9699_w24_ms_22
9699_w24_ms_22
com
Cambridge International AS & A Level – Mark Scheme
October/November
PUBLISHED 2024
SOCIOLOGY 9699/22
Paper 2 The Family October/November 2024
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2024 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level components, and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level
descriptions for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
a DO credit answers which are worded differently from the mark scheme if they clearly
convey the same meaning (unless the mark scheme requires a specific term)
b DO credit alternative answers/examples which are not written in the mark scheme if they
are correct
c DO credit answers where candidates give more than one correct answer in one
prompt/numbered/scaffolded space where extended writing is required rather than list-type
answers. For example, questions that require n reasons (e.g. State two reasons …).
d DO NOT credit answers simply for using a ‘key term’ unless that is all that is required.
(Check for evidence it is understood and not used wrongly.)
e DO NOT credit answers which are obviously self-contradicting or trying to cover all
possibilities
f DO NOT give further credit for what is effectively repetition of a correct point already
credited unless the language itself is being tested. This applies equally to ‘mirror
statements’ (i.e. polluted/not polluted).
g DO NOT require spellings to be correct, unless this is part of the test. However spellings of
syllabus terms must allow for clear and unambiguous separation from other syllabus terms
with which they may be confused (e.g. Corrasion/Corrosion)
3 Calculation questions:
• The mark scheme will show the steps in the most likely correct method(s), the mark for
each step, the correct answer(s) and the mark for each answer
• If working/explanation is considered essential for full credit, this will be indicated in the
question paper and in the mark scheme. In all other instances, the correct answer to a
calculation should be given full credit, even if no supporting working is shown.
• Where the candidate uses a valid method which is not covered by the mark scheme,
award equivalent marks for reaching equivalent stages.
• Where an answer makes use of a candidate’s own incorrect figure from previous working,
the ‘own figure rule’ applies: full marks will be given if a correct and complete method is
used. Further guidance will be included in the mark scheme where necessary and any
exceptions to this general principle will be noted.
4 Annotation:
• For point marking, ticks can be used to indicate correct answers and crosses can be used
to indicate wrong answers. There is no direct relationship between ticks and marks. Ticks
have no defined meaning for levels of response marking.
• For levels of response marking, the level awarded should be annotated on the script.
• Other annotations will be used by examiners as agreed during standardisation, and the
meaning will be understood by all examiners who marked that paper.
Some of the questions are marked using a point-based system, awarding marks for specific points
and accumulating a total mark by adding points.
Some of the questions are marked using level of response. For these, the level description represents
performance at the top of the level.
For Question 4 and Question 5, award a mark for each assessment objective separately, using the
level descriptions mark scheme.
In some cases, candidates may provide a response which the mark scheme has not predicted. These
answers should nevertheless be credited according to their quality.
Annotation Meaning
Identification of a point.
E1
Explanation of the point
Developed point
Evaluation point
Juxtaposition of point
Benefit of the doubt given / the point is just about worthy of credit
Repetition
Too vague
Incorrect response
Irrelevant material
Indicative content
1 mark for describing how this way shows how gender can influence
the experience of childhood.
(2 2 marks)
Indicative content
1 mark for explaining how the material supports the point (e.g. grow
up to become passive workers, consumers & citizens unaware of
their position of oppression & exploitation).
(2 4 marks)
2(b) Explain one strength and one limitation of Marxist views of the 6
family.
Indicative content
Strengths:
• Provides a historical view on the development of the family.
• Recognises the exploitation that takes place in the family.
• Brings attention to the relationship the family has with the
economy.
• Identifies the ideological role the family performs.
• Highlights the inequalities of power that take place within the
family.
• Any other appropriate strength.
1 mark for explaining why the theory has this strength (e.g. because it
focuses on the shifting nature of the economy from feudalism to
capitalism and its effects on the family).
Limitations:
• Outdated/less relevant in today’s diverse societies.
• Economically deterministic – fails to consider other factors that
influence the family e.g. patriarchy, consensus of norms &
values.
• Traditional Marxism does not consider the exploitation &
oppression women face in the family.
• Does not recognise the increased independence women have
gained – have greater power and equality in the family.
• Fails to consider the many benefits the family provides its
members e.g. emotional support / exaggerates the negatives of
family life.
• Assumes its members are empty vessels who passively accept
capitalist ideology / fails to take into account free will in families
actively rejecting capitalism.
• Assumes family members are not conscious of the exploitation
and oppression they experience.
• Fails to recognise there are women that actively choose to
undertake the domestic role and even gain satisfaction from it –
they are not unconsciously oppressed & exploited by capitalism &
patriarchy.
• Any other appropriate limitation.
1 mark for explaining why the theory has this limitation (e.g. focuses
its analysis on the traditional nuclear family).
(2 3 marks)
Indicative content
Levels of response
Level 0: 0 marks
• No response worthy of credit.
