Team Project Syllabus 2025
Team Project Syllabus 2025
This syllabus gives you the flexibility to design a course that will interest, challenge and engage your learners.
Where appropriate you are responsible for selecting topics, resources and examples to support your learners’
study. These should be appropriate for the learners’ age, cultural background and learning context as well as
complying with your school policies and local legal requirements.
Cambridge IGCSE Global Perspectives gives learners the opportunity to develop important skills while
exploring significant global topics and issues within these topics. The topics give learners a stimulating context
in which to develop skills and these skills are assessed in this syllabus. Knowledge of content is not assessed
in this syllabus.
Topics
The topics enable students to develop skills, explore global issues and consider different perspectives on these
issues. Students and their teachers must choose topics from the following list.
Topic list
Arts in society Law and criminality
Change in culture and communities Media and communication
Climate change, energy and resources Migration and urbanisation
Conflict and peace Political power and action
Development, trade and aid Poverty and inequality
Digital world Social identity and inclusion
Education for all Sport and recreation
Employment Technology, industry and innovation
Environment, pollution and conservation Transport, travel and tourism
Globalisation Values and beliefs
Health and wellbeing Water, food and agriculture
The topic list is for all components. The topics in the list are intentionally broad. Students with their teachers
choose topics that are most relevant to them. Students are not expected to have experience of each topic.
Choosing topics
Teachers should look at several topics during the course to help develop their students’ skills. The intention is
to give as much scope and encouragement as possible for students to discuss and agree with their teachers
their own paths of enquiry into the complex world in which they live.
How to drive sustainable change is part of this complex world. Sustainability is a global issue and any of the
topics can be considered with a focus on sustainability. The syllabus is designed to give students and teachers
flexibility and encouragement to think about sustainability if they choose to.
The following terms are used in this syllabus. Within the context of this syllabus their meanings are as follows.
Skills
This syllabus enables students to develop the skills of research, analysis and evaluation, reflection,
communication and collaboration by exploring global issues within the topics.
As part of their development, students should learn to engage with relevant material. This material should
be contrasting in nature, including in its breadth and depth. The types of evidence that students use should
encourage them to become actively involved in considering issues from different perspectives. These types of
evidence might include for example, articles from the media, data sets and personal testimony.
In working with these materials, students should consider research, evidence and argument. Within the context
of this syllabus the meanings of these terms are as follows.
Research – the systematic study of a global issue to find evidence and develop understanding.
Evidence – information about a global issue that helps to develop understanding or prove that something is
true or false.
Argument – a series of statements containing reasons and evidence which support a claim about a global
issue.
Candidates work in teams of two to five members to design and carry out a collaborative project.
In the Team Project, candidates are assessed on the skills of research, analysis, evaluation, reflection,
communication and collaboration.
Each individual candidate also produces a Reflective Paper, in which they reflect on the whole project and their
experiences and learning, and evaluate their teamwork and the action taken.
Team Element
The Explanation of Research and Planning: 10 marks
Each team produces one Explanation of Research and Planning of 300–400 words. This is the team’s strategic
and working document which is added to over time. Typically, this document is produced in three stages.
The team completes the Explanation of Research and Planning with this information.
The team completes the Explanation of Research and Planning with this information.
When the team has completed the project, the Explanation of Research and Planning should:
• identify and explain any changes that had to be made.
All members of the team must be awarded the same mark for the Explanation of Research and Planning.
If the word limit is exceeded, the teacher must not award marks beyond the first 400 words of the Explanation
of Research and Planning.
Evidence of Action can take any appropriate form such as posters, leaflets, web pages, videos (10 minutes
maximum), presentations or photographs of an event.
The Evidence of Action is something that has been produced during the action. Evidence of Action should not
include evidence of research or initial meetings to discuss the project.
All members of the team must be awarded the same mark for the Evidence of Action.
If a team submits a video, the teacher must not award marks beyond the first 10 minutes.
All members of the team are awarded the same team mark for Collaboration. All individual members of the
team are also awarded an individual mark for Collaboration. Individual collaboration marks may vary within the
team.
Collaboration marks are awarded by the teacher based on observation throughout the project.
Personal Element
Reflective Paper: 45 marks
Each candidate submits an individual Reflective Paper of 750–1000 words, excluding citations and bibliography
or reference list. The Reflective Paper must not exceed 1000 words.
The Reflective Paper is written in continuous text. It should be structured and easy to follow. The candidate may
use sub-headings for clarity. When appropriate the candidate should use the first person (‘I’ and ‘me’).
Candidates should:
• present a summary of their own research findings and how these were or were not used in the Team
Project
• reflect on their own learning from the whole experience of the Team Project, including their learning about
the issue and teamwork and what they learned about themselves
• evaluate how effective the action they carried out was and how effectively they worked with their team.
If the word limit is exceeded, teachers must not award marks beyond the first 1000 words of the Reflective
Paper.