Active Embryo
Active Embryo
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01215-1
The physical state of embryonic tissues emerges from non-equilibrium, collective interactions among constituent cells. Cellular
jamming, rigidity transitions and characteristics of glassy dynamics have all been observed in multicellular systems, but it is
unclear how cells control these emergent tissue states and transitions, including tissue fluidization. Combining computational
and experimental methods, here we show that tissue fluidization in posterior zebrafish tissues is controlled by the stochastic
dynamics of tensions at cell–cell contacts. We develop a computational framework that connects cell behaviour to embryonic
tissue dynamics, accounting for the presence of extracellular spaces, complex cell shapes and cortical tension dynamics. We
predict that tissues are maximally rigid at the structural transition between confluent and non-confluent states, with actively
generated tension fluctuations controlling stress relaxation and tissue fluidization. By directly measuring strain and stress
relaxation, as well as the dynamics of cell rearrangements, in elongating posterior zebrafish tissues, we show that tension fluc-
tuations drive active cell rearrangements that fluidize the tissue. These results highlight a key role of non-equilibrium tension
dynamics in developmental processes.
M
any essential processes in multicellular organisms, from These descriptions predict a density-independent rigidity tran-
organ formation to tissue homoeostasis, require a tight sition in confluent systems that depends on the balance between
control of the tissue physical state1,2. While tissue mechan- actomyosin-generated cortical tension T0 and cell adhesion W
ics and structure at supracellular scales emerge from the collective (treated as passive, effective tensions), with the resulting cell shape
physical interactions among the constituent cells, their control being the control parameter for solid/fluid states17. Since cell shape
occurs at cell and subcellular levels. Bridging these scales is essen- plays a central role in models of confluent systems, the ability to
tial to understand the physical nature of active multicellular systems accurately describe complex cell shapes, beyond polygonal shapes,
and to identify the processes that cells use to control the physical may be important to understand the physical state of the system, as
state of embryonic tissues. recently suggested24,25. Non-vertex models of deformable particles
In vitro experiments of cell monolayers on synthetic substrates have instead focused on configurations in non-confluent equilib-
have revealed characteristics of glassy dynamics3,4 and rigidity tran- rium systems, both in the presence26,27 and absence of cell adhe-
sitions5–7, which are thought to be linked to biological function and sion24,28. In contrast, self-propelled particle and Voronoi models that
multiple pathologies. In contrast, suspended epithelial monolayers focus on cell movements on synthetic substrates account for the
are largely solid-like in vitro8 and show evidence of fracture in vivo9. dynamics of the system and predict rigidity transitions that depend
Experiments with embryonic tissues have shown characteristics on cell density and self-propulsion29,30. All these descriptions cap-
of glassy dynamics in cell movements10, viscous behaviour at long ture some important aspects of the problem, but each neglects a
timescales11 and also structural signatures reminiscent of jamming subset of key cell behaviours and/or restricts the allowed configura-
transitions12, with cell divisions, cell shape and/or changes in cell tions. No current theoretical description accounts for all observed
adhesion suspected to play a role in the control of these emergent relevant cell behaviours in a common framework, hindering our
behaviours5,11,13,14. Recent in vivo experiments in developing zebraf- understanding of how cells control the emergent physical state of
ish embryos showed the existence of a rigidity transition underly- the tissue.
ing the formation of the vertebrate body axis, revealing a functional
role of rigidity transitions in embryonic development15 (Fig. 1a). Dynamic vertex model with extracellular spaces
Both the presence of adhesion-dependent spaces between cells To study the dynamics of embryonic tissues and their physical state,
(Fig. 1b–d) and the dynamics of cell–cell contacts (Fig. 1e,f) were we generalize two-dimensional (2D) vertex models by account-
shown to influence the physical state of the tissue15. However, the ing for (1) extracellular spaces (Fig. 1b,c,g and Methods), (2) the
relative roles of cell adhesion and cell–cell contact dynamics in the stochastic dynamics of active cortical tensions (Fig. 1e,f) and (3)
control of posterior tissue fluidization are still unclear. In general, complex cell shapes (Fig. 1a,g and Methods). Unlike previous vertex
little is known about how different cell behaviours control rigidity models, we do not assume the existence of a preferred cell perim-
transitions and tissue fluidization in embryonic tissues, and whether eter, as experimental evidence for this constraint is lacking. Instead,
all these observed emergent phenomena share a common since cells actively control adhesion, cortical tension and osmotic
physical origin. pressure1,2, we derive a physical description reminiscent of foams
The physical behaviour of multicellular systems has been stud- but with active tension dynamics. Tissue dynamics and structure,
ied theoretically using various approaches. Vertex models16–21 and as well as cell movements and their shapes, are all determined
cellular Potts models22,23 account for cell geometry and use equi- by the dynamics of vertices (Fig. 1g), which follow from force
librium formulations to describe the physical state of the system. balance, namely
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. 2Center for Bioengineering, University of California,
1
Santa Barbara, CA, USA. 3Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. 4California
NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. 5Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
✉e-mail: [email protected]
a b e Tension fluctuations
0 I
(a.u.)
