0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views

API FORM

The document outlines the faculty evaluation process at Sriram Engineering College, detailing various assessment criteria including theory subjects handled, internal test evaluations, value addition activities, self-improvement efforts, attendance, contributions to the department, and student feedback. Each section specifies maximum points achievable and the corresponding evaluation metrics. The final grading is determined based on the total points secured, with grades ranging from A to F.

Uploaded by

sowmisoms0
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views

API FORM

The document outlines the faculty evaluation process at Sriram Engineering College, detailing various assessment criteria including theory subjects handled, internal test evaluations, value addition activities, self-improvement efforts, attendance, contributions to the department, and student feedback. Each section specifies maximum points achievable and the corresponding evaluation metrics. The final grading is determined based on the total points secured, with grades ranging from A to F.

Uploaded by

sowmisoms0
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

SRIRAM ENGINEERING COLLEGE

PERUMALPATTU, CHENNAI - 602 024

FACULTY OBJECTIVE -EVALUATION

Faculty Name :

Designation :

Department :

Date of Joining :

Qualification :
Assessment Period:
Total Experience in yrs (a) Teaching - (b) Industry –

1. Details of Theory Subjects handled (EVEN SEM 2023 – 2024& ODD SEM 2024 – 2025)
90Points (Max.)
S. Target Points
Actual
Subject Name & Code Pass % Pass %
No Target Achieved

Average
Note: Points corresponding to Percentage: 100%=90 95-99.9%=81 90-94.9%=72
80-89.9%=63 70-79.9%=54 60-69.9%=45
50-59.9%=36 40-49.9%=27Below40%=0

1.1 Internal Test Evaluation (ODD &EVEN SEM 2024 – 2025) 40 Points (Max.)
Internal Test I, II and Model Exam Results (Only results of first appearance to be included)

Points
Target Actual
Subject Name & Code Test Pass%
S. No. Pass % Target Achieved
Average

Note: Points corresponding to Percentage Above 90%=40 80-89.9%=36 70-79.9%=32


60-69.9%=2850-59.9%=24 40-49.9%=20
30-39.9%=16<30%= 0

2. Value Addition (Department Activities) 40 Points (Max.)

Points
Activities Target Achieved Details
Target Achieved
Guest Lecture/Webinar
Arrangement
(Max 2 / Yr.) – 5 Points / GL

Industrial Visit Arrangement


(Max 1 / Yr.) - 5 Points /Visit
Placement Initiative
Max–1 Companies/year-
5 Points/Company
Organizing Online/0ffline
FDP/STTP/Conference
/Workshop etc.
(Max – 2 Nos./Year) –
10 Points/No.

Total

3. Self-Improvement 180 Points (Max.)


(Supporting documents should be provided for the all the declarations)

3.1 Online/Offline FDP/Workshop/Webinar Attended 50 Points (Max.)

Target: Achieved:

Category Duration Title Venue Marks


(FDP/ OFF line
ON line mode
Workshop mode
etc.) 1 for 5 Webinar (1 1 if duration
hr.) =1day
2 if duration <=3 3 if duration
days <= 3 days
5 if duration > 3 and 5 if duration
<=6 days <= 6 days
8 if duration > 7 days 8 if duration
>= 7 days

Target Achieved

Total

3.1 Paper Presented in National Conferences (Max 2) 10 Points (Max.)

Target: Achieved:

Marks
5 for National Conference at IIT and
Paper Title Date Venue equivalent Institutions
2 for Others
Target Achieved

Total

3.2 Paper Presented in International Conferences (Max 2) 20 Points (Max.)

Target: Achieved:

Marks
10 for Int. Conference at Abroad
6 for Int. Conference at IIT and
Paper Title Date Venue equivalent Institutions
3 for Others
Target Achieved

Total
3.3 Paper Published in National/International Journals (Max 5) 50 Points (Max.)

Target: Achieved:

Marks
10 for SCI/Annexure I
Volume No. & 6 for Scopus/UGC recognized Journals
Paper Title Journal Name
Page No. 3 for Others
Target Achieved

Total

3.4 Funded Project/ Consultancy and patents 50 Points (Max.)

Points
Activities Target Achieved Details
Target Achieved

Total

4. Leave /Punctuality
Faculty Attendance (Jan – Dec 2024) 20 Points (Max.)

Tot No of Points
S. Working
Parameters Nos. (a) Calculation in %
No
Days (b) Target Achieved
Leave taken-with proper
1. procedure.
Emergency Leave taken -
2. with alternate arrangements
made.
Emergency Leave taken -
without alternate
3.
arrangements
made.
Average
Points corresponding to Percentage 95- 100% = 20 90-94.9%=18 80-89.9% = 16
70-79.9% = 14 60-69.9%=12 50-59.9% = 10
<49.9%=0

5. Contribution to the Department /Institution. (Other than academics) 80 Points (Max.)

Points
Activities Target Achieved Details
Target Achieved
HOD / Convener of Committee
Max 2 -
HOD -10 Points,
Convener-7Points
Dept. Coordinator (ISO/Time
Table/Class In-charge, etc.)
Max 2 –
Class In-charge - 8 Points
Others – 5 Points
Contribution to the department /
Institution during Emergencies.
Max 2- 5 Points each
Admission Promotion
10 Points each
Any Other Noteworthy Contribution –
Invited Lectures, Public lectures, Talks,
Seminars, Popular writings, Conference
Chair, MoU, Internship / IPT,
Max 2 – 5 Points each
Award/Medals Received – Any
Appreciation
Max 2 – 5 Points each
Total

6. Student’s Feedback 50 Points (Max.)

Target Feedback
Subject Name Feedback Achieved (Out of 5)
(Out of 5)

Average Feedback
Marks = Average Feedback * 10

FOR Head of the Department’s USE ONLY - GRADING

Grading Secured
S. No. Max Points Points Secured
(to be filled by HOD)
Grading Corresponding to Points Secured

Points Grade
400-500 A
300-399 B
250-299 C
200-249 D
150-199 E
< 150 F

Faculty Signature

Remarks / Recommendations of Head of Department / Head of Institution:


(To include achievement of Objectives of Staff Members)

Head of the Department

You might also like