PAFC & MAFC/CAFC Form 3

LIST OF MONITORING ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED

Date of Area of Monitoring Activity List of Projects Remarks/Status

Activity Activity Conducted Monitored

Certified true and correct:

_____________________________________________
Signature over printed name
Position: ___________________________________
Agency/Office: __________________________
 PAFC & MAFC/CAFC Form 4

LIST OF FUND SOURCES

Amount Funding Agency Related Activities conducted

Certified true and correct:

_____________________________________________
Signature over printed name
Position: ___________________________________
Agency/Office: ____________________________

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 PAFC & MAFC/CAFC Form 5

LIST OF TRAINING ATTENDED

Date of Title of Number of Participants Remarks/Status

Training Training

Certified true and correct:

_____________________________________________
Signature over printed name
Position: ___________________________________
Agency/Office: ____________________________

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 PAFC & MAFC/CAFC Form 6

LIST OF PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT FORGED

Date of Title of Partnership Partner Office Related Activities

Activity Agreement forged conducted

Certified true and correct:

_____________________________________________
Signature over printed name
Position: ___________________________________
Agency/Office: ____________________________

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 PAFC & MAFC/CAFC Form 7

LIST OF MEMBERSHIP/PARTICIPATION TO THE LDC AND

OTHER DEVELOPMENT GROUPS

Organization Related Activities Remarks/Status

Conducted/Participated

Certified true and correct:

_____________________________________________
Signature over printed name
Position: ___________________________________
Agency/Office: ____________________________

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

 PAFC & MAFC/CAFC Form 8

LIST OF AWARDS AND CITATIONS

Awardee Title of Awarding Body Related Activities

(Council or Award/Citation conducted
Individual)

Certified true and correct:

_____________________________________________
Signature over printed name
Position: ___________________________________
Agency/Office: ___________________________

Outstanding Agricultural and Fisheries Council (P/HU/ICCAFC and M/CAFC)

ANNEX 21. KADIWA Program
(Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING KADIWA PROGRAM
(AGRI-FISHERIES ENTERPRISE CATEGORY)

I. RATIONALE

The Department of Agriculture (DA), through its Three-Year Program to boost production,
envisions transforming the agriculture and fishery sector by implementing key strategies focused
on consolidation, modernization, industrialization, and professionalization. A vital component of
this transformation is improving postharvest, processing, logistics, and marketing support to
enhance supply chain efficiency, provide industry support services, and increase the capacity of
farmer and fisherfolk cooperatives, associations, and agri-fisheries enterprises in accessing and
linking to markets.

Central to this strategy is the KADIWA Inclusive Food Supply Chain Framework, which employs
a "Government-Private Sector-Community Partnership" approach. This framework provides
market-based interventions and capacity-building initiatives aimed at establishing a direct
market linkage between producers and consumers. The goal is to make food accessible to low-
income consumers at reasonable prices while empowering agri-fisheries enterprises to capture
a larger share of profits and achieve sustainable growth.

The KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program was developed as a direct producer-to-consumer food
supply and distribution system, offering an alternative to the traditional trader-dominated
marketing model. By minimizing marketing layers, KADIWA allows producers
(farmers/fisherfolk) to earn more from their produce, while consumers benefit from lower food
prices. The program also addresses key challenges faced by small farmers and fisherfolk in
accessing urban markets, particularly those within low-income communities, by creating
additional market opportunities and fostering price and supply stability.

Established through DA Memorandum No. 6, series of 2020, the KADIWA Program was
instrumental in helping communities access food commodities during the pandemic. Several
modalities of the program, including KADIWA on Wheels, KADIWA Retail Selling, KADIWA Online,
KADIWA Express, and e-KADIWA, were launched nationwide. These initiatives provided vital
market links between farmers, fisherfolk, and consumers, with NCR leading in terms of outlets,
operating 31 regular KADIWA pop-up stores and 6 permanent KADIWA retail stores.

With the recently signed Memorandum Circular No. 37, series of 2024, the transition to the KNP
Program has been formalized, accompanied by newly issued guidelines aimed at improving
program implementation and ensuring sustainability. This step underscores the DA’s
commitment to enhancing the KADIWA framework.

Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)

Components of the KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program

KADIWA Retail Selling Activities

The DA's Agribusiness and Marketing Assistance Service (AMAS) and Agribusiness and Marketing
Assistance Divisions (AMADs) have coordinated and facilitated over 2,882 KADIWA selling
activities (pop-up stores and KADIWA on Wheels) nationwide, with 280 permanent KADIWA
Stores now operating across the country.

Kadiwa ng Pangulo (KNP)

A special selling event stemming from the success of the Kadiwa ng Pasko in November and
December 2022, KNP was officially launched on February 27, 2023, in Cebu City. It was
institutionalized on July 23, 2023, through a Memorandum of Agreement signing in Pampanga.
This inter-agency initiative where the DA is the lead convenor is in collaboration with the
different national government agencies e.g. DILG, DOLE, DSWD, DTI, OP-PMS and PCO.

KADIWA Centers

Establishment of KADIWA Centers is part of the enhancements introduced to the KNP

program to address concerns on sustainability. In 2024, efforts have been refocused in setting up
permanent or semi-permanent structures to function as wholesale and retail marketplaces. The
operations and management of KADIWA Center shall be through the recognized partner
consolidators. Based on the latest issued guidelines KADIWA Centers shall sell Basic Necessities
and Prime Commodities (BNPCs) and serve as regular retail and wholesale markets. The first
KADIWA Center opened at the Bureau of Plant Industry (BPI) in May 2024, followed by the
opening of centers at the Philippine Fiber Industry Development Authority (PhilFIDA) and the
Bureau of Animal Industry (BAI).

Despite resource constraints and varying degrees of political support for agriculture, numerous
agribusiness enterprises and organizations have demonstrated unwavering commitment to the
KADIWA Program’s goals. Recognizing the outstanding contributions of agribusinesses and
fisherfolk enterprises in promoting direct farmer-to-consumer market linkages is crucial to
further motivating and encouraging their continued engagement and development.

The Gawad Saka Search for Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise
Category) is designed to acknowledge the significant role that agri-fisheries enterprises play in
the successful implementation of the KADIWA Program. By recognizing their contributions, the
award serves as a benchmark for best practices in sustainable rural development and food
security, highlighting the enterprises' vital collaboration with local governments, national
agencies, and their respective communities.

This guideline serves as a reference for the search, screening, validation, and determination of the
Outstanding Agri-Fisheries Enterprises implementing the KADIWA Program, celebrating their
best practices, achievements, and contributions to the agriculture and fisheries sector under the
framework of key national laws and policies.

Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)

 II. OBJECTIVES

The Gawad Saka Search for Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program (Agri-Fisheries
Enterprise Category) aims to honor exceptional agribusiness enterprises that have contributed
significantly to the development and implementation of the KNP Program. These enterprises have
shown outstanding performance in promoting the program’s goals of sustainable food security,
increased incomes for producers, and effective market access.

General Objective

This search aims to recognize and award outstanding agri-fisheries enterprises that have shown
exemplary performance and contributions to the successful implementation of the KNP Program
in their areas of operation.

Specific Objectives:

1. Recognize and reward distinguished KNP Program suppliers and partner implementers
for their active participation in KNP Program.
2. Promote success stories and best practices in the agro-industry and agribusiness sector.
3. Encourage more Agri-Fisheries Enterprises to participate and join the KNP Program.
4. Foster continuous improvement and excellence among agri-fishery enterprises by
adopting technologies and practices that improve productivity, safety, and sustainability.
5. Showcase innovations in agricultural product delivery, value-adding, and food safety
standards, contributing to economic growth, farmers’ income, and consumer welfare.

III. SCOPE

This search is open to all Agri-Fisheries Enterprise, with a focus on their outstanding
performance in the implementation of the KADIWA Program from 2022 to 2024. These entities
must have actively participated in and benefited from the KADIWA initiatives, contributing to
agricultural development and food security in their respective areas.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

a. Must be an existing supplier in different KADIWA Retail Selling activities (Kadiwa

ng Pangulo, KADIWA Center, KADIWA Store, KADIWA Pop-Up Store, KADIWA on
Wheels).
b. Must be registered in the Farmers and Fisherfolk Enterprise Development
Information System (FFEDIS) to ensure legitimacy and adherence to the
Department's standards.
c. Must be an active supplier which consistently participates in selling activities
ensuring accessibility of food.
d. Must have actively participated in a minimum of twenty-four (24) either in region
wide or in NCR KADIWA-related activities from 2022 to 2024.
e. Must actively support the Department of Agriculture's market linkage initiatives
and other programs, either by directly sourcing their products from farmers,
fisherfolk, or their members at fair and reasonable prices.

Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)

 f. Must ensure that the commodities they offer are sold lower than the prevailing
prices or the nearby market(s) and meet quality standards, such as delivering
fresh, high-quality products.
g. Must regularly submit updated sales reports to the Agribusiness and Marketing
Assistance Service (AMAS) or to respective Agribusiness and Marketing
Assistance Divisions (AMADs) to facilitate monitoring and program improvement.
h. Nominees must be officially endorsed by the Department of Agriculture's
Regional Field Offices (RFOs) or equivalent, ensuring that their performance
and contributions have been verified and recognized at the regional level.

V. SEARCH AND EVALUATION COMMITTEE

The search shall be conducted by the Agribusiness and Marketing Assistance Divisions (AMADs)
at a Regional Level with the AMADs identifying prospective outstanding Agri-Fishery Enterprise
nominees. The nominating AMADs then collect the information about the FFEs, assist them in
preparing the documentary requirements outlined in Section VI, and submit the nomination form
and other documentary requirements to the National Executive Committee.

The evaluation process begins at the Regional Level and ends at the National Level.

VI. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

● Endorsement letter from the Regional Field Offices (RFOs) to the National Executive
Committee.
● Nomination Forms:
● Form 1: Nomination Form.
● Form 2: Nominee Data Form.
● Documentation of Operations:
o Constitution and By-Laws: Certified copy of the association or cooperative's
constitution and by-laws.
o Registration Documents: Proof of registration with relevant government
agencies (e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission, Cooperative Development
Authority, Department of Labor and Employment, etc).
● KADIWA Implementation Records:
o Documentation of KADIWA selling activities conducted or participated,
including dates, locations, pictures, and sales reports.
● Financial Reports:
o Audited Financial Statements for the last two years (2022-2023), including
income statements and balance sheets.
● Employment Generated in the Locality:
o Employment List: A report showing all employees, their job roles and
employment status (full-time, part-time, seasonal).
o Payroll Records: Documents showing wages paid to employee for the past year.
o Business Permits and Certifications: Proof of compliance with employment
regulations, like DOLE or SSS registrations.
● Market Linkage Evidence:
o Documentation proving market linkages for their products, including agreements
or contracts with buyers, and records of sales (e.g. delivery receipts, sales
invoices, purchase orders, contracts).

Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)

 ● Community Impact Reports:
o Reports detailing the impact of their operations on local farmers and fisherfolk,
including testimonials and success stories.
● Organization Profile:
o Organizational Chart: Visual representation of the organizational structure.
● Farmer and Fisherfolk Registration:
o RSBSA - Registry System for Basic Sectors in Agriculture or
o FFEDIS - Farmers and Fisherfolk Enterprise Development Information System
● Additional Documentation:
o Video Presentation: A maximum 15-minute video showcasing the association or
cooperative KADIWA-related initiatives, including innovations, best practices,
and success stories.

VII. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The evaluation of nominees for the Gawad Saka Search for Outstanding KNP Program (Agri-
Fisheries Enterprise Category) will be based on the following criteria:

1. Social Relevance/Impact
○ Number of Participation in the KNP Program: Assess how frequently the Agri-
Fisheries Enterprise has actively participated in market-related activities in the
KNP Program.
○ Supply Sourcing from Farmers: Evaluate the extent to which the Agri-Fisheries
Enterprise sources its products directly from its members or other farmer groups,
supporting their livelihood and promoting local agriculture.
○ Employment Generated in the Locality: Measures the number of jobs created
by the Agri-Fisheries Enterprise in the community, enhancing local economic
development.
○ Savings to Consumers: Assesses the Agri-Enterprise role in providing affordable
agricultural products to consumers, either through lower prices or reducing
transport costs.
2. Project Operation
○ Number of Sites: Evaluate the number of KADIWA sites or selling locations in
which Agri-Fisheries Enterprise has established or participated.
○ Number of Participation: Tracks the Agri-Fisheries Enterprise's overall
involvement in KADIWA operations, including the number of events they have
participated in.
○ Frequency of Operation: Measures how often the Agri-Fisheries Enterprise
operates its KADIWA-related activities.
○ Number of Market/Institutional Buyers: Assesses the partnerships the Agri-
Enteprise has established with institutional buyers or markets.
○ Profitability: Evaluate the financial success of the Agri-Enterprise through its
KADIWA operations.
○ Employment Generation: Measures the direct impact of the Agri-Fisheries
Enterprise on job creation through its KADIWA-related activities.

Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)

Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING KADIWA AGRI-FISHERY ENTERPRISE

I. Nominee Information
Name of Farmer/ Fisherfolk/ :
Cooperative/Assn.
Address :

Province/Region :
Contact Person :
Contact Number :
E-mail Address :
Date of Establishment :
II. Nominated By
Name of Nominator :
Position/Designation :
Date of Establishment :
Organization :
Contact Number :
Justification for Nomination :

Nominator :
Signature Over Printed Name
Date :

Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)

In compliance with the Data Privacy Act of 2012 (EA No. 10173), the information provided in this form will be
used only for the purpose of Gawad Saka. The Department of Agriculture ensures the confidentiality and security
of your data, which is accessible only to authorized personnel.

Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)

Form 2. Nominee Data Form

OUTSTANDING KADIWA AGRI-FISHERIES ENTERPRISE

I. Basic Information
Name of Agri-Fisheries :
Enterprise
Address :

FFEDIS Number :
Type of Organization :
Date of Registration :
Total No. of Members :
II. Leadership and Management
Name of Chairperson :
Contact Number :
Name of Secretary :
Organization :
Contact Number :
III. Participation in KADIWA Program
Location of KADIWA Store :
No. of Participation :
Duration of Participation :
Products Sold :
IV. Market Linkage
List of Key Markets/Buyers :
:
:
:
List of Key Suppliers :
:
:
:
Describe the impact of your organization’s KADIWA participation on local farmers and fisherfolk:
(Include data or testimonials if available)

Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)

 V. Compliance and Reporting
Frequency of Reports :
Submitted to AMAS/AMADs

Compliance with KADIWA :

Pricing Regulations:
Additional Information (if any):
(Include any other relevant details or documentation that supports the nomination)

Name of Authorized :
Representative:
Signature :
Date :

In compliance with the Data Privacy Act of 2012 (EA No. 10173), the information provided in this form will be
used only for the purpose of Gawad Saka. The Department of Agriculture ensures the confidentiality and security
of your data, accessible only to authorized personnel.

Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

OUTSTANDING KADIWA PARTNER AGRI-FISHERIES ENTERPRISES

I. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The set of criteria in evaluating an Outstanding KADIWA Partner - Agri-Fisheries Enterprise

Category is divided into two (2) main parameters that capture the objectives of the Project
namely, a) Social Relevance/Impact, and b) Project Operation.

Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)

 Evaluation Criteria Maximum Explanations
Point Scores
Social Relevance/Impact 20 pts
1. Supply Sourcing from Farmers 10 pts

a. 10 and below farmers 3

b. 11-20 farmers 5
c. 21 -30 farmers 7
d. 31 and above farmers 10
2. Employment generated in the locality 5 pts

a. 3-10 persons 1
b. 11-20 persons 3
c. Above 21 persons 5
Direct employees with benefits i.e. SSS and Additional 2
Philhealth – for Non-LGU personnel points

3. Savings to consumers in terms of 5 pts

transport cost and/or low price
received
a. transport only 1
b. price only 3
c. transport and price 5
Project Operation 80 pts
4. Number of Sites 20 pts
a. 5 and below 5
b. 6- 10 10
c. 11-15 15
d. 16 and above 20
5. Number of Participation 15 pts
a. 24 - 30 6
b. 31-40 9
c. 41-60 12
d. 61 and above 15
6. Frequency of Operation 15 pts
a. 4 days a month 6
b. 8 days a month 9
c. 12 days a month 12
d. 13 days a month and above 15
7. Number of Market/ Institutional Buyers 15 pts
a. 5 and below 6
b. 6-10 9
c. 11-15 12
d. 16 and above 15
8. Profitability (ROI) 10 pts

Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)

 a. below 1% 3
b. >1% - 5% 5
c. >5% - 10% 7
d. Above 10%
10
9. Number of KADIWA Partners 5pts
None 0
NGOs 3
Private Institution(s) 3
Both NGOs and Private Institutions 5
TOTAL
BONUS POINTS 10 pt
Operation of a KADIWA Store/Center
8
Conduct of Community Pantry 2

Outstanding KADIWA Program (Agri-Fisheries Enterprise)

ANNEX 22. KADIWA ng
Pangulo (KNP) Program
Implementer
(LGU)
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING CITY/MUNICIPAL FISHERIES AND AQUATIC RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT COUNCIL (FARMC)

I. RATIONALE

The DA through its Three-Year Program to boost production envisions transforming the agriculture
and fishery sector by implementing key strategies toward a modern and industrialized Philippine
agriculture through consolidation, modernization, industrialization, and professionalization. One of
the key strategies identified is the improvement of the postharvest, processing, logistics, and
marketing support which focuses on improving supply chain efficiency, providing industry support
services, and increasing capacities of farmers and fisherfolk cooperatives and associations in
accessing and linking to the markets.
The implementation of this strategy will follow the KADIWA Inclusive Food Supply Chain
Framework which adopts a “Government-Private Sector-Community Partnership” approach. This
entails providing interventions that are market-based and capacity enhancement interventions
geared towards achieving an inclusive food supply chain facilitating direct market linkage of
producers to consumers thereby making food accessible to low-income consumers at reasonable
prices.
The KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program is a “direct” producer-to-consumer food supply and
distribution program facilitating the linkage of farmers to profitable markets. Before the onset of the
pandemic, the KADIWA ni Ani at Kita Project was initiated to ensure a steady supply of food directly
to the market. The KADIWA proved to be beneficial to small farmers/ producers in rural areas and
consumers in urban areas/ cities as the farmers get higher prices and profits from their produce
while the consumers have an available supply of safe food at affordable prices.

The KNP Program was established to make quality agri-fishery commodities such as rice, fish, poultry
& livestock products, fruits & vegetables, and other basic commodities accessible to the urban poor
and their families at affordable prices. While establishing an additional market for agri-fishery
stakeholders to increase their incomes and ensure the price and supply stability of food and other
commodities within the urban-poor areas.

The DA issued Memorandum Circular No. 37 Series of 2024, making KNP a banner program
implemented nationwide providing “bigger, better, and more” features and adopting a whole-of-
government approach. The Agribusiness and Marketing Assistance Service (AMAS) spearheads the
facilitation of the KNP Program with the support of the Bureaus, Attached Agencies and Corporations,
Regional Field Offices (RFOs), and Banner programs through their respective programs, projects, and
activities.

The KNP Program aims to: a) provide an alternative market for consumers that provides accessible
and available quality necessities and prime commodities at affordable prices to the consumers;
b) establish and sustain additional markets for small farmers and fisherfolk's produce/catch and

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

local enterprises’ products hereby increasing their respective incomes; and c) institutionalize the
producer-to-consumer direct linkage to establish a market-driven approach to production.
KNP Program implements the following modalities:

1. KADIWA Centers

KADIWA Center is a wholesale and retail marketplace recognized by DA, that has a permanent or
semi-permanent structure and a regular schedule. This facility sells Basic Necessities and Prime
Commodities (BNPCs) and operates at a wholesale and/ or retail level. The KADIWA Center shall be
operated by the recognized KADIWA Center Consolidator.

The 1st KADIWA Center opened on May 16, 2024, at the Bureau of Plant Industry (BPI) in San Andres,
Manila followed by the Philippine Fiber Industry Development Authority (PhilFIDA) on May 17,
2024, in Las Piñas City. The next two (2) Kadiwa Centers are at the Bureau of Animal Industry (BAI)
in Visayas Avenue, Quezon City, and at Barangay Minuyan, San Jose del Monte, Bulacan.

2. KADIWA Store

KADIWA Store is a marketplace that may have a physical structure or temporary space to sell
BNPCs in retail. This includes pop-up stores, bazaars, and on-wheel selling activities to respond to
the requests of the consuming public.

At present, there are 280 KADIWA stores operating nationwide. In addition, about 120 KADIWA pop-
up stores and 31 KADIWA On-wheels are also being operated.

Despite challenges such as resource constraints, governance issues, and varying levels of political
support for agriculture, the commitment of LGUs to the goals of the KADIWA Program remains
steadfast. Recognizing the achievements of provincial, city, and municipal LGUs honors their hard
work and success while motivating continuous improvement and prioritization of the AF sector.

The Gawad Saka Search for Outstanding KADIWA Implementer - LGU Category is designed to
recognize the vital contributions of LGUs in KADIWA Program implementation thereby contributing
to the upliftment of the lives of various constituents in the agriculture and fisheries sector. This award
highlights the importance of LGUs' role and their collaboration with national agencies, local
stakeholders, and communities to achieve sustainable rural development and food security
specifically in the implementation of the KADIWA Program. By incentivizing LGUs to prioritize
agricultural initiatives, the award aims to inspire a collective commitment to implement a direct
farmers-to-consumer supply chain approach to foster economic growth across the country.

These guidelines serve as a reference for the search, screening, validation, and determination of
outstanding LGU - KADIWA Implementers whether at the provincial, city, or municipal levels,
celebrating their best practices, achievements, and contributions to the agriculture and fisheries
sector under the framework of key national laws and policies.

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

 II. OBJECTIVES

1. To recognize the exceptional contributions and interventions of the LGUs in the implementation of
the KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program in their area in support of food security and food availability;

2. To document success stories and best practices of LGU Implementers and provide role models for
other LGUs to emulate; and

3. Institutionalize a mechanism that recognizes local governments for their significant contributions
to the implementation of marketing programs, eventually contributing to increased income for
farmers and reasonable/affordable prices to consumers.

III. SCOPE

The Gawad Saka Search is open to all Local Government Units (Provinces, Municipalities, and Cities)
that have supported, participated, and implemented the different KADIWA modalities starting from
its inception in 2020 and are actively participating for at least two (2) years during the rating period.

For this Search, the following definitions shall apply:

LGU Implementer – refers to a city, municipality, or province that participates in the KNP Program
through the conduct or facilitation of KADIWA selling activities through KADIWA store, pop-up store,
On-wheels, and KADIWA ng Pangulo activities.