e Cell adhesion 2 200
Forc strength, W
le
dipo 4
6
0
0 100 200 300
Cortical tension, T Time (s)
d 4 f
c Extracellular spaces N=3
Junctional tension
(µm)
L0
∆T
Is
(a.u.) Cell
2 T0
200 0 100
Total area of system AT
Time (s)
N = 25 Time
Force
dipole
0
Til
Nik
Tjk
Nil
Tik
Nil Njk
Nij
Tij
Til
Fig. 1 | Characteristics of multicellular systems and simulation framework. a, Confocal section of embryonic tissue in a zebrafish embryo (membranes
labelled, yellow). b, Schematics of cortical tension and adhesion at cell–cell contacts in a multicellular system with spaces (red) between cells (grey).
c, Confocal section through zebrafish embryonic tissues showing the intensity (Is) of fluorescent reporter protein secreted extracellularly as well as cell
membranes (green), indicating the presence of extracellular spaces (red range). d, Schematics defining the cell size L0, cell number N and simulation
box area AT, which specify cell density. e, Top: kymograph of membrane signal intensity (I) along a tissue region (pink, left) containing a cell–cell contact,
showing contact length ℓ fluctuations (bottom). f, Top: simulated tension fluctuations causing cell–cell contact length fluctuations. Bottom: increasing
(decreasing) tension shortens (lengthens) cell–cell junctions. g, Schematics of the dynamic vertex model formulation. Triple vertices (physical vertices,
red) and non-physical intermediate vertices (blue) are shown. Scale bars, 10 μm.
dRα dTij
ηR Tij Θ(Tij ) + Nij , (1) τT = −(Tij − T0ij ) + ΔTξ , (2)
∑ ( )
dt
= dt
i,j∈F(α)
where ΔT is the amplitude of tension fluctuations and ξ is Gaussian
where t is time, Rα is the position of the vertex α, ηR is a friction white noise (Fig. 1f and Methods). The fixed point effective ten-
coefficient characterizing the dissipation associated with moving a sions depend on both the average cortical tension, T0, and average
vertex, Tij is the effective tension at the contact between cell i and j strength of cell–cell adhesion, W, which, like ΔT, are different at
(with F(α) representing the set of all cells sharing vertex α) and Nij is cell–cell contacts and free cell boundaries (Fig. 1b and Methods).
the normal forces acting on vertex α. Θ(⋅) represents the Heaviside Scaling all quantities, we obtain the relevant dimension-
step function and prevents unrealistic negative tensions15,31. Normal less parameters (Table 1 and Methods). Since P0L0/T0 and τT/τR
forces arise from osmotic pressure differences in adjacent cells and (Table 1) can be estimated from existing experimental data
are given by Nij = (ΔPi − ΔPj) Lij/2 (Methods), where Lij and ΔPi (Methods), we focus on the parameter space spanned by ΔT/T0,
(ΔPj) are, respectively, the contour length of the contact between W/T0 and the normalized cell density ρ (Table 1).
cells i and j and the osmotic pressure difference across cell i (j).
