ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765

ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875

International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,

Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014

An Adaptive Hysteresis Band Current

Controlled Shunt Active Power Filter
Vaddi Ramesh1, B Haritha 2, P Rabeya Sulthana3 M Diveswar Reddy 4

Phd Student, Department of EEE, KL University, Green fields Vaddeswaram, Guntur Dist, Andhra Pradesh, India1

M.Tech Student [Power Electronics], Department of EEE, GVIC Engineering, Madanapalle, Andhra Pradesh, India2,3,4

ABSTRACT:-Solid state control of ac power using thyristors and other semiconductor devices are used extensively in
number of applications such as adjustable speed drives (ASD’s), furnaces, computers power supplies and asynchronous ac–
dc–ac links. These power converters behave as non-linear loads to ac supply system and cause harmonic injection, lower
power-factor, poor voltage regulation, and utilization of ac network. There is a great need to mitigate these harmonic and
reactive current components. Active Power Filters are a viable solution to these problems. In this project work both
simulation and hardware of a single-phase Shunt Active Power Filter was implemented. To eliminate supply current
harmonics, correct supply power-factor, and balance the non-linear/linear loads. A single-phase insulated gate bipolar
transistor based current controlled voltage source inverter with a dc bus capacitor is used as an active filter. To compensate
the generated harmonics and to make the balanced and sinusoidal source currents by the injection of compensation currents.
APF reference current generation by using a simple technique sampling and integration of the one complete power cycle.
This method simplifies the calculation algorithm. Among the available current control methods, Hysteresis Band Current
Control method, ease of implementation with high accuracy and quick response. Conventional hystresis band current
control is limited due to wide variations in switching frequency and its associated effects. An Adaptive hysteresis band
calculator varies the hysteresis band width, HB, according to diref*(t)/dt and Vdc and supply voltage Vs. This controller
ensures least variation in device switching frequency by maintaining the merits of the basic technique.

KEYWORDS: Active Power Filters, Hysteresis Band Current Control method ,Shunt Active Power Filter

I. INTRODUCTION
The use of the modern electronic equipments has changed our lives and has introduced wide variety of loads in the power
systems[1]. This has changed the load characteristics of the electric supply networks, all the electronic loads are “non-
linear” (Current is not proportional to the applied voltage) and this is because of the way they draw the power from the
supply[2]. The Non-linear loads will produce current and voltage components with higher frequencies into the power line.
These higher frequencies of current and voltage components are known as the power harmonics. Even though a single low-
power electronic based appliance, in which a single-phase diode rectifier with a dc link capacitor is used as utility interface,
produces a negligible amount of harmonic current. Three-phase diode or thyristor rectifiers and cycloconverters for industry
applications also generate a large amount of harmonic current[3]-[4]. Voltage distortion or harmonics resulting from current
harmonics produced by power electronic equipment has become a serious problem to be solved in many countries.
“Harmonics are currents and voltages that are continuous multiples of the fundamental frequency of 50 Hz such as 100 Hz
(2nd harmonic) and 250 Hz (5th harmonic)”. Most commonly used non-linear loads are Switch Mode Power Supply
systems found in personal computers. Microwave ovens, laser printers, medical instrumentation systems, stereos,
televisions, Adjustable speed drives, and electronic lighting are also examples of equipments using switch mode power
supplies. Other types of non-linear loads include rectifiers, both controlled and uncontrolled, and phase angle controlled
power supplies.

Copyright to IJAREEIE www.ijareeie.com 8031

 ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875

International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,

Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014

Fig 1 Harmonics

There are two approaches to mitigate the power quality problems. The first approach is called load conditioning,
which ensure that the equipment is made less sensitive to the power disturbances, allowing the operation of equipments
even under significant voltage distortion. The other solution is to install line-conditioning systems that suppress or
counteract the power system disturbances. Power electronic equipment can be designed to provide harmonic free
performance. But in most applications, the economic incentives have not been sufficient to bring about design
improvements[6]. The sinusoidal nature of the power system voltage should be preserved, while protecting components
from added harmonic loadings. The electrical utilities are quickly adopting the philosophy and constraints proposed in
IEEE 519-1992, a recommended practice (one level short of a mandatory standard), limiting the both utility voltage and
end-user current distortions. In order to maintain good power quality, various international agencies recommended limits of
harmonic current injection into the utility..The amount of distortion in the voltage or current waveform is quantified by
means of an index called the total harmonic distortion (THD). The THD in current is defined as


Ish 2
THD=  ( I1 )
h 2
* 100%

II. FUNCTIONING OF ACTIVE POWER FILTERS

Fig 2 Single line diagram of active power filter

Copyright to IJAREEIE www.ijareeie.com 8032

 ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875

International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,

Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014

A single phase power supply with 230V, 50Hz, which is connected to a full bridge diode rectifier as the nonlinear load in
this project to produce a distorted source current. Due to the nonlinear characteristic of the diodes, the sinusoidal current
waveform for the supply is distorted. The distorted current is fed into the harmonics isolator to produce the desired
compensated harmonic currents which is the inversed of the original harmonics in the line. The harmonics isolator
algorithms are based on the instantaneous active and reactive theorem in time domain.

