Hoa Phat Group Analysist About Hoa Phat
Hoa Phat Group Analysist About Hoa Phat
GROUP REPORT
FINANCIAL
ANALYSIS
GROUP MEMBERS
PEER ASSESSMENT
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GROUP MEMBERS ..................................................................................................... i
PEER ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................. ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................iii
1. OVERVIEW OF HOA PHAT JOINT STOCK COMPANY .............................. 1
1.1. Introduction to Hoa Phat Group Joint Stock Company (HPG) ............................ 1
1.2 Formation and development .................................................................................. 1
1.3. Main lines of business .......................................................................................... 2
1.4. Member companies .............................................................................................. 2
1.5. Shares of Hoa Phat Group .................................................................................... 2
1.6. Senior personnel structure of Hoa Phat Group .................................................... 3
1.7. Position and direct competitors ............................................................................ 3
1.7.1. Company position .......................................................................................... 3
1.7.2. Direct competitors ......................................................................................... 4
2. GENERAL INFORMATION OF STEEL INDUSTRY & INVESTOR
STATEMENT ............................................................................................................... 5
2.1. Industry characteristics......................................................................................... 5
2.1.1. Line of business .............................................................................................. 5
2.1.2. Main features of the steel industry................................................................. 5
2.2. Investor statement ................................................................................................ 6
2.3. Analysis process of HPG ..................................................................................... 6
3. GENERAL ANALYSIS OF HOA PHAT’S FINANCIAL STATEMENT ......... 8
3.1. Income statement ................................................................................................. 8
3.2. Balance sheet ........................................................................................................ 9
3.3. Statement of cash flows ..................................................................................... 13
4. DETAILED ANALYSIS OF HOA PHAT’S FINANCIAL STATEMENT ...... 17
4.1. Profitability ratios............................................................................................... 17
4.1.1. Return on Sales ............................................................................................ 17
4.1.2. Return on Investment ................................................................................... 18
4.1.3. Comparison with Hoa Sen Group (HSG) .................................................... 20
4.2. Activity ratio ...................................................................................................... 22
4.2.1. Analysis activity ratio of Hoa Phat Group .................................................. 22
iii
4.2.2. Comparison with Hoa Sen and the industry average in 2022 ..................... 27
4.3. Liquidity ratio ..................................................................................................... 28
4.3.1. Analysis liquidity ratio of Hoa Phat Group ................................................. 28
4.3.2. Comparison of the liquidity of Hoa Phat to Hoa Sen Group and the whole
steel industry in 2022 ............................................................................................. 30
4.4. Solvency ratio ..................................................................................................... 31
4.4.1. Total debt ratio ............................................................................................ 31
4.4.2. Debt to equity ratio ...................................................................................... 32
4.4.3. Interest coverage ratio ................................................................................. 33
4.5. Market value ratio .............................................................................................. 33
5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. 38
5.1. Conclusion.......................................................................................................... 38
5.2. Recommendations .............................................................................................. 38
REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 40
iv
Head office Pho Noi A Industrial Area, Giai Pham Commune, Yen My
District, Hung Yen Province
Website http://www.hoaphat.com.vn
Top Strongest Brand in Vietnam; Vietnam Gold Star, Top 50 most effective business
companies in Vietnam; Top 30 largest corporate income tax payers in Vietnam, 20
business brands valued at over $100 million by Forbes Vietnam magazine, Top 10
famous Vietnamese brands…
b. Randomness
High volatility, many uncertain conditions, possible change in production plan
midway, and possible problems during production (equipment failure, need for repair,
change of delivery date, hot steel) does not meet standard quality…)
c. Limitation
The raw ore needs to be processed before it can be made into steel, the waiting time
of each furnace needs to be shorter than the time required by the roughing process. In
order to increase the output, the casting machines need to work continuously.
Furthermore, some equipment needs regular maintenance, for example, those in the kiln
area. They are the rules to follow when planning production.
d. Many objects
The finished product yield rate and production time need to be improved. Those are
the most important goals to consider in steel production management. In addition, using
resources efficiently, reducing costs, meeting delivery deadlines according to customer
requirements and many other things need to be managed as objects in the metal
production process. Different goals also have different effects on how a particular
problem is handled.
e. Continuity
In the steel production process of enterprises, the raw material conveyor should be
operated in the most efficient way. Lines need to be closely linked, and concurrent
production lines need to be considered in order to realize the harmony between
production plans and the ability to handle errors when there is a problem. Managers also
need to recognize the balance between resources including the division of duties across
different steel-making furnaces, lathes, casting machines, rolling mills, and furnaces.