KADIWA Store – a marketplace that may have a physical structure or temporary space to sell Basic
Necessities and Prime Commodities (BNPCs) in retail. Selling is managed by the identified KNP
Program Consolidator or Supplier.

KADIWA Pop-Up Store – a temporary store that operates on a per-schedule basis to respond to the
consuming public.

KADIWA On-Wheels – Using the KADIWA On-Wheels truck, agri-fishery products are made
available and more accessible to low-income communities in urban areas. Through the roving
vehicle, selling activity may be done at multiple sites in one day.

KADIWA ng Pangulo - is an existing project and a special retail selling event organized and
participated jointly by DA and the different national agencies and offices such as the Department of
the Interior and Local Government (DILG), Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Department of
Labor and Employment (DOLE), Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD),
Presidential Management Staff (PMS) and the Presidential Communications Office (PCO). The
KADIWA Ng Pangulo is implemented through a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed on July
17, 2023. Its distinct feature is that DILG supervises the identification of sites and the respective

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

 beneficiaries of DA, DTI, DOLE, DSWD, and DILG are allowed to sell directly to consumers during the
selling activity.

Agri-fishery commodities – shall cover agricultural and fishery products harvested or gathered
from agricultural areas or bodies of water used for aquaculture (AFMA, 1997). The basic food
commodities to be sold in KADIWA shall consist of, but are not limited to, fish, chicken, meat,
vegetables, fruits, and other necessities and prime commodities.

IV. SEARCH RULES AND REGULATIONS

The following shall be the rules and regulations governing the search:

a. Only qualified nominees, as defined in Section III (Scope) and Section V (Qualification of
Nominee), and those with complete scrapbook and videotape (3-5 minutes) showing the
KADIWA operation, shall be evaluated during the search.

b. The rating period covered for evaluation is the one year of operation preceding the
search.

c. Only one regional nominee per region shall be considered for national evaluation by the
NTC.

d. Out of the regional nominees, the NTC shall choose three (3) finalists for presentation to
the NEC.

e. There can be no winners based on the recommendation of the NEC/NTC and decision of
the BOJ;

f. The Board of Judges shall select the national winner for the Outstanding KNP Program
Implemented LGU Category

g. The decision of the Board of Judges shall be final.

h. The national winner’s scrapbook, videotape, and other documents submitted for
evaluation shall become the property of the Department of Agriculture.

i. A national winner shall not be eligible for nomination in the same category in the DA
Annual Search within five (5) years after winning the award.

j. A regional winner shall not be eligible for nomination in the same category in the DA
Annual Search within two (2) years after winning the award.

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

V. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

To qualify for the Search, the following qualifications should be met:

a. Must have at least two (2) years of KNP Program implementation facilitating the conduct
of the different KADIWA modalities; and
b. Must be endorsed by the region for the national search.

VI. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

Endorsement of the Regional Search Committee to the National Executive Committee;

Form 1. Nomination Form;
Form 2. Nominee Data Form;

The nominee’s Scrapbook shall contain the following documents:

1. Table of contents
2. Nomination form duly filled up by the nominating officer
3. Profile of the City/Municipality/Province
4. List of KNP Personnel or Management Staff
5. Description of KNP operations (per modality) during the rating period
(commodities sold including volume, sources of supply including frequency of
delivery, market outlets, catchment areas, capitalization, means of transportation,
distance to the nearest market, market linkages established with suppliers and
consumers, marketing strategies, value-adding activities, utilization and
maintenance of equipment, food safety, waste management, impact to the
community, savings to consumers, etc.)
6. Financial statement of operation during the rating period
7. Sustainability Plan
8. Attachments
i. List of suppliers (specify name) per commodity including production
area/cultivated area, frequency of delivery or purchase & total volume
purchased during the rating period
ii. List of market outlets (specify name) per commodity including frequency of
delivery or sale and total volume sold during the rating period
iii. Monthly average comparative prices in the KADIWA and in nearby markets per
commodity during the rating period
iv. Monthly record of sales per commodity (separate sales from agriculture and
fishery commodities and non-agricultural commodities) during the rating
period
v. Reports on other activities or support of the LGU related to the KADIWA
operations

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

 b. Supporting Documents:
1. MOA between DA & LGU or Certified Copy of LGU Ordinances/Resolutions and
other legal or supporting documents indicating the LGUs programs and activities
related to the implementation of KADIWA such as, but not limited to, provision
of production support to farmers/fisherfolk, direct procurement from
farmers/fisherfolk or FCAs, transportation support, etc.
2. Certified copy of the KNP Monthly Accomplishment Report (Physical and
Financial) for the year during the search period
3. Certified copy of the KNP Sustainability Plan/Food Security Plan
4. Appropriation Ordinance/ Annual Investment Plan (if any)
5. Latest pictures of the KADIWA operations
6. Picture of the whole KADIWA Management Team
7. Videotape - documentation of its operation

VII. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION

The set of criteria in evaluating an Outstanding KADIWA NG PANGULO PROGRAM IMPLEMENTER-

LGU CATEGORY was divided into two (2) main parameters that capture the objectives of the Project
namely, a) Social Relevance/Impact, and b) Project Operation.

The weight of each criterion is presented hereunder:

Evaluation Criteria Maximum Point Scores EXPLANATIONS

Social Relevance/Impact 45%
1. Linkage to and 20 (%) Should take into account the
Participation of number of farmers inc. backyard
producers/members of groups who
Farmers/Fishers/
are directly supplying or selling in
Groups the KADIWA.
a. 15 farmers and 8
below 15
b. 16-30 farmers 20
c. Above 30 farmers

2. Employment 10 % Includes both direct & indirect

generated in the employment generated by the
project for the community.
locality
Employment is generated if a
a. 3-10 persons person earned income by
(6)6 participating in the project i.e.
b. 11-20 persons KADIWA staff/personnel, sales
c. Above 20 persons (8)7
agent/ambulant vendors and
supplier of processed products to

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

 Evaluation Criteria Maximum Point Scores EXPLANATIONS
Direct employees with (10)8 the KADIWA, provided that the
benefits i.e. SSS and processing activity was undertaken
Philhealth – for Non-LGU Additional because of the KADIWA project.
personnel 2 points
3. Savings to the 15 (%)
consumer in terms
of transport cost
and/or low price
received

12
a. transport only 12
b. price only 15
c. transport and
price
Project Operation 55%
3. Number of KNP This will be measured using the
modalities 15 submitted Monthly Physical
conducted in the Accomplishment Report. It should
municipality/ take into account the
city/province per implementation or conduct of all
month KNP Program modalities.

a, 5 and below 5
10
b. 6 to 10
15
c. Above 10

5. Adherence to 10 This refers to how the LGU handles

standards for selling the food items being sold in the
fresh agri-fishery KADIWA i.e. if it conforms with the
products
“Code of hygienic practice for the
sale of fresh agriculture
and fishery products in markets
and authorized outlets” (PNS
46:2006)
6. Innovation/strategy 10 This includes any activity/strategy
undertaken or will be undertaken
by the LGU to improve KADIWA
operations i.e. regularity of

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

 Evaluation Criteria Maximum Point Scores EXPLANATIONS
operation, expanding area covered,
market/product promotion,
processing/ value-adding
activities, sources of capitalization,
projects received from agencies
other than DA, etc.

The score will be taken from the

result of the ratings in the attached
checklist.
7. Service to the 10 This refers to the activities of LGU
Community in support to the community and in
taking care of the environment.
This includes production support,
logistics support, direct
procurement, etc.
8. Sustainability 10 This refers to the future plans of
the LGU to continue and
institutionalize the Program. The
means of verification could include
program documents, budget
provision through Appropriation
Ordinance/Annual Investment
Plan, construction of a permanent
structure, etc.
TOTAL 100

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

VIII. APPENDICES

Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING KADIWA IMPLEMENTER LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT

Name of the LGU :

Address :

Province/Region :
Justification for Nomination :

Nominated by :
Signature Over Printed Name (Chair of the
Provincial/Municipal/City Agriculture and Fishery
Council)
Position :
Address :

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

Form 2. Nominee Data Form

OUTSTANDING KADIWA IMPLEMENTER LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT

I. Brief Profile of the Province/Municipality/City

1. Name of the LGU :

2. Address :
3.
4. Number of KADIWA Centers :
5. Number of KADIWA Stores

6. Number of KADIWA Pop-up Stores :

7. Number of LGU - Personnel Assigned for
KADIWA :
● Plantilla Positions
● Casual Positions (including Job Orders
/ Contractual)
● Total
8. Number of registered Farmers and
Fisherfolk in RSBSA, NCFRS, FishR :
● RSBSA
● NCFRS
● FishR
● Total
9. Total number of Farmers and Fisherfolk
Organizations engaged by LGU in the direct
procurement of goods/commodities :
10. List Commodities :
_____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________
__________________________________________ _____________________________________

11. KADIWA ng Pangulo Operations initiated by the LGU for the last two (3) years.

YEAR 1 (2022)

TYPE Address / Location Date(s)

KNP

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

 KADIWA Store

Pop-Up Store (with regular

schedule)

Pop-Up Store (no regular

schedule)

KADIWA On Wheels

YEAR 2 (2023)

TYPE Address / Location Date(s)

KNP

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

 KADIWA Store

Pop-Up Store (with regular

schedule)

Pop-Up Store (no regular

schedule)

KADIWA On Wheels

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

 YEAR 3 (2024)
TYPE Address / Location Date(s)

KNP

KADIWA Store

Pop-Up Store (with regular

schedule)

Pop-Up Store (no regular

schedule)

KADIWA On Wheels

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

 12. List of Farmers and Fisherfolk Organizations and the amount of transactions engaged by
the LGU in the direct procurement of goods under the Sagip Saka Law for the last two (2)
years.

YEAR 2 (2023)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

YEAR 3 (2024)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

Form 3. Evaluations Score Sheet

I. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The set of criteria in evaluating an Outstanding KADIWA Implementer - LGU Category is

divided into two (2) main parameters that capture the objectives of the KNP Program
namely, a) Social Relevance/Impact, and b) Project Operation.

Evaluation Criteria Maximum Point Scores EXPLANATIONS

Social Relevance/Impact 45%
4. Linkage to and 20 (%) Should take into account the
Participation of number of farmers inc. backyard
producers/members of groups who
Farmers/Fishers/Gro
are directly supplying or selling in
ups the KADIWA.
d.15 farmers and 8
below 15
e. 16-30 farmers 20
f. Above 30 farmers
5. Employment 10 % Includes both direct & indirect
generated in the employment generated by the
project for the community.
locality
Employment is generated if a
d. 3-10 persons person earned income by
e. 11-20 persons (6)6 participating in the project i.e.
f. Above 20 persons KADIWA staff/personnel, sales
(8)7
agent/ambulant vendors and
Direct employees with benefits
i.e. SSS and Philhealth – for (10)8 supplier of processed products to
Non-LGU personnel the KADIWA, provided that the
Additional 2 processing activity was undertaken
points because of the KADIWA project.
3. Savings to consumer 15 (%)
in terms of transport
cost and/or low price
received

12
d. transport only 12
e. price only 15
f. transport and price
Project Operation 55%
6. Number of KNP This will be measured using the
modalities conducted submitted Monthly Physical
in the municipality/ 15 Accomplishment Report. It should
city/province per take into account implementation or
month conduct of all KNP Program
modalities.

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

 a. 5 and below 5
b. 6 to 10
10
c. Above 10
15

9. Adherence to 10 This refers to the manner on how

standards on selling the LGU handle the food items being
fresh agri-fishery sold in the KADIWA i.e. if it
products
conforms with the “Code of hygienic
practice for the sale of fresh
agriculture
and fishery products in markets and
authorized outlets” (PNS 46:2006)
10. Innovation/strategy 10 This include any activity/strategy
undertaken or will be undertaken
by the LGUto improve KADIWA
operations i.e. regularity of
operation, expanding area covered,
market/product promotion,
processing/ value-adding activities,
sources of capitalization, projects
received from agencies other than
DA, etc

Score will be taken from the result

of the ratings in the attached
checklist.
11. Service to the 10 This refers to the activities of LGU in
Community support to the community and in
taking care of the environment. This
include production support,
logistics support, direct
procurement, etc
12. Sustainability 10 This refers to the future plans of the
LGU to continue and institutionalize
the Program. The means of
verification could include program
document, budget provision
through Appropriation
Ordinance/Annual Investment Plan,
construction of permanent
structure, etc
TOTAL 100

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

Adherence to Standards in Selling Fresh Agri-Fishery Products (PNS 46:2006) including
food safety and sanitation (10%)

ITEMS Maximum SCORE

Point

1. Utensils, table surfaces, cutting knives, water 1 pt.

outlets/faucets, and other equipment are in good
condition and properly maintained.

2. Packaging or wrapping materials should be free from 1 pt.

any form of impurities or contaminants, without
defects or pinholes. Printed packaging materials like
newspapers must not be used.

3. Water for general purposes (washing inputs and 1 pt.

recipients) should be potable and where possible
chlorinated. Water used should be obtained from
approved sources, free from impurities or foreign
matters.

4. Cold storage rooms/freezers shall be kept clean, free 1 pt.

from objectionable odor, and in good condition

5. Fresh agriculture and fisheries products shall be 1 pt.

displayed/sold on tables, shelves, boxes, and storage
space that is smooth and made of non-contaminating
material, clean and protected from direct sunlight, dust,
fumes, and other contaminating agents like pests
(insects, rodents) and other biological agents.

6. Fresh agriculture and fisheries products shall be kept or 1 pt.

stored separately in areas from non-edible products
like soap, disinfectants, pesticides, and other toxic or
poisonous substances.

7. Use of color-enhancing lights, mats, and other materials 1 pt.

to deceive the consumers as to freshness is not being
practiced.

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

 8. Flies and other pests or vermin should be controlled. 1 pt.

9. Waste bins (containers) should be kept far from the 1 pt.

handling area and have a lid and, where possible,
should be fitted with an automatic closing device. When
collecting solid wastes, recyclable and non-recyclable
materials should be kept separate. Their final
destination should be according to provincial, city, or
municipal regulations.

10. Handlers/vendors should practice hygienic handling of 1 pt.

products/commodities.

Innovation/Strategy (10)

ITEMS Maximum SCORE

Points
(Consider the use of eco bags, etc.)

1. Forward Integration (e.g. satellite KADIWA, catering 2

services, and other business arms, linkage to
processors and/or institutional buyers, etc.)

2. Undertakes value-adding/processing activities. 2

3. Regularly operating 6-7 days a week 2

4. Undertakes promotional activities. 2

5. Attendance to training, seminar, and workshop. 2

(includes regular meetings of the management team)

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

Service to the Community (5%)

ITEMS Maximum Points SCORE

1. Participates/Supports sustainable environment 2 pts.

activities (i.e. use recyclable packaging materials
that adhere to food safety law, etc.)

2. Support to local government programs (e.g. feeding 2 pts.

programs, scholarships, etc.)

3. The KADIWA participates in community activities 1 pt.

(e.g. clean-up drive)

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

SAMPLE MATRIX FOR LGU DIRECT PROCUREMENT WITH FARMERS / FCAs

List of KADIWA Suppliers (per month)

For the Month of ____________ 2024

Name of Type of Commodit Average Frequency of Total

Supplier Supplier y Supplied Volume per Delivery Volume
Delivery (Kilos)
(kilos)

Example:

Juan dela Cruz Farmer Banana 100 Twice a week 800

Ok K B. Chan Trader Calamansi 75 Twice a week 700

Susan Backyard 20 Once a week 80

Magalang grower Vegetables

Jim’s Meat Wholesaler Pork 100 Every other 1,600

Shop (Public day
Market)

Jim’s Meat Wholesaler Chicken 100 everyday 3,000

Shop (Public
Market)

Guran Fish Fishpond Fish 200 Everyday 6,000

Farm owner

TOTAL 12,800

Outstanding KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Program Implementer (LGU)

ANNEX 23. City/Municipal
FARMC
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING CITY/MUNICIPAL FISHERIES AND AQUATIC
RESOURCES MANAGEMENT COUNCIL (FARMC)

I. RATIONALE

One of the milestone institutional provisions of the New Fisheries Code of 1998
or Republic Act 8550 as amended by Republic Act 10654 is the full
implementation of the Department of Agriculture (DA) through the Bureau of
Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) and the creation of Fisheries and
Aquatic Resources Management Councils (FARMCs).

FARMCs are organized at the Municipal/City, Integrated and National Levels

and serve as an advisory and recommendatory body to the Local Government
Unit (LGU), BFAR, DA and other relevant government institutions, in matters
concerning conservation and management of fisheries and aquatic resources.
The LGU may create the Barangay Fisheries and Aquatic Resources
Management Councils (BFARMCs) and Lakewide Fisheries and Aquatic
Resources Management Councils (LFARMCs) whenever necessary. Such
BFARMC and LFARMCs shall serve in an advisory capacity to the
aforementioned agencies.

At the Municipal/City Level, the FARMCs are composed of members from the
stakeholders such as the fisherfolks, youth and women in fisheries, non-
government organizations, the private sectors and key members of the LGU
concerned in the planning, policy-making and implementation of projects and
programs on fisheries and aquatic resources conservation and management.

FARMCs also actively participate and assist in the implementation of various

government programs and projects in fisheries and serve as a venue for
consensus building among the various stakeholders, both in the marine and
freshwater ecosystems. The FARMC is a powerful tool for participatory
management, promotes empowerment particularly among the marginalized
fisherfolks, and encourages cooperation and compliance of various fisheries
laws and regulations. The FARMC serves as consultative forum on various
issues, concerns and opportunities in the fisheries sector. Their
recommendations serve as valuable inputs to the planning processes for
programs that are geared towards increased fisheries production and
sustainable development.

Considering the important role of the FARMCs in fisheries conservation and

management activities for food sufficiency, this participatory management
tool must be continually promoted and sustained. One such approach is to
provide them with continuing incentives such as recognition of their valuable
contributions. Thus, the Gawad Saka Search for Outstanding Municipal/City
Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council (M/CFARMC) is
created.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 II. OBJECTIVES

This aims to recognize its outstanding contributions to sustainable fisheries

development.

Specifically, this Search aims to:

1. To identify M/CFARMCs to:
a. Have exemplary accomplishment in the performance of their
functions and have achieved their mandates in the Fisheries Code
(RA 8550) as amended by RA 10654.
b. Have accomplished/implemented outstanding or innovative
operational schemes to realize their mandates.

2. To document the best practices and strategies of these FARMCs and

promote their replications or adoptions among other FARMCs.

3. To encourage other FARMCs to:

a. Uphold FARMC standards for nationwide implementation.
b. Promote awareness on conservation, management and sustainable
development of the municipal waters.
c. Encourage active participation on the implementation of the
amended Fisheries Code (RA 10654) and the FARMCs (FAO 196).
d. Enhance partnership and coordination among LGUs, other line
agencies and the fishing communities in the management of
fisheries and coastal resources.
e. Explore ways to improve performance of FARMCs as an effective
and efficiency advisory and recommendatory body to LGUs and
other agencies.

4. To monitor the sustainability of the previously identified FARMCs

national winners.

III. SCOPE

This search provides national awards for City FARMC and Municipal FARMC
which has successfully demonstrated exemplary performance in the fisheries
and aquatic resource management of the local government units. This category
excludes other councils like the integrated fisheries and aquatic management
councils (IFARMCs), bay fisheries and aquatic resource management councils
(BFARMCs) and lakewide fisheries and aquatic management councils
(LFARMCs). It is spearheaded by the Department of Agriculture through the
Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources-FARMC Program Management
Center, in partnership with Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Department of the Interior and Local Government, League of Cities
of the Philippines, League of Municipalities of the Philippines and the National
Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

1. All M/CFARMCs that have been operational for at least three (3) years
may be nominated from the time it was organized with its duly elected
officers.
2. Period of evaluation shall be the FARMC’s performance for the past
three (3) years.
3. Nomination must be done through or by the Office of the Municipal/City
Mayor of the municipal/city government.
4. Nomination forms shall be distributed by the BFAR.
5. Deadline for submission of nominations shall be announced by the
BFAR.
6. There shall only be one national winner for outstanding M/CFARMC.
7. A National Technical Committee (NTC) shall be convened and shall
undertake a two-stage evaluation of nominations. The NTC shall be
composed of representatives from the following agencies, duly
recommended by their respective agency heads for the purpose:

a. DA – BFAR
b. National Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management
Council (NFARMC)
c. Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG)
d. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)
e. League of Municipalities of the Philippines (LMP)
f. League of Cities of the Philippines (LCP)

The first stage is done through submission of all regional nominees.

The NTC shall conduct a desk evaluation and shall come up with the
five finalists.

8. The NTC shall agree if they decide to do field validation for more than
five finalists as needed.

The second stage will be the field validation and evaluation of the five
finalists.

9. The decision of the NTC is final and irrevocable.

10. A previous national winner can compete in this category only after five
(5) years.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

A. FARMC Documentation

The FARMC Documentation shall be prepared by the nominated

M/CFARMC to be assisted by the fisheries personnel of the Office of the

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 Municipal/City Agriculturist. The Municipal/City Agriculturist shall attest
to the veracity and completeness of the information in the selection of best
in documentation
The Documentation shall contain the following:

1. Title Page
2. Certification by the Municipal/City Agriculturist attesting the
veracity and completeness of the information contained in the
Documentation.
3. Table of Content
4. Duly Accomplished Nomination Form (Appendix 1)
5. Profile of the M/CFARMC (Appendix II)
6. The documents shall be prepared using A4 size paper, and
appropriately bound.
7. The documents have appropriate labeling for easy access of
chapters or parts of documents being evaluated.
8. The executive summary shall not exceed 100 pages, excluding
appendices.
9. An electronic copy of the documents must be submitted to the NTC.

B. Other Documents

The following documents shall be submitted to the NTC:

a. Evaluation form accomplished and signed by the Chairperson of the

Regional Technical Committee (RTC).
b. Comparative assessment form accomplished and signed by the
Chairperson of the Regional Technical Committee.
c. Descriptive evaluation per criterion by the Regional Technical
Committee.
d. Audio-visual presentation about the FARMC and its
accomplishments (maximum of 30 minutes).
e. Short video footages of the FARMC’s operational activities and other
features may be submitted

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

A. Organization. (Total of 10 points).

1. Composition/Membership. The M/CFARMC must have undergone the

organizing process as per the guidelines in FAO 196 and must be composed
of the following members (Sec. 10 of FAO 196):

a. Municipal/City Planning & Development Officer

b. Chairperson, Agriculture/Fisheries Committee of the Sangguniang
Bayan/Panglungsod
c. Representative of the Municipal/City Development Council
d. Representative from an accredited NGO

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 e. Representative from the private sector
f. Representative from the Department of Agriculture (Office of the
Municipal/City Agriculturist)
g. At least eleven (11) fisherfolk representatives [seven (7) municipal
fisherfolk, one (1) fishworker, three (3) commercial fishers] and shall
include the representatives from the youth and women sectors.

