Distributed Cooperative Control And Communication For Multiagent Systems Dong Yue instant download
Distributed Cooperative Control And Communication For Multiagent Systems Dong Yue instant download
https://ebookbell.com/product/distributed-cooperative-control-
and-communication-for-multiagent-systems-dong-yue-47434780
https://ebookbell.com/product/distributed-consensus-in-multivehicle-
cooperative-control-theory-and-applications-1st-edition-wei-ren-
phd-2250588
https://ebookbell.com/product/cooperative-control-of-multiagent-
systems-distributedobserver-and-distributedinternalmodel-approaches-
he-cai-47364880
https://ebookbell.com/product/distributed-cooperative-control-
emerging-applications-yi-guo-44547760
https://ebookbell.com/product/distributed-cooperative-control-of-
multiagent-systems-yu-wenwu-5700140
Distributed Cooperative Control Emerging Applications Guo Yi
https://ebookbell.com/product/distributed-cooperative-control-
emerging-applications-guo-yi-6755170
https://ebookbell.com/product/distributed-cooperative-model-
predictive-control-of-networked-systems-yuanyuan-zou-46482846
https://ebookbell.com/product/cooperative-control-of-distributed-
multiagent-systems-jeff-shamma-4643762
https://ebookbell.com/product/distributed-cooperative-laboratories-
networking-instrumentation-and-measurements-1st-edition-ralf-
tanger-4191620
https://ebookbell.com/product/cooperative-and-distributed-intelligent-
computation-in-fog-computing-concepts-architectures-and-frameworks-
hoa-trandang-50577154
Dong Yue · Huaipin Zhang ·
Shengxuan Weng
Distributed
Cooperative Control
and Communication
for Multi-agent
Systems
Distributed Cooperative Control
and Communication for Multi-agent Systems
Dong Yue · Huaipin Zhang · Shengxuan Weng
Distributed Cooperative
Control and Communication
for Multi-agent Systems
Dong Yue Huaipin Zhang
Nanjing University of Posts Nanjing University of Posts
and Telecommunications and Telecommunications
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Shengxuan Weng
Nanjing University of Posts
and Telecommunications
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether
the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse
of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and
transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar
or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication
does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant
protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book
are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or
the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any
errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore 189721,
Singapore
Preface
With the popularization of intelligent devices and the rapid development of commu-
nication technology, modern control systems exhibit two prominent features, namely
structural interactivity and functional complexity. The former roots in the couplings
of systems while the latter represents the complex task to be realized. In this case,
multi-agent systems (MASs) are introduced to address these two issues. In general,
MASs consist of a group of connected autonomous agents integrating distributed
sensing, communication, computing, and control in a networked environment, in
which these agents can cooperate with each other and share information with their
neighbors to accomplish a complex task together. Compared with an individual agent,
MASs have several advantages, such as reliability, adaptivity, robustness, scalability,
low cost of operation and maintenance, etc. Recently, MASs and their concomitant
cooperation problems have received considerable attention in many fields, such as
biology, physics, artificial intelligence, and engineering.
To achieve a desired global goal, two interesting and crucial issues will be consid-
ered in multi-agent cooperation. One is system-level question, which involves how
to coordinate and control such systems or agents; The other is network-level ques-
tion related to how information among agents could be transmitted, especially in an
efficient way since communication resources are often limited. The former question
comes down to cooperative control protocol design while the latter to cooperative
communication scheme design. Thus, these two aspects, which are important hand-
grips to deal with cooperation problems of MASs, will be investigated in this book.