For each of the 5 types of ratios, there are various different ratios that can be
calculated. We have chosen to focus on the ratios that we consider to be the most
important for our evaluation. These ratios are calculated based on the financial reports
of HPG over the past 5 years, as well as the ratios of the company's competitors and the
industry as a whole. The ratios of the company’s competitors and the industry average
are collected in two websites Vietstock.vn and Investing.com. The reasons for any
changes in the ratios will be identified from our perspective, as well as from the
reference of various articles and analyses on HPG. Details of the references will be
listed in the reference section.
Step 3: We will provide our overall conclusions and evaluations of HPG's financial
situation in the 2018-2022 period, focusing on 2022 to make predictions about HPG's
future development. We will also decide whether to invest in HPG or not and make
recommendations for the company.
From the above statement and chart, we have some analysis below:
• A pretty stable trend of growth of Hoa Phat’s revenue and cost. No
significant discrepancy between the two items. As a result, Hoa Phat got a much
flatter profit before tax line.
• In 2021, net income sharply increased from 90.118 billion VND to
149.679 billion VND (approximately 66%).
• In 2022, Hoa Phat's COS increased by 14,8% (an increase of
approximately 12-14 billion VND).
• In 2022, revenue also decreased by 8.000 billion VND.
• In 2022, Hoa Phat's financial cost increased sharply by 88% due to
realized exchange rate losses as well as losses from revaluation of foreign
currency principal debt items this period increased by 6,5 times to more than
1.270 billion VND; Loan costs increased by 20% due to high interest rates.
Net income in 2022 decreased sharply (from 34.520 billion VND to 8.444 billion
VND, by 75,5%).
In general: HPG's Revenue has increased over the last 5 years, but it is also
accompanied by an increase in total costs with a similar level, making profits seem to
have no growth after 5 years. Especially, just within 1 year, from 2021 to 2022, there
was a significant drop in revenue and an unusual increase in costs. We'll learn more
about that anomaly in the next section, where we calculate and analyze financial ratios
to investigate the cause.
LIABILITIES
10
Short-term accrued
0,33% 0,42% 0,49% 0,43% 0,27%
expenses
Short-term unearned
0,01% 0,03% 0,03% 0,01% 0,01%
revenues
Other short-term
0,38% 0,23% 0,25% 0,59% 0,25%
payments
Long-term unearned
0,00% 0,00% 0,01% 0,01% 0,00%
revenues
Other long-term
0,05% 0,06% 0,05% 0,04% 0,04%
payments
Total non-current
19,23% 26,53% 15,45% 7,85% 6,95%
liability
EQUITY
11
Development and
1,17% 0,91% 0,71% 0,52% 0,49%
investment funds
12
Figure 3.3. The change in PPE & Long-term Asset in progress's HPG
13
14
common stock
2. Proceeds from borrowings 53.472 69.584 83.074 125.075 135.250
3. Payments to settle loan
principals (42.335) (57.194) (65.604) (121.653) (134.771)
4. Payments of dividends (6) (13) (1.419) (1.693) (2.261)
Net cash flows from financing
activities 11.143 12.378 16.054 1.740 (1.778)
Net cash flows during the
period (1.748) 2.029 9.146 8.792 (14.127)
Cash and cash equivalents at
the beginning of the year 4.265 2.516 4.545 13.696 22.471
Effect of exchange rate
fluctuations (1) 6 (16) (20)
Cash and cash equivalents at
the end of the year 2.516 4.545 13.696 22.471 8.325
After evaluating HPG's cash flow performance in 2022, we have the following
observations:
• Cash flow from investment activities was the main source of cash flow,
which is not ideal as manufacturing companies should have their main cash flow
from operating activities to give an initial good view of the company's financial
situation.
• Although cash flow from operating activities was positive, it was still not
enough to cover capital expenditures, resulting in HPG's free cash flow (FCF)
being negative. This is a sign that the company has reduced income or has stalled
and cannot continue to grow.
• The main factor affecting changes in cash flow from operating activities
was a significant decrease in payable and other liabilities, as well as a decrease
in inventory.
