IMPACTOFREGULARANDIRREGULARREINFORCEDCONCRETESTRUCTUREUNDERSEISMICCONDITIONS
IMPACTOFREGULARANDIRREGULARREINFORCEDCONCRETESTRUCTUREUNDERSEISMICCONDITIONS
net/publication/357203832
CITATIONS READS
0 289
2 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Md. Ali Akbar on 21 December 2021.
Md. Akramul Haque1, Presented a paper on comparison and analysis of regular and
Md. Ali Akbar 2 irregular configuration of multistory building in various
1
Feni University, Student of Civil Engineering, Feni-3900, seismic zones and various types of soil. The main aim of
Bangladesh this paper is to grasp the physical behavior of the structure
in seismic zone and also to evaluate storey drift, storey
2
Feni University, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Feni-3900, displacement, overturning moment. In this paper 15storey
Bangladesh building on four fully different shape models like
rectangular, C-shapes model, L-shapes model, H-shape
Abstract—The building configuration is too much necessary model are used as a comparison. The all models were
for good seismic performance. Now a day, it is need to analyzed with the assistance of STAAD pro V8i version.
seismic analysis of building structure, because most of the The result indicates that, the overturning moment varies
structures were affected due to lateral load and many inversely with developed height of the storey. The store drift
respected life, wealth and economic properties are damaged. is low in rectangular shape than the irregular shapes.[3,4]
In this paper it is addressed a comparative study of the The purpose of the paper to evaluate the performance and
regular and irregular structures with plan irregularity located behavior of six regular and irregular G+15 storey RC
on specific zone. The main purpose of this paper is to study structure having same area and to analysis all models G+15
the structural behavior of multistory Reinforcement concrete RC structure as per BNBC:2015, using CSI ETABS 2015
structure for different plan configuration such as rectangular software.[5], to compare the responses like storey drift,
shape as regular along with L-shape, C-shape, T-shape, H- overturning moment, fundamental periods and frequency
shape, Z-shape in accordance with the seismic provisions. In between the regular and irregular RC structure.
this study 16 stories building are analyzed by using ETABS- II. METHODOLOGY
2015 and BNBC Code 2015. There are six several models
are analyzed to find out the stability due to seismic load. The collected data from primary source and information
Among theses, one is regular shape and remaining is taken from secondary source were used for comparison.
Irregular, all models are different shape but having same Primary data are collected from software analysis (ETABS-
area. All outcomes as different seismic responses such 2015). In the current research, dynamic Time-History
fundamental periods with frequency and storey drift are analysis was carried out. Time-History analysis techniques
compared among the all modes involve the stepwise solution in the time domain of the multi
Keywords— fundamental periods, frequency, storey drift, degree of freedom equations of motion which represent the
irregular shape, irregularity shape, concrete structure response of a building as actual. To determine the dynamic
responses by Time-history method, one must solve the
I. INTRODUCTION (HEADING 1) equation of motion. The equation is therefore-
In real field, the structure are being widely design as [M]{D}+[C]{D}+[K]{D}={F} (1)
architectural purpose as irregular structures. We can say a
structure is a regular when the structural configurations are M is the mass matrix, C is the damping matrix and k is the
almost symmetrical about the axis and due to lacks of stiffness matrix. ETABS-2015 was used (commercial Finite
symmetry and discontinuity of structural configurations (i.e. element based software) to conduct the Time-History
geometry, mass, re-entrant corner, stiffness or load resisting analysis.
elements) it is defined as irregular structure. Structural Secondarily, Data were collected from journal, Books and
irregularities are greatly vulnerable under seismic condition. publication, Research and project report. Both quantitative
So, we need to analysis of structure with irregular and rich in good techniques in data collection and
configurations, to design a gratification level of concern as exploration were utilize as main instrument.
safety and reduce seismic vulnerability. Models of the structures
Mainly irregularities can be classified are two types:
Horizontal irregularities: refers to asymmetrical plan shapes
or discontinuities in horizontal resisting elements such as re-
entrant corner, large openings, cut outs and other change
like deformations and stress concentrations.