To capture the observed fluctuating nature and finite persis- Structural transitions and mechanics of equilibrium
tence of tension dynamics15, Tij, we describe them as an Ornstein– systems
Uhlenbeck process, with a tension that fluctuates around a fixed We first explore how the states and mechanics of the system change
point T0ij and has a persistence time τT (refs. 32,33), specifically if spaces between cells are allowed. In the absence of tension
NE /2N
ϕ=1 0.5 0.81
1.2 0.9
Non-confluent 5
z
0 1
ρ
z
2
ϕ= 0.8 3
1.0 0.9 30 4
ϕ= 5
0.8 20 4 6
AE /A0
4
ρ
6
Cell density, ρ
0.9 4.2
1.0 3
z=
0.8 s
z
4.0
=
2
4
0.8 0.7
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 3.8
Relative adhesion, W/T0
W/T0 W/T0 1.6 1.8 2.0
W/T0
h i j k σY/σ0
Shear (affine) ρ = 1 W/T 0.4 1.4
1.2 ρ=1
0.4
transformation ∆T/T0 = 0 0
1.5 ∆T/T0 = 0
0.9 1.0 0.3
1.2 0.3
σxy (t)/σ0
0.5
σY/σ0
0.10
0.25
0.2 0.2
0.6
ρ
0 0.2
1.0
0.25
1.0 1.0
0.1
Fig. 2 | Equilibrium configurations and structural transitions. a–c, Representative equilibrium configurations (a), volume fraction ϕ (b) and mean
number of neighbours z (c) for varying values of relative adhesion W/T0 and cell density ρ. Green and purple boxes in a correspond to parameter values
specified as circle dots of the same colour in b and c. d, Number NE (top) and average area ĀE (bottom) of extracellular spaces for varying relative cell
adhesion and different cell densities, showing a sharp structural transition at W/T0 ≈ 0.23 (grey line) leading to the opening of large extracellular spaces.
e, Lowering (dashed line) and increasing (dash-dotted line) relative adhesion quasistatically shows bistable states and strong hysteresis in equilibrium
configurations. Equilibrium quenched states are also shown (solid line). f, Average neighbour number (cell contacts) z as the system volume fraction
changes at vanishing cell adhesion, showing the existence of a jamming transition at ϕc ≃ 0.83 and zc = 4 (configuration shown in inset). Power-law fits
z − zc = z0 (ϕ − ϕc )1/2 + z1 (ϕ − ϕc ) with coefficients z0 ≃ 1.45 and z1 ≃ 10.45 (red line) and with z0 ≃ 4.85 and z1 = 0 (grey line) are shown. g, Average
shape factor ( s̄ ) for varying relative adhesion showing a sharp increase at W/T0 = 2 (vanishing tensions), leading to anisotropic cell shapes (inset),
recapitulating density-independent transitions. h, Schematics of a simple shear deformation imposing a large strain step (ϵxy = 1.5), with associated
temporal evolution of both strain and shear stress. i, Temporal relaxation of shear stress σxy (normalized to σ0 ≡ ρ T0 /L0) after the imposed strain step
√
for varying adhesion levels. j,k, Dependence of the yield stress σY on the relative adhesion strength (j) and on both cell density and relative adhesion (k),
showing a maximum at the structural transition between confluent and non-confluent states (green line). Error bands, s.d.; N = 20 (b–d,f,g) and N = 10
(e,i–k) independent simulations for each parameter set.
a b
101 1.0 ∆T/T0 = 0.5
Magnitude
100 usion of tension
0.5 Diff
α
fluctuations
10–1
∆T/T0
0
MSD (t)/L20
10–2 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.50
∆T/T0
10 –3 1.25
Caged
1.00
10–4 ∆T/T0 = 1.5
0.75
10–5 0.50
ρ = 1, W/T0 = 1
10–6 0.25
10–2 10–1 100 101 102
t/τT
c d
100
10–2
2
10–3
10–4
1
10–5
0 10–6
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 0 0.4 0.8 1.2
W/T0 W/T0
Fig. 3 | Tissue dynamics with finite tension fluctuations. a, MSD for varying magnitudes of tension fluctuations ΔT/T0, showing subdiffusive (0 < α < 1)
and diffusive (α = 1) behaviours as tension fluctuations increase (inset). b, Snapshots of dynamic configurations with examples of cell trajectories over
t/τT = 102. c, MSD at long timescales (t = 102τT ≫ τT > τR), showing non-monotonous behaviour for varying relative adhesion strength and minimal values
at the structural transition. d, Cellular NE rate for varying relative adhesion. Distinct types of NE event: gain/loss of cell contacts (left) and T1 transitions
(right). Cells and junctions undergoing NE events are highlighted as yellow/blue and red colour, respectively. Error bands, s.d.; N = 10 independent
simulations for each set of parameters.