Indicative content
• Greater gender equality as grandparents performing childcare
enables both parents to be in paid employment.
• Grandparents involved in childcare report it as having a positive
impact on their own lives.
• Growth in extended families means grandparents / great
grandparents act as a historical / cultural bridge to the past,
benefitting children with their wisdom & knowledge.
• Elderly relatives may be able to provide financial support, e.g.
grandparents paying for clothing, school fees etc.
• Greater opportunities for enhanced socialisation of grandchildren.
• Older people physically able for longer – can provide more active
leisure opportunities for children whilst both parents work
• Elderly family members can stay in paid work for longer,
increasing their sense of worth and reducing loneliness.
• Time to start again if in an empty shell marriage.
• Some elderly relatives may be able to afford institutional care and
therefore do not rely on family members for everyday care.
• Any other relevant argument.
Levels of response
4 Evaluate the view that the nuclear family is still important in society today. 26
4
In support of the view Against the view
The above content is indicative and other relevant approaches to the question
should be rewarded appropriately.
Examiners should award up to 8 marks for AO1, up to 8 marks for AO2, and up to 10 marks for AO3.
4 • Good knowledge and understanding of the view that the nuclear family is 7–8
still important in society today.
• The response contains a range of detailed points with good use of
concepts and theory/research evidence.
3 • Reasonable knowledge and understanding of the view that the nuclear 5–6
family is still important in society today.
• The response contains a narrow range of detailed points or a wider range
of underdeveloped points, with some use of concepts or theory or
research evidence.
2 • Basic knowledge and understanding of the view that the nuclear family is 3–4
still important in society today.
• The response contains a narrow range of underdeveloped points and may
include basic references to concepts or theories or research evidence.
1 • Limited knowledge and understanding of the view that the nuclear family 1–2
is still important in society today.
• The response contains only assertive points or common-sense
observations.
2 • Some relevant material is selected and accurately interpreted but it has 3–4
limited development or is not applied to the question.
1 • There is some attempt to apply sociological material but this is limited, 1–2
inaccurate or lacks relevance to the specific question.
5 • Very good analysis/evaluation of the view that the nuclear family is still 9–10
important in society today.
• The evaluation is clear, explicit and sustained.
4 • Good analysis/evaluation of the view that the nuclear family is still 7–8
important in society today.
• The evaluation is explicit and direct but not sustained or a more
descriptive account of evidence and arguments against the view that the
nuclear family is still important in society today.
3 • Some analysis/evaluation of the view that the nuclear family is still 5–6
important in society today.
• There is juxtaposition of different arguments and theories which are not
clearly focused on the question or a few simple points against the view
that the nuclear family is still important in society today.
2 • Basic analysis/evaluation of the view that the nuclear family is still 3–4
important in society today.
• There is an attempt to consider more than one side of the debate or one
simple point against the view that the nuclear family is still important in
society today.
1 • Limited analysis/evaluation of the view that the nuclear family is still 1–2
important in society today.
• Any analysis or evaluation is incidental, confused or simply assertive.
5 Evaluate the view that there is equality between men and women in the 26
family.
5
In support of the view Against the view
The above content is indicative and other relevant approaches to the question
should be rewarded appropriately.
Examiners should award up to 8 marks for AO1, up to 8 marks for AO2, and up to 10 marks for AO3.
4 • Good knowledge and understanding of the view that there is equality 7–8
between men and women in the family.
• The response contains a range of detailed points with good use of
concepts and theory/research evidence.
2 • Basic knowledge and understanding of the view that there is equality 3–4
between men and women in the family.
• The response contains a narrow range of underdeveloped points and may
include basic references to concepts or theories or research evidence.
1 • Limited knowledge and understanding of the view that there is equality 1–2
between men and women in the family.
• The response contains only assertive points or common-sense
observations.
2 • Some relevant material is selected and accurately interpreted but it has 3–4
limited development or is not applied to the question.
1 • There is some attempt to apply sociological material but this is limited, 1–2
inaccurate or lacks relevance to the specific question.
5 • Very good analysis/evaluation of the view that there is equality between 9–10
men and women in the family.
• The evaluation is clear, explicit and sustained.
4 • Good analysis/evaluation of the view that there is equality between men 7–8
and women in the family.
• The evaluation is explicit and direct but not sustained or a more
descriptive account of evidence and arguments against the view that
there is equality between men and women in the family.
3 • Some analysis/evaluation of the view that there is equality between men 5–6
and women in the family.
• There is juxtaposition of different arguments and theories which are not
clearly focused on the question or a few simple points against the view
that there is equality between men and women in the family.
2 • Basic analysis/evaluation of the view that there is equality between men 3–4
and women in the family.
• There is an attempt to consider more than one side of the debate or one
simple point against the view that there is equality between men and
women in the family.
1 • Limited analysis/evaluation of the view that there is equality between men 1–2
and women in the family.
• Any analysis or evaluation is incidental, confused or simply assertive.