Complete representation is required from the LGUs. The other

stakeholders, when present in the municipality/city, should be
represented as required by law. (5 points)

2. Internal policy. The M/CFARMC must have adopted rules and regulations
necessary to govern its proceedings and elections. (2 points)

3. Structure. The committees are organized, and the structural framework

operational. (2 points)

4. Regular Secretariat. (1 point)

B. Performance (Total of 65 points)

The performance of M/CFARMCs shall be evaluated based on nine (9)

criteria:

1. Municipal/City Fishery Development Plan (M/CFDP) – the FARMC

must have actively participated in the formulation of the M/CFDP,
which has been approved, implemented, updated and regularly
endorsed thru resolutions adopted by the LGU. Means of verification
should include: Minutes of the M/CFARMC Meeting with M/CFDP as
agenda; Copy of the M/CFDP approved by the Municipal/City
Development Council (M/CDC) and. Evidence of implementation such
as activity status reports and documentation must be available. The
validity of the plan must be within the period of evaluation. (10 points)

2. Municipal/City Fishery Ordinance (M/CFO). FARMC must have an

active participation in the formulation of the MFO its amendments, if
any; and other fisheries-related local legislations. Means of
verification: Resolution of the M/CFARMC addressed to the
Sangguniang Bayan/Panglungsod endorsing the proposed M/CFO and
its amendments which are implemented, updated and regularly
endorsed by the LGU, if any, and other fisheries-related local
legislation; and Minutes of the M/CFARMC Meeting with the proposed
and approved ordinances as agenda. Fisheries-related local
legislations adopted by provincial board within its jurisdiction may be
included as part of this criterion. (9 points)

3. Conduct of M/CFARMC Meetings and Committee Consultations,

Meetings and Dialogues. The M/CFARMC shall have conducted a
regular meeting based on their internal policy. Means of verification

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 are minutes of the meetings certified by the FARMC Secretary and the
LGU. They shall have conducted regular committee meetings,
consultations and dialogues. The performance of the FARMC
Committees shall be evaluated based on the submission of the minutes
of the meeting Evaluation shall include full attendance of all members
of the M/CFARMC, particularly the LGU representatives, in regular
M/CFARMC meetings. A page of summarized matrix shall be attached
to highlight all the minutes of consultations, meetings and dialogues.
(9 points)

4. Enforcement of Fishery Laws. The M/CFARMC must have assisted by

LGU and other concerned agencies in the formulation and
implementation of the Municipal/City Law Enforcement/Monitoring,
Control and Surveillance Operational Plan. Activities include
coordination with other law enforcement agencies, training/capability
building on law enforcement, assistance in law enforcement
operations/missions and advocacies on fisheries law enforcement.
FARMC Fisheries Law Enforcement Committee shall come up with
recommendations for fisheries law enforcement matters. Means of
verification: minutes of FARMC Meetings indicating the reports and
activities of the FARMC’s Fisheries Law Enforcement Committee
including the recommendations they have formulated (4 points);
Record of fisheries law enforcement activities, apprehensions of
violators, pictures and videos of law enforcement activities conducted
by the FARMC (4 points). A page of summarized matrix shall be
attached to highlight all the law enforcement activities. (Total of 8
points)

5. Policy Advocacy/Advisory Functions. This criterion measures the

success of the M/CFARMC in its partnership efforts with the LGU. This
can be verified by records of consultations done by the LGU with the
FARMC and list of issues discussed, as well as their outcomes. It may
also include recommended resolutions submitted to the Sangguniang
Bayan/Panglungsod and other relevant institutions, verified, updated
and regularly endorsed by LGU as being implemented. This may
include matters on protection, conservation, development and
management as per Sec. 9 of FAO 196. Other means of verification are
copies of resolutions with transmittal letters and other evidences, like
letters of acknowledgement, post marks and receipt stamps.
Commendable and validated resolutions shall be those found
substantive in nature, that is, reflective of the FARMC’s mandates and
functions. (10 points)

6. FARMC Office. The M/CFARMC must establish its own office. The
M/CFARMC shall have its communications and documentation
facilities. (2 points)

7. Management activities for fisheries and aquatic resources,

conservation, rehabilitation, enhancement and development. The

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 M/CFARMC must have initiatives to recommend for the effective
conservation and management of their municipal waters and its
fisheries and aquatic resources. Means of verification is a M/CFARMC
resolution for the management of the local fisheries and municipal
waters be managed sustainably;

7.1. Environmental Management and Development Programs

7.1.a. Declaration of fisheries reserve/sanctuary/marine

protected area, species-specific management of fisheries,
establishment of mariculture/aquaculture park, riverbank
rehabilitation program. Other salient activities may include
mangrove reforestation, upland/watershed area/riverbank
greening program, protection of endangered and/or endemic
species, marine mammal stranding response,
river/lake/bay/coastal clean-up, waste management, color-
coding of boats, monitoring of fish catch, maintenance of coastal
and inland fisheries resources and other resource-based,
community-based management and research-based programs
participated and collaborated in by FARMCs. (3 points)

7.1.b. Coordination with the Local Disaster Risk Reduction and

Management (LDRRM) Office with the identified vulnerable
areas, disaster risk reduction mechanism/projects, activities
implemented for climate-change resilient communities. (3
points)

7.1.c. Coordination with the Local Gender and Development

(GAD) Office on fisheries-based gender and development
program. Means of verification are programs, documents (photos
and videos) and reports of above-mentioned activities. (3 points)

The sustainability of formulated and implemented of outstanding

fisheries program gets a bonus of 3 points. (A total of 9 points plus 3
bonus points)

8. Linkages. The M/CFARMC must have established partnerships and

other collaborative endeavors with other institutions and agencies in
the performance of its duties and functions. Institutions include
national government agencies, NGOs, private sector, academe,
research institutions and development partners. The means of
verification may include copies of communications, resolutions,
ordinances, MOAs, MOUs, Letter of Intent, concept papers and
documentation of activities, projects and programs. Commendable and
relevant linkages are those found substantive in nature, that is,
reflective of the needs and priorities of the FARMC and in accord with
their mandates and functions. (3 points)

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 9. Monitoring and Evaluation. This will assess the M/CFARMC’s response
to the need for documentation of all their activities and that these are
regularly monitored whether these have met the FARMCs’ objectives.
The outstanding performance of M/CFARMC will serve as inspiration
and that the best practices can be emulated by other FARMCs.
Evaluation shall be done in consideration of the previous result as one
of the references as to the existence of accomplishment and evaluation
reports and success stories submitted as supporting documents. (5
points)

C. Sustainability (Total of 25 points)

The indicators for evaluating the sustainability of the M/CFARMC are

resource mobilization, ability to reorganize, capability building programs,
FARMC Database System and relevant and responsive long-term plans.

1. Resource Mobilization. This criterion evaluates M/CFARMC’s response

to the need for identifying qualified people and viable sources of
operating funds for the FARMC and those that are needed for FARMC
initiated projects that may be approved for implementation. Means of
verification are documents indicating the manpower and budget
allocated by the LGU for the operations of the M/CFARMC and its various
activities. Also included are documents or approved proposals that are
being implemented or for implementation, the funding of which are
sourced out from other institutions, agencies or organizations that
support FARMC activities. (5 points).

2. Capacity to Reorganize. The FARMC shall be credited for its capacity to

reorganize and sustain its existence in accordance with FAO 196 and
their internal policy when the term of its officers expires. Means of
verification resolution and set of newly elected officers. (1 point)

3. Capability Building. This evaluates the M/CFARMC’s response to the

need for continuing capability building program. The FARMC shall
design and implement capability building programs in the following
priority areas: fisherfolk leadership, strengthening of fisherfolk
organizations, local legislation, social mobilization, policy advocacy,
parliamentary procedures, preparation of project proposal, project
development, climate change resiliency, disaster preparedness and
integrated coastal resources management. (3 points)

4. Long Term Plans. One of the indicators of continuing activity and vitality
of the FARMC is the existence of a plan. Such a plan should be properly
documented and grounded on the needs and resources of both the
FARMCs and their constituents. It should properly map out its future
programs and activities. Means of verification is a FARMC Plan that is
included in the Municipal Development Plan, approved and executed by

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 the LGU. Fisheries Development Plan or Integrated Coastal Resource
Management Plan may be considered in this criterion. (3 points)

5. FARMC Databank/Database System. Existing records using the FARMC

Database System developed by the BFAR National FARMC Program
Management Center as basis is established and accessible. Means of
verification is an operational FARMC database system where records
about the FARMC and the municipality’s coastal resources are easily
accessible. (3 points)

6. Municipal/City Fisherfolk and Boat Registration. The M/CFARMC must

assist the BFAR and LGU in the conduct fisherfolk and boat registrations
in the municipality/city. Evidence of verification are duly accomplished
Fisherfolk and Boat Registration Forms using the prescribed forms and
updated master list of registered fisherfolk and boat in the
municipality/city. (5 points)

(A total of 8 points)

7. Development of Livelihood Programs, Projects and Activities. This refers

to the ability of the council to formulate, develop, implement, sustain and
monitor various programs, projects and activities on livelihood.
Approved and fully funded project proposals and resolutions are the
supporting documents that would serve as indicators for this particular
criterion. At the implementation level, there must be clear and tangible
proofs showing that livelihood interventions have resulted to socio-
economic upliftment and improved quality of life of the fisherfolk-
beneficiaries. (5 points)

D. Awards and Citations to the FARMC

This criterion evaluates the FARMC’s outstanding accomplishments and its
impact in the community and beneficiaries. This is verified by awards and
citations received by the FARMC as a body and/or its officers from various
institutions during the period of evaluation. Such commendable awards
shall be given to the FARMC and are within the scope of the FARMC’s
mandated functions. (Maximum of three (3) Bonus Points)

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 Appendix I
NOMINATION FORM

Outstanding Municipal/City Fisheries and Aquatic Resources

Management Council (M/CFARMC) of the Year ______

Name of the M/CFARMC : ___________________________________________________

Address (Municipality/Province/Region) _____________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Name of LGU FARMC Coordinator: _____________________________________________

Justification for Nomination:

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Nominated by:

Signature over Printed Name

Position and Agency
Endorsed by:

Signature over Printed Name

Provincial Fisheries Director or
Provincial Fisheries Officer/Provincial Agriculturist

Attested by:

Signature over Printed Name

Regional Director, Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 Appendix II
FARMC PROFILE/SHEET
Outstanding Municipal/City Fisheries and Aquatic Resources
Management Council (M/CFARMC) of the Year ______
A. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
1. Name of the FARMC : _______________________________________________

2. Address: __________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
3. Date Organized: (Day/Month/Year) ____________________________________

4. Composition of the FARMC

a. Name of Officers Major Occupation

Chairperson: ______________________________________ ____________________

Vice Chairperson:______________________________________ ____________________
Secretary: ______________________________________ ____________________
Treasurer: ______________________________________ ____________________
Auditor: ______________________________________ ____________________

b. Name of Members

City/Municipal Planning and Development Officer: ________________________

Chairperson, Sangguniang Bayan/Panglungsod

Committee on Agriculture & Fisheries: ______________________________________

Representative, Municipal/City
Development Council (MDC/CDC) : __________________________________________

Representative, Municipal/City Agriculture Office _________________________

Representative, accredited Non-Government

Organization ___________________________________________________________________
(Please state name of NGO and include a brief description of the NGOs’ major
involvement in fisheries related activities.)
Representative, Private Sector_______________________________________________
(Please describe major involvement as a stakeholder in the private sector).

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 Fisherfolk Members: Name of Fisherfolk Organization
_____________________________ ____________________________
_____________________________ ____________________________
_____________________________ ____________________________
_____________________________ ____________________________
_____________________________ ____________________________
_____________________________ ____________________________
_____________________________ ____________________________
_____________________________ ____________________________
_____________________________ ____________________________
_____________________________ ____________________________
_____________________________ ____________________________
(Please identify those from the commercial fisheries sector, women’s
organization and youth organization)

Secretariat:
Name of Secretarial Occupation
______________________________________ ________________________________
______________________________________ ________________________________
______________________________________ ________________________________

c. FARMC Committees

Name of FARMC Committee: Chairperson

Rehabilitation and Conservation ______________________________

Research, Education and Training ______________________________

Law Enforcement ______________________________

Legislation and Prosecution ______________________________

Livelihood Opportunities ______________________________

Pollution Control ______________________________

Land and Water Use ______________________________

Settlement ______________________________

Others:

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 _____________________________________ ______________________________

_____________________________________ ______________________________

Make a brief description of the main functions of each Committee and their
major activities and accomplishments and how these have contributed to effective
management of the fisheries and aquatic resources and the municipal waters as a
whole.

d. The FARMC Internal Policy

Make a brief description of the internal policy, describe briefly the process
that the FARMC has undergone on how it was formulated and how having one
contributed to the smooth operation of the FARMC.

Attach a copy of the FARMC Internal Policy.

B. PERFORMANCE

1. Municipal/City Fishery Development Plan

Make a summary describing the Municipal/City Fishery Development Plan and

how the FARMC was involved in its formulation, its major contributions and
involvement in the plan’s activities. Describe how the involvement of the FARMC
has contributed to the enhancement/effectiveness of the Plan.
Please attach the following:
a. Minutes of the FARMC Meetings and attendance sheet duly certified by the
FARMC Chairman with the formulation of recommendations to the M/CFDP as
agenda or among the agenda of the meeting.
b. Copy of the Municipal/City Fisheries Development Plan approved by the
City/Municipal Development Council (MDC).
c. Proofs of implementation such as activity status reports and documentation.

2. Municipal/City Fishery Ordinance (M/CFO)

Present a summary of the purpose of the M/CFO and how the FARMC was involved
in its formulation and approval, the efforts made by the FARMC for its passage, the
FARMC’s major contribution in its implementation and the impact the FARMC has
made in the successful execution of the policy.
Please attach the following:
a. Resolution of the M/CFARMC addressed to the Sangguniang
Bayan/Panglungsod endorsing the proposed Municipal/City Fisheries
Ordinance.
b. Minutes of the M/CFARMC Meeting with the proposed ordinance as agenda.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 3. Conduct of Council and Committee Consultations, Meetings and Dialogues

Make a brief description of the activities and accomplishments of each committee

of the FARMC. State the impact of these activities and how it has contributed
towards effective management of municipal waters and fisheries and aquatic
resources.

a. No. of FARMC meetings conducted for the period of evaluation (for the past 3
years) ______
b. No. of Committee meetings conducted for the period of evaluation (for the
past 3 years) ______
c. No. of FARMC dialogues/consultations conducted for the period of evaluation
(for the past 3 years) ______

Please attach the following:

a. Duly certified minutes of each of these meetings/dialogues.
b. Attendance sheets of each of these meetings/dialogues/consultations.

4. Enforcement of Fishery Laws.

Present a summary of the activities of the FARMC on fisheries law enforcement,

the impacts of their activities and how these have contributed towards improving
the state of the fisheries resources in the city or municipality.

Please attach the following:

a. Bantay Dagat/MCS Operational Plan
b. Reports of the activities of the Law Enforcement Committee
c. List of the City/Municipal Bantay Dagat Composite Team
d. Record of apprehensions of violators and status
e. Photos of Bantay Dagat/Law Enforcement Operations
f. Minutes of FARMC Meetings indicating the reports and activities of the
FARMC’s Fisheries Law Enforcement Committee including the
recommendations they have formulated.
g. Other evidence of law enforcement activities such as coordination with
other law enforcement agencies, training/capability building on law
enforcement, assistance in law enforcement operations/missions and
advocacy on fisheries law enforcement.

5. Policy Advocacy/Advisory Functions

Present a brief description of the FARMC activities on advocacy and as advisory

body to the LGU. Describe the impact made by these activities to the attitudes of
the general population, key institutions and in the management of the fisheries
and aquatic resources. Describe the FARMC interventions that have major
significance and impact and why.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 a. Total no. of resolutions formulated for recommendation to the
Sangguniang Bayan/Panglungsod or other relevant institutions ___________

Title of Resolution Outcome

(Approved/Implemented or Not)

_______________________________ _____________________________________
_______________________________ _____________________________________
_______________________________ _____________________________________
_______________________________ _____________________________________
_______________________________ _____________________________________

Please attach copies of these resolutions with transmittal letters and other
evidence of transmittal, like letters of response, post mark and receipt stamps.
Please use additional sheets if necessary.

6. FARMC Office.

Date/Year FARMC Office was established: ____________________________________________

Please attach a photo of the FARMC Office.
Describe how having a FARMC Office has contributed to the better management
of the FARMC operations.

7. Management Activities.

Describe the various activities of the FARMC on the management of their fisheries
and aquatic resources. State the effects and impacts to the general situation of the
municipal fisheries and the welfare of its fisherfolk population and the general
public. Describe innovative activities and special accomplishments that make the
FARMC stand out from among the other FARMCs in the country and how this
makes them Outstanding.

Please attach the following:

a. Copy of the FARMC Resolution recommending for the establishment of the
Marine Protected Area/Fish Sanctuary or other management area.
b. Copy of Municipal/City Ordinance establishing the MPA/Fish Sanctuary
c. Copy of Provincial Ordinance and/or Resolution supporting the
establishment of MPA/Fish Sanctuary if available
d. Copy of the MPA/Fish Sanctuary Management Plan
e. Report of activities based on the above management plan
f. Photos of activities in the MPA/Fish Sanctuary

Other activities:
a. Number of propagules of mangrove planted: _______ area (ha.) _________
b. Record of survival rate of mangrove planted _______

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 c. List of other activities conducted by/participated in by the FARMC
regarding resources conservation, rehabilitation and enhancement based
on these criteria as listed above.

Name of Activity Date Conducted Outcome

________________________ ______________________ ________________________
________________________ ______________________ ________________________
________________________ ______________________ ________________________
________________________ ______________________ ________________________

Please attach photos and related documents indicating actual implementation of

the above activities.

8. Linkages

State the major linkages and network of the FARMC, the nature of these
partnerships and how each has contributed to the success of the activities of the
FARMC as well as its significant contributions to the management of the fisheries
and aquatic resources in the municipality.

Institutions/Agencies/Organizations Nature of Linkage with the FARMC

(Technical Assistance, Project Donor,
Network, Project Partner, etc.)

_________________________________________ __________________________________________

_________________________________________ __________________________________________

_________________________________________ __________________________________________

_________________________________________ __________________________________________

_________________________________________ __________________________________________

Please attach communications, certificates, concept papers, list of activities

conducted, meetings attended with other institutions.

9. Monitoring and Evaluation

Describe how the FARMC conducts monitoring and evaluation of their own
activities and how these strategies have helped make them Outstanding.
Please attach the following:
a. M/CFARMC Accomplishment Reports
b. Reports highlighting activities of the FARMC
Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC
 c. Report of Evaluation of FARMC activities
d. Success stories
e. List of issues and concerns regarding the FARMC operations and how these
are addressed by the FARMC.

C. SUSTAINABILITY

1. Resource mobilization.

Describe how the FARMC mobilizes resources and contributes to successful

implementation of their planned activities. Cites innovations that make them unique
from other FARMCs in terms of effective fund sourcing and related activities.

A certification from the Budget Officer and the Mayor that the amount is allocated for
the operations of the FARMC must be attached. Certification must be provided for the
past 3 years in review.

Amount allocated by the LGU for FARMC Operations for the current year:
PhP _________

Please attach photocopies of official documents reflecting this amount.

Amount allocated for FARMC activities from other sources:

Program/Project/Activity Name of Institution/Partner Amount (PhP)

_____________________________ _________________________________ ________________

_____________________________ _________________________________ ________________
_____________________________ _________________________________ ________________
_____________________________ _________________________________ ________________

Please attach photocopies of official documents reflecting this amount.

2. Capacity to reorganize.

Describe how the FARMC has demonstrated its capacity to reorganize and the
activities conducted related to this. State major impacts of the reorganizations
made.

Date when latest reorganized: ___________

No. of times the FARMC has been reorganized: __________

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 3. Capability building.

Describe how the FARMC takes effort to continuously capacitate their members
and how these activities have contributed to a better performance for the FARMC.

Activities for Capability Building for the FARMC Date Conducted

a. ___________________________________________________ __________________
b. ___________________________________________________ __________________
c. ___________________________________________________ __________________
d. ___________________________________________________ __________________
e. ___________________________________________________ __________________

4. Long term plans.

Describe the long-term plan of the FARMC and how it has contributed to the
overall performance and sustainability of the FARMC.

Please attach five-year or ten-year M/CFARMC Plan.

Evidence that the plan has been approved and included in the Municipal/City
Fisheries Development Plan, and executed by the LGU.

5. FARMC Databank/Database System.

General description of the FARMC Database System, how it operates, who operates
the system, how the FARMC contributes data to the system, the reports generated
by the system.

State the instances when the FARMC or the LGU was able to use the information
generated by the database system and the outcome of these activities.

Please attach a printed copy of the reports generated by the FARMC Database.

Municipal/City Fisherfolk and Boat Registration

Make a brief description of the nature of the fisherfolk and boat population in the
municipality/city, their demographic and economic profile, how they affect the
economy of the municipality/city and the use of resources, the significance of the
fisherfolk and boat population.

Total Number of Registered Fisherfolk in the Municipality/City: _______________

Total Number of Registered Boat in the Municipality/City:__________________

Please attach a Master List of Registered Fisherfolk and Boat per Barangay.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 6. Development of Livelihood Programs, Projects and Activities

Describe how the Council is able to develop, formulate and implement various
programs, projects and activities.

Please attach resolutions, project proposals, success stories, pictorials and reports
e.g. book of records/business operation and impact assessment.

D. AWARDS/CITATIONS

Brief description of each award received by the FARMC and why it was awarded
to the FARMC. Describe why these awards make the FARMC Outstanding.

Name of Award/Citation Date Awarded Agency

_____________________________ ________________ __________________
_____________________________ ________________ __________________
_____________________________ ________________ __________________

Please attach brochures/publications of success stories.

NOTE: The FARMC Documentation shall not exceed 100 pages. Other details such as
attachments as documentary proof and to elaborate the reporting of the FARMC’s
activities shall be made as appendices and bound separately with corresponding labels
and tabs. The contents of the FARMC Documentation must be presented in a Table of
Contents in the beginning of the Document, both in the main Documentation and in the
Appendices.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 Appendix III
EVALUATION FORM

Gawad Saka
Search for Outstanding FARMC
Evaluation Form

Name of FARMC:___________________________________________________________

Date of Evaluation:___________________________________________________________

Criteria for Evaluation

A. Organization. (Total of 10 points).

1. Composition/Membership. The M/CFARMC must have undergone the organizing

process as per the guidelines in FAO 196 and must be comprised of the following
members, as per Sec. 10 of FAO 196:

b. Municipal/City Planning & Development Officer

c. Chairperson, Agriculture/Fisheries Committee of the Sangguniang
Bayan/Panglungsod
d. Representative of the Municipal/City Development Council
e. Representative from an accredited NGO
f. Representative from the private sector
g. Representative from the Department of Agriculture (Office of the
Municipal/City Agriculturist)
h. At least eleven (11) fisherfolk representatives [seven (7) municipal fisherfolk,
one (1) fishworker, three (3) commercial fishers] and shall include the
representatives from the youth and women sectors.

