Cisco UCC Ent Case Study Neb Damjanovic
Cisco UCC Ent Case Study Neb Damjanovic
Cont a ct Cent er
E nt er p r ise Ca se
S t u dy
Ci sco S O N A and U ni f i ed
Communi cati ons
Unified I P I V R
Unified CV P
13M+ C i s c o IP P h o n e s S h ip p e d to O v e r
4 8 ,0 0 0 +U C C u s to m e r s In c lu d in g 7 0 % +o f th e
F o rtu n e 5 0 0 U s in g C is c o U n if ie d
C o m m u n ic a tio n s
200+ c u s t o m e r s d e p l o y i n g m o r e t h a n 5 , 000 I P p h o n e s
8 M +U n it y s e a ts s h ip p e d
1 .1 M +C o n ta c t C e n te r s e a ts
200K + M e e t i n g P l a c e l i c e n s e s
3 0M + V o I P p o r t s s h i p p e d
8 0M + P o w e r o v e r E t h e r n e t p o r t s
7 0K + C i s c o U n i f i e d C o m m u n i c a t i o n s M a n a g e r l i c e n s e s
6 5 K +C is c o U n if ie d C o m m u n ic a t io n s M a n a g e r E x p r e s s
lic e n s e s
C is c o I s D i s p l a c i n g 16 , 0 0 0 T D M P h o n e s E v e r y
B u s in e s s D a y
C is c o S h i p p e d O v e r 1M+ P h o n e s E a c h o f L a s t
4 Q u a rte rs
O v e r v ie w
– 8 0 m illio n c a l l s , 17 0 m i l l i o n m i n u t e s p e r y e a r
– 30 0 , 0 0 0 c u s to m e r s p e r d a y , 2 5 ,0 0 0 c a lls p e r h o u r
– 30 0 0 + A g e n ts
– A ll s ite s s e e n a s “C u s t o m e r I n t e r a c t i o n N e t w o r k ”
S o lu tio n
– IP C C H o s te d
In c u m b e n t
– E r ic s s o n
R e s u lts
– G a in e d 10 % p r o d u c tiv it y v ia e ffic ie n t u s e o f a g e n t r e s o u r c e s
– A llo w s ra p id d e p lo y m e n t o f n e w s ite s to h a n d le p e a k tr a ffic p e r io d s
– S y s te m c o m b in e s in fo r m a tio n a n d r e s o u r c e s to b e tte r u n d e r s ta n d
th e ir b u s in e s s
24 x 7
F o llo w th e s u n
A ll o r n o th in g
In th e a te r , d u r in g b u s in e s s h o u r s , la n g u a g e s u p p o r t
London
Brus s el s
B e i j i ng
T ok y o
S e u l
San J os e
R T P , N C
Sy d ney
Support Backbone
R T P
S a n J o s e
ICM
S ydn ey
C o r p O p s –H ig h v o lu m e , s h o r t ta lk tim e .
•8 00 c a l l s p e r a g e n t / d a y
•1 00% tra n s fe rs
•G T R C –C o m p le x p h o n e tr e e s , a g e n ts o n lin e
IV R Q u al it y C h at
M onit or ing
A C D A g ent E-mail
Desk t op
C T I W or k f or ce V id eo
O p t imiz at ion
N etsca pe G oog le
Ofoto F lick r
Y o u w i l l k no w m e w h en I c o nt ac t y o u
P redictions
A g ent s w il l not need t o au t h ent icat e cal l er s
P er sonal iz at ion w il l be t h e nor m, not t h e ex cep t ion
C r oss ch annel sessions w il l be consist ent – 1 0 0 % of d at a f r om a
w eb session w il l p er sist t o t h e p h one
Y o u w i l l t ak e m y p r o b l em as s er i o u s l y as I d o
P redictions
S op h ist icat ed cr isis manag ement t ech niq u es w il l be ap p l ied
br oad l y t o cu st omer ser vice
Ever y emp l oy ee w il l be avail abl e t o p r ovid e cu st omer ser vice
C u st omer s w il l no l ong er need t o escal at e t o su p er visor s
Y o u w i l l w o r k ar o u nd m y s c h ed u l e and l i f es t y l e
P redictions
No cal l er w il l ever be p u t on h ol d ag ain
8 0 % of al l cu st omer ser vice w il l be h and l ed via sel f ser vice
H al f or mor e of al l cu st omer issu es w il l be r esol ved by cu st omer
g ener at ed cont ent in ex p er t commu nit ies
W e w i l l i nt er ac t i n t h e c h annel t h at I c h o o s e
P redictions
S M S w il l accou nt f or 6 0 % of al l w r it t en car e commu nicat ions and
w il l become t h e r eceip t f or most t r ansact ions
4 0 % of car e int er act ions w il l invol ve vid eo, 2 5 % w il l invol ve T V s
6 5 % of vid eo int er act ions w il l be p r er ecor d ed ( e. g . sh ow me)
P redictions
M ood s and cont act int ent w il l be ant icip at ed by t h e ent er p r ise
C al l er w il l g o t o t h e r ig h t p l ace t h e f ir st t ime - even if t h at is
ou t sid e of t h e cont act cent er
2 0 % of al l car e cal l s w il l not h ap p en at al l
1 , 000
8 00
6 00
4 00
2 00
0
2 004 2 005 2 006 2 007 2 008 2 009
I P A g en t S ea ts
S o u r c e: G a r tn er ( 2 0 0 6 ) T r a ditio n a l T D M A g en t S ea ts
P r e s e n ta tio n _ ID ©2 0 0 7 C is c o S y s te m s , In c . A ll r ig h ts r e s e r v e d . C is c o C o n fid e n tia l 29
I P A d op tion : E n terp rise v s. Con ta ct Cen ter
9 0%
8 0%
7 0%
6 0%
I P M igra tion
5 0%
4 0%
3 0%
2 0%
10%
2 004 2 005 2 006 2 007 2 008 2 009
E n ter p r is e I P T elep h o n y ( L in es )
S o u r c e: G a r tn er ( 2 0 0 6 ) , S yn er g y R es ea r c h ( 2 0 0 6 ) I P C o n ta c t C en ter ( S ea ts )
P r e s e n ta tio n _ ID ©2 0 0 7 C is c o S y s te m s , In c . A ll r ig h ts r e s e r v e d . C is c o C o n fid e n tia l 30
Ar c h i t ec t u r al R ev o l u t i o n ( no t E v o l u t i o n)
T h e conta ct center w ill look very d ifferent in a few y ea rs.
C ont act C ent er A r ch it ect u r e
F u nct ion
C u r r ent Emer g ing
Scripting P ro prie ta ry V X M L , C C X M L
C a l l C o ntro l A C D , P B X C C X M L , SI P
V o ice / D a ta A l ignm e nt C T I V o I P ( SI P )
SO A -b a s e d
R o u ting L o gic P ro prie ta ry
b u s ine s s ru l e s
“A ge nt” D e s k to p P ro prie ta ry , f a t cl ie nt I M , A ny I P e nd po int
S ec ure, R el iab l e
Communic ations th at Connec ts
A l l of th e O th er Comp onents