Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials Toxicity Andrea Hartwig Christoph Van Thriel Instant Download
Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials Toxicity Andrea Hartwig Christoph Van Thriel Instant Download
https://ebookbell.com/product/risk-assessment-of-nanomaterials-
toxicity-andrea-hartwig-christoph-van-thriel-54691834
https://ebookbell.com/product/advances-in-toxicology-and-risk-
assessment-of-nanomaterials-and-emerging-contaminants-lianghong-guo-
mortimer-40673170
https://ebookbell.com/product/risk-assessment-of-power-systems-models-
methods-and-applications-ieee-press-series-on-power-engineering-1st-
edition-wenyuan-li-2121130
https://ebookbell.com/product/risk-assessment-of-chemicals-an-
introduction-2nd-edition-cj-van-leeuwen-2335654
https://ebookbell.com/product/risk-assessment-of-phytochemicals-in-
food-novel-approaches-forschungsberichte-dfg-1st-edition-deutsche-
forschungsgemeinschaft-dfg-2433070
Risk Assessment Of Storms In Coastal Zones Case Studies From Cartagena
Colombia And Cadiz Spain 1st Edition Nelson Rangelbuitrago
https://ebookbell.com/product/risk-assessment-of-storms-in-coastal-
zones-case-studies-from-cartagena-colombia-and-cadiz-spain-1st-
edition-nelson-rangelbuitrago-5054264
https://ebookbell.com/product/risk-assessment-of-vibrio-vulnificus-in-
raw-oysters-first-edition-world-health-organization-1876148
https://ebookbell.com/product/risk-assessment-of-novel-coronavirus-
covid19-outbreaks-outside-china-pter-boldog-10852260
https://ebookbell.com/product/forensic-assessment-of-violence-risk-a-
guide-for-risk-assessment-and-risk-management-mary-alice-
conroy-4304570
https://ebookbell.com/product/health-risk-assessment-of-environmental-
chemicals-preemptive-and-integrated-approaches-masami-ishido-52463122
Special Issue Reprint
Risk Assessment
of Nanomaterials Toxicity
Edited by
Andrea Hartwig and Christoph van Thriel
www.mdpi.com/journal/nanomaterials
Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials
Toxicity
Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials
Toxicity
Editors
Andrea Hartwig
Christoph van Thriel
MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin
Editors
Andrea Hartwig Christoph van Thriel
Karlsruhe Institute of TU Dortmund
Technology (KIT) Germany
Germany
Editorial Office
MDPI
St. Alban-Anlage 66
4052 Basel, Switzerland
This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal
Nanomaterials (ISSN 2079-4991) (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/nanomaterials/
special issues/Risk Assessment Nano).
For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as
indicated below:
LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Volume Number,
Page Range.
© 2023 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative
Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon
published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum
dissemination and a wider impact of our publications.
The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons
license CC BY-NC-ND.
Contents
Elisabeth Elje, Espen Mariussen, Erin McFadden, Maria Dusinska and Elise Rundén-Pran
Different Sensitivity of Advanced Bronchial and Alveolar Mono- and Coculture Models for
Hazard Assessment of Nanomaterials
Reprinted from: Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 407, doi:10.3390/nano13030407 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Paul Schumacher, Franziska Fischer, Joachim Sann, Dirk Walter and Andrea Hartwig
Impact of Nano- and Micro-Sized Chromium(III) Particles on Cytotoxicity and Gene Expression
Profiles Related to Genomic Stability in Human Keratinocytes and Alveolar Epithelial Cells
Reprinted from: Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1294, doi:10.3390/nano12081294 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Otto Creutzenberg, Helena Oliveira, Lucian Farcal, Dirk Schaudien, Ana Mendes,
Ana Catarina Menezes, et al.
PLATOX: Integrated In Vitro/In Vivo Approach for Screening of Adverse Lung Effects of
Graphene-Related 2D Nanomaterials
Reprinted from: Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1254, doi:10.3390/nano12081254 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
Linda Elberskirch, Adriana Sofranko, Julia Liebing, Norbert Riefler, Kunigunde Binder,
Christian Bonatto Minella, et al.
How Structured Metadata Acquisition Contributes to the Reproducibility of Nanosafety
Studies: Evaluation by a Round-Robin Test
Reprinted from: Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1053, doi:10.3390/nano12071053 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
Harald F. Krug
Collection of Controlled Nanosafety Data—The CoCoN-Database, a Tool to Assess
Nanomaterial Hazard
Reprinted from: Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 441, doi:10.3390/nano12030441 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
Sarah May, Cordula Hirsch, Alexandra Rippl, Alexander Bürkle and Peter Wick
Assessing Genotoxicity of Ten Different Engineered Nanomaterials by the Novel
Semi-Automated FADU Assay and the Alkaline Comet Assay
Reprinted from: Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 220, doi:10.3390/nano12020220 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
v
Johanna Wall, Didem Ag Seleci, Feranika Schworm, Ronja Neuberger, Martin Link,
Matthias Hufnagel, et al.
Comparison of Metal-Based Nanoparticles and Nanowires: Solubility, Reactivity,
Bioavailability and Cellular Toxicity
Reprinted from: Nanomaterials 2021, 12, 147, doi:10.3390/nano12010147 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
vi
nanomaterials
Editorial
Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials Toxicity
Andrea Hartwig 1 and Christoph van Thriel 2, *
1 Department of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, Institute of Applied Biosciences (IAB), Karlsruhe Institute of
Technology (KIT), Gebäude 50.41 (AVG), Adenauerring 20a, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany;
[email protected]
2 Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Research Group Neurotoxicology
and Chemosensation, Department of Toxicology, TU Dortmund, Ardey Str. 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany
* Correspondence: [email protected]
The increasing use of nanomaterials in almost every area of our daily life renders
toxicological risk assessment a major requirement for their safe handling. Thus, risk as-
sessment strategies ensuring the health of individuals exposed to these types of materials
must be adopted and continuously reviewed. Major challenges include the enormous
amount of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) used in workplaces [1], the limited capacity
for testing ENMs in long-term animal inhalation studies [2], and the political and soci-
etal efforts to reduce animal experiments according to the 3R principles [3]. Against this
background, much attention has been paid to grouping of nanomaterials, mainly based
on their physicochemical properties and their toxicity in various in vitro models. These
new approach methodologies (NAMs) include a detailed characterization of the respective
materials in physiologically relevant media, but also more realistic exposure systems, such
as co-cultures, at the air–liquid interface, combined with comprehensive cellular inves-
tigations providing quite detailed toxicological profiles. These NAM-based approaches
have been recently reviewed by the U.S. Federal Agencies and the authors concluded
that “ . . . two key issues in the usage of NAMs, namely dosimetry and interference/bias
controls, . . . ” are crucial aspects in ongoing validation processes [4]. In workplaces where
inhalation is the major route of exposure, potential toxicity affecting the lungs needs to be
considered. Here, advanced in vitro models have documented their predictive capacity
for adverse outcomes such as lung fibrosis [5]. Neurotoxicity associated with exposure
to nanomaterials is another growing field of scientific investigation [6] and, here, the use
of nanocarriers for drug delivery provides a special “route of exposure” [7]. We initiated
Citation: Hartwig, A.; van Thriel, C.
this Special Issue to further promote scientific progress in the area of nanosafety and are
Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials
glad to share 13 papers on various topics with the readership of Nanomaterials. This Special
Toxicity. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1512.
Issue highlights recent advances in the mechanisms of nanomaterial toxicity as well as
https://doi.org/10.3390/
approaches for risk assessment, linking nanoparticle characteristics and in vitro toxicity to
nano13091512
in vivo observations for advanced risk assessment. Here, the availability of data and the
Received: 12 April 2023 development of databases are important.
Accepted: 24 April 2023 With three original articles by Murugadoss, Mülhopt et al., Elje et al., and Meindl
Published: 28 April 2023 et al., addressing various aspects, the respiratory tract toxicities of titanium dioxide, carbon
nanotubes, and nanosilver have been described and some assays can be further validated. A
link between in vitro screening and results from in vivo testing for lung effects is provided
by Creutzenberg et al., describing results from the PLATOX project. Focusing on the aspect
Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
of data availability and reproducibility, Krug describes the development of the CoCoN-
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Database, while Elberskirch et al. describe the results of a round-robin test that includes
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
data science tools to increase comparability among different labs. Another relevant and
conditions of the Creative Commons
important aspect is addressed by de Souza Castro et al., comparing 2D and 3D cell culture
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// models of bone mineralization. Here, the 3D model showed improved induction of bone
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ osteointegration by nanoparticles. Mechanisms related to the possible genotoxicity of
4.0/). ENM are described in the papers by Schumacher et al., May et al., and Murugadoss, with
Godderis et al. also addressing the crucial aspect of realistic exposure scenarios in vitro.
These papers are also relevant to the key issue of dosimetry, as described by Petersen
et al. [4]. The paper by Wall et al. provides new insight into the physico-chemical properties
of particulate and fibrous nanomaterials that can modulate their toxicity. Finally, the review
by Ruijter et al. highlights various aspects of how in vitro methods can be incorporated
into the Safe-by-Design concept that is expected to foster the development of safe ENMs
before they enter the market.
Author Contributions: Writing—original draft preparation, C.v.T.; writing—review and editing, A.H.
and C.v.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Schulte, P.A.; Kuempel, E.D.; Drew, N.M. Characterizing Risk Assessments for the Development of Occupational Exposure Limits
for Engineered Nanomaterials. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018, 95, 207–219. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Landsiedel, R.; Ma-Hock, L.; Hofmann, T.; Wiemann, M.; Strauss, V.; Treumann, S.; Wohlleben, W.; Groters, S.; Wiench, K.; van
Ravenzwaay, B.; et al. Application of Short-Term Inhalation Studies to Assess the Inhalation Toxicity of Nanomaterials. Part. Fibre
Toxicol. 2014, 11, 16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Caloni, F.; De Angelis, I.; Hartung, T. Replacement of Animal Testing by Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment
(IATA): A Call for in Vivitrosi. Arch. Toxicol. 2022, 96, 1935–1950. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Petersen, E.J.; Ceger, P.; Allen, D.G.; Coyle, J.; Derk, R.; Garcia-Reyero, N.; Gordon, J.; Kleinstreuer, N.C.; Matheson, J.; McShan,
D.; et al. U.S. Federal Agency Interests and Key Considerations for New Approach Methodologies for Nanomaterials. ALTEX
2022, 39, 183–206. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Barosova, H.; Maione, A.G.; Septiadi, D.; Sharma, M.; Haeni, L.; Balog, S.; O’Connell, O.; Jackson, G.R.; Brown, D.; Clippinger,
A.J.; et al. Use of EpiAlveolar Lung Model to Predict Fibrotic Potential of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Nano. 2020, 14,
3941–3956. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Boyes, W.K.; van Thriel, C. Neurotoxicology of Nanomaterials. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2020, 33, 1121–1144. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Mulvihill, J.J.; Cunnane, E.M.; Ross, A.M.; Duskey, J.T.; Tosi, G.; Grabrucker, A.M. Drug Delivery across the Blood-Brain Barrier:
Recent Advances in the Use of Nanocarriers. Nanomedicine 2020, 15, 205–214. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
2
nanomaterials
Article
Assessment of Carbon Nanotubes on Barrier Function, Ciliary
Beating Frequency and Cytokine Release in In Vitro Models of
the Respiratory Tract
Claudia Meindl 1 , Markus Absenger-Novak 1 , Ramona Jeitler 2 , Eva Roblegg 2 and Eleonore Fröhlich 1, *
1 Center for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, Stiftingtalstr. 24, 8010 Graz, Austria
2 Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz 1, 8010 Graz, Austria
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +43-31638573011
Abstract: The exposure to inhaled carbon nanotubes (CNT) may have adverse effects on workers
upon chronic exposure. In order to assess the toxicity of inhaled nanoparticles in a physiologically
relevant manner, an air–liquid interface culture of mono and cocultures of respiratory cells and
assessment in reconstructed bronchial and alveolar tissues was used. The effect of CNT4003 reference
particles applied in simulated lung fluid was studied in bronchial (Calu-3 cells, EpiAirway™ and
MucilAir™ tissues) and alveolar (A549 +/−THP-1 and EpiAlveolar™ +/−THP-1) models. Cyto-
toxicity, transepithelial electrical resistance, interleukin 6 and 8 secretion, mucociliary clearance and
ciliary beating frequency were used as readout parameters. With the exception of increased secretion
of interleukin 6 in the EpiAlveolar™ tissues, no adverse effects of CNT4003 particles, applied at
doses corresponding to the maximum estimated lifetime exposure of workers, in the bronchial and
alveolar models were noted, suggesting no marked differences between the models. Since the doses
for whole-life exposure were applied over a shorter time, it is not clear if the interleukin 6 increase in
the EpiAlveolar™ tissues has physiological relevance.