In general, cooperative control aims to drive a group of agents to reach an agreement
on a common quantity of interest. A key issue of cooperative control is how to design
an information flow algorithm which describes the rules of information interaction
between adjacent agents. Depending on the differences of information interaction and
processing unit of data fusion, cooperative control can be classified into three config-
uration modes: centralized, decentralized, and distributed ones. In large-scale MASs,
centralized framework increases communication cost and computing burden while
decentralized scheme lacks the information interaction among agents to achieve
cooperation. Thus, it is preferable to employ distributed cooperative control which
depends only on local interactions among the neighbor agents. This monograph
mainly focuses on the various classes of distributed MASs cooperation problems.
v
vi Preface
vii
viii Contents
3.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
∀ For all
∈
Belong to
Summation
⊗ Kronecker products
∪ Union operator
◦ Compound operator
sup Supremum
inf Infimum
R Set of real numbers
Rn n dimensional real Euclidean space
Rn×m n × m dimensional real matrix space
A Real matrix A
AT Transpose of matrix A
A−1 Inverse of matrix A
λi (A) The ith eigenvalue of matrix A
λmax (A) The maximum eigenvalue of matrix A
λmin (A) The minimum eigenvalue of matrix A
A>0 Symmetric positive definite A
A≥0 Symmetric positive semi-definite A
|x| Absolute value of x
xp p-norm of vector x
Ap Induced p-norm of matrix A
0n×m n × m zero matrix
In n × n identity matrix
xi
Chapter 1
Overview of Multiagent Systems
Cooperation
1.1 Introduction
During the rapid and sustained development of industrial and civilian demand, mod-
ern control systems are becoming more and more open, complex, heterogeneous
and highly distributed. Under this circumstance, it is expected to build new engi-
neering styles to achieve many complex coordination tasks, which is difficult to be
implemented based on individual agent. Multi-agent system (MAS), which imposes
a group of connected autonomous agents operating through distributed sensing, com-
munication, computing, and control in a networked environment to achieve a certain
system goal, is regarded as a promising and effective system architectural to cope
with these coordination problems. In the network of MAS, each agent is described by
a node and the connections among agents are represented by edges. To cooperate with
other agents, each agent needs to share information with its neighbor agents through
the edges so as to reach agree on a common quantity of interest. In comparison
with an individual agent, MASs have some prominent advantages, including strong
robustness and reliability, high scalability and efficiency, manipulability, large-scale
spatial distribution. MASs have attracted considerable research attention from vari-
ous fields, including biology, computer science, robotics and engineering during the
last decade, this is mainly due to the widespread application in scientific comput-
ing [1, 2], distributed artificial intelligence [3, 4], space exploration [5, 6], mobile
robotics [7, 8], power systems [9, 10], search and rescue [11, 12].
In the control design of MASs, the main objective is to make all agents operate
in a cooperative fashion through a control protocol. Here, cooperative refers to a
close relationship among agents, where all agents can achieve a certain common
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 1
D. Yue et al., Distributed Cooperative Control and Communication for Multi-agent
Systems, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6718-0_1
2 1 Overview of Multiagent Systems Cooperation
ative states and outputs of neighborhood are constructed. In [25, 47], adaptive and
asynchronous output containment control of heterogeneous MASs were considered.
The analysis on distributed finite-time attitude containment control for multiple rigid
bodies was presented in [48, 49], which can drive the attitudes of the followers into
the convex hull formed by the one of leaders. Qi et al. [50] proposed a distributed
event-triggered fuzzy bipartite containment controller of nonlinear MASs with input
quantization over a signed digraph, in which a fuzzy observer was designed to esti-
mate unmeasured states.
In the past few decades, the ever-increasing complexity of modern industrial systems
has made it more and more difficult to build the accurate physical models using the
first principles. Even though the physical models of the plants can be obtained, it may
be difficult to use model-based control theory for controller design and performance
evaluation since the models are too complex. With the rapid development of infor-
mation technology, modern industrial processes can easily collect a large number of
measured process data which contain stored historical data and online real-time data.
In the case of failure of model-based control theory, how to use these measurable
data for controller design, state prediction and performance evaluation is an impor-
tant and urgent problem. In order to solve this issue, data-driven control, which can
directly utilize measurable input/output data to design the controller, was introduced
in [51–54]. In what follows, two typical data-driven methods will be utilized to study
the cooperation control problems.
(i) Iterative learning control
Iterative Learning Control (ILC) is an intelligent learning control methodology which
can improve the transient performance of the system in the current iteration by using
the past control experience. It can effectively deal with repetitive control process in
a finite duration and requires only process measurements instead of accurate system
model. Recently, ILC has been extensively applied to study the cooperative control
problems [55–63]. In [55], Ahn and Chen introduced ILC to consider the formation
control problem of MASs with continuous nonlinear dynamics. Then formation-
based ILC were extended to investigate MASs with switching topologies and actuator
faults in [56, 57, 60]. Bu et al. [62] employed the terminal ILC method to discuss
the finite-time consensus problem of nonlinear MASs with unknown dynamics and
output saturation, where data-driven consensus protocols are developed. In [58] and
[59], formation tracking control of second-order and high-order MASs were studied
based on ILC approach. Hua et al. [63] introduced an event-triggered mechanism
into ILC framework to solve the containment control problem of model-free MASs.
4 1 Overview of Multiagent Systems Cooperation
agents which can further reduce data transmission and control updates. Some related
results on single-integrator MASs [84–86] and double-integrator MASs [87, 88] can
be found.
This book investigates the distributed cooperation problems of MASs which mainly
considers two factors that affect cooperation: distributed controller design and suit-
able communication strategy design. Thus distributed cooperation control design
analysis of linear, nonlinear MASs and multiple rigid bodies are the first contribu-
tion of this book. Secondly, the proposed two kinds of communication strategies are
another contribution. The more detailed contributions of this book are summarized
as follows:
is built. Under the event-triggered sampling mechanism, the weights of the critic-
action networks are only updated at the triggering instants. This aperiodic updated
scheme can save computation resource and reduce transmission load compared
with the time-triggered adaptive dynamic programming method.
strained optimal consensus control policies are designed from the HJB equations. In
order to implement the event-triggered adaptive dynamic programming algorithm,
the critic networks and action networks are developed to approximate the value func-
tions and consensus control policies respectively based on the measurable system
data. Under the event-triggered control framework, the weights of the critic networks
and action networks are only updated at the triggering instants which are decided by
the designed adaptive triggered conditions. The Lyapunov method is used to prove
that the local neighbor consensus errors and the weight estimation errors of the critic
networks and action networks are ultimately bounded.
References
17. J. Qin, Q. Ma, Y. Shi, L. Wang, Recent advances in consensus of multi-agent systems: A brief
survey. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 64(6), 4972–4983 (2016)
18. Y. Cao, W. Yu, W. Ren, G. Chen, An overview of recent progress in the study of distributed
multi-agent coordination. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 9(1), 427–438 (2012)
19. Y. Wang, E. Garcia, D. Casbeer, F. Zhang, Cooperative Control of Multi-agent Systems: Theory
and Applications (Wiley, New York, 2017)
20. R.O. Saber, R.M. Murray, Consensus protocols for networks of dynamic agents, in Proceedings
of 2003 America Control Conference, vol. 2 (Piscataway, 2003), pp. 951–956
21. R. Olfati-Saber, R.M. Murray, Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topol-
ogy and time-delays. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49(9), 1520–1533 (2004)
22. C.-Q. Ma, J.-F. Zhang, Necessary and sufficient conditions for consensusability of linear multi-
agent systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 55(5), 1263–1268 (2010)
23. W. Hou, M.Y. Fu, H. Zhang, Consensusability of linear multi-agent systems with time delay.
Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 26(12), 2529–2541 (2016)
24. L. Xu, N. Xiao, L. Xie, Consensusability of discrete-time linear multi-agent systems over
analog fading networks. Automatica 71, 292–299 (2016)
25. Z. Li, W. Ren, X. Liu, L. Xie, Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive
dynamic protocols. Automatica 49(7), 1986–1995 (2013)
26. H. Zhang, D. Yue, X. Yin, S. Hu, C. xia Dou, Finite-time distributed event-triggered consensus
control for multi-agent systems. Inf. Sci. 339, 132–142 (2016)
27. L. Yu, J. Wang, Robust cooperative control for multi-agent systems via distributed output
regulation. Syst. Control Lett. 62(11), 1049–1056 (2013)
28. Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, G. Wen, W. Ren, G. Chen, Designing distributed specified-time consensus
protocols for linear multiagent systems over directed graphs. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
64(7), 2945–2952 (2018)
29. C. Huang, X. Ye, Cooperative output regulation of heterogeneous multi-agent systems: An H∞
criterion. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 59(1), 267–273 (2013)
30. X. Li, Y.C. Soh, L. Xie, F.L. Lewis, Cooperative output regulation of heterogeneous linear
multi-agent networks via H∞ performance allocation. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 64(2),
683–696 (2018)
31. H. Su, M. Chen, X. Wang et al., Semiglobal observer-based leader-following consensus with
input saturation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 61(6), 2842–2850 (2013)
32. Z. Pang, W. Luo, G. Liu, et al., Observer-based incremental predictive control of networked
multi-agent systems with random delays and packet dropouts. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II:
Express Briefs (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2020.2999126
33. Y. Wang, Y. Yuan, J. Liu, Finite-time leader-following output consensus for multi-agent sys-
tems via extended state observer. Automatica (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.
2020.109133
34. W. Dong, Consensus of high-order nonlinear continuous-time systems with uncertainty and
limited communication data rate. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 64(5), 2100–2107 (2018)
35. M. Egerstedt, X. Hu, Formation constrained multi-agent control. IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.
17(6), 947–951 (2001)
36. Y. Liu, Z. Geng, Finite-time formation control for linear multi-agent systems: A motion plan-
ning approach. Syst. Control Lett. 85, 54–60 (2015)
37. K.-K. Oh, H.-S. Ahn, Formation control and network localization via orientation alignment.
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 59(2), 540–545 (2013)
38. D.V. Dimarogonas, K.H. Johansson, Stability analysis for multi-agent systems using the inci-
dence matrix: Quantized communication and formation control. Automatica 46(4), 695–700
(2010)
39. D. Li, S.S. Ge, W. He, G. Ma, L. Xie, Multilayer formation control of multi-agent systems.
Automatica 109, 108558 (2019)
40. M.A. Kamel, X. Yu, Y. Zhang, Formation control and coordination of multiple unmanned
ground vehicles in normal and faulty situations: A review. Ann. Rev. Control 49, 128–144
(2020)
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
Johnson, Caleb, Melville O
Johnson, Lionel H., Wallaceburg O
Johnson, Carby, Ventry O
Johnson, H. A., Dalhousie NB
Johnson, T. Stewart, Tweedside O
Johnson, Daniel, Cumbermere O
Johnson, George, Pefferlaw O
Johnson, C., L’Original O
Johnson, T. W., Ballymote O
Johnson, Anne, Kinlough O
Johnston, S., Clapham Q
Johnston, Joseph, Pelham Union O
Johnston, Robert, Weston O
Johnston, Richard, Dryden O
Johnston, Richard, Thistletown O
Johnston, B. H., Port Carling O
Johnston, John, Farnham Centre Q
Johnston, Samuel, Newcastle NB
Johnstone, Adam, Linton’s, W. O. NB
Johnstone, William, Johnson O
Jollimore, J. W., Mill Cove, W. O. NS
Joncas, P. S., Berthier (en bas) Q
Jones, Cereno D., Weymouth NS
Jones, Maxon, Bloomington O
Jones, C. H., Bromemere Q
Jones, Joseph, Thompson’s Mills NS
Jones, J. M., Stanbridge, East Q
Jones, Merritt, Mount Pleasant, W. O. NB
Jones, Charles, junr., Oxford Mills O
Jones, Chas. K., Bronte O
Jones, Thomas, Sabrevois Q
Jones, D. A., Tecumseth O
Jones, John, Sunderland O
Jones, Alva G., Stony Creek O
Jones, Peter, Cranworth O
Jordan, J. A., Upper Cross Roads, St. Mary’s, W. O. NS
Jordan, M., Leinster O
Jordan, Patrick, Connaught O
Jordine, Ferguson, Newington O
Journeay, Jasper, Weymouth Bridge NS
Judd, Agnes, Stirling O
Judge, John, Mono Road Station O
Jury, Thomas, Napperton O
Jutras, Joseph, East Chester Q
Jutras, H., Somerset Q
ebookbell.com