Group Project
Group Project
Making Process On
Rubber Lining Protection
Company By Using
Discrete Event
Simulation
Gian Akmal Adwitiya Ivana Nira Rengganis Andrian Widiatmoko Dini Novi Safitri
41620110065 41620120018 41620110077 41618110006
I. RESEARCH III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
INTRODUCTION METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND PROBLEM OBJECTIVE SCOPE & LIMITATION
Abbreviation:
● frp: Fiber Reinforced Plastic
I. RESEARCH III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
INTRODUCTION METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND PROBLEM OBJECTIVE SCOPE & LIMITATION
Flow Process
Making and
Application of
Rubber Lining
Fig. 1.5 Rubber Lining Flow process description (Ref. PT GSB,2022 ) youtube
IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
I. RESEARCH INTRODUCTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW III. RESEARCH METHODS
DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND PROBLEM OBJECTIVE SCOPE & LIMITATION
gsheet
I. RESEARCH III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
INTRODUCTION METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
1) unevenness/unsimilar
thickness and 2) visual: bumpy
The question is: how to improve the making process of rubber sheet so we could increase the productivity of the highest demand
product of the company
I. RESEARCH II. LITERATURE IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
III. RESEARCH METHODS
INTRODUCTION REVIEW DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND PROBLEM OBJECTIVE SCOPE & LIMITATION
Because of the inconsistent final product based on the research background, productivity on
rubber sheet is still low compared with other products. Productivity rate is lower because rubber
sheet often didn’t passFig.
the1.9 Example
quality Rubber Sheet
inspection.
Rubber mixing composition is a key factor for a good rubber sheet. Unbalanced mixing
composition can lead to uneven surface of the rubber sheet and it appears on the visual.
Machine and environment are also factors of what could cause the problem in production down
time.
I. RESEARCH II. LITERATURE IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
III. RESEARCH METHODS
INTRODUCTION REVIEW DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND PROBLEM OBJECTIVE SCOPE & LIMITATION
main question: how to improve production process of rubber sheet so we could increase the productivity of the most
profitable product of the company
How to answer that, we intend to: provide simulation based solution to improve production
process
I. RESEARCH III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
INTRODUCTION METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
Simulation is “the technique of imitating the behaviour of some situation A system is defined to be a collection of
by means of an analogous situation or apparatus to gain information more entities, people or machines, that act and
conveniently or to train (or entertain) personnel. ”There are two types of interact together toward the
simulation objectives: one is to gain information and the other is to train accomplishment of some logical end.
or entertain personnel. The former is often called an analytic simulation (Schmidt and Taylor, 1970)
and the latter a virtual environment simulation (Fujimoto, 2000).
Discrete-event simulation concerns the
modeling of a system as it evolves over time
by a representation in which the state
variables change instantaneously at
separate points in time. (Law, 2013)
Value of Simulation
Simulations are used instead of real systems for
many reasons :
● Cheaper
● Optimize the resources
● More configurable
Fig. 2.1. Discrete Event Simulation Flow Chart ● Safer (Reduce Risk)
● Faster (Or Slower link
● More accessible-easier to collect data
I. RESEARCH II. LITERATURE III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
INTRODUCTION REVIEW METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
Rubber lining is one of the proven methods employed to protect chemical process equipment against the corrosive and abrasive attacks of fluids
(Chandrasekaran, 2017). When it comes to rubber lining, there are 2 types of rubber that used in manufacturing :
In manufacturing, 70% of the rubber used is synthetic. When Unlike synthetic rubber, it’s a completely natural product that is ecologically
it comes to resistance, using synthetic rubber has several friendly. In addition, natural rubber linings also:
benefits, including:
● Have high tensile strength (can be stretched and return to form easily)
● Long lasting material ● High resistance to abrasion
● Superior resistance to heat and aging ● Adheres well to itself and other materials
● Flexible at low temperatures ● Can be used to develop a wide range of compound variations
● Resistant to electricity and chemicals
As much as synthetic and natural rubber linings vary, there are many applications for both, including:
Research Results
Hasan, et al (2012) • Adding more carbon black in the early milling process cause the low curing time and high
curing rate.
“The Effect of Rubber Mixing Process on the Curing • Small particle of carbon black resulting low curing time and high curing rate.
Characteristics of Natural Rubber” • Adding carbon black earlier in rubber mixing process resulting better curing time and
curing rate.
• High temperature cause low curing time and curing rate.
Setyowati (1995) • Suitable formulation for rubber lining of chemical tanks are soft rubber lining.
• Formulation of the soft rubber lining is 50% of RSS and 50% SBR.
“Penelitian penggunaan campuran karet alam (RSS = Rubber Sheet Smoke, SBR = Stiren Butadien Rubber)
• The formulation above has passed the chemical and physical testing of rubber
RSS dengan stiren butadien rubber (SBR) dalam
pembuatan soft rubber lining”
Proposed Model • Make a more efficient and effective model in Rubber Sheet Making Process
• Modelling and Simulating using Promodel software
• All of the simulation are aiming in creating a better and efficient flow process in rubber
lining process.
