Advanced Engineering Cementitious Composites and Concrete Sustainability Dumitru Doru Burduhos Nergis PDF Download
Advanced Engineering Cementitious Composites and Concrete Sustainability Dumitru Doru Burduhos Nergis PDF Download
https://ebookbell.com/product/advanced-engineering-cementitious-
composites-and-concrete-sustainability-dumitru-doru-burduhos-
nergis-54692106
https://ebookbell.com/product/advanced-engineering-dynamics-second-
edition-2nd-ed-instructor-solution-manual-solutions-2nd-edition-jerry-
ginsberg-45107890
https://ebookbell.com/product/advanced-engineering-mathematics-with-
mathematica-edward-b-magrab-46249290
https://ebookbell.com/product/advanced-engineering-mathematics-and-
analysis-rami-a-maher-46706756
https://ebookbell.com/product/advanced-engineering-mathematics-and-
analysis-volume-2-rami-a-maher-47127740
Advanced Engineering Of Materials Through Lasers J Radhakrishnan
https://ebookbell.com/product/advanced-engineering-of-materials-
through-lasers-j-radhakrishnan-47205476
https://ebookbell.com/product/advanced-engineering-mathematics-5th-
edition-ka-stroud-dexter-j-booth-48909946
https://ebookbell.com/product/advanced-engineering-optimization-
through-intelligent-techniques-select-proceedings-of-
aeotit-2022-ravipudi-venkata-rao-49470016
https://ebookbell.com/product/advanced-engineering-thermodynamics-4th-
edition-adrian-bejan-49493056
https://ebookbell.com/product/advanced-engineering-
mathematics-10-erwin-kreyszig-50196018
Special Issue Reprint
Advanced Engineering
Cementitious Composites
and Concrete Sustainability
Edited by
Dumitru Doru Burduhos Nergis
www.mdpi.com/journal/materials
Advanced Engineering Cementitious
Composites and Concrete
Sustainability
Advanced Engineering Cementitious
Composites and Concrete
Sustainability
Editor
Dumitru Doru Burduhos Nergis
MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin
Editor
Dumitru Doru Burduhos
Nergis
Faculty of Materials Science
and Engineering
”Gheorghe Asachi” Technical
University
Iasi
Romania
Editorial Office
MDPI
St. Alban-Anlage 66
4052 Basel, Switzerland
This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Materials
(ISSN 1996-1944) (available at: www.mdpi.com/journal/materials/special issues/Cem Compos
Concr Sustain).
For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as
indicated below:
LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Volume Number,
Page Range.
© 2023 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative
Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon
published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum
dissemination and a wider impact of our publications.
The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons
license CC BY-NC-ND.
Contents
Allice Tan Mun Yin, Shayfull Zamree Abd Rahim, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah, Marcin
Nabialek, Abdellah El-hadj Abdellah and Allan Rennie et al.
Potential of New Sustainable Green Geopolymer Metal Composite (GGMC) Material as Mould
Insert for Rapid Tooling (RT) in Injection Moulding Process
Reprinted from: Materials 2023, 16, 1724, doi:10.3390/ma16041724 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Zhishuan Lv, Yang Han, Guoqi Han, Xueyu Ge and Hao Wang
Experimental Study on Toughness of Engineered Cementitious Composites with Desert Sand
Reprinted from: Materials 2023, 16, 697, doi:10.3390/ma16020697 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Muhd Hafizuddin Yazid, Meor Ahmad Faris, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah, Muhammad
Shazril I. Ibrahim, Rafiza Abdul Razak and Dumitru Doru Burduhos Nergis et al.
Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Incorporation Nylon66 Fiber
Reprinted from: Materials 2022, 15, 9050, doi:10.3390/ma15249050 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Ali İhsan Çelik, Yasin Onuralp Özkılıç, Özer Zeybek, Memduh Karalar, Shaker Qaidi and
Jawad Ahmad et al.
Mechanical Behavior of Crushed Waste Glass as Replacement of Aggregates
Reprinted from: Materials 2022, 15, 8093, doi:10.3390/ma15228093 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
Moslih Amer Salih, Shamil Kamil Ahmed, Shaymaa Alsafi, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abullah,
Ramadhansyah Putra Jaya and Shayfull Zamree Abd Rahim et al.
Strength and Durability of Sustainable Self-Consolidating Concrete with High Levels of
Supplementary Cementitious Materials
Reprinted from: Materials 2022, 15, 7991, doi:10.3390/ma15227991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Nurul Aida Mohd Mortar, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah, Rafiza Abdul Razak, Shayfull
Zamree Abd Rahim, Ikmal Hakem Aziz and Marcin Nabiałek et al.
Geopolymer Ceramic Application: A Review on Mix Design, Properties and Reinforcement
Enhancement
Reprinted from: Materials 2022, 15, 7567, doi:10.3390/ma15217567 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
Özer Zeybek, Yasin Onuralp Özkılıç, Memduh Karalar, Ali İhsan Çelik, Shaker Qaidi and
Jawad Ahmad et al.
Influence of Replacing Cement with Waste Glass on Mechanical Properties of Concrete
Reprinted from: Materials 2022, 15, 7513, doi:10.3390/ma15217513 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
Kaffayatullah Khan, Muhammad Arif Aziz, Mukarram Zubair and Muhammad Nasir Amin
Biochar Produced from Saudi Agriculture Waste as a Cement Additive for Improved
Mechanical and Durability Properties—SWOT Analysis and Techno-Economic Assessment
Reprinted from: Materials 2022, 15, 5345, doi:10.3390/ma15155345 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
v
Dickson Ling Chuan Hao, Rafiza Abd Razak, Marwan Kheimi, Zarina Yahya, Mohd Mustafa
Al Bakri Abdullah and Dumitru Doru Burduhos Nergis et al.
Artificial Lightweight Aggregates Made from Pozzolanic Material: A Review on the Method,
Physical and Mechanical Properties, Thermal and Microstructure
Reprinted from: Materials 2022, 15, 3929, doi:10.3390/ma15113929 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
Muhammad Nasir Amin, Waqas Ahmad, Kaffayatullah Khan and Mohamed Mahmoud
Sayed
Mapping Research Knowledge on Rice Husk Ash Application in Concrete: A Scientometric
Review
Reprinted from: Materials 2022, 15, 3431, doi:10.3390/ma15103431 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
Marwan Kheimi, Ikmal Hakem Aziz, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah, Mohammad
Almadani and Rafiza Abd Razak
Waste Material via Geopolymerization for Heavy-Duty Application: A Review
Reprinted from: Materials 2022, 15, 3205, doi:10.3390/ma15093205 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
Kaffayatullah Khan, Muhammad Ishfaq, Muhammad Nasir Amin, Khan Shahzada, Nauman
Wahab and Muhammad Iftikhar Faraz
Evaluation of Mechanical and Microstructural Properties and Global Warming Potential of
Green Concrete with Wheat Straw Ash and Silica Fume
Reprinted from: Materials 2022, 15, 3177, doi:10.3390/ma15093177 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257
Mohd Izrul Izwan Ramli, Mohd Arif Anuar Mohd Salleh, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah,
Ikmal Hakem Aziz, Tan Chi Ying and Noor Fifinatasha Shahedan et al.
The Influence of Sintering Temperature on the Pore Structure of an Alkali-Activated
Kaolin-Based Geopolymer Ceramic
Reprinted from: Materials 2022, 15, 2667, doi:10.3390/ma15072667 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
Dumitru Doru Burduhos Nergis, Petrica Vizureanu, Andrei Victor Sandu, Diana Petronela
Burduhos Nergis and Costica Bejinariu
XRD and TG-DTA Study of New Phosphate-Based Geopolymers with Coal Ash or Metakaolin
as Aluminosilicate Source and Mine Tailings Addition
Reprinted from: Materials 2021, 15, 202, doi:10.3390/ma15010202 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
Zarina Yahya, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah, Long-yuan Li, Dumitru Doru Burduhos
Nergis, Muhammad Aiman Asyraf Zainal Hakimi and Andrei Victor Sandu et al.
Behavior of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash through Underwater Placement
Reprinted from: Materials 2021, 14, 6865, doi:10.3390/ma14226865 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
vi
materials
Editorial
Special Issue “Advanced Engineering Cementitious Composites
and Concrete Sustainability”
Dumitru Doru Burduhos-Nergis
Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania;
[email protected]
Concrete, one of the most often-used building materials today, is the cornerstone of
modern buildings all over the world, being used for foundations, pavements, building
walls, architectural structures, highways, bridges, overpasses, and so on. Because of its
adaptability, concrete may be found in practically every construction, in some form or
another. Yet, the diverse nature of its components, their combinations, and their doses
result in a very wide range of concrete kinds with varying properties. As a result, concrete
is a material that is always evolving and is popular even now, especially when it comes to
circular economy.