III.HYSTERESIS CURRENT CONTROL

The basic implementation of the hysteresis current controller derives the switching signals from the comparison of
the current error with a fixed hysteresis band The operation of the hysteresis current controller is explained by circuit shown
in fig 3 the load current components ia , ib are sensed and compared with the respective command current components iaref,
ibref using two independent hysteresis comparators having hysteresis band H. The output error currents of comparator are
used to active the inverter powers switches. The advantage of this controller lies its simplicity and its providing of excellent
dynamic performance. Thus, it has most extensively used. On the other hand, the disadvantage is that the switching
frequency varies during fundamental period, resulting in irregular operation of the inverter. As a result the switching losses
are increased.

Fig 3Block diagram of the Hysteresis Current control

APF eliminates system harmonics through injecting a current to the system that is equal to the load harmonic
current; therefore the system side will almost have no harmonic current remaining. Since the load harmonics to be
compensated may be very complex and changing rapidly and randomly, APF has to respond quickly and work with high
control accuracy in current tracking. Moreover in order to keep high safety and efficiency in APF operation, the required
voltage source inverter (VSI) switching frequency and dc source voltage, which are highly relevant to the current tracking
method used should as low as possible[1]-[2]. It is clear that APF output current control technique is the key issue of its
performance and efficiency.. However switching frequency might fluctuate greatly .The latter can realize constant
switching frequency but with relatively lower accuracy and response speed.Active filters produce a nearly sinusoidal supply
current by measuring the harmonic currents and then injecting them back into the power system with a 180° phase shift. A
controlled current inverter is required to generate this compensating current. Hysteresis current control is a method of
controlling a voltage source inverter so that an output current is generated which follows a reference current waveform[3]-
[4]. This method controls the switches in an inverter asynchronously to ramp the current through an inductor up and down
so that it tracks a reference current signal. Hysteresis current control is the easiest control method to implement.
A hysteresis current controller is implemented with a closed loop control system. An error signal, e(t) is used to
control the switches in an inverter. This error is the difference between the desired current, Iref (t) , and the current being
injected by the inverter, Iactual(t).When the error reaches an upper limit, the transistors are switched to force the current down.
When the error reaches a lower limit the current is forced to increase. The range of the error signal directly controls the
amount of ripple in the output current from the inverter and this is called the Hysteresis Band. The Hysteresis limits relate
directly to an offset from the reference signal and are referred to as the Lower Hysteresis Limit and the Upper Hysteresis
Limit. The current is forced to stay within these limits even while the reference current is changing.
Copyright to IJAREEIE www.ijareeie.com 8033
 ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875

International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,

Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014

Fig 4 Hysteresis PWM Current Control and Switching logic.

The turn-on and turn-off conditions for the inverter switches is
 Upper switch Off: (iact – iref) > HB.
 Lower switch Off: (iact – iref) < -HB.
The width of the hysteresis band determines the switching frequency of the inverter. As the band - width narrows the
switching frequency increases. A suitable bandwidth should be selected in accordance with the switching capability of the
inverter[6]. The fixed hysteresis band is very simple and easy to implement. This high frequency produces a great stress for
the switches and induces important switching losses. When the inductance is too large the maximum rate of change of
current will be too low to track the steep current changes that occur with high frequencies. The small inductances used
mean that the rates of change of current will be high. High switching frequencies result and this causes large losses in the
semiconductor switches[5]. This also leads to increased levels of electromagnetic interference and requires very high-speed
comparisons of the actual current against the hysteresis limits.
3.1 Adaptive hysteresis band calculator
A novel adaptive-hysteresis (nearly) constant-frequency current control technique for single-phase switchmode rectifiers
operating in continuous conduction mode is presented. It is based on cycle-by-cycle hysteresis calculator, which generates
the hysteresis window that will keep the switching frequency in a very narrow band centered around programmed average
value.

Fig 5 Variable hysteresis band Current controller

Adaptive hysteresis band calculator varies the hysteresis band width, HB, according to diref*(t)/dt and Vdc and
supply voltage Vs. The analytical derivation is given below indicates that by variation in HB, switching frequency (fsw),
can be maintained nearly constant. When the current in the injection inductor tries to leave the hysteresis band appropriate
switch is turned ON or OFF to force the ramping of the current within the hysteresis band.