Table. 2.1 Reseach and Result (Ref. Jurnal Hasan 2012 and Setyowati 1995)
I. RESEARCH II. LITERATURE III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
INTRODUCTION REVIEW METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
LITERATURE REVIEW MOST RELATED RESEARCH
Research Results
Arungpadang (2021) • Simulation by using Arena Software
“Simulasi Sistem Manufaktur, Studi Kasus : Proses Produksi Brake • Analyse bottleneck workstation
Drum Coupling” • Create several improved model to be compared with initial
condition
• Increasing production with improved model
Yulianto, and Pamungkas (2017) • Simulation by using Tecnomatix Plant Simulation
“Penerapan Sistemik Layout Planning dan Discrete Event Simulation • Increasing total product quantity by 6% a year by shortening
Untuk Perbaikan Tata Letak Mesin Pabrik di Industri Komponen Alat moving distance
Berat”
Table. 2.2 Reseach and Result (Ref. Jurnal Arungpadang2021, Yulianto and Pamungkas 2017, and Dejan 2020)
I. RESEARCH II. LITERATURE III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
INTORDUCTION REVIEW METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
RESEARCH FLOW PROCESS DATA MODELLING PROCESS
Existing System
Conclusion and Suggestion
Research Exploratory ❖Build existing system-model
❖Conclusion
❖Company Observation ❖Simulate model using promodel
❖Suggestion & Recommendation
❖Literature Review ❖Output analysis
❖Define The Problem
Conclusion and
Research Exploratory Data Processing Existing System Proposed Improvement
Suggestion
10 min
DATA PROCESSING
PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
Table x.x Data recapitulation of Descriptive Statistics and Distribution testing results
gsheet nb: process time (mnts) of rubber lining production process of 1 kind of product
I. RESEARCH III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
INTORDUCTION METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
Variability/Replication Analysis
Number of Replication Calculation
ProModel
Replication
Production
1 5 n’ = number of replication
2 5
s = standard deviation
based on sample
3 4
β = half width
4 5
5 5
6 5
7 2
8 4
9 3
10 2
MEAN 4,0
STDEV 1,2472
N 10
confidence interval = 95% , TdF =2.26, Zα/2 =1.96 for error 0.05
I. RESEARCH III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
INTORDUCTION METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
Variability/Replication Analysis
Comparison between Actual
Production to ProModel Simulation Degree of Freedom and Half Width Calculation
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
Variability/Replication Analysis
Confidence Interval
n1 ≠ n2
so we use welch confidence
interval methods therefore;
H0 : u1 - u2 = 0, if 0 inside u1 - u2’s
range, the experiment is valid
H1 : u1 - u2 ≠ 0, if 0 outside u1 -
u2’s range, the experiment is not
valid due to significant means
difference We can conclude H0 hypothesis is true, there is no
significant difference betweens means of actual
production and Model Simulation.
So, we can use Model Simulation to make proposed
model to increased production throughput
I. RESEARCH III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
INTORDUCTION METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
existing simulation
we use: 3 reps, it’s enough data to observe
link
General Report
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
● from hypothesis testing and replication analysis, we found that is true that the number of reps will be affecting the outcome, 3
reps. represent the closest annual output with existing model on the field
● the number of output model is resulted from 95% service level, 8 hrs total running time (7.5 operation + 0.5 warming up)
I. RESEARCH III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
INTORDUCTION METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
Improvement Points
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
IMPROVEMENT MODEL
link
link
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
| Entities Output
-33%
+134%
Table. 4.5 entities output Fig. 4.7 Graph comparison of exiting vs proposed promodel
● The result of proposed model that use conveyor and installed of mixing+weighing machine, could increase both efficiency and
effectivity of overall system, including current qty in system
● manpower reduction may occur with statement: each one handle one machine, and yet we prepared 1 machinist for preventive
and regular maintenance, and each operator should be trained well periodically thus they could handle self-maintenance for its
machine
IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
I. RESEARCH INTORDUCTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW III. RESEARCH METHODS
DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
| Resources Report
existing proposed
● the pattern of proposed model seems uniform number due to the reliable travel time between each station in the system, the
idle time, in travel time could reduce
● implementation of conveyor is also affect the worker occupancy, it could reduce the ‘% in use’ of the resources
IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
I. RESEARCH INTORDUCTION II. LITERATURE REVIEW III. RESEARCH METHODS
DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
● Location capacity are also different from existing to proposed model due to reliability of processing time (normalized
distribution of processing time), it seems in the proposed model is more uniformed between each working station
● These capacity of each working station could reduce idle time and blocking time of entire system in the end
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
| Location Utilization
existing proposed
● reduction of utilization number differences between each prod station on proposed model seems to make the entire system run
well and gives better output than existing system, it’s because the processing time has normal distribution-process time and still
weighing and calendering takes more time because it needs more processing time as normal
I. RESEARCH III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
INTORDUCTION METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
DATA PROCESSING EXISTING SYSTEM PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ANALYZE THE RESULTS WHAT-IF ANALYSIS
1. In the process of simulation modeling to imitate the real system exist on the field, we found that field observation and statistical analysis such as
replication analysis and hypothesis testing shall be done at the first stage before we improved / proposed the new model, because it directly
relate to the production output. From stats.analysis we can have 3 replication to make the existing model in promodel, then the output will be
the same as field observation
2. Main parameter that directly to be considered for improvement model are: processing time, distance, logical movement between working
station, and cost.
3. The result of proposed model will be higher than current production output (from 4-5 pcs/day to 11 pcs/day) by using conveyor as the
movement agent for entities to be sent to another working station so the the resources operation time could be more uniform and having a
normal distribution time between each working station and reduce transport time percentage and increase operation time of the total working
time in system.
4. The main bottleneck at weighing and mixing resolved by implementation of 1 machine that can run automatically for desired formula as client
requested. Then the calendering rework could be reduce up to 50% by tidy-up the storage area and better mixing formula at the beginning
5. Proposed model output will have an efficient and effective in terms of manpower resource by 33% less, processing time 19% less and output
result 133% for 11 pcs/day - 192% for 16 pcs/day more than existing system (4 pcs/day)
6. However, the proposed model can be run smoothly by consider the power outage and reduction of rework, we found that the bar tolerance of
power outage is at 3 hrs, so the it wouldn’t affect the annual production output and the rework process should be less than 30 mins will
resulted the production output from 11 to 16 pcs/day.
I. RESEARCH III. RESEARCH IV. RESULT & V. CONCLUSION &
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
INTORDUCTION METHODS DISCUSSION SUGGESTION
CONCLUSION SUGGESTION & RECOMMENDATION
Suggestion
1. Improvement: the company should consider the proposed model to be one comprehensive solution to increase the whole
productivity to achieve its annual production target
2. Prevention System: we use 1 machine for 1 operator to be focused on so the maintenance schedule whether it’s preventive or
corrective action could be handle with it’s man, and also we provide 1 machinist to assist the maintenance thus the machine can run
smoothly, however the back-up person should be exist to prevent the absence of worker and regular training
Recommendation
1. operation implementation: The proposed model will be exist and run as the author estimate if the company would invest mode for
example: 1 new machine for weighing and mixing machine, drying machine, conveyor system, gen-set
2. Future research: the proposed model should count the cost production for related location and resources in the system to know
exactly cost differences between existing and proposed system for investment decision making process
3. Financial: COGS could be high as new investment begin due to high operating cost and will have resulted the bottom line has small
number, yet if we make a good long term/annual contract that consider the max output (16 pcs/day) the targeted margin can be
attainable.
4. Partnership: electricity outages could be prevent by the partnership such as PLN to reach the possibility of the max output from the
system has proposed. The author proposed partnership for others applicator company in the rubber sheet value chain in the rubber
industry to increase the annual target for the highest profitable product of the company.
REFERENCE
Main
● Company introduction of PT. IBS . Link
● Hasan, A., Rochmadi, R., Sulistyo, H., & Honggokusumo, S. (2012, November). The Effect of Rubber Mixing Process on
The Curing Characteristics of Natural Rubber. Makara Journal of Technology, 16(2), 109-115. Link
● Lutfianto, Dhimas. (2022). System Modeling. Link
● Setyowati, P., Nadilah, S., & Murwati. (1995). Research on the Use of Mixture of Natural Rubber RSS with Styrene
Butadiene Rubber (SBR) in Making Soft Rubber Lining. Magazine : Leather, Rubber, and Plastic, X(19), 72-80. Link
● Welch’s t-Interval. Link
Complementary
● Burhanudin, M. (2012). Discrete Event Simulation Study Case. Link
● Description of Stat Fit Panel. Link
● Desi, Nyimas. (2020). System Modeling Using Promodel. Youtube : Link
● Wibisono. (2022). Promodel Simulation. Youtube : Link
● Icon For This Slide. Link
● Intellspot. (2018). Discrete vs Continuous Data-Comparison Chart. Link
● Jimmyns. (2014). Promodel Description. Link
● Simanjuntak, Maringan. (2021). Discrete Probability Distribution. Youtube : Link
● Simulation Laboratory and Industrial Application. (2017). Module Simulation and Promodel Software. Brawijaya
University. Link
● Syihab, Faizah. (2021). Discrete and Continuous. Youtube : Link
● video making using powerpoint: link
I’d like to thank you to all the
team member for staying up
and make progress from the
beginning until finished
the last story tell..