Summaries
Summaries
Assurance services are independent professional services that improve the quality of
information for decision-makers. Audits and reviews are assurance services.
The objective of an audit is to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are
free from material misstatement and to express an opinion on whether the financial
statements are properly prepared in accordance with a financial reporting framework.
An auditor should conduct an audit in accordance with ISAs and comply with IESBA's Code of
Ethics for Professional Accountants.
The IAASB aims to improve the uniformity of auditing practices and related services globally
by issuing International Standards on Auditing (ISAs).
The objective of the IESBA is to develop guidance on professional ethics in the form of the
IFAC Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants.
ISAs set out the standards for an auditor to express an independent opinion on financial
statements.
A Recognised Supervisory Body (RSB) is a professional body whose members are recognised,
by UK company law, as eligible to sign auditor's reports.
The primary duty of a statutory auditor is to express an opinion of the annual financial
statements. The auditor must have a legal right to access information and explanations to
fulfil this duty.
Generally, auditors are appointed, re-appointed and removed by the shareholders in general
meetings. Auditors may choose not to be re-appointed; they rarely resign.
Limitations of external audit arise from the nature of financial reporting, the nature of audit
procedures and the need for timely reporting at a reasonable cost.
o Division of Responsibilities
o Remuneration.
The audit committee is responsible for monitoring the integrity of the financial statements
and financial reporting controls, monitoring and reviewing the internal audit function,
overseeing the appointment of the external auditor and reviewing and monitoring the
relationship with the external auditor, including providing non-audit services.
o Integrity
o Objectivity
o Professional competence and due care
o Confidentiality
o Professional behaviour
The conceptual framework assists the auditor in identifying, evaluating and responding to
threats to compliance with the fundamental principles. The categories of threats are:
o Self-interest
o Self-review
o Advocacy
o Familiarity
o Intimidation
Safeguards are actions taken by the professional accountant (e.g. independent review).
A public interest entity (PIE) is a listed entity, or an entity required to be audited as if it were
listed, or an entity of significant public interest.
The fee dependency threshold is 15% for a PIE client and 30% for a not PIE client.
Many firms require all professional employees not to hold any financial interest in any audit
client.
A partner or employee of the firm must not serve as a director or officer of an audit client of
the firm.
Most accounting and bookkeeping services should not be provided to a PIE audit client.
A professional accountant should not use or appear to use information acquired during
professional work for personal advantage or the advantage of a third party.
o client acceptance;
o professional appointment.
Before accepting a new engagement, the nominee should contact the existing auditor to
request information relevant to accepting the nomination.
Both the prospective and existing auditors must have the entity's permission to
communicate with each other. If permission is refused, the nomination must be declined.
The existing auditor should transfer client information to the successor auditor promptly.
Audit and assurance fees cannot be based on a percentage of profits or a contingency basis.
The level of fees for the audit engagement must not compromise audit quality.
The engagement partner is responsible for quality management at the engagement level.
The permanent audit file contains information of continuing importance to the audit and
provides a history of significant audit matters.
The current audit file (CAF) contains information relevant to the audit for the current period
and is usually split into stages (e.g. interim, year-end and final).
Assembly of working papers should be completed within 60 days of signing the auditor’s
report.
Working papers should be retained for a period sufficient to meet the needs of the audit firm
and to comply with legal and professional requirements (e.g. ACCA recommends seven years
minimum).
The audit strategy establishes the scope, timing, and direction of the audit and guides the
development of the audit plan.
o determination of materiality;
The audit plan includes a description of the nature, timing and extent of:
o audit procedures for each material class of transactions and balances; and
The audit strategy and plan should be revised during the audit as evidence is gathered that
causes the auditor to reassess materiality, the risk of material misstatement and the planned
nature, timing and extent of audit procedures.
o Inquiry
o Observation
o Inspection
o Analytical procedures.
Audit risk is the risk that the auditor will express an inappropriate audit opinion on the
financial statements. It is the risk of material misstatement arising (inherent risk) which is not
prevented or corrected by the entity (control risk) or detected by the auditor (detection risk).
Inherent risk factors arise from complexity, subjectivity, change, uncertainty, and the
susceptibility to misstatement due to management bias or other fraud risk factors.
Significant risks may be non-routine (e.g. fraud) or involve significant estimation uncertainty
(e.g. complex provisions) and require special consideration (e.g. more persuasive evidence).
Control risk is assessed if the auditor plans to test the operating effectiveness of controls. If
not, the assessment of the RoMM is the same as the assessment of inherent risk.
Detection risk is managed by changing the nature, extent and timing of audit work. Detection
risk is "inversely" related to inherent risk and control risk. Low detection risk is achieved
through increased substantive procedures.
o monitoring.
The control environment, which includes the attitudes, awareness and actions of
management, provides the foundation for the operation of the system of internal control.
