10_Leadership
10_Leadership
1. Autocratic.
2. Democratic.
3. Laissez-faire.
Effective vs. Poor Leadership
Understanding Effective vs. Poor Leadership
• Work on the assumption that the most effective style of leadership changes
from situation to situation
• Leader must be able to adapt his style and approach to different
circumstances
• Example: some employees function better under leader who is more
autocratic while others prefer leader to step back and give others chance
• Not all industries require same skills and leadership traits- many theories
developed
Hersey and Blanchard’s
Situational Leadership Theory
• Suggests need to match two key
elements correctly: leadership style of the
leader and maturity/preparedness of the
followers
• Main leadership approaches- telling,
selling, participating, delegating
• Four levels of follower maturity- low
competence and commitment (M1), low
competence and high commitment
(M2), high competence and low
commitment (M3), and high
competence and commitment (M4)
• Key to successful leadership is matching
proper leadership style to maturity level
Goleman’s Model of Situational Leadership
• Guide in determining optimum amount of time and group input that should
be committed to a decision
• Number of options for leader
• Key Questions: is decision quality important? Does the leader have enough
information to make a decision? Is the problem structured and easily
analyzed? Do members have high levels of competence in working as a
group?
Practice Question 3
What do all of the leadership theories we have just reviewed have in common?
Are leaders born and not made? Review the list of leadership traits and discuss
which of them you think can be learned versus those that are inherent in one’s
personality make-up. What about management traits/duties? Are these
learned versus inherent?
Quick Review