Citation: Meindl, C.; Keywords: carbon nanotubes; toxicity; in vitro models; respiratory tract; bronchial epithelium;
Absenger-Novak, M.; Jeitler, R.;
alveolar epithelium; ciliary beating frequency
Roblegg, E.; Fröhlich, E. Assessment
of Carbon Nanotubes on Barrier
Function, Ciliary Beating Frequency
and Cytokine Release in In Vitro
1. Introduction
Models of the Respiratory Tract.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682. https:// Nanoparticles are used in industry, consumer products, health care and medicine, but
doi.org/10.3390/nano13040682 the safety of some particles is still a matter of discussion [1]. One particle type with unclear
safety is carbon nanotubes (CNTs). CNTs have been evaluated for cytotoxicity, genotoxicity,
Academic Editors: Andrea Hartwig
inflammatory potential and carcinogenicity with variable results [2]. The absorption of
and Christoph Van Thriel
CNTs through epithelial barriers was found to be low. Among all barriers, the respiratory
Received: 21 December 2022 barrier is the less protected and most permeable. The lung consists of the conducting and
Revised: 31 January 2023 the respiratory airways, which have different protection mechanisms and require different
Accepted: 6 February 2023 models for toxicity testing in vitro [3].
Published: 9 February 2023 Reported cytotoxicity of multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs) varied from 5 ng/mL to
10 mg/mL and based on a systematic review, A549 and HUVEC were the most appropriate
cells for comparison among research groups [4]. The differences in cytotoxicity by a factor
of 106 are thought to be due not only to differences in cells, assays, exposure conditions
Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
and sample preparation but also to different production of the MWCNTs [4]. To enable
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
better comparison of the results, the use of standardized nanoparticles is suggested. Spon-
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
sored by several European Union Joint programs, European Commission’s Directorate
conditions of the Creative Commons
General Joint Research Centre (JRC) has established the JRC Nanomaterials Repository
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
of industrially manufactured nanomaterials with the aim of providing the scientific and
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ regulatory communities with nanomaterials for testing [5]. Standard Operation Procedures
4.0/). for the dispersion of titanium dioxide, silicon dioxide and MWCNTs in 0.05% bovine
serum albumin (BSA) are available due to the NANOGENOTOX European joint action to
exclude differences in the preparation of particle suspensions [6]. The CNT4003 particles,
formerly termed NM-403, belong to the thin and short MCNTs with reported primary
sizes of 12 nm diameter and 443 nm length. They were chosen for this study because
measurements of CNT manufacturing workplaces report sizes of highest exposure between
10 and 100 nm [7–9], whereas the thicker and longer CNTs (e.g., 80 nm × 3.7 μm) form
particles with aerodynamic size of 260–381 nm [10]. No decrease in viability was observed
at 45.7 μg/cm2 NM-403 for A549 alveolar epithelial cells in conventional testing [11].
Air–liquid interface culture (ALI), where cells grow on transwell membranes and are
exposed to medium with nutrients only from the basal side and the apical parts face the air,
is the physiologically relevant culture for respiratory cells. Using this technique, Calu-3
cells, established models for the bronchial epithelium, produce mucus and A549 as models
for the alveolar epithelium surfactant [12,13]. Calu-3 cells also form epithelial barriers
of sufficient tightness identified by transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) values of
>300 Ω × cm2 . The limitation of Calu-3 cells is that effects of toxicants on ciliary function,
the important clearance mechanism of the upper airways, cannot be assessed because the
cells form only immature and not motile cilia [14]. Reconstructed tissues prepared from
human bronchial epithelial cells, EpiAirway™ from MatTek Cooperation and MucilAir™
from Epithelix Sárl, on the other hand, possess cilia and, therefore, allow the assessment
of this relevant protection system of the lung. The main limitation of A549 cells, which
are routinely used in respiratory toxicity testing, is the fact that despite expression of tight
junction proteins, they do not form a functional epithelial barrier, which corresponds to
the generally low TEER values in the range of 20–60 Ω × cm2 [15,16]. EpiAlveolar™ from
MatTek is composed of alveolar epithelial cells, fibroblasts and endothelial cells and enables
assessment of alveolar barrier function. EpiAlveolar™ enriched with THP-1 macrophages
are also available for more realistic testing of the alveolar barrier [17].
To mimic inhalation of MWCNTs, some researchers have used the VITROCELL
Cloud system [17–19]. According to the producer, 200 μL of nebulization volume are
recommended for the 12-well exposure chambers (https://www.vitrocell.com/inhalation-
toxicology/exposure-systems/vitrocell-cloud-system/vitrocell-cloud-alpha-6 accessed
on 2 May 2021), indicating that each well of a 12-well plate will receive ~17 μL of saline
together with the particles. This solution differs in volume and composition from the lung
lining fluid in the lung. The surface of the lung is covered by a dipalmitoyl-glycero-3-
phosphocholine (DPPC)-rich lung lining fluid of 70–300 nm thickness [20]. The presence
of DPPC is important because nanoparticles in contact with biological fluids will absorb
biomolecules, proteins and lipids onto their surface [21]. This so called “corona” will
determine the cellular response of the host cells. It has been reported in animal studies
that coating with DPPC markedly increased uptake and lung retention of nanoparticles
compared to coating with BSA [22,23]. To take the effect of the DPPC binding into account,
CNT4003 particles were suspended in simulated lung fluid (SLF), a phosphate buffer
containing 0.02% DPPC.
Sauer et al. compared the cytotoxicity of respiratory toxicants in A549 and 3T3 mono-
layers, MucilAir™ and EpiAirway™ tissues [24], but there is no systematic comparison
between models based on cell lines and commercially available reconstructed tissues of
bronchial and respiratory part. This comparison is important because the use of the more
complex reconstructed tissues is associated with higher costs. The aim of this study was to
identify adverse effects of standardized CNTs in physiologically relevant systems and to re-
veal the role of the testing system. To this end, effects of CNT4003 particles were compared
in models of different complexity (monolayers vs. multilayers) and origin (primary vs. cell
lines). The focus is not on cytotoxicity but on functional aspects because physiologically
relevant exposure doses to CNTs are too low to act acutely toxic. For the bronchial part of
the airways Calu-3 cells, EpiAirway™ and MucilAir™ were used. Effects of CNT4003 on
the alveolar part of the airways were studied using A549 cells and EpiAlveolar™ tissues
with and without THP-1 macrophages.
4
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
5
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S) and 10% FBS. THP-1 was purchased from Cell Line
Services (Eppelheim, Germany) and cultured in RPMI, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% peni-
cillin/streptomycin and 10% FBS. Cells were passaged at regular intervals.
For the exposures with the CNTs, 0.5 × 106 Calu-3 cells were seeded in 500 μL MEM,
2% L-glutamine and 1% PS + 10% FBS on 12-well polyethylene terephthalate transwell
inserts (pore size 0.4 μm, Greiner Bio-one, Kremsmünster, Austria) with 1500 μL of the
same medium in the basolateral compartment. Medium in the apical compartment was
removed after 24 h, and the medium amount in the basolateral compartment was reduced
to 500 μL, which was changed every 2 or 3 days. Cells were used for the experiments when
they had reached a transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) value of >300 Ω × cm2 .
A549 was seeded at a density of 0.8 × 105 in DMEM + 10% FBS on 12-well polyethylene
terephthalate transwell inserts (pore size 0.4 μm, Greiner Bio-one) with 1500 μL of the
same medium in the basolateral compartment. Medium in the apical compartment was
removed after 24 h as reported previously [27]. According to these experiments, the ratio
of 9 alveolar cells to 1 alveolar macrophage observed in vivo [28] is obtained by seeding
THP-1 macrophages to the cultured A549 cells in a ratio 1:1. A549 cells were cultured for
9 days in ALI prior to the addition of the THP-1 cells and the average number of A549 cells
was determined in duplicates. For the coculture, RPMI + 10% FBS was added in the basal
compartment and the medium changed every other day.
6
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
7
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
GmbH) and indicated as beats/second (Hz). In the later experiments, only propranolol
was used because no prominent increase in CBF was seen.
2.12. Histology
MatTek tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin us-
ing Tissue-Tek® VIP™ 5 (SanovaPharma GesmbH, Gallspach, Austria). Radial sections
of 2–5 μm were cut at a rotary microtome, stained with hemalaun and viewed with an
Olympus BX51 microscope. Additional sections were cut for immunocytochemical staining.
2.13. Statistics
Experiments were performed in triplicates and repeated at least two times. Data from
all experiments were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by
8
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
Tukey’s HSD post hoc test for multiple comparisons (SPSS 28 software). Results with
p-values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
3. Results
In all evaluations, CNT4003 was applied in SLF and the following parameters and
assays used as readout: MTS assay for cytotoxicity, TEER measurements for epithelial
barrier tightness, interleukin 6 and 8 levels for proinflammatory effects, movement of
polystyrene marker particles for mucociliary clearance and high-speed video microscopy
for ciliary beating frequency. IL-6 is a marker for acute and chronic inflammation and
IL-8 a marker for acute inflammation and a chemoattractant for neutrophils [18]. Doses
are indicated as μg/insert and the distribution of CNT4003 on the cell-grown inserts
documented. After 14 d of exposure, several CNT4003 agglomerates were visible in the
central region of inserts containing mucus-producing cells and rare agglomerates in the
inserts containing EpiAlveolar™ tissues (Figure S1, Supplementary Material). This can be
explained by the fact that mucus can trap the agglomerates better than surfactant.
3.1. Particle Effect in Models of the Bronchial Part of the Respiratory Tract
Calu-3 cells, EpiAirway™ and MucilAir™ tissues were used as models for the bronchial
part and A549 and EpiAlveolar™ tissues with and without macrophages as models for
the alveolar part. The models were characterized regarding the stability and ability to
react to LPS as an inflammatory stimulus. Evaluation of CNT4003 effects over 14 d cor-
responded to the recommendation of Behrsing et al. for analysis in EpiAirway™s and
MucilAir™ tissues [29].
Stability of the Calu-3 model has been shown previously [32]. In this study, TEER
values decreased significantly from 1 d to 14 d of culture in all cultures with no difference
between untreated and CNT4003-treated cultures (Figure 2). The decrease upon LPS
treatment at 7 d was significant compared to 1 d and also significantly more pronounced
than that of the control.
9
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
Stimulation with 10 μg LPS increased IL-6 and IL-8 secretions at all time points
significantly (Table 1). Interleukin-6 levels of cultures treated with 25 μg CNT4003 after one
and seven days were significantly lower than the levels of the controls (Table 1). Interleukin
8 levels were significantly increased after one day and decreased after seven days. No
changes were seen after 14 days.
Table 1. Time-dependent changes (%) of cytokine secretion by Calu-3 upon stimulation with 10 μg
LPS or 25 μg CNT4003. Secretion of unstimulated tissues is set as 100%. Significant differences
(p < 0.05) between treated and untreated samples are indicated by an asterisk.
10
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
Figure 3. Morphology of EpiAirway™ tissues according to hemalaun staining (A) and cellular
composition according to immunochistochemical staining. Scale bar: 100 μm. Anti-α-tubulin (B) and
anti-mucin 5AC (C) staining (green) for visualization of bronchial epithelial and goblet cells. Controls
with mouse IgG instead of primary antibody are shown on the right side. Nuclei are counterstained
with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bar 50 μm.
EpiAirway™ tissues reacted to stimulation with all concentrations of LPS with signifi-
ant increases of IL-6 and IL-8 secretions compared to unstimulated tissues at all time points
with the exception of IL-6 at day 7 (Table 2).
For assessment of the clearance function of the bronchial epithelium, mucociliary
clearance and CBF were evaluated. No transport of the polystyrene indicator beads was
detected in the EpiAirway™ tissues, presumably due to the low density of the cilia.
11
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
Table 2. Time-dependent changes (%) of cytokine secretion by EpiAirway™ tissues upon stimulation
to 1, 5 and 10 μg lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Secretion of unstimulated tissues is set as 100%. Significant
differences (p < 0.05) between treated and untreated samples are indicated by an asterisk.
Prior to the assessment of CNT4003, the reaction to LPS was tested. It was found
that exposure to LPS (1, 5, 10 μg) increased CBF at all concentrations significantly from
9.9 ± 1.7 Hz (untreated controls) to 15.3–17.8 Hz at 7 d and from 12.7 ± 1.4 Hz (untreated
controls) to 15.1–16.2 Hz at 14 d. Basal CBF was significantly lower in this batch of tissues
than the frequencies measured in the batch where CNT4003 were tested and no LPS
was included.
CBF of untreated tissues was highest at 1 d and significantly lower at all time points
(Table 3). The positive control propranolol decreased CBF significantly at all time points.
Significant decreases of CBF upon exposure to CNT4003 compared to the respective
medium control were not noted. There was a trend of higher CBF in the peripheral
regions (15.8 ± 4.2 Hz) than in the central regions of the insert (14.7 ± 2.8 Hz).
Table 3. Ciliary beating frequency (Hz) in EpiAirway™ tissues after exposure to negative control,
positive control (propranolol) or CNT4003. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between treated and
untreated samples are indicated by an asterisk. Significant changes over time of the untreated tissues
are marked by a hash.
3.1.3. MucilAir™
MucilAir™ tissues are composed of two to three rows of cells. Cilia are already visible
in the hemalaun staining (Figure 5A). They form much longer structures at the apical surface
(Figure 5B) than in the EpiAirway™ tissue (Figure 3B). Further, rare mucin-producing cells
can be seen in the MucilAir™ tissues (Figure 5C).
TEER values of the untreated MucilAir™ cultures significantly decreased over 21 d
for cultures from 563 ± 66 Ω × cm2 at 1 d to 282 ± 24 Ω × cm2 at 21 d. Therefore, tissues
were studied for only 14 d of exposure with LPS and CNT4003. While TEER values of the
LPS-treated tissues were significantly decreased compared to 1 d, CNT4003 particles did
not affect TEER values over the entire observation time of 14 d (Figure 6).