Vertical irregularities: refers to sudden change strength,
stiffness, vertical geometry and mass of a structural in
vertical direction [1].
To evaluate, studied the behavior of regular and irregular
G+10 storey concrete building under seismic load. They Model 1(Rectangle) Model 2( L-Shape)
consider different types of configuration. The analysis was
done by response spectrum analysis method. [2, 7]
2
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Model 5(H-Shape) Model 6( Z
Z-Shape)
Number of stories 16
Grade beam
GB-1 12 in x 18
Beam size in
Fig2: Methodology of study
GB-2 12 in x 20
in
Roof beam
RB-1 12 in x 18
in
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
RB-2 12 in x 20
in Here, in this study results has been obtained for individual
C-1 14in x 20 models by drawing graphs with the given literaure presented
Column size in in prevoius this paper. Given results shows the variation for
C-2 16 in x 20 periods and frequencies, maximum store
storey drift, is presented.
in A. Authors and Affiliations
C-3 20 in x 30 The figure shows G+15th storied building whice have
in
different models with different shape and the figure also
Grade of concrete ( column 4000 psi shows Periods of those building. The variation of
and beam) ,fc’ fundamental periods of six modelss have found, from the
Grade of concrete ( Slab) 3000 psi analysis. Overall it can be seen that comperative time
,fc’ duratin of reguler and irreguler structure due to specific
Grade of steel ,fy 60000 psi zone perameters. The figure shows that unifromly variation
Thickness of Slab 5 in of periods due to increasing number of modes. If the
reseachar
ar want to describe them mode by mode then it
Live load 60 psf shown that becouse of the lateral load the Periods are varry
Seismic Zone II ( z=0.20) from mode to mode.
Fristly, the researchar analyze the Periods of model-1.
model Here
Importance Factor 1 in the frist mode the Period 2.152 sec and in the second
mode the Period is 1.962 sec.. The Period of the 3rd mode is
Response reduction factor 8
1.927 cycles per sec, 0.704 sec is the Period of the 4th mode
Soil type II of model-1. 1. The reseachar also found the Period of the
model-11 from five to tweleve modes those are 0.243
sec0.253 sec0.28 sec0.361 sec0.368 sec0.406 sec0.633 2.5
sec0.636 sec
periods in second
2
2.5
periods in second 1.5
2 1
1.5 0.5
1 0
0.5 0 5 10 15
Number of modes
0
Fig6: variation of periods of model-4
0 5
Number 10
of modes 15
In the model-4, here the Period of the first mode is 2.106 sec
Fig 3: Variation of periods of model-1 and in the second mode the Period is 1.798 sec. The Period
of the 3rd mode is 1.692 sec, 0.661cycle is the Period of the
4th mode of model-4. The reseachar also found the Period of
2 the model-4 from five to tweleve modes those 0.203 sec
0.584 sec 0.236 sec 0.304 sec 0.328 sec 0.352 sec 0.547 sec
periods in second
cycle per sec and in the second mode the Periods is 1.565 1.5
sec. The Periods of the 3rd mode is 1.503 sec;0.546 secis the
Periods of the 4th mode of model-2. The reseachar also 1
found the Periods of the model-2 from five to sixteen modes
those are 0.189 sec 0.205 sec 0.218 sec0.279 sec 0.297 0.5
sec0.314 cycle per sec 0.513 sec 0.489 sec respectively.
In the model-3, here the Period of the first mode is 2.139 sec 0
and in the second mode the Period is 1.897 sec. The Period 0 5 10 15
of the 3rd mode is 1.862 sec, 0.694 sec is the Period of the Number of modes
4th mode of model-3. The reseachar also found the Period of
the model-3 from five to tweleve modes those 0.28 sec
0.345 sec 0.348 sec 0.36 sec 0.392 c sec 0.394 sec 0.622 sec Fig7: variation of periods of model-5
0.606 sec respectively.
