Deep Learning Applications Of Shortrange Radars Avik Santra instant download
Deep Learning Applications Of Shortrange Radars Avik Santra instant download
https://ebookbell.com/product/deep-learning-applications-of-
shortrange-radars-avik-santra-32739326
https://ebookbell.com/product/novel-financial-applications-of-machine-
learning-and-deep-learning-algorithms-product-modelling-and-
applications-mohammad-zoynul-abedin-48060318
https://ebookbell.com/product/current-applications-of-deep-learning-
in-cancer-diagnostics-jyotismita-chaki-48050224
https://ebookbell.com/product/current-applications-of-deep-learning-
in-cancer-diagnostics-jyotismita-chaki-48862674
https://ebookbell.com/product/multidisciplinary-applications-of-deep-
learningbased-artificial-emotional-intelligence-chiranji-lal-
chowdhary-47573630
Multidisciplinary Applications Of Deep Learningbased Artificial
Emotional Intelligence Chiranji Lal Chowdhary
https://ebookbell.com/product/multidisciplinary-applications-of-deep-
learningbased-artificial-emotional-intelligence-chiranji-lal-
chowdhary-49036524
https://ebookbell.com/product/applications-of-deep-learning-in-
electromagnetics-teaching-maxwells-equations-to-machines-maokun-
li-48490672
https://ebookbell.com/product/handbook-of-deep-learning-applications-
balas-valentina-emilia-roy-32704804
https://ebookbell.com/product/blockchain-of-things-and-deep-learning-
applications-in-construction-digital-construction-transformation-
faris-elghaish-43877436
https://ebookbell.com/product/applications-of-machine-learning-and-
deep-learning-on-biological-data-1st-edition-faheem-masoodi-49150142
Deep Learning Applications of
Short-Range Radars
All rights reserved. Printed and bound in the United States of America. No part of this book
may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including
photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission
in writing from the publisher.
All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been
appropriately capitalized. Artech House cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a
term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark.
Many product and company names that occur in this book are trademarks or registered
trademarks of their respective holders. They remain their property, and a mention does not imply
any affiliation with or endorsement by the respective holder.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Preface xiii
5 Air-Writing 179
5.1 Introduction 179
5.2 Radar Network Placement 181
5.3 Preprocessing 183
5.3.1 Coherent Pulse Integration 183
5.3.2 Moving Target Indication Filtering 183
5.3.3 Target Detection and Selection 184
5.3.4 Localization with Trilateration 185
5.3.5 Trajectory Smoothening Filters 187
5.4 Setup and Characters 188
5.4.1 Character Set 188
5.4.2 System Parameters 188
5.4.3 Setup and Data Acquistion 188
5.5 LSTM 190
5.5.1 Architecture 191
5.5.2 Loss Function: CTC 194
5.5.3 Design Considerations 196
5.5.4 Performance Evaluation 196
5.6 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks 197
5.6.1 Architecture 197
Index 327
xiii
The use and application of radar technology has grown multifold in recent years
[1]. Radar technology has migrated from military and defense applications to
being standard components in medium to premium cars. Modern automotive
radars increase safety and thus facilitate driving in both human-driven and
automotive-driven cases. Slowly, radar technology has also penetrated into the
industrial and consumer markets and is enabling several new applications.
The design of any radar system consists of two parts. The first part is radar
hardware, including a radio frequency (RF) transceiver, waveform generator,
receiver unit, antenna, and system-in-packaging. The second part is the signal
processing aspect to parse the radar return echo to extract meaningful target
information. Since the invention of integrated circuits, the operating frequency
of transistors has been steadily increasing enabling the realization of circuit blocks
that operate at frequencies up to 1 THz [2]. In parallel, transistors have been
shrinking with more advanced technology nodes, allowing for further integration
[3]. Figure 1.1 highlights the evolution of radar technology used in automotive
applications. Silicon germanium (SiGe) bipolar technology has been the preferred
silicon technology for automotive and industrial mm-wave radar over the last
few years as its performance, cost, and integration level fit superbly into the
application requirements [4,5]. The state-of-the-art SiGe technology has reached
operating frequencies beyond 300 GHz. In [6], a FE BICMOS that can be
used technology is presented with an FT of 250 GHz and a Fmax of 370 GHz
for the SiGe transistors. The present technology also provides 130-nm CMOS
that can be used for the realization of different radar building blocks like PLLs
and DSP. RF CMOS technology also has been shown to be a candidate for
mm-wave radar [7] although the RF performance is not on the same level as of
SiGe. CMOS technology offers more digital integration, which is attractive for
performing signal processing on a radar chip. The high operating frequency and
advanced packaging technologies have also allowed the integration of antennas
into a package and in some cases into the silicon die itself. Antenna integration
is essential for reducing the complexity in radar design and for reducing the
overall system cost, allowing penetration of the technology into the industrial
and consumer markets. It has been shown how different antenna configurations
can be integrated into packaging for different field of views that cover various
application requirements [8]. Going with a frequency beyond 100 GHz allows
for the integration of the antenna on silicon [9], which eventually helps to reduce
the cost and size of radar solutions.