Complete representation is required from those from the LGUs. The other
stakeholders, when present in the municipality, should be represented as required
by law. This is equivalent to five (5) points.

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 2. Internal policy. The M/CFARMC must have adopted rules and regulations
necessary to govern its proceedings and elections. This is equivalent to two (2)
points.

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

3. Structure. The committees are organized, and the structural framework

operational. This is equivalent to two (2) points.

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

4. It has to have a regular Secretariat. This is equivalent to one (1) point.

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

B. Performance (Total of 65 points)

The performance of M/CFARMCs shall be evaluated based on ten (10) criteria:

1. Municipal/City Fishery Development Plan – the FARMC must have actively

participated in the formulation of the Municipal/City Fisheries Development Plan
(M/CFDP), which has been approved and implemented by the LGU. Means of
verification: Minutes of the M/CFARMC Meeting with M/CFDP as agenda. Copy of
the Municipal/City Fisheries Development Plan approved by the Municipal
Development Council (MDC). Proofs of implementation such as activity status
reports and documentation must be available. (10 points).

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 2. Municipal/City Fishery Ordinance (M/CFO). FARMC must have active
participation in the formulation of the MFO its amendments, if any; and other
fisheries-related local legislation. Means of verification: Resolution of the
M/CFARMC addressed to the Sangguniang Bayan/Panglungsod endorsing the
proposed Municipal/City Fisheries Ordinance and its amendments, if any, and
other fisheries-related local legislation; and Minutes of the M/CFARMC Meeting
with the proposed ordinance as agenda (9 points).

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 3. Conduct of M/CFARMC Meetings and Committee consultations, meetings and
dialogues. The M/CFARMC shall have conducted a regular meeting based on their
internal policy. Means of verification are minutes of the meetings certified by the
FARMC Secretary and the LGU. They shall have conducted committee meetings,
consultations and dialogues. Creditable minutes of the meetings shall be those
having substance that fall under the FARMC’s functions and mandates.
Evaluation shall include full attendance of all members of the M/CFARMC,
particularly the LGU representatives, in regular M/CFARMC meetings. (9 points).

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 4. Enforcement of Fishery Laws. The M/CFARMC must have assisted in the
formulation of the Municipal Law Enforcement Operational Plan. It should have
a FARMC Fisheries Law Enforcement Committee that is able to come up with
recommendations for fisheries law enforcement matters. Means of verification:
minutes of FARMC Meetings indicating the reports and activities of the Fisheries
Law Enforcement Committee (4 points); Record of apprehensions of violators (4
points). (Total of 8 points)

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 5. Policy Advocacy/Advisory Functions. This criterion measures the success of the
M/CFARMC in its partnership efforts with the LGU. This can be verified by
records of consultations made by the LGU with the FARMC and list of issues
discussed, as well as their outcomes. It may also include recommended
resolutions submitted to the Sangguniang Bayan/Panglungsod and other
relevant institutions and verified as being implemented. This may include
matters on management, conservation, development, protection as per Sec. 9 of
FAO 196. Other means of verification are copies of resolutions with transmittal
letters and other proofs of transmittal, like letters of response, post mark and
receipt stamps. Creditable resolutions shall be those found substantive in nature,
that is, reflective of the FARMC’s mandates and functions. (10 points)

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 6. FARMC Office. The M/CFARMC must have established an office or secured an
office space. The M/CFARMC shall have a mailing address and contact numbers,
if possible. (2 points)

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

7. Management activities for fisheries and aquatic resources protection,

conservation, rehabilitation, enhancement and development. The M/CFARMC
must have initiatives to recommend for the effective management of their
municipal waters and its fisheries and aquatic resources. Means of verification is
a M/CFARMC resolution for the management of the local fisheries and that a
portion of the municipal water be managed sustainably;

7.1. Environmental Management and Development Programs

7.1.a. Declaration of fisheries reserve/sanctuary/marine protected area,

species-specific management of fisheries, establishment of
mariculture/aquaculture park, riverbank protection program. Other salient
activities may include mangrove reforestation, upland/watershed
area/riverbank greening program, protection of endangered and/or
endemic species, marine mammal stranding response,
river/lake/bay/coastal clean-up, waste management, color-coding of boats,
monitoring of fish catch, maintenance of coastal and inland fisheries
resources and other resource-based and community-based management
programs participated in by FARMCs. (3 points).

7.1.b. Identification of climate-change vulnerable areas, disaster risk

reduction mechanism/projects, activities implemented for climate-change
resilient communities. (3 points).

7.1.c. Fisheries-based gender and development program, Means of

verification are documents, photos, videos and reports of above-mentioned
activities. (3 points).

Successful formulation and implementation of unique fisheries program

gets a bonus of 3 points. (A total of 9 points plus 3 bonus points).

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

8. Linkages. The M/CFARMC must have established partnerships with other

institutions in the performance of its duties. Institutions include national
government agencies, NGOs, private sectors, academe and research institutions,
etc. The means of verification may include copies of communications, concept
papers and documentation of activities, projects and programs. Creditable
linkages are those found substantive in nature, that is, reflective of the need of
the FARMC and in accord with their mandates and functions. (3 points).

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC
 9. Monitoring and Evaluation. This will evaluate the M/CFARMC’s response to the
need for documentation of all their activities and that these are regularly
evaluated whether these have met the FARMCs’ objectives. Their successful
endeavors can be made an inspiration and that the best practices can be
emulated by other FARMCs. Evaluation shall be made as to the existence of
accomplishment reports, evaluation reports and success stories submitted to the
LGU cc: BFAR Regional FARMC Program Management Center. (5 points).

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

C. Sustainability (Total of 25 points)

The indicators for evaluating the sustainability of the M/CFARMC are resource
mobilization, ability to reorganize, capability building programs, FARMC Database
System and quality of long-term plans.

1. Resource mobilization. This criterion evaluates M/CFARMC’s response to the

need for identifying viable sources of operating funds for the FARMC and those
that are needed for FARMC-led projects that may be approved for
implementation. Means of verification are documents indicating the amount
allocated by the LGU for the operations of the M/CFARMC and its various
activities. Also included are documents or approved proposals that are being
implemented or for implementation, the funding of which are sourced out from
other institutions, agencies or organizations that support FARMC activities. (5
points).

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 2. Capacity to reorganize. The FARMC shall be credited for its capacity to reorganize
in accordance with FAO 196 and their internal policy when the term of its officers
expires. (1 point)

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

3. Capability building. This evaluates the M/CFARMC’s response to the need for
continuing capability building program. The FARMC shall have designed and
implemented capability building programs in the following critical areas:
fisherfolk leadership, strengthening of fisherfolk organizations, local legislation,
social mobilization, policy advocacy, parliamentary procedures, project
development, and integrated coastal resources management. (3 points).

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 4. Long term plans. One of the indicators of continuing activity and vitality of the
FARMC is the existence of a plan. Such a plan should be properly documented
and grounded on the needs and resources of both the FARMCs and their
constituents. It should properly map out its future programs and activities.
Means of verification is a FARMC Plan that is included in the Municipal
Development Plan, approved and executed by the LGU. (3 points).

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

5. FARMC Databank/Database System. Existing records using the FARMC Database

System developed by the BFAR National FARMC Program Management Center as
basis is established and accessible. Means of verification is an operational FARMC
database system where records about the FARMC and the municipality’s coastal
resources are easily accessible. (3 points).

Municipal Fisherfolk Registry. The M/CFARMC must have assisted the LGU in
maintaining a registry of municipal fisherfolk in the municipality/city. Proof of
verification are accomplished Fisherfolk Registration Forms using FARMC
Database Form No. 2 (attached) updated annually and a master list of fisherfolk
in the municipality. (5 points).
(A total of 8 points)

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 6. Development of Livelihood programs, projects and activities. This refers to the
ability of the Council to develop, formulate and implement various programs,
projects and activities on livelihood. Resolutions and project proposals are among
the necessary supporting documents that would serve as objective verifiable
indicator for this particular criterion. It must be noted however that the way to
gauge this specific accomplishment goes beyond the documents. At the
implementation level, there must be clear and tangible proofs showing that
livelihood interventions have resulted to socio-economic upliftment and
improved quality of life of the fisherfolk-beneficiaries. (5 points).

Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

D. Awards and Citations to the FARMC (Maximum of 3 Bonus Points)

This criterion evaluates the FARMC’s outstanding accomplishments and its status
in the community. This is verified by awards and citations received by the FARMC
from various institutions. Credited awards shall be those that are given to the FARMC
and are within the scope of the FARMC’s mandated functions. One or two
awards/citations (1 point); 3 awards/citations (2 points); 4 or more awards/citations
(3 points).
Observations and Comments Score

Please use additional pages if necessary.

Other Comments
Innovative Accomplishments, Excellent Qualities of the FARMC

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

 Appendix IV
SCORE SHEET FORM/DOCUMENT
Scoring Sheet Document Gawad Saka Search for
Outstanding FARMC
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Agriculture
Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources

Summary of Evaluation
FARMC National Technical Committee

Name and location of FARMC: _____________________________________________

Maximum Bonus Points Earned

CRITERIA Points Points

A. ORGANIZATION 10
1. Membership 5
2. Internal policy 2
3. Structure 2
4. Secretariat 1
B. PERFORMANCE 65
1. Municipal/City Fishery Development Plan 10
2. Municipal Fishery Ordinance (MFO) 9
3. Conduct of Council and Committee 9
consultations, meetings, dialogues
4. Enforcement of Fishery Laws 8
5. Policy Advocacy/Advisory Functions 10
6. M/CFARMC Office 2
7. Management Activities 9 3
8. Linkages 3
9. Monitoring and Evaluation 5
C. SUSTAINABILITY 25
1. Resource mobilization 5
2. Capacity to reorganize 1
3. Capability building programs 3
4. Long term plans 3
5. FARMC Databank/Database 8
System/Municipal Fisherfolk Registry
6. Development of livelihood programs, 5
projects and activities.
E. AWARDS AND CITATIONS 3
1. 1-2 awards/citations 1
2. 3 awards/citations 2
3. 4 or more awards/citations 3
TOTAL 100

________________________________
Printed Name and Signature of Evaluation

Outstanding City/Municipal FARMC

ANNEX 24. Local
Government Unit (Provincial,
Municipal, City)
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS
(PROVINCIAL, MUNICIPALITY, AND CITY)

I. RATIONALE

In the context of providing agriculture and fisheries (AF) programs and services toward
a Masaganang Agrikultura at Maunlad na Ekonomiya Patungo sa Bagong Pilipinas, local
government units (LGUs) serve as crucial agents in driving rural development, food
security, and economic growth. Through the implementation of AF programs, LGUs play
an essential role in delivering key services, infrastructure, and innovations that empower
farmers and fisherfolk to increase productivity, enhance resilience, and promote
competitiveness in the sector.

Guided by several key national policies, such as Republic Act No. 7160, also known as the
Local Government Code of 1991, and Executive Order No. 138, s. 2021, which mandates
the full devolution of certain functions from the Executive Branch to LGUs, the role of
LGUs in the agriculture and fisheries sector has been significantly expanded. These laws
have strengthened LGUs' responsibilities in planning, coordinating, and implementing
various AF programs, which are now essential to the modernization and industrialization
of Philippine agriculture.

Additionally, the Province-led Agriculture and Fisheries Extension System (PAFES), a

strategic initiative of the Department of Agriculture, supports the institutionalization of
provincial-level AF planning and implementation. PAFES facilitates the integration of
local AF programs with national initiatives, encouraging synergy and cooperation
between the provincial LGUs and other stakeholders.

Despite challenges such as resource constraints, governance issues, and varying levels of
political support for agriculture, the commitment of LGUs remains steadfast. Recognizing
the achievements of provincial, city, and municipal LGUs honors their hard work and
success, while motivating continuous improvement and prioritization of the AF sector.

The Gawad Saka Search for Outstanding LGUs is designed to recognize the vital
contributions of LGUs in fostering agricultural and fisheries sector development. This
award highlights the importance of LGUs' collaboration with national agencies, local
stakeholders, and communities to achieve sustainable rural development and food
security. By incentivizing LGUs to prioritize agricultural initiatives, the award aims to
inspire a collective commitment to agricultural transformation and economic growth
across the country.

This Guidelines serves as a reference for the search, screening, validation, and
determination of outstanding LGUs at the provincial, city, and municipal levels,
celebrating their best practices, achievements, and contributions to the agriculture and
fisheries sector under the framework of key national laws and policies.

Outstanding LGU (Provincial, Municipality, City)

 II. OBJECTIVES

The Gawad Saka Search for Outstanding P/C/MLGU aims to recognize the exceptional
contributions and interventions of the LGUs in the development of the agriculture and
fisheries sector in their areas of coverage.

General Objective: This search aims to recognize and award the outstanding Provincial,
City, and Municipal LGUs that have shown exemplary performance and contributions in
the development of the agricultural and fisheries sector in their locality.

Specifically, this Search aims to:

1. Recognize and award provincial, city, and municipal LGUs that demonstrate
exceptional planning, development, and implementation of agriculture and
fisheries programs and projects;
2. Provide incentives and benefits that motivate provincial, city, and municipal LGUs
to prioritize agricultural and fisheries sector development; and
3. Institutionalize a mechanism that recognizes local governments for their
significant contributions to agricultural and fisheries sector growth, ensuring
sustained efforts in the sector's advancement.

III. SCOPE

The Gawad Saka Search is open to all Provinces, Municipalities, and Cities in the
Philippines that have achieved exemplary contributions to the development of the
agricultural and fisheries sector. The competition is divided into three categories to
ensure equitable assessment:

CATEGORY AND SCOPE

1st Category: Municipalities (1st - 6th Income Class Municipalities)
2nd Category: City (1st-6th Income Class Cities, HUCs, Component Cities)
3rd Category: Provinces (1st-6th Income Class Provinces)

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

For Provincial LGUs:

a. Must be endorsed by the Regional Search Committee for the national search.
b. Must have a regional winner of Gawad Saka in any category for the last five years of
search implementation.
c. Must have an agriculture, veterinary, and/or agricultural and biosystems engineering
office1.
d. Must have 3% of budget allocation for AF in the total national tax allocation (NTA) of
the LGU.
e. Must be implementing ordinances and guidelines supporting the AF sector.
f. Must have an organized Agriculture and Fishery Council.

1
Per Section 3 of the Civil Service Commission Memorandum Circular No. 12, series of 2022, “2022 Guidelines and Standards in the
Establishment of Organization Structures and Staffing Patterns in LGUs”

Outstanding LGU (Provincial, Municipality, City)

 For Municipal and City LGUs:

a. Must be endorsed by the Regional Search Committee for the national search
b. Must have an agriculture, veterinary, and/or agricultural and biosystems engineering
office¹.
c. Must have 2% of budget allocation for AF in the total NTA of the LGU.
d. Must be implementing ordinances and guidelines supporting the AF sector.
e. Must have an organized Agriculture and Fishery Council.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

Endorsement of the Regional Search Committee to the National Executive Committee;

Notarized Form 1. Nomination Form;
Notarized Form 2. Nominee Data Form;

The following documents must be compiled and submitted:

Certified Copy of Approved AF Plans and Budget

1. Annual Investment Plan (AIP) or other related Annual Work Plans;
2. Provincial/Municipal/City Comprehensive Development Plan, Local Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Plan, Food Security Plan, and other AF-related strategic
plans;
3. Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the establishment of Province-led Agriculture
and Fisheries Extension System (PAFES) and/or Collaborative Provincial Agriculture
and Fisheries Extension Program (CPAFEP) (for province only);
4. Provincial Commodity Investment Plan (PCIP);
5. Local Cooperative Development Plan for Agriculture and Fishery; and
6. Budget allocation, utilization, and disbursement report/s certified by a budget
officer/accountant and provincial/municipal/city accountant intended for AF
projects, programs, and activities (PPAs) for the last three (3) years.

Certified Copy of Approved AF Reports

1. Certified copy of Annual Accomplishment Report (Physical and Financial) for the last
three (3) years;
2. Documentation of accomplishments;
3. Link of existing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) and/or reporting system;
4. Program beneficiary lists detailing the marginalized sector beneficiaries of AF
programs/projects (youth, rural women, indigenous people); and
5. Gender and development (GAD) reports related to AF.

Certified Copy of Approved AF Policies

1. Relevant ordinances/resolutions relative to the advancement of the AF sector and
other AF-related concerns in their area of coverage, including prevention and control
of plant diseases, animal pests and diseases, as well as the imposition and collection
of illegal fees and taxes relative to the transport of goods and services.

Outstanding LGU (Provincial, Municipality, City)

 Manpower and Staffing
1. LGU Staffing Report - Document showing the adequacy of manpower, including
extension workers, fishery officers, agricultural and biosystems engineer, and
veterinarians; and
2. Organizational Chart - A visual representation of the LGU’s organizational structure.

Registration and Databases

1. Farmer and Fisherfolk Registration Databases - Updated lists from systems like
Registry System for Basic Sectors in Agriculture (RSBSA), National Coconut Farmers
Registry System (NCFRS), Municipal Fisherfolk Registration System (FishR);
2. List/Record of Farmers/Fisherfolk, Farmer/Fisherfolk Cooperatives, Associations,
and Clusters;
3. List of local enterprises registered in the Farmers and Fisherfolks Enterprise
Development Information System (FFEDIS) in support of Sagip Saka Law
implementation;
4. Lists and photo documentation of FITS Centers and Kiosks, ATI-certified Learning
Sites for Agriculture (LSAs), TESDA-accredited Farm Schools, DOT-accredited farm
tourism sitesl; and
5. Inventory of functional agriculture-related infrastructure (e.g., farm-to-market roads,
agriculture facilities (post-harvest, cold storage facilities, etc.), processing centers,
trading centers, animal evacuation center, etc.).

Other Documents:
1. Memoranda of agreement (MOA) of existing AF program/project documents/reports
with external partners (including projects for the past three years);
2. Hard copies of proof/evidence of AF-related programs, beneficiaries, success stories,
including the link where the files were uploaded/distributed; and
3. Video presentation of Provincial/City/Municipal LGU’s AF-related initiatives
including innovations, best practices, and success stories (maximum of 15 minutes).

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

There are four general criteria considered in evaluating the outstanding LGU, namely
Program Planning, Development, and Implementation; Organizational Capacity and
Resources; Stakeholder Engagement and Capacity Building; and Innovative Practices and
Resilience.

Criteria Description Weight (%)

Program Evaluates the comprehensiveness and effectiveness of

Planning, the LGU's planning process, budget allocation,
Development, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of agri
39
and fishery projects. It also measures how well LGUs
Implementation incorporate national policies, coordinate with
stakeholders, and include marginalized groups.

Outstanding LGU (Provincial, Municipality, City)

 Organizational Assesses the capacity of the LGU’s manpower and
Capacity and resources for delivering agri fishery services. It includes
Resources staffing adequacy, farmer-to-extension worker ratios, 13
and the availability of databases and systems for
monitoring farmers and fisherfolk. Infrastructure and
funding are also evaluated.
Stakeholder Measures the LGU's ability to engage with stakeholders
Engagement and like farmers, fisherfolk, civil society organizations, and
Capacity other sectors. This includes organizing farmer groups, 27
Building capacity-building efforts, and fostering partnerships.

Innovative Evaluates the LGU's commitment to innovation and

Practices and resilience. This includes the adoption of climate-resilient
Resilience practices, new technologies, disaster risk reduction 21
strategies, and reducing vulnerability to external shocks
(e.g. pests and diseases).
Total 100%

Outstanding LGU (Provincial, Municipality, City)

VII. APPENDICES

Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT (PROVINCIAL/MUNICIPAL/CITY)

Name of the LGU :

Address :

Province/Region :
Justification for Nomination :

Nominated by :
Signature Over Printed Name (DA - Regional Field Office)

Position :
Address :

Outstanding LGU (Provincial, Municipality, City)

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

OUTSTANDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT (PROVINCIAL/MUNICIPAL/CITY)

I. Brief Profile of the Province/Municipality/City

1. Name of the LGU :

2. Address :
3. Total Agricultural Land Area (ha) :
4. Number of Municipalities (for pLGUs) :
5. Number of Barangays :
6. Number of LGU-Agricultural Extension Workers
:
● Plantilla Positions
● Casual Positions (including Job
Orders/Contractual)
● Total
7. Number of registered Farmers, Fisherfolk, and AF
Enterprises in RSBSA, NCFRS, FishR, and FFEDIS:
● RSBSA
● NCFRS
● FishR
● FFEDIS
● Total
8. Total number of Farmers and Fisherfolk
Organizations in the province :
9. Priority Commodities :
______________________________________________ _________________________________________
______________________________________________ _________________________________________
______________________________________________ _________________________________________

10. List of Farmers and Fisherfolk Organizations capacitated by the PLGU for the last three (3)
years.

1.
2.
3.
8.
9.
10.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.

Outstanding LGU (Provincial, Municipality, City)

ANNEX 25. Agricultural
Scientist
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING AGRICULTURAL SCIENTIST

I. RATIONALE

The Gawad Saka is an annual search for achievers in Agriculture and Fisheries. It aims to
recognize outstanding achievers in agriculture and fisheries that represent the stakeholders of
the community-farmers, fisherfolk, farm communities, scientists and organizations. The activity
started in 1970 with the launch of the Search for Outstanding Farmers of the Year. Through the
years, the annual search expanded to many other productive agricultural endeavors. In 1987, the
Outstanding Agricultural Scientist was included as one of the categories.
The Outstanding Agricultural Scientist Category gives recognition to the achievements
and contributions of scientists who are instrumental in the refinement and ultimate application
of technologies that help the development of the agriculture sector.

II. OBJECTIVES

• To recognize scientists with outstanding accomplishments in basic and applied research

in agriculture and fisheries
• To identify outstanding scientists whose work has resulted in outstanding and relevant
technology or technologies and/or information with high impact to the research
community and to the lives of the Filipino farmer and fisherfolk
• To encourage budding scientists to achieve excellence in research and development

III. SCOPE

The search provides awards for Filipino scientists who have successfully demonstrated
exemplary performance in research and development in agriculture/fisheries and other related
fields.

