Ayala Case Study (1)
Ayala Case Study (1)
SY 2024-2025
CASE STUDY
Ayala Corporation is the oldest business house in the Philippines, tracing its
origins back to 1834 when it was established as Casa Róxas by Domingo Róxas and
Antonio de Ayala. It began as a distillery and trading business during the Spanish
colonial era, later expanding into infrastructure and finance.
By the late 19th century, Ayala was already involved in progressive ventures
such as tramcar services and water systems. The company was instrumental in building
modern Manila and later played a major role in developing Makati into the country’s
premier business district after World War II.
In 1968, the partnership was transformed into Ayala Corporation. Under the
leadership of Col. Joseph R. McMicking and successive generations, Ayala diversified
into real estate (Ayala Land), banking (Bank of the Philippine Islands), telecom (Globe
Telecom), and more recently, renewable energy, healthcare, logistics, and education.
As one of the oldest and most respected corporations in the Philippines, Ayala
also grapples with the ongoing challenge of balancing its legacy with the need for
innovation. While it remains a cornerstone of Philippine business, the company has had
to adapt its strategies to remain competitive in an era of rapid digital transformation.
In 2024, Ayala reported a robust core net income, driven by some of its key
subsidiaries, although significant challenges arose with AC Health and AC Mobility,
which both recorded notable losses.
Ayala Corporation posted a record core net income of ₱45 billion in 2024, driven
by strong performance from its key businesses like BPI, Ayala Land, and Globe
Telecom. However, its emerging business units (particularly AC Health and AC Mobility)
continue to face financial struggles. AC Health reported a ₱610 million net loss, while
AC Mobility’s losses grew to ₱465 million.
Given these ongoing losses from its new ventures, how can Ayala Corporation
ensure that its diversification efforts will contribute positively to its long-term profitability
and help achieve its ₱65 billion core net income target by 2026?
III. SWOT Analysis
● Pro: Cross-platform integration (using BPI for health financing, Globe for
telemedicine) enhances visibility, reduces customer acquisition costs (CAC), and
improves return on investment (ROI).
● Con: The complexity of aligning strategies across different subsidiaries may slow
down execution and increase operational hurdles.
Among the three alternative courses of action, ACA No. 1: Synergy Utilization
stands out as the most effective strategy for Ayala Corporation. By using the strengths
of its different subsidiaries, such as BPI for health financing and Globe for online
healthcare services, Ayala can reach more people and reduce marketing and
operational costs. This integrated approach allows the company to tap into existing
customer bases and infrastructures, making growth more efficient and sustainable.
Though it may take extra effort to align different business units, the long term benefits of
increased visibility, lower customer acquisition costs, and improved return on investment
outweigh the complexity.
In simple terms, Ayala Corporation already has great tools—it just needs to use
them together in a smart way. This strategy helps save money, grow faster, and make
the most out of what the company already owns. It's a practical and powerful way for
Ayala to grow without needing to start from scratch or take big risks.
VI. References