This chapter is laid out as follows: we present and introduce the
different types of short-range radars in Section 1.1. In Section 1.2, we present
several waveform design and ambiguity functions of radar waveforms and
their properties. The system concept of a short-range radar, specifically that
of a frequency modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar, is presented in
Section 1.3. Section 1.4 presents the radar target models and their canonical
structures of any radar target. In Section 1.5, three-dimensional (3D) radar
data-cube processing is presented. The detection strategies clustering algorithms
required for short-range radars are presented in Section 1.6, and radar target
parameter estimation, namely range, velocity, and angle, are presented in
Section 1.7. A detailed introduction of common tracking algorithms namely
extended Kalman filters and unscented Kalman filters used in short-range
radars, are presented in Section 1.8. Section 1.9 presents various applications
of short-range radars in industrial, consumer, and automotive sectors.
1.1.1 CW Radar
CW radar transmits an unmodulated continuous frequency tone and the received
echo signal is processed to estimate a target’s radial velocity by evaluating the
change in phase. This is caused due to a shift in Doppler frequency arising from
the reflection of a moving target. However, CW radar has the disadvantage that
the range information cannot be obtained. Figure 1.2 shows a block diagram of a
CW radar presenting the transmit and the receive chains. However, a coarse range
estimation can be obtained by either pulse-Doppler operation or transmitting two
distinct frequency tones referred as frequency shift keying (FSK).
where f0 is the ramp start frequency, B is the bandwidth, and Tc is the chirp ramp
time.
The LFM waveform exhibits a near flat frequency response given as
π
Tc 2
S(f ) = exp −jπ f exp j (1.2)
B 4
Figure 1.3 presents the upchirp LFM waveform, where the transmit (Tx)
signal is an upchirp and the received (Rx) signal from two targets at different range
bins. The received signal from both targets are received as a superimposition of
the two at the reciever, the delay signal t is due to the varying range of the
targets, and the shifted frequency f arises due to the speed of the targets. The
received signal is mixed with the transmit signal followed by lowpass filtered, and
this signal is referred as intermodulation frequency or IF signal.
LFM being a constant amplitude waveform is desired since it allows
operating the power amplifier at saturation and thus with maximum efficiency.
Further, since the chirp time and the bandwidth can be chosen independently, it
offers flexibility to the radar system designer to meet different range and Doppler
Figure 1.3 Illustration of transmit (Tx) upchirp LFM modulated signal and corresponding
received (Rx) signal from two targets at different ranges.
Figure 1.4 Illustration of transmit (Tx) triangular waveform with sequence of upchirp LFM and
downchirp LFM and corresponding IF signal.
Thus, once the beat frequencies are determined the range and velocity of
the target can be estimated as
cTc
Rest = (fbd + fbu )
4B
λ
vest = (fbd − fbu ) (1.5)
4
This shows that in the range-velocity plot, the estimates could be calculated
by the intersection of two lines given by (1.5). However, it is easy to see that
for two targets with a different range, velocity would mean four intersecting
lines, resulting in ambiguous-range velocity assignments. To solve this problem,
staggered pulse repetition times (PRTs) with varying chirp time in subsequent
waveform are transmitted, resulting in different slopes and facilitating unique
range-velocity assignments.
In the case of a frequency modulated continuous wave, there are two critical
aspects that determine the performance of such radar systems. One is the ramp
linearity; any deviation from a linear ramp results in range estimation errors.
The other critical aspect is the Tx-Rx leakage since the transmit and receiver are
operating at the same time. The Tx-Rx leakage affects the first few range bins and
also limits the radar’s maximum detectable range since the dynamic range of the
ADC is severally affected if it is not accounted for.
There are various frequency modulation patterns that are used in practice
and in most cases require different architecture design and different processing
pipelines. Apart from sawtooth and triangular frequency modulation, some of the
other common frequency modulation patterns used in modern short-range radars
are stepped frequency or interrupted frequency modulated waveforms. Stepped
frequency modulation provides a piecewise approximation of the sawtooth
linear chirp signal. The stepped frequency modulation waveform uses the same
homodyne process as sawtooth frequency modulation but has much lower phase
noise and has less constraints on ramp linearity. However, the stepped frequency
modulation codes suffer from Doppler tolerance compared to their sawtooth
equivalents. Interrupted frequency modulation tries to combine the advantage
from pulse radar and frequency modulated continuous-wave radar. A linear
sawtooth waveform is transmitted but to avoid the Tx-Rx leakage, the transmit
signal is switched off intermittently when the receiver is receiving the echoes.
However, the interrupted frequency modulated poses a strict timing constraint
of the transmitter since the transmission time should be less than the round-trip
propagation time of the maximum detectable target.
