Occupational Health Service Functions
Occupational Health Service Functions
Categories of Hazards
Hazards are broadly classified into six main categories:
1. Physical Hazards
Explanation:
These are environmental factors that can harm the body without necessarily
touching it. Physical hazards are the most common in many workplaces.
Examples:
Noise (e.g., loud machinery in factories)
Vibration (e.g., hand-held power tools)
Radiation (e.g., X-rays in healthcare)
Temperature extremes (e.g., heat in steel plants, cold storage warehouses)
Slips, trips, and falls (e.g., wet floors in public buildings)
Advantages (of recognition and control):
Easy to detect and measure.
Controls such as PPE, barriers, or isolation are straightforward to
implement.
Disadvantages:
Often overlooked because exposure may accumulate slowly (e.g., hearing
loss from chronic noise exposure).
Can cause irreversible harm if unmanaged (e.g., permanent hearing
damage).
2. Chemical Hazards
Explanation:
Chemical hazards arise from exposure to hazardous substances which may cause
poisoning, burns, respiratory problems, or cancer.
Examples:
Acids and alkalis (e.g., battery acid)
Gases (e.g., carbon monoxide)
Dust (e.g., silica dust in construction)
Fumes (e.g., welding fumes)
Solvents and pesticides
Advantages (of recognition and control):
Well-established guidelines and exposure limits exist.
Proper labelling and storage can mitigate risks.
Disadvantages:
Can be invisible and odourless (e.g., carbon monoxide), making detection
difficult.
Some chemicals have long-term health impacts that only become
apparent after years of exposure (e.g., asbestos-related lung disease).
3. Biological Hazards
Explanation:
Biological hazards are infectious agents or materials of biological origin that pose
a threat to human health.
Examples:
Bacteria (e.g., tuberculosis)
Viruses (e.g., Hepatitis B, HIV)
Fungi and moulds (e.g., black mould in damp buildings)
Parasites (e.g., malaria-carrying mosquitoes)
Contaminated materials like blood or bodily fluids in healthcare
Advantages (of recognition and control):
Vaccinations and proper hygiene measures can prevent many infections.
PPE and standard operating procedures reduce exposure risks.
Disadvantages:
Exposure may occur without immediate symptoms (latent infections).
Difficult to completely eliminate biological agents from healthcare and
research environments.
4. Ergonomic Hazards
Explanation:
These result from poor workplace design or repetitive tasks that strain the body.
Examples:
Poor workstation design leading to back pain.
Repetitive motions causing carpal tunnel syndrome.
Lifting heavy objects improperly.
Advantages (of recognition and control):
Improvements are often low-cost (e.g., adjustable chairs, repositioning of
equipment).
Leads to increased productivity and reduced sick leave.
Disadvantages:
Ergonomic hazards are often underestimated or misunderstood.
Improper posture or repetitive strain injuries develop over time and may
not be immediately noticed.
5. Psychosocial Hazards
Explanation:
These arise from workplace stressors that affect mental health and well-being.
Examples:
High workload and unrealistic deadlines.
Bullying or harassment at work.
Job insecurity.
Poor work-life balance.
Advantages (of recognition and control):
Implementing employee assistance programs and mental health initiatives
can reduce absenteeism and improve morale.
Flexible work policies can enhance employee satisfaction.
Disadvantages:
Difficult to quantify or measure compared to physical hazards.
Stigma around mental health can prevent workers from seeking help.
6. Mechanical Hazards
Explanation:
Mechanical hazards are associated with the use of machines or equipment that
can cause physical injury.
Examples:
Moving machine parts (e.g., conveyor belts)
Unguarded machinery leading to entanglement or crushing injuries.
Tools and equipment malfunctions.
Advantages (of recognition and control):
Clear standards exist for guarding and maintenance.
Training significantly reduces accident rates.
Disadvantages:
Human error remains a significant risk factor.
Unexpected machine failure can still cause injury despite safeguards.
Conclusion
A comprehensive understanding and categorisation of workplace hazards are
essential for effective occupational health and safety management. Each type of
hazard poses unique challenges and requires tailored preventive and control
measures. Occupational health professionals play a crucial role in hazard
identification, assessment, and mitigation to protect the health and safety of
workers across diverse industries.
the principles of hazard control, following the structured format: definition,
explanation, examples, advantages, disadvantages. Each principle will be
developed to at least 1½ pages as you asked.
The internationally recognised hierarchy of hazard control includes these key
principles:
1. Elimination
2. Substitution
3. Engineering Controls
4. Administrative Controls
5. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
I will now provide Principle 1: Elimination as the first full example. Once you
approve the style and depth, I will proceed with the remaining four.
1. Elimination
Definition
Elimination is the most effective hazard control principle. It involves physically
removing the hazard from the workplace so that exposure is impossible. When a
hazard no longer exists, there is no risk of it causing harm. Elimination is
positioned at the top of the hierarchy of controls because it permanently
removes danger, offering the highest level of protection.
Explanation
Elimination addresses hazards at their root. It can occur during the design phase
of a workplace, process, or equipment selection, or by changing operational
procedures. It often requires a fundamental redesign of a process or workflow to
avoid the use of dangerous substances or dangerous tasks entirely.
The success of elimination depends heavily on collaboration between engineers,
safety professionals, and management at the earliest possible stage. Retrofitting
elimination measures into existing operations can be difficult and costly.
Elimination is most practical for hazards that are obvious and persistent. It may
also involve discontinuing certain operations that carry unacceptable risks. For
example, instead of working at heights to clean a window, installing automated
window cleaning systems eliminates the need for workers to be exposed to fall
hazards.
Examples
Chemical Elimination: Removing a highly toxic chemical from a
production process and replacing it with a safer or mechanical process.
Work at Height: Designing factory equipment to be serviced at ground
level, removing the need for ladders or scaffolding.
Manual Handling: Using automated machines to eliminate the need for
workers to lift heavy loads, reducing musculoskeletal injury risks.
Confined Spaces: Modifying facility layouts to eliminate confined space
requirements altogether.
A real-world example can be found in manufacturing where robotic arms replace
workers in dangerous welding processes, eliminating the hazard of burns and
inhalation of fumes.
Advantages
Complete Risk Removal: The hazard is completely removed, eliminating
the potential for incidents related to that hazard.
Long-term Cost Savings: Once the hazard is eliminated, there are no
ongoing costs associated with training, PPE, medical surveillance, or
compensation.
Regulatory Compliance: Supports compliance with occupational safety
regulations and enhances the company’s reputation for safe operations.
Increased Productivity: Workers can operate without constant safety
restrictions, leading to smoother and faster processes.
Disadvantages
Feasibility Challenges: Elimination is not always practical, especially for
hazards integral to production (e.g., heat in metal foundries).
High Initial Cost: The redesign of equipment, processes, or facilities to
eliminate hazards can require substantial upfront investment.
Potential for Process Disruption: Stopping the use of certain materials
or processes might interfere with production flow or product quality.
Limited Applicability in Existing Operations: Elimination works best
during design phases and is often difficult to implement in long-
established environments.
2. Substitution
Definition
Substitution is the process of replacing a hazardous material, equipment, or
process with one that is less hazardous or poses a lower risk to health and safety.
It sits second on the hierarchy of controls, immediately after elimination, and
offers a proactive strategy for reducing workplace hazards when elimination is
not feasible.
Explanation
Substitution aims to reduce the risk of exposure rather than completely remove
the hazard. It involves a careful evaluation of possible alternatives to ensure that
the replacement does not introduce new risks or create additional hazards. The
effectiveness of substitution relies heavily on risk assessment, cost-benefit
analysis, and knowledge of the properties of both the original and alternative
materials or processes.
The decision to substitute must involve multidisciplinary teams, including health
and safety professionals, process engineers, and occupational hygienists, to
assess whether the substitute meets operational requirements without
compromising safety.
Substitution can be applied to materials (e.g., using a less toxic solvent),
processes (e.g., switching from manual welding to automated laser cutting), or
even tasks (e.g., using drones to inspect high structures instead of workers).
Examples
Chemical Substitution: Replacing benzene, a known carcinogen, with
toluene, which is less toxic, in industrial cleaning processes.
Material Substitution: Using water-based paints instead of solvent-
based paints to reduce exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
Tool Substitution: Replacing handheld grinders with fixed grinding
machines that have better dust extraction controls.
Process Substitution: Substituting abrasive blasting with wet blasting to
reduce airborne dust levels.
A practical example is found in electronics manufacturing, where lead-based
solder (toxic) has been replaced with lead-free alternatives to prevent lead
poisoning risks.
Advantages
Reduced Health Risks: Significantly lowers employee exposure to
hazardous substances or conditions.
Regulatory Compliance: Supports compliance with occupational safety
and environmental regulations by removing or reducing dangerous
materials.
Improved Work Conditions: Less hazardous environments result in
higher employee morale and reduced absenteeism due to work-related
illnesses.
Lower Operational Costs in the Long Term: Less need for intensive
personal protective equipment (PPE), health monitoring, and costly
emergency response plans.
Disadvantages
Potential Introduction of New Hazards: Substitutes may carry their
own risks, which must be thoroughly evaluated (e.g., toluene is less toxic
than benzene but still harmful).
Operational Compatibility Issues: The substitute may not perform as
efficiently, leading to potential reductions in product quality or process
speed.
Higher Initial Costs: Substitution may require retraining staff, modifying
equipment, or adjusting production processes.
Availability Constraints: Suitable and cost-effective substitutes are not
always available in the market.
3. Engineering Controls
Definition
Engineering controls are physical modifications to the workplace, equipment,
or processes that reduce or eliminate exposure to hazards. This method isolates
workers from risks by incorporating design features that prevent the hazard from
occurring or limit access to it. Engineering controls rank third in the hierarchy of
controls and are considered more effective than administrative controls or PPE
because they act directly on the hazard source.
Explanation
The goal of engineering controls is to design safety into the system. These
controls target the hazard at its source rather than relying on worker behaviour
or protective equipment. They can involve enclosing the hazard, providing local
ventilation, designing safer machines, or introducing automation to remove
workers from dangerous tasks.
Engineering controls are often incorporated into the design phase of equipment
or facilities. However, retrofitting older work environments with engineering
solutions is also possible. They tend to provide continuous protection with
minimal human intervention once implemented correctly.
This approach is especially important for physical, chemical, and mechanical
hazards. Engineering solutions are also considered fail-safe, as they do not rely
on employee compliance like administrative controls or PPE.
Examples
Enclosures: Placing noisy machinery in soundproof rooms to reduce
exposure to excessive noise.
Ventilation Systems: Installing local exhaust ventilation (LEV) systems
to capture hazardous fumes at the source, such as in welding or laboratory
environments.
Machine Guarding: Fitting moving parts of machines with guards to
prevent contact that could cause amputation or crushing injuries.
Automation: Using robotic arms to perform dangerous tasks, such as
handling corrosive chemicals, thereby removing human exposure.
Noise Control: Designing buildings with sound-absorbing materials to
reduce noise levels in manufacturing plants.
A well-known example is seen in automotive manufacturing, where robots have
replaced human workers for tasks like spot welding and painting in confined
spaces, reducing exposure to heat, fumes, and repetitive strain.
Advantages
High Effectiveness: Provides constant protection without requiring
worker action or intervention.
Reduces Dependence on Human Behaviour: Eliminates the risk of
accidents due to non-compliance with safety procedures.
Cost-Efficient in the Long Term: Although initial costs can be high, the
reduction in injuries and compensation claims saves money over time.
Permanent Solution: Once installed, engineering controls provide a
stable and lasting safety improvement.
Disadvantages
High Initial Investment: Engineering controls may involve costly design
changes, new equipment purchases, or extensive facility modifications.
Potential for System Failure: Poor maintenance or design flaws can
compromise the effectiveness of the controls.
Not Always Feasible: Some hazards, particularly psychosocial or certain
biological risks, cannot be addressed with engineering controls alone.
Complex Implementation: Installing engineering controls can disrupt
production temporarily during setup or retrofitting.
Conclusion for Engineering Controls
Engineering controls offer an excellent long-term solution to hazard
management. They remove much of the risk from human error and can
significantly reduce workplace injuries and illnesses. While they often require
substantial upfront investment, the long-term safety and financial benefits make
them highly valuable for most organisations. Careful design, installation, and
ongoing maintenance are essential to ensure their continued effectiveness.
4. Administrative Controls
Definition
Administrative controls are workplace policies, procedures, training, and
scheduling strategies aimed at reducing employees’ exposure to hazards. Unlike
elimination, substitution, or engineering controls, administrative controls do not
physically remove hazards but limit the likelihood of exposure by altering how
people work. Administrative controls occupy the fourth level in the hierarchy of
controls and are considered a supportive measure when higher-level controls are
impractical.
Explanation
Administrative controls are designed to manage human behaviour and workplace
organisation to mitigate risks. They often complement other control methods or
serve as interim measures while permanent controls are being developed.
Administrative strategies are heavily reliant on compliance and require ongoing
enforcement and management oversight.
This approach encompasses a wide range of interventions, from formal safety
protocols to work-rest cycles, aimed at reducing the duration, frequency, or
intensity of exposure to hazards. Though less reliable than elimination or
engineering controls, administrative measures are often necessary when hazards
cannot be entirely removed or isolated.
Administrative controls are particularly valuable for addressing ergonomic,
psychosocial, and biological hazards where engineering solutions may be limited.
Examples
Work Rotation: Rotating employees between tasks to prevent repetitive
strain injuries, for example, in an assembly line.
Work Hours Management: Limiting the amount of time an employee
spends in a noisy environment to reduce the risk of hearing loss.
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): Documenting and enforcing
proper steps for using equipment safely, such as lockout/tagout
procedures to prevent accidental machine startup during maintenance.
Training and Education: Conducting regular safety training sessions on
the proper use of equipment, emergency response procedures, and hazard
awareness.
Signage and Labels: Posting clear hazard signs, instructions, and
warning labels in hazardous areas such as chemical storage rooms.
Access Controls: Restricting entry to dangerous areas to only trained
and authorised personnel.
A good example is in the healthcare industry, where exposure to infectious
diseases is minimised through administrative controls such as mandatory
training on infection prevention and strict hand hygiene protocols.
Advantages
Flexible and Quick to Implement: Administrative controls can be
applied rapidly compared to engineering modifications.
Cost-Effective: Generally lower upfront costs than engineering controls
or substitution.
Improves Awareness and Safety Culture: Regular training and clear
procedures foster a culture of safety and empower employees to take
ownership of workplace safety.
Customisable: Can be tailored to fit a specific task, department, or
hazard.
Disadvantages
Relies on Human Behaviour: Effectiveness depends on workers
consistently following procedures and management enforcing compliance.
Less Permanent: Administrative controls do not remove the hazard
itself, only reduce the chance of exposure.
Requires Ongoing Effort: Continuous training, monitoring, and
reinforcement are necessary to maintain compliance.
May Not Be Sufficient Alone: Often used as a supplementary measure;
on their own, administrative controls offer a lower level of protection.
Explanation
PPE does not remove the hazard but serves to reduce the severity of injury or
illness if exposure occurs. It is most effective when combined with other control
measures. Reliance solely on PPE is considered poor safety practice, as it places
responsibility on the worker and is susceptible to human error or equipment
failure.
Employers are responsible for providing appropriate PPE, ensuring it fits
correctly, and training employees on its proper use and maintenance. The
selection of PPE must consider the specific hazard, the environment, and the
individual worker.
There are various types of PPE tailored to protect against different risks:
Respiratory Protection: Masks, respirators (e.g., N95 respirators to
protect against airborne particles).
Eye and Face Protection: Goggles, face shields to guard against
splashes or flying particles.
Hearing Protection: Earplugs, earmuffs to prevent noise-induced
hearing loss.
Head Protection: Hard hats to protect against falling objects.
Hand and Arm Protection: Gloves to prevent cuts, burns, chemical
exposure.
Body Protection: Lab coats, aprons, full body suits to protect against
chemicals or extreme temperatures.
Foot Protection: Safety boots with steel toes to protect against crushing
or puncture injuries.
An example of widespread PPE use is in healthcare settings, where gloves,
gowns, masks, and face shields are used to protect workers from infectious
diseases, particularly during outbreaks such as COVID-19.
Examples
Construction: Workers wear hard hats, high-visibility clothing, and steel-
toed boots to reduce the impact of falling objects and slips.
Chemical Laboratories: Lab personnel wear goggles, gloves, and lab
coats to protect against chemical splashes.
Manufacturing Plants: Employees handling sharp metal parts use cut-
resistant gloves and arm guards.
Mining: Miners use respirators to protect against dust and gas inhalation.
A practical example is in welding operations, where welders wear flame-resistant
clothing, heavy-duty gloves, face shields, and safety goggles to protect against
burns and eye damage from bright light and sparks.
Advantages
Provides Immediate Protection: PPE offers a quick solution for
protecting workers from recognised hazards.
Versatile: Can be used across different industries and adapted to a wide
variety of hazards.
Cost-Effective Initially: Generally requires lower upfront investment
compared to engineering controls.
Compliance-Friendly: Many regulatory bodies require specific PPE
standards for certain high-risk jobs.
Disadvantages
Reliance on Human Behaviour: PPE’s effectiveness depends entirely on
workers consistently wearing and properly using the equipment.
Does Not Eliminate the Hazard: The hazard remains present in the
environment, and PPE only reduces the chance or severity of injury.
Uncomfortable or Inconvenient: PPE can be bulky, hot, or restrictive,
leading to poor compliance, especially in hot or physically demanding
environments.
Requires Maintenance and Replacement: PPE must be inspected
regularly for damage and replaced when worn or degraded, leading to
ongoing costs.
Limited Protection: Improperly fitted or inappropriate PPE can provide a
false sense of security.
6. Mechanical Hazards
Explanation:
Minimal in these occupations but may occur from faulty or overloaded electrical
equipment.
Examples:
Electrical fires or shocks from improper home office setups
Trip hazards from poorly managed electrical cords
Preventive Measures:
Use of surge protectors
Safe arrangement of cords and cables
7. Environmental Hazards
Explanation:
Unique to remote and home-based workers who may lack formal safety
inspections.
Examples:
Poor ventilation, excessive noise, or inadequate lighting in home offices
Temperature extremes due to poor home climate control
Preventive Measures:
Ensuring proper home office design
Installing noise and temperature controls
Conclusion
Emerging occupations in cryptocurrency, digital marketing, online Binance
trading, and online betting introduce unique occupational hazards, especially
psychosocial and ergonomic risks. While physical and chemical hazards are
relatively low, the absence of structured workplace environments makes self-
management of risks more critical. Employers, platform providers, and individual
workers must take proactive steps to identify and control these evolving risks,
including promoting mental well-being, ergonomic safety, and responsible
working practices.