The entity’s risk assessment process is management’s process for identifying risks, assessing
their significance and developing approaches to address them.
The information systems include procedures to initiate, record, process, report and maintain
information needed by management and financial reporting.
Significant matters should be communicated within the entity, between management and
TCWG, and with external parties.
Control activities are policies and procedures that help manage risk. They include
authorisation and approval, reconciliations, verifications, physical or logical controls and
segregation of duties.
Monitoring is a process that evaluates the effectiveness of controls and identified and
rectifies control deficiencies.
The auditor must identify and evaluate the design of control activities (e.g. through inquiry,
observation, inspection, previous experience and walk-throughs) and whether they have
been implemented.
Materiality may be set for particular transactions, balances and disclosures for which
misstatements less than overall materiality may influence the decisions of users.
The auditor also sets performance materiality (at less than materiality for the financial
statements) to use in performing audit tests.
Factors that affect the materiality assessment include the economic decisions of users,
professional judgment, quantitative amounts and qualitative aspects.
There is an "inverse" relationship between audit risk and materiality. The amount considered
material must be decreased as the risk of misstatement increases
Management is responsible for the prevention and detection of fraud and errors.
The auditor is responsible for obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether caused by error or fraud.
The nature, timing and extent of audit procedures should change in response to the assessed
risk of material misstatement due to fraud.
Generally, the auditor does not report fraud to third parties unless there is a statutory duty
to report fraud.
The auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding compliance with
laws and regulations that directly affect the determination of material amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements.
General IT controls are implemented to address risks arising from the use of IT.
Tests of control are audit procedures designed to evaluate the operating effectiveness of
controls in preventing or detecting and correcting material misstatements at the assertion
level.
Tests of controls must be performed when the auditor decides to place reliance on them (i.e.
assesses control risk) or when substantive procedures alone are not sufficient.
Some substantive procedures must be carried out for all material account balances,
transactions and disclosures (regardless of the reliance on controls).
The procedures used to test control effectiveness are observation, inspection and re-
performance (also inquiry, but not inquiry alone).
When tests of controls identify deviations, the auditor must determine how they arose,
whether they are isolated or whether more audit evidence must be obtained from
substantive procedures.
Each control to be relied on must be tested at least once in every third audit and in the
current audit if it has changed or relates to a significant risk.
To answer exam questions related to internal controls, specify control objectives and control
activities, suggest tests of control, identify deficiencies and make recommendations.
The transaction cycles relevant to the exam are revenue, purchases, payroll, inventory, bank
and cash and non-current assets.
A deficiency in internal control exists when a control is missing or unable to prevent or detect
and correct material misstatements on a timely basis.
A significant deficiency is one of such importance that it merits the attention of TCWG. All
significant deficiencies should be reported in writing in a report to management.
The report to management generally includes a covering letter and supporting details that
describe the significant deficiencies, the possible effects, recommendations for corrective
action and management response.
The report to management should not be disclosed to third parties without management's
consent.
Internal auditors report on operational and financial risk management, internal control and
performance quality.
Internal audit is needed as organisations become large, complex, geographically diverse and
develop new products or enter new markets.
Internal auditors appear to be less objective than external auditors (because they are
employees).
The benefits of outsourcing internal audit include lower cost, consistency with external audit
and access to a broader range of skills and new techniques.
Internal auditors may issue reports that provide management with an opinion or inform
management of significant findings, conclusions and recommendations.
Audit evidence may be internal or external, oral or written, direct or indirect, or auditor-
generated.
Sufficiency (concerning quantity) depends on audit risk, reliance on effective controls, the
auditor's experience, materiality and audit findings. It also depends on the quality of the
evidence (i.e. source and reliability).
o For transactions and events and related disclosures, these are completeness,
occurrence, classification, cut-off, accuracy and presentation (COCO AP).
o For account balances and related disclosures, these are completeness, accuracy,
valuation and allocation, rights and obligations, existence, presentation and
classification (CARE PC).
Reliability is influenced by source (e.g. an external source is more reliable than internal and
written is more reliable than oral). Evidence is more persuasive if it is consistent with other
evidence.
When testing for overstatement, the direction of the testing is from the financial statements
to the supporting evidence.
When testing for understatement, the direction of the testing is from the source to the
financial statements.
Substantive procedures are performed to detect material misstatement at the assertion level
(i.e. classes of transaction, account balances and disclosures) and include:
o tests of details.
The greater the reliance placed on controls, the lower the level of substantive procedures.
The greater the risk of material misstatement, the greater the extent of substantive
procedures.
Analytical procedures are required during the planning and review stages of the audit and
may be used as substantive procedures.
Analytical procedures are performed during the planning stage to assist in understanding the
business, identifying risks of material misstatement and planning the nature, extent and
timing of further audit procedures.