The category is open to all local research implementing institutions.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

a. Must be a Filipino citizen

b. Must have earned a Bachelor’s and Master’s degree or higher in agriculture/fisheries or
other related field
c. Must have been a program/project leader of agriculture/fisheries-related projects(s)
d. Nominee should be in active service in a local research implementing institution during
the nomination period
e. Previous awardees are no longer qualified

V. SEARCH RULES AND REGULATIONS

1. Applicants must be nominated by their respective agency heads. The nominator can
endorse only one candidate.

2. The regional nominee shall be endorsed by respective DA RFO Regional Executive

Director (RED) to the Gawad Saka - National Secretariat.

Outstanding Agricultural Scientist

 3. Nominations should be made using the prescribed DA nomination form (DA-OAS
Form 1) and notarized accordingly. The accomplished nomination form should be
accompanied by the nominee’s curriculum vitae (DA-OAS Form 2).

4. The nominee must sign the nomination form (DA-OAS Form 1) attesting to all facts stated
therein; giving consent to the independent verification by the National Technical
Committee (NTC) created for this purpose and indicating his/her willingness to attend
the awarding ceremonies if selected.

5. All pertinent documents (accomplished DA-OAS Forms 1 and 2 and supporting

documents) should be received on or before the set deadline and submitted to the Gawad
Saka - National Secretariat.

VI. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

1. Notarized Nomination Form (DA-OAS Form 1)

2. Nominee’s curriculum vitae (DA-OAS Form 2)

3. Three (3) copies of the nominee’s picture (2” X 2”) with six (6) photocopies of
accomplished nomination form and curriculum vitae

4. Hard copy and electronic copy of scrapbook (all pertinent documents supporting the
claims in DA-OAS Form 2)

VII. EVALUATION CRITERIA

A. Quality of Scientific Work 30%

B. Productivity of the Scientist 20%
C. Creativity of the Scientist 25%
D. Impact of research project(s) output 25%
Total 100%

Outstanding Agricultural Scientist

 DA-OAS Form 1
VIII. NOMINATION FORMS

GAWAD SAKA SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING AGRICULTURAL SCIENTIST

I. QUALIFICATIONS

a. The award shall be given to one who has done outstanding basic and applied research
work in agriculture/fisheries.
b. Must be a Filipino citizen
c. Must have earned a Bachelor’s and Master’s degree or higher in agriculture/fisheries or
other related field
d. Must have been a program/project leader of agriculture/fisheries-related projects(s)
e. Nominee should be in active service in a local research implementing institution during
the nomination period
f. Previous awardees are no longer qualified

II. CRITERIA

Selection will be based on the following criteria:

a. Quality of scientific work 30%

b. Productivity of the scientist 20%

c. Creativity of the scientist 25%

d. Impact of research project(s) output 25%

Total 100%

III. NOMINATION PROCEDURES

a. Applicants must be nominated by their respective agency heads. The nominator can
endorse only one candidate.
b. The regional nominee shall be endorsed by respective DA RFO Regional Executive
Director (RED) to the Gawad Saka - National Secretariat.
c. The prescribed DA nomination form (DA-OAS Form 1) must be accomplished and
notarized.
d. The nominee’s Curriculum Vitae (DA-OAS Form 2) should be submitted with the DA-
OAS Form 1 including three (3) copies of the nominee’s picture (2” x 2”).
e. Six (6) copies of the accomplished Nomination Form and Curriculum Vitae along with
pertinent documents must be submitted to the Gawad Saka National Secretariat on or
before the set deadline.

Outstanding Agricultural Scientist

 DA-OAS Form 1

FOR NOMINEE:

I attest to all the facts contained in this form and give permission for the
information to be used for publication. I understand that, barring extreme circumstances,
I will be present if an interview is requested and if selected as the Outstanding
Agricultural Scientist awardee for _______. I also hereby consent that all facts contained in
this form may be independently verified as to their accuracy by the National Technical
Committee (NTC). Furthermore, I agree to the condition that if chosen as the winner, these
documents will be made part of the property of the Department of Agriculture entrusted
to the National Secretariat, DA Search for Outstanding Achievers in Agriculture and
Fisheries.

_________________________
Signature of Nominee

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ___________ day of _____________________

at ___________________________ affiant having exhibited to me his Residence Certificate
No. ____________________ issued at ______________________________ on _____________________.

_________________________
Notary Public

Doc. No. ________ Until _________

Page No. ________ PTR No. _________
Book No. ________ TIN _________
Series of ________

Outstanding Agricultural Scientist

 DA-OAS Form 1

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
GAWAD SAKA SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING AGRICULTURAL SCIENTIST

NOMINATION FORM

FOR NOMINATOR: Summarize in the space provided below why you believe your nominee
should be selected as the Outstanding Agricultural Scientist of ________.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nominator’s Name : _______________________________

Signature : _______________________________
Home Address : _______________________________
Phone : _______________________________
Office Address : _______________________________
Phone : _______________________________
Occupation/
Organization : _____________________________

Outstanding Agricultural Scientist

 DA-OAS Form 2

Department of Agriculture
Gawad Saka Search for Outstanding Agricultural Scientist

Nominee’s Curriculum Vitae

Instructions: Type or print answers. Please use additional sheets if necessary.

1. Name:
First Middle Family
Sex: _______________________

2. Date and place of birth:

3. Mailing address and telephone number:

4. Home address and telephone number: (if different from mailing address and telephone
number)

5. Civil status (if Married, please write name of spouse and children in space provided)
Single Married Widow/widower Separated

6. Educational background:

Name of School/ Degree/

Level Institution Course Inclusive dates Honors received
From To

Primary

Secondary

Tertiary

Graduate

Diploma

Master’s

Outstanding Agricultural Scientist

 DA-OAS Form 2
Doctorate

Post Doctorate

Non-degree course

7. Work experience (please start from most recent position. Please use additional pages if
necessary)

Position Inclusive dates Department/ Status of

From To Agency/ Office appointment

8. Field/fields of specialization. Please limit to three (3).

9. Quality of Scientific Work

a. List of all publications in journal/s related to scientific research work (start from the
most recent)

a.1. Refereed publications. Please use additional pages if necessary

Author’s last name, First name. "Title of Article." Name of Journal. Volume.
Issue (Year): Pages. Book

a.2. Non-refereed publications. Please use additional pages if necessary

Author’s last name, First name. "Title of Article." Name of Journal Volume.
Issue (Year): Pages. Book

b. Awards received related to scientific research work (start from the most recent)

Title of the Award Award-giving body Date

c. Citations by other researchers

Outstanding Agricultural Scientist

 DA-OAS Form 2

10. Productivity of the Scientist

a. List of new knowledge and number of significant technologies (information, process,

products) developed/ generated. Please use additional sheets if necessary.

Year (from the Original/new Brief description Type of Intellectual

most recent) knowledge/technology Property Protection
(patent, copyright,
trademark, trade
secret, utility model,
etc)

b. List of projects conducted.

Year (from the most recent) Title Brief description

c. Amount of research grants and/or scientific resources generated.

Year (from the most Project title Amount/value Source

recent)

d. Participation in scientific, technology conference/symposium/seminar/workshop/

forum. Use additional sheets if necessary

Year/ place Title of paper Title of forum/ Role (paper

(from the presented conference/ symposium presentor/ plenary
most recent) speaker/ resource
person)

e. Other scientific activities

Year/ place Title of activity Role (paper/proposal

(from the most evaluator/reviewer/technical
recent) expert)

Outstanding Agricultural Scientist

 DA-OAS Form 2

11. Creativity of the Scientist

a. Describe the originality of your work in terms of:

1) type of scientific research done

2) type of scientific research method developed and utilized

b. Membership in professional organizations. Use additional sheets if necessary

Position Name of institution/ Period (start from most

organization recent)

c. Membership in civic organizations. Use additional sheets if necessary

Position Name of institution/ Period (start from most

organization recent)

12. Assessment of the importance of scientific contributions of the nominee to agriculture

and society

Specify technology/ies and information generated and the extent of its adoption and
utilization. Further elaborate the economic importance or value of the scientific
achievements (please limit to 1,000 words)

I hereby certify to the correctness of the data presented herein.

Signature of nominee over printed name

Date

Outstanding Agricultural Scientist

 ANNEX 26. Agricultural
Researcher

Outstanding Agricultural Researcher

 DA-OAR Form 1
GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING AGRICULTURAL RESEARCHER

I. RATIONALE

The Gawad Saka is an annual search for achievers in Agriculture and Fisheries. The
activity started in 1970 with the launch of the Search for Outstanding Farmers of the Year.
Through the years, the annual search expanded to many other productive agricultural endeavors.
It aims to recognize outstanding achievers in agriculture and fisheries that represent the
stakeholders of the community-farmers, fisherfolk, farm communities, scientists and
organizations.

The Outstanding Agricultural Researcher Category gives recognition to the achievements

and contributions of DA-based researchers who are instrumental in the refinement and ultimate
application of technologies that help the development of the agriculture sector.

II. OBJECTIVES

• To recognize researchers with outstanding accomplishments in applied research in

agriculture and fisheries

• To identify outstanding researchers whose work has resulted in technology or

technologies and/or information with high impact to the lives of the Filipino farmer and
fisherfolk

• To encourage budding researchers to achieve excellence in research and development

III. SCOPE

The search provides awards for Filipino researchers who hassuccessfully demonstrated
exemplary performance in research and development in agriculture/fisheries and other related
fields.

The category is open to all DA research implementing institutions.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

a. Must be a Filipino citizen

b. Must have earned at least a Bachelor’s in agriculture/fisheries or other related field

c. Must have been a program/project leader of agriculture/fisheries-related projects(s)

d. Nominee should be in active service as a regular employee of a DA implementing

institution during the nomination period

e. Previous awardees are no longer qualified

Outstanding Agricultural Researcher

 DA-OAR Form 1
V. SEARCH RULES AND REGULATIONS

 Applicants must be nominated by their respective agency heads. The nominator can
endorse only one candidate.

 The regional nominee shall be endorsed by respective DA RFO Regional Executive

Director (RED) to the Gawad Saka - National Secretariat.

 Nominations should be made using the prescribed DA nomination form (DA-OAR

Form 1) and notarized accordingly. The accomplished nomination form should be
accompanied by the nominee’s curriculum vitae (DA-OAR Form 2).

 The nominee must sign the nomination form (DA-OAR Form 1) attesting to all facts stated
therein; giving consent to the independent verification by the National Technical
Committee (NTC) created for this purpose and indicating his/her willingness to attend
the awarding ceremonies if selected.

 All pertinent documents (accomplished DA-OAR Forms 1 and 2 and supporting

documents) should be received on or before the set deadline and submitted to the Gawad
Saka - National Secretariat.

VI. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

 Notarized Nomination Form (DA-OAR Form 1)

 Nominee’s curriculum vitae (DA-OAR Form 2)

 Three (3) copies of the nominee’s picture (2” X 2”) with six (6) copies of accomplished
nomination form and curriculum vitae

 Hard copy and electronic copy of scrapbook (all pertinent documents supporting the
claims in DA-OAR Form 2)

VII. EVALUATION CRITERIA

A. Quality of Research Work 15%

B. Productivity of the Researcher 20%
C. Creativity of the Researcher 15%
D. Impact of research project(s) output 50%
Total 100%

VIII. NOMINATION FORM

(Attached DA-OAR Form 1)
Outstanding Agricultural Researcher
 DA-OAR Form 1

GAWAD SAKA SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING AGRICULTURAL RESEARCHER

I. QUALIFICATIONS

a. The award shall be given to one who has done outstanding applied research work
in agriculture and fisheries.
b. Must be a Filipino citizen
c. Must have earned at least a Bachelor’s in Agriculture/Fisheries or other related
field
d. Must have been a program/project leader of agriculture/fisheries-related
projects(s)
e. Nominee should be in active service as a regular employee of a DA implementing
institution during the nomination period
f. Previous awardees are no longer qualified

II. CRITERIA

Selection will be based on the following criteria:

a. Quality of research work 15%

b. Productivity of the researcher 20%

c. Creativity of the researcher 15%

d. Impact of research project (s) output 50%

Total 100%

III. NOMINATION PROCEDURE

a. Applicants must be nominated by their respective agency heads. The

nominator can endorse only one candidate.
b. The regional nominee shall be endorsed by respective DA RFO Regional
Executive Director (RED) to the Gawad Saka - National Secretariat.
c. The prescribed DA nomination form (DA-OAR Form 1) must be accomplished
and notarized.
d. The nominee’s Curriculum Vitae (DA-OAR Form 2) should be submitted with
the DA-OAR Form 1 including three (3) copies of the nominee’s picture (2” x
2”).
e. Six (6) copies of the accomplished Nomination Form and Curriculum Vitae
along with pertinent documents must be submitted to the Secretariat on or
before the deadline.
Outstanding Agricultural Researcher
 DA-OAR Form 1

FOR NOMINEE:

I attest to all the facts contained in this form and give permission for the
information to be used for publication. I understand that, barring extreme
circumstances, I will be present if an interview is requested and if selected as the
Outstanding Agricultural Researcher awardee for ________. I also hereby consent
that all facts contained in this form may be independently verified as to their
accuracy by the National Technical Committee (NTC). Furthermore, I agree to the
condition that if chosen as the winner, these documents will be made part of the
property of the Department of Agriculture entrusted to the National Secretariat,
DA Search for Outstanding Achievers in Agriculture and Fisheries.

_________________________
Signature of Nominee

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ___________ day of _____________________

at ___________________________ affiant having exhibited to me his Residence
Certificate No. ____________________ issued at ______________________________ on
_____________________.

_________________________
Notary Public

Doc. No. ________ Until _________

Page No. ________ PTR No. _________
Book No. ________ TIN _________
Series of ________

Outstanding Agricultural Researcher

 DA-OAR Form 1

GAWAD SAKA SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING AGRICULTURAL RESEARCHER

NOMINATION FORM

FOR NOMINATOR: Summarize in the space provided below why you believe your
nominee should be selected as the Outstanding Agricultural
Researcher of ________.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nominator’s Name : _______________________________

Signature : _______________________________
Home Address : _______________________________
Phone : _______________________________
Office Address : _______________________________
Phone : _______________________________
Occupation/
Organization : _______________________________

Outstanding Agricultural Researcher

 DA-OAR Form 2

Department of Agriculture
Gawad Saka Search for Outstanding Agricultural Researcher

Nominee’s Curriculum Vitae

Instructions: Type or print answers. Please use additional sheets if necessary.

1. Name:
First Middle Family
Sex: _______________________

2. Date and place of birth:

3. Mailing address and telephone number:

4. Home address and telephone number: (if different from mailing address and
telephone number)

5. Civil status (if Married, please write name of spouse and children in space provided)
Single Married Widow/Widower Separated

6. Educational background:

Name of School/ Degree/

Level Institution Course Inclusive dates Honors received
From To

Primary

Secondary

Tertiary

Graduate

Outstanding Agricultural Researcher

 DA-OAR Form 2
Name of School/ Degree/
Level Institution Course Inclusive dates Honors received
From To

Diploma

Master’s

Doctorate

Post Doctorate

Non-degree course

7. Work experience (please start from most recent position. Please use additional pages
if necessary)

Position Inclusive dates Department/ Status of

From To Agency/ Office appointment2

8. Field/fields of specialization. Please limit to three (3).

9. Quality of Research Work

b. Publications in journal/books related to scientific research work (from most

recent up to the last five (5) years)

a.1. Refereed publications/books. Please use additional pages if necessary

Name of journals/books Inclusive page/pages Date published/ volume

and issue date

Outstanding Agricultural Researcher

 DA-OAR Form 2

a.2. Non-refereed publications/books. Please use additional pages if necessary

Name of journals/books Inclusive page/pages Date published/ volume

and issue date

a.3. IEC Materials

Title of IEC materials Date published/Published by

d. Awards received related to scientific research work (from most recent until five
(5) years ago)

10. Productivity of the Researcher

a. List of new knowledge & number of significant technologies developed/info

generated. From most recent up to the last five (5) years. Please use additional
sheets if necessary.

Year Title Brief description

b. List of projects conducted. From most recent up to the last five (5) years)

Year Title Brief description

c. Amount of research grants and/or research assets generated. From most recent
up to the last five (5) years

Year Project title Amount/Value Source

Outstanding Agricultural Researcher

 DA-OAR Form 2

d. Participation in scientific, technology conference/symposium and fora. From

most recent up to the last five (5) years. Use additional sheets if necessary

Year Title of forum/ Scope/ nature of Type of

conference/ event participation
symposium

11. Creativity of the Researcher

a. Describe the originality of your work in terms of:

1) type of research works done

2) type of research methods used

b. Membership in professional organizations. Use additional sheets if necessary

Position Name of institution/ Period (start from

organization most recent)

c. Membership in civic organizations. Use additional sheets if necessary

Position Name of institution/ Period (start from

organization most recent)

12. Assessment of the importance of scientific contributions of the nominee to

agriculture and society

Specify technology/ies and information generated and the extent of its adoption and
utilization. Further elaborate the economic importance or value of the scientific
achievements (please limit to 1,000 words)

Outstanding Agricultural Researcher

 DA-OAR Form 2
I hereby certify to the correctness of the data presented herein.

Signature of nominee over printed name

Date

Outstanding Agricultural Researcher

ANNEX 27. Agricultural
Extension Manager
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION MANAGER

I. RATIONALE

Agricultural Extension Managers play a vital role in the development of the agriculture and
fisheries sector, ensuring proper transfer of agricultural technologies, innovation, and
potential benefits of the agricultural interventions to the farmers and fishers of the nation.
Their main role is to ensure a facilitative, participative, and empowering leadership skills to
carry out visions and goals towards nurturing the growth of agricultural extension workers,
along with their clientele, to empower agents of change in the ever-evolving agriculture and
fishery landscape of the country.

Recognizing the need to continuously professionalize agricultural extension managers

through a performance-based incentive reward system, the DA annual Gawad Saka Search for
Outstanding Agricultural Extension Manager, is one of the categories designed to
acknowledge the Agricultural Extension Managers' exceptional leadership, dedication, hard
work, excellence, and innovations in the field of agriculture extension services. This
recognition stems from the managers' efforts and valuable contributions in the
implementation of agriculture and fisheries programs.

II. OBJECTIVES

The Search aims to recognize contributions of agricultural extension managers in promoting

professionalism and achieving excellence in the delivery of AFE programs and services in the
local government units.

Specifically, this category aims to:

1. Institutionalize a mechanism that acknowledges the hard work and dedication of
agricultural extension managers in the country;
2. Recognize and reward the deserving agricultural extension managers for their
meritorious performance in delivering AFE programs and services; and
3. Provide incentives that facilitate professional advancement and growth.

III. SCOPE

The Municipal Agricultural Officer/Municipal/City Agriculturist of the regional

winner for Outstanding Municipal/City Local Government Unit shall automatically become
the nominee for the Outstanding Agricultural Extension Manager.

III.QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

Nominees for the Outstanding Agricultural Extension Manager must possess all the following
qualifications:

1. Supervised and/or implemented agriculture and fisheries programs for at least three
(3) years upon designation;
2. Participated in the AFE learning and development programs; and
3. Active member of a SEC registered professional organization for agriculture and allied
professions i.e. regularly attends meetings/participates in activities such as
conventions.

Outstanding Agricultural Extension Manager

IV. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

1. Notarized Nomination Form (Form 1) signed by the Head of Office and DA-Regional
Banner Program Head,
2. Duly filled out Personal Data Form (Form 2), with latest 2x2 picture, verified and
certified correct by the Human Resource Officer,
3. Certification from the client regarding extension activities implemented to be attested
by the MAFC/CAFC/MFARMC/CFARMC Chair; and
4. Photocopies of all the documents and materials indicating specific involvement to
various agriculture and fisheries extension activities, meritorious contributions and
accomplishments in the field of endeavors (i.e. AF Plans, M&E Plans and Reports, special
orders, certificates, and any other related documents).

V. EVALUATION CRITERIA

There are two general criteria considered in evaluating the outstanding agricultural extension
manager, namely: management skills and technical knowledge on agriculture and fisheries
extension, and reputation in the community.
Criteria Description Weight (%)
Management Nominees’ management skills and technical knowledge
Skills and on Agriculture and Fisheries Extension. The following
Technical shall be looked into:
● Supervisory and Management Function
Knowledge on
● AF Plans Developed 50
Agriculture and ● AF Plans Implemented
Fisheries ● Monitoring and Evaluation of PPAs
Extension ● Networking and Collaboration/Alliance Building

Reputation in The nominee should have an established track record of

the community programs and projects which she/he has spearheaded
(Influence in the and undertaken that contributed to the
50
community) enhancement/improvement of living condition of the
people in the community.

Total 100%

Outstanding Agricultural Extension Manager

 Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING AGRICULTURE EXTENSION MANAGER

Name/Institution :
Address :

Province/Region :
Justification for Nomination :

Nominated by :
Signature Over Printed Name (Head of Office)
Position :
Address :

Attested by :

Signature Over Printed Name (DA-Regional Banner

Program Head)

Position :
Address :

Outstanding Agricultural Extension Manager

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

1. Name:
First Middle Family
Sex: _______________________

2. Date and place of birth:

3. Mailing address and telephone number:

4. Home address and telephone number: (if different from mailing address and
telephone number)

5. Civil status (if Married, please write name of spouse and children in space provided)
___ Single _____ Married _______Widow/Widower ______ Separated

6. Educational background:

Name of School/ Degree/

Level Institution Course Inclusive dates Honors received
From To
Primary

Secondary

Tertiary

Graduate

Diploma

Master’s

Doctorate

Post Doctorate

Non-degree course

Outstanding Agricultural Extension Manager

7. Work experience (please start from most recent position. Please use additional pages if
necessary)

Position Inclusive dates Department/ Status of

From To Agency/ Office appointment3

8. Awards/Recognition Received
Awards/Recognition Award Giving Body/Agency Year

9. Membership to Organization

Organization Position Year

________________________________________
Signature of Nominee Over Printed Name

________________________________________
Date
Attested by:

_________________________________________
(Signature of Head, Human Resource Officer)
_________________________________________

(Date)
3

Outstanding Agricultural Extension Manager

ANNEX 28. Agricultural
Extension Worker
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT
AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION WORKER

I. RATIONALE

In the context of providing agriculture and fisheries (AF) programs and services towards a
Masaganang Agrikultura at Maunlad na Ekonomiya Patungo sa Bagong Pilipinas, agricultural
extension workers (AEWs) play a vital role as frontline agents in the dissemination of relevant
AF information to farmers and fisherfolk. This includes transferring technologies, practices,
and information that helps them access essential resources such as credit, market, production
support, and business development services, among others.

The role of AEWs enables the farmers and fisherfolk in their localities to understand and
realize the steps to be undertaken to improve their productivity, resilience, and
competitiveness, which further contributes to increasing food and nutrition security and
boosting economic growth and development.