The reactivity of the tissues to an inflammatory stimulus was tested by incubation with
1, 5 and 10 μg LPS at 1 d, 7 d and 14 d and quantification of IL-6 and IL-8 was performed.
IL-6 levels in LPS-stimulated cultures at all time points and all LPS concentrations were
significantly lower than that of the untreated controls (Table 4), which is consistent with
other studies reporting low IL-6 levels in LPS-stimulated MucilAir™ tissues. In contrast to
the action of IL-6, a robust increase in IL-8 secretion was seen after stimulation with LPS at
all concentrations. Metz et al. suggested that concentrations of 10 μg/mL LPS were too
low to induce a significant increase in IL-6 [33]. IL-6 secretions of the CNT4003-stimulated
MucilAir™ tissues were significantly lower than the unstimulated tissues at all time points
12
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
(Table 4). IL-8 secretions were also significantly lower than that of the unstimulated controls,
except at 1 d.
Figure 5. Morphology of MucilAir™ tissues according to hemalaun staining (A, scale bar: 100 μm)
and cellular composition of the tissues according to immunocytochemistry (B,C). Anti-α-tubulin
staining (green, (B)) visualized cilia of bronchial epithelial cells and anti-mucin 5AC staining (green,
(C)) visualized goblet cells. Nuclei are counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bar 50 μm.
MucilAir™ tissues were able to transport the polystyrene marker beads. However,
since there was no coordinated beating like in the in vivo situation, there was no linear
transport of the beads. If transport was seen, the beads moved in circles (Video S1, Supple-
mentary Material). Quantification of the effect of the CNT4003 particles was not possible
because the diameter and number of the vortexes showed prominent variations between the
tissues. The diameter had an influence on the velocity because transport at the periphery
of the vortex was faster than at the center.
CBF of untreated tissues was significantly increased at 14 d compared to 1 d (Table 5).
Propranolol treatment decreased CBF significantly at all time points. Additionally, the
treatment with 10 μg LPS decreased CBF significantly at 14 d. There was no difference
between central (19.5 ± 7.1 Hz) and peripheral regions of the insert (20.6 ± 6.0 Hz).
CNT4003 exposure did not changes CBF to significant degree.
13
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
Table 4. Time-dependent changes (%) of cytokine secretion by MucilAir™ tissues upon stimulation
with 1, 5 and 10 μg lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or CNT4003. Secretion of unstimulated tissues is set as
100%. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between treated and untreated samples are indicated by an
asterisk. Abbreviation: n.a., not available.
Table 5. Ciliary beating frequency (Hz) in MucilAir™ tissues after exposure to control, lipopolysac-
charide (LPS) or 25 μg CNT4003. Significant (p < 0.05) differences in the medium-treated group at
different time points are indicated by an asterisk and differences of the treatment to the medium
control with a hash.
3.2. Assessment of Effects in Models for the Alveolar Part of the Respiratory Tract
3.2.1. A549 Monocultures and Coculture with THP-1 Macrophages
Exposure to 12.5 and 25 μg CNT4003 had no negative effect on the viability of A549
cells in monoculture and coculture with THP-1, but exposure to 50 μg CNT decreased
viability significantly in both types of cultures (Figure S3, Supplementary Material).
A549 cells in mono and coculture with THP-1 macrophages secrete low basal levels of
IL-6 (A549 monoculture; 0–1.4 pg/mL and 0.04–0.1 pg/mL in coculture; ref. [27]) and were
below the limit of detection in this study. They react, however, at lower concentrations than
the bronchial models to LPS and, upon stimulation with LPS, IL-6 levels between 140 and
279 pg/mL in A549 monocultures and between 2 and 3 ng/mL in cocultures with THP-1
were measured. IL-8 levels were 21–27 ng/mL and 53–84 ng/mL, respectively (Table 6).
This indicates that the cocultures produced approximately 10 times higher amounts of IL-6
and 4 times higher levels of IL-8 upon LPS stimulation than the A549 monocultures. In
contrast to LPS, exposure to 25 μg CNT4003 did not stimulate the secretion of IL-6 and IL-8,
which remained below the detection limit.
Table 6. Time-dependent changes in interleukin 6 secretion (pg/mL) and interleukin 8 (ng/mL) secre-
tion by A549 mono and A549/THP-1 coculture upon stimulation with 100 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide
(LPS). Since cytokine levels of untreated cultures were zero or below zero, normalization to % of
control could not be made.
14
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
Figure 7. Radial section of EpiAlveolar™ tissues without THP-1 (A) and with THP-1 (B) macrophages.
Endothelial cells at the basal side of the transwell membrane are visible in B (arrow). (C) CD45-
immunoreactive THP-1 macrophages are rarely seen (arrowhead). Scale bar 50 μm.
15
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
Figure 8. TEER values of EpiAlveolar™ tissues with and without THP-1 treated with control (SLF) or
12.5 and 25 μg CNT4003 particles at 7 d.
Table 7. Time-dependent changes (in %) of cytokine secretion by EpiAlveolar™ tissues without THP-
1 (Epi) and with THP-1 (Epi/THP-1) upon stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and CNT4003.
Secretion of unstimulated tissues is set as 100%. Significant increases (p < 0.05) between treated and
untreated samples are indicated by an asterisk and significant decreases by a paragraph sign.
4. Discussion
The tightness of the epithelial barrier and low basal levels of proinflammatory cy-
tokines, are crucial properties of the healthy lung, and the used models should be able to
assess these parameters. In this comprehensive study, CNTs were evaluated for potential
adverse effects on the bronchial and alveolar part of the respiratory system. Further, not
only acute cytotoxicity but also epithelial barrier properties, release of cytokines and CBF
were used as readout parameters.
16
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
Similar to the values in this study, IL-6 and IL-8 values in EpiAirway™ tissues were
reported as 100–350 pg/mL and 14,500 ± 3000 pg/mL, respectively [8], and 91 ± 40 pg/mL
IL-6 and 5300 ± 220 pg/mL IL-8 [36]. Interbatch levels of IL-6 and IL-8 secretion in
MucilAir™ can vary by a factor of two to four (IL-6: 58 ± 26–205 ± 130 pg/mL and
IL-8: 4.14 ± 0.61–8.19 ± 3.29 ng/mL) [37]. MucilAir™ tissues in this study secreted up to
358 pg/mL IL-6, while IL-8 were around 100 times higher. The much lower IL-6 than IL-8
secretion by MucilAir™ tissues has also been observed in other studies (100 pg/mL vs.
10,000 pg/mL; [38]). Therefore, most researchers used only IL-8 with basal secretions of
~20 ng/mL, 1.8–5.2 ng/mL and 5–30 ng/mL as indicator for inflammation [39–41].
Normal CBF in human bronchi was reported as 12–15 Hz [42], but great variation
from 4 to 19 Hz were reported for human conducting airways [43]. For bronchial epithelial
cells of EpiAirway™, a basal CBF of ~18 Hz (17.62–18.02 Hz) has been reported [44], which
is slightly lower than the frequencies determined in this study. MucilAir™ tissues in this
study had higher CBF than EpiAirway™ tissues. The different ratio of cilia-bearing to
mucus-producing cells between the tissues may be the reason for this difference. The
average CBF of MucilAir™ tissues in the literature are indicated as 15.8 ± 0.3 Hz and
11.7 ± 1.2 Hz [43,45], and Beyeler et al. observed higher CBF in the peripheral than in the
central region [18]. This trend was also to some extent seen in the EpiAirway™ tissues
but not in the MucilAir™ tissues of this study. It indicates that it might be good to use
similar regions of the insert for the analysis and indicate that in the protocol, e.g., Kim et al.
measured 1–2 mm away from the center of the insert [46]. While propranolol reduced CBF,
no marked increase in CBF upon administration of forskolin to the tissues was seen. The
lack of a strong increase of CBF was also observed in mouse and rat lung slices [47,48]. The
authors hypothesized that cells were preactivated by the mechanical manipulation and
beat at their maximum frequency. A decrease of CBF has been observed as a reaction to
bacteria and diesel exhaust particles and can be interpreted as a toxic response [42]. In this
study, 10 μg LPS decreased CBF in the MucilAir™ tissues but increased it in EpiAirway™
tissues. The different reaction may be due to the different basal CBF, which were ~10 Hz in
EpiAirway™ and 28 Hz in MucilAir™ tissues. While the reconstructed tissues presented
the advantage that detection of CBF was possible, artificial stimulation of CBF by manual
manipulation of the insert, differences due to interdonor differences or damage by long
shipping times are disadvantages compared to in-house models based on cell lines.
17
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
7476–30,524 pg/mL in EpiAlveolar™ tissues without THP-1 for IL-8). Similar to that study,
we did not detect a major influence of THP-1 macrophages on the basal secretion of the
interleukins. Upon LPS stimulation, increases were in a similar range for EpiAlveolar™
tissues with and without THP-1 for IL-6 and IL-8 secretions. Coculture with THP-1, by
contrast, increased cytokine release markedly upon stimulation with LPS. Increased release
of a various proinflammatory cytokines upon LPS stimulation by A549/THP-1 cocultures
compared to A549 monocultures has been reported and was reported to be caused by
activation of NF-κB [49,50]. The lack of a pronounced response in the EpiAlveolar™ tissues
may be due to anti-inflammatory effects by the other cells present in the tissue construct.
5. Conclusions
Cytotoxicity, TEER values, interleukin secretion and CBF show no indication of adverse
effects of CNT4003 in the bronchial part of the respiratory tract. The increased IL-6 secretion
of the EpiAlveolar™ tissues may indicate adverse effects of CNT4003 on the alveolar part
of the lung. Since the doses for whole-life exposure of workers were applied over a shorter
time, the physiological relevance is not clear. Although the reconstructed tissues are
produced in a standardized way, considerable variations in basal parameters between
batches were seen. In addition to the interdonor differences, the duration of the delivery
from the producer to the laboratory of the user has an effect on the viability and reaction of
the tissues.
18
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https:
//www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13040682/s1. Figures S1–S4: Distribution of CNT4003 on
cell-grown inserts; cytotoxicity of CNT4003 in Calu-3 cells; cytotoxicity of CNT4003 in A549 cells;
cytotoxicity of CNT4003 in EpiAlveolar™ tissues; Table S1: LPS-induced cytokine secretion by
EpiAlveolar™ tissues; Video S1: Mucociliary clearance in MucilAir™ tissues.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, E.F.; methodology and data curation, C.M., R.J., M.A.-N.;
writing—original draft preparation, C.M. and E.F.; writing—review and editing, C.M., E.R. and E.F.;
visualization, M.A.-N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: PETA Science Consortium International e.V. supported this research with an Award from
MatTek Life Sciences for 3D human tissue models to assess respiratory toxicity to E.F.
Data Availability Statement: Datasets analyzed or generated during the study are available upon
request from the authors.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Najahi-Missaoui, W.; Arnold, R.D.; Cummings, B.S. Safe Nanoparticles: Are We There Yet? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 385.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Dusinská, M.; Collins, A.; Kazimírová, A.; Barancoková, M.; Harrington, V.; Volkovová, K.; Staruchová, M.; Horská, A.; Wsólová,
L.; Kocan, A.; et al. Genotoxic effects of asbestos in humans. Mutat. Res. 2004, 553, 91–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Fröhlich, E.; Mercuri, A.; Wu, S.; Salar-Behzadi, S. Measurements of Deposition, Lung Surface Area and Lung Fluid for Simulation
of Inhaled Compounds. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 181. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Chetyrkina, M.R.; Fedorov, F.S.; Nasibulin, A.G. In vitro toxicity of carbon nanotubes: A systematic review. RSC Adv. 2022, 12,
16235–16256. [CrossRef]
5. Cotogno, G.; Totaro, S.; Rasmussen, K.; Pianella, F.; Roncaglia, M.; Olsson, H.; Riego Sintes, J.; Crutzen, H. The JRC Nanomaterials
Repository Safe Handling of Nanomaterials in the Sub-Sampling Facility; JRC Technical Reports; European Union: Ispra, Italy, 2016.
6. Jensen, K.; Kembouche, Y.; Christiansen, E.; Jacobsen, N.; Wallin, H. The Generic NANOGENOTOX Dispersion Protocol—Standard
Operation Procedure (SOP) and Background Documentation; The National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NRCWE):
Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011.
7. Lee, J.H.; Ahn, K.H.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, E.; Lee, G.H.; Han, J.H.; Yu, I.J. Three-Day Continuous Exposure Monitoring of CNT
Manufacturing Workplaces. Biomed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 237140. [CrossRef]
8. Seagrave, J.; Dunaway, S.; McDonald, J.D.; Mauderly, J.L.; Hayden, P.; Stidley, C. Responses of differentiated primary human lung
epithelial cells to exposure to diesel exhaust at an air-liquid interface. Exp. Lung Res. 2007, 33, 27–51. [CrossRef]
9. Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.B.; Bae, G.N.; Jeon, K.S.; Yoon, J.U.; Ji, J.H.; Sung, J.H.; Lee, B.G.; Lee, J.H.; Yang, J.S.; et al. Exposure assessment of
carbon nanotube manufacturing workplaces. Inhal. Toxicol. 2010, 22, 369–381. [CrossRef]
10. Fujitani, Y.; Furuyama, A.; Hirano, S. Generation of Airborne Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Inhalation Studies. Aerosol Sci.