Apart from LFM, nonlinear frequency modulation (NLFM) can be used as
transmit waveforms, which offers excellent ambiguity function properties such as
lower sidelobe levels in a trade-off to complexity. Some of the nonlinear frequency
modulations are
• Sine-based NLFM
B 2t
f (t) = fc + arcsin −1 (1.6)
π Tc
• Symmetrical NLFM
7
f (t) = fc + B a(t) + Kn sin(2π na(t))
n=1
7
· b(t) + Kn sin(2π nb(t)) (1.7)
n=1
Irrespective of the radar type, the radar range equation provides means to
the radar designer to theoretically calculate the maximum range, set transmit
power, and transmit/receive antenna gain for detection of a target with a given
radar cross section (RCS) through a radar link budget. Given the following radar
parameters and notations:
Pt : transmit power
Pr : receive power
Gt : transmit antenna gain
Gr : receive antenna gain
σ : radar cross section (RCS)
The received power at the receiver after reflection from a target with RCS
σ and at range R can be expressed as
Pt Gt σ
Pr = (1.8)
(4π R 2 )2
Gr λ2
The effective receive antenna aperture is given as Ar = 4π , thus the
effective received power can be expressed as
Pt Gt Gr σ λ2
Pr = (1.9)
(4π)3 R 4
Therefore, the maximum radar range can be provided as
1/4
Pt Gt Gr σ λ2
Rmax = (1.10)
(4π)3 Prmin
where Prmin is the minimum received power required for target detection; in
typical cases it is set 3 to 5 dB higher than the noise floor.
represented as
y(t) = sr (τ )h(t − τ )d τ (1.12)
The output SNR at time t = τa assuming white noise can thus be written as
2
ρ 2 H (f )S(f )df
SNRout (t = τa ) = (1.14)
N0 |H (f )|2 df
where N0 is the noise power.
By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, the numerator follows the following
inequality
2
H (f )S(f )df ≤ |H (f )|2 df |S(f )|2 df (1.15)
where s(t) is the transmitted waveform, and (τ , ν) are the mismatched delay and
Doppler shifts.
In the case of basic FMCW waveform, the Woodward ambiguity function
has a closed-form expression as follows
τ τ τ
χ(τ , ν) = 1 − sinc πTp ν ∓ B 1− (1.20)
Tp Tp Tp
∞
M
M
χ fmcw (τ , ν) = s(t − mTp )s(t − m Tp − τ )
−∞ m=1 m =1
Figure 1.5 (a) 3D Woodward ambiguity function of LFM waveform, (b) 2D contour of Woodward
ambiguity function of LFM waveform.
where M is the train of consecutive chirps transmitted by the radar sensor. The
Woodward ambiguity function has several properties, such as
= S(f ; τa , fa ) G ∗ (f ; τh , fh ) df (1.22)
for the cross ambiguity function, where (τh , fh ) are the hypothesized parameters in
the receiver and (τa , fa ) are the true range and Doppler parameters. s(t), S(f ) are
the time domain and frequency response of the transmitted waveform, g (t), G(f )
are the time and frequency response of the mismatched signal. The above equation
can be extended to derive a closed-form expression for a cross ambiguity function
in presence of a point target. It can also be extended to derive the ambiguity
function in the case of the colored-noise matched filter where receiver filter g (t)
is not matched to the transmit waveform. This will be a case when the noise is
not white, thus requiring a prewhitening operation provided by the colored-noise
matched filter.
with 1 transmit, 1 receive antenna. The radar features power amplifiers, low-
noise amplifiers, voltage-controlled oscillators, and analog-to-digital converters
(ADCs). The voltage-controlled oscillator module generates a linear frequency-
modulated continuous-wave signal, which is referenced through a local oscillator.
The generated LFM waveform is then amplified by the power amplifier before
being transmitted from the antenna. The receive antenna receives the target-
distorted transmit waveform, which is then amplified by the low-noise amplifier.
This receiver amplified RF signal is then mixed with the transmitted signal
followed by a lowpass filter to produce the beat intermediate frequency. The
intermediate frequency signal is then passed to the ADC for subsequent
processing. As mentioned earlier, since the intermediate frequency has low
bandwidth, the requirements for ADC and signal processing are drastically
lower compared to sampling the transmit waveform with large bandwidths, thus
enabling FMCW radars to be compact, small, and low-cost solutions.
Figure 1.7(a) depicts the de-ramping operation at the receiver. sTX (t) and
sRX (t) refers to the transmit and corresponding received chirp, respectively. The
round-trip propagation delay τ = 2R/c gets translated to intermediate frequency
after mixing at the receiver. And thus spectral analysis along the chirp provides the
range estimation of the targets in the radar’s field of view. The swept bandwidth
B determines the range resolution as δR = c/2B. The maximum unambiguous
range turns out to be Rmax = Ns δR, where Ns is the number of transmit frequency
steps. The ADC output along a single chirp is referred to as fast time in the
literature.
Figure 1.7(b) shows the frame structure of FMCW radar. The chirp
duration Tc determines the maximum detectable unambiguous Doppler
Figure 1.7 (a) Deramping processing of FMCW signal, and (b) frame structure of FMCW radar.
Correct raw data acquisition as the first step is ensured by setting the start
time and sampling frequency of the ADC so that the required NS number of
DAC/ADC samples are equally distributed within the ramp start and end. For
each frame having NRX number of Rx channel, a three-dimensional data cube
∈ C NS ×NC ×NRX containing the complex-valued baseband signals is obtained.
The first dimension contains all samples per chirp (fast-time) for range estimation,
the second dimension belongs to the different chirps per frame (slow-time) for
velocity estimation, and the third dimension corresponds to the NRX receive
antennas for angle of arrival (AoA) estimation.