• Due to large cash flow from investment activities and a decline in cash
flow from the other two activities, HPG's net cash flow in 2022 was heavily
negative.
• The question is why HPG invested a large amount of money in investment
activities despite the unfavorable financial situation? The reason is refinancing
activities, in the proceeds from borrowing in the financial activities section.
These borrowings help the company purchase and invest more in fixed assets
and other long-term assets.
15
Based on our evaluation of HPG's cash flow performance in 2022 and the changes
that have occurred during the 5-year period from 2018 to 2022, we have the following
observations:
• Cash flow from investing activities remains the main source of cash flow.
In particular, a significant amount of capital expenditures is attributed to the
increased refinancing activites of HPG over the years.
• Looking at the components of the cash flow from investing activities,
there have been significant changes. Inventory levels steadily increased from
2018 to 2021, but then decreased sharply in 2022. The same trend was observed
for payables and other liabilities.
• Although the cash flow from operating activities has been positive in all
years, when measured as a percentage of net revenue (as shown in Table 3.4),
2022 had a lower percentage compared to previous years, except for 2021.
• The company's borrowing activities have also affected the following
components: interest paid has steadily increased over the years, and spending on
debt instruments of other entities increased significantly in 2021.
16
17
In general, from 2018 to 2022, the Gross profit margin and the Net profit
margin fluctuated the same. During 2018-2022, both Gross profit margin and Net
profit margin decreased.
Although peaking in 2021, both Gross profit margin and Net profit margin fell
sharply in 2022. The main reason was: in 2022 net revenue decreased slightly
compared to 2021 but Cost of goods sold increased sharply. The reasons were:
- The development of the real estate industry at the beginning of the year was
hot, cooling and freezing at the end of the year, which was the main reason for the
decline in consumption and construction steel price, leading to a gradual decrease in
steel revenue in 2022.
- The energy crisis from the Russia-Ukraine war has pushed the price of coking
coal (one of the two main raw materials of steelmaking by blast furnaces) to
skyrocket, resonating with the influence of slow consumption and low selling prices
due to weak demand, causing the cost of goods sold to increase sharply in 2022.
18
19
Overall, from 2018 to 2022, ROE and ROA fluctuated the same. In particular,
ROE in 2021 nearly doubled compared to 2018 and ROA in 2021 also increased much
more than that in 2018. Because 2021 is considered a brilliant year for the steel industry,
Hoa Phat also achieved a record profit of 34,521 billion, up 155% over the previous
year. The driving force behind Hoa Phat's profit in the past year was the commissioning
of Dung Quat Hoa Phat steel plant (phase 1) and the galloping increase in steel prices
in the international market in the first half of 2021.
However, in 2022, there was a serious decline in ROE and ROA because ROE
decreased by more than 36% and ROA decreased by nearly 18%. The reason was that
in 2022, Average total equity and Average total asset increased while Net revenue
decreased, leading to a sharp decrease in Net profit. The reason for the decline was
mentioned in Section 4.1.1.
From the chart, as can be seen, ROE of HPG and HSG both decreased from
2018-2019 before increasing sharply in the period of 2020-2021 and falling sharply in
2022. This is the general profit trend of the steel industry because it is a cyclical
industry.
The ROE of HSG fluctuated more strongly than the ROE of HPG.
Table 4.6. Comparison ROE between HPG and HSG
20
To maintain high ROE, both HPG and HSG use financial leverage. However, the
use of these two corporations is entirely different:
- HSG:
+ Financial Leverage fluctuated around 3 during the prosperous steel
industry period (2020-2021), even up to 4 in 2018. This shows that
equity/total assets is low, debt accounts for the majority of total assets. =>
High risk.
+ Despite borrowing much, HSG's net profit margin is also not very
positive. This index only fluctuated from 1.29% to 8.85% during the
prosperous period of the steel industry.
+ When the steel industry faced difficulties in 2022, interest expenses begin
to “erode” profits due to fluctuations in raw material prices as well as the
slowdown of the real estate industry, Net profit margin was even only
0.51% and ROE plummeted to 2.31% (down more than 47% compared to
2021).
- HPG:
+ HPG's ROE grew steadily by maintaining Financial Leverage at a
manageable level. Specifically, during the prosperous or no longer
prosperous period, HPG always kept the Financial Leverage fluctuating
around 2. This helps HPG not to be “eroded” by interest expenses, despite
the decline in ROE.