Technol. 2009, 43, 881–890. [CrossRef]
11. Di Ianni, E.; Erdem, J.S.; Møller, P.; Sahlgren, N.M.; Poulsen, S.S.; Knudsen, K.B.; Zienolddiny, S.; Saber, A.T.; Wallin, H.; Vogel, U.; et al.
In vitro-in vivo correlations of pulmonary inflammogenicity and genotoxicity of MWCNT. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2021, 18, 25. [CrossRef]
12. Grainger, C.I.; Greenwell, L.L.; Lockley, D.J.; Martin, G.P.; Forbes, B. Culture of Calu-3 cells at the air interface provides a
representative model of the airway epithelial barrier. Pharm. Res. 2006, 23, 1482–1490. [CrossRef]
13. Öhlinger, K.; Kolesnik, T.; Meindl, C.; Gallé, B.; Absenger-Novak, M.; Kolb-Lenz, D.; Fröhlich, E. Air-liquid interface culture
changes surface properties of A549 cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 2019, 60, 369–382. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Kreft, M.E.; Jerman, U.D.; Lasic, E.; Hevir-Kene, N.; Rizner, T.L.; Peternel, L.; Kristan, K. The characterization of the human
cell line Calu-3 under different culture conditions and its use as an optimized in vitro model to investigate bronchial epithelial
function. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 69, 1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. George, I.; Vranic, S.; Boland, S.; Courtois, A.; Baeza-Squiban, A. Development of an in vitro model of human bronchial epithelial
barrier to study nanoparticle translocation. Toxicol. In Vitro 2015, 29, 51–58. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Buckley, S.; Kim, K.; Ehrhardt, C. In Vitro Cell Culture Models for Evaluating Controlled Release Pulmonary Drug Delivery. In
Controlled Pulmonary Drug Delivery; Smyth, H., Hickey, A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 417–442.
17. Barosova, H.; Maione, A.G.; Septiadi, D.; Sharma, M.; Haeni, L.; Balog, S.; O’Connell, O.; Jackson, G.R.; Brown, D.; Clippinger,
A.J.; et al. Use of EpiAlveolar Lung Model to Predict Fibrotic Potential of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2020, 14,
3941–3956. [CrossRef]
18. Beyeler, S.; Chortarea, S.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B.; Petri-Fink, A.; Wick, P.; Tschanz, S.A.; von Garnier, C.; Blank, F. Acute effects
of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on primary bronchial epithelial cells from COPD patients. Nanotoxicology 2018, 12, 699–711.
[CrossRef]
19
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
19. Chortarea, S.; Barosova, H.; Clift, M.J.D.; Wick, P.; Petri-Fink, A.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B. Human Asthmatic Bronchial Cells Are
More Susceptible to Subchronic Repeated Exposures of Aerosolized Carbon Nanotubes At Occupationally Relevant Doses Than
Healthy Cells. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 7615–7625. [CrossRef]
20. Fröhlich, E. Toxicity of orally inhaled drug formulations at the alveolar barrier: Parameters for initial biological screening. Drug
Deliv. 2017, 24, 891–905. [CrossRef]
21. Lima, T.; Bernfur, K.; Vilanova, M.; Cedervall, T. Understanding the Lipid and Protein Corona Formation on Different Sized
Polymeric Nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1129. [CrossRef]
22. Carregal-Romero, S.; Groult, H.; Cañadas, O.; Noelia, A.; Lechuga-Vieco, A.V.; García-Fojeda, B.; Herranz, F.; Pellico, J.; Hidalgo,
A.; Casals, C.; et al. Delayed alveolar clearance of nanoparticles through control of coating composition and interaction with lung
surfactant protein A. Biomater. Adv. 2022, 134, 112551. [CrossRef]
23. Kaur, R.; Dennison, S.R.; Burrow, A.J.; Rudramurthy, S.M.; Swami, R.; Gorki, V.; Katare, O.P.; Kaushik, A.; Singh, B.; Singh,
K.K. Nebulised surface-active hybrid nanoparticles of voriconazole for pulmonary Aspergillosis demonstrate clathrin-mediated
cellular uptake, improved antifungal efficacy and lung retention. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 19. [CrossRef]
24. Sauer, U.G.; Vogel, S.; Hess, A.; Kolle, S.N.; Ma-Hock, L.; van Ravenzwaay, B.; Landsiedel, R. In vivo-in vitro comparison of acute
respiratory tract toxicity using human 3D airway epithelial models and human A549 and murine 3T3 monolayer cell systems.
Toxicol. In Vitro 2013, 27, 174–190. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Rasmussen, K.; Mast, J.; De Temmerman, P.; Verleysen, E.; Waegeneers, N.; Van Steen, F.; Pizzolon, J.; De Temmerman, L.;
Van Doren, E.; Jensen, K.; et al. Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes, NM-400, NM-401, NM-402, NM-403: Characterisation and
Physico-Chemical Properties; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2014.
26. Jacobsen, N.; Pojano, G.; Wallin, H.; Jensen, K. Nanomaterial Dispersion Protocol for Toxicological Studies in ENPRA; Internal ENPRA
Report; National Research Centre for the Working Environment: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2010.
27. Meindl, C.; Öhlinger, K.; Zrim, V.; Steinkogler, T.; Fröhlich, E. Screening for Effects of Inhaled Nanoparticles in Cell Culture
Models for Prolonged Exposure. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 606. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Jantzen, K.; Roursgaard, M.; Desler, C.; Loft, S.; Rasmussen, L.J.; Møller, P. Oxidative damage to DNA by diesel exhaust particle
exposure in co-cultures of human lung epithelial cells and macrophages. Mutagenesis 2012, 27, 693–701. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Behrsing, H.P.; Wahab, A.; Ukishima, L.; Grodi, C.; Frentzel, S.; Johne, S.; Ishikawa, S.; Ito, S.; Wieczorek, R.; Budde, J.; et al.
Ciliary Beat Frequency: Proceedings and Recommendations from a Multi-laboratory Ring Trial Using 3-D Reconstituted Human
Airway Epithelium to Model Mucociliary Clearance. Altern. Lab. Anim. 2022, 50, 293–309. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Mohri, H.; Inaba, K.; Ishijima, S.; Baba, S.A. Tubulin-dynein system in flagellar and ciliary movement. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys.
Biol. Sci. 2012, 88, 397–415. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Binarová, P.; Tuszynski, J. Tubulin: Structure, Functions and Roles in Disease. Cells 2019, 8, 1294. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Fröhlich, E.; Meindl, C. In Vitro Assessment of Chronic Nanoparticle Effects on Respiratory Cells. In Nanomaterials—Toxicity and
Risk Assessment; Soloneski, S., Larramendy, M., Eds.; InTech Open: Rijeka, Croatia, 2015; pp. 69–91.
33. Metz, J.; Knoth, K.; Groß, H.; Lehr, C.M.; Stäbler, C.; Bock, U.; Hittinger, M. Combining MucilAir™ and Vitrocell(® ) Powder
Chamber for the In Vitro Evaluation of Nasal Ointments in the Context of Aerosolized Pollen. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 56.
[CrossRef]
34. Fields, W.; Maione, A.; Keyser, B.; Bombick, B. Characterization and Application of the VITROCELL VC1 Smoke Exposure System
and 3D EpiAirway Models for Toxicological and e-Cigarette Evaluations. Appl. Vitr. Toxicol. 2017, 3, 68–83. [CrossRef]
35. Ren, D.; Nelson, K.L.; Uchakin, P.N.; Smith, A.L.; Gu, X.X.; Daines, D.A. Characterization of extended co-culture of non-typeable
Haemophilus influenzae with primary human respiratory tissues. Exp. Biol. Med. 2012, 237, 540–547. [CrossRef]
36. Zavala, J.; O’Brien, B.; Lichtveld, K.; Sexton, K.G.; Rusyn, I.; Jaspers, I.; Vizuete, W. Assessment of biological responses of
EpiAirway 3-D cell constructs versus A549 cells for determining toxicity of ambient air pollution. Inhal. Toxicol. 2016, 28, 251–259.
[CrossRef]
37. Welch, J.; Wallace, J.; Lansley, A.B.; Roper, C. Evaluation of the toxicity of sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) in the MucilAir™
human airway model in vitro. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2021, 125, 105022. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Kooter, I.; Ilves, M.; Gröllers-Mulderij, M.; Duistermaat, E.; Tromp, P.C.; Kuper, F.; Kinaret, P.; Savolainen, K.; Greco, D.; Karisola,
P.; et al. Molecular Signature of Asthma-Enhanced Sensitivity to CuO Nanoparticle Aerosols from 3D Cell Model. ACS Nano 2019,
13, 6932–6946. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. George, I.; Uboldi, C.; Bernard, E.; Sobrido, M.S.; Dine, S.; Hagège, A.; Vrel, D.; Herlin, N.; Rose, J.; Orsière, T.; et al. Toxicological
Assessment of ITER-Like Tungsten Nanoparticles Using an In Vitro 3D Human Airway Epithelium Model. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1374.
[CrossRef]
40. Huang, S.; Constant, S.; De Servi, B.; Meloni, M.; Culig, J.; Bertini, M.; Saaid, A. In vitro safety and performance evaluation of
a seawater solution enriched with copper, hyaluronic acid, and eucalyptus for nasal lavage. Med. Devices 2019, 12, 399–410.
[CrossRef]
41. Kirkpatrick, D.L.; Millard, J. Evaluation of nafamostat mesylate safety and inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication using a 3-
dimensional human airway epithelia model. bioRxiv 2020. [CrossRef]
42. Workman, A.D.; Cohen, N.A. The effect of drugs and other compounds on the ciliary beat frequency of human respiratory
epithelium. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2014, 28, 454–464. [CrossRef]
20
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 682
43. Lodes, N.; Seidensticker, K.; Perniss, A.; Nietzer, S.; Oberwinkler, H.; May, T.; Walles, T.; Hebestreit, H.; Hackenberg, S.; Steinke,
M. Investigation on Ciliary Functionality of Different Airway Epithelial Cell Lines in Three-Dimensional Cell Culture. Tissue Eng.
Part A 2020, 26, 432–440. [CrossRef]
44. Woodhams, A.; Kidd, D.; Hollings, M. Use of Cilia Beat Frequency in an In Vitro Airway Model (EpiAirway-FT) as a Tool for
Assessing Viability. 2018. Available online: https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/abstracts/2018_TSRC08_Woodhams.
pdf (accessed on 2 November 2020).
45. Phillips, G.; Czekala, L.; Behrsing, H.; Amin, K.; Budde, J.; Stevenson, M.; Wieczorek, R.; Walele, T.; Simms, L. Acute electronic
vapour product whole aerosol exposure of 3D human bronchial tissue results in minimal cellular and transcriptomic responses
when compared to cigarette smoke. Toxicol. Res. Appl. 2021, 5, 2397847320988496. [CrossRef]
46. Kim, M.D.; Baumlin, N.; Yoshida, M.; Polineni, D.; Salathe, S.F.; David, J.K.; Peloquin, C.A.; Wanner, A.; Dennis, J.S.; Sailland,
J.; et al. Losartan Rescues Inflammation-related Mucociliary Dysfunction in Relevant Models of Cystic Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit.
Care Med. 2020, 201, 313–324. [CrossRef]
47. Delmotte, P.; Sanderson, M.J. Ciliary beat frequency is maintained at a maximal rate in the small airways of mouse lung slices.
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2006, 35, 110–117. [CrossRef]
48. Hayashi, T.; Kawakami, M.; Sasaki, S.; Katsumata, T.; Mori, H.; Yoshida, H.; Nakahari, T. ATP regulation of ciliary beat frequency
in rat tracheal and distal airway epithelium. Exp. Physiol. 2005, 90, 535–544. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49. Li, J.; Qin, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, P.; Liu, X.; Dong, H.; Zheng, W.; Feng, S.; Mao, X.; Li, C. Mechanisms of the lipopolysaccharide-
induced inflammatory response in alveolar epithelial cell/macrophage co-culture. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 20, 76. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
50. Grabowski, N.; Hillaireau, H.; Vergnaud-Gauduchon, J.; Nicolas, V.; Tsapis, N.; Kerdine-Römer, S.; Fattal, E. Surface-Modified
Biodegradable Nanoparticles’ Impact on Cytotoxicity and Inflammation Response on a Co-Culture of Lung Epithelial Cells and
Human-Like Macrophages. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2016, 12, 135–146. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Gangwal, S.; Brown, J.S.; Wang, A.; Houck, K.A.; Dix, D.J.; Kavlock, R.J.; Hubal, E.A. Informing selection of nanomaterial
concentrations for ToxCast in vitro testing based on occupational exposure potential. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119,
1539–1546. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52. Tonks, A.; Morris, R.H.; Price, A.J.; Thomas, A.W.; Jones, K.P.; Jackson, S.K. Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine modulates inflammatory
functions of monocytic cells independently of mitogen activated protein kinases. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2001, 124, 86–94. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
21
nanomaterials
Article
The Effects of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on Osteoblasts
Mineralization: A Comparison between 2D and 3D Cell
Culture Models
Gabriela de Souza Castro 1,† , Wanderson de Souza 2,† , Thais Suelen Mello Lima 2 , Danielle Cabral Bonfim 3 ,
Jacques Werckmann 4 , Braulio Soares Archanjo 5 , José Mauro Granjeiro 2 , Ana Rosa Ribeiro 6
and Sara Gemini-Piperni 1,7, *
Abstract: Although several studies assess the biological effects of micro and titanium dioxide nanopar-
ticles (TiO2 NPs), the literature shows controversial results regarding their effect on bone cell behavior.