In the case of multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) radar, it is
important to maintain orthogonality at the receive among transmit waveforms to
ensure independent data channel streams. By enabling MIMO configuration,
the virtual channels can be computed as a 2D convolution of the transmit
spatial and recieve spatial locations thus increasing the angular resolution and
probability of detection. The orthogonal transmit waveform can be achieved by
distributing chirps across time, frequency, and codes. Figure 1.8 depicts the time
division multiplexing (TDM), frequency division multiplexing (FDM) and slow-
time code division multiplexing (CDM) scheme [12]. Time-division multiplexed
MIMO radar is the simplest configuration and is achieved by transmitting the
same chirp in a round-robin fashion across all transmit antennas. However,
this simple configuration has the maximum unambiguous Doppler limited by
the inverse of the number of transmit antennas. In the frequency division
multiplexing configuration, each transmit antenna transmits a different part
of the frequency sweep. This configuration requires different voltage-controlled
oscillators for each transmit channel and although it preserves the maximum
unambiguous Doppler it suffers a loss of range resolution for each transmit
waveform. On the other hand, slow-time CDM makes use of all the time-
frequency resources, thus retaining the maximum unambiguous Doppler and
also the range resolution of a single-input, single-output (SISO) FMCW radar,
while at the same time increasing the number of virtual antennas leading to
enhanced angular resolutions and also increasing the probability of detection.
Figure 1.8 Chirp distribution across time, frequency, and transmit antennas: (a) time division
multiplexing, (b) frequency division multiplexing, and (c) slow-time code division
mutliplexing.
N
h(τ , ν, θ ) = an δ(τ − τn )δ(ν − νn )δ(θ − θn ) (1.23)
n=1
where h(τ , ν, θ ) is the target impulse response as a function of delay, Doppler and
azimuth angle of each scattering center represented by the parameters an , τn , νn , θn
denote the radar cross section amplitude, delay, Doppler, and angle of the nth
scattering center. The target impulse response is characterized by the super-
position of N such scattering centers. The weak scattering model has limitations
and is ill-behaved for scatterers that include edges, gentle curved plates, and
reentrant structures such as ducts and cavities. Further, the model does not capture
variations in the target impulse response arising from aspect angle changes and
other nongeometric processes. However, the weak scatterer model can be used to
understand the target response due to its geometric properties.
The radar views the space in polar coordinates, thus the 3D Cartesian
position of the kth target and its corresponding unit vector can be represented as
rk = Rk cos(θk ) sin(φk ) Rk cos(θk ) cos(φk ) Rk sin(θk )
uk = cos(θk ) sin(φk ) cos(θk ) cos(φk ) sin(θk ) (1.24)
where θk and φk are the elevation and azimuth angle, respectively, of the target
with respect to the center of the virtual radar array. For estimation of the target in
a 3D space, a MIMO configuration of at least NTX = 2 transmit elements and
NRX = 2 receive elements in an L-shaped linear array fashion with appropriate
spacing is required. This results in a virtual 2 × 2 rectangular array configuration
sufficient for estimation of target’s elevation and azimuth coordinates. As depicted
in Figure 1.9, the 3D positional coordinates of the TX element are denoted as
dmTX , m = 1, ... , NTX and the RX element as dnRX , n = 1, ... , NRX in space.
On assuming far-field conditions, the signal propagation from the TX element
dmTX to a point scatterer p and subsequently the reflection from p to RX element
dnRX can be approximated as 2Rk + dmn , where Rk is the base distance of the
kth scatterer to the center of the virtual linear array and dmn refers to the relative
position of the virtual element to the center of the array. Figure 1.9 presents
the 3D position of the target with reference to mth transmit and nth receive
antennas.
The transmit steering vector can be written as
TX dmTX u(θ , φ)
am (θ , φ) = exp −j2π ; m = 1, ... , NTX (1.25)
λ
Figure 1.9 3D position of target along with the mth transmit antenna and nth receive antenna.
presents the canonical structures, such as flat plate, top hat, trihedral corner
reflector, dihedral corner reflector, cylinder, or sphere, which comprises the target
response. The RCS response for a sphere is 1, the RCS response of some of the
structures can be expressed as
S(k, φ, θ ) = (jk)α sinc(kLn sin(φ) cos(θ)) (1.28)
where k is the wavenumber, Ln = 0 if the scattering center is localized and Ln = 0
if distributed. The parameter α has a half-integer value.
K
2fc Rk 2fc vk 2BRk
sIF (t) = exp 2π + + t (1.30)
c c cTc
k=1
estimation of the other target parameters. Alternately the target is detected in one
of the 2D slices and the other target parameter is estimated.
1.5.1 1D Processing
Figure 1.13(a) depicts the range processing step, wherein the fast time data is
transformed into range bins through a 1D FFT. The fast-time data is first applied
with a windowing function and then optionally zero-padded to increase the range
accuracy as
S −1
N
2πln
Rin (k) = r(l )w(l ) exp −j , 0≤n<Z (1.31)
Z
l =0
where Z is the zero pad length, NS is the number of ADC samples per chirp,
and Rin (k) is the range bin value at ith chirp and nth range bin on kth frame.
w(l ) is the window function and is applied to reduce the sidelobe level from
−13 dB (no windowing) to a much lower acceptable value. However, the window
function exhibits a trade-off of sidelobe levels with the main-lobe width. Thus
c
the theoretical range resolution, δr = 2B , is increased by a some factor, which is a
function of the windowing function used. Some of the standard window functions
Figure 1.13 (a) Range processing data, and (b) Doppler processing data.
where α is the forget factor, for example set to 0.01. This filtered range FFT
spectrum can then be utilized for the subsequent target detection.