Other ways of concrete manufacturing are now being researched to lessen or remove
the limits of this material, which are connected to its brittleness and poor environmental
effects. As a result, the development of engineering cementitious composites has resulted
in a significant reduction in flexibility issues, while the introduction of new additives and
the optimization of the manufacturing process has resulted in a significant reduction in
the negative effects of virgin raw material exploitation. In-depth research is still required
to optimize and increase the sustainability of these advanced engineering cementitious
composites or alternative concretes.
In this Special Issue (SI), state-of-the-art research and review articles on the emerging
material systems for AM are collected, with a focus on the process–structure–properties
relationships. In total, eleven research papers and six reviews have been collected. Con-
sidering the high interest in this field for finding alternatives for virgin raw materials, in
the research article conducted by Lv, Z. et al. [1], an interesting experimental study was
conducted on the effect of replacing ordinary sand with desert sand on the obtainment and
Citation: Burduhos-Nergis, D.D. characterization of engineered cementitious materials. Additionally, A. İ. Çelik et al. [2]
Special Issue “Advanced Engineering
observed that a 20% replacement of fine aggregates and coarse aggregates with recycled
Cementitious Composites and
crushed glass resulted in a significant increase in the mechanical properties of concrete. In
Concrete Sustainability”. Materials
another study, Ö. Zeybek et al. [3] evaluated the effect of replacing cement with fine glass
2023, 16, 2582. https://
microparticles on the tensile and flexural strengths of concrete, and showed that a 10%
doi.org/10.3390/ma16072582
replacement would result in better mechanical properties. Burduhos Nergis, D.D. et al. [4]
Received: 15 March 2023 evaluated the possibility of obtaining acid-activated geopolymers, using mine tailings
Accepted: 19 March 2023 as a substitute for fine aggregates. In their article, M.I.I. Ramli et al. [5] aimed to obtain
Published: 24 March 2023 alkali-activated ceramics and determined the influence of high curing temperatures on the
morphology of kaolin-based geopolymers. To improve the main characteristics of these
cementitious composites, some researchers designed and obtained engineered materials by
integrating different types of reinforcing elements, or by involving advanced techniques
Copyright: © 2023 by the author.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
to characterize them. M.H. Yazid et al. [6] obtained geopolymer concrete with improved
This article is an open access article
mechanical performances and water absorption by introducing low amounts of diamond-
distributed under the terms and shaped nylon66 fibers. M.A. Salih et al. [7] incorporated high amounts of supplementary
conditions of the Creative Commons cementitious materials, such as fly ash, ground-granulated blast furnace slag, and microsil-
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// ica, into self-consolidating concrete, in order to improve the durability and properties of
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ fresh and cured Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC)-based concrete. Z. Yahya et al. [8] devel-
4.0/). oped another self-consolidating concrete for underwater structures and showed that a class
1
Materials 2023, 16, 2582
C fly ash, activated with a mixture of sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide, could achieve
more than 70 MPa when cured in seawater, river water, or lake water. K. Khan et al. [9]
showed that ecofriendly concrete could be obtained by replacing OPC with wheat straw
ash and/or silica fume. According to their study, this differently engineered composition
could achieve better mechanical performances at lower CO2 -eq. In another study, K. Khan
et al. [10] showed that biochar could be used to obtain advanced concrete by performing a
SWOT analysis and a techno-economic assessment on the introduction of this by-product
as substitute for OPC. Because concrete durability is difficult to assess, particularly for in
situ applications, B. Bolborea et al. [11] conducted an experimental investigation on the
forecasting of the mechanical properties of concrete, using a non-destructive approach,
namely ultrasonic pulse velocity.
In the review articles published in this SI, A.T.M. Yin et al. [12] discussed the potential
of producing mold inserts for rapid tooling, using geopolymer composites that were rein-
forced with recycled metal particles, while N.A.M. Mortar [13] conducted a comprehensive
literature analysis on the obtainment and characterization of kaolin-based geopolymers for
ceramic applications. R. Martínez-García et al. [14] reviewed the recent developments of
the effect produced by the addition of waste wood ash on the composition of different types
of concrete. D.L.C. Hao et al. [15] assessed the previous studies on the characterization of
artificial aggregates that were manufactured by sintering, cold bonding, or autoclaving, and
concluded that the last two methods were suitable for producing lightweight aggregates
for industrial use. M. Kheimi et al. [16] presented an overview of the research that was
conducted on the parameters that influence the performances of geopolymers that are
used in heavy-duty applications, and observed that the mixing design, curing conditions,
alkali activator, and binder type are the key factors that define the properties of the final
product. A scientometric analysis, considering the publications that are indexed in the
Scopus database, was conducted by M.N. Amin et al. [17], in order to establish the statical
overview and mapping of the research on rice husk ash utilization in concrete compositions.
According to their study, despite the high number of papers published in this field, the
lack of standardization in the preparation, process, and use of geopolymers, is the main
limitation toward the industrial use of this material.
References
1. Lv, Z.; Han, Y.; Han, G.; Ge, X.; Wang, H. Experimental Study on Toughness of Engineered Cementitious Composites with Desert
Sand. Materials 2023, 16, 697. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Çelik, A.İ.; Özkılıç, Y.O.; Zeybek, Ö.; Karalar, M.; Qaidi, S.; Ahmad, J.; Burduhos-Nergis, D.D.; Bejinariu, C. Mechanical Behavior
of Crushed Waste Glass as Replacement of Aggregates. Materials 2022, 15, 8093. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Zeybek, Ö.; Özkılıç, Y.O.; Karalar, M.; Çelik, A.İ.; Qaidi, S.; Ahmad, J.; Burduhos-Nergis, D.D.; Burduhos-Nergis, D.P. Influence of
Replacing Cement with Waste Glass on Mechanical Properties of Concrete. Materials 2022, 15, 7513. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Burduhos-Nergis, D.D.; Vizureanu, P.; Sandu, A.V.; Burduhos-Nergis, D.P.; Bejinariu, C. XRD and TG-DTA Study of New
Phosphate-Based Geopolymers with Coal Ash or Metakaolin as Aluminosilicate Source and Mine Tailings Addition. Materials
2022, 15, 202. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Ramli, M.I.I.; Salleh, M.A.A.M.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Aziz, I.H.; Ying, T.C.; Shahedan, N.F.; Kockelmann, W.; Fedrigo, A.; Sandu,
A.V.; Vizureanu, P.; et al. The Influence of Sintering Temperature on the Pore Structure of an Alkali-Activated Kaolin-Based
Geopolymer Ceramic. Materials 2022, 15, 2667. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Yazid, M.H.; Faris, M.A.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Ibrahim, M.S.I.; Razak, R.A.; Burduhos Nergis, D.D.; Burduhos Nergis, D.P.;
Benjeddou, O.; Nguyen, K.S. Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Incorporation Nylon66 Fiber.
Materials 2022, 15, 9050. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Salih, M.A.; Ahmed, S.K.; Alsafi, S.; Abullah, M.M.A.B.; Jaya, R.P.; Abd Rahim, S.Z.; Aziz, I.H.; Thanaya, I.N.A. Strength and
Durability of Sustainable Self-Consolidating Concrete with High Levels of Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Materials
2022, 15, 7991. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Yahya, Z.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Li, L.Y.; Nergis, D.D.B.; Hakimi, M.A.A.Z.; Sandu, A.V.; Vizureanu, P.; Razak, R.A. Behavior of
Alkali-Activated Fly Ash through Underwater Placement. Materials 2021, 14, 6865. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2
Materials 2023, 16, 2582
9. Khan, K.; Ishfaq, M.; Amin, M.N.; Shahzada, K.; Wahab, N.; Faraz, M.I. Evaluation of Mechanical and Microstructural Properties
and Global Warming Potential of Green Concrete with Wheat Straw Ash and Silica Fume. Materials 2022, 15, 3177. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
10. Khan, K.; Aziz, M.A.; Zubair, M.; Amin, M.N. Biochar Produced from Saudi Agriculture Waste as a Cement Additive for
Improved Mechanical and Durability Properties—SWOT Analysis and Techno-Economic Assessment. Materials 2022, 15,
5345. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Bolborea, B.; Baera, C.; Dan, S.; Gruin, A.; Burduhos-Nergis, D.D.; Vasile, V. Concrete Compressive Strength by Means of
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Moduli of Elasticity. Materials 2021, 14, 7018. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Yin, A.T.M.; Rahim, S.Z.A.; Al Bakri Abdullah, M.M.; Nabialek, M.; Abdellah, A.E.; Rennie, A.; Tahir, M.F.M.; Titu, A.M. Potential
of New Sustainable Green Geopolymer Metal Composite (GGMC) Material as Mould Insert for Rapid Tooling (RT) in Injection
Moulding Process. Materials 2023, 16, 1724. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Mohd Mortar, N.A.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Abdul Razak, R.; Abd Rahim, S.Z.; Aziz, I.H.; Nabiałek, M.; Jaya, R.P.; Semenescu,
A.; Mohamed, R.; Ghazali, M.F. Geopolymer Ceramic Application: A Review on Mix Design, Properties and Reinforcement
Enhancement. Materials 2022, 15, 7567. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Martínez-García, R.; Jagadesh, P.; Zaid, O.; S, erbănoiu, A.A.; Fraile-Fernández, F.J.; de Prado-Gil, J.; Qaidi, S.M.A.; Grădinaru, C.M.