equilibrium configurations if adhesion or cortical tension are var- vanishes when effective tensions vanish (Fig. 2i and Supplementary
ied in a quasi-static manner (Fig. 2e, Supplementary Video 1 and Fig. 5). Subsequently, shear stress relaxes with a characteristic times-
Methods). Some of the predicted system configurations (Fig. 2a) cale τR towards a constant value at long timescales, namely the yield
are analogous to those previously obtained for equilibrium systems stress σY (ref. 39), which depends non-monotonically on cell adhe-
with open boundaries27, but the bistability and hysteresis of configu- sion (Fig. 2j and Supplementary Video 2). For low relative adhesion
rations reported here can only be observed in closed systems that W/T0, the system is non-confluent and the yield stress increases with
more closely resemble epithelial tissues. increasing adhesion as extracellular spaces close down. In contrast,
In the limit of vanishing cell adhesion, the system should behave for adhesion values leading to confluence, increasing W/T0 leads to
as foams/emulsions, which display a jamming transition at a criti- a decreasing yield stress due to lower effective tensions. Vanishing
cal value ϕc. The isostatic condition (zc = 4 in 2D) sets the critical yield stress indicates a fluid tissue state, which occurs only for
volume fraction ϕc ≈ 0.83 of the system36 (Fig. 2f). Both this ϕc value W/T0 = 0 and W/T0 = 2 and corresponds to the jamming transition
and the power-law dependence of z (Fig. 2f) are in agreement with (Fig. 2f) and the density-independent rigidity transition (Fig. 2g),
recent equilibrium simulations of deformable particles28, indicat- respectively, with the tissue being solid for all other values in the
ing that our description accurately describes the foam limit. In 0 < W/T0 < 2 range. These results show that equilibrium systems are
the confluent limit, previous works reported density-independent maximally rigid at the structural transition between confluent and
rigidity transitions,
√ which are controlled by the cell shape factor non-confluent states (Fig. 2j,k), with increasing adhesion render-
s ( s = P/ A, with P and A being the cell perimeter and the area, ing the system more rigid in non-confluent systems and doing the
respectively). The system switches from a solid to a fluid state at opposite in confluent states.
approximately sc ≃ 3.81, with cells transiting from isotropic to
anisotropic shapes17,37,38. The fluid state in these descriptions is Dynamics of active multicellular systems
characterized by vanishing effective tensions (T0ij = 0), allowing Unlike equilibrium systems, tension dynamics at cell–cell con-
neighbour exchanges (NEs) at no energetic cost19. Setting W/T0 = 2 tacts can drive cell movements, NEs and cell shape changes
in our framework leads to vanishing effective tensions and a sharp (Supplementary Videos 3 and 4). At timescales longer than all
increase in average shape factor due to the emergence of anisotropic characteristic timescales (t ≫ τT > τR), cell movements are caged for
cell shape (Fig. 2g), recapitulating density-independent transitions. small ΔT/T0, as indicated by the saturation of the mean squared
To directly assess the physical state of the system, we monitor displacement (MSD) and bounded cell trajectories (Fig. 3a,b and
shear-stress relaxation after imposing an affine deformation (Fig. 2h Methods). For increasing magnitudes of tension fluctuations, cell
and Methods). The initial stress jump is largest with no adhesion and uncaging starts to occur and the asymptotic behaviour of the MSD
σxy (t )/σ0
10–2
∆T/T0
1.0 4
ϕ
0.6 100 101 102 10
∆T/T0 0.90
t/τR 10–2 s = 4.08
1.5 103
1.0 ∆T/T0 = 1.0
0.3
0.5 Confluent 102
10–3 0.85
0
0.5
0 101
10–1 100 101 102 100 101 102 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 0 0.4 0.8 1.2
t/τR t/τR W/T0 W/T0
e g s = 3.89
1.5
∆T/T0
τSR/τT = 10 2
4.2 ∆T/T0 = 0.5
c Onset of applied shear
1.5
1.25
0.75
0.50
Passive NE
1.00 0.25
Fluid 4.0
∆T/T0
Passive NE 1.0
s
Active NE
NE rate
Solid
3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 >4.6
0.5
3.6 s
0 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 0 0.4 0.8 1.2
Time Tension fluctuations
W/T0 W/T0
Fig. 4 | Stress relaxation and structure in active multicellular systems. a,b, Stress relaxation (a) and temporal changes in cellular NE rate (b) after the