Despite challenges such as limited resources, governance issues, political concerns, and the
low prioritization of agriculture and fisheries in some areas, there is a general
acknowledgment of the unwavering commitment, hard work, and dedication of AEWs in
fulfilling their duties and serving their communities. Hence, recognizing them not only honors
their performance, success, and achievements but also motivates continued excellence and
commitment in the delivery of quality AF programs and services.

Specifically, the Gawad Saka Search for Outstanding AEW recognizes the vital contributions
of assisting AEW, particularly those who provided support and assistance to the regional
Gawad Saka farmer, livestock (animal) raisers, and fisherfolk winner/s. This highlights their
efforts, which were deemed integral to the success of the Gawad Saka winners of their locality.
The inclusion of this award also intends to incentivize AEWs and encourage the LGUs across
the country to actively participate and submit their nominees for the different Gawad Saka
categories, while showcasing their best practices and initiatives for the agriculture and
fisheries sector.

This guideline is issued to serve as a reference in the search for Outstanding AEWs from the
screening, shortlisting, and validation of nominees and later, in determining the awardees.

II. OBJECTIVES

The Search aims to recognize the valuable contributions of AEWs, as frontline agents in the
delivery of AF programs and services and in improving the productivity and empowerment
of the farmers, livestock (animal) raisers, and fisherfolk in their localities.

Specifically, this category aims to:

a. Award an AEW who has shown unwavering commitment, hard work, and dedication in
fulfilling their duties and responsibilities and contributed to the success of the regional
Gawad Saka winners; and
b. Provide incentives and benefits that invigorate their professional commitment and
dedication to the agriculture and fisheries sector.

Outstanding LGU Agricultural Extension Worker

III. SCOPE

The search for Outstanding Agricultural Extension Worker is open to all AEWs from the
City/Municipal LGUs who were tapped as Assisting Technicians covering the same period as
the regional Gawad Saka farmer, livestock (animal) raisers, fisherfolk winner/s for a given
year. These AEWs provided exemplary support, guidance, and assistance that contributed to
the success and achievements of the regional winners, as they became their region’s nominees
for the national evaluation and awarding process.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

The nominees for the Outstanding AEW must possess the following qualifications:

1. Served as the Assisting Technician for the current regional Gawad Saka farmer, livestock
(animal) raisers, fisherfolk winner/s;
2. Employed at the City/Municipal Agriculture Office, whether permanent or contractual; and
3. Has been assigned to provide support and assistance to the current regional Gawad Saka
winner/s for a minimum of two (2) years prior to their winning.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

The following documentary requirements shall be submitted for review by the NTC for
Outstanding AEW:

1. Notarized Nomination Form (Form 1);

2. Duly filled out Nominee Data Form (Form 2), with 2 latest pictures (2x2), verified and
certified correct by the DA-Regional Field Office;
3. Copy of the endorsement letter of the Regional Search Committee (RSC) signed by the
DA-Regional Executive Director;
4. A certified true copy of the service/employment record at the City/Municipal Agriculture
Office;
5. A certified true copy of the signed Special Order or any related document that the
nominee has served as the Assisting Technician for the regional Gawad Saka winner/s;
6. Any related document that shows proof that the nominee is the designated AEW assigned
to the regional Gawad Saka winner/s and shows the extent of support and assistance
provided to the regional Gawad Saka winner/s such as, but not limited to:
● Certified list of programs, projects, and activities (PPAs) assigned to the AEW, as well as
the list of farmers/livestock (animal) raisers/fisherfolk assisted (shall include the name
of the Gawad Saka winner/s) with farm location, as attested by the City/Municipal
Agriculturist;
● LGU plans and budgets/work and financial plans;
● Accomplishments/performance/monitoring reports;
● Documentations (i.e. social media postings, published articles, and success stories) of the
AEW working with the Gawad Saka winners in the field, or during the implementation of
relevant PPAs;
● Documentation of correspondence or communication between and among the AEW, the
Gawad Saka winner/s, and other AF stakeholders (i.e. emails, screenshots of messages,
official letters, etc.);
● Certified testimonies or affidavits from local officials, community and/ farmer leaders
confirming the AEW's engagements with the Gawad Saka winner/s, as well as
interaction/involvement in the community;

Outstanding LGU Agricultural Extension Worker

 7. A maximum of five (5) minute videotape showing the AEW’s activities and other relevant
information
8. Copies of all documentary requirements, scrapbooks, and other required materials
submitted for the regional Gawad Saka winner/s that were assisted by the AEW nominee.

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The criteria to be used for evaluating the nominees for the Outstanding AEW are as follows:

a. Performance Output and Innovations. This refers to the AEW's performance in

providing assistance to the regional Gawad Saka winner/s and in accomplishing assigned
PPAs focused on networking and partnership building, as well as the introduction of
innovations/new technologies to clients.

b. Effect on the Community and Clients Served. This refers to the significant contributions
of the AEW to clients, focused on satisfaction levels, adoption rates, improved
productivity, and increased income,

The details pertaining to the weighted score and indicator measures for each are presented
in Form 3.

Outstanding LGU Agricultural Extension Worker

 Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING AGRICULTURE EXTENSION WORKER

Name of Nominee: :
LGU Office
Address :
Province and Region
Justification for Nomination :

Nominated by :
Signature Over Printed Name
Position :
Address :

Outstanding Agricultural Extension Worker

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

OUTSTANDING AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION WORKER

Name: ___________________________________
Municipality: ___________________________________
Province: _______________________________________
Region: ________________________________________
Position/Designation: _______________________ 2x2 Picture
Years in the Position/Designation:__________

A. Brief Description of the Nominee

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________

B. Brief description of the meritorious assisted PPAs and/or exemplary support, guidance,
and innovations that have contributed to the success and achievements of Gawad Saka award-
winning farmers/livestock (animal) raisers/fisherfolk.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nominee :
Signature Over Printed Name
Position :
Address :

Certified Correct by:

ATI Center Director :

Signature Over Printed Name
Regional Training Center :

Outstanding Agricultural Extension Worker

 Form 3. Evaluation Form

OUTSTANDING AGRICULTURE EXTENSION WORKER

Criteria and Indicators Point Score

Distribution

A. Performance Output and Innovations (50%) - AEW's performance in providing

assistance to the regional Gawad Saka winner/s and in accomplishing assigned PPAs focused on
linkaging and partnership building, as well as the introduction of innovations/new technologies
to clients.

● Provision of technical assistance 10

● Networking, and partnership building 15
● Introduction of innovations/new technologies 25
B. Effect on the Community and Clients Served (50%) - Significant contributions of the
AEW to clients, focused on satisfaction levels, adoption rates, improved productivity, and increased
income
● Client satisfaction levels 10
● Adoption rate 10
● Increase in client productivity 20
● Increase in client income 10
TOTAL 100

Outstanding Agricultural Extension Worker

 ANNEX 29. Young
Farmer/Fisherfolk

O
 Form 1. Nomination Form

GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING YOUNG FARMER/ FISHERFOLK

I. RATIONALE

As part of the nationwide search for Gawad Saka’s outstanding farmers and fisherfolk
of the Department of Agriculture (DA), this category aims to recognize the
achievements of a young farmer and fisherfolk who has maximized the full potential
of his/her farm as an economic enterprise. The search intends to look for individuals
who have benefitted from the DA’s extension and training services and therefore have
proven that farming / fishing is a viable profession.

The nomination shall be open to a person who is directly or personally engaged in

agriculture and fisheries production, either in crop cultivation, livestock and animal
raising, fish capture and/or fish culture. He/she must be a member of a recognized
youth organization that is engaged in an agricultural enterprise.

Hence, this is the Philippine Government’s approach to inspire other youths to

appreciate and venture in agribusiness and likewise engage them in the advancement
of agriculture and fisheries in their communities.

II. OBJECTIVE

The search for outstanding young farmer/fisherfolk aims to recognize the

achievements of an individual who upon applying the modern technologies learned
from various sources/institutions, generated higher yields, thereby improving
his/her farm productivity that benefitted not only his/her family, but also the
community he/she belongs to.

III. SCOPE

This category is intended for the search for an outstanding young farmer/fisherfolk
with the following description:

● The outstanding young farmer/fisherfolk is one who is passionate about making

farming / fishing as a viable enterprise. He/She is directly or personally engaged
in crop cultivation, livestock and animal raising, fish capture and/ or fish culture,
who is not more than thirty (30) years old at the time of nomination.

● The outstanding young farmer/fisherfolk is one who has demonstrated

exceptional performance in the field of agriculture and fisheries by showcasing
his innovative practices that enhanced farm productivity while preserving the
environment.

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk

 Form 1. Nomination Form

● The outstanding young farmer/fisherfolk is one who is actively involved in their

local community, advocating for agriculture and fisheries and supporting
initiatives that benefit not only his/her family, but also the community he/she
belongs to.

● The outstanding young farmer/fisherfolk is one who effectively practices a

combination of farming enterprises, skillfully allocating his/her resources to
efficiently utilize the existing environment for agricultural productivity.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

a. The nominee must be a Filipino citizen, of good moral character certified

by the barangay chairman, not more than thirty (30) years old at the time
of nomination.
b. He/She must be utilizing a farm area of not more than five (5) hectares.
c. He/She must be a member of cooperative or any recognized
farmer/fisherfolk rural-based organizations.
d. Must be in good credit standing, if a loan borrower.
e. He/She must own/manage the enterprise himself/herself.
f. He/She has been a recipient of any of the extension and training
programs of the Department of Agriculture / registered in the RSBSA.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

a. Duly filled-out Personal Data Form (OYFF Form 1), with 2 latest pictures (2 x 2),
verified and certified correct by the Agricultural Technician/Municipal
Agriculturist/MAFC Chairman).

b. Duly filled-out nomination forms (OYFF Form II).

c. The nominee’s certificate of live birth duly certified by the Civil Registrar’s
Office.

d. Certification from the Municipal/City Mayor, Agriculturist or FDP Municipal

coordinator that the nominee is a bonafide farmer/fisherfolk actually and
personally undertaking agricultural projects of not more than five (5) hectares.

e. Proof of ownership such as title, tax declaration, contract, FLA, etc.

f. Farm layout or sketch should include the following:

i. Location of house, farm, roads, agricultural equipment/infrastructure, etc.
ii. Estimated distances (m) and area (hectares).
iii. Indicate type of crop-animal-fishery in the farm location

g. All documents and materials to be contained in the scrapbook (ex. Photocopy

of certificate of membership in youth farmer organization, trainings/seminars,

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk

 Form 1. Nomination Form

awards, certificates, community involvement to certain projects, etc.) duly

certified by the MAO and or / Mayor.

h. Income tax return (ITR) payment for the last three (3) consecutive years
immediately preceding the current year of Gawad-Saka Search. If exempted, proof
of exemption, duly certified by the BIR.

i. Farm documentation of ALL relevant photographs/photocopies of the nominee’s

enterprises. It should not be more than twenty (20) photographs (3R).

*A five (5) minute maximum videotape of the nominee’s activities and related
information shall be submitted.

j. Records/Summary of operation, expenses, yield and income for the

cropping/enterprise period.

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

There are six (7) indicators in determining the Outstanding Young Farmer/
Fisherfolk, with the corresponding weight per criterion. These are:

Criterion Percentage
a. Farm Productivity (the efficient use of agricultural inputs 20
to maximize the production of farm outputs and products.)
i. Yield / Potential Production
ii. Total Farm Production Value - Cost Ratio
iii. Innovative practices / Ability to adopt modern AF
technologies
iv. Sustainable farming practices
b. Farm Management Efficiency 20
i. Percentage of the farm being utilized
ii. Application of Modern Farm Technologies
c. Cash Flow (Income, Savings, Reinvestments) 10
i. Amount of Investments / Reinvestments
(Purchase of equipment, livestock, etc)
d. Record Keeping 5
e. Market Orientation 10
i. Income generating projects
ii. Marketing initiatives and techniques
iii. Cost saving initiatives
f. Individual Skills 20
i. Leadership Skills
ii. Interpersonal Communication Skills
g. Community Involvement 15
i. Participation / Impact / Contribution to the
Community
ii. Influence on other youths in the community

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk

 Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING YOUNG FARMER/ FISHERFOLK

Name of Nominee :
Address :

Province/Region :
Justification for :
Nomination

Nominated by :
Signature Over Printed Name
Position :
Address :

Assisting Technician :
Signature Over Printed Name

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

Recent 2x2 Picture

OUTSTANDING YOUNG FARMER/ FISHERFOLK (2 Copies)

PERSONAL DATA FORM

OUTSTANDING YOUNG FARMER/FISHERFOLK OF THE YEAR

1. Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________
(Surname) (First Name) (Middle Initial)

2. Home Address: __________________________________________________________________________

(Barangay) (Town) (Province)

3. Citizenship: _____________________ Sex: __________ Civil Status: ______________________

4. Date of Birth: ________________________ Place of Birth: ___________________________________

5. Educational Attainment:________________________________________________________________

6. Contact Address: ________________________________________________________________________

Mobile Phone No. _______________________________________________________________________
Email Address ___________________________________________________________________________

7. No. of year in farm/fishery enterprise ________________________________________________

8. Special Skills/Hobbies: _________________________________________________________________

9. Farm Location: __________________________________________________________________________

10. Tenure: Individual Owned: ______ Family-owned:_______

Leasee:______ Tenant:_______

11. Do you have a farm plan and budget/records including farm operations,
production expenses and income? ____________________________________________________

12. Farm Productivity

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

Farm Period Covered Yield Gross Income

Project/Enterprises Expenses
Crop Production
(ha)
1.
2.
3.
4.
Livestock/Poultry
1.
2.
3.
4.
Aquaculture/Marine
Fishing (kgs)
1.
2.
Others (units)
1.
2.
3.
4.

13. What is your source of capital?

14. Are there other people who are providing labor on your farm? Yes _______ No
_____

If yes,
_____ Activities Performed
_____ Number of Laborers
_____ Relationship

15. From whom/Where did you learn farming/fishing skill/technology? Enumerate

sources of information (e.g. parents, technicians, books, newspapers, magazines,
etc.)

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

16. What type of farm inputs are you using? Organic or inorganic?

17. Where do you market your produce?

18. Community Involvement

A. Membership in Organization/Association

Organization/Association ____________________________________________________________
Position __________________________________________________________________________________
Since When ______________________________________________________________________________

B. Community Participation (Describe briefly)

Name of School/Agency Institution ____________________________________________________

Year _____________________________________________________________________________________
Location __________________________________________________________________________________

Describe the nature of participation in the community and how it affects /

contributes to the development of the community.
____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

19. Awards/Certificate of Recognition Received

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

20. Trainings/Seminars Attended (title and month/year attended)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

21. Personal Assessment of Self-help and Projects

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Prepared by:

__________________________________
(Name of Nominee)

Certified Correct:
(Local Agriculturist)

Signature over Printed Name: __________________________________________________

Position/Designation: __________________________________________________________
Office: ____________________________________________________________________________

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

OUTSTANDING YOUNG FARMER/ FISHERFOLK

INDICATOR POINTS DISTRIBUTION

a. Farm Productivity 20
1. Yield/Potential Production (Annual/ha) 10
>80% volume output = 10
>60% volume output =8
>40% volume output =6
2. Total Farm Production Value – Cost Ratio 10
(Sum of Value of Commodities divide by Sum
Production Cost)
>80% volume output = 10
>60% volume output =8
>60% volume output =6
b. Farm Management Efficiency 20
1. % of the farm being utilized 7
>90% =7
>60% =5
>60% =3
2. Utilization of Farm Technologies (Application of 7
technology, soil and water management, environment
as applied to fishery, crops, livestock production)
Good (properly applied) =7
Poor (not properly applied) =5
3. Integration/Technology complementation (Integration 6
of waste-fertilizer-energy-feed.etc)
Good =6
Fair =4
Poor =2
c. Cash Flow (Income, Savings, Reinvestments) 10
1. Amount of Investments/Reinvestments (Purchase of 5
equipment livestock, etc.)
2. Return of Investment (ROI) 5
d. Record Keeping 5
e. Market Orientation 10
1. Cost saving initiatives 4
Good =4
Fair =3
Poor =1
2. Income-generating projects 3
(has other sources of income)
Good (if agriculture related) =3
Fair (If other than agriculture related) = 2
Poor =1

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

3. Marketing initiatives and techniques 3

Good =3
Fair =2
Poor =1
f. Individual Skills 20
1. Leadership 8

Good =8
Fair =6
Poor =4
2. Interpersonal Communication (oral or written) 4
Ability to establish connections with fellow farmers/
constituents in the community
Good =4
Fair =3
Poor =2
3. Extension (adoption/willing to transfer technology) 8
Ability to
Good =8
Fair =6
Poor =4
g. Impact/Contribution to the Community 15
1. Contribution to Family Income 5
2. Influence on other Youths in the Community 5
3. Participation in Community Activities 5
TOTAL 100

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk

ANNEX 30. Young
Farmer/Fisherfolk
Organization
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING YOUNG FARMER/ FISHERFOLK
ORGANIZATION (OYFFO)

I. RATIONALE

As part of the nationwide search for Gawad Saka’s outstanding farmers/fisherfolk,

this category aims to recognize the achievements of a group of young
farmers/fisherfolk who have shown exemplary contributions in the development of
their fellow farmers and fishers. The search intends to give honor to farmers and
fishers who have shown their exceptional dedication to sustainable practices,
innovation, and community engagement, committed to enhance agricultural
productivity while prioritizing environmental stewardship.

This recognition emphasizes the significance of collaborating with fellow farmers for
sharing knowledge and resources as they adopt advanced farming techniques and
promote organic practices. By leveraging technology and advocating for sustainable
policies, they not only improve their own operations but also inspire and uplift the
broader agricultural community.

With this, the nomination shall be open to any organized young farmer/ fisherfolk,
whose members are between the ages of 15 and 30 years, with active involvement in
the community and whose members are directly engaged in a single or a combination
of farming enterprises on agriculture and fisheries production, either in crop
cultivation, livestock and animal raising, fish capture and/or fish culture.

Hence, this is the Philippine Government’s approach to inspire other youths to

appreciate the role of organized groups and likewise engage them in the advancement
of agriculture and fisheries in their communities.

II. OBJECTIVE

The search for outstanding young farmer/fisherfolk organization aims to recognize

the achievements of a group of young individuals who are directly engaged in
communal and individual projects related to agriculture and fishery production,
processing, marketing, etc. that benefitted not only their own family, but also the
community they belong to.

III. SCOPE

The search shall be open to all Young Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization (YFFO), which
refers to any organized young farmer and fisherfolk group duly accredited or
registered with the DOLE, SEC, CDA, DA, LGU or any other relevant government
agency / institution. The organization must be in existence for at least three (3) years

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 prior to nomination with members of at least fifteen (15) young farmers / fisherfolk
with ages between 15 to 30 years.

a. Composed of at least 15 young farmer/fisherfolk; between 15 to 30 years of

age by the time of nomination;
b. The organization must be engaged in communal and individual projects
which encourage participatory management of resources and financial gains
from their undertakings;
c. The major activity should be directly related to single activity or combination
crops, livestock and fishery production , processing, marketing, etc;
d. The organization must be in existence for at least three (3) years prior to the
nomination;
e. The activity and projects must be in line with the Department of Agriculture’s
Thrust.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

a. The YFFO must be an active organization and duly accredited or registered

with the DOLE, SEC, CDA, DA, LGU or any other relevant government
agency/institution at the time of nomination.
b. Composed of at least 15 young farmer/fisherfolk; between 15 to 30 years of
age by the time of nomination.
c. Engaged in communal and individual projects which encourage
participatory management of resources and financial gains from their
undertakings;
d. The major activity should be directly related to single activity or
combination crops, livestock and fishery production , processing,
marketing, etc;
e. The organization must be in existence for at least three (3) years prior to the
nomination;
f. The activity and projects must be in line with the Department of
Agriculture’s Thrust.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

a. Form 1. Nomination Form;

b. Form 2. Nominee Data Form;
c. Certificate of registration;
d. Certification from the Municipal/City Mayor, Agriculturist or FDP Municipal
coordinator that the nominee is a bonafide farmer/fisherfolk actually and
personally undertaking agricultural projects of not more than five (5)
hectares;
e. Organizational chart;
f. List of present officers and members; and
g. Bank of Accounts/Financial statements for communal projects for the last 3
years to include
i. Source and amount of capital investment;
ii. Detailed expenses per activity (inputs/labor);
iii. Yield per crop; number of offspring produced per animal; yield of fish
per harvest;
iv. Sales (by crop, by kind of animal, fishery);

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 v. Net income (by crop, by animal);
vi. Income utilization; and
vii. Other relevant information.

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The set of criteria for the Search for Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk
Organization shall be:
a. Organization Management (45%)
b. Economic Activities (35%); and
c. Social Activities/Accomplishments. (20%)

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 Form 1. Nomination Form

OUTSTANDING YOUNG FARMER/ FISHERFOLK

ORGANIZATION (OYFFO)

Name/Institution :
Address :

Province/Region :
Justification for Nomination :

Nominated by :
Signature Over Printed Name
Position :
Office/ Affiliation: :
Office Address: :
Email / Phone no. :
:

Assisting Technician :
Signature Over Printed Name

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

OUTSTANDING YOUNG FARMER/FISHERFOLK ORGANIZATION

I. Organizational Profile

Name of Organization: ________________________________________________________________________

Name of the President: _______________________________________________________________________

Contact address/mobile phone no./e-mail address: _______________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Date Established/organized: _________________________________________________________________

Date Registered: _______________________________________________________________________________

Name of the Agency: ___________________________________________________________________________

(where the YFFO is registered)

List of the Officers at the time of nomination (use separate sheet): _______________________

Number of members at the time YFFO was registered: ____________________________________

Number of members at the time of nomination: ____________________________________________

List of Members at the time of nomination (indicating age at the time of nomination, sex
and main agricultural activity/Indicate whether active or inactive):
(Use separate sheet)

II. Activity Profile

NOTE: Report only communal activities, which the organization had contributed to the
investment (cash or in kind) and had gotten a share of income.

A. Income Generating Activities for the three (3) years

1. Agribusiness
1a. Number of business (Crop, livestock, fishery, service)
1b. Total Investment
1c. Total Income Generated
1d. Return on Investment (ROI)

2. Non-agribusiness
2a. Number of businesses (Cottage industry, etc.)
2b. Total Investment
2c. Total Income Generated
2d. Return on Investment (ROI)

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

B. Social Activities
1. Human Resource Development
1a. Number of activity
1b. Fund source
1c. List of Beneficiaries

2. Other Services
2a. Number of technician services rendered
2b. Number of community services rendered

C. Community Involvement
1. Activities / Projects (agri-related / non-agri-related)
2.

III. Consent/Signature of the President/Chairman or Representative of Organization

I attest to all the facts stated herein and give my consent for an interview and verification of the
facts/information mentioned.