Figure 1.13(b) depicts the Doppler processing step, and for the cases where
the desired signal component across Doppler is modeled as a discrete sinusoid at
Thus the matched filter output in this case of discrete sinusoid in Doppler
amounts to a discrete Fourier transform (DFT); that is,
h = σ 1 e −j2π νTPRT e −j2πν2TPRT · · · e −j2πνNc TPRT (1.35)
ws (ns ) represent the window function along fast-time and slow-time, respectively,
and for our implementation we have used the Hamming window and Kaiser
window, respectively. p, q denotes the index over range and Doppler dimensions,
respectively. It is obvious that the peaks in the range-Doppler domain occur at
2fc 2B
pk = vk + Rk
c cTc
2vk fc
qk = (1.38)
c
2f 2B
Using sawtooth FMCW with fast ramps, c c vk cTc Rk , the range peaks appear
2B
at cT R . The maximum velocity is given as
c k
c
vmax =
2fc TPRT
and the minimum velocity is
c
δv =
2fc ZNc TPRT
Figure 1.15 shows the signal processing steps to create the processed RDIs.
Following the 2D FFT to transform the data into range-Doppler domain,
background subtraction is achieved through a moving average filter as
S(p, q; nk ) = S(p, q; nk ) − SB (p, q; nk )
SB (p, q; nk + 1) = γ SB (p, q; nk ) + (1 − γ )S(p, q; nk ) (1.39)
where S(p, q; nk ) is the RDI at nkth frame, and SB (p, q; nk ) is the background RDI
at the nkth frame, and γ is the moving average coefficient.
Following the RDI generation across all virtual channels, to gain diversity
and improve signal quality, maximal ratio combining is used to combine the RDIs
from different antennas. The gains for the weighted averaging are determined
by estimating the SNR for each RDI across antennas. The effective RDI is
computed as
NRx rx
g |RDIrx |
RDIeff = rx=1 NRx rx (1.40)
rx=1 g
where RDIrx is the complex RDI of the rxth receive channel, and the gain is
adaptively calculated as
max{|RDIrx |2 }
g rx = (NTS.PN) (1.41)
NTS PN 2
m=1 |RDI (m, l )| − max{|RDIrx |2 }
rx
l =1
Figure 1.15 (a) Range processing steps, (b) Doppler processing steps, and (c) background
subtraction and combining.
where max{.} represents the maximum value from the 2D function, and
g rx represents the estimated SNR at rth receive channel. Thus the
(PN × NTS × NRx ) RDI tensor is transformed into a (PN × NTS) RDI matrix,
which is then subsequently fed to the detection algorithm.
Nv
Pl (θ) = aTx (θ) ⊗ a Rx (θ) slIF (k) (1.44)
i=1
Figure 1.17 presents the 2D slices of the 3D radar data cube that can be
processed for either RDI, RCRI, or angle-Doppler images based on different
applications for subsequent processing.
(CUT) contains a target. The detection strategy can be applied over the 3D data
cube; however, it is seldom done on an embedded processor mainly due to its
computational complexity. Figure 1.18(a) presents the detection strategy applied
to a 1D data vector, which can be the range transformation or the Doppler
transformation data. Figure 1.18(b) presents the detection strategy applied to a
2D data matrix (i.e., either a range-Doppler image, the range cross-range image,
or the angle Doppler image).
The target detection problem can be expressed as
2
1 if zcut > µσcut
zcut = 2 (1.45)
0 if zcut < µσcut
Figure 1.18 (a) 1D CFAR detector following 1D transformation, and (b) 2D CFAR detector
following 2D transformation.
that is,
N /2
N /2
2
σcut (CA) = |zlagging (r)|2 + |zleading (r)|2 (1.46)
r=1 r=1
where Pfa is the probability of false alarm and N is the window size used for noise
power estimation.
In the case of CA-CFAR, there are guard cells that are adjacent cells to the
CUT and are left out from computation of the noise variance for the threshold
for CUT. The size of the reference cells and the guard cells are hyperparameters
and are chosen to optimize target detection for a given false alarm rate. CA-CFAR
performs well for a point target; however, in the case of range or Doppler spread
targets the target scatterers are present in the reference cells and thus biasing
the noise variance estimation to higher value and missed detection. Further, CA-
CFAR elevates the noise threshold near a strong target, thus occluding or masking
nearby weaker targets leading to a low probability of detection.
The alternative CFAR detectors are smallest of CA-CFAR (SOCA-CFAR)
and greatest of CA-CFAR (GOCA-CFAR), which are given as
N /2
N /2
2 2
σcut (SOCA) = min{ |zlagging (r)| , |zleading (r)|2 }
r=1 r=1
N /2
N /2
2
σcut (GOCA) = max{ |zlagging (r)|2 , |zleading (r)|2 } (1.48)
r=1 r=1
SOCA-CFAR and GOCA-CFAR are computationally cheaper than CA-CFAR
and help in handling scenarios where the clutter and noise levels change abruptly.