imposed strain step for varying magnitudes of tension fluctuations. The long timescale stress relaxation follows stretched exponentials (black dashed
lines) and eventually reaches the average value σA of active shear-stress fluctuations (horizontal lines in inset). The cellular NE rate quickly decays to zero
in the absence of activity (t ≈ τR), but remains finite in the presence of activity. c, Sketch showing the dynamics NE induced by the externally applied shear
strain (passive) and by tension fluctuations in cells (active). Active NE enables further stress relaxation and tissue fluidization after the initial passively
induced NE. d, Stress relaxation timescale τSR for varying magnitude of tension fluctuations and relative adhesion, showing a sharp increase as the structural
transition between non-confluent and confluent (green background) states. e, Phase diagram showing the transition between fluid and solid tissue states
for different activity values and relative adhesion strength. Solid states surround the structural transition and are found both in confluent and non-confluent
configurations for low enough activity. f–h, Dependence of the system volume fraction ϕ (f) and average shape factor s̄ (g; with red/blue squares indicating
fluid/solid states, respectively) on relative adhesion for different magnitudes of tension fluctuations. Representative snapshots of dynamic configurations for
fixed relative adhesion (W/T0 = 1; vertical dashed line in g) and increasing tension fluctuations are shown h, with red and blue outlines indicating fluid and
solid states, respectively. Error bands, s.d.; N = 10 independent simulations for each set of parameters.
for t ≫ τT becomes a power law (MSD ≈ tα), with an exponent α that displaying a slow stress decay rather than plateauing to a yield stress
increases with activity (Fig. 3a, inset). This evidences subdiffusive (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Video 5). This long timescale stress
(α < 1) cell movements for intermediate activities, and diffusive relaxation is driven by actively induced T1 transitions (Fig. 4b), and
(α = 1) behaviour for large enough tension fluctuations (Fig. 3a,b). can be accurately described by a stretched-exponential function
Comparing MSD values at long timescales (t = 102τT ≫ τT > τR) (Fig. 4a, inset), as previously done to explain the dynamics of systems
shows that increasing tension fluctuations always leads to higher with a large number of intrinsic timescales40,41. The stress relaxation
cell movements, regardless of cell adhesion strength, as recently timescale, τSR, at which shear stress reaches the level of active shear
reported for confluent systems33. However, for a fixed level of activ- stress in the unperturbed system (Fig. 4a, inset, and Supplementary
ity, MSD values vary non-monotonically as adhesion increases, Fig. 2), varies by over five orders of magnitude as the magnitude of
displaying very reduced cell movements at the transition between tension fluctuations or relative adhesion change slightly (Fig. 4d).
non-confluent and confluent states (Fig. 3c). Similar to the MSD, While larger activity values reduce τSR monotonically, increasing
the NE rate displays analogous non-monotonic behaviour, with the relative adhesion strength leads to non-monotonic changes in
minimal NE events at the structural transition. Close to confluence τSR, which rapidly increases in non-confluent states and displays the
for high adhesion levels, the NE rate is dominated by T1 transitions opposite behaviour in confluent states. The largest stress relaxation
and related to the MSD by MSD(t = 102 τ T ) ≈ k3/4 NE (Extended Data timescale occurs at the structural transition between non-confluent
Fig. 1), with the timescale for T1 transitions, 1/kNE, diverging as the and confluent states, indicating that tissues are minimally fluid at
activity vanishes, a signature of glassy dynamics. In contrast, at low long timescales close to this structural transition (Fig. 4d), consis-
adhesion levels leading to non-confluent states, loss and formation tent with the predicted low cell movements and NE rates close to the
of new cell contacts dominate NE events (Fig. 3d) and the MSD and transition (Fig. 3c,d).