Copyright to IJAREEIE www.ijareeie.com 8034

 ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875

International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,

Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014

Fig 6 single phase VSI with HCC and current and voltage waveforms
In the intervals t1 and t2 ia+ and ia- can be expressed as The slope of the reference current, DC link voltage, the source
voltage and the inductance value are definite in this equation. By choosing an arbitrary switching frequency, so that fsw
remains constant.
The turn-on and turn-off conditions for the inverter switches is
 Upper switch ON and Lower switch OFF: (i*ref - iactual)  HB.
 Upper switch OFF and Lower switch ON: (i*ref - iactual)  HB.

IV. SIMULATION RESULTS

Fig 7.Simulink model of the system with conventional Hysteresis controller

Fig 8Simulink model for reference current generator

Fig 9simulink model for inverter switching pulses

Copyright to IJAREEIE www.ijareeie.com 8035
 ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875

International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,

Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014

4.2 USING ADAPTIVE HYSTERESIS CONTROLLER

The simulink model of the system used for simulating the adaptive Hysteresis control is shown in the Fig 6 and simulink
models of three main subsystems used for simulating reference current calculator adaptive hysteresis band calculator and
inverter switching pulses are shown in Fig 7, Fig8 and Fig9 respectively. The solver used is ode23tb (stiff/TR-BDF2) and
simulated in discrete-time domain with the system sampling time at 1us. The system parameters are shown in Table 1.

Fig10:simulink model of the system with Adaptive hysteresis band controller

(i) Reference Current Control Algorithm Implementation:

The reference current control algorithm generates compensation currents for the single-phase shunt active power filter
based on the sampling and integration of one complete power cycle. The PLL is used to generate the unit amplitude pure
sin wave, multiplier gives the product of unit sin wave and the load current. The output of the multiplier is given to the
resettable Integrator. The result is integrated for cycle duration and the value of integration is noted by a sample & hold
mechanism at the end of cycle period. After sampling the integrator is reset and allowed to perform the integration for the
next period. To reset the resettable integrator and sample & hold pulses aregenerated by using the Zero crossing detectors
are shown in Fig 10.. The output of the multiplier is fundamental active component of the load current. This is subtracted
from the load current to get the compensating current.

Fig 11: Simulink model for reference current generator.

The D.C voltage across the capacitor is sensed and compared with reference it produces the error voltage. The
error voltage is given to the proportional plus integral controller (PI) to get the peak value of charging current Isc, required
to be absorbed by APF to charge the capacitor. The result is multiplied by unit sin wave to get the Instantaneous current[9].
By adding the instantaneous current and compensating current we will get the reference current.
(ii) Adaptive Hysteresis Band Implementation:
Adaptive hysteresis band calculator varies the hysteresis band width, HB, according to slope of the reference
current diref*(t)/dt , Vdc and supply voltage Vs to maintain the switching frequency fsw nearly constant. The simulink model
was developed by using following equation

Copyright to IJAREEIE www.ijareeie.com 8036

 ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875

International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,

Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014

di *
Where m  (slope of the reference current)
dt

Fig 12 Simulink model for adaptive hysteresis band calculator.

(iii) Inverter Switching Logic Implementation:

The switching logic for the inverter IGBT Bridge by using S-R flip-flop as shown in the Fig 7.7.The turn-on and
turn-off conditions for the inverter switches is

Fig 13 simulink model for inverter switching pulses

 Upper switch ON and Lower switch OFF: (i*ref - iactual)  HB.
 Upper switch OFF and Lower switch ON: (i*ref - iactual)  HB.
To implement the above conditions S-R flip-flop was used. These generated pulses are applied to the switching devices of
the Voltage Source Inverter.

V. MATLAB SIMULINK RESULTSAND DISCUSSIONS

The system shown in fig14 is simulated for 1sec. Results are shown from 0.1 to 0.3 sec.The results of
test systems are shown below
5.1 WITHOUT CONTROLLER

Fig 14:Source Current (Load current)

Fig 16 Harmonic spectrum of source current(THD 24.47%)

We can observe that without using any controller the THD on source side has 24.47%

Copyright to IJAREEIE www.ijareeie.com 8037

 ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875

International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,

Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014

5.2 RESULTS OF ACTIVE POWER FILTER WITH HYSTERESIS CONTROLLER

The system shown in fig 13 is simulated for 1sec. Results are shown from 0.1 to 0.3 sec. Fig 14, Fig 15and Fig 16
shows source current, load current and inverter injecting currents (actual current measured) respectively. Fig 17 and Fig 18
shows DC bus voltage and Source voltage & currents respectively. Fig19 and Fig 20 shows harmonic spectrums of source
and load currents[8]. We can observe that THD on source side has reduced from 24.47% to 5.32%. Thus results show APF
with conventional control effectively compensates both harmonic and reactive powers.