The Present State of the Use of Waste Wood Ash as an Eco-Efficient Construction Material: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 5349.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Hao, D.L.C.; Razak, R.A.; Kheimi, M.; Yahya, Z.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Nergis, D.D.B.; Fansuri, H.; Ediati, R.; Mohamed,
R.; Abdullah, A. Artificial Lightweight Aggregates Made from Pozzolanic Material: A Review on the Method, Physical and
Mechanical Properties, Thermal and Microstructure. Materials 2022, 15, 3929. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Kheimi, M.; Aziz, I.H.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Almadani, M.; Razak, R.A. Waste Material via Geopolymerization for Heavy-Duty
Application: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 3205. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Amin, M.N.; Ahmad, W.; Khan, K.; Sayed, M.M. Mapping Research Knowledge on Rice Husk Ash Application in Concrete: A
Scientometric Review. Materials 2022, 15, 3431. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
3
materials
Review
Potential of New Sustainable Green Geopolymer Metal Composite
(GGMC) Material as Mould Insert for Rapid Tooling (RT) in
Injection Moulding Process
Allice Tan Mun Yin 1 , Shayfull Zamree Abd Rahim 1,2, *, Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah 2,3 ,
Marcin Nabialek 4 , Abdellah El-hadj Abdellah 5 , Allan Rennie 6 , Muhammad Faheem Mohd Tahir 2,3
and Aurel Mihail Titu 7
1 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau 02600, Malaysia
2 Center of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis,
Kangar 01000, Malaysia
3 Faculty of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Malaysia
4 Department of Physics, Faculty of Production Engineering and Materials Technology, Cz˛estochowa
University of Technology, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland
5 Laboratory of Mechanics, Physics and Mathematical Modelling (LMP2M), University of Medea,
Medea 26000, Algeria
6 Lancaster Product Development Unit, Engineering Department, Lancaster University,
Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK
7 Industrial Engineering and Management Department, Faculty of Engineering, “Lucian Blaga” University of
Sibiu, 10 Victoriei Street, 550024 Sibiu, Romania
* Correspondence: [email protected]
Abstract: The investigation of mould inserts in the injection moulding process using metal epoxy
composite (MEC) with pure metal filler particles is gaining popularity among researchers. Therefore,
to attain zero emissions, the idea of recycling metal waste from industries and workshops must
be investigated (waste free) because metal recycling conserves natural resources while requiring
Citation: Yin, A.T.M.; Rahim, S.Z.A.; less energy to manufacture new products than virgin raw materials would. The utilisation of metal
Al Bakri Abdullah, M.M.; Nabialek, scrap for rapid tooling (RT) in the injection moulding industry is a fascinating and potentially viable
M.; Abdellah, A.E.-h.; Rennie, A.; approach. On the other hand, epoxy that can endure high temperatures (>220 ◦ C) is challenging to
Tahir, M.F.M.; Titu, A.M. Potential of find and expensive. Meanwhile, industrial scrap from coal-fired power plants can be a precursor
New Sustainable Green Geopolymer to creating geopolymer materials with desired physical and mechanical qualities for RT applica-
Metal Composite (GGMC) Material
tions. One intriguing attribute of geopolymer is its ability to endure temperatures up to 1000 ◦ C.
as Mould Insert for Rapid Tooling
Nonetheless, geopolymer has a higher compressive strength of 60–80 MPa (8700–11,600 psi) than
(RT) in Injection Moulding Process.
epoxy (68.95 MPa) (10,000 psi). Aside from its low cost, geopolymer offers superior resilience to
Materials 2023, 16, 1724. https://
harsh environments and high compressive and flexural strength. This research aims to investigate the
doi.org/10.3390/ma16041724
possibility of generating a new sustainable material by integrating several types of metals in green
Academic Editor: Andrea Sorrentino geopolymer metal composite (GGMC) mould inserts for RT in the injection moulding process. It
Received: 19 November 2022 is necessary to examine and investigate the optimal formulation of GGMC as mould inserts for RT
Revised: 13 February 2023 in the injection moulding process. With less expensive and more ecologically friendly components,
Accepted: 16 February 2023 the GGMC is expected to be a superior choice as a mould insert for RT. This research substantially
Published: 19 February 2023 impacts environmental preservation, cost reduction, and maintaining and sustaining the metal waste
management system. As a result of the lower cost of recycled metals, sectors such as mould-making
and machining will profit the most.
5
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
1. Introduction
Time to market is a crucial aspect of a product development strategy, and speed is
frequently compared to other factors such as functionality, creativity, or performance [1–3].
With numerous new technologies, worldwide rivalry for product creation is soaring.
Furthermore, companies are always looking for cutting-edge technologies that are cost-
effective, capable of manufacturing goods in tiny quantities while maintaining excellent
performance, and able to meet sustainability goals. This has driven the development
of rapid tooling (RT) techniques, which are needed in today’s market to replace tradi-
tional techniques with rapid product innovation and improve manufacturing processes,
particularly mould-making [4–6].
As shown in Figure 1, RT provides quicker manufacturing for completing tests and
starting final production, minimises costs, and reduces project time [7].
Every industry, regardless of size, experiences a time when rapid tooling is required
to address particular problems. Additionally, an improved tooling system is required for
creating a limited number of functional prototypes to assess the product development
cycle [8–10]. A small quantity of items is often utilised as a marketplace trial, evaluation
need, and manufacturing process design [9,10].
Before mass manufacturing, functioning tools or prototypes must be launched for
every scientific study [11–14]. These are not made available in large quantities to consumers
but rather in limited amounts to researchers. RT is highly advantageous in this circumstance
since it allows for the rapid introduction of items. Furthermore, the uses of production
tools allow mass production to be obtained at a lower price because manufacturing costs
are cheap. For this reason, many brand-new businesses and even big organisations prefer
this technology to boost their profits and obtain a market advantage over their rivals [1–3].
Prototype companies or mould producers typically employ mild steel or aluminium
for the mould inserts in RT. Production toolmaking is time-consuming and costly, and
machining involves the same computer numerical control (CNC), electrical discharge ma-
chining (EDM), and electric discharge machining (wire EDM) procedures [15,16]. Recently,
additive manufacturing (AM) has been employed to create mould inserts for RT [13,16].
For a limited number of prototypes, RT often uses models or prototypes made by AM as
templates for manufacturing mould inserts or uses the AM process directly [4–6]. Numer-
ous RT technologies are available on the market, such as a hybrid technique combining RT
and AM to shorten RT production time.
RT can be categorised as either an indirect or direct technique and differs from tra-
ditional tooling in that the amount of time needed to create the tooling is significantly
reduced [17,18]. Automated manufacturing methods use the AM process to generate mould
inserts without the requirement for values to be predicted. Direct tooling includes processes
such as additive manufacturing (AM), stereolithography (SLA), jet photopolymerisation
(PolyJet), fused deposition moulding (FDM), and selective laser sintering (SLS) [5,6,19]. Al-
6
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
7
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
sizes to powder, mechanical milling offers a chance for environmentally friendly powder
production [31,47–49]. For mechanical milling, ambient or cryogenic temperatures are
typically used [49,50]. The aforementioned considerable energy input is no longer required
to reach atomisation temperatures [50]. Due to these potential benefits, mechanical milling
is being used to reduce metal machining chips to powders that can be used in AM [46].
On the other hand, Davidovits’ geopolymer technology is one of the groundbreaking
innovations resulting in an affordable and greener binder alternative. The silica and alu-
minium in geosource materials such as metakaolin (calcined kaolin), and maybe techniques
such as fly ash and bottom ash, are combined with the alkaline liquid to generate a geopoly-
mer, an alkali-activated binder [1,11]. As a result, it reduces not only CO2 emissions but also
recycles industrial waste, specifically using an aluminium–silicate mix to create products of
higher value [9,10]. MEC using pure metal filler particles is beginning to be used by some
researchers to investigate mould inserts in the injection moulding process [4,5,7]. However,
a type of epoxy that can withstand high temperatures (>220 ◦ C) is hard to find and still
costly.
Additionally, besides municipal solid waste, coal combustion production (CCP) has
been identified as the second-largest pollutant in the world. In 2011, about 130 metric
tonnes (MT) of CCP were generated, with only 56.57 MT (43.50%) effectively used [51].