______________________________________________
Name of President
(Signature over Printed Name)

______________________________________________
Signature

Certified Correct:

__________________________________________
AT/MA
(Signature over Printed Name)

Office: ___________________________________

Outstanding Young Farmer/Fisherfolk Organization

 Form 3. Evaluation Score Sheet

OUTSTANDING YOUNG FARMER/ FISHERFOLK

ORGANIZATION (OYFFO)

INDICATORS POINTS
DISTRIBUTED
(%)
1. Organization Management 45
a. Membership 8
– No. of active members
– Membership growth over time
b. Frequency of meeting 3
c. Affiliation with other agencies/ institutions 4
d. Scope of Activities Participated/Supported 20
d.1 Participated in Meetings Organized by DA 4
technician/extension workers
d2 Promoted utilization of indigenous resources/
techniques in farm activities 4
d.3 Participated in community service and other
development projects 4
d.4 Agricultural production activities (production,
marketing, processing, and farming activities) 8
e. Records Management 10
2. Economic Activities 35
a. Agribusiness 10
a.1 Number of Activities 6
a.2 Amount of Investment 4
b. Non-agricultural Economic Activities 5
b.1 Number of Activity 3
b.2 Amount of Investment 2
c. Return on Investment 15
c.1 Agribusiness 8
c.2 Non-agribusiness 7
d. Financing 5
3. Social Activities/Accomplishments 20
a. Human Resources Development Activities 10
b. Other Services Rendered to Members 5
c. Awards / Citation Received 5
TOTAL 100
ANNEX 31. Agricultural
Entrepreneur (Micro, Small,
Medium Enterprise)
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING AGRICULTURAL ENTREPRENEUR

I. RATIONALE
Agricultural entrepreneurship is at the frontier of the market, fundamentally transforming old
production systems or farming methods, and innovating them to meet both local and
international demands. It recognizes opportunities to introduce new products and processes, or
improved organizational methods by raising necessary resources, assembling the factors of
production, and organizing agri-fishery operations

With farmers and fisherfolks at the heart of agricultural entrepreneurship, the Department of
Agriculture (DA), through its programs, projects, and services, empowers them to become
reliable development partners not only in providing various agri-fishery commodities, but also in
envisioning a food-secure and resilient Philippines.

This environment is enabled by various policies, such as the Republic Act No. 11321, or the Sagip
Saka Act, that directs the DA to strengthen farmers and fisherfolk enterprise development
programs by establishing a comprehensive and holistic approach in the formulation,
coordination, and implementation of enterprise development initiatives. Likewise, the Republic
Act No. 8435, also known as the Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Act (AFMA), declares
that strengthening small farmers and fisherfolks, including those in groups and cooperatives, are
essential to transform the sector into a technology-based, advanced, and competitive industry.

As such, it is important to note that many agri-fishery enterprises are considered micro, small,
and medium enterprises (MSMEs), which makes them susceptible to the challenging effects of
turbulent markets. With this, the Republic Act No. 11293 or the Philippine Innovation Act,
addresses the changing needs of the consumers by placing innovation at the center of
development policies. More importantly, it provides for strengthening the position of MSMEs in
the innovation system, and deepening partnerships between these enterprises, the public and
private sector, and other stakeholders, as drivers of sustainable and inclusive economic growth.

Farmers and agri-entrepreneurs have invested in their operations not only through traditional
methods such as diversifying crops, expanding production, and striving for efficiency but also by
enhancing the value of agricultural commodities through processing, packaging, and marketing.
This dual approach ensures that agricultural products are not only abundant but also meet the
quality standards required by the market, thus increasing their competitiveness.

The Search for Outstanding Agri-entrepreneur supports the promotion of industrialization and
full employment based on sound agricultural development and agrarian reform. This is achieved
through industries that make full and efficient use of human and natural resources, ensuring
competitiveness in both domestic and foreign markets. In pursuit of these goals, all sectors of the
economy and all regions of the country are given optimum opportunities for development.

Private enterprises, including corporations, cooperatives, and similar collective organizations,

are encouraged to develop a viable and sustainable agricultural industry for the betterment of all.
By fostering collaboration and innovation within the agricultural sector, these entities contribute
significantly to the overall economic growth and stability of the nation.

Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur

II. OBJECTIVES
● To document the success stories and best practices of entrepreneurs involved in the agro-
industry and agribusiness enterprises;

● To recognize the agri-fishery enterprises on its exemplary performance in promoting

agribusiness as a viable and profitable profession;

● To showcase enterprises’ technologies and innovations applied to agricultural products

that meet world standards for competitiveness, increased productivity, sanitation and
safety, thereby increasing their contribution to economic growth, farmers income and
consumer welfare; and

● Motivate and promote farmers and agripreneurs to strive for excellence, adopt innovative
practices, and pursue entrepreneurial ventures in agriculture.

III. SCOPE
The Search for the Outstanding Entrepreneur shall be participated by all aspiring agricultural
entrepreneurs across the country who have successfully demonstrated exemplary performance
in the agricultural supply chain such as building an interconnectivity in the delivery of
agricultural produce, processing and value adding, employment generation, and making
agricultural products available and accessible to the consumers.

IV. DEFINITION OF TERMS

For this Search, the following definitions apply:

Agri-entrepreneur – refers to any single proprietorship, partnership, cooperative, corporation,

farmer’s/fisherfolk’s organization and/or association or juridical entity engaged in the
production, harvesting, processing and marketing of crops, livestock, fishery/aquatic products
for food and non-food purposes.

Agricultural commodities – cover agricultural and fishery products harvested or gathered from
agricultural areas or bodies of water used for aquaculture (AFMA, 1997).

Agribusiness Enterprises – refers to agriculture and fishery-related activities that put farmers,
fisherfolk, processors, distributors, and consumers within a system that produces, processes,
transports, markets, and distributes agricultural and fishery products. It encompasses input
production, farm and fishery operations and management, equipment and supplies
manufacturing, food/non-food processing, trading, and retailing (Agri-Agra Law)

Agro-processing – processing of raw agricultural and fishery products into semi-processed or

finished products, which include materials for the manufacture of food and/or non-food products,
pharmaceuticals, and other industrial products (AFMA, 1997).

Cooperatives – a duly registered association of at least fifteen (15) persons with a common bond
of interest who voluntarily join together to achieve a lawful, common social and economic end.

Corporation – an artificial being created by operation of law, having the right of succession and
the powers, attributes and properties expressed by authorized law or incidence to its existence.

Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur

 Entrepreneur – refers to a person who has possession of an enterprise, or venture, and assumes
significant accountability for the inherent risks and the outcome. It is an ambitious leader who
combines land, labor, and capital to create and market new goods or services.

Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprise (MSME) (Magna Carta for Small Enterprises, 2008) –
MSMEs shall be defined as any business activity or enterprise engaged in industry, agribusiness,
and/or services, whether single proprietorship, cooperative, partnership, or corporation, whose
total assets, inclusive of those arising from loans but exclusive of the land on which the particular
business entity's office, plant, and equipment are situated, must have value falling under the
following categories:

❖ Micro – not more than P3,000,000.00

❖ Small – P3,001,000.00 to P15,000.00
❖ Medium-P15,001,000.00 to P100,000,000.00

Partnership – association of 2 or more persons who act as co-owners of a business of which each
party contributes money, property or services to the organization.

Single proprietorship – owned and basically managed by one person.

V. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

To qualify for the Search for Outstanding Agri-entrepreneur, the following criteria/qualifications
should be met:

To qualify for the Search for Outstanding Agri-entrepreneur, the following

criteria/qualifications should be met:

1. The nominee must be a citizen of the country who has on-going and active agribusiness
enterprise operations;
2. The nominee must be registered in the Farmers and Fisherfolk Enterprise Development
Information System (FFEDIS);
3. Duly registered by concerned government agencies (i.e. SEC, BOI, DTI, CDA, etc.) as either
single proprietorship, partnership, corporation, cooperatives;
4. Ownership of the business or enterprise shall be 100% Filipino owned; and
5. FDA issued License-to-Operate, if food manufacturer.
6. The nominee must have a proven track record of three (3) years demonstrating growth,
profitability, and sustainability.
7. The nominee must have a positive impact on their community, contributing to job
creation, local economy improvement, food security, and community development.

VI. SEARCH RULES AND REGULATIONS

The following shall be the rules and regulations governing the Search:

1. The Search of Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur shall cover micro, small and medium
enterprise categories;

Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur

 2. Each province and independent cities shall only be allowed to nominate one (1) agri-fishery
enterprise for each Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprise categories in the Regional Search;

3. Only qualified nominees as defined in Section III – Scope and Section V- Eligibility of
Nominee and with complete scrap book and videotapes showing at least the process flow,
plant facilities/premises and finished products for 5 to 10 minutes shall be evaluated;

4. Only one (1) regional level nominee per category shall be considered for National Search
evaluation and judging;

5. All regional level nominees per category shall be eligible to compete at the National Search.
Provided, that the regional endorsement shall be signed by the Regional Executive Directors
(REDs);

6. From among all the endorsed National Level Finalists/Nominees, there shall be announced
three (3) National Level Winners which comprise one (1) for Micro, one (1) for Small, and
one (1) for Medium Enterprise;

7. The decision of the National Search Board of Judges shall be final and irrevocable; and

8. The national winner’s scrapbook, video tape and other documents submitted for evaluation
shall become the property of the Department of Agriculture.

VII. SEARCH AND EVALUATION PROCESS

National Search for Outstanding Agriculture Entrepreneur

A. The National Search Committee and the National Board of Judges shall set a deadline
for the submission of the nominations from the regional winners;

C. The National Board of Judges shall assess and evaluate the documents based on the
evaluation criteria (Section VIII) or may institute online or face-to-face interviews
among the national nominees; and

C. The National Search Panel of Judges shall declare the following:

· One (1) National Winner for Micro Enterprise
· One (1) National Winner for Small Enterprise
· One (1) National Winner for Medium Enterprise

VIII. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

A. Scrapbooks – the nominee’s scrapbook shall be prepared by the nominee himself with
the assistance of the nominating agency/person. He may also be assisted by the
concerned LGU and local search committees.

The book must have the following content and format:

Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur

 1. Table of Contents;
2. Nomination form duly filled up by the nominating officer;
3. Two (2) latest ID pictures of the owner/manager;
4. Business Profile containing brief enterprise description and history of the company,
capitalization, market information;
5. Plant description containing the management practices used in the plant,
production record, Quality Assurance System adopted;
6. ROI supported by Audited Financial Statements 3 years preceding the search;
7. Filed Income Tax Return;
8. Proof of contributions to countryside development;
9. Plant Photographs – to highlight the process flow of activities;
10. Mayor’s / Business permit;
11. FDA-issued License-to-Operate (LTO), if food manufacturer.

B. Supporting Documents

1. Endorsement Letter signed by the Provincial Agriculturist or Provincial Veterinary

Office;
2. If the business is a single proprietorship, a certification from the Barangay Chairman
that the proprietor/processor is a Filipino citizen of good character;
3. Certification from the DTI that the nominee belongs to the processor category;
4. License to Operate (LTO) issued by the Food and Drug Administration if food
manufacturer;
5. Audited Financial Statements for the last three(3) years of operations;
6. Certification from a financing institution that the processor has a good credit
standing;
7. Photocopies of all documents and materials indicating meritorious contributions and
accomplishments in the field of endeavor (e.g. community involvement in projects,
etc.); and
8. Income Tax Return for the last two (2) years duly certified by the BIR.

IX. EVALUATION CRITERIA

Ten (10) areas are considered in evaluating an outstanding Agri-entrepreneur. These are
1) Raw Material Sourcing; 2) Import Substitution; 3) Market; 4) Adoption of Quality Assurance
System; 5) Profitability; 6) Countryside Development; 7) Investment in Research and
Development; 8) Environmental Concern; 9) Linkages with the DA; and 10) Historical growth of
the enterprise.

The weight of each criterion is presented hereunder:

Maximum
Evaluator’s
Evaluation Criteria Point
Score
Scores
1. Raw Material Sourcing 15
a. Sourcing Materials 10

Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur

 Maximum
Evaluator’s
Evaluation Criteria Point
Score
Scores
Raw materials sourced from:
Owned Farm (100%) 10
Both Small Holders and Owned Farm 9
Small Holders 8
Imported or from big farms (<100%) 7
Imported or from big farms (100%) 6
b. Premium for Quality and compliance to Codes of 5
Practices/Best Practices
2. Import Substitution 5
- If 100% of raw materials are sourced locally 5
4
- If 1-25% of raw and packaging materials are
imported 3
- If 26-50% of the raw and packaging materials are
2
imported

- If 51-75% of the raw and packaging materials are 1

imported

- If 76-100% of the raw and packaging materials are

imported
3. With Existing Market 10

- Local and Export (if 50-99% of total production are 10

exported)
9
- Local and Export (if 1-49% of total production are 8
exported)

- Local only
4. Adoption of Quality Assurance System 15
[For Food]
❖ Certified GMP, GAP and GAHP (with certificate from
GMP accredited certifying bodies) 15
12
❖ Compliant or aligned with GMP, GAP and GAHP 10

❖ Applied Hygiene and Sanitation Practices 15

[For Non-Food]
❖ Adoption of 5S (at least 50% of Employees directly
involved in the production should have 5S training 12
certificate; company should have written SSOPs) 10
❖ Compliant with 5S

❖ Clean and orderly

5. Profitability (ROI) 15

Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur

 Maximum
Evaluator’s
Evaluation Criteria Point
Score
Scores
- below 5 1
5
- 6 to 10 8
10
- 11 to 15
13
- 16 to 20 15

- 21 to 25

- 26 and above
6. Social Responsibility 10
a. Employment Generation and Income Derived 5
b. Social Concern 5
- Employee’s benefits and good working conditions
- Community Service
7. Investment in Research and Development 10
a. Continuous product/process development 5
b. Market Research
- both local and international 5
3
- international 2
- local

8. Environmental Concern 10
- with workable waste disposal/containment
management system/recycling of waste (with 10
ECC)
- with workable waste disposal 8

9. Linkages and Partnership with the DA such as

participation to KADIWA Program, local and 5
international trade expositions, among others.

- Participated 20 and above activities and events

organized by the DA, attached agencies
5
- Participated 10-19 activities and events organized 4
by the DA, attached agencies 3

- 9 and below

10. Historical Growth of the Enterprise 5

TOTAL 100

Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur

 Appendix 1

X. NOMINATION FORM

BUSINESS NAME : ____________________________________________

KEY CONTACT PERSON : __________________________________________
CONTACT ADDRESS : _________________________________________
BUSINESS LOCATION : __________________________________________
PROVINCE/REGION : ___________________________________________
NATURE OF INDUSTRY : ___________________________________________
NAME OF BUYER : _________________________________________

Justification/ Reason for Nomination:

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________

Nominated By : _______________________________________________
(Name & Signature) ______________________________________________
Position : ________________________________________________
Address : _______________________________________________
Assisted by : _______________________________________________

Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur

 Appendix 2

SEARCH FOR THE OUTSTANDING AGRI-ENTREPRENEUR

XI. INFORMATION SHEET

BUSINESS PROFILE

BUSINESS NAME : _____________________________________________

KEY CONTACT PERSON : _____________________________________________
CONTACT ADDRESS : __________________________________________
BUSINESS LOCATION : _________________________________________
PROVINCE/REGION : __________________________________________
NATURE OF INDUSTRY : ___________________________________________
NAME OF BUYER : ___________________________________________

A. Brief Description and History of Business

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________

B. Agricultural Commodities Processed:

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

C. Capitalization ___________Micro__________Small __________Medium

D. Market
Market Destination % Share Product Line
Domestic:

Export:

E. Buyers
Name Classification

Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur

 Appendix 3

SEARCH FOR THE OUTSTANDING AGRI-ENTREPRENEUR

DESK EVALUATION/FIELD VALIDATION

BUSINESS NAME : __________________________________________

KEY CONTACT PERSON : _________________________________________

Maximum Point Evaluator's

EVALUATION CRITERIA
Scores Score
1. Raw Material Sourcing 15
a. Sourcing Materials
Raw materials sourced from:
Owned Farm (100%) 10
Both Small Holders and Owned Farm 9
Small Holders 8
Imported or from big farms (<100%) 7
Imported or from big farms (100%) 6
b. Premium for Quality and compliance to Codes 5
of Practices/Best Practices
2. Import Substitution 5
- If 100% of raw materials are sourced locally 5
- If 1-25% of raw and packaging materials are
4
imported
- If 26-50% of the raw and packaging materials
3
are imported
- If 51-75% of the raw and packaging materials
2
are imported
- If 76-100% of the raw and packaging materials
1
are imported
3. With Existing Market 10
- Export only 10
- Local and Export (if 50-99% of total production
9
are exported)
- Local and Export (if 1-49% of total production
8
are exported)
- Local only 7
4. Adoption of Quality Assurance System) 15
[For Food]
❖ Certified GMP, GAP and GAHP ( with
certificate from GMP accredited certifying 15
bodies)
❖ Compliant or aligned with GMP, GAP and 12
GAHP
❖ Applied Hygiene and Sanitation Practices 10

Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur

 [For Non-Food]
❖ Adoption of 5S (at least 50% of Employees
directly involved in the production should 15
have 5S training certificate; company should
have written SSOPs)
❖ Compliant with 5S 12
❖ Clean and orderly 10

CONTACT ADDRESS : __________________________________________

Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur

 SEARCH FOR THE OUTSTANDING AGRI-ENTREPRENEUR
DESK EVALUATION/FIELD VALIDATION
BUSINESS NAME : __________________________________________
KEY CONTACT PERSON : _________________________________________
CONTACT ADDRESS : __________________________________________
BUSINESS LOCATION : __________________________________________
NATURE OF INDUSTRY : __________________________________________

5. Profitability (ROI) 15
- below 5 1
- 6 to 10 5
- 11 to 15 8
- 16 to 20 10
- 21 to 25 13
- 26 and above 15
6. Countryside Development 10
a. Employment Generation and Income Derived 5
b. Social Concern 5
- Employee’s benefits and good working
conditions
- Community Service
7. Investment in Research and Development 10
a. Continuous product/process development 5
b. Market Research
- both local and international 5
- international 3
- local 2
8. Environmental Concern 10
- with workable waste disposal/ containment 10
management system/recycling of waste
(with ECC)
- with workable waste disposal 8
9. Linkages with Government and Private 5
Sector
10. Historical Growth of the Enterprise 5

TOTAL 100
Evaluated/Validated by : _______________________________________

Outstanding Agricultural Entrepreneur

ANNEX 32. Rural Financial
Institution
(Bank and Non-Bank)
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING PARTNER RURAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

I. RATIONALE

The Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Credit Policy Council (DA-ACPC)

promotes greater access to financial services for small farmers and fisherfolk (SFF),
young agripreneurs, rural women, farmer and fisherfolk organizations (FFOs) and
agrifishery-based micro & small enterprises (MSEs) through the advocacy of credit
policies and innovative financing schemes and programs that fit the specific
requirements of these sectors, thereby enabling them to better contribute to sustained
rural economic growth.
The development and implementation of agri-fishery financing schemes by DA-ACPC
is guided by the provisions of R.A. 8435 of 1997 or the Agriculture and Fisheries
Modernization Act (AFMA), which provides for the establishment and implementation
of the Agro-Industry Modernization Credit and Financing Program (AMCFP). The
AMCFP serves as the government’s umbrella financing program for the agriculture and
fisheries sector and implementation of the AMCFP is overseen by the DA-ACPC. Among
the policy principles of the AMCFP is the implementation of credit through qualified
financial institutions, such as rural banks, cooperative banks, and viable non-bank
financial institutions. These Partner Rural Financial Institutions (PRFIs) evaluate
eligible borrowers, approve loan applications, and manage loan repayments.
The active participation of banks and non-bank rural financial institutions is therefore
an important contributor to the success of DA-ACPC financing schemes and programs,
especially in reaching underserved areas and sectors. By helping facilitate access to
credit and other financial services for SFFs, young agripreneurs, rural women, and
MSEs, these PRFIs are also able to contribute to food security, to rural economic
growth, and to rural poverty alleviation.
Recognizing and rewarding the outstanding bank and non-bank PRFIs acknowledges
their vital contribution to the economy and encourages continued excellence in
serving the financial needs of rural communities.

II. OBJECTIVES

a. To give recognition to the outstanding performance of bank and nonbank rural finance
institutions in supporting and implementing DA-ACPC agri-fishery financing programs;

b. To give recognition to the outstanding support in enhancing access to financing for small
farmers & fisherfolk, agri fishery-based micro and small enterprises and the underserved
sectors through the provision of financial services and financial literacy building
activities;

c. To give recognition to the contribution in empowering the underserved sectors in rural

areas by providing financial services and financial literacy building activities to agrarian

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 reform beneficiaries (ARBs), rural women, young agripreneurs, and farmers and
fisherfolk from indigenous communities, thereby contributing to financial inclusion;

d. To incentivize rural financial institutions, including banks in compliance with Republic

Act 11901 (“The Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development Financing Enhancement
Act of 2022"), encourage more active participation in providing financial services for the
agri-fishery sector as well as in other government programs and projects, and continually
improve and sustain excellence in their performance;

e. To highlight and inform the public on the vital role of PRFIs in the development of the
agriculture and fisheries sector and rural communities; and

f. To promote adoption or replication of innovative and best practices in providing financial

services to the agriculture and fishery sectors.

III. DEFINITION OF TERMS

Bank refers to a financial institution licensed to provide a range of financial services,

primarily focused on accepting deposits, providing loans, and facilitating payments.
Banks play a crucial role in the financial system and economy by intermediating
between those with surplus funds (depositors) and those in need of funds (borrowers).
Key functions of a bank include accepting deposits, providing loans and credit,
payment services, safeguarding assets, investment services, currency exchange. Banks
can be categorized into several types, such as commercial banks, investment banks,
central banks, and retail banks. They are typically heavily regulated by the Bangko
Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) to ensure financial stability and protect consumers.
Financial product or service refers to products or services which are developed or
marketed by a financial service provider which may include, but not limited to, savings,
deposits, credit, insurance, pre-need and health maintenance organization (“HMO”)
products, securities, investments, payments, remittances and other equivalent
products and services. It includes digital financial products or services which pertain
to the broad range of financial services accessed and delivery through digital channels
(Republic Act No. 11765, otherwise known as the Philippine Financial Products and
Services Consumer Protection Act (“FCPA”)).

Micro enterprises are duly registered enterprises engaged in agri-fishery-based

activities with asset size of up to Php3 million1

Non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) refer to financial institutions that provide

various financial services but do not hold a full banking license. Unlike banks, non-
banks cannot accept deposits from the public. Instead, NBFIs do facilitate alternative
financial activities, such as lending, money transfers, foreign exchange, investment
services, and payment processing. NBFIs are a source of consumer credit along with
the banks. Examples of NBFIs include financing companies, pawnshops, money service
1Per Section 3 of R.A. 9501 or the ‘Magna Carta for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)’ of
2008.