Fig 17 Source current

Fig 19 Inverter injecting current

Fig 20Source voltage and currents

Fig 21 harmonic spectrum of load current (THD 26.90%)

Fig 22 Harmonic spectrum of source current (THD 5.32%)

Copyright to IJAREEIE www.ijareeie.com 8038

 ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875

International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,

Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014

5.3 RESULTS OF POWER FILTER WITH ADAPTIVE HYSTERESIS CONTROLLER

Test system shown in Fig 15 is simulated for 1 sec. Results are shown from 0.1 to 0.3 sec. Fig 24, Fig 25, Fig 26
and Fig 27 shows source current, load current, harmonic injecting current and DC bus voltages respectively. Fig 19 shows
the source voltage and source current; clearly indicate that source current is in phase with the supply voltage. Fig 16 and
Fig 17shows the harmonic spectrums of the load current and source current respectively. Fig 16 shows the inverter
switching frequency[10]. We can observe that THD on source side has reduced from 24.47% to 4.21%. Thus results show
APF with adaptive hysteresis control effectively compensates both harmonic and reactive powers. The switching frequency
is also maintained nearly constant and also maintaining the merits of the conventional technique.

Fig 24 Source current

Fig26 Inverter injecting current

Fig 27Source voltage and source current

Fig 28 Harmonic spectrum of load current (THD 26.48%)

Fig 29 Harmonic spectrum of source current (THD 4.21%)

VI .CONCLUSION
From the simulation responses, it is evident that the reference current generator and the adaptive hysteresis band
current controller are performed satisfactorily. This work involves a simple technique based on sampling and integration of
the normalized power signal over one power cycle period to determine the peak fundamental active component of the load
current. The adaptive hysteresis band calculator dynamically adjusts the hysteresis bandwidth with the objective of constant
device switching frequency. The source current waveform is in phase with the utility voltage and free from harmonic
components. The single-phase shunt active power filter system has been implemented by using analog circuits. The
Copyright to IJAREEIE www.ijareeie.com 8039
 ISSN (Print) : 2320 – 3765
ISSN (Online): 2278 – 8875

International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical,

Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014

reference current generator performed satisfactorily. In the open loop, Adaptive hysteresis band current controller is
performed satisfactorily. The pulses are generated, isolated and amplified.
6.1 FUTURE SCOPE OF WORK
Neural network or fuzzy logic based controllers can be incorporated for rating reduction and better response of the
active filtering system.By limiting the high starting current of the filter and by implementing the precise blanking period
(dead time) single-phase shunt active power filter system can be implemented perfectly. The active filtering system can also
be implemented for three phase supply system configurations.

REFERENCES
[1]. Akagi,H., “Active Harmonic Filters,” Proc.Of IEEE, Vol.93, No 12, pp.2128-2141., Dec 2005.
[2]. Akagi, H., "New Trends In Active Filters For Improving Power Quality," Proceedings Of International Conference on Power Electronics,
Drives and Energy Systems for Industrial Growth Vol. 1, pp. 417 - 425, January 1996
[3]. Hsu, C.Y.; Wu, H.Y. "New Single-Phase Active Power Filter With Reduced Energy-Storage Capacity," IEEE Proceedings- Electric Power
Applications, Vol 143, pp.25 - 30, January 1996.
[4]. You , Xiaojie; Li ,Yongdong "A Shunt Active Power Filter Using Dead-Beat Current Control, " proc. Of IEEE 2002 28th Annual Conference
of the Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 1, pp. 633 - 637, November 2002.
[5]. Meo, S.; Perfetto, A "Comparison of different control techniques for active filter applications," Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International
Caracas Conference on Devices, Circuits and Systems, P016-1 - P016-6, April 2002.
[6]. Buso, S. et. al. “A Dead-Beat Adaptive Hysteresis Current Control, ” IEEE transaction on Industry Appliances, Vol. 36, pp.1174-1180, July-
Aug. 2000
[7]. Bose, B., K., "An Adaptive Hysteresis-Band Current Control Technique of a Voltage-Fed PWM Inverter for Machine Drive System,"IEEE
Transactions On Industrial Electronics, Vol. 31, No. 5,pp 402-408, October 1990.
[8]. Simone Buso, Luigi Malesani and Paolo Mattavelli “Comparison of Current Control Techniques for Active Filter Applications” IEEE
Transcations on industrial electronics , vol 45, no. 5, October 1998.
[9]. B.Chitti Babu and Bathula Vasantha Reddy “An Improved Dynamic Response of Voltage Source Inverter using Novel Hysteresis Dead Band
Current Controller” 18th annual symposium on emerging needs in computing, communication, signals and power-2009, 29th august , 2009.
[10]. Mirjana Milo·sevic “Hysteresis Current Control in Three-Phase Voltage Source Inverter”

Copyright to IJAREEIE www.ijareeie.com 8040