Substantive analytical procedures are suitable for obtaining evidence on large volumes of
predictable transactions with effective internal controls.
Analytical procedures performed during the overall review stage assist the auditor in forming
an overall conclusion and corroborating the conclusions formed during the audit.
The auditor must investigate further when there is an unacceptable or unexpected difference
between the expected and actual analytical result.
Chapter 17: Accounting Estimates
An accounting estimate is an approximation of a monetary amount in the absence of a
precise means of measurement. Accounting estimates are subject to estimation uncertainty.
The auditor must obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that accounting estimates are
reasonable and adequately disclosed.
Management is responsible for making accounting estimates and regularly reviewing the
methods used to calculate them.
The auditor must understand the financial reporting framework and how management
develops its estimates.
The auditor performs substantive procedures to assess their reasonableness using the
following methods:
When an expert is a source of audit evidence, the auditor must consider the expert's
competence and objectivity and the relevance of the expert's work to audit assertions.
An auditor's expert is effectively a member of the audit team (i.e. competent, independent,
etc.).
The use of an expert is not mentioned when the audit opinion is unmodified.
The external auditor is responsible for the audit opinion. This responsibility cannot be
delegated or assigned to the internal auditor.
If the external auditor plans to rely on the internal auditor's work, he should assess the
internal auditor's competence, objectivity and methodology.
The external auditor should evaluate and test the internal auditor's work if seeking to rely on
it.
The external auditor cannot use the internal audit function to provide direct assistance if it
lacks sufficient competence or significant threats to its objectivity exist.
When an audit client uses a service organisation, the auditor must understand the services
provided and assess the service organisation's controls when determining the risks of
material misstatement.
The auditor may obtain sufficient appropriate evidence about a service organisation's
controls by relying on a report issued by the service organisation's auditor:
o Sample design;
o Sample selection;
o Testing;
o Evaluation.
Sample size can be determined using probability theory or professional judgment. The lower
the acceptable sampling risk, the larger the sample size.
When selecting a sample, all sampling units should have an equal chance of being selected
(for meaningful extrapolation of results). The principal methods are random selection,
systematic selection, monetary unit sample selection, haphazard selection and block
selection.
The auditor should consider the nature and cause of deviations or misstatements and
determine whether they are isolated or indicative of a common feature.
If a sample in a test of controls indicates that control risk is higher than initially assessed, the
auditor may extend the sample size, test alternative controls or extend substantive
procedures.
If the result of a sample in a test of details indicates that the potential misstatement exceeds
the tolerable misstatement, the auditor should ask management to correct identified
misstatements and then re-evaluate the uncorrected misstatements.
Statistical sampling uses random sample selection and probability theory to evaluate sample
results and measure sampling risk.
Chapter 20: Written Representations
Written representations include statements by management provided to the auditor to
confirm certain matters or support other audit evidence.
Representations include:
When representations are inconsistent with other audit evidence, the contradiction must be
resolved.
Test data incorporates correct and incorrect data, which is processed to test the effectiveness
of programmed controls and determine whether the controls are operating as intended.
Error-trapping is the programmed handling of exceptions (e.g. the error routine for a credit
sale to a customer not included in the customers master file).
Audit software, which may be off-the-shelf, bespoke or embedded, is used to process and
analyse the client's data independent of the client's system to verify the accuracy of the
system.
Audit software is widely used for data file interrogation (e.g. sequence checking and sample
selection).
Data analytics for audit is the science and art of discovering and analysing patterns,
deviations and inconsistencies, and extracting other useful information through analysis,
modelling and visualisation for planning and performing the audit.
The main benefits of ATTs are increased audit efficiency and improved accuracy that
contributes to the overall quality and reliability of the audit results.
The main challenges of ATTs are data quality and integrity and the risk of over-reliance,
which may lead to a lack of professional judgment.
Substantive Audit procedures of intangible non-current assets are similar. Specifics include:
o Obtaining evidence that capitalisation criteria are met for internally generated
research and development costs.
Key assertions for inventory include existence, valuation, rights, completeness and
presentation.
The auditor obtains evidence of the existence and condition of inventory by attending the
physical inventory count (unless impracticable).
A perpetual inventory system facilitates continuous stock-checking as an alternative to a full
physical count.
When the auditor cannot attend the inventory count, alternative procedures must be
performed (e.g. direct confirmation of inventory held by a third party).
Cut-off testing verifies that inventory, purchases and sales are recorded in the correct
accounting period. For example:
o Purchases recorded before the year end should be included in inventory (unless
sold).
o Sales recorded before the year end should be excluded from inventory.
Inventory must be measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value (IAS 2).
For manufactured goods, cost includes production overhead (i.e. absorption cost).
Standard cost and the retail method may provide acceptable approximations to actual cost.