NE behaviours differ close to jamming. The non-monotonic behav- In contrast to previous equilibrium vertex models, our results
iour of both MSD and NE events, with minimal values at the transi- show that a given tissue can behave as a fluid or a solid depend-
tion between non-confluent and confluent states, suggests that the ing on the time necessary to form embryonic structures. If the
non-equilibrium system is also maximally solid-like at the struc- characteristic timescale τd of developmental processes is larger
tural transition. (smaller) than the stress relaxation timescale τSR, namely τd/τSR ≫ 1
(τd/τSR ≪ 1), the tissue behaves as a fluid (solid). Using typical devel-
Physical state of active multicellular systems opmental timescales (τd ≈ 1–2 h; τd/τT ≈ 102), we obtain the tissue
To study the rigidity of active systems, we apply a shear-strain step phase diagram (Fig. 4e). Over a critical value of tension fluctuations,
and monitor stress relaxation, as described above (Fig. 2h). The the tissue is always fluid regardless of cell adhesion levels. Below
presence of finite tension fluctuations qualitatively changes stress that critical activity value, the tissue is fluid at both low and high
relaxation at long timescales compared with equilibrium systems, adhesion levels, but solid in between, in the region of the phase
a e f j A P
6
Average
A P 0.20
A
Normalized
L
frequency
Posterior
Dorsal view
4 0.15
body
M
MPZ MPZ
elongation bleb
M
2 PSM MPZ
P
PSM MPZ
Simulations
V D 0
0 0.5 1.0
–1
b c g h
R 2 4 0 5 10 15
Before
0.4
(b – b0)/R
NE rate
Experiments
–2
NE count (per cell)
b
(×10
0 2
Cumulative
–10 0 10 30 50 0 20 40
1
Magnetic
actuation
Normalized MSRD
d 10 0 MPZ
Cell
3 uncaging
NE rate
0.5 1
Caged cells
relaxation
0
Droplet
10–1 2
Stretched 0 20 40 0
–2
exponential fit 0 10 20 30
(×10
0 Time (min) 1
Time (min)
<15 m
>40 m
MPZ
MPZ
bleb
0 10 30 50 10
0
101 102
AD
AD
Time (min) Time (min)
Fig. 5 | Stress relaxation and tissue fluidization in posterior tissues during body axis elongation. a, Lateral view of a zebrafish embryo (scale bar,
200 μm) and sketches showing lateral and dorsal views of posterior tissues, indicating the fluid-like MPZ and solid-like PSM (ventral, V; dorsal, D; anterior,
A; posterior, P; medial, M; lateral, L). A confocal section showing a portion of the MPZ (cell membranes, yellow) with a magnetic droplet (magenta) is
highlighted. b, Schematic sketches and confocal snapshots of magnetic droplet actuation in the MPZ tissue. c, Time evolution of the strain, (b − b0)/R,
before, during and after magnetic actuation. d, Relaxation of anisotropic stress σA(t) after magnetic actuation in both linear and log-linear scales, with
σ0A = σA (t = 0). The fit (black line) corresponds to a stretched-exponential function. e, Example of NE events: cells in contact (blue line) before the
T1 transition (cyan; top) and not in contact after the transition (bottom). f, Normalized frequency of amplitude of junctional length fluctuations for the
MPZ, both in the absence and presence of blebbistatin (bleb; average amplitudes in inset). g, Cumulative NE events in the MPZ (away from the droplet,
cyan; dashed black line shows linear fit) and in the close neighbourhood of the droplet (around droplet, red). Inset: visual definition of droplet neighborhood
(red). h, Temporal evolution of NE rate in the MPZ (cyan) and in the region around droplet (red). Initial (t < 15 min) and final (t > 40 min) stages of droplet
relaxation are highlighted as green and pink shaded regions, respectively. i, Average NE rates in the region around droplet (AD, both during initial droplet
relaxation (green) and at its final stages (pink)) and in the MPZ, both in the absence (cyan) and presence (orange) of blebbistatin. j, Experimentally
measured and simulated dynamics of cell shapes in both the MPZ and the PSM, showing faster dynamics in the MPZ and largely static cell boundaries in
the PSM. Experimental data are an average intensity projection of a confocal section timelapse. k, MSRD shows uncaging behaviour for the MPZ but caged
for the PSM of both wild-type and cdh2−/− embryos. Error bands, s.d. (d,g) and s.e.m (i,k); N = 10 (d), N = 298 from 4 embryos (g–i, AD), N = 396 from
3 embryos (g–i, MPZ). Data in f, MPZ bleb in i and MSRD for MPZ and PSM in wild-type embryos in k were reanalysed from ref. 15. Scale bars, 10 μm,
unless otherwise stated.
