BUMPER DESIGN Basic Catia Methodology
BUMPER DESIGN Basic Catia Methodology
OBJECTIVE:
Create the Bumper Plastic component through the given Class-A surface. To
begin with, the tooling axis for the given Class-A Surface should be created
meeting the requirements of the draft angle and perform the Draft analysis on
the model.
Introduction:
Bumper Cover – the visible outer layer that provides aesthetic appeal and
minor protection
Bumper Absorber – a foam or plastic layer designed to absorb impact
energy
Reinforcement Bar – a rigid structural member that distributes impact
forces
Mounting System – the hardware and brackets that secure the bumper to
the vehicle chassis
Today’s bumpers are engineered using a combination of materials to optimize
energy absorption and durability. One common element is a spring-like energy
absorber—often a gas-filled cartridge—that connects the bumper system to
the chassis, enabling it to handle minor collisions without permanent
deformation.
The material selection for bumpers is critical. Ideally, the material should
effectively dissipate impact energy. Metals, although strong, tend to transmit
force rather than absorb it, making them less suitable for this purpose. In
contrast, plastics and rubbers are better suited because they deform under
impact, thereby absorbing and reducing collision forces.
Given their size and structural demands, bumpers are typically manufactured
using processes such as injection moulding, blow moulding, and rotational
moulding. These methods are well-suited for shaping large plastic components
with complex geometries.
Design Flow:
Tooling Axis
Class A surfaces are freeform, visually exposed areas that must meet
the highest standards in smoothness, curvature continuity, and reflection
quality.
This classification is most commonly applied in the automotive industry,
but it is also becoming increasingly relevant in high-end consumer
products where appearance is critical.
These surfaces are developed with careful attention to both design
intent and manufacturing feasibility, often using advanced surfacing
tools in software like Alias or CATIA.
Aesthetics play a major role in Class A surfacing, which is why vehicle
exteriors—such as body panels, bumpers, and trims—are typically treated
as Class A surfaces.
The surface shown below represents the input Class A geometry
provided for this design task.
Class B Surface
The Class B surface in automotive and product design refers to the non-visible
engineering side of a component, typically located behind the Class A
(aesthetic) surface. While not exposed to the end user, it plays a crucial role in
ensuring structural integrity, fitment, and functionality.
Class B surfaces define the thickness of the part and serve as the
foundation for attaching critical engineering features.
These surfaces must follow the contours and continuity of the Class A
surface to maintain consistent wall thickness and proper moulding
conditions.
Functional elements such as ribs, screw bosses, snaps, mounting points,
and stiffeners are generally designed on Class B surfaces.
Since these surfaces are hidden from view, they do not require high
aesthetic quality or textures, but they must be optimized for
manufacturability and mechanical performance.
The image shown below illustrates the Class B surface developed for this
component, based on the provided Class A geometry.
Class C Surface
The Class C surface serves as a transitional link between the visible Class A
surface and the internal Class B surface in a component. It ensures smooth
connectivity and manufacturability by maintaining proper draft and continuity
between the two.
To convert the surface model into a solid, the Class A and Class C surfaces
are first seamlessly joined. This is done by filling gaps or extending edges
using surface tools like extrapolate and trim to ensure complete continuity.
Once all required surfaces are connected without any open edges, the geometry
forms a watertight surface. This closed geometry is then used in the Part
Design workbench, where the Closed Surface command is applied to generate
the solid body of the component.
Draft Analysis is a crucial design validation tool used in CATIA (and similar
CAD software) to evaluate whether a part can be easily ejected from the
mould during manufacturing. It checks the surfaces of a model against a
specified draft angle and highlights the results using color codes.
Passing the draft analysis confirms that the part is suitable for production
without mould release issues.