Studies on the effects of nanoparticles on mammalian cells on two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures
display several disadvantages, such as changes in cell morphology, function, and metabolism and
fewer cell–cell contacts. This highlights the need to explore the effects of TiO2 NPs in more complex
Citation: de Souza Castro, G.; de 3D environments, to better mimic the bone microenvironment. This study aims to compare the dif-
Souza, W.; Lima, T.S.M.; Bonfim, ferentiation and mineralized matrix production of human osteoblasts SAOS-2 in a monolayer or 3D
D.C.; Werckmann, J.; Archanjo, B.S.; models after exposure to different concentrations of TiO2 NPs. Nanoparticles were characterized, and
Granjeiro, J.M.; Ribeiro, A.R.; their internalization and effects on the SAOS-2 monolayer and 3D spheroid cells were evaluated with
Gemini-Piperni, S. The Effects of morphological analysis. The mineralization of human osteoblasts upon exposure to TiO2 NPs was
Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on
evaluated by alizarin red staining, demonstrating a dose-dependent increase in mineralized matrix
Osteoblasts Mineralization: A
in human primary osteoblasts and SAOS-2 both in the monolayer and 3D models. Furthermore,
Comparison between 2D and 3D Cell
our results reveal that, after high exposure to TiO2 NPs, the dose-dependent increase in the bone
Culture Models. Nanomaterials 2023,
13, 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/
mineralized matrix in the 3D cells model is higher than in the 2D culture, showing a promising model
nano13030425 to test the effect on bone osteointegration.
Prothesis degradation processes occur in all material classes, with degradation by-
products known to be hazardous. Nonetheless, nanoscale metallic debris released are of
tremendous concern since they exhibit enhanced toxicity and dissolving capacities, com-
pared with micron-size polymeric and ceramic debris [7]. Micromovements between the
implant abutment and the bone or mucosa unavoidably lead to mechanical wear of the ma-
terial (formation of nano and microsized debris), which in a corrosive environment result
in the release of metallic ions [7,10–12]. Biologically, this event is related to macrophage
activation [7,10,11,13] and the onset of pro-inflammatory response, with the release of
cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in the peri-implant area, which culminates in re-
duced osteoblastogenesis, increased osteoclastogenesis, and bone loss in the periprosthetic
region [11,13]. Bone loss limits the ability of a prosthesis to withstand physiological loads,
giving rise to a need for revision surgery.
Many in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that titanium particles induce pro-
inflammatory and toxic effects in the peri-implant environment [7,14–17]. However, some
in vitro studies also suggest that TiO2 NPs can stimulate bone formation [2,18]. Thus,
controversy remains about the actual role of TiO2 NPs on bone cells, likely due to the
two-dimensional in vitro models used.
It has been widely reported that 2D osteoblast cell cultures [13–17,19] may lose their
original tissue organization and polarity and have limited protein–protein interactions [2,18].
They may exhibit integrins and changes in the cytoskeletal organization that alter their
original morphology [2,18,20]. In addition, cells grown in a 2D monolayer often exhibit
altered metabolism, phenotype, and gene expression, and the interactions between cells and
the extracellular matrix are different from in vivo tissues, which have a three-dimensional
architecture [2,20]. In contrast, 3D culture models exhibit greater cell–cell and cell–matrix
interactions, which are closer to the in vivo model [21]. Moreover, cellular polarity, which is
important for cellular organization and functionality, remains unaltered [2,21,22]. Therefore,
surface receptors can bind to extracellular matrix proteins, activate cellular biochemical
signals, and influence cell proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization [2,21].
Therefore, in this work, the effects of TiO2 NPs on the differentiation and production of
a mineralized matrix of human osteoblasts cultured in monolayer (2D) and osteoblast-like
spheroid culture models (3D) were investigated. Cell viability, morphology, differentiation,
mineralization, and nanoparticle internalization were investigated after exposure to NPs.
Results demonstrate that TiO2 NPs lead to a dose-dependent increase in mineralization,
although these TiO2 NPs are clinically known for their possible immune system activation.
24
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
with DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (PS—
10,000 units/mL of penicillin and 10,000 μg/mL of streptomycin) (PS, Gibco) in a humidi-
fied incubator (5% CO2 , 37 ◦ C). Cell contamination with bacteria, fungi, or mycoplasma
was analyzed as previously reported [2,5]. For the 2D model, 10,000 cells/well were seeded
in standard flat-bottom 96-well plates for 24 h.
3D culture: For 3D spheroid formation, 96-well U-bottom plates (Corning, Corning,
NY, USA) were coated with a thin layer of 1% ultrapure agarose (Sigma-Aldrich), and
10,000 cells were seeded in each well in 200 μL DMEM high glucose medium supplemented
with 10% FBS and 1% PS and then incubated for 3 days. Cell growth, shape, and mor-
phology were analyzed on an inverted optical microscope (Nikon Eclipse, Tokyo, Japan),
following a protocol previously described [2].
3D cell cytoskeleton: Spheroids were washed with 0.01 M PBS and then fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde (PFA). The cell membrane was then permeabilized by incubation for 2 h
with 0.2% BSA + 0.1% Triton X-100 in 0.01 M PBS for 2 h at room temperature (RT). The
spheroids were washed three times with a blocking solution containing 50 nM NH4 Cl in
0.01 M PBS. Phalloidin solution (500 ng/mL, stock 1:40, ThermoFisher Lot: F432) diluted in
0.2% BSA + 0.1% Triton X-100 in 0.01 M PBS was then added and incubated for 2 h, and
later an additional 30 min with DAPI (1:500) (SIGMA-ALDRICH—Lot: 583-93-7). Cell
morphology was visualized using a confocal fluorescence microscope (DMI 6000, Leica,
Teaneck, NJ, USA).
NPs exposition: Both 2D and 3D cell cultures were exposed to 0, 5, and 100 μg/mL
TiO2 NPs suspended in incomplete osteogenic medium composed of DMEM supplemented
with 10% FBS, 50 μg/mL of ascorbic acid (Sigma), 100 Mm of β-glycerophosphate (Sigma),
and antibiotics for 3 and 21 days. Cells without TiO2 NPs treatment were used as control.
Cytotoxicity assay: After NPs exposition, the cells were washed three times with
0.01 M PBS and then incubated with 0.125% Trypsin (kept in a humidified incubator
with 5% CO2 , 37 ◦ C) for 5 min. Trypsin was blocked by adding culture medium with
10% FBS, and 2D adherent cells and 3D spheroids were mechanically dissociated. The cells
were centrifuged for 7 min at 500 x g (4 ◦ C), and the pellet was resuspended in 100 μL
annexin-binding buffer (Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit for Annexin V; Kit Life and Dead, Life
Technologies). The samples were incubated for 15 min (RT) in 3 μL annexin/fluorescein
(FITC) solution and 1 μL propidium iodide (according to the manufacturer’s instructions).
All analyses were performed in a flow cytometer (FACSAria III, BD Biosciences, Franklin
Lakes, NJ, USA).
Morphology analysis: Cells were washed with 0.01 M PBS and processed for scanning
(SEM) and transmission (TEM) electron microscopy. Briefly, cells were fixed using modified
Karnovsky (2% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer,
pH 7.2) for 2 h at RT and washed with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. The samples were post-
fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in cacodylate buffer (1:1) for 30 min in the dark, then
washed with cacodylate buffer and dehydrated in ethanol (VETEC—1567). Then, for
TEM analysis, samples were contrasted in a bloc with 1% of uranyl acetate, dehydrated
in acetone, and embedded in Spurr. Ultra-thin sections were also analyzed using EDS
in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) mode in a TITAN 80–300 electron
microscope (FEI, Netherlands (300 kV).
Alternatively, for SEM analysis, the cells were dried at a critical point (Autosamdri® -
815, Series A) and metalized with gold (in a current of 40 mA for 90 sec). The 2D cell
samples were analyzed in a scanning electron microscope (JEOL Field Emission Gun-JSM-
7401F) with an acceleration voltage of 1 kV. The 3D cells were analyzed under a helium
ion beam microscope (HIM) (Carl Zeiss Orion Nanofab—beam current of 0.8 pA, using an
electron flood gun to compensate for the positive charge).
Differentiation and analysis of the cell matrix: Cell differentiation was evaluated by
alkaline phosphatase histochemistry. The cells were cultured at different times (3, 7, and
21 days). The alkaline phosphatase labeling kit (Sigma-Aldrich Lot: APF-1KT) was used,
which is based on the application of 500 μL of diazonium and naphthol salt solution for
25
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
30 min in the dark. Afterward, the reaction was stopped with tridistilled water. Positive
cells marked in red were photographed under an inverted optical microscope (Nikon
Eclipse TS100), using the photo program (Leica Applications Suites—LAS EZ).
To evaluate the production of the mineralized matrix, alizarin red staining was per-
formed after 3, 7, and 21 days of culture. Cells were fixed with 4% PFA and exposed
to 1% alizarin red solution (Sigma-Aldrich) at RT for 30 min, then rinsed with ultrapure
water. To quantify matrix mineralization, alizarin red-positive nodules were dissolved in a
solution of 0.5 N HCl with 5% SDS. The optical density (OD) values of absorbance were
quantified spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 450 nm using a microplate reader
(Biotek Synergy 2 multi-mode detection with gen5 software).
Statistical analysis: Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The
Gaussian distribution of the samples was tested, and the statistical significance of the data
was evaluated using one-way ANOVA or unpaired t-tests. The p values are shown in the
figures and statistical significance was considered when p < 0.05. Each experiment was
performed three times, with triplicates.
3. Results
3.1. Characterization of TiO2 NPs
TiO2 NPs with a primary size of 25 nm were used to mimic the wear particles released
by dental implants. The physicochemical characterization of the primary TiO2 NPs was
already published [2,5]. TEM micrographs revealed that TiO2 NPs in ultrapure water were
agglomerated, requiring the implementation of a dispersion protocol (Figure 1A). Dark-
field STEM images show the morphology and agglomeration of TiO2 NPs after dispersion
(direct probe sonication), and the STEM/EDS Ti-K map (in blue) confirmed the identity
of the TiO2 NPs (Figure 1B). DLS analysis (Figure 1C) showed that the mean diameter
(DH (nm)) of the TiO2 NPs was 135 ± 24 nm in water and increased significantly (p < 0.05,
unpaired t-test) in cell culture medium (156 ± 14 nm), maintaining a polydispersion index
(PdI) of less than 0.2. Finally, the zeta potential analysis (ζ (mV)) in water and culture
medium showed a significant decrease in the zeta potential value after medium contact,
indicating the formation of protein and ionic corona on TiO2 NPs surface (p < 0.05, unpaired
t-test) (Figure 1C).
26
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
Figure 1. Characterization of TiO2 NPs: (A) Transmission electron micrographs (TEM) of TiO2 NPs in
ultrapure water without dispersion. (B) Dark-field STEM micrographs of TiO2 NPs after dispersion
in water and cell culture medium and STEM/EDS Ti-K map confirming titanium presence (in blue).
Scale bar: 100 nm. (C): Hydrodynamic diameter (DH (nm)) and polydispersity index (PDI) of TiO2
NPs after dispersion in ultrapure water and cell culture medium obtained by dynamic light scattering
(DLS) and analysis of surface charge by zeta potential of TiO2 NPs (ζ (mV)) in water and culture
medium. The results represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments
performed in triplicate of measurement (* p < 0.05 vs. TiO2 NPs in water).
Figure 2. Treatment of TiO2 NPs in 2D and 3D cultures of human osteoblasts (SAOS-2): (A) Phase
contrast micrograph of SAOS-2 in 2D with or without 100 μg/mL of exposition to TiO2 NPs for 72 h
(scale bar: 200 μm) (B) Spheroid cytoskeleton (3D), nucleus in blue (stained with DAPI) and the actin
filaments in red (stained for F-actin) (scale bar: 100 μm). (C) Phase contrast micrograph of SAOS-2 in
3D with or without 100 μg/mL of exposition to TiO2 NPs for 72 h (scale bar: 200 μm). (D) Average
diameter and volume of spheroids. The baseline condition was used as a control. The results are
representative images of three independent experiments.
27
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
Figure 3. Morphology of human osteoblasts (SAOS-2) cultured in 2D and 3D after exposure to TiO2
NPs: (A) Scanning electron micrographs showing SAOS-2 cultured in 2D and in spheroids (B) after
treatment with 100 μg/mL of TiO2 NPs for 3 days. (C) STEM/EDS Ti-K map analysis. Ti showed in
blue point interacting with cells. Control: cultivation without NPs. The results are representative
images of three independent experiments. (scale bar: 40 μm, 20 μm, 50 μm and 5 μm).
28
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
Figure 4. Viability of 2D and 3D human osteoblasts (SAOS-2): SAOS-2 were exposed to TiO2 NPs
(100 μg/mL) for 3 and 21 days and the PI/Annexin assay was performed by flow cytometry of cells in
(A) 2D and (B) 3D. The baseline condition was used as a control. The results are the mean ± standard
deviation of three independent experiments (no statistical difference).
3.5. Differentiation and Mineralization of Human Osteoblasts after Exposure to TiO2 NPs
To understand the influence of TiO2 NPs on the differentiation and mineralization
of both cell models (2D and 3D), analyses of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (differentiation
marker) and alizarin red (mineralization marker) were performed. For these analyses,
osteoblasts were cultured for up to 14 days, and two exposure concentrations (5 and
100 μg/mL) of TiO2 NPs were used. Previous data in human primary osteoblasts 2D
histochemical micrographs showed that the treatment of TiO2 NPs did not enhance the
labeling for ALP (marked in red) after 14 days of culture (Figure S1A). However, in the
mineralization analysis, there was a dose-dependent increase in alizarin staining after
14 days of treatment with 100 μg/mL (marked in intense red) compared to the control
(Figure S1B).
To compare differences in mineralization occurring in 2D and 3D models, we per-
formed alizarin staining after 3, 7, and 14 days after 5 μg/mL or 100 μg/mL TiO2 NPs
exposure in both models. Alizarin red results showed a significant dose-dependent in-
crease in mineralization at 14 days compared to the control, both in 2D (Figure 6A) and
3D (Figure 6B). Moreover, when treatment values are normalized by control values, the
mineralization increase is higher in the 3D model when compared with the 2D model,
suggesting that both models can present different results in the mineralization evaluation
(Figure 6C and representative images in Figure 6D).
29
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
Figure 5. Internalization of TiO2 NPs: Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs showing
TiO2 NPs internalization in human osteoblasts (SAOS-2) 72 h cultured: (A) control, cultured without
NPs or (B,C) treated with 100 μg/mL of TiO2 NPs (black arrow). The results are representative
images of three independent experiments. (scale bar: 1 μm, 2 μm, and 200 nm).
30
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
Figure 6. Mineralized matrix produced by human osteoblasts (SAOS-2) in 2D and 3D cells exposed
to TiO2 NPs (0, 5 and 100 μg/mL) during 3 and 14 days in osteogenic medium. Alizarin red
assay shows a dose-dependent matrix production in (A) 2D SAOS-2 model and (B) 3D SAOS-2
models. The graphics in (C) present a comparison between the inorganic matrix production on both
2D and 3D models at 14 days (final experimental time) normalized vs each control to show dose-
dependent mineralization fold increase in the different models. The results are average ± standard
deviation of three independent experiments * p < 0.05; (D) representative images obtained through
optical microscopy.
4. Discussion
Titanium is the main material employed in the dental implant industry, due to its high
mechanical strength, low elastic modulus, corrosion resistance, ductility, and biocompatibil-
ity [6,9]. However, tribocorrosion processes at the implant surface lead to accelerated bone
loss, compromising osseointegration, and increasing periprosthetic failure [2,5–9,23,24].
The hostile electrolytic environment (oxidation/reduction) together with mechanical action
at the interface enables the tribocorrosion phenomena [7,10]. As a consequence, degradation
products (released from implants) including metal ions, micrometric, and/or nanomet-
ric metallic debris (TiO2 NPs) can be internalized by cells in the bone niche, possibly
generating cytotoxic effects [6,9,10]. The adverse effects of TiO2 NPs vary widely in the
literature, which raises concern among authorities and physicians due to their high preva-
lence [5,10,17]. Literature data reveal that inflammatory stimuli associated with cytokine
overproduction and increased production of reactive oxygen species are referred to as
primary toxic effects that lead to cell death [6,9,13,17].
Some authors explained that this mechanism leads to activation of immunological
sentinels and accumulation of antigens such as ions, nanoparticles, microparticles, and
bacterial antigens via the functional interface between dental implant and tissue. This leads
to immunological cell polarization and follows dental implant loss [6,9].
Most available studies that evaluate osteoblast response to TiO2 NPs use 2D cell culture
models, which have shown limitations regarding cell growth and cell–cell and cell–matrix
interactions, among others [25–28]. Few studies evaluate the influence of TiO2 NPs on the
31
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
physiology of bone cells grown in 3D models such as spheroids [2]. Osteoblast spheroids
can be considered as a culture model that better mimics living cells in terms of structural and
biofunctional properties and provides more reliable results compared to conventional 2D
cell cultures (Figure 7) [2,25,29]. Despite this, there are some limitations to spheroid culture,
mainly because cellular environments are not similarly exposed to the culture medium.
This can lead to the formation of a microenvironment inside the spheroids that can select
groups of cells [30,31]. Partial diffusion of nutrients or oxygen can induce necrotic areas in
the central area of the spheroids [32]. However, well-characterized multicellular spheroids
exhibit different levels of extracellular matrix deposition, growth factor secretion, and gene
expression profiles [2]. The viability, morphology, and gene expression of osteoblastic
spheroids are contact-dependent, and single or co-culture spheroids have been shown to
have an impact on bone cell function [33]. Interestingly, a study reported that primary
osteoblasts and pre-osteoblasts MC3T3-E1 can differentiate into osteocytes when grown in
3D cultures [34]. Therefore, 3D culture models can be used to study the pathophysiological
reactions of TiO2 NPs in bone metabolism compared to 2D cultures. A previous study by W.
Souza et al., on the cytotoxicity effect of TiO2 NPs on osteoblast spheroids, revealed that 72 h
exposition to TiO2 NPs can alter the cell cycle, without interfering with osteoblasts’ ability
to differentiate and mineralize and significantly increase collagen and pro-inflammatory
cytokine secretion [2]. In the present study, a longer exposure period (21 days) was
assessed to compare 2D with 3D osteoblasts models to better understand their relevance
for nanotoxicological studies.
TiO2 NPs are chemically stable, have antibacterial properties, and induce less toxicity
than other nanostructures, and, when exposed to the biological environment, blood plasma
proteins and ions selectively adsorb on the outer surface of the cell [35]. The complex
interface depends on the physical and chemical characteristics of the NPs, as well as the
biological characteristics of the environment [36]. In the present study, we observed that
TiO2 NPs had an average size of 150 nm in the culture medium. We can notice an increase
in the average size after the addition of the culture medium due to the adsorption of
proteins and ions on the TiO2 NPs surface, which can be correlated with the change in
surface charge, identified by zeta potential analysis. Furthermore, in our previous study,
32
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
we confirmed the adsorption of calcium and phosphate on the surface of TiO2 NPs, which
are important mediators of bone mineralization [5].
To understand the influence of TiO2 NPs on bone cell mineralization, we used a
mature osteoblast line, cultured both in monolayer (2D) and spheroids (3D), the former
characterized previously [2]. Spheroids and monolayer cells were treated with 100 μg/mL
of NPs for 21 days. In both models (2D and 3D), we observed the internalization of TiO2 NPs
in membrane vesicles (with 72 h). Some studies have shown that NPs can be internalized
in a dose-dependent manner, accumulating preferentially in the perinuclear region, and
having as their final destination the lysosomes [35,37]. Normally TiO2 NPs are not observed
dispersed in cell cytoplasm [5,35,37]. However, the effect of TiO2 NPs on cells is directly
related to their size distribution, crystal structure, as well as corona formation [35]. Recently,
the formation of a bio-camouflage rich in calcium, phosphorus, and hydroxyapatite crystals
around TiO2 NPs was demonstrated, which is known to facilitate the internalization in 2D
and 3D osteoblastic models since the detected chemical elements are essential for bone cell
metabolism and mineralization [2,5,38].
The present study demonstrated that TiO2 NPs did not alter the viability of osteoblasts
in both cell models (with 21 days). Concomitantly, they did not change the osteoblast
morphology or spherical shape of the 3D model upon internalization of the NPs. Interest-
ingly, they were able to stimulate an increase in calcium deposition, which is indicative of
the activation of a mineralization process in osteoblastic spheroids. In the present study,
results of alkaline phosphatase synthesis and calcium labeling demonstrated that TiO2 NPs
increased osteoblast differentiation that induced greater mineralization in a 3D culture
model, suggesting that the 3D architecture possibly increases cell surface interaction with
previously reported TiO2 NPs bio-camouflaged [2]. The mineralization increase in 3D mod-
els after exposure to NPs may be related to the greater cell surface capable of contacting
NPs when compared to the monolayer (2D), enhancing the stimulatory effects of TiO2
NPs [39]. This is consistent with previous studies that reveal that 3D osteoblasts models
when exposed to TiO2 NPs, compared to monolayer cells, induce the secretion of vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF), activating a cascade of events resulting in higher type I
collagen production [39–43]. Bone mineralization is the first step for implant osseointegra-
tion and begins when collagen I acts as a three-dimensional scaffold for hydroxyapatite
deposition [44]. Another study reported greater osteogenic differentiation when using 3D
collagen gel culture [34]. Studies also showed that the 2D cell model does not yet seem to
be the better model to study interaction with NPs; instead, the spheroids are also promising
for application to 3D bioprinting tissue models with biomaterial scaffolds, as an innovative
technology to improve bone osteointegration [45].
Unfortunately, there is no consensus in the literature on how to evaluate the biological
effect of TiO2 NPs. Without standardized protocols to assess the biological impacts of NPs,
it is necessary to validate safe assessments and mitigate potential health impacts, moving
toward the evaluation and development of new cellular study models to better mimic
the biological environment [37]. Although osteoblastic spheroids have their advantages
compared to monolayers—such as reproducibility, better nutrients, oxygen diffusion gra-
dients, improved cell–cell interactions, matrix deposition, and models with various cell
stages (proliferating, quiescent, apoptotic, hypoxic, and necrotic cells) [46,47], 3D spheroid
models have not been validated as realistic in vitro models [29,46,48]. One of the main
drawbacks of spheroids is that the porosity and mechanical properties is difficult to be
studied. Thus, efforts should be made to improve 3D bone cell models to recapitulate the
bone microenvironment that is known to be constituted by different cell types and has
dynamic and metabolic activity.
TiO2 NPs released from dental implants are, on the one hand, considered the cause
of clinical peri-implant bone loss; on the other hand, they may be able to stimulate the
production of a mineralized extracellular matrix in osteoblast spheroids [48]. Another
important aspect is that spheroids can respond physiologically better to the stimuli of TiO2
NPs, which corroborates the development of new studies to create new models applied
33
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
in clinical studies, to favor the process of bone remodeling and alternative treatment for
periodontitis and peri-implantitis. In addition, the spheroids themselves can be applied to
high-cell-density tissue models, innovative technology for bone augmentation, and soft
tissue replacement procedures [45]. Therefore, the combination of TiO2 NPs with spheroid
cells should be an interesting approach for tissue reconstruction.
Lastly, our results demonstrate that TiO2 NPs increase calcium deposition in 3D versus
2D cultures. Although this study revealed interesting findings regarding the behavior and
role of TiO2 NPs in generating stimuli for mineralization in 3D models only, it should be
noticed that our results are limited to the conditions tested and the experimental setup.
Further studies should be encouraged, and further evaluations using the quantification of
genes that act on differentiation and mineralization should be performed. However, our
results help to better understand the possible impact of 3D culture in dentistry, and also
open a discussion about the dual role of TiO2 NPs, which on one side can activate an inflam-
matory response that leads to bone resorption. However, on the other hand, it is activating
mineralization. Our findings are considered clinically relevant, since, for the first time, we
report that at the bone-implant interface, TiO2 NPs besides the activation of macrophages
can also stimulate osteoblasts that play a fundamental role in the mineralization process.
5. Conclusions
In this study, the cells were exposed to TiO2 NPs at concentrations up to 100 μg/mL
in 2D and 3D models for up to 21 days of exposure.
TiO2 aggregates were dispersed to nanometric size and characterized successfully. Its
internalization in both cell models showed no differences in cell morphology or viability
and bone mineralization induction in a dose-dependent form in both culture models.
However, the mineralization process was more intense in the 3D spheroid culture
compared to the 2D monolayer model.
This brings a new discussion about the possible advantages of TiO2 NPs on bone
mineralization, which may suggest that the action of nanometric particles can contribute to
the osseointegration process in titanium dental implants, reducing periprosthetic failures
and using 3D cell models as an innovative technology to improve bone osteointegration
induced by nanoparticles.
Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://
www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13030425/s1, Figure S1. Primary osteoblast differentiation and
mineralization: alkaline phosphatase (A) and alizarin red (B) staining in primary human osteoblasts
exposed during 3, 7, and 14 days after exposure to 5 μg/mL or 100 μg/mL TiO2 NPs. The results are
representative images of three independent experiments. (scale bar: 200 μm).
Author Contributions: S.G.-P., A.R.R., W.d.S. and G.d.S.C. designed the study. G.d.S.C., W.d.S.,
S.G.-P., A.R.R., T.S.M.L. and J.W., performed experimental work and analyses. G.d.S.C., W.d.S.,
D.C.B., S.G.-P., A.R.R., J.W., J.M.G. and B.S.A. contributed technical support and discussion. G.d.S.C.,
W.d.S., S.G.-P., A.R.R., T.S.M.L., D.C.B. and J.M.G. wrote/edited the manuscript. All authors have
read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This work was supported by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
(CNPq) with grants 405030/2015-0, 306672/2016-2, and 467513/2014-7. J.M.G. thanks the Cientista do
Nosso Estado award from FAPERJ and CNPq/Faperj—National Institute of Science and Technology
in Regenerative Medicine (INCT-Regenera, process n. 465656/2014-5). A.R.R. thanks the Sinfonia
project H2020 of the European Union (N.857253).
Data Availability Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the
corresponding author upon reasonable request.
34
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
Acknowledgments: We thank the Physical Research Centre (CBPF), the National Institute of Metrol-
ogy, Quality and Technology (INMETRO), and the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ),
especially Maria Isabel Rossi, for all the support given to the biological experiments. The authors
thank Suzana Azevedo dos Anjos for her valuable help in carrying out the sample preparation for
SEM, and Mariana Moreira for her help in obtaining micrographs in SEM and TEM. The authors
thank the Cell Bank of Rio de Janeiro (BCRJ), especially Radovan Borojevic.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Awasthi, A.; Awasthi, K.K.; John, P.J. Nanomaterials in Biology. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 46334–46335. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
2. Souza, W.; Piperni, S.G.; Laviola, P.; Rossi, A.L.; Rossi, M.I.D.; Archanjo, B.S.; Leite, P.E.; Fernandes, M.H.; Rocha, L.A.; Granjeiro,
J.M.; et al. The Two Faces of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Bio-Camouflage in 3D Bone Spheroids. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9309.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Li, J.; Zhou, P.; Wang, L.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, S.; Guan, S. Investigation of Mg–XLi–Zn Alloys for Potential Application of
Biodegradable Bone Implant Materials. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2021, 32, 43. [CrossRef]
4. Bayda, S.; Adeel, M.; Tuccinardi, T.; Cordani, M.; Rizzolio, F. The History of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: From Chemical–
Physical Applications to Nanomedicine. Molecules 2019, 25, 112. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Ribeiro, A.R.; Gemini-Piperni, S.; Travassos, R.; Lemgruber, L.; Silva, C.R.; Rossi, A.L.; Farina, M.; Anselme, K.; Shokuhfar, T.;
Shahbazian-Yassar, R.; et al. Trojan-Like Internalization of Anatase Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles by Human Osteoblast Cells.
Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23615. [CrossRef]
6. Delgado-Ruiz, R.; Romanos, G. Potential Causes of Titanium Particle and Ion Release in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3585. [CrossRef]
7. Kheder, W.; al Kawas, S.; Khalaf, K.; Samsudin, A.R. Impact of Tribocorrosion and Titanium Particles Release on Dental Implant
Complications—A Narrative Review. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2021, 57, 182–189. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Kirmanidou, Y.; Sidira, M.; Drosou, M.-E.; Bennani, V.; Bakopoulou, A.; Tsouknidas, A.; Michailidis, N.; Michalakis, K. New
Ti-Alloys and Surface Modifications to Improve the Mechanical Properties and the Biological Response to Orthopedic and Dental
Implants: A Review. Biomed. Res. Int 2016, 2016, 2908570. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Amengual-Peñafiel, L.; Córdova, L.A.; Constanza Jara-Sepúlveda, M.; Brañes-Aroca, M.; Marchesani-Carrasco, F.; Cartes-
Velásquez, R. Osteoimmunology Drives Dental Implant Osseointegration: A New Paradigm for Implant Dentistry. Jpn. Dent. Sci.
Rev. 2021, 57, 12–19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Kim, K.T.; Eo, M.Y.; Nguyen, T.T.H.; Kim, S.M. General Review of Titanium Toxicity. Int. J. Implant. Dent. 2019, 5, 10. [CrossRef]
11. Romanos, G.; Fischer, G.; Delgado-Ruiz, R. Titanium Wear of Dental Implants from Placement, under Loading and Maintenance
Protocols. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1067. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Zhou, Z.; Shi, Q.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X. The Unfavorable Role of Titanium Particles Released from
Dental Implants. Nanotheranostics 2021, 5, 321–332. [CrossRef]
13. Christo, S.N.; Diener, K.R.; Bachhuka, A.; Vasilev, K.; Hayball, J.D. Innate Immunity and Biomaterials at the Nexus: Friends or
Foes. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 342304. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Goodman, S.B.; Davidson, J.A.; Song, Y.; Martial, N.; Fornasier, V.L. Histomorphological Reaction of Bone to Different Concentra-
tions of Phagocytosable Particles of High-Density Polyethylene and Ti-6Al-4V Alloy in Vivo. Biomaterials 1996, 17, 1943–1947.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Bukata, S.V.; Gelinas, J.; Wei, X.; Rosier, R.N.; Puzas, J.E.; Zhang, X.; Schwarz, E.M.; Song, X.R.; Griswold, D.E.; O’Keefe, R.J.
PGE2 and IL-6 Production by Fibroblasts in Response to Titanium Wear Debris Particles Is Mediated through a Cox-2 Dependent
Pathway. J. Orthop. Res. 2004, 22, 6–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Choi, M.G.; Koh, H.S.; Kluess, D.; O’Connor, D.; Mathur, A.; Truskey, G.A.; Rubin, J.; Zhou, D.X.F.; Sung, K.-L.P. Effects of
Titanium Particle Size on Osteoblast Functions in Vitro and in Vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 4578–4583. [CrossRef]
17. Tuan, R.S.; Lee, F.Y.-I.; Konttinen, Y.T.; Wilkinson, M.J.; Smith, R.L. What Are the Local and Systemic Biologic Reactions and
Mediators to Wear Debris, and What Host Factors Determine or Modulate the Biologic Response to Wear Particles? J. Am. Acad.
Orthop. Surg. 2008, 16, S42–S48. [CrossRef]
18. Gutwein, L.G.; Webster, T.J. Increased Viable Osteoblast Density in the Presence of Nanophase Compared to Conventional
Alumina and Titania Particles. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 4175–4183. [CrossRef]
19. Neel, A.; Bozec, L.; Perez, R.A.; Kim, H.-W.; Knowles, J.C. Nanotechnology in Dentistry: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Int.
J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 6371. [CrossRef]
20. Bédard, P.; Gauvin, S.; Ferland, K.; Caneparo, C.; Pellerin, È.; Chabaud, S.; Bolduc, S. Innovative Human Three-Dimensional
Tissue-Engineered Models as an Alternative to Animal Testing. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 115. [CrossRef]
35
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
21. Yanagi, T.; Kajiya, H.; Fujisaki, S.; Maeshiba, M.; Yanagi-S, A.; Yamamoto-M, N.; Kakura, K.; Kido, H.; Ohno, J. Three-Dimensional
Spheroids of Dedifferentiated Fat Cells Enhance Bone Regeneration. Regen. Ther. 2021, 18, 472–479. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Gaitán-Salvatella, I.; López-Villegas, E.O.; González-Alva, P.; Susate-Olmos, F.; Álvarez-Pérez, M.A. Case Report: Formation of
3D Osteoblast Spheroid Under Magnetic Levitation for Bone Tissue Engineering. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 672518. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
23. Schoichet, J.J.; Mourão, C.F.d.A.B.; Fonseca, E.d.M.; Ramirez, C.; Villas-Boas, R.; Prazeres, J.; Quinelato, V.; Aguiar, T.R.; Prado, M.;
Cardarelli, A.; et al. Epidermal Growth Factor Is Associated with Loss of Mucosae Sealing and Peri-Implant Mucositis: A Pilot
Study. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1277. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Romanos, G. Current Concepts in the Use of Lasers in Periodontal and Implant Dentistry. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2015, 19, 490.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Gebhard, C.; Gabriel, C.; Walter, I. Morphological and Immunohistochemical Characterization of Canine Osteosarcoma Spheroid
Cell Cultures. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 2016, 45, 219–230. [CrossRef]
26. Keller, L.; Idoux-Gillet, Y.; Wagner, Q.; Eap, S.; Brasse, D.; Schwinté, P.; Arruebo, M.; Benkirane-Jessel, N. Nanoengineered Implant
as a New Platform for Regenerative Nanomedicine Using 3D Well-Organized Human Cell Spheroids. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12,
447–457. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Maia-Pinto, M.O.C.; Brochado, A.C.B.; Teixeira, B.N.; Sartoretto, S.C.; Uzeda, M.J.; Alves, A.T.N.N.; Alves, G.G.; Calasans-Maia,
M.D.; Thiré, R.M.S.M. Biomimetic Mineralization on 3D Printed PLA Scaffolds: On the Response of Human Primary Osteoblasts
Spheroids and In Vivo Implantation. Polymers 2020, 13, 74. [CrossRef]
28. Jensen, C.; Teng, Y. Is It Time to Start Transitioning From 2D to 3D Cell Culture? Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 33. [CrossRef]
29. Duval, K.; Grover, H.; Han, L.-H.; Mou, Y.; Pegoraro, A.F.; Fredberg, J.; Chen, Z. Modeling Physiological Events in 2D vs. 3D Cell
Culture. Physiology 2017, 32, 266–277. [CrossRef]
30. Białkowska, K.; Komorowski, P.; Bryszewska, M.; Miłowska, K. Spheroids as a Type of Three-Dimensional Cell Cultures—
Examples of Methods of Preparation and the Most Important Application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6225. [CrossRef]
31. Holub, A.R.; Huo, A.; Patel, K.; Thakore, V.; Chhibber, P.; Erogbogbo, F. Assessing Advantages and Drawbacks of Rapidly
Generated Ultra-Large 3D Breast Cancer Spheroids: Studies with Chemotherapeutics and Nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21,
4413. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Anada, T.; Fukuda, J.; Sai, Y.; Suzuki, O. An Oxygen-Permeable Spheroid Culture System for the Prevention of Central Hypoxia
and Necrosis of Spheroids. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 8430–8441. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Yuste, I.; Luciano, F.C.; González-Burgos, E.; Lalatsa, A.; Serrano, D.R. Mimicking Bone Microenvironment: 2D and 3D in Vitro
Models of Human Osteoblasts. Pharmacol. Res. 2021, 169, 105626. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Sawa, N.; Fujimoto, H.; Sawa, Y.; Yamashita, J. Alternating Differentiation and Dedifferentiation between Mature Osteoblasts and
Osteocytes. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13842. [CrossRef]
35. Buzea, C.; Pacheco, I.I.; Robbie, K. Nanomaterials and Nanoparticles: Sources and Toxicity. Biointerphases 2007, 2, MR17–MR71.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Corbo, C.; Molinaro, R.; Parodi, A.; Toledano Furman, N.E.; Salvatore, F.; Tasciotti, E. The Impact of Nanoparticle Protein Corona
on Cytotoxicity, Immunotoxicity and Target Drug Delivery. Nanomedicine 2016, 11, 81–100. [CrossRef]
37. Arora, S.; Rajwade, J.M.; Paknikar, K.M. Nanotoxicology and in Vitro Studies: The Need of the Hour. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
2012, 258, 151–165. [CrossRef]
38. Ribeiro, A.R.; Mukherjee, A.; Hu, X.; Shafien, S.; Ghodsi, R.; He, K.; Gemini-Piperni, S.; Wang, C.; Klie, R.F.; Shokuhfar, T.;
et al. Bio-Camouflage of Anatase Nanoparticles Explored by in Situ High-Resolution Electron Microscopy. Nanoscale 2017, 9,
10684–10693. [CrossRef]
39. Gurumurthy, B.; Bierdeman, P.C.; Janorkar, A.V. Spheroid Model for Functional Osteogenic Evaluation of Human Adipose
Derived Stem Cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2017, 105, 1230–1236. [CrossRef]
40. Yamada, Y.; Okano, T.; Orita, K.; Makino, T.; Shima, F.; Nakamura, H. 3D-Cultured Small Size Adipose-Derived Stem Cell
Spheroids Promote Bone Regeneration in the Critical-Sized Bone Defect Rat Model. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022, 603,
57–62. [CrossRef]
41. Ho, S.S.; Murphy, K.C.; Binder, B.Y.K.; Vissers, C.B.; Leach, J.K. Increased Survival and Function of Mesenchymal Stem Cell
Spheroids Entrapped in Instructive Alginate Hydrogels. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016, 5, 773–781. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Cuevas-González, M.V.; Suaste-Olmos, F.; Cuevas-González, J.C.; Álvarez-Pérez, M.A. 3D Spheroid Cell Cultures and Their Role
in Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review. Odovtos Int. J. Dent. Sci. 2022, 24, 44–57. [CrossRef]
43. Lee, H.-J.; Song, Y.-M.; Baek, S.; Park, Y.-H.; Park, J.-B. Vitamin D Enhanced the Osteogenic Differentiation of Cell Spheroids
Composed of Bone Marrow Stem Cells. Medicina 2021, 57, 1271. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Rocha, A.L.; Bighetti-Trevisan, R.L.; Duffles, L.F.; de Arruda, J.A.A.; Taira, T.M.; Assis, B.R.D.; Macari, S.; Diniz, I.M.A.; Beloti,
M.M.; Rosa, A.L.; et al. Inhibitory Effects of Dabigatran Etexilate, a Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, on Osteoclasts and Osteoblasts.
Thromb. Res. 2020, 186, 45–53. [CrossRef]
45. Daly, A.C.; Davidson, M.D.; Burdick, J.A. 3D Bioprinting of High Cell-Density Heterogeneous Tissue Models through Spheroid
Fusion within Self-Healing Hydrogels. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 753. [CrossRef]
46. Kim, J. bin Three-Dimensional Tissue Culture Models in Cancer Biology. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005, 15, 365–377. [CrossRef]
36
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 425
47. Chatzinikolaidou, M. Cell Spheroids: The New Frontiers in in Vitro Models for Cancer Drug Validation. Drug Discov. Today 2016,
21, 1553–1560. [CrossRef]
48. Senna, P.; Antoninha Del Bel Cury, A.; Kates, S.; Meirelles, L. Surface Damage on Dental Implants with Release of Loose Particles
after Insertion into Bone. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2015, 17, 681–692. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
37
nanomaterials
Article
Different Sensitivity of Advanced Bronchial and Alveolar
Mono- and Coculture Models for Hazard Assessment
of Nanomaterials
Elisabeth Elje 1,2, *, Espen Mariussen 1,3 , Erin McFadden 1 , Maria Dusinska 1 and Elise Rundén-Pran 1, *
1 Health Effects Laboratory, Department for Environmental Chemistry, NILU—Norwegian Institute for Air
Research, 2007 Kjeller, Norway
2 Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway
3 Department of Air Quality and Noise, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0456 Oslo, Norway
* Correspondence: [email protected] (E.E.); [email protected] (E.R.-P.); Tel.: +47-63-89-81-98 (E.E.)
Abstract: For the next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) of chemicals and nanomaterials, new
approach methodologies (NAMs) are needed for hazard assessment in compliance with the 3R’s
to reduce, replace and refine animal experiments. This study aimed to establish and characterize
an advanced respiratory model consisting of human epithelial bronchial BEAS-2B cells cultivated
at the air–liquid interface (ALI), both as monocultures and in cocultures with human endothelial
EA.hy926 cells. The performance of the bronchial models was compared to a commonly used alveolar
model consisting of A549 in monoculture and in coculture with EA.hy926 cells. The cells were
exposed at the ALI to nanosilver (NM-300K) in the VITROCELL® Cloud. After 24 h, cellular viability
(alamarBlue assay), inflammatory response (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), DNA damage
(enzyme-modified comet assay), and chromosomal damage (cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay)
were measured. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity induced by NM-300K were dependent on both the
cell types and model, where BEAS-2B in monocultures had the highest sensitivity in terms of cell
viability and DNA strand breaks. This study indicates that the four ALI lung models have different
Citation: Elje, E.; Mariussen, E.; sensitivities to NM-300K exposure and brings important knowledge for the further development
McFadden, E.; Dusinska, M.; of advanced 3D respiratory in vitro models for the most reliable human hazard assessment based
Rundén-Pran, E. Different Sensitivity on NAMs.
of Advanced Bronchial and Alveolar
Mono- and Coculture Models for Keywords: NAMs—new approach methodologies; ALI—air–liquid interface; genotoxicity; BEAS-2B;
Hazard Assessment of
A549; NM-300K; DNA damage; chromosomal damage; cytokines
Nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 2023,
13, 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/
nano13030407
exposure to gold NMs [3,4]. Translocation of silver NMs has been seen in in vivo studies in
rodents [5].
In order to comply with the 3R´s principle to reduce, refine and replace animal
experiments, new advanced in vitro models are developed to better simulate the complexity
of human lungs. Reliable in vitro models of the airway system are of critical importance
for the risk assessment and governance of NMs and other environmental pollutants [6,7].
Human cells cultured on a microporous membrane at the air–liquid interface (ALI) with cell
culture medium only at the basolateral side, represent a highly relevant model for inhalation
toxicity studies [8]. Human lung cell lines such as A549 and BEAS-2B are commonly used as
model cells in respiratory toxicology. A549 cells are alveolar type-II carcinoma cells, while
BEAS-2B cells are immortalized cells from normal human bronchial epithelia. Both A549
and BEAS-2B cells form monolayers when cultivated at the ALI [9,10]. In order to further
advance the models, cocultures with other cell types, such as macrophages, dendritic cells,
or endothelial cells, can be established. The ALI exposure model aims to better mimic the
physiology of the respiratory system and is regarded as a more relevant in vitro model
compared to submerged exposure. Aerosolized exposure to the particles on top of the cells
introduces less changes in the physicochemical properties of the test substance compared
with submerged exposure [8].
Inhalation exposure to NMs, PM or other compounds may lead to adverse human
effects. Genotoxicity is a critical endpoint in the hazard assessment of chemicals, including
NMs, and should be assessed both at the level of DNA/genes and chromosomes. The
comet assay is a widely used assay for determining DNA damage as DNA strand breaks
(SBs), and as oxidized or alkylated bases by the inclusion of a repair enzyme such as
formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg) [11]. For the detection of chromosomal
damage, the most-used test is the micronucleus assay (OECD test guideline 487), which
detects the formation of micronuclei from chromosomes, chromatid fragments or whole
chromosomes that lag behind in cell division [12,13]. So far, a very limited number of
studies have addressed several genotoxicity endpoints in ALI models. Our approach,
combining advanced and more physiologically relevant in vitro respiratory models and
exposure systems with genotoxicity testing (by both comet and micronucleus assays), will
support the hazard characterization of NMs for risk assessment and safe use.
NMs can induce DNA damage by direct contact with DNA, or indirectly via NM-
induced oxidative stress or intermediate molecules and processes in cells (primary genotox-
icity). Secondary genotoxicity can be driven by an inflammatory response [14]. The airway
epithelium is an integrated part of the inflammatory defense response after inhalation ex-
posure to toxicants. Pro-inflammatory cytokines are considered biomarkers of NM-induced
toxicity and can be linked with adverse effects. The pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and
IL-8 are among the cytokines predominately secreted by monocytes, and both are coupled
to lung injury and considered biomarkers of lung disease [15–17]. IL-8 can also act as a
chemokine [17]. The bronchial epithelium serves as a first-line defense system against
inhaled pathogens mainly by the release of chemokines, such as IL-8 [18]. The cytokines
IL-6 and IL-8 have been shown to be secreted by airway epithelial, including BEAS-2B cells,
and endothelial cells and be involved in lung inflammation responses [18–21]. IL-6 has
been shown to be released from BEAS-2B cells after exposure to particulate matter below 1
μm in size (PM1), and both IL-6 and IL-8 were induced in BEAS-2B cells after exposure to
the PM2.5 fraction [22,23]. Endothelial EA.hy926 cells were shown to release IL-6 and IL-8
after exposure to silica NMs [19].
The A549 cell line has frequently been used in coculture lung models and has been
shown to be useful in a range of applications for hazard assessment of NMs [24–35].
The non-cancerous origin of BEAS-2B cells may make the cell line more relevant for use
in risk governance of NMs, particularly as a bronchial respiratory model. Coculture
models with BEAS-2B in ALI conditions for hazard assessment are, however, much less
characterized than those with A549. The main aim of this study was to characterize
an advanced respiratory model with BEAS-2B bronchial cells cultivated in ALI models,
40
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 407
after exposure to an aerosolized reference silver NM, NM-300K. The cells were cultivated
both as monocultures and in cocultures with human endothelial EA.hy926 cells. Cells
from ALI cultures were analyzed for cytokine secretion, cytotoxicity, barrier integrity,
DNA damage by the comet assay and chromosomal damage by the cytokinesis-block
micronucleus assay. Importantly, the responses obtained with the bronchial BEAS-2B model
were compared with the A549 alveolar model. The experimental design brilliantly allows
for the comprehensive analysis of several endpoints from the same sample, facilitating
increased throughput, better comparability, reduced costs, and sustainability by design to
support the development of new approach methodologies (NAMs) and next-generation
risk assessment (NGRA) of NMs.
Figure 1. Experimental design for the four different respiratory models exposed at the air–liquid
interface (ALI) in the VITROCELL® Cloud system. Created with BioRender.com.
41
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 407
2.2. Nanomaterials
The Ag NM NM-300K is listed on the representative manufactured NMs list of the
European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC, Brussels, Belgium) and was selected
for this study based on its toxicity in our previous work [36–39]. NM-300K was provided
by the Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (Schmallenberg,
Germany). NM-300K is a silver colloidal dispersion with a nominal silver content of 10%
w/w. The NMs were dispersed in an aqueous solution with stabilizing agents, consisting
of 4% w/w each of polyoxyethylene glycerol trioleate and polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan
mono-laurate (Tween 20). The pristine diameter of NM-300K is about 15 nm, and the size
distribution is narrow, where >99% of particles (by number) have a size below 20 nm. A
second peak of smaller NMs of about 5 nm has also been reported. The majority of the
NMs have a spherical shape [40].
Dispersed NMs were received in vials of approximately 2.0 g each, sealed under argon.
The vials were stored at room temperature (RT) in the dark before use. The dispersion
medium, NM-300K DIS, contained the aqueous solution with stabilizing agents at the same
concentrations as NM-300K, but without Ag. This was used as a solvent control.
42
Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 407
(version 2.0.0.98, Malvern Panalytical Ltd.), using general purpose model, refractive index
1.59 and absorption 0.01.
Measurement of size distribution of NMs diluted in culture medium was performed
directly after preparation and after 24 h incubation at 37 ◦ C, 5% CO2 . First, the stock
dispersion was vortexed, and mixed with serum-free LHC-9 medium (article no. 12680013,
ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to give the highest tested concentration
(141 μg/mL or 100 μg/cm2 in submerged exposure). Then, the sample was diluted 1:10
in sterile filtered MilliQ water, transferred to a disposable cuvette and measured as de-
scribed above.
Results were presented as Z-average (Z-ave), which is the intensity-weighted mean
hydrodynamic size of the ensemble collection of particles, the polydispersity index (PDI),
and hydrodynamic diameter (by intensity) of individual peaks in the size distributions.
For zeta potential analysis, the NM stock dispersion was vortexed and diluted 1:100 in
sterile filtered MilliQ water, and 1 mL dispersion was transferred to a pre-wetted disposable
folded capillary cell (DTS1070). The zeta potential was measured at 25 ◦ C using mixed-
mode measurement phase analysis light scattering (M3-PALS).
43
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
että tästä päästä saatettiin pistää sisään vihkimäsormuksia y.m., joita
tahdottiin siten vihkiä ja tehdä onnea tuottaviksi.
Vaan kun kerran päivän kaari taasen taivolle kohosi, maa oli
merestä noussut, veestä manner maatunnunna, ulapalle outo
saari, aalloille nimetön niemi.
———
———
—————
Tämmöinen on tarina.
Suomen suurin pyhimys oli Pyhä Henrikki. Lähinnä häntä oli Olavi.
Hän oli aikanaan pohjolan yhteinen pyhimys, jonka jäännösten luo
Norjan Nidarosiin Suomestakin tehtiin toivioretkiä ja jolle täällä
monet kirkot oli pyhitetty.
Ilma oli ihana ja aurinko paistoi kirkkaasti. Mutta kun taistelu alkoi,
tuli punerrus taivaalle ja auringon eteen ja vähän aikaa oli niin pimeä
kuin yöllä. Olavi kuningas oli koonnut miehensä kukkulalle, ja he
hyökkäsivät talonpoikain kimppuun niin rajusti, että näiden rintama
taipui niin, että kuninkaan joukon rintama oli siinä, missä
talonpoikain viimeiset miehet olivat seisoneet. Taistelu oli ankara.
Kuningas kävi itse rajusti käsikahakkaan. Hän iski Torea
olkapääähän, mutta miekka ei purrut. Hän oli eräällä retkellään
lappalaisten luo teettänyt itselleen ja miehilleen poronnahkaturkit,
siten loihditut, että aseet purivat niihin vähemmän kuin rautapaitaan.
Oli vain niin kuin olisi pöly suitsunnut poronturkista. Tästä laulaa
runoniekka:
Kun taistelu oli päättynyt, meni Tore Hund kuninkaan ruumiin luo,
hoiti sitä, laskien sen maahan, oikoen jäsenet ja levittäen vaatteen
sen yli. Kun hän pyyhki veren kuninkaan kasvoista, olivat ne niin
ihanat, että posket punoittivat, niinkuin hän olisi nukkunut, mutta
paljoa helakammin kuin ennen hänen eläessään. Kuninkaan verta
sattui Toren käteen ja sitä juoksi ranteen yli, jossa oli haava, eikä
siihen enää tarvittu mitään sidettä, niin pian se parani. Tore itse
todisti tämän, kun kuningas Olavin pyhyys tuli kaiken kansan tietoon,
ja hän oli kaikista kuningasta vastaan olleista suurmiehistä
ensimäinen todistamaan hänen pyhyyttään. Illan tultua kantoi
muuan talonpoika poikineen vainajan ruumiin autioon majaan, pesi
sen, kääri liinoihin ja kätki oksien alle. Yöllä haki majasta suojaa
sokea mies. Siinä haparoidessaan tunsi hän jotain kosteata
sormissaan ja kun hän sattumalta kosketti niillä silmäluomiaan, sai
hän yhtäkkiä näkönsä. Olavin viaton veri oli saanut aikaan tämän
ihmeen.
(Juhani Aho.)
TARINA TURUN SYNNYSTÄ.
— Eivät.
— Rakastavatko he sinua?
Kun Jeesus sen lähteen vedellä oli miehen puhtaaksi pessyt, sanoi
mies:
ebookbell.com