+ It can be seen that the use of financial leverage of HPG is more effective
than that of HSG. When the Net profit margin of HPG is always high
(from 9% in a crisis year to 45.05% in a prosperous year) and much higher
than HSG.
21
22
23
24
Figure 4.5. The Change in Receivables turnover and Collection period of HPG
25
From the above tables and graphs, we can conclude some major points:
- In the period 4 years from 2018 to 2021, Hoa Phat’s revenue increased
substantially and the inventory rose gradually to ensure that company always had
goods to sell => Inventory turnover decreased
+ Moreover, Hoa Phat had better business partners, more optimal sales
policy (shorter time to receive money from customers) and good debt
collection ability from customers => Receivables turnover increased
+ In 2021 the company is focusing on implementing many big projects, so
Hoa Phat’s average trade payables increase fastly to meet the need for
expansion => Payable turnover suddenly decreased in this year
26
4.2.2. Comparison with Hoa Sen and the industry average in 2022
We compare some Hoa Phat’s ratios in 2022 with Hoa Sen (The main
competitors) and the industry average:
Table 4.13. Comparison Assets turnover between HPG, HSG and Industry
average
27
As we can see the statistics in the table, inventory and receivables turnover of
Hoa Phat is higher than industry average, which shows that in 2022, Hoa Phat has better
inventory and receivables management policy than Hoa Sen (the main competitor of
Hoa Phat) and almost company in the steel industry of Vietnam. With the total assets
turnover, Hoa Phat is less than Hoa Sen and industry average, but it was not too bad in
the background of a negative economy and decrease in steel demand. In the year 2022
with many difficulties and fluctuations, the investors can be optimistic about the
prospect of Hoa Phat in the future.
Current Assets
25.309 30.437 56.747 94.155 80.515
(billion VND)
Inventory
14.115 19.412 26.287 42.134 34.491
(billion VND)
Cash
2.515 4.545 13.696 22.471 8.325
(billion VND)
28
Current Liabilities
22.636 26.984 51.975 73.459 62.385
(billion VND)
- Over the last 5 years, there is an increase in trend of Current Ratio and Quick
Ratio, and reach the top of the time series in 2022. In general, the Current Ratio over
the years never falls below 1, which expresses good liquidity. Following the
conservative basis, we calculate Quick Ratio and Cash Ratio, too. The Quick Ratios
over 5 years show us the same things as Current Ratios did. Especially, in 2021, all
three ratios reach the top (or near top). According to our understanding, Hoa Phat’s
business went well in 2021, which led to a high net profit and high amount of cash from
operating activities (profit in 2021 increased by 66% compared to that of 2020).
- The Cash Ratios, however, express another aspect of liquidity, where we
recognize a sudden and significant decrease in the ability of Hoa Phat to generate
enough cash to pay for its current liabilities. According to our deep research of the
market and the operation of the company over the year 2022, we see that there is a big
decrease in revenue of Hoa Phat corporation which goes along with an increase in COS
and other different types of expenses, which is also the main purpose for a bad Cash
Ratio index in 2022.
+ During 2022, revenue decreased by 8.000 billion VND. Due to inflation in the
US and Europe along with China's "Zero Covid" policy, which reduced steel
demand in Hoa Phat's main export markets.
29
+ In 2022, Hoa Phat's COS increased by 14,8% (an increase of approximately 12-
14 billion) due to the impact of coal price fluctuations stemming from the Russia-
Ukraine war from February 2022. The price of HCC coal continuously peaked
in the first 6 months of 2022, reaching 670 USD, up 96% compared to December
2021, which is the main reason leading to the sharp increase in Hoa Phat's
production cost.
+ In 2022, Hoa Phat's financial cost increased sharply by 88% due to realized
exchange rate losses as well as losses from revaluation of foreign currency
principal debt items this period increased by 6,5 times to more than 1.270 billion
VND; Loan costs increased by 20% due to high interest rates
→ Net income in 2022 decreased sharply (from 34.520 billion VND to 8.444 billion
VND, by 75,5%) → Cash from operating activities fell significantly during this year
and negatively impacted on the Cash Ratio of Hoa Phat.