2.5
2 2
periods in second
periods in second
1.5 1.5
1 1
0.5 0.5
0 0
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
Number of modes Number of modes
2.5 5
Modes vs Periods of allmodel 4
model 3
1.5 02 2
model
1
03 1
model
0.5 0
04
0 5 numbers
mode 10 15
0
0 5 10 15 Fig 10: Frequencies
uencies of vibrations of model-1
model
Number of modes
seconds
2 2
1.5
1 1
0.5 0
0
0 5 10 15
0 5 10 15
mode numbers
mode numbers
Fig 14: Frequencies of vibrations of model-5
Fig12: Frequencies of vibrations of model-3
5
6 4
seconds
4
2
3
1
2
0
1
0 5 10 15
0
mode numbers
0 5 10 15
mode numbers Fig 15: Frequencies of vibrations of model-6
drift
4.994E-07, 4.54E-07, 4.356E-07, 4.265E-07, 4.209E-07,
1.00E-04
4.171E-07, 4.144E-07, 4.124E-07 respectively.
5.00E-05
0.00E+00
1.60E-04
1.40E-04 0 10 20
storey numbers
1.20E-04
1.00E-04
Fig 19: storey drift of model -3
drift
8.00E-05
6.00E-05
4.00E-05 3.50E-04
2.00E-05 3.00E-04
0.00E+00 2.50E-04
0 10 20 2.00E-04
drift
storey numbers
1.50E-04
1.00E-04
Fig 17: Storey drifts of model 1 5.00E-05
0.00E+00
0 5 10 15 20
1.20E-04 storey numbers
6.00E-05 In the model-4, Here the drift of the first storied is 0.000304
and in the second storied the drift is 0.000163. The drift of
4.00E-05 the 3rd storied is 5.5E-05,1.5E-05 is the drift of the 4th
storied of model-1. The reseachar also found the drift of the
2.00E-05
model-1 from five to sixteen storieds those are 4E-06, 1E-
0.00E+00 06, 1.242E-07, 2.877E-07, 4.673E-07, 1E-06, 1E-06, 1E-06,
1E-06, 1E-06, 2E-06, 9E-06respectively.
0 5 10 15 20
In the model-5, Here the drift of the first storied is 9.9E-05
storey numbers
and in the second storied the drift is 0.000151. The drift of
the 3rd storied is 4.9E-05,1.3E-05 is the drift of the 4th
storied of model-1. The reseachar also found the drift of the
Fig 18: Storey drift of model 2
model-1 from five to sixteen storieds those are 4E-06, 2E-
After describing the model-1 the researcher turn his focus 06, 2E-06, 1E-06, 1E-06, 1E-06, 1E-06, 1E-06, 1E-06, 1E-
on the model-2. Here the drift of the first storied is 8.1E-05 06, 1E-06, 1E-06respectively.
and in the second storied the drift is 0.0001. The drift of the
3rd storied is 4E-05,1.1E-05 is the drift of the 4th storied of
model-1. The reseachar also found the drift of the model-1
1.60E-04
from five to sixteen storieds those are 4E-06, 3E-06, 2E-06,
2E-06, 3E-06, 3E-0,6 3E-0, 6 3E-06, 3E-06, 7E-06, 7E-06, 1.40E-04
4E-06 respectively. 1.20E-04
In the model-3, Here the drift of the first storied is 1.00E-04
drift
4.00E-04
3.50E-04 2.50E-04
3.00E-04
2.50E-04 2.00E-04
drift
2.00E-04 1.50E-04
1.50E-04
1.00E-04
1.00E-04
5.00E-05 5.00E-05
0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0 5 10 15 20
0 10 20
storey numbers
5.00E-04
4.00E-04 1.3E-05, 1.5E-05, 6.1E-05
05 respectively
3.00E-04
2.00E-04
1.00E-04
0.00E+00 1.00E-03
0 10 20 8.00E-04 model-1
model-2
6.00E-04
dift
Fig 27: storey drift of model -4 model-3
4.00E-04
model-4
In the model-4, 4, Here the drift of the first storied is 0.000898
2.00E-04 model-5
and in the second storied the drift is0.00048.. The drift of the
3rd storied is 8.7E-05, 1.5E-05 is the drift of the 4th storied of model-6
0.00E+00
model-1.1. The reseachar also found the drift of the model model-1
from five to sixteen storieds those are 3E-06, 06, 2E
2E-06, 2E-06, 0 5 10 15 20
2E-06, 2E-06, 1E-06, 1E-06, 1.5E-05, 1E-06, 06, 2E-06,
2E 3E-06,
1E-06 respectively. Fig 30: storey drift of all models
In the model-5, 5, Here the drift of the first storied is 0.000133
and in the second storied the drift is 0.000146.
