paper 4 history
paper 4 history
oct/nov 2024 42
oct/nov 2024 43
In January 1919, free elections took place in Germany for the very first time. Ebert’s party won
the largest share of the vote, meaning he was the first President of the Weimar Republic. They
signed the Treaty of Versailles in June 1919, and Ebert signed the Weimar Constitution in
August 1919. The constitution clearly replaced the German president with the Kaiser as head of
state, with re-elections to take place every 7 years. The Reichstag parliament was given
re-elections every 4 years, with proportional representation, proving Germany to develop into
a democratic country.
Answer: March 2024 42
3 (b)
One of the most significant impacts of the Munich Putsch was the shift in Nazi strategy from
violent revolution to legal political methods. Before the putsch, Hitler believed that the Weimar
Republic could be overthrown through force, inspired by Mussolini’s successful March on
Rome in 1922. However, the failure of the putsch, the lack of military support, and the swift
suppression by the authorities demonstrated that a direct coup was impossible. During his
trial, Hitler used the courtroom as a propaganda platform, realizing that public opinion and
institutional control were more powerful tools than outright rebellion. After his release from
prison, he focused on gaining power through elections, reorganizing the Nazi Party to function
as a legitimate political movement. This strategic shift was the most important long-term
consequence of the putsch, as it allowed the Nazis to exploit democracy to destroy democracy,
culminating in Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor in 1933.
Another major impact was the effect of the trial and Hitler’s imprisonment on his personal
status and the Nazi Party’s public image. Instead of being dismissed as a failed revolutionary,
Hitler emerged as a nationalist hero in the eyes of many Germans. The trial gave him a
national platform to justify his actions, denounce the Treaty of Versailles, and portray himself
as a patriot fighting against the "traitorous" Weimar government. He received only a lenient
sentence of five years (of which he served just nine months), reinforcing the perception that
right-wing extremism was tolerated more than left-wing threats. While in prison, Hitler wrote
Mein Kampf, outlining his vision for Germany, which later became the ideological foundation
of the Nazi movement. Without the trial and imprisonment, Hitler might have remained a
fringe figure, but instead, he gained unprecedented recognition, which later helped in the Nazi
Party’s electoral rise.
The putsch also had a critical impact on the internal structure and discipline of the Nazi Party.
Before 1923, the Nazis were a relatively disorganized paramilitary group relying on violence
and intimidation. The failure of the putsch forced Hitler to rethink this approach, leading to
the restructuring of the party into a more centralized and disciplined organization. He
established a hierarchical leadership model under his sole authority (Führerprinzip), ensuring
that all party decisions aligned with his vision. The SA (Stormtroopers), though still active,
became more controlled, while the Nazi propaganda machine was strengthened. The creation
of regional branches (Gauleiters) and the use of propaganda transformed the party from a
radical street movement into a formidable political force. This structural reorganization was
vital in enabling the Nazis to expand their support base and dominate German politics in the
1930s.
A final impact of the putsch was the way it contributed to Nazi mythology and the idea of
martyrdom. Despite its failure, the Nazis later framed the putsch as a noble sacrifice for
Germany. The 16 Nazis who died were glorified as martyrs, with annual commemorations and
marches reinforcing the narrative of Nazi struggle and resilience. The event was woven into
Nazi propaganda, fostering a sense of unity and purpose among members. This mythology
helped strengthen loyalty to Hitler, as he was portrayed as a leader who had personally risked
everything for Germany. The Nazi Party used this to maintain its image as a revolutionary
force, even as it pursued power through legal means. Without this carefully cultivated
narrative, the party may have struggled to maintain internal cohesion and ideological
commitment during the years before its electoral success.
Overall, the most important impact of the Munich Putsch was the strategic shift from violent
revolution to legal political maneuvering. While the other effects—Hitler’s rise in status, the
restructuring of the Nazi Party, and the creation of Nazi mythology—were crucial, they all
contributed to this fundamental change in approach. The Nazis’ ability to use democratic
institutions to dismantle democracy itself was a direct consequence of the lessons learned
from 1923. Without the putsch, Hitler may have continued to rely on force, likely leading to
further failures and suppression rather than political dominance.