We assess Current Ratio and Quick Ratio show a good trend over the years, but a
low demand of steel raises a suspicion of liquidity of inventory of Hoa Phat, and we
hesitate whether we should completely evaluate the liquidity of the company based on
the ratios which consist of inventory items. Actually, the bad cash situation of Hoa Phat
is just an abnormal event because of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and we
highly expect a strong return from Hoa Phat. However, if the conflict continues for too
long, and there is no sign from the company that they have any alternative policies to
face the risk of high COS and low demand for their product, we’ll reject the company
from our potential investment list.
4.3.2. Comparison of the liquidity of Hoa Phat to Hoa Sen Group and the
whole steel industry in 2022
Table 4.16. Liquidity Ratios Comparison
30
Sen is also much lower than Hoa Phat, which is equal to just 0,05, which expresses a
really bad cash situation. This fact proves that Hoa Phat is not so bad in the cash
situation in this conscious industry.
- The industry average also points out something about Hoa Phat if we make the
comparisons. All ratios in 2022 of the company are higher than IA, which means the
effect of political conflict had a negative impact on the whole industry, not just Hoa
Phat, and we highly expect that, when everything comes back to normal again, Hoa Phat
can jump out of the crisis and return strongly.
4.4. Solvency ratio
Table 4.17. Solvency ratio formula
31
Figure 4.10. Trend of Hoa Phat’s Total debt ratio and Debt to equity ratio
32
33
34
The EPS value will correspondingly change with the fluctuation of the stock
price. For example, in 2021, if the stock price is 46,400 VND and the EPS is 7,700
VND, it means investors/the market are willing to pay 6 units to exchange for 1 unit of
earnings. This is also known as the P/E ratio below:
Table 4.24. Price-to-Earnings Ratio and Price-to-Book Ratio (P/E) of HPG
Figure 4.11. Market price per Share and Earning per Share of HPG
However, looking at the P/E ratio, although the stock price and EPS were high
in 2021, the amount of money that investors are willing to pay for 1 unit of profit was
the lowest in 5 years. This may explain why the stock value is being undervalued and
investors have low expectations for growth in the near future. In contrast, in 2022,
although the stock price and EPS were both low, the P/E ratio was the highest in recent
years. This could be because investors have high expectations for the stock price
increase, leading to a high increase in buying volume, which is also one of the reasons
causing the stock price to decrease.
35
One other ratio we consider is the P/B ratio. Four years before 2022, the stock
price was one and a half times higher than the book value of the stock (2018), and even
doubled in 2020 and 2021. However, in 2022, this ratio was approximately equal to 1.
A P/B ratio greater than 1 indicates that the stock is expected to have high growth
potential. The ratio for the year 2022 being close to 1 can be explained as follows:
• The net asset value is higher than the market capitalization of the stock - This
was true for years prior to 2022, but not for 2022.
• The company is in the recovery process, and its business results are gradually
improving, with increasing profits that help increase the book value at a faster
rate than the stock price - This may be true since 2022 is a period of recovery not
only for companies but also for the economy, although there are still many
challenges, the toughest phase has passed.
And to compare the company's situation with its industry peers specifically and
the industry as a whole, we have the following table:
Table 4.25.
• HPG is also focusing all its efforts on the $3 billion Dung Quat 2 project, which
is in the construction phase and, if successful, will elevate Hòa Phát's position in
the manufacturing market, not only domestically but also internationally.
• The conglomerate also has a good corporate governance strategy. In the
recession period such as 2022, HPG was one of the proactive businesses to cut
some projects to stabilize its financial situation and help HPG overcome the
difficult period, maintaining its top position in the industry.
37
5.2. Recommendations
In the background of a negative global economy and the difficulties in the steel
industry, we are skeptical of the company’s future potential from the perspective of
long-term investors. To attract more attentions of the investors in the future, ensuring
the effectiveness of manufacturing systems and follow sustainable development, we, in
the perspective of long-term investors, suggest the company some recommendations:
- To be ready to compete, companies in the steel industry need to continuously
improve and innovate to improve productivity and product quality in the context
of declining steel demand by applying AI into operation. For example, Hoa Phat
38
39
REFERENCES
1. Hoa Phat Group (2019). Báo cáo tài chính hợp nhất sau kiểm toán năm 2018.
Retrieved 1/4/2023, from https://file.hoaphat.com.vn/hoaphat-com-vn/uploads/BCTC-
HN-sau-kiem-toan-31.12.18_TV.pdf.