However, like their CA-CFAR counterpart, they suffer from the target masking
and biased estimate issues in the case of extended targets.
Alternately for doubly spread targets, order-statistics CFAR (OS-CFAR) is
used to avoid issues of biased estimates, since the ordered statistic is robust to any
outliers. If the target’s spread lies in the reference cells the noise estimate is not
affected. In case of OS-CFAR, instead of the mean power in the reference cells,
the kth ordered data is selected as the estimated noise variance, σ 2 . A detailed
description of OS-CFAR can be found in [15,16]. In the case of heterogeneous
clutter where the noise parameters vary from one resolution cell to another,
an adaptive clutter map is adaptively computed from frame to frame for noise
statistics.
1.6.2 Clustering
Contrary to a point target, in the case of doubly extended targets, the output of the
detection algorithm is not a single detection in the RDI for a target but is spread
across range and Doppler. Thus, a clustering algorithm is required to group the
detections from a single target, based on its size, as a single cluster. This helps in
reducing the computational complexity for the target tracking algorithm, which
after clustering tracks a single target parameter instead of tracking, nonclustered
group of target parameters.
More significant than the words themselves are their occasion and
the occupation of the one who utters them. Outside of Germany,
cavalry generals who employ philosophy to bring home practical
lessons are, I think, rare. Outside of Germany, it would be hard to
find an audience where an appeal for military preparedness would
be reinforced by allusions to the Critique of Pure Reason.
Yet only by taking such statements seriously can one understand the
temper in which opinion in Germany meets a national crisis. When
the philosopher Eucken (who received a Nobel prize for contributing
to the idealistic literature of the world) justifies the part taken by
Germany in a world war because the Germans alone do not
represent a particularistic and nationalistic spirit, but embody the
"universalism" of humanity itself, he utters a conviction bred in
German thought by the ruling interpretation of German philosophic
idealism. By the side of this motif the glorification of war as a
biologic necessity, forced by increase of population, is a secondary
detail, giving a totally false impression when isolated from its
context. The main thing is that Germany, more than any other
nation, in a sense alone of all nations, embodies the essential
principle of humanity: freedom of spirit, combined with thorough
and detailed work in the outer sphere where reigns causal law,
where obedience, discipline and subordination are the necessities of
successful organization. It is perhaps worth while to recall that Kant
lived, taught and died in Königsberg; and that Königsberg was the
chief city of east Prussia, an island still cut off in his early years from
western Prussia, a titular capital for the Prussian kings where they
went for their coronations. His lifework in philosophy coincides
essentially with the political work of Frederick the Great, the king
who combined a régime of freedom of thought and complete
religious toleration with the most extraordinary display known in
history of administrative and military efficiency. Fortunately for our
present purposes, Kant, in one of his minor essays, has touched
upon this combination and stated its philosophy in terms of his own
thought.
The essay in question is that entitled "What is the Enlightenment?"
His reply in substance is that it is the coming of age on the part of
humanity: the transition from a state of minority or infancy wherein
man does not dare to think freely to that period of majority or
maturity in which mankind dares to use its own power of
understanding. The growth of this power of free use of reason is the
sole hope of progress in human affairs. External revolutions which
are not the natural expression of an inner or intellectual revolution
are of little significance. Genuine growth is found in the slow growth
of science and philosophy and in the gradual diffusion throughout
the mass of the discoveries and conclusions of those who are
superior in intelligence. True freedom is inner freedom, freedom of
thought together with the liberty consequent upon it of teaching and
publication. To check this rational freedom "is a sin against the very
nature of man, the primary law of which consists in just the advance
in rational enlightenment."
In contrast with this realm of inner freedom stands that of civil and
political action, the principle of which is obedience or subordination
to constituted authority. Kant illustrates the nature of the two by the
position of a military subordinate who is given an order to execute
which his reason tells him is unwise. His sole duty in the realm of
practice is to obey—to do his duty. But as a member not of the State
but of the kingdom of science, he has the right of free inquiry and
publication. Later he might write upon the campaign in which this
event took place and point out, upon intellectual grounds, the
mistake involved in the order. No wonder that Kant proclaims that
the age of the enlightenment is the age of Frederick the Great. Yet
we should do injustice to Kant if we inferred that he expected this
dualism of spheres of action, with its twofold moral law of freedom
and obedience, to endure forever. By the exercise of freedom of
thought, and by its publication and the education which should make
its results permeate the whole state, the habits of a nation will
finally become elevated to rationality, and the spread of reason will
make it possible for the government to treat men, not as cogs in a
machine, but in accord with the dignity of rational creatures.
Before leaving this theme, I must point out one aspect of the work
of reason thus far passed over. Nature, the sensible world of space
and time, is, as a knowable object, constituted by the legislative
work of reason, although constituted out of a non-rational sensible
stuff. This determining work of reason forms not merely the Idealism
of the Kantian philosophy but determines its emphasis upon the a
priori. The functions of reason through which nature is rendered a
knowable object cannot be derived from experience, for they are
necessary to the existence of experience. The details of this a priori
apparatus lie far outside our present concern. Suffice it to say that
as compared with some of his successors, Kant was an economical
soul and got along with only two a priori forms and twelve a priori
categories. The mental habitudes generated by attachment to a
priori categories cannot however be entirely neglected in even such
a cursory discussion as the present.
If one were to follow the suggestion involved in the lately quoted
passage as to the significant symbolism of the place of the accent in
German speech, one might discourse upon the deep meaning of the
Capitalization of Nouns in the written form of the German language,
together with the richness of the language in abstract nouns. One
might fancy that the dignity of the common noun substantive,
expressing as it does the universal or generic, has bred an
intellectual deference. One may fancy a whole nation of readers
reverently bowing their heads at each successively capitalized word.
In such fashion one might arrive at a picture, not without its truth,
of what it means to be devoted to a priori rational principles.
A number of times during the course of the world war I have heard
someone remark that he would not so much mind what the Germans
did if it were not for the reasons assigned in its justification. But to
rationalize such a tangled skein as human experience is a difficult
task. If one is in possession of antecedent rational concepts which
are legislative for experience, the task is much simplified. It only
remains to subsume each empirical event under its proper category.
If the outsider does not see the applicability of the concept to the
event, it may be argued that his blindness shows his ineptness for
truly universal thinking. He is probably a crass empiric who thinks in
terms of material consequences instead of upon the basis of
antecedent informing principles of reason.
Thus it has come about that no moral, social or political question is
adequately discussed in Germany until the matter in hand has been
properly deduced from an exhaustive determination of its
fundamental Begriff or Wesen. Or if the material is too obviously
empirical to allow of such deduction, it must at least be placed under
its appropriate rational form. What a convenience, what a resource,
nay, what a weapon is the Kantian distinction of a priori rational form
and a posteriori empirical matter. Let the latter be as brutely
diversified, as chaotic as you please. There always exists a form of
unity under which it may be brought. If the empirical facts are
recalcitrant, so much the worse for them. It only shows how
empirical they are. To put them under a rational form is but to
subdue their irrational opposition to reason, or to invade their
lukewarm neutrality. Any violence done them is more than
indemnified by the favor of bringing them under the sway of a priori
reason, the incarnation of the Absolute on earth.
Yet there are certain disadvantages attached to a priori categories.
They have a certain rigidity, appalling to those who have not learned
to identify stiffness with force. Empirical matters are subject to
revision. The strongest belief that claims the support of experience is
subject to modification when experience testifies against it. But an a
priori conception is not open to adverse evidence. There is no court
having jurisdiction. If, then, an unfortunate mortal should happen to
be imposed upon so that he was led to regard a prejudice or
predilection as an a priori truth, contrary experience would have a
tendency to make him the more obstinate in his belief. History
proves what a dangerous thing it has been for men, when they try
to impose their will upon other men, to think of themselves as
special instruments and organs of Deity. The danger is equally great
when an a priori Reason is substituted for a Divine Providence.
Empirically grounded truths do not have a wide scope; they do not
inspire such violent loyalty to themselves as ideas supposed to
proceed directly from reason itself. But they are discussable; they
have a humane and social quality, while truths of pure reason have a
paradoxical way, in the end, of escaping from the arbitrament of
reasoning. They evade the logic of experience, only to become, in
the phrase of a recent writer, the spoil of a "logic of fanaticism."
Weapons forged in the smithy of the Absolute become brutal and
cruel when confronted by merely human resistance.
The stiffly constrained character of an a priori Reason manifests
itself in another way. A category of pure reason is suspiciously like a
pigeonhole. An American writer, speaking before the present war,
remarked with witty exaggeration that "Germany is a monstrous set
of pigeonholes, and every mother's son of a German is pigeoned in
his respective hole—tagged, labeled and ticketed. Germany is a huge
human check-room, and the government carries the checks in its
pocket." John Locke's deepest objection to the older form of the a
priori philosophy, the doctrine of innate ideas, was the readiness
with which such ideas become strongholds behind which authority
shelters itself from questioning. And John Morley pointed out long
ago the undoubted historic fact that the whole modern liberal social
and political movement has allied itself with philosophic empiricism.
It is hard here, as everywhere, to disentangle cause and effect. But
one can at least say with considerable assurance that a hierarchically
ordered and subordered State will feel an affinity for a philosophy of
fixed categories, while a flexible democratic society will, in its crude
empiricism, exhibit loose ends.
There is a story to the effect that the good townspeople of
Königsberg were accustomed to their watches by the time at which
Kant passed upon his walks—so uniform was he. Yielding to the
Teutonic temptation to find an inner meaning in the outer event, one
may wonder whether German thought has not since Kant's time set
its intellectual and spiritual clocks by the Kantian standard: the
separation of the inner and the outer, with its lesson of freedom and
idealism in one realm, and of mechanism, efficiency and organization
in the other. A German professor of philosophy has said that while
the Latins live in the present moment, the Germans live in the
infinite and ineffable. His accusation (though I am not sure he meant
it as such) is not completely justified. But it does seem to be true
that the Germans, more readily than other peoples, can withdraw
themselves from the exigencies and contingencies of life into a
region of Innerlichkeit which at least seems boundless; and which
can rarely be successfully uttered save through music, and a frail
and tender poetry, sometimes domestic, sometimes lyric, but always
full of mysterious charm. But technical ideas, ideas about means and
instruments, can readily be externalized because the outer world is
in truth their abiding home.
II
GERMAN MORAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
That is, the relation between the world of space and time where
physical causality reigns and the moral world of freedom and duty is
not a symmetrical one. The former cannot intrude into the latter. But
it is the very nature of moral legislation that it is meant to influence
the world of sense; its object is to realize the purposes of free
rational action within the sense world. This fact fixes the chief
features of Kant's philosophy of Morals and of the State.
It is a claim of the admirers of Kant that he first brought to
recognition the true and infinite nature of the principle of Personality.
On one side, the individual is homo phenomenon—a part of the
scheme of nature, governed by its laws as much as any stone or
plant. But in virtue of his citizenship in the kingdom of supersensible
Laws and Ends, he is elevated to true universality. He is no longer a
mere occurrence. He is a Person—one in whom the purpose of
Humanity is incarnate. In English and American writings the terms
subjective and subjectivism usually carry with them a disparaging
color. Quite otherwise is it in German literature. This sets the age of
subjectivism, whose commencement, roughly speaking, coincides
with the influence of Kantian thought, in sharp opposition to the age
of individualism, as well as to a prior period of subordination to
external authority. Individualism means isolation; it means external
relations of human beings with one another and with the world; it
looks at things quantitatively, in terms of wholes and parts.
Subjectivism means recognition of the principle of free personality:
the self as creative, occupied not with an external world which limits
it from without, but, through its own self-consciousness, finding a
world within itself; and having found the universal within itself,
setting to work to recreate itself in what had been the external
world, and by its own creative expansion in industry, art and politics
to transform what had been mere limiting material into a work of its
own. Free as was Kant from the sentimental, the mystic and the
romantic phases of this Subjectivism, we shall do well to bear it in
mind in thinking of his ethical theory. Personality means that man as
a rational being does not receive the end which forms the law of his
action from without, whether from Nature, the State or from God,
but from his own self. Morality is autonomous; man, humanity, is an
end in itself. Obedience to the self-imposed law will transform the
sensible world (within which falls all social ties so far as they spring
from natural instinct desire) into a form appropriate to universal
reason. Thus we may paraphrase the sentence quoted from Kant.
The gospel of duty has an invigorating ring. It is easy to present it as
the most noble and sublime of all moral doctrines. What is more
worthy of humanity, what better marks the separation of man from
brute, than the will to subordinate selfish desire and individual
inclination to the commands of stern and lofty duty? And if the idea
of command (which inevitably goes with the notion of duty) carries a
sinister suggestion of legal authority, pains and penalties and of
subservience to an external authority who issues the commands,
Kant seems to have provided a final corrective in insisting that duty
is self-imposed. Moral commands are imposed by the higher,
supranatural self upon the lower empirical self, by the rational self
upon the self of passions and inclinations. German philosophy is
attached to antitheses and their reconciliation in a higher synthesis.
The Kantian principle of Duty is a striking case of the reconciliation
of the seemingly conflicting ideas of freedom and authority.
Unfortunately, however, the balance cannot be maintained in
practice. Kant's faithful logic compels him to insist that the concept
of duty is empty and formal. It tells men that to do their duty is their
supreme law of action, but is silent as to what men's duties
specifically are. Kant, moreover, insists, as he is in logic bound to do,
that the motive which measures duty is wholly inner; it is purely a
matter of inner consciousness. To admit that consequences can be
taken into account in deciding what duty is in a particular case would
be to make concessions to the empirical and sensible world which
are fatal to the scheme. The combination of these two features of
pure internality and pure formalism leads, in a world where men's
acts take place wholly in the external and empirical region, to
serious consequences.
The dangerous character of these consequences may perhaps be
best gathered indirectly by means of a quotation.
And if he differs from Fichte, it is but in the assertion that since the
laboring class is the one to whom the need most directly appeals, it
is workingmen who must take the lead in the development of the
true functions of the State.
Pantheism is a philosophic nickname which should be sparingly
employed; so also should the term Monism. To call Fichte's system
an ethical pantheism and monism is not to say much that is
enlightening. But with free interpretation the designation may be
highly significant in reference to the spiritual temper of the Germany
of the first part of the nineteenth century. For it gives a key to the
presentiment of what Germany needed to fulfill its mission.
It is a commonplace of German historians that its unity and
expansion to a great state powerful externally, prosperous internally,
was wrought, unlike that of any other people, from within outward.
In Lange's words, "our national development started from the most
ideal and approximated more and more to the real." Hegel and
Heine agree that in Germany the French Revolution and the
Napoleonic career were paralleled by a philosophic revolution and an
intellectual empire. You recall the bitter word that, when Napoleon
was finally conquered and Europe partitioned, to Germany was
assigned the kingdom of the clouds. But this aërial and tenuous
kingdom became a mighty power, working with and in the statesmen
of Prussia and the scholars of Germany to found a kingdom on the
solid earth. Spiritual and ideal Germany made common cause with
realistic and practical Prussia. As says Von Sybel, the historian of the
"Founding of the German Empire":
ebookbell.com