group Assignment Research
group Assignment Research
Bedele, Ethiopia
June, 2022
Topic of the Article Reviewed: Alternative Reward Strategies and
Employee Reactions
DOI: 10.1177/0886368703261273
Compensation & Benefits Review 2004 36: 41
Larry W. Howard and Thomas W. Dougherty
Introduction
The main objective the article review is to emphasize the alternative reward strategy and
employee reaction usefulness in the organization.
Reward systems can provide an organization a competitive advantage. Indeed, it has been argued
that pay systems are, in fact, only as good as the impact they have on firm performance. Pay
systems are strategically designed when rewards are linked to activities, attributes and work
outcomes that support the organization’s strategic direction and that foster the achievement of
strategic goals. Strategic compensation theory proposes that such linkages can lead to increased
employee knowledge or skill development, flexibility, commitment, retention and productivity.
Purpose
The overall purpose of this study is to emphasize the Alternative Reward Strategies and
Employee Reactions usefulness for the organization effectiveness as well as to Pay systems are
strategically designed when rewards are linked to activities, attributes and work out comes that
support the organization’s strategic direction and that foster the achievement of strategic Goals.
Statement of the problem. This article describesThe fact of strategic compensation
theory is untested theory-in-use. In addition strategic planners often identify
multiple, sometimes incongruous or even competing goals. Pay systems
must be complex because, although they provide some opportunities for
leveraging motivation toward strategic actions, they must also meet goals
that are not directly related to competitive strategies . Perceived unfairness
arouses dysfunctional emotions, including anger, depression and anxiety
that can contribute to downstream undesirable responses, including theft,
absenteeism and alcohol use. Furthermore, pay fairness bears implications
for managing conflict and litigation. This article review try to identify some
possible reward strategy that effect organizational goals or out comes.
Discussion and recommendation part
It also summarizes some of the principal arguments of strategic compensation theory that argues
market reward strategy will help to reduce the turn over because paying at or above the market
rate can switch the employees cost and introduces several counterpart arguments regarding pay
strategies and potentially confounding effects on employee satisfaction and perceptions of
fairness
The discussion part of the journal was not supported by available literature review, this make the
discussion detached from the reference
The researcher identified the recommendation point for the effectiveness of the organizational
goals, commitment, and intention to remain current employer.
Study Sample and Method of data analysis
Managers and employees rated the extent to which rewards in their organizations depended
upon the five alternative reward criteria. Employees also indicated their levels of pay
satisfaction, pay fairness, work effort, organizational commitment and intentions to remain with
the organization.
And also the researcher was used regression method of data analysis that best fit with his data
Strength
The measures they have used to capture perceived reward strategies were new.
Their analyses met generally accepted criteria for statistical significance.
I believe they have identified some of the key issues to consider regarding strategic pay.
As much as possible the researcher identified different advices which are beneficiary for
organizational goal effectiveness and efficiency.
Limitations
The sample was small, and all came from one Midwestern state in the United States
The other limitations to what they may conclude, the evidence points to some tentative
guidelines for implementing strategic pay
only used questionnaire for data collecting purpose and the findings were not clear
Group opinion
Pay systems are strategically designed when rewards are linked to activities, attributes and work
outcomes that support the organization’s strategic direction and that foster the achievement of
strategic goals.
Although, the article is well written, clear and has relevant information, not supported by some
research criterion. Such as literature review, statement of the problem, significance of the study,
and also used only questionnaire method for data collection purpose.
Purpose of Study
Small firms know little about financial management and decision making and
also lack of planning and development. So the article trying to high lights the
role of management toward the financial performance of small firms. The
research differs from the previous researches in the sense that previous
researches were done on the strong economies.
Objective of the study: the article clearly describes the general objective
of the study (the role of management toward the financial performance of
small firms of the study or the research)
The general objective of the study was clearly identified but the specific
objective and the question were not clearly stated in the journal.
Statement of the problem: The study was conducted in backward areas of
Punjab. The small firms of south Punjab were growing day by day and have a
meaningful impact on growth of the economy, but the basic culture of these
firms is not so well developed. The owners or employees of the firms were
not well educated, so the researcher face a lot of problems in collecting data
from them. Mostly they were not fully aware of the formal terminologies of
management, the researcher tried his level best to clear the terms and to
get the pure data.
The literature review support the statement of the problem as the research
idea was new and not repeated
Weakness
The specific objective of the study was not clearly identified
The researcher was not identified the limitation of the study
The researcher does not use the topic into the sub-topic
Similarity between both researchers identified the gap of previous literatures this made them the
same (similar)
Both researchers uses small sample size which is selected from small sample units
The qualitative research journal clearly state the statement of the problem, abstract, objective,
question of the research and conceptual frame work and other bodies the report.
The discussion of the report was clearly identified in tabular and graphic form but this is stated in
other researchers report.
The 1st researcher uses quantitative data collection method which is questionaries’ ’interview and
(closed ended)
The second researcher uses qualitative data collection method which is open ended
questionnaires’’.
The 3rd journal uses both qualitative and qualitative from data collection
The mixed researcher uses SPSS data analysis form while the quantitative one uses descriptive
way of data analysis.
The 1st journal (qualitative one) cannot discuss the research finding using theory in literature
review.
In general both the researches have some similarities and differences but both of them were the
researches based on new problem or identified research gaps.