The four forms of solid waste created in substantial amounts by the CCP are boiler slag,
bottom ash, fly ash, and flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) material [40–42]. One hundred
and thirty metric tonnes of CCP included around 59.9 MT of fly ash. Fly ash was disposed
of in surface impoundments covered with compacted clay soil, a plastic sheet, or both
for the remaining 22.9 MT (38.36%) in landfills or surface impoundments [51–53]. The
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the United States (US) is now investigating the
positive uses of fly ash [53–57]. This eliminates major health concerns associated with heavy
metals and radioactive elements accumulated from fly ash disposal over time. Geopolymers
derived from environmentally friendly materials, such as slag, or industrial by-products
and used as a binding material are known as “green material”.
One interesting property of geopolymer is that it can withstand temperatures up
to 1000 ◦ C. Nevertheless, geopolymer only has a compressive strength of 60–80 MPa
(8700–11,600 psi), while epoxy has a compressive strength of 68.95 MPa (10,000 psi) [29,58].
However, employing geopolymer material has similar issues to using epoxy resin, which
necessitates determining the optimal strength, accuracy, acceptable surface finish, and good
thermal characteristics.
Early strength of geopolymer can be obtained as early as 1 day, with compressive
strength up to 15 MPa, and continues increase up to 40–50MPa within 7 days, which is
comparable with the strength offered by epoxy. Nevertheless, the optimum strength of
geopolymer material can be obtained by 28 days (80 MPa) and the strength will keep on
increasing over time [59].
It was recognised that the filler’s interlaminar strength controls the bond strength of
geopolymer reinforced with filler. The fact that filler with a bigger particle size has a lower
binding strength is also well known. In addition, compared to epoxy resin, geopolymer
showed high bond strength for both wet and dry interface surface conditions [59].
On the other hand, as the need for an environmentally friendly society grows, the
quantity of waste material must be continually decreased. Hence, in order to achieve zero
emissions, the idea of recycling metal waste from factories and workshops needs to be
examined (waste free) [60–63]. Metal recycling helps to conserve natural resources while
requiring less energy for manufacturing new products than would be required for virgin
raw materials. Waste-free recycling reduces the emission of carbon dioxide and certain
other harmful gases while also saving money and enabling industrial companies to reduce
their production costs [64,65].
Through a Google Patents search (https://patents.google.com/ accessed on 10 Febru-
ary 2023), six patents granted/published that make use of (1) metal composite and compos-
ites made of (2) geopolymer and (3) metal were located. Table 1 lists the search terms for
8
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
this review’s related field, rapid tooling. Fibre-reinforced metal composites (aluminium
matrix composites) were developed by Yamamoto et al. [65] using aluminium alloy with
6–11 wt. % nickel as the metal matrix and reinforcing fibres. To mass produce complex
parts with near-net shapes, Behi et al. [66] proposed using steel tooling in an injection
moulding machine. In comparison to more traditional methods, this approach to producing
complicated metal tooling is relatively cost-effective, making it possible to rapidly fabricate
complex shaped parts using normal metal, ceramic, and plastic processing. According
to the metal matrix composite introduced by Shaikh et al. [67], the fibre to metal or alloy
ratio ranges from about 9:1 to less than about 1:1, and the fibres have an average diameter
of approximately eight micrometres with a coating. Amaya and Crounse [68] discovered
rapid manufacturing of mould inserts by employing blank die inserts formed from material
typically used in the metal injection moulding process of complex shaped components to
achieve high machinability rates, time and cost savings, extended tool life, and material
savings. The dry-mix composition, as proposed by Nematollahi and Sanjayan [69], includes
(a) an aluminosilicate material rich in silica and alumina and (b) a powdered alkali activator.
Moreover, the dry-mix composition is chosen so that (i) the SHGC may be generated at
ambient temperature without liquid activator, and (ii) strain-hardening behaviour and
multiple cracking behaviours are observed. A strain-hardened, ambient temperature-cured
geopolymer composite (SHGC) is generated by adding water and using a method of manu-
facturing an ambient temperature-cured SHGC. Qiang et al. [70] proposed a geopolymer
composite material that is a type of 3D print as well as their preparation technique and
applications, which included blast furnace slag powder accounting for 20~25% of the total
composition weight, steel-making slag powder accounting for 10~15%, fly ash accounting
for 0~5%, mine tailing machine-made sand accounting for 33~45%, exciting composite
agent accounting for 3~5%, high molecular weight polymer accounting for 2.5~3%, volume
stabiliser accounting for 1~3%, thixotropic agent accounting for 1~2%, defoamer accounting
for 0.05~0.1%, and mixing water accounting for 13.9~12.45%. Each component is stirred,
and subsequently pumped into the 3D printer applications for construction. The present
invention’s geopolymer composite material demonstrates good caking property, strong
stability, good go-out pump from holding capacity and adhesive property, excellent form,
and volume stability, resulting in the construction of buildings with good overall stability
and safety during use. The six patents granted/published from 1990 to February 2023 are
listed in Table 1.
RT is a cost-effective solution in the transition phase from new product development
to mass production in the manufacturing industry [71,72]. RT, often referred to as bridge
tooling, prototype tooling, or soft tooling, is a fast way to preproduce hundreds or even
thousands of plastic parts prior to mass production, for design optimisation, functional
testing, or preproduction verification, which can be a bridge between rapid prototyping
(RP) and mass production. Shape, fit, and function prototype components are frequently
made using RP technology, such as additive manufacturing [71,73,74]. Recycled metal
waste such as mild steel, aluminium, copper, and brass after machining processes are as
shown in Figure 2.
However, since 3D material qualities vary from those used in injection moulding,
3D-printed samples cannot provide a thorough evaluation of an injection-moulded part’s
functional performance [18,59], making RT extremely crucial for the manufacturing indus-
try.
9
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
Granted/Publication
No. Patent Number Title Inventor/s Patent Summary
Date
Tadashi Yamamoto,
Fibre-reinforced metal • Aluminium matrix composite is a fibre-reinforced metal
1 US4980242A Michiyuki Suzuki, Yoshiharu 25 December 1990
composite composite containing 6–11% nickel.
Waku, Masahiro Tokuse [65]
• Steel tooling is needed to produce near-net form, complex items
Mohammad Behi, Mike in high volume.
Rapid manufacture of metal
2 US6056915A Zedalis, James M. 2 May 2000 • The technology is economical to make complex metal tooling for
and ceramic tooling
Schoonover [66] quick fabrication of complex shaped parts using conventional
metal, ceramic, and plastic processes.
Low-temperature,
high-strength metal-matrix Furqan Zafar Shaikh, • Fibre to metal or alloy ratio can vary from 9:1 to 1:1.
3 US6376098B1 composite for Howard Douglas Blair, 23 April 2002 • Fibres have an average diameter of 8 micrometres, and metal or
rapid-prototyping and Tsung-Yu Pan [67] alloy is distributed within them.
rapid-tooling
10
• Mould inserts manufactured from metal injection moulding
material provide high machinability rates, time and cost savings,
extended tool life, and material savings.
Method for the rapid Herman Amaya, Dennis
4 US20020187065A1 12 December 2002 • The process involves developing cutting path programmes from
fabrication of mould inserts Crounse [68]
CAD files, machining cavity and core inserts to predefined sizes,
and processing them to transform the soft material into a dense,
hardenable material.
Geopolymer composite and
Behzad Nematollahi, Jay • The dry-mix composition allows for the formation of ambient
5 WO2017070748A1 geopolymer matrix 4 May 2017
Sanjayan [69] temperature-cured SHGC without the need for a liquid activator.
composition
• Slag powder composition includes blast furnace slag,
Lin Xi Qiang, Li Jing Fang, steel-making slag powder, fly ash, mine tailing sand, composite
3D printed geopolymer Zhang Tao, Huo Liang, Li exciting agent, volume stabiliser, thixotropic agent, defoamer,
6 CN106082898A composite material, its Guo You, Zhang Nan, Liao 31 July 2018 and mixing water.
production and applications Juan, Wang Bao Hua, Ji Wen • The invention’s geopolymer composite material has good caking
Zhan [70] properties, stability, form and volume stability, providing good
stability and safety for building construction.
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
Figure 2. (a) Metal scraps from turning; (b) metal scraps from grinding; (c) metal scraps from milling.
Using fly ash (waste from coal combustion) as the raw material, the metal scraps from
the machining process are ground using a ball mill machine into a small and uniform
size and mixed with geopolymer material to create green geopolymer metal composite
(GGMC) material as in Figure 3. Then, this material can be used as mould inserts for RT
applications which is expected to reduce tooling production costs and lead periods by up
to 25% and 50%, respectively. The effect of GGMC material as mould inserts for RT in an
injection moulding process and its relationship with compressive strength and thermal
conductivity should be examined accordingly. Therefore, this research aims to determine
whether geopolymer material may be used as RT mould inserts in the injection moulding
process. The process by which GMCs are used as a new material for mould inserts is
depicted in Figure 4.
Figure 3. Planetary Mono Mill Pulverisette 6 can be used in the ball mill process.
11
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
A power plant is a structure that produces waste geopolymer and generates electric
energy from another form of energy. The geopolymer material is then combined with
filler particles (waste from machining after a ball milling process to form a powder filler).
The ratio of geopolymer and powder filler is evaluated accordingly in terms of thermal
conductivity and compressive strength. Next, the optimised ratio is used to fabricate the
GMC mould inserts. Then, GMC mould inserts are machined accordingly to fit the insert
size and assembled in the mould base. Following the examination of the GMC mould
inserts, the GMC mould is assembled in the injection moulding machine to mould out
the specimen for further evaluation of the mould parts’ quality in terms of shrinkage
and warpage, including the cooling time required, which is definitely influenced by the
thermal conductivity of the GMC mould inserts. The reliability of the GMC mould inserts
is evaluated accordingly in terms of the number of shots (specimens) that can be produced
before the mould starts to crack or wear.
12
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
processing parameter that causes warpage defects on the moulded parts produced. The
relationship between melt temperature and the flow of molten plastic into the mould
cavities through feeding system has been studied and it was reported that the amount of
material flow into the cavities is affected by the melt temperature [84,85].
13
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
materials of the mould base are divided into four types, which are mild steel, high-alloy
steel, stainless steel, and tool steel, as tabulated in Table 2 [83–87].
Mild steel is a type of iron that has varied levels of carbon added to it and no addition
of other elements. There are different percentages of carbon where the carbon content
ranges from mild, to medium, to high. Examples of carbon steel are carbon steel 1018 and
1050 [83,86]. High-alloy steel is a variety of steel that is alloyed with additional components
ranging from 1 wt. % to 50 wt. % through the addition of carbon to enhance the material’s
different qualities.
High-alloy steel is therefore made of iron that has been alloyed with additional ele-
ments including copper, chromium, and aluminium. It can also alloy more than two metals.
Examples of alloy steel are alloy steel AISI 4130 and AISI M2 [35]. Stainless steel provides
excellent corrosion resistance and machinability. Stainless steel is a class of iron-based
alloys notable for their corrosion and heat resistance.
Furthermore, stainless steel is produced by adding chromium at a rate of about 11%
and the use of stainless steel is selected because it does not corrode or oxidise. Stainless
steel does not require stress relief because its material qualities are stable. Examples of
stainless steel are stainless steel 420, 316L, and 17-4 PH [88,92,93]. Tool steel refers to a
range of carbon and alloy steels that are especially well-suited to be produced into tools.
In addition, tool steel contains elements such as tungsten, vanadium, cobalt, and
molybdenum [94]. These elements are used to improve hardenability and generate harder
and more thermally stable carbides. Examples of tool steels are tool steel O-1, A-6, S-7, D-2,
P-20, and H13 [83,88]. RT is the AM technology that refers to the manufacturing methods
of tooling [94–96].
Injection mould bases can be made from a wide variety of materials. However,
selecting the right mould base material is essential for making high-quality components,
since different materials have different properties.
14
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
it can perform well at high temperatures, and has high dimensional stability, hardness,
and wear resistance [97]. The recommended mould material for transparent products is
stainless steel AISI 420, which has a hardness of up to 54HRC [98].
On the other hand, mould inserts are assembled in a mould base and form the cavities
where the molten plastic will be injected to form the products. Therefore, the material of
the mould insert is an important aspect that will have a direct impact on the defects of the
moulded parts produced.
However, the materials used to fabricate mould inserts for the product designed in
the development stage do not have to be the same as materials used for the hard tooling
(mould used for mass production) because the product design is not yet finalised and there
are still some tests and evaluations to be carried out, as well as a need to improve the
product’s features in terms of ease of assembly and reliability tests in order to ensure the
high quality of product. An alternative material of mould inserts for low production in
the product development industry is in high demand, especially in the effort to reduce the
expenses in the research and development stage.
15
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
Reshape-
NeuKadur XD4532 or
Name EP250 EPO 752 Express
VGSP5 XD4533
2000™
Altropol
MCP HEK Axson Technologies
Kunststoff GmbH, Ciba Specialty Chemicals
Resin Producer Tooling GmbH, (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.,
Stockelsdorf, Holding Inc., Basel, Switzerland
Lubeck, Germany Shanghai, China
Germany
Density (kg/m3 ) 2 2.8 1.7–1.78 1.7 ± 0.02 1.8
Tensile strength (MPa) 67 50 49 38 ± 4 62
Compressive strength
260 180 NA 145 ± 5 251
(MPa)
Flexural strength
120 NA 88 90 ± 5 82
(MPa)
Deflexion
250 150 195 220 234
temperature (◦ C)
Linear
expansion 30–35 30–35 50 NA 42
(×106 mm/K)
112 90 90 90 91
Hardness
(Rc) (Shore D) (Shore D15) (Shore D) (Shore D)
Nevertheless, there are some restrictions when using epoxy as a mould insert in RT for
injection moulding. Epoxy has limitations that must be overcome, such as its low hardness
and strength [103]. Geopolymer can be used to replace epoxy since it is robust and strong
and is now utilised in building concrete. In addition, it preserves the environment, reduces
cost, and supports sustainability of waste management systems [81,94,95,104,105]. As an
implication, industries related to mould-making will benefit the most due to the reduced
cost when using recycled materials.
16
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
hardening within the mould chamber and becoming brittle. Indirectly crafted tools thus
wear very quickly [104]. Some of the studies concentrating on RT are listed in Table 5.
Tomori et al. [110] investigated how changing the material formulation and deter-
mining the validity of composite tooling boards affected mould efficiency and component
quality. An example of the method for setting up a tooling board is illustrated in Figure 5.
The boards were constructed using three materials: RP4037 (fluid), RP4037 hardener, and
silicon carbide (SiC) filler (powder). For the six moulds, two cutting speeds (1.00 and
1.66 m/s) and three tooling board formulations (28.5%, 34.75%, and 39.9% wt. % SiC filler)
were used. The surface roughness of the moulded components served as the study’s re-
sponse variable, while cutting speed served as the study’s independent parameter. As there
was no visible mould damage, the physical structure of the mould was unchanged by SiC
concentration and cutting speed. This discovery indicated that the SiC content in the mould
has a significant impact on the surface roughness of the moulded items. Additionally, the
flexural strength rose with the SiC filler concentration (from 58.75 to 66.49 MPa), following
a pattern comparable to the heat conductivity of the mould material. The influence of
filler concentration primarily on the direction of welding for moulded components was not
examined in this research.
Senthilkumar et al. [111] studied the effects of epoxy resin on the mechanical char-
acteristics of aluminium (Al) particles. The sample was cast utilising Al filler mixed into
epoxy resin at various concentrations. Optical microscopy revealed that the Al particles
were uniformly dispersed throughout the epoxy resin matrix. These results show that
increasing the amount of Al particles inside the epoxy resin matrix significantly raises both
the thermal conductivity (3.97 to 5.39 W/mK) and the hardness value of the composite
(69 to 89 RHL). The sample’s fatigue life decreased from 15,786 cycles to 734 cycles as
the Al content of the epoxy resin increased. The best percentage of Al filler particle for
enhancing mould performance and durability was found to be between 45 and 55 wt.%
There was an improvement of 72 RHL in durability, 10,011 cycles in fatigue resistance,
and 4.06 W/mK in thermal conductivity. However, the hardness value increased by 4.34%
for every 5% increase in Al filler particles, which might reduce the fatigue life by 36.58%.
Nevertheless, there has been no further research on the moulded components’ flexural
strength, compressive strength, tensile strength, or surface appearance.
Srivastava and Verma [27] attempted to determine how the addition of Cu and Al
particles to epoxy resin composites altered their mechanical properties. Epoxy resin was
mixed with Cu and Al particles (1, 5, 8, and 10 wt. %) to create a variety of filler composi-
tions. The results of the mechanical tests showed that the epoxy resin with Al reinforcement
has excellent tensile properties, with a tensile strength of 104.5 MPa at 1 wt. %, while the
epoxy resin composites with Cu filler was optimal in the hardness test (22.4 kgF/mm2
at 8 wt. %) and had a compressive strength of 65 MPa at 10 wt. %. In addition, epoxy
resin composites filled with Cu demonstrated better performance than those filled with
Al despite having a lower hardness. This finding demonstrated that the tensile strength,
wear loss, and hardness of the material all decreased steadily with increasing filler content,
whereas the compressive strength, friction coefficient, and hardness all showed an increase.
However, the impact of the welding direction on the surface of the moulded components is
yet to be determined.
17
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
Researchers
Shore D
Thermal
Tensile
Vickers
Particle Size
Thermal
Flexural
of Filler (wt. %)
Hardness
Test (RH )
Weight Percentage
Hardness Test
Compressive
Fatigue Test
Particles/Fillers Used
Strength (MPa)
Strength (MPa)
Strength (MPa)
Density (g/cm3 )
Surface Roughness
Arithmetic Mean
Epoxy Resin/Hardener
Diffusivity (mm2 /s)
Hardness (kgF/mm2 )
Conductivity (W/m·K)
• 40
• 45
Senthilkumar • Araldite LY 556 • 45–150 • 15,786
2. • Al • 50 • N/A • N/A • 69 to 89 • 3.97 to 5.39 • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A
et al. (2012) [111] (resin) μm to 734
• 55
• 60
• 1
Srivastava and • PL-411 (resin) • Cu =
• Cu • 5 • <85 (pure • Cu = 65 at 10
3. Verma (2015) • PH-861 • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A 22.4 at 8 • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A
• Al • 8 epoxy) wt. %
[27] (hardener) wt. %
• 10
18
• Steel AISI P20 • Steel AISI P20
• RenCast 436 inserts = 20.0 inserts = 66 ±
Fernandes et al. (resin with Al ± 4.5 3.2
4. (2016) filler) • Al • 21.4 • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • Epoxy • N/A • N/A • Epoxy • N/A • N/A • N/A
[26] • Ren HY 150 resin/Al resin/Al
(hardener) inserts = 22.0 inserts = 61 ±
± 5.0 1.6
• Average
microgroove
depth of
Al-filled epoxy
resin was
Kuo and Lin • TE-375 (Al filled 90.5%
6. • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A • N/A
(2019) [113] epoxy resin) • Average
microgroove
width of
Al-filled epoxy
resin was
98.9%
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
Fernandes et al. [26] studied the dimensions and mechanical characteristics of epoxy
resin/Al insert-moulded PP injection components for RT. A 140 mm diameter sphere was
made up of five chambers with 2 mm thick walls that formed the work’s central geometrical
component. The length of the test was 60 mm, the diameter of the entrance was 6.5 mm, and
the draught angle was 2◦ . To test the suggested mould, a novel hybrid mould comprising
epoxy resin and Al was employed in this work to insert polypropylene (PP) pieces. In
addition, comparable pieces were inserted to use an AISI P20 (conventional) steel mould,
the same as in the genuine application. Epoxy resin/Al insert-filled components had
slightly higher tensile strength at yield (22.0 ± 5.0 MPa) than steel AISI P20 insert-filled
components (20.0 ± 4.5 MPa), but the difference was not statistically significant. Epoxy
resin/Al-injected parts had lower values for ultimate tensile strength, elongation at break,
and modulus of elasticity than steel AISI P20-injected parts. Furthermore, the Shore D
hardness of objects formed by AISI P20 steel inserts increased by 8.5% in comparison to
goods moulded by epoxy/Al inserts. When compared to components injected using an
epoxy/Al mould, those injected using an AISI P20 steel mould showed less shrinkage.
Based on these findings, epoxy/Al moulding blocks may be a high-quality alternative to
fast tooling for producing single units or small series. Furthermore, this research did not
investigate whether the orientation of welding on the moulded components was affected
by the impact.
Khushairi et al. [112] investigated various epoxy compositions using Al, Cu, and brass
fillers which were tested for their mechanical and thermal properties. In Al-filled epoxy,
different combinations of brass and Cu filler (10, 20, and 30% wt. %) were used. Brass
and Cu densities were 2.22 g/cm3 and 2.08 g/cm3 at the optimum filler content, respec-
19
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
tively. When 30% Cu fillers were added to an epoxy matrix, the total thermal diffusivity
(1.12 mm2 /s) and thermal conductivity (1.87 W/mK) were the maximum, but adding brass
had no effect on thermal properties. When 20% brass filler was added, compressive strength
increased from 76.8 MPa to 93.2 MPa, whereas 10% Cu filler raised compressive strength
from 76.8 MPa to 80.8 MPa. As a result of porosity, multiple metal fillers diminished the
compressive strength. According to this research, fillers boost mechanical, thermal, and
density properties of Al-filled epoxy. Nonetheless, a careful evaluation of the surface char-
acteristics, notably the welding line of the moulded components, is necessary to determine
the moulded parts’ quality.
Kuo and Lin [113] examined the quick injection moulding of Fresnel lenses from
liquid silicone rubber. The experiment was conducted utilising RT and liquid silicone
rubber (LSR) parts to build a horizontal LSR moulding machine (Allrounder 370S 700–290,
ARBURG, Loßburg, Germany). Injection moulds for LSR injection moulding could be
manufactured using Al-filled epoxy resin. The total microgroove depth and width of the
Al-filled epoxy resin mould were 90.5% and 98.9%, respectively. LSR-moulded components
exhibited typical microgroove depth and width transcription rates of roughly 91.5% and
99.2%, respectively. LSR-moulded components’ microgroove depth as well as width may be
modified to within 1 m. The mean surface polish of the Al-filled epoxy resins increased by
around 12.5 nm following 200 LSR injector test cycles. However, further testing on tensile
strength, compressive strength, hardness, and density, as well as weld line observations,
is essential to understand the impact of quick injection moulding on the recommended
mould in terms of moulded component quality.
From the review that has been carried out, it can be seen that numerous elements
such as flexural strength, hardness, thermal conductivity, tensile strength, compressive
strength, density, thermal diffusivity, and surface roughness of the new material introduced
are important factors that need to be considered prior to its use as mould inserts for RT in
the injection moulding process.
2.4. Geopolymer
A geopolymer is formed by combining a dry solid containing high aluminosilicate
content, called a precursor, with alkaline solution and other ingredients if needed [114].
It is a semicrystalline, three-dimensional structure made of the tetrahedral structures of
silica and alumina that share oxygen [115]. Geopolymer precursor can be obtained in two
ways: from geological origin or industrial by-products. Examples of geological origins
are kaolinite and clay, while industrial by-products are fly ash (FA), wheat straw ash,
and furnace ash. Geopolymers are activated using high-alkali solution for the polymeric
reaction to occur by using sodium hydroxide (NaOH), potassium hydroxide (KOH), or a
mixture of sodium oxide (N2 O) and silicon monoxide (SiO) [116].
The geopolymer concrete curing process has a significant impact on mechanical charac-
teristics and microstructure development [117,118]. Excellent mechanical strength, reduced
creep, improved acid resistance, and minimal danger of shrinkage are all characteristics of
geopolymer concrete [41,119,120]. The durability of waste pozzolan-based geopolymer con-
crete that is cured at high temperatures has been extensively studied [121–124]. By curing
the geopolymer at a higher temperature, one may enhance the geopolymer’s mechanical
properties, polymerisation level, microstructure density, and overall strength [117,125–127].
Geopolymers come in a variety of unique shapes, and each type has certain properties.
Geopolymers are an alternative material in the tooling industry. However, changing the
geopolymer composition will change the qualities of the geopolymer, where selecting the
correct geopolymer precursor will give the tooling industry greater advantages.
20
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
No. Researchers Curing Days Curing Temperature Material Composition Mechanical Properties Result
• Compressive strength • The highest strength achieved was 71.78 MPa after
• Flexural strength ambient curing at 56 days.
• SiO2 /Al2 O3 ratio of
Girish et al. (2018) • Split tensile strength • Compressive strength values indicate an increase in
2. • 7, 28, 56 • 30 ◦ C 3.0–3.8
[132] • Modulus of elasticity the strength of all mixes.
• Na2 O/Al2 O3 ratio of 1
• Flexural strength of beams • At 28 days, the compressive strength of the cement
sliced from slab concrete exceeded the rigid pavement’s minimum
compressive strength requirement (40 MPa).
21
• 1.0 wt. % of either FA, • Slag geopolymer in SnCu solder paste impacts on the
Izzati et al. (2020) • FA and slag at 27 ◦ C
3. •3 kaolin, slag geopolymer • Hardness microhardness values.
[133] • Kaolin at 80 ◦ C
particles in Sn-0.7Cu • Slag geopolymer particles enhanced hardness by up to
7.84 Hv.
• MR0 and MR1 cement: • MR1 has the greatest preliminary compressive
fine aggregate • Compressive strength strength.
Hussein and Fawzi •2 • 40 ◦ C • MR2, MR3, MR4—fly ash • Splitting tensile strength • Geopolymer mix MR4 has the highest mechanical
5.
(2021) [135] in slag at 0.75:0.25, • Flexural strength properties.
0.65:0.35, and 0.55:0.45 • In splitting tensile strength and bending strength tests,
fibre addition produces better results.
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
Figure 6. Compressive strength of geopolymer concrete with different mixture compositions [131].
Flexural
Curing Compressive Flexural Split Tensile Modulus of Strength of
Period in Strength Strength Strength Elasticity Beams
Days (MPA) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) Sliced From
Slab
7 45.22 3.85 - - 4.05
28 56.41 4.63 3.96 37,471.44 4.95
56 71.78 5.42 4.96 38,197.20 5.22
22
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
Izzati et al. [133] evaluated the use of different levels of geopolymer. No geopolymers,
1.0 wt. % fly ash, kaolin, or slag geopolymer particles were added to Sn-0.7Cu. All the
mix designs were cured for 3 days and the temperature of curing for fly ash and slag was
27 ◦ C and that for kaolin was 80 ◦ C. As illustrated in Figure 7, using slag geopolymer is
more challenging compared to not using geopolymer and using other geopolymers. Future
research can attempt at using a higher percentage of geopolymer to test the composition’s
hardness. This may result in higher hardness compared to 1% geopolymer. To be compa-
rable to other geopolymers, future research needs improve its preparation procedure in
terms of curing temperature.
Hussein and Fawzi [134] tested various geopolymer contents in mix composition.
The normal composition was cement with fine aggregate and coarse aggregate and 0%
and 5% copper fibre, while the geopolymer composition had varied amounts of fly ash
(FA) and slag with fine aggregate and coarse aggregate and 0% and 5% copper fibre. The
preparation was cured at 40 ◦ C for seven to twenty-eight days to evaluate compressive
strength, splitting tensile strength, and bending strength. Figure 8 demonstrates that the
maximum compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and bending strength increase
when the FA to ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) ratio is 0.55:0.45 with 0.5%
copper wire fibre. It indicates that the compressive strength increases as the GGBFS level
rises. The maximum strength of the geopolymer content can be determined by employing
longer curing times and greater FA to GGBFS ratios.
Hussein and Fawzi [135] analysed different contents of geopolymer by using different
ratios of fly ash (FA) to ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS). Cement, fine
aggregate, and coarse aggregate were used in the preparation of MR0 and MR1, while fly
ash to slag ratios for MG0, MG1, MG2, and MG3 were 0.75:0.25, 0.65:0.35, and 0.55:0.45 and
23
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
mixed with fine aggregate and coarse aggregate in MR1, MG1, MG2, and MG3 with 0.5%
copper fibre added. The preparation was cured at 40 ◦ C for seven and twenty-eight days.
As depicted in Figure 9, the larger the proportion of GGBFS, the greater the compressive
strength and, at ninety days, 45% GGBFS had the highest compressive strength. MG3 with
a content of 45% GGBFS shows the highest split tensile strength and flexural strength. To
determine the ideal fly ash to slag ratio for assessing hardness, an analysis with a higher fly
ash to slag ratio could be carried out.
Figure 9. Different content percentages of GGBFS show different compressive strengths [135].
24
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
Table 8. Research on the effects of various proportions of sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide and fly ash/alkaline activators on the mechanical properties.
Morsy et al. (2014) • Compressive strength • Curing time has a direct correlation with the
1. • 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 • 2.5 • 80 ◦ C
[136] • Flexural strength increase in compressive and flexural strength.
25
Nis • 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 • 180 ◦ C for 26 days
• Compressive strength compressive strength of the specimens dropped
4.
(2019) [139] • Delayed oven-curing at 14 M.
at 70 ◦ C for 48 h
According to Liyana et al. [137], in their study, the proportions of Na2 SiO3 /NaOH
solution and fly ash to alkaline activator were synthesised in four different ratios: 1.0, 1.5,
2.0, and 2.5, in a 24 h period during which curing was carried out at room temperature.
According to the results, the fly ash/alkaline activator ratio of 2.0 had the highest results
compared to other ratios, and the sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide ratio of 2.5 had the
highest results compared to other ratios. The best mechanical properties can be obtained
through research using various molarities and curing temperatures.
The study by Bakri et al. [138] used a 12 M concentration of NaOH and fly ash to
alkaline activator ratios of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0. Only the three ratios of 1.5, 2.0,
and 2.5 were employed. Due to the geopolymer paste’s high workability, which makes it
challenging to handle, the ratios of 0.5 and 1.0 could not be used, and the ratio 3.0 could
not be used due to the paste’s low workability. Five different ratios of Na2 SiO3 /NaOH
were used: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5. The sample was cured for 24 h at 70 ◦ C before being
tested for compressive strength on the seventh day. The fly ash/alkaline activator ratio of
2.0 and the sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide ratio of 2.5 had the maximum compressive
strength. Future studies could examine various curing temperatures to achieve the best
compressive strength.
Nis [139] investigated geopolymer content using various NaOH concentrations and
sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratios. The sodium silicate (Na2 SiO3 ) and sodium
hydroxide (NaOH) solutions were used with four different sodium silicate to sodium
hydroxide ratios (1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5) and three different molarities (6 M, 10 M, and 14 M) for
alkali activation to evaluate the impact of these parameters on the compressive strength of
the alkali-activated fly ash/slag concrete under ambient-curing (AC) and delayed oven-
curing (OC) conditions. The specimens’ compressive strengths varied greatly with molarity
concentration; those with the greatest NaOH molarity (14 M) concentration had the greatest
compressive strength, as depicted in Figure 10. Other than that, more research can consider
investigating the impact of oven-curing conditions on compressive strength.
Abdullah et al. [140] investigated several curing temperatures with a constant NaOH
concentration of 12 M using different fly ash/alkaline activator ratios and Na2 SiO3 /NaOH
ratios. The samples were cured at different temperatures from 40 ◦ C to 80 ◦ C for 24 h and
26
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
compressive strength was tested on the seventh day. The fly ash/alkaline activator ratio
of 2.0, sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide ratio of 2.5, and curing temperature of 60 ◦ C
resulted in the maximum compressive strength. Different curing days may be investigated
in order to enhance compressive strength.
Based on various studies [137–141], the mechanical characteristics may be affected
by the use of different ratios of sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide, and fly ash/alkaline
activator. The strongest strength resulted from the fly ash/alkaline activator ratio of 2.0
and the sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide ratio of 2.5, which were used as the ideal ratio
for sample preparation. However, from the previous investigation, more improvements
can be made, which are optimising the curing temperature and curing durations as using
various curing durations can potentially increase the geopolymer’s mechanical qualities.
Although the mechanical characteristics are influenced by the ratio of sodium sili-
cate/sodium hydroxide and fly ash/alkaline activator, the preparation of different mo-
larities of sodium hydroxide is another key aspect that influences overall mechanical
characteristics of geopolymer.
27
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
• 6M
• 12 M shows the highest compressive strength
• 8M • Fly ash
Bakri et al. • Compressive reached on the seventh day.
1. • 1, 2, 3, 7 • 70◦ C • 10 M • Sodium hydroxide
(2011) [142] Strength (MPa) • The highest compressive strength was
• 12 M • Sodium silicate
achieved on the third day of curing.
• 14 M
• 16 M
28
• Fly ash, slag • The molarity of NaOH was increased while
• 4M • Sodium hydroxide alkali activator duration was decreased due to
Lee et al. • Compressive the amount of slag and water glass.
3. • 3, 7, 14, 28, 56 • 17 ◦ C, 28 ◦ C • 6M • Sodium silicate
(2013) [144] Strength (MPa)
• 8M • Water glass • The amount of slag was increased 25% and 30%
• Sand at 28 days while the amount of slag decreased
after 56 days of curing due to crack evolution.
Gum et al. [143] studied the impact of making geopolymer concrete with an alkaline
activator on the compressive strength of mortars using fly ash as a binder and different
curing temperatures and moles of sodium hydroxide. Fly ash was combined with a mixture
of 6, 9, and 12 M NaOH, and the curing conditions were 60 ◦ C in the oven and 20 ◦ C outside
for 7 classes of curing days. After the chemicals were mixed, it was poured into moulds
with dimensions of 50 mm × 50 mm × 50 mm and measured for compressive strength
according to ASTM C 109. An alkaline activator that used NaOH at a higher molarity
demonstrated increased compressive strength. The compressive strength decreased as the
SiO2 /Na2 O and Al2 O3 /Na2 O ratios increased. When the SiO2 /Na2 O ratio exceeded 8.01
and the Al2 O3 /Na2 O ratio exceeded 1.94, the strength decrease rate appeared to accelerate
sharply at 28 days. Based on these findings, the strength at 28 days for series 1 appeared
to have increased by more than 1.7 times at a NaOH molarity of 9 M when compared to
a molarity of 6 M. However, the 9 M and 12 M results showed nearly identical strengths.
This highlights the significance of the SiO2 /Al2 O3 , SiO2 /Na2 O, and Al2 O3 /Na2 O ratios
in alkali-activated geopolymer based on fly ash. As SiO2 /Al2 O3 was constant in this
investigation, the values of 8.01 and 1.94 for SiO2 /Na2 O and Al2 O2 /Na2 O ratios yielded
the best strength development. The use of NaOH and sodium silicate (SiO2 /Na2 O = 8) in a
1:1 ratio demonstrated that it is possible to activate the geopolymerisation of fly ash and
create a significant increase in strength, with a compressive strength of around 47 MPa. The
evaluations of the impacts of the SiO2 /Na2 O and Al2 O3 /Na2 O ratios on strength under
equal SiO2 /Al2 O3 ratios are illustrated in Figure 11. The requirement for high-strength
concrete is over 40 MPa, demonstrating the possibility of employing fly ash as a cement
substitute. Future research can evaluate whether increasing the molarity and pH of NaOH
during the curing process will increase compressive strength, including multiple curing
temperatures.
Figure 11. Compressive strength versus ages for molarity of NaOH [143].
Lee et al. [144] analysed the effects of increasing amounts of slag, water glass, and
varying curing temperatures and NaOH molarities on curing time reduction. In the
preparation, the alkali activators were water glass (Korean Industrial Standards, KS 3-
grade; SiO2 (29%), Na2 O (10%), H2 O (61%, specific gravity 1.38 g/mL), and 98% pure
NaOH. The room temperature for the combined alkali-activated fly ash/slag paste was
29
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
between 17 ◦ C and 28 ◦ C. For setting time tests, the molarity of NaOH was 4 M and
6 M, and the mass ratio of NaOH was 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5. Then, 8 M NaOH was used to
accelerate the setting of alkali-activated fly ash/slag paste. For each mixed sample, a
100 mm × 200 mm cylinder mould was employed. The compressive strength and setting
times of ASTM C 191-08 [139] were evaluated at 3, 7, 14, 28, and 56 days of curing. At 17 ◦ C,
the alkali-activated fly ash/slag paste took 55 min to start and 160 min to finish when the
NaOH solution was 4 M and the water glass to NaOH solution by weight ratio was 0.5,
as illustrated in Figure 12. Due to the presence of slag and water glass, the molarity of
NaOH rose while the alkali activator’s duration shortened. The quantity of slag grew by
25% and 30% after 28 days, respectively, but reduced after 56 days due to crack growth.
Future research can examine different NaOH molarities to determine whether they can
boost compressive strength.
Khan et al. [146] examined the material properties of fly ash, copper slag, and crusher
dust at different curing temperatures and NaOH concentrations. There were 16 differ-
ent mix designs that used varying curing temperatures and NaOH concentrations. The
design was cured for 28 days before testing, and the analysis revealed that the sodium sili-
cate/sodium hydroxide (SS/SH) ratio should be maintained at 2.4. The molarity of NaOH
should be kept at 14 M to produce maximum strength and dotted line was an average
region, as shown in Figure 13. The setting time was found to decrease from 449.8 min to
340.8 min. There are some limitations, such as the fact that the greater the molarity, the
greater the compressive strength, and this could be due to secondary parameters that may
affect the performance of geopolymer, including mixing time and other parameters that
can influence the complexity of the mix design; therefore, additional research is required to
determine their characteristics.
Rathanasalam et al. [145] investigated different sodium hydroxide (NaOH) molarities
of 10 M, 12 M, and 14 M and developed a mixture utilising 5%, 10%, and 15% ultra-
fine ground granulated blast furnace slag (UFGGBFS) replacing fly ash, with crushed
stone or copper slag. After curing for 3, 7, and 28 days at 60 ◦ C, the compressive
strength was evaluated. The compressive strength of all mix designs was tested using
a 150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm cube. From the different types of design with different
curing days depicted in Figures 14–16, it can be concluded that all the mixtures with 14 M
NaOH concentration have the maximum compressive strength. Future studies can look
into using higher NaOH molarities to determine the ideal NaOH molarity to make the mix
design with the maximum compressive strength.
30
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
Figure 13. Main effects plot for S/N ratios based on compressive strength [146].
Figure 14. Different molarities in the mix design of GPC and copper slag at 3 days [145].
Bakri et al. [142] investigated the compressive strength of fly ash at various sodium
hydroxide molarities. The sodium hydroxide molarities of 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 M and 1,
2, 3, and 7 curing days were used for the mix design samples. The proportion of fly ash to
alkali activator was maintained constant at 2.50, as was the proportion of sodium silicate
to sodium hydroxide. Prior to testing, all mixtures were cured at 70 ◦ C, and the results
indicated that for sodium hydroxide with molarity of 12 M, the compressive strength result
was the highest among the other molarities on the third day, and on the seventh day, it
demonstrated the highest compressive strength, as illustrated in Figure 17. Future research
can examine whether increasing the curing temperature will increase compressive strength.
31
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
Figure 15. Different molarities in the mix design of GPC and copper slag at 7 days [145].
Figure 16. Different molarities in the mix design of GPC and copper slag at 28 days [145].
32
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
Figure 17. Compressive strength of all mixtures with different molarities and curing days [142].
33
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
iii. To enhance the qualities of the outcomes, various geopolymers filled with scrap metal
fillers should be mixed to increase thermal conductivity, or two or more kinds of filler
materials can be added to improve thermal conductivity.
iv. The purpose of carrying out RT before production tooling for mass production is to
evaluate the part performance and mostly requires modification of the mould inserts.
Thus, an investigation on the effects of dimensional accuracy and surface quality in
the machining process is definitely required.
This review has provided a clear reference for future development of mould inserts
for RT using GGMC material. Thus, initiative needs to be taken to conduct an analysis on
the effect of incorporating metal particles in geopolymer material as mould inserts for RT
and its relationship with compressive strength and thermal conductivity. Moreover, the
integration of metal scraps from machining with geopolymer formed from waste makes
this research more interesting. GGMC material should be examined for metallurgical
parameters such as corrosion rate, coefficient of expansion, surface roughness, and additive
manufacturability. Furthermore, the machinability and the reliability of GGMC mould
inserts should be explored and evaluated accordingly. At the end of this research, the
discovery of new sustainable green material will benefit moulding and rapid prototyping
industries, including with its environmentally friendly attributes.
Author Contributions: Conceptualisation, A.T.M.Y., S.Z.A.R., M.M.A.B.A., A.E.-h.A. and A.R.; data
curation, A.T.M.Y., S.Z.A.R., M.M.A.B.A., M.N., A.E.-h.A. and A.R.; formal analysis, M.F.M.T. and
A.M.T.; investigation, M.F.M.T. and A.M.T.; methodology, S.Z.A.R., M.M.A.B.A., A.E.-h.A. and
A.R.; project administration, S.Z.A.R., M.M.A.B.A., A.R., M.N., A.E.-h.A. and A.M.T.; validation,
A.T.M.Y., M.N., M.F.M.T. and A.M.T.; writing—review and editing, A.T.M.Y., S.Z.A.R., M.M.A.B.A.,
A.E.-h.A., A.R., M.F.M.T. and A.M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of
the manuscript.
Funding: This study was supported by the Center of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology
(CEGeoGTech) UniMAP and Faculty of Technology Mechanical Engineering, UniMAP. The authors
wish to thank the Ministry of Education, Malaysia, for their financial support of this study through
the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS), FRGS/1/2020/TK0/UNIMAP/03/19.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Acknowledgments: We would like to acknowledge the reviewers for the helpful advice and com-
ments provided.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Shamsaei, E.; Bolt, O.; de Souza, F.B.; Benhelal, E.; Sagoe-Crentsil, K.; Sanjayan, J. Pathways to commercialisation for brown coal
fly ash-based geopolymer concrete in Australia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4350. [CrossRef]
2. Islam, A.; Alengaram, U.J.; Jumaat, M.Z.; Bashar, I.I.; Kabir, S.A. Engineering properties and carbon footprint of ground granulated
blast-furnace slag-palm oil fuel ash-based structural geopolymer concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 101, 503–521. [CrossRef]
3. Malenab, R.A.J.; Ngo, J.P.S.; Promentilla, M.A.B. Chemical treatment of waste abaca for natural fibre-reinforced geopolymer
composite. Materials 2017, 10, 579. [CrossRef]
4. Costabile, G.; Fera, M.; Fruggiero, F.; Lambiase, A.; Pham, D. Cost models of additive manufacturing: A literature review. Int. J.
Ind. Eng. Comput. 2016, 8, 263–282. [CrossRef]
5. Kuo, C.-C.; Li, M.-R. Development of sheet metal forming dies with excellent mechanical properties using additive manufacturing
and rapid tooling technologies. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 90, 21–25. [CrossRef]
6. Equbal, A.; Sood, A.K.; Shamim, M. Rapid tooling: A major shift in tooling practice. Manuf. Ind. Eng. 2015, 14, 3–4. [CrossRef]
7. Nee, A.Y.C. Handbook of Manufacturing Engineering and Technology; Springer: London, UK, 2015.
8. Huzaim, N.H.M.; Rahim, S.Z.A.; Musa, L.; Abdellah, A.E.-H.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Rennