Electrochemistry - 2025 - Answer To Ncert - Hot - Etc
Electrochemistry - 2025 - Answer To Ncert - Hot - Etc
0· 0591 [ Sn 2 + ] 0· 0591 0· 05
Nernst equation : Ecell = Eºcell – log + 2
= [0 – (– 0·14)– log
2 [H ] 2 (0· 02)2
0· 0591 0· 0591
= 0·14 – log 125 = 0·14 – (2·0969) = 0·078 V
2 2
(iv) Cell reaction : 2 Br– + 2H+ → Br2 + H2 (Note carefully)
0· 0591 1
Nernst equation : Ecell = Eºcell – log
2 [ Br ] [H + ]2
− 2
0· 0591 1 0· 0591
∴ Ecell = (0 – 1·08) – log =– 1·08 – log (1·111 × 107)
2 [0· 01]2 [0· 03]2 2
0· 0591
(7·0457) = 1·08 – 0·208 = – 1·288 V
= – 1·08 –
2
Thus, oxidation will occur at the hydrogen electrode and reduction on the Br2 electrode. Ecell = 1·288 V
6. The cell reaction occurring in the cell are :
− −
Zn → Zn2+ + 2e (oxidation), 2Ag+(aq) + 2e → 2 Ag(s) (reduction)
E ocell = E ocathode − E oanode = E Ag
o
+
/Ag
− E oZn 2+ /Zn = 0·80 − (− 0·76) = 1·56 V
o
∆rGº = − nF E cell = − 2 × 96500 × 1·56 = – 301080 CV = – 301080 J = – 301·08kJ.
7. See Notes – Page No.1 to 3
8. See Notes – Page No.2
9. See Notes – Page No.2
1 S cm −1
10. = 1 (unit conversion factor)
100 S m −1
Conc. (M) c1/2 (M1/2) κ(S m–1) κ (S cm–1) 1000 × κ
Λ cm = (S cm2 mol–1)
Molarity
10–3 0·03146 1·237 × 10–2 1·237 × 10–4 1000 × 1· 237 × 10 −4
= 123·7
10 − 3
10–2 0·100 11·85 × 10–2 11·85 × 10–4 1000 × 11· 85 × 10 −4
= 118·5
10 − 2
2 × 10–2 0·141 23·15 × 10–2 23·15 × 10–4 1000 × 23· 15 × 10 −4
= 115·8
2 × 10 − 2
5 × 10–2 0·224 55·53 × 10–2 55·53 × 10–4 1000 × 55· 53 × 10 −4
= 111·1
5 × 10 − 2
10–1 0·316 106·74 × 10–2 106·74 × 10–4 1000 × 106· 74 × 10 −4
= 106·7
10 −1
PROF. RAVINDER CHADHA : 9814102167
351, Adarsh Nagar, Jalandhar City
(XII) : Electrochemistry (30)
Λºm can be obtained on extrapolation to zero concentration along Y axis. It is 124·0 S cm2 mol–1.
11. Specific conductance or conductivity, κ = 7·896 × 10–5 S cm-1 , c = 0·00241 M, Λcm = ?
Since Fe3+ undergo reduction and I- undergo oxidation, 2I- + 2Fe3+ → I2 + 2Fe2+
E ocell = E oc - E oa = E Fe
º
3+
/Fe
º
– EI – = 0·77 – 0·54 = + 0·23 V
2 /2I
The EMF of the reaction in positive, thus the reaction between Fe3+ and I– is feasible
(ii) Cu(s) + Ag+(aq) → Cu2+ (aq) + Ag(s) ; E ocell = E Ago
+
/Ag
- E oCu 2+ /Cu = 0·80 – 0·34 = + 0·46 V
The reaction is also feasible because the EMF of the reaction is positive
PROF. RAVINDER CHADHA 351, Adarsh Nagar, Jalandhar City : 9814102167
(XII) : Electrochemistry (31)
(iii) Br–(aq) + Fe3+(aq) → Fe2+(aq) + ½Br2(g); Eºcell = 0·77 – (1·09) = – 0·32 V (not feasible)
(iv) Ag(s) + Fe3+(aq) → Ag+ (aq) + Fe2+ (aq); Eocell = EFe
o
3+
/Fe 2+
− EAg
o
+
/Ag
= 0·77 – 0·80 = – 0·03 V
The reaction is not feasible because the EMF of the reaction comes to be -ve
(v) Fe2+(aq) + ½Br2(aq) → Fe3+(aq) + Br–(aq); Eºcell = 1·09 – 0·77 = 0·32 V (feasible)
18 (i) An aqueous solution of AgNO3 using silver electrodes :
Both AgNO3 and water will ionize in aqueous solution
(aq) − (aq)
AgNO3(aq) → Ag+(aq) + NO 3 (aq) ; H2O H+(aq) + OH– (aq)
At cathode: Ag+ ions have greater preference for discharging than H+ ions, so Ag will be deposited at cathode.
Ag+ + e– → Ag
At anode: Silver from anode will dissolve to form Ag+ ions which go in the solution. Ag(s) → Ag+(aq) + e–
(aq) (aq)
CuCℓ2 2Cu2+ + 2Cℓ– ; H2O H+ + OH–
At anode : Cℓ– ions will be discharged in preference to OH– ions, so, Cℓ2 will be evolved at anode.
2Cℓ–(aq) → Cℓ2(g) + 2e–
At cathode : Cu2+ ions will be reduced in preference of H+ ions, so, Cu will be deposited at cathode.
Cu2+(aq) + 2e– → Cu(s)
( 96500 C )
7. Quantity of electricity flowing through the cross section of the wire per second = 1A × 1 sec = 1 Coulomb
1 Faraday (96,500 C) is equivalent to flow of 1 mole of electrons, i.e., 6·022 × 1023 electrons.
6· 022 × 10 23
∴ 1 C will be equivalent to flow of electrons = = 6·24 × 1018
96500
Alternatively:
Quantity of electricity flowing through the cross section of the wire per second = 1A × 1 sec = 1 Coulomb
Charge flowing (Q) = no. of electrons flowing (n) × Charge on one electron (e)
∴ n= Q = 1 = 6·24 × 1018
−19
e 1· 602 × 10
−
8. The electrode reaction written as reduction reaction is Zn2+(aq) + 2e l Zn(s); (n = 2)
95
As 0·1 M ZnSO4 solution is 95% dissociated, this means that in the solution, [Zn2+] = × 0·1 M = 0·095 M
100
Applying Nernst Equation, we get E Zn 2+ /Zn = E oZn 2+ /Zn − 0·0591 log 1
2 [Zn 2+ ]
∴ E Zn 2+ /Zn = − 0·76 − 0·0591 log 1 = − 0·7902 volts
2 0·095
1
9 (i) H2O → 2H+ + O2 + 2e–
2
1 mol 2 mol
2F
Charge required for the oxidation of 1 mole of H2O = 2F
∴ “ “ “ “ “ “ 2 mole of H2O = 4F = 4 × 96500 C
(ii) Molarity = No. of moles
Volume in litres
∴ No. of moles = M × V = 0·5 mol L–1 × 0·5 L = 0·25 mol
MnO4– + 8H+ + 5e– → Mn2+ + 4H2O
1mole 5mol
5F
For the reduction of 1 mole of MnO4–, charge required = 5F = 5 × 96500 C
“ “ “ “ 0·25 mole “ “ “ “ = 5 × 96500 × 0·25 = 120625 C
+ −
10. Electrode reaction involved is as: H (aq) + e → ½ H2(g)
Applying Nernst equation at 298 K
0· 0591 p H2
E 2 H + / H = E o2 H + / H − log (Here n = 1, pH2 = 1 atm)
2 2 n [H + ]
0· 0591 1
− 0·118 V = 0 V − pH (Q pH = log )
1 [H + ]
0· 118
or 0·0591 pH = 0·118 V or pH = = 1·9966 ≈ 2
0· 0591
E2 H + / H − 0· 118
Alternatively E 2 H + / H = – 0·0591 pH, ∴ pH = 2
= ≈2
2 − 0· 0591 − 0· 0591
11. I = 2·5A, t = 35 min = 35 × 60s
E × I.t W × 96500 3· 06 × 96500
W = Z.I.t. = or E= = = 56·25g
96500 I.t 2· 5 × 35 × 60
(Where E is equivalent mass and Z is electrochemical equivalent)
Λc 39· 05
∴ α = m = = 0·1
Λmo
390· 5
13. Step I Calculation of the quantity of charge passed.
We know that Power = Voltage × Current
100 W 100
∴ 100 W = 110 V × I or I= = amp
110 V 110
Now, charge passed (Q) = current × time =
100
amp × (4 × 60 × 60s) = 13091 C
110
Step II Calculation of mass of cadmium deposited. The cathodic reaction is
Cd2+(aq) + 2e– → Cd(s)
2F 1 mol = 112·2 g
2 × 96500 C
2 × 96500 C of charge deposit Cd = 122·2 g
PROF. RAVINDER CHADHA : 9814102167
351, Adarsh Nagar, Jalandhar City
(XII) : Electrochemistry (33)
(112· 2g )
∴ 13091 C of charge deposit Cd = × (13091C) = 7·61 g.
( 2 × 96500 C )
0·0591 1
14. Ecell = E ocell – log 2+
o
= E cell + 0·0295 log C
2 [Zn ]
When solution is diluted 100 times
C
E 'cell = E ocell + 0·0295 log o
= E cell + 0·0295 log C + 0·0295 (– 2)
100
∴ Ecell will decrease by 0·0295 × 2 = 0·059 V
15. Λ º
m ( NH 4C l ) = Λ ºm( NH + ) + Λ mº (Cl− ) = (73·8 + 76·2) = 150·0 S cm2 mol–1; κ = 1·29 × 10–2 S cm–1
4
☺☺☺☺☺
PROF. RAVINDER CHADHA : 9814102167
351, Adarsh Nagar, Jalandhar City
(XII) : Electrochemistry (34)
Sol. to N.3 at Page No.4
According to Kohlrausch law ∧CH
o
3COOH
= ∧ oCH3COONa + ∧ HC
o
l − ∧ NaCl
o