Similarity - Home Education Vs Face
Similarity - Home Education Vs Face
Document Details
Submission ID
trn:oid:::15229:90272167 3 Pages
Download Date
File Name
File Size
17.9 KB
2% Overall Similarity
The combined total of all matches, including overlapping sources, for each database.
Quoted Text
Cited Text
0 Missing Citation 0%
Matches that have quotation marks, but no in-text citation
Integrity Flags
0 Integrity Flags for Review
Our system's algorithms look deeply at a document for any inconsistencies that
No suspicious text manipulations found. would set it apart from a normal submission. If we notice something strange, we flag
it for you to review.
0 Missing Citation 0%
Matches that have quotation marks, but no in-text citation
Top Sources
The sources with the highest number of matches within the submission. Overlapping sources will not be displayed.
1 Submitted works
1
Home Education vs Face-to-Face Education
1 The effectiveness of home education versus face-to-face education in the contemporary world has
been a point of significant debate owing to its unprecedented accentuation in the COVID-19
pandemic. While both models strive to prepare the learner for achieving success in life, they are
different in approach, structure, social interactions, and many more ways. As I argue in this essay,
individualized learning plans coupled with flexibility which home schooling offers is beneficial,
where as traditional schooling is more rigid in nature yet crucial for social development, normative
behavior, and gaining knowledge through observation—hence, each approach is suitable based on
the learner's circumstances and preferences (National Home Education Research Institute
[NHERI], 2025).
The flexibility, and learner-centered strategies of home education are its main contributors to its
growing popularity. One of its best assets is the ability to navigate education through the child’s
preferred pace, wholly encompassing their interests, hobbies, and knowledge. As per theNHERI
(2025) report, homeschooled learners tend to achieve 15 to 25 percentile points higher on
standardized achievement assessments in comparison to their public-schooled peers. This
observation alongside the strong correlation of personalized learning, molds academic
performance, reinforcing its validity. In addition, the home environment is devoid of common
classroom distractions, such as peer related pressures, noise, and strict clock watching. This lack
of distractions only improves focus and productivity towards tasks at hand. Sparks Services (2024)
also points out the fact that homeschooling strengthens critical thinking and self-guided learning,
which constitutes the foundation for enduring learning. The free will fosters self-motivation and
creativity because the learners can explore topics freely at their own pace. Furthermore,
homeschooling expands beyond the four walls of a house where students can go out of their
comfort zone and explore the real world. Students can participate in hands-on learning outside the
classroom walls by going to museums, field trips, and libraries (Sparks Services, 2024).
Education that occurs in-person and steps the students through a curriculum set by schools remains
the main form of teaching. This is one of the most popular methods around the world, and a face-
to-face classroom structure relies heavily on solo learners. The value provided is guided
instructional delivery by qualified teachers. Moreover, the formal education methods enable a
parent to devote far greater emotional or professional resources, at times, than they could provide
at home. Aside from learning gaps, the manifold maturing issues are taken care of through holistic
provision, that is balanced and enriched. Students learn essential socio-emotional skills, such as
collaboration, communication, and relationship formation through daily interaction with peers,
according to Crown Counseling (2024), making in-person education a necessity for social-
emotional learning. In addition, students have many opportunities to access advanced resources
such as laboratories for sciences, sports, arts, and various other specialized programs, allowing
participation in both academic and nonacademic exercises. Through deadlines, teamwork, and
constructive criticism, discipline, time management, and accountability are ingrained in students.
Because these traits, alongside social skills, are vital, traditional schooling is important. Unlike
homeschooling, learning that happens in a classroom exposes students to many social situations
and peer interactions from diverse cultures and socio-economic backgrounds. These social-
emotional experiences, as Crown Counseling (2024) points out, are nearly impossible to replicate
at home, particularly during adolescence when the individual is in the midst of complicated
emotional growth.
In the end, whether a student is homeschooled or attends traditional school should depend on the
student's unique situation and not on which option is comparatively better. The flexibility and
independence that come with homeschooling is advantageous for students who require extra
attention or students who thrive on independent learning. On the other hand, it offers little in terms
of social interactions and organizational frameworks like those found in traditional schools
{[NHERI, 2025]} {[Sparks Services, 2024]}. In contrast, face-to-face education enhances social
interactions, and provides a wide variety of academic and developmental activities {[Crown
Counseling, 2024]}. Parents and educators need to consider the student’s preferred learning
method, emotional wellbeing, and other pertinent factors to decide the best educational model.
With a constantly evolving nature of education, it seems combining the two systems, each with its
own strengths, would create the most effective educational strategy for learners today.
References: