wang2018
wang2018
Hui Wang, Qianhong Shen, Zengyu You, Yuxuan Su, Yang Yu, Abbas
Babapour, Fang Zhang, Di Cheng, Hui Yang
PII: S0167-577X(18)30044-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.01.037
Reference: MLBLUE 23685
Please cite this article as: H. Wang, Q. Shen, Z. You, Y. Su, Y. Yu, A. Babapour, F. Zhang, D. Cheng, H. Yang,
Preparation of nanoscale-dispersed g–C3N4/graphene oxide composite photocatalyst with enhanced visible-light
photocatalytic activity, Materials Letters (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.01.037
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Preparation of nanoscale-dispersed g-C3N 4/graphene oxide composite
China 310058
through electrostatic self-assembly strategy. XRD, FT-IR, SEM, TEM, and PL were
of methylene blue (MB) under visible-light irradiation. The results show that the
nanonization of bulk g-C3N4 widens the band gap of g-C3N4 from 2.75 eV to 3.40 eV,
and the obtained CNNP exhibits an obvious blue-shift in the absorption band edge
compared with bulk g-C3N4, resulting in the weak response to visible light.
Introducing GO into CNNP can efficiently reduce the band gap to 2.55 eV, thereby
6 times higher than that over bulk g-C3N4 and CNNP samples, respectively.
Furthermore, this work also indicates that the novel CNNP could be an excellent
photocatalysis
INTRODUCTION
based photocatalysis has gained considerable attention for its diverse potential in
has become a promising visible-light photocatalyst due to its appropriate band gap
(2.7 eV) and excellent chemical/thermal stability[1, 2]. More importantly, this metal-
free semiconductor, consisting of only carbon and nitrogen, is obviously green and
C3N4 always form bulk g-C3N4 with low specific surface area, poor quantum yield
attracted more and more attentions due to its high specific surface area. Furthermore,
nano g-C3N4 with smaller size can also shorten the transfer path of photo-generated
efficiently inhibited. However, it was also found that the nanonization of bulk g-C3N4
widened the band gap of g-C3N4, leading to poor photocatalytic activity under visible-
activity when excited by UV-light. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time
property will be an interesting work. In recent years, graphene have attracted great
interest and been used to combine with other materials due to its amazing conduction
properties, high strength and toughness structure, and large specific surface area[8].
not only promote transfer and separation of photo-generated electrons and holes, but
nanocomposites were discussed. Compared with the bulk g-C3N4, CNNP can be better
photocatalytic materials with intimate interracial contact and more exposed reactive
centers. Actually, the CNNP can also be loaded on many other semiconductors with
thus providing a new idea for fabricating g-C3N4 based composite photocatalytic
materials.
Experimental
system. In detail, 5 g of melamine was placed in a 20 ml crucible with cover, and then
was put in a muffle furnace and heated to 600 ℃ for 2 h at a heating rate of 3 ℃/min.
After cooling to room temperature, the resultant light yellow agglomerates were
collected and grounded into powders for further use.[10] CNNP was prepared by a
simple disintegration-exfoliation process. In detail, 1 g of CN was added to a mixture
of concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4) (20 ml) and nitric acid (HNO3) (20 ml)
firstly.[10] The mixture was magnetically stirred and refluxed at 80 ℃ for 2 h, and
then poured into 1 L deionized water. Finally, the product was washed with deionized
certain amount of CNNP was added into the above suspension and ultrasonicated for
another hour. After that, the mixture was magnetically stirred for 12 hours. The
CNNP/GO composite photocatalyst was obtained after centrifugation and drying. As-
prepared composites with different CNNP/GO mass ratio of 2:1, 4:1 and 6:1 were
Fig.1 shows the TEM images of samples with the lamellar structures, the
uniformed CNNP was displayed after the acid etching and it showed the thin-layer
structure (Fig. 1a). As shown in Fig. 1 (c-e), the CNNP is uniformly loaded on the GO.
With increasing the content of CNNP, there are more CNNP on the GO, and it is very
The XRD patterns of the samples of CN, CNNP, GO and CNNP/GO are shown
in Fig. S2. The CN sample displays a typical feature of g-C3N4 with two peaks at
27.41° and 13.21°, corresponding to the (002) and (100) diffraction planes (JCPDS
87-1526) respectively[11]. The XRD pattern of the obtained CNNP only shows the
characteristic peak at 27.41°, suggesting that the typical layered structure of g-C3N4 is
well kept. Whereas the low angle diffraction peak at 13.21° becomes weak, because
planar size of the layers is simultaneously decreased after the intense protonation[11].