diagram surrounding the structural transition between from vanishing junctional tensions in fluid states17, the large shape
non-confluent and confluent states. This non-monotonic behaviour factors reported here are due to spatiotemporal tension fluctua-
mirrors the behaviour of NE and cell movements, but care must be tions (Fig. 4h), with cell–cell contacts maintaining finite tensions
taken in inferring the physical state of the system solely from cel- (Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Video 6), as observed
lular movements (Extended Data Fig. 2). While cell density and cell experimentally31,42. In particular, we find the presence of both fluid
shape are the control parameters associated with jamming transi- and solid tissue states for adhesion values in the range 0 < W/T0 < 2
tions and density-independent transitions, respectively, our results that would correspond solely to solid states in previous equilibrium
show that tension fluctuations control a distinct rigidity transition descriptions. These results indicate that the tissue fluid or solid state
in both confluent and non-confluent states, as suggested recently cannot be inferred from static measurements of cell shape factor
for confluent states33. only, as the tissue physical state and its structure depend strongly on
To relate the mechanics of the system to its structure in the pres- the magnitude of tension fluctuations (Fig. 4g,h).
ence of tension dynamics, we study the configurations of the system.
Tension fluctuations generally promote transitions from confluent Fluidization of embryonic tissues
to non-confluent states by opening up extracellular spaces at weak Our theoretical results indicate that in the presence of active ten-
regions (Fig. 4f), implying that larger adhesion values are required sion fluctuations, active NE events control stress relaxation at long
to reach confluent states for increasing ΔT/T0. This effect becomes timescales both in confluent and non-confluent tissues. To experi-
negligible for large cell densities (ρ > 1) and volume fraction is mentally address the role of tension fluctuations in stress relaxation
then solely determined by cell density ρ and relative cell adhesion and tissue fluidization, we employed magnetically responsive oil
W/T0 (Supplementary Fig. 3). While cell shapes are only moder- droplets to directly measure strain and stress relaxation in posterior
ately affected by tension fluctuations in non-confluent regimes, tissues of developing zebrafish embryos (Fig. 5a), as these tissues
with low shape factors associated with rounder cells, increasing ten- have been previously shown to be in a fluid-like state15. After inject-
sion fluctuations in confluent regimes leads to substantially larger ing a single droplet in the mesodermal progenitor zone (MPZ),
shape factors (Fig. 4g,h). In contrast to density-independent transi- we induced large droplet deformations of multiple cell diameters
tions, where large shape factors (above approximately 3.81) result by applying a controlled magnetic field for a 15 min period15,43
Extended Data Fig. 1 | Power law relation between NE rate and MSD at long timescales. Power law relation between long time MSD values and NE rate
when the systems are close to confluence for high adhesion levels. NE rate and longtime MSD show a power law relation with an exponent of 0.75.
Extended Data Fig. 2 | Comparison of solid/fluid phase diagrams obtained from stress relaxation and from cell movements. Solid/fluid phase diagrams
determined by mechanical measurement of stress relaxation (left) and cell movements, MSD=1/2 (middle) and MSD=1/4 (right). Green region indicates
confluent states.
Reporting Summary
Nature Research wishes to improve the reproducibility of the work that we publish. This form provides structure for consistency and transparency
in reporting. For further information on Nature Research policies, see our Editorial Policies and the Editorial Policy Checklist.
Statistics
For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section.
n/a Confirmed
The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement
A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly
The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one- or two-sided
Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted
Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.
For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings
For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes
Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated
Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.
Data analysis Commercial software used to analyze data: Imaris 9.3 (Bitplane) and Matlab 9.6 (MathWorks). ImageJ was also used to analyze data.
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors and
reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Research guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.
Data
Policy information about availability of data
All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable:
- Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets
- A list of figures that have associated raw data
- A description of any restrictions on data availability
April 2020
Source data supporting these findings are available online as Supplementary Data.
1
nature research | reporting summary
Field-specific reporting
Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.
Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences
For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf
Replication Independent experiments were performed and statistical analysis done independently of these data sets. The results obtained were the same
within error bars in different, independent data sets.
Randomization No specific experimental groups were defined and all data was considered.
Blinding Analysis was done by automated software which was blind to data collection.
Ethics oversight Animal husbandry and experiments were done according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
(IACUC) at the University of California Santa Barbara.
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.
April 2020