2. Hoa Phat Group (2020). Báo cáo tài chính hợp nhất sau kiểm toán năm 2019.
Retrieved 1/4/2023, from https://file.hoaphat.com.vn/hoaphat-com-vn/2020/03/bchn-
2019-sau-kiem-toan-compressed.pdf.
3. Hoa Phat Group (2021). Báo cáo tài chính hợp nhất sau kiểm toán năm 2020.
Retrieved 1/4/2023, from https://file.hoaphat.com.vn/hoaphat-com-vn/2021/03/hpg-
bao-cao-tai-chinh-hop-nhat-nam-2020-sau-kiem-toan.pdf.
4. Hoa Phat Group (2022). Báo cáo tài chính hợp nhất sau kiểm toán năm 2021.
Retrieved 1/4/2023, from https://file.hoaphat.com.vn/hoaphat-com-vn/2022/03/bao-
cao-tai-chinh-hop-nhat-nam-2021-sau-kiem-toan-1.pdf.
5. Hoa Phat Group (2023). Báo cáo tài chính hợp nhất sau kiểm toán năm 2022.
Retrieved 1/4/2023, from https://file.hoaphat.com.vn/hoaphat-com-
vn/2023/03/20220320-hpg-bao-cao-tai-chinh-hop-nhat-sau-kiem-toan-nam-2022.pdf.
6. Vietstock (2023). CTCP Tập đoàn Hoa Sen (HOSE: HSG). Retrieved 16/4/2023,
from https://finance.vietstock.vn/HSG-ctcp-tap-doan-hoa-sen.htm.
7. Investing.com (2023). Hoasen Group (HSG). Retrieved 16/4/2023, from
https://www.investing.com/equities/hoasen-group-ratios
8. Simplize (2023). HPG (HOSE). Retrieved 28/4/2023, from https://simplize.vn/co-
phieu/HPG/bao-cao.
9. Hải Đường (2022). Hòa Phát: Doanh thu 2021 lập kỷ lục, lợi nhuận vượt 92% kế
hoạch khi đạt hơn 34.500 tỷ. Retrieved 24 April 2023, from
https://vietnamfinance.vn/hoa-phat-doanh-thu-2021-lap-ky-luc-loi-nhuan-vuot-92-ke-
hoach-khi-dat-hon-34500-ty-20180504224264306.htm.
10. Đại Hà (2022). Tồn kho kỷ lục, Hoà Phát bị thổi bay 60% lợi nhuận. Retrieved 25
April 2023, from https://laodong.vn/kinh-doanh/ton-kho-ky-luc-hoa-phat-bi-thoi-bay-
60-loi-nhuan-1077454.ldo.
11. Lan Hạ (2023). Hứng 4 “cú đấm” khiến lỗ kỷ lục trong quý cuối năm, Hòa Phát
đã làm gì?. Retrieved 20 April 2023, from https://cafef.vn/hung-4-cu-dam-khien-lo-
ky-luc-trong-quy-cuoi-nam-hoa-phat-da-lam-gi-
20230131082122454.chn?fbclid=IwAR225wcP2LEMN2HY6oAVrAks1fkj807WfbT
5KsHhhOrp_Kz4IqAV37jKvMw.
12. Nguyên Phương (2019). Nhận diện đối thủ trên đường Nam tiến của “vua thép”
Trần Đình Long. Retrieved 18 April 2023, from https://danviet.vn/nhan-dien-doi-thu-
tren-duong-nam-tien-cua-vua-thep-tran-dinh-long-77771014753.htm.
13. Brade Mar. Các đối thủ cạnh tranh của Hòa Phát. Retrieved 18 April 2023, from
https://brademar.com/cac-doi-thu-canh-tranh-cua-hoa-
phat/#:~:text=C%C3%A1c%20%C4%91%E1%BB%91i%20th%E1%BB%A7%20c%
40
E1%BA%A1nh%20tranh%20c%E1%BB%A7a%20H%C3%B2a%20Ph%C3%A1t%2
0bao%20g%E1%BB%93m,%2C%20Vinausteel%2C%20Hoa%20Sen%20Group.
14. Kiều Linh (2023). Hòa Phát tiếp tục báo lỗ tăng mạnh, gần 2.000 tỷ đồng trong
Quý 4/2022. Retrieved 22 April 2023, from https://vneconomy.vn/hoa-phat-tiep-tuc-
bao-lo-tang-manh-gan-2-000-ty-dong-trong-quy-4-2022.htm.
41