Unit_1_Assignment_Performance_Management_4268bc09afd2899d6396692a7bf08f25
Unit_1_Assignment_Performance_Management_4268bc09afd2899d6396692a7bf08f25
Effective Performance Management leads to a motivated workforce, higher efficiency, and overall
organizational success.
An effective Performance Management System (PMS) includes several key components for
systematic evaluation and improvement.
Key Components:
- Goal Setting: Clear, measurable objectives aligned with organizational goals.
- Performance Monitoring: Continuous tracking of progress.
- Feedback Mechanism: Regular reviews and constructive feedback.
- Training & Development: Identifies skill gaps and offers training.
- Performance Appraisal: Formal evaluation process for achievements and improvement areas.
- Compensation & Rewards: Recognition through bonuses and promotions.
- Performance Improvement Plans (PIP): Support for underperforming employees.
A well-designed PMS helps organizations boost productivity, retain talent, and create a positive work
environment.
While both terms relate to employee performance, they differ in scope, process, and objectives.
Key Differences:
- Definition: Performance Management is a continuous improvement process, while Performance
Appraisal is a periodic evaluation.
- Focus: Performance Management is future-oriented, focusing on growth, whereas Performance
Appraisal assesses past achievements.
- Frequency: Performance Management is ongoing, while Performance Appraisal is conducted
annually or quarterly.
- Objective: Performance Management aims to enhance skills and productivity, whereas
Performance Appraisal measures performance for rewards or corrections.
- Methodology: Performance Management includes goal setting, feedback, and training, while
Performance Appraisal involves formal assessments and rankings.