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 businesses, insurance companies, investment firms, credit cooperative, among others.
These entities are typically regulated by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) or other
relevant government agencies depending on their specific activities.
Partner Rural Financial Institutions (PRFIs) are duly registered farmer and fisher
cooperatives/associations, rural banks, cooperative banks, and non-government
organizations that serve as DA-ACPC’s lending conduits in the implementation of its
innovative credit programs for SFF, FFOs, and agri-fishery-based MSEs.

Rural women are defined as (i) female members of households of small farmers and
fisherfolk (SFF); or (ii) women in indigenous groups; particularly those engaged in
agri-fishery activities.

Small enterprises are duly registered enterprises engaged in agri-fishery-based

activities with asset size from Php3 million up to Php15 million.

Small Farmers refer to “natural person dependent on small-scale subsistence farming

as primary source of income” (Section 4, RA 8435/AFMA) and as one who: (a) own or
are still amortizing lands that are not more than three (3) hectares, tenants,
leaseholders, and stewards (Presidential AO No. 21 of 2011, Revised IRR of RA
8425/Social Reform Act); or (b) engaged in backyard livestock and poultry raising
defined by Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) as engaged in: exceeding (i) for
livestock raising: 20 heads of adults and zero young, 40 heads of young animals, and
10 heads of adults and 22 heads of young animals; and (ii) for poultry raising: 500
layers or 1,000 broilers, 100 layers and 100 broilers if raised in combination, and 100
heads of duck. Small farmers also include farm workers. A farm worker refers to a
natural person who renders service for value as employee or laborer in an agricultural
enterprise or farm regardless of whether his compensation is paid on a daily, weekly,
monthly, or "pakyaw" basis and including regular or seasonal farm worker.

Small Fisherfolk refers to natural persons who are dependent on small-scale fishing
activities as a primary source of income, i.e., those: (a) directly or indirectly engaged
in taking, culturing, or processing fishery or aquatic resources; (b) those engaged in
fishing using gears that do not require boats or boats less than three (3) tons, in
municipal waters, coastal and marine areas; (c) workers in commercial fishing and
aquaculture; (d) vendors and processors of fish and coastal products; (e) subsistence
producers such as shell-gatherers, managers, and producers of mangrove resources,
and other related producers.

Young agripreneurs are defined as those (i) aged 18-30 years old, with (ii) either
formal or non-formal agri-fishery schooling or training, and (iii) engaged in agri or
fishery livelihood project/s.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

1. The bank and non-bank PRFIs must be active partners of DA-ACPC for the last two (2)
years prior to the contest year.

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 2. The bank and non-bank PRFIs must have good credit standing.

3. All ACPC Borrowers must be registered in the Registry System for Basic Sector in
Agriculture (RSBSA) and in Farmers and Fisherfolk Enterprise Development. Information
System (FFEDIS).

4. The bank and non-bank PRFIs must have approved lending guidelines that align with the
Agricultural Credit Policy Council (ACPC) credit programs. These guidelines should detail
the criteria, processes, and terms for implementing the loans, ensuring compliance with
ACPC programs guidelines.

5. The bank and non-bank PRFIs must have a record of never having any funds returned,
demonstrating its ability to efficiently manage and disburse allocated resources.

V. SEARCH AND EVALUATION PROCESS

1. The DA Regional Field Office (DA-RFO) shall establish a Regional Search and Evaluation
Committee.2 This committee will be responsible for overseeing the search, selection, of
their respective regional nominees for outstanding bank and non-bank financial
institutions. The committee must ensure that the selection process is thorough, fair, and
in line with the established criteria.

2. The regional nominees will be officially endorsed by the DA-RFO to the Gawad Saka
National Executive Committee (NEC) for consideration in the National Search for
Outstanding Bank and Non-Bank Partner Rural Financial Institutions (PRFIs). In
instances where a PRFI serves multiple regions, the endorsement will originate from the
region in which the PRFI's Head Office is located.

3. The DA-RFOs through the technical assistant shall help the nominated candidates prepare
their scrapbook containing all documentary requirements (outline attached). This
scrapbook must be submitted to the DA-Gawad Saka National Executive Committee (NEC)
within the prescribed deadline. Late submissions will not be entertained under any
circumstances, ensuring fairness and adherence to the established timeline.

4. The National Technical Committee (NTC) will conduct a comprehensive desk evaluation
of the scrapbooks submitted by the nominees, based on the outlined evaluation criteria.
Following this evaluation, all nominees garnering a rating/score of at least 85% shall be
shortlisted for on-site validation.

5. After completing the desk evaluation and conducting field validation of the shortlisted
nominees, the NTC will deliberate on the final ranking of the candidates. These rankings
will be prepared for endorsement to the Board of Judges (BOJ).

2
The DA-RFO may consider the structure of the Regional Facilitation Teams (RLoFTs) in creating the
Regional Search and Evaluation Committee. The RLoFTs were created to oversee the regional
implementation of credit programs of the DA. The RLoFT is headed by the DA Regional –Technical
Director. The DA-RED is assisted by the Regional Agri Credit Desk Officer (RACDO).

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 6. The BOJ shall review the NTC' s evaluation and deliberate on the ranking of the finalists.
The BOJ’s decision is conclusive, final, and irrevocable, representing the ultimate
judgment in the selection process.

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The nominees who met the minimum qualifications shall be evaluated based on the following
criteria:

CRITERIA POINTS
A. Support to the implementation of DA-ACPC agri-fishery financing 32
programs
• Transferred funds are fully disbursed within ACPC’s 90-day 12
reglementary period for loan release

➢ Average % disbursed within 90 days reglementary period

100% = 12 pts
90% – 99% = 9 pts
80% – 89% = 8 pts….

• Timely submission/uploading of complete Loan Disbursement 8

Reports (LDRs) to the DA-ACPC Agri Credit Electronic Portal (ACE
Portal)

➢ Average % uploaded within 30 days from disbursement

100% = 8 pts
90% – 99% = 6 pts
80% – 89% = 4 pts
60% – 79% = 2 pts
50% – 69% = 1 pt

• Collection and Remittance 10

- 100% of collections received from end borrowers remitted to DA- 2
ACPC

➢ Average % collected and remitted to ACPC

100% = 2 pts
80% – 99% = 1 pt

- Repayment Rate (not lower than 85%) except for the Survival and 3
Recovery (SURE) Assistance Program.

96% – 100% 3 pts

91% – 95% 2 pts
85% – 90% 1 pt

- Past Due Ratio (not more than 25% for ACPC credit programs 3
except the Survival and Recovery (SURE) Assistance Program)

0 past due 3 pts

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 1-10 2 pts
11-25 1 pt
26 and above 0 pt

- No subrogated accounts under the various ACPC credit programs 2

No subrogated accounts 2 pts

With subrogated accounts 0 pt

• Enrollment of SFF Borrowers in PCIC Insurance 2

With 80% and above - 2.0 pts

70% to 79% - 1.5 pts
60% to 69% - 1.0 pts
50% to 59% - 0.5 pts
Below 50% -0

• Participation in all DA-ACPC credit programs (except SURE program) 2

ACPC Programs: ANYO-SFF, ANYO-MSE, KAYA, Agri-Pinay

Participated in All Programs 2.0 pts
Participated in 3 Programs 1.5 pts
Participated in 2 Programs 1.0 pts
Participated in 1 Programs 0.5 pts

B. Enhancing access to financing for small farmers & fisherfolk, agri- 33

fishery-based micro and small enterprises;
• Percentage of Total Agricultural Loans to Total Loan Portfolio 5

50% and above 5 pts

40% - 49% 4 pts
30% - 39% 3 pts
20% - 29% 2 pts
Below 20% 1 pt

For Non-bank 2
• Presence in/coverage of unbanked municipalities based on BSP List
of unbanked municipalities
With unbanked areas 2 pt
Without unbanked areas 0 pt
For Bank
• Compliance to Agri-Agra Law 2 pt

• Number of additional municipalities served 4

4 and above additional municipalities 4 pts

3 additional municipalities 3 pts
2 additional municipalities 2 pts
1 additional municipality 1 pt

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 • Increase in number of SFF clients served 4

20% increase and above 4 pts

10% – 19% 3 pts
5% – 9% 2 pts
1% – 4% 1 pt

• Increase in number of agri-fishery-based MSEs served 4

20% increase and above 4 pts

15% – 19% 3 pts
10% – 14% 2 pts
1% – 9% 1 pt

• Number of startups agri-fishery-based businesses financed 4

5 and above 4 pts

3 - 4 start-up 3 pts
1 - 2 start-up 2 pts

• Level of Agribusiness Activity - must have diverse agricultural loan 6

portfolio and services (diversity in types of agri-fishery activity
financed, by type of borrowers, by commodity)

No. of agricultural value-chain activities financed

(production, post-harvest handling, processing, and marketing)
With 3 – 4 Activities 3 pts
With 2 Activities 2 pts
With 1 Activity 1 pt

• Diversity of agricultural sectors served

(farming, fisheries, poultry, livestock)
With 3 or more sectors served 3 pts
With 2 sectors served 2 pts
With 1 sector served 1 pt

• No. of financial services provided 4

No. of financial services

(e.g., insurance, savings, credit, etc.)
With 4 Activities 4 pts
With 3 Activities 3 pts
With 2 Activities 2 pts
With 1 Activity 1 pt

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 C. Empowerment of small farmers and fisherfolk as well as 18
underserved sectors (agrarian reform beneficiaries (ARBs), rural
women, young agripreneurs, and farmers and fisherfolk from
indigenous communities) through financial inclusion
• Number of ARBs, rural women, young agripreneurs, and indigenous 13
peoples (IP) clients (including loans)

At least 5 IP 3 pts
5 and above Young Agripreneurs 3 pts
- 1 – 4 Young Agripreneurs 1 pts
40% and above of borrowers are Rural Women 4 pts
- 20% – 39% of borrowers are Rural Women 2 pts
10% and above of borrowers are ARBs 3 pts
- 5% – 1% of borrowers are ARBs 1 pts

• Number of financial literacy building activities 5

5 or more Activities 5 pts

4 Activities 4 pts
3 Activities 3 pts
2 Activities 2 pts
1 Activity 1 pt

D. Adoption of innovative and best practices in providing financial 17

services to the agriculture and fishery sectors
• Must have demonstrated innovative lending practices and strategies 8
in implementing agricultural credit programs

With innovative lending practices 4 pts

With innovative collection strategies 4 pts

Innovative credit scheme refers to a creative financial service

designed to provide credit or loans to individuals or businesses,
particularly those who may have limited access to traditional
financing options. These schemes often incorporate new technologies,
alternative assessment methods, or unconventional structures to
improve financial inclusion, reduce risk, and make credit more
accessible and affordable.
• Implemented Community Service Projects/Programs 5

Implemented 3 or more community service projects/programs (e.g.,

medical, educational, etc.) = 3 pts

Participated in the implementation of the Survival and Recovery

(SURE) program = 2 pts

• Awards/Recognition Received 2

Received at least 2 awards/citation = 2 pts

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 Note: National awards = 2 pts.

• With a three- or five-year corporate strategic plan for the 2

agricultural sector beyond the two-year evaluation period.

VII. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

The following documents shall be prepared and submitted by the nominated PRFI to DA-ACPC
for the period 2023-2024:
1. Duly filled-up information sheet Recommendation letter from the following:
• DA-RFO
• Municipal Agriculture Office/Provincial Agriculture Office/City Agriculture Office
(MAO/PAO/CAO)
2. Audited financial statement for the past 2 years
3. Approved Lending Guidelines for ACPC Programs
4. Organizational Strategic Plans and Programs for the next 3 years
5. Agricultural loans granted for the past 2 years (total agri loan portfolio i.e. own funds
against ACPC funds)
6. Summary profile of members’ report of members with the following information:
• By sex
• By occupation (e.g. farmer or fisher)
• By type of project

7. Summary Report on the Following:

A. Funds Transferred
- Amount Transferred
- Date Transferred
B. Loan Releases
- Total Amount of Loans Granted
- Date/s Released or Disbursed
- No. of Borrowers
- Date uploaded to ACE Portal

8. Summary Report on the Following:

A. List of Borrowers (Names, Date/s of Loans Granted, Amount of Loans, Types of
Projects Financed, Types of Commodities)
B. Date/s Uploaded in the ACE Portal

9. Summary Report on the Following (by fund source):

- Total Loans Granted
- Total Loans Outstanding

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 - Total Loans Matured
- Total Loans Collected
- Amount Remitted to ACPC
- Date/s Remitted to ACPC
- Total Past Due
- Amount Subrogated

10. List of Borrowers with RSBSA or FFEDIS Number

11. List of borrowers under the SURE Program covering the 2-year evaluation period
12. List of Municipalities Served
13. No. of Municipalities served for the past 2 years
14. Number of borrowers for the past 2 years (by type of borrowers, by program)
15. List of first-time borrowers to formal institution (by type of borrower)
16. Total loans granted (by activity/type of borrowers, by Program)
17. Maximum of five (5) minutes videotape presentation about the PRFI, its activities and
other relevant information

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 Form 1. Nomination Form

GAWAD SAKA SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING

PARTNER RURAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Name/Institution :

Address :

Province/Region :

Justification for Nomination :

Nominated by :

Signature Over Printed Name

Position :

Address :

Assisting Technician :

Signature Over Printed Name

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 Form 2. Nominee Data Form

GAWAD SAKA SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING

PARTNER RURAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

INFORMATION SHEET

I. Organizational Profile

1. Name of Organization: ______________________________________________________________

2. Name of the President/Chairman: __________________________________________________
3. Contact details:
a. Address: _____________________________________________
b. mobile phone no.: ___________________________________
c. e-mail address: ______________________________________
4. Date Established/organized: __________________________________________________________
5. Date Registered: ________________________________________________________________________
6. Name of Registering Agency: ____________________________________________________
7. Number of members (by Category):
Before Joining the
Program Year End 2023 Year End 2024
Type of Member
(Year ________)
Farmers
Fisherfolk
MSE/Entrepreneurs
Employee
Others, specify

8. List of Municipalities Served

Year 2023 Year 2023

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

II. Activity Profile

A. Implementation of DA-ACPC Agri-Fishery Financing Program

1. Transferred Funds and Loan Releases (Appendix A)
1a. Amount Transfer
1b. Date Transfer
1c. Total Loans Released
1d. No. of Borrowers
1e. Date/s Released
1f. Date uploaded to ACPC Portal

2. List of Borrowers by Program (Appendix B)

2a. Name of Borrower
2b. Amount of Loans
2c. Date Granted
2d. Type of Project Financed
2e. Type of Commodity
2f. RSBSA No./FFEDIS No.

3. Summary of Performance/Status of Funds (Appendix C and D)

3a. Total Loans Granted
3b. Total Loans Outstanding
3c. Total Loans Matured
3d. Total Loans Collected
3e. Total Amount of PastDue
3f. Total Amount Subrogated
3g. Repayment Rate
3h. Past Due Ratio

B. Enhancing Access to Agricultural Financing (Appendix E)

1. Total Loans Granted
1a. Total Loans Granted by Type of Loan
- Agricultural Loan
- Commercial Loan
- Salary Loan
- Micro-Finance Loan
- Others (Housing, Educational, Personal, Emergency, etc.)
1b. Number of Borrowers by Type of Loan
- Agricultural Loan
- Commercial Loan
- Salary Loan
- Micro-Finance Loan
- Others (Housing, Educational, Personal, Emergency, etc.)
2. Total Loans Granted by Fund Source (Appendix E)
2a. Total Loans Granted by Source of Funds

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 - Own Funds
- ACPC
- Others, specify
2b. Number of Borrowers by Type of Loan
- Own Funds
- ACPC
- Others, specify

III. Innovation and Best practices

a. Objective:
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
b. Target Clients:
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
c. Description of Scheme:
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
d. Date Started :
________________________________________________________________________________________________
e. Number of Beneficiaries:
________________________________________________________________________________________________
f. Impact:
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________

IV. Activities and Recognition

1. Human Resource Development
1a. Name of activity
1b. Fund source
1c. List of Beneficiaries

2. Community Services
2a. List community services rendered
2b. Number of SFF Beneficiaries/Recipient

3. Awards and Recognition

3a. List awards/recognition received
2b. Award giving body/institution

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 V. Consent / signature of the President / Chairman or Representative of the
Organization

I attest to all the facts stated herein and give my consent for an interview and
verification of the facts / information mentioned.

_____________________________
Name of President
(In Print)

_____________________________
Signature

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 Appendix A

Summary of Funds Transferred and Loans Releases

For the Year 2023 to 2024

Date uploaded
Date Amount Total Loans Date/s No. of
on the ACPC
Transferred Transferred Released Released* Borrowers
Portal
Fund 1

Fund 2

Fund 3

• Indicate period covered in releasing the funds.

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 Appendix B

List of Borrowers
For the Year 2023 to 2024

Amount RSBSA
Name of Type of Date Type of Type of
of Loan No./FFEDIS
Borrower Program Granted Project Commodity
Granted No.

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 Appendix C

Summary Report on Status of Funds

For the Year 2023 to 2024

2024 2023

ACPC FUNDS

Total Loans Granted (for the year)

Total Loans Outstanding (As of year-end)

Total Loans Matured

Total Loans Collected

Total Amount of Past Due

Total Amount Subrogated

Repayment Rate

Past Due Ratio

OTHER FUNDS

Total Loans Granted (for the year)

Total Loans Outstanding (As of year-end)

Total Loans Matured

Total Loans Collected

Total Amount of Past Due

Total Amount Subrogated

Repayment Rate

Past Due Ratio

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

 Appendix E

Summary of Loans Granted, by Type of Loans, by Source

For the Year 2023 to 2024

2024 2023

Amount No. Amount No.

By Type of Loans

- Agriculture

- Commercial

- Micro-Finance

- Salary

- Others, specify1 _________________

- Others, specify2 _________________

- Others, specify3 _________________

- Others, specify4 _________________

By Type of Loans

- Own Funds

- ACPC

- Others, specify1 _________________

- Others, specify1 _________________

- Others, specify1 _________________

Outstanding Rural Financial Institution

ANNEX 33. Rural Women
 GAWAD SAKA
SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING RURAL WOMEN

I. RATIONALE

The Department of Agriculture (DA) is one with the member countries of the United
Nations (UN) in recognizing the important role of rural women and their valuable
contributions to society.

Based on the report of the UN-International Labour Organization, rural women comprise
a quarter of the world’s population. They work as farmers, fisherfolk, wage earners and
entrepreneurs despite having less access to agricultural/fishery assets, education and
markets compared to men. If only rural women have the same access as their male
counterparts, agricultural/fishery production could significantly increase.

Hence, the DA launched the Search for Outstanding Rural Women (SORW) in 2003. This
is in line with the gender mainstreaming of DA policies, plans, and programs pursuant to
Republic Act 9710, otherwise known as the Magna Carta of Women (MCW). Since then,
the SORW has been an annual activity of the DA Gender and Development Focal Point
System (DA GFPS).

II. OBJECTIVES

1. To give due recognition to rural women who have shown excellence and made
outstanding accomplishments in developing agriculture and fishery sector that made
significant impacts on the lives of the people in rural areas.

2. To document and publicize the success stories and accomplishments of the awardees to
serve as inspiration and model of women empowerment.

III. SCOPE

The SORW is open to all Filipino rural women who are non-government employees,
currently engaged in agriculture and fisheries and have created positive impacts on the
lives of the people in the rural community.

IV. QUALIFICATION OF NOMINEES

1. The nominee must be a Bonafide resident of a rural area, and is engaged in any
agriculture and/or fishery-based activities for at least two (2) years;

2. Shet must belong to the small farmer and/or fisherfolk (SFF) and/or small entrepreneur
category, with no more than three (3) hectares of land ownership and asset of no more
than P15million, including those arising from loans, but exclusive of the land where the
agriculture and/or fishery-based activities is situated;

3. She must be registered with any of the following Registry Systems:

a. Registry System for Basic Sector in Agriculture (RSBSA)
b. National Program for Municipal Fisherfolk Registration (FishR)
c. National Coconut farmers Registry System (NCFRS)

Outstanding Rural Women

 d. Farmers and Fisherfolk Enterprise Development Information System (FFEDIS)
e. Intensified research0based entreprise build-up (iREB)

4. She must not be a government employee (whether permanent or contractual), from the
national government or local government unit (LGU);

5. She must not be related by affinity or consanguinity with any current elected official in
the LGU, and heads of the DA offices (Assistant Director level and up) up to second
degree (except in IP Communities);

6. There should be no charges against her involving moral turpitude, filed or pending in
any court in the Philippines;

7. She must not be a former national winner of the DA Search for Outstanding Rural
Women or Gawad Saka.

V. DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

1. Letter of Endorsement duly signed by the DA Regional Executive Director to the NEC
Chairperson endorsing the nominee;

2. Affidavit of no pending civil or criminal case;

3. Profile of the Nominee using the prescribed template via this link:
https://bit.ly/2024SearchNomineeProfile;

4. Farm Record documenting the past two years based on records that are kept and
maintained and Means of Verification (MOV) for the computation of the gross
income, cost of production, net income, and return on expenses;

5. Success Story;

6. Video featuring the nominee and area of operation (maximum of five minutes); and

7. Powerpoint Presentation including highlights of the credentials of the nominee.

Submission of scrapbooks of the nominee is not required.

VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The nominees who met the minimum qualifications shall be evaluated based on the
following criteria:

CRITERIA POINTS
1. Contribution to Food Security/Agricultural and
30
Fishery Development
1.1 Productivity (Based on the yield of the major commodity
based on share on economic activities such as
10
crops/livestock/aquaculture/fisheries vs the average yield in
the region

Outstanding Rural Women

 1.2. Profitability of Economic Activities (Scores shall be based
10
on Return on Expenses)
1.3 Quality of Products/Services 10
2. Contribution to Sustainable Development and Use of
Climate Resilient or Environment/Women Friendly 30
Technologies
2.1 Efforts to Protect the Environment and Adapt to Climate
10
Change/Emerging Conditions
2.2 Use of Climate Resilient or Environment/Women-
10
Friendly Technologies
2.3 Adaptability and Innovativeness 10
3. Impact to Rural Women 40
3.1 Promotion of Women Empowerment and Gender
10
Equality/Equity
3.2 Leadership (if a member of different organizations, the
organization with the highest level of government unity 10
(e.g. national, regional, municipal, etc) should be the basis)
3.3 Contribution to Society 10
3.4 Contribution to the Local Economy 10
TOTAL 100

Outstanding Rural Women