Audit procedures to verify net realisable value include a review of post-year-end sales and
goods returns.
Confirmations can be in paper form or electronic. When receiving electronically, the auditor
should confirm the sender and the security of the content.
Negative confirmation (a request to reply only in the case of disagreement) should be used
when controls operate effectively, there are many small accounts, few errors are expected,
and recipients are expected to respond to the request.
An open confirmation asks the respondent to enter the balance and is used when testing
primarily for possible understatement.
A closed confirmation shows the balance and is used when testing primarily for
overstatement.
The auditor should control the confirmation process, including sample selection,
confirmation design and sending/receiving the confirmation.
When a response indicates disagreement, the auditor should distinguish errors from
reconciling items and perform further audit procedures if there is an increased risk of
material misstatement.
Assertions for receivable balances include existence, valuation, cut-off and rights.
Chapter 25: Share Capital, Reserves and Directors'
Remuneration
Assertions for share capital and reserves include:
o Agree opening balance, closing balances and movements during the period reported
on the statement of changes in equity (e.g. confirm proceeds of share issues to the
bank statement).
The most common reserves are retained earnings, share premium and revaluation surplus.
Audit procedures include:
o Agree that any use (e.g. to pay dividends) complies with the company's constitution
and legal and accounting requirements.
o Agree opening balance, closing balance and movements shown on the reconciliation
of movement for each reserve (e.g. recalculate transfer of excess depreciation
between revaluation surplus and retained earnings).
Directors' emoluments are material by nature. Audit procedures include the completion of a
checklist to ensure that regulatory and disclosure requirements are met.
statutory books and records are a source of audit evidence. The auditor should perform
procedures to verify that all statutory books and records have been kept as required by law.
o Confirming repayments
Obtaining direct confirmation from suppliers is a routine audit procedure unless the risk of
misstatement is low and the reconciliation of supplier statements from the client provides
sufficient reliable evidence.
To test for completeness (understatement), suppliers should be selected from purchases (or
goods received notes) and not the list of payable balances.
o Purchase invoices on the supplier's statements but not included in the client's
accounting records should be accrued if goods are received before the year end.
o Payments in the client's books but not included in the supplier's year-end statements
should appear in the following month's statement.
Review of after-date purchase invoices and payments for goods/services received before the
year end is an audit procedure for completeness of liabilities and cut-off.
o Reviewing the outcome of the prior year's provisions and contingent liabilities.
The engagement letter should include details of additional accountancy or tax services.
Involvement of owners may:
o Decrease the risk of material misstatement through effective control and the
prevention/detection of errors.
Any accountancy work carried out by the auditor may provide audit evidence but cannot
replace the evidence obtained from direct confirmation, physical inspection, etc.
Not-for-profit organisations use surplus funds to pursue goals rather than make distributions
to owners or shareholders.
o Inherent risk and the risk of material misstatement are likely to be high. Therefore
detection risk should be made low.
All critical matters should be documented, especially those involving judgments and key
decisions.
Analytical procedures are required in the final stage of the audit to assess the
reasonableness of the figures and other data presented.
The auditor should read other information to ensure there are no inconsistencies or material
misstatements of fact. If found, management should be asked to make corrections.
Events after the reporting period (IAS 10) occur between the end of the reporting period and
the date the financial statements are authorised for issue.
o Adjusting events provide further evidence about conditions existing at the end of the
reporting period.
o Before the date of the auditor's report, the auditor has an active responsibility to
gather evidence about subsequent events.
o After the date of the auditor's report but before the financial statements are issued,
management is responsible for informing the auditor about subsequent events.
o After issuing the financial statements, the auditor should consider the implications
for the auditor's report if made aware of subsequent events.
o Title
o Addressee
o Audit Opinion
o Going Concern
Key Audit Matters are matters that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, were of the most
significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period.
A "modified opinion" means that the audit opinion is other than unmodified (i.e. qualified,
adverse or disclaimed).
"Emphasis of Matter" and "Other Matter" paragraphs do not affect the audit opinion.
An "Other Matter" paragraph draws attention to a matter that is not presented or disclosed
in the financial statements but is relevant to the users' understanding of the audit, the
auditor's responsibilities or the auditor's report.
If the financial statements are not free of material misstatement due to the use of an
inappropriate accounting method or inadequate disclosure, the auditor will issue:
When the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that
the financial statements are free from material misstatement, he will issue:
Management must assess the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for at least 12
months from the end of the reporting period.
When performing risk assessment procedures, the auditor must consider whether there is
significant doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern, including
evaluating management's going concern assessment.
If doubt about the going concern assumption exists, the auditor performs specific audit
procedures to determine whether the going concern basis is appropriate.
o Qualified opinion or disclaimer of opinion if management does not make its going
concern assessment.