For pure GO, only a sharp diffraction peak at around 10.8° can be observed,
Fig. 2a shows the UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of CN, CNNP, and
CNNP/GO nanocomposites. Compared with CN, the absorption edge of CNNP shows
a distinct blue shift. GO modification can significantly affect the optical properties of
g-C3N4, and the absorption edge of all CNNP/GO nanocomposites occur red shift
relative to CNNP. Fig. 2b shows the plots of the transformed Kubelka-Munk function
as a function of light energy. It can be seen that the band gap of CN, CNNP,
CNNP/GO-2, CNNP/GO-4 and CNNP/GO-6 are estimated to be about 2.75 eV, 3.40
eV, 1.95 eV, 2.55 eV and 3.03 eV, respectively. According to FTIR (Fig. S3), the
typical peak of C-OH decreases dramatically in intensity, while the peak of C–O–C at
1214 cm-1 relatively increases simultaneously. Therefore, it is indicated that the -OH
bonds[9, 13]. Theoretical calculations have illustrated that oxygen near the conduction
and valence bands originated from the C − O – C covalent bonding which introduces
extra p states can decrease the bandgap of semiconductor[14]. Hence, the oxygen-rich
active sites on the GO surface (e.g., − OH, − COOH) can play a key role of cross-
linker to form C−O−C covalent bonding between GO and CNNP, which could be the
reason for the bandgap narrowing and enhanced visible-light absorption of the
Figure 2 (a) UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of CN, CNNP, and CNNP/GO nanocomposites.
(b) The plots of transformed Kubelka-Munk functions versus the light energy.
has a typical emission peak at 464 nm, while the emission peak of CNNP blue-shifts
to 430 nm, indicating a larger bandgap caused by the quantum confinement effect
with conduction[14]. And it can also be seen from the PL spectra that all the
CNNP/GO samples present a much lower intensity than that of CN and CNNP,
largely inhibited.
(Fig. 3). As shown in Fig. 3, only 12% of MB is decomposed by CNNP under visible-
light irradiation for 3 h due to its low absorption in visible light and some existent
CNNP/GO samples have much higher degradation efficiency for MB under the same
samples based on their different roles. Among all the CNNP/GO samples, CNNP/GO-
4 reaches the highest degradation rate of 67% within 3 h due to its suitable band gap
and the enhanced separation efficiency of photo-generated carriers. As the mass ratio
increases with the CNNP content. Further increasing the CNNP content, the
activity.
Conclusions
loading g-C3N4 nanoparticles on graphene oxide. The GO can narrow the bandgap of
CNNP and increase the visible-light utilization. Moreover, the GO can also facilitate
between GO and CNNP via C-O-C bonds. Another effect of the present work is to
propose a facile and efficient method to construct g-C3N4 based composite materials
through the assembly of g-C3N4 nanoparticles, and thus the CNNP can be loaded on
many other semiconductors with matched energy band structure to find new
Acknowledgements
References
[1] Y.-X. Zhou, L. Tong, X.-H. Zeng, X.-B. Chen, New J. Chem. 38(5) (2014) 1973-1979.
[2] L. Ge, Materials Letters 65(17-18) (2011) 2652-2654.
[3] J.N. Liu, Q.H. Jia, J.L. Long, X.X. Wang, Z.W. Gao, Q. Gu, Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 222
(2018) 35-43.
[4] F. Chen, Q. Yang, S. Wang, F. Yao, J. Sun, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, X. Li, C. Niu, D. Wang, G.
Zeng, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 209 (2017) 493-505.
[5] Z. You, Y. Su, Y. Yu, H. Wang, T. Qin, F. Zhang, Q. Shen, H. Yang, Applied Catalysis B:
Environmental 213 (2017) 127-135.
[6] P. Niu, L. Zhang, G. Liu, H.M. Cheng, Adv. Funct. Mater. 22(22) (2012) 4763-4770.
[7] L.B. Jiang, X.Z. Yuan, G.M. Zeng, Z.B. Wu, J. Liang, X.H. Chen, L.J. Leng, H. Wang, H.
Wang, Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 221 (2018) 715-725.
[8] H. Medina, Y.C. Lin, D. Obergfell, P.W. Chiu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 21(14) (2011) 2687-2692.
[9] Y. Li, H. Zhang, P. Liu, D. Wang, Y. Li, H. Zhao, Small 9(19) (2013) 3336-3344.
[10] X. Zhang, H. Wang, H. Wang, Q. Zhang, J. Xie, Y. Tian, J. Wang, Y. Xie, Adv. Mater. 26(26)
(2014) 4438-+.
[11] J.C. Shen, H. Yang, Q.H. Shen, Y. Feng, Q.F. Cai, Crystengcomm 16(10) (2014) 1868-1872.
[12] F. Dong, T. Xiong, Y. Sun, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Chem. Commun. 51(39) (2015) 8249-8252.
[13] A. Trejo, M. Calvino, E. Ramos, M. Cruz-Irisson, Nanoscale research letters 7(1) (2012) 471.
[14] J. Xu, L. Zhang, R. Shi, Y. Zhu, Journal of Materials Chemistry A 1(46) (2013) 14766-14772.
[15] X. Li, H. Wang, J.T. Robinson, H. Sanchez, G. Diankov, H. Dai, Journal of the American
Chemical Society 131(43) (2009) 15939-15944.
HIGHLIGHTS:
1. g-C3N4 nanoparticles with low recombination of photo-generated carriers were
prepared.
graphical abstract: