Syntax Course 1 May 2025
Syntax Course 1 May 2025
Elghazi
INTRODUCTION TO SYNTAX
This chapter introduces the core concepts of syntax, the branch of linguistics
concerned with sentence structure. We will explore how words group together to
form phrases and clauses, how grammatical relationships are established, and how
to classify words into different categories based on their properties. Understanding
these foundational elements is crucial for analyzing and describing language
structure.
1. What is Syntax?
Syntax is the study of how words are combined to form larger units like phrases,
clauses, and sentences. It investigates the rules and principles that govern sentence
structure in a language. Think of syntax as the "grammar" that dictates the
permissible arrangements of words.
Meaning: Word order and structure are critical for conveying intended
meaning. Changing the syntax can completely alter the message.
Grammaticality: Syntax helps us distinguish between grammatically
correct and incorrect sentences in a language.
Relationships: It reveals the grammatical relationships between words
(e.g., which noun is the subject of which verb).
Ambiguity: Syntactic analysis can help explain why some sentences have
multiple possible interpretations.
Illustrative Examples:
Introduction to Syntax (April 2025) edit. by Prof M. Elghazi
Sentence Structure: Consider the sentence "The student reads the book."
o This isn't a random collection of words. It follows a specific
pattern: [Subject: The student] [Predicate: reads the book].
o Compare it to "Reads the book the student" – this violates English
syntax and is ungrammatical.
Grammatical Rules:
o In English, adjectives typically precede nouns: "a tall man".
o In French, adjectives often follow nouns: "un homme grand" (a
man tall). Syntax describes these language-specific rules.
Ambiguity: The sentence "Visiting relatives can be annoying" is
syntactically ambiguous. It can mean:
o "Relatives who visit can be annoying." (Subject is "visiting
relatives" interpreted as a type of relative)
o "The act of visiting relatives can be annoying." (Subject is "visiting
relatives" interpreted as an activity)
Syntax helps us see the different structural possibilities that lead to
these meanings.
Syntactic categories, also known as word classes or parts of speech, are groups
of words that share similar grammatical properties and behaviors within
sentences. Identifying these categories is the first step in analyzing sentence
structure.
1. Lexical Categories: These are the "content" words (N, V, Adj, Adv).
They have relatively rich semantic meaning. This is an open class,
meaning new words are frequently added (e.g., selfie, google, tweet).
2. Functional Categories: These words serve primarily grammatical
functions and contribute to the structure of the sentence. This is a closed
class, meaning new words are rarely added. Examples include:
o Determiners (Det): Specify the reference of a noun (e.g., the, a,
this, those, my, some, many). Appear before nouns.
o Auxiliary Verbs (Aux): Help the main verb express tense, aspect,
modality, or voice (e.g., be, have, do, modal verbs like can, must,
will).
o Pronouns (Pron): Replace nouns or noun phrases (e.g., I, you, he,
she, it, we, they, him, her, them).
o Prepositions (P): Express relationships (location, direction, time,
etc.) between a noun phrase and another element in the sentence
(e.g., in, on, at, to, from, with, by).
o Conjunctions (Conj): Connect words, phrases, or clauses (e.g.,
and, but, or, because, although, while).
Introduction to Syntax (April 2025) edit. by Prof M. Elghazi
Note: Some classifications include Inflectional Categories separately, while
others view them as features associated with lexical or functional heads. For the
purpose of this introduction, we will discuss Inflectional Categories in a dedicated
section.
1. Define Syntax: In your own words, explain what syntax is and why it is
essential for understanding human language.
2. Categorize Words: Identify the most likely syntactic category (Noun,
Verb, Adjective, Adverb, Determiner, Preposition, Conjunction, Pronoun,
Auxiliary Verb) for the following words based on their typical use.
Explain your reasoning using the three criteria (semantic, morphological,
syntactic) where applicable:
3. Criteria Application: Choose one word from the list above and
demonstrate how you classify it based on the semantic, morphological (if
applicable), and syntactic criteria.
4. Open vs. Closed Classes: Explain the difference between lexical (open)
and functional (closed) categories. Provide at least two examples of each
type.
This chapter delves deeper into the specific properties and behaviors of the
primary lexical and functional categories introduced in the previous section.
Lexical categories are the main carriers of meaning in a sentence. Their properties
dictate how they can be used and combined.
Functional categories serve to link between the parts of a sentence. In other words,
they are the grammatical glue of sentences. They have less descriptive meaning
but are vital for grammatical structure. They are typically closed classes.
This Chapter introduces the functional roles that constituents play within the
sentence and begins to explore how words group together to form phrases, which
are the building blocks of larger structures.
6. Syntactic Functions
Subject: The element that typically controls verb agreement and is often
interpreted as the "doer" of an action, the entity in a state, or the topic of
predication.
o Traditional Semantic Views: Often defined as the "doer" (Agent)
or "topic." However, these semantic roles don't always align
perfectly with the grammatical subject.
Example: Mary slapped John. (Subject = Mary, Agent)
Example: John was bitten by a dog. (Subject = John,
Patient - not the doer)
Example: This book is interesting. (Subject = This book,
Topic)
o Grammatical Identification (in English): Subjects are best
identified by their grammatical properties:
Usually precedes the main verb in declarative sentences
(The cat slept).
Determines the form of the verb in the present tense 3rd
person singular (He runs, They run).
Is replaced by a subject pronoun (I, he, she, they) (John saw
Mary → He saw Mary).
Appears after the auxiliary verb in yes/no questions (Will
he go?).
Introduction to Syntax (April 2025) edit. by Prof M. Elghazi
Is referred to by the pronoun in a tag question (He is happy,
isn't he?).
o Grammatical vs. Logical Subject: In passive sentences (John was
bitten by a dog), "John" is the grammatical subject (satisfies the
grammatical tests), while "a dog" (in the by phrase) is the logical
subject (the semantic doer).
o Arabic Subject: In Standard Arabic, the subject ( الفاعلal-fāʿil)
typically follows the verb and is in the nominative case. In passive
sentences, the ناnāʾib al-fāʿil ( نائب الفاعل, "deputy of the doer")
takes the subject's position (after the verb) and nominative case,
but it corresponds to the logical object. Example: َب زيدٌ الرسال َة َ َكت
(kataba Zaydun ar-risālata, Zayd wrote the letter - Zayd is subject,
nominative). ت الرسال ُة
ِ َ( ُكتِبkutibati ar-risālatu, The letter was written
- The letter is nāʾib al-fāʿil, nominative).
o
Predicate: The part of the sentence that says something about the subject.
In a simple binary analysis, it includes the verb and everything that
follows it (objects, complements, modifiers). The core of the predicate is
the verb, sometimes called the predicator.
o Example: The cat slept soundly on the mat. (The bold part is the
predicate)
o Example: She gave him a book. (The bold part is the predicate)
o
Object: A noun phrase that typically follows the verb and is affected by
the action of the verb. Identified grammatically rather than solely
semantically ("receiver").
o Direct Object: The primary entity affected by a transitive verb.
Can often become the subject in a passive sentence.
Example: Mary slapped John. (John is the direct object)
Example: He ate an apple. (An apple is the direct object)
o Indirect Object: The recipient or beneficiary of the action,
typically appearing before the direct object or in a prepositional
phrase (usually with to or for).
Example: She gave him a book. (Him is the indirect object)
Example: She gave a book to him. (Him is the complement
of the preposition, fulfilling the role of indirect object)
o Grammatical Identification (in English):
Follows the verb in active sentences (ate an apple ).
Is replaced by an object pronoun (me, him, her) (saw Mary
→ saw her).
Becomes the subject in a passive sentence (The cat chased
the mouse → The mouse was chased by the cat).
Introduction to Syntax (April 2025) edit. by Prof M. Elghazi
Note: Not every NP after a verb is an object (e.g., He died
last week - "last week" is an adverbial phrase, not an
object).
Complements: Elements that complete the meaning of a head word (verb,
noun, adjective, preposition). They are often structurally required by the
head.
o Verb Complements: Direct objects, indirect objects, and
predicative complements (following linking verbs).
Example: She is happy. (Happy is a predicative adjective
complement of is)
Example: They elected him president. (President is an
object complement of elected, referring to the object him)
o Noun Complements: Phrases that complete the meaning of a
noun.
Example: the destruction of the city (of the city is a PP
complement of destruction)
o Adjective Complements: Phrases that complete the meaning of an
adjective.
Example: happy about the result (about the result is a PP
complement of happy)
o Preposition Complements: The noun phrase that follows the
preposition (in the house ).
Modifiers (Adjuncts): Elements that add extra, non-essential information
about another word or phrase (adding qualities, describing
how/when/where something happened). They are often optional.
o Adjectival Modifiers: Modify nouns (adjectives, adjective
phrases, some PPs).
Example: the tall man (tall modifies man)
Example: the man in the hat (in the hat modifies man)
o Adverbial Modifiers: Modify verbs, adjectives, adverbs, or
clauses (adverbs, adverb phrases, PPs, clauses).
Example: He walked quickly. (quickly modifies walked)
Example: He walked in the park. (in the park modifies
walked)
This Chapter explores how words combine to form hierarchical structures called
phrases and how linguists identify these functional units (constituents) within
sentences. We will introduce the fundamental mechanism for building these
Introduction to Syntax (April 2025) edit. by Prof M. Elghazi
structures (Merge) and a foundational theory for describing phrase structure (X-
bar Theory).
Why Merge?
Introduction to Syntax (April 2025) edit. by Prof M. Elghazi
Merge is seen as the simplest possible structure-building operation. Its recursive
nature explains a fundamental property of human language: the ability to generate
an infinite number of sentences from a finite set of words.
X-bar theory is a framework that provides a template or schema for how phrases
are structured across different syntactic categories (Noun, Verb, Adjective,
Preposition). It proposes that phrases are not flat sequences but have a layered,
hierarchical structure.
Example:
DP
|
D'
/ \
D NP
| |
a N'
/ \
N PP <--- Complement to Noun 'book'
| |
book P'
/ \
P NP <--- Complement to Preposition 'about'
| |
about syntax
Traditionally, a phrase like "the cat" was analyzed as a Noun Phrase (NP) headed
by the noun "cat," with "the" as a specifier or modifier within that NP. The DP
Hypothesis, proposed by Abney (1987) and widely adopted in generative syntax,
argues that the determiner (D) is actually the head of the phrase, and the
traditional NP is its complement. The full phrase is therefore a Determiner
Phrase (DP).
Several arguments suggest that determiners behave more like heads than nouns in
controlling the phrase's properties:
Conclusion on DP Hypothesis:
1. Traditional vs. DP: Briefly explain the core difference between the
traditional analysis of nominal phrases (NP-headed by N) and the DP
Hypothesis (DP-headed by D).
2. Evidence for DP: Provide one piece of evidence (from the lecture) that
supports the DP Hypothesis over the traditional NP analysis. Explain how
it supports the DP analysis.
3. Pronouns as DPs: How does the behavior of pronouns (like he or they)
support the idea that nominal phrases are DPs rather than NPs?
4. Draw DP Tree: Draw a simple tree diagram for the phrase "my friend"
following the DP Hypothesis. Label the nodes (Det, N, DP, N').
Conclusion