chapter 7
chapter 7
What is a Bottleneck?
A bottleneck is any obstacle, barrier, or delay that prevents the effective implementation of a
Performance Management (PM) system. These bottlenecks often reduce the efficiency,
acceptance, or effectiveness of the PM process.
Key Bottlenecks
1. Lack of Clear Goals and Objectives
• Problem: Employees don’t know what is expected of them.
• Cause: Vague job descriptions, poor goal setting, or misaligned strategic objectives.
• Effect: Confusion, low motivation, and poor performance tracking.
Example: In a marketing department, staff are told to “increase brand awareness,” but there are no
KPIs to measure how.
2. Inadequate Training and Awareness
• Problem: Managers and employees are unfamiliar with the PM tools or process.
• Cause: PM systems are rolled out without proper onboarding or training.
• Effect: The system is underused or misused, leading to errors and frustration.
Example: A new digital performance appraisal system is introduced, but supervisors don’t know
how to use it, resulting in incomplete reviews.
3. Resistance to Change
• Problem: Employees and even managers resist the new system.
• Cause: Fear of being judged, job insecurity, or comfort with old methods.
• Effect: Lack of cooperation, delay in adoption, and passive sabotage.
Example: Employees at a government office resist a new KPI system because it replaces the
seniority-based promotion culture.
4. Poor Communication
• Problem: Objectives, expectations, and feedback aren’t shared clearly or regularly.
• Cause: Weak internal communication practices or top-down information flow.
• Effect: Employees feel disconnected, confused, or ignored.
Example: A logistics company sets team goals but never explains them in meetings, leading to
poor coordination.
5. Lack of Leadership Commitment
• Problem: Senior leaders don’t actively support the PM process.
• Cause: Leaders may see PM as an “HR-only” function or may not believe in its value.
• Effect: PM loses credibility and importance across the organization.
Example: A CEO never joins the annual performance review meetings or doesn’t reward top
performers publicly.
6. Ineffective or Biased Appraisals
• Problem: Reviews are not fair, consistent, or based on data.
• Cause: Manager bias, favoritism, or lack of standardized evaluation criteria.
• Effect: Employees lose trust in the system, and morale drops.
Example: Two employees with similar performance receive different ratings because one has a
better relationship with the manager.
7. Overemphasis on Evaluation, Not Development
• Problem: PM focuses only on judging performance, not improving it.
• Cause: Organizations use it as a compliance tool, not a development tool.
• Effect: Employees feel demotivated or punished instead of supported.
Example: A hospital staff review process only identifies who underperformed but doesn’t offer
any training or improvement plans.
8. Technological Challenges
• Problem: The system is outdated, difficult to use, or unreliable.
• Cause: Poor software choice, lack of IT support, or low digital literacy.
• Effect: Employees avoid the system, or data gets lost/inaccurate.
Example: A small firm implements a complex HR system that crashes often, so staff revert to
Excel sheets.
9. One-Size-Fits-All Approach
• Problem: Same PM process is applied to all departments regardless of their nature.
• Cause: Lack of customization for diverse roles or functions.
• Effect: Misalignment between individual roles and performance metrics.
Example: A creative team is evaluated using the same time-bound metrics used for a sales team,
ignoring the innovation process.
10. Lack of Follow-up and Continuity
• Problem: PM becomes an annual exercise without ongoing engagement.
• Cause: No system for monthly or quarterly feedback/check-ins.
• Effect: Employees don’t take the process seriously; goals become outdated.
Example: A university holds appraisals only once a year, and no one tracks progress between
reviews.
How to Overcome These Bottlenecks?
Solution Description
Provide clear, SMART goals Ensures every employee knows what's expected
Offer training and support Helps users adopt systems confidently
Communicate regularly Keeps everyone aligned and informed
Involve leaders Top-down support boosts system credibility
Customize systems Tailor PM approaches for different roles
Promote continuous feedback Makes PM an everyday process, not a yearly event