0.000146 The drift of After descriving all the models the reseachar examine that
the 3rd storied is 3.5E-05,3E-06 is the drift of the 4th storied the drift is so heigh in storieds one and two. The researchar
of model-1.1. The reseachar also found the drift of the model
model- also avaluet that the drift of the model
model-4 is high and model-
1 from five to sixteen storieds those are 2E-06, 06, 3E
3E-06, 3E- 1 is in good position becouse of it’s regular shape thethen all
06, 3E-06, 2E-06, 2E-06, 2E-06, 2E-06, 2E-06, 06, 2E
2E-06, 2E- other models of this figure.
06, 2E-06 respectively.
E. Overall Findings
1.80E-04 The following findings have been obtained from the Study:
Study:-
1.60E-04 The periods of vibration is maximum for the model
1.40E-04 01 (Rectangular Shape) and minimum for the
1.20E-04 model 02 (L – Shape)
1.00E-04 Frequency is maximum for the model 02 (L- (L
drift
F. Conclusions
4.50E-04 The purpose of study was to analyze plan irregularities
irregularitie of
4.00E-04 high-rise
rise building structures and to observe the behavior of
3.50E-04 its. For this, ETABS a linear dynamic analysis and design
3.00E-04 program for three dimensional structures has been used.
2.50E-04
drift
higher for irregular shape than the regular structures. [3] Pritam C.pawade, Dr.p.p.Saklecha, Milind R.Nikhar “Comparison
and Analysis of Regular and Irregular Configuration of Multistory
Maximum storey drift is decreases with increases in number Building in Various Seismic Zones and Various Types of Soil”
of storey. Storey drift has maximum values in irregular International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and
shape building as compared to regular buildings. From the Technology.Vol. 5,pp 81-87 , June 2018.
present study it is concluded that the building with irregular [4] M.Seetha. K.E. Viswanathan“Comparison of multistory Building with
structural configuration are subjected to severe damage Regular and Irregular Shape in Different Seismic Zones” International
Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science
when compared to the regular structure (IJRIAS),Vol. 3,pp 1-7 , June 2018.
[5] ETABS (2015). Integrated Building Design Software. ISO
ETA122815M1 Rev 2016.
[6] T.Jayakrishna, K.Murali, Powar Saish, J Seetunya “ Seismic Analysis
REFERENCES of Regular and Irregular Multi-Storey Buildings by using Staad-pro”
[1] Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC-2015), Housing and International Journal of Civil Engineering and Tecnology (IJCIET),
Building Research Institute. Volume-2 Vol.9, PP 431-439, January 2018.
[2] Oman Sayyed, Suresh Singh Kushwah, Aruna Rawat “Seismic [7] Md.Shafiul Ajam, Rajib Panday and Md. Naimul Haque “Influence of
Analysis of Vertical Irregular RC Building With Stiffness and Vertically Irregular Configurations of Building on Seismic
Setback Irregularities” IOSR Journal of mechanical and Civil Responses” International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and
Engineering (IOSR-JMCE),Vol.14, pp 40-45, Jan. – Feb.2017 Renewable Energy (ICMERE2017), 18-20 December, 2017,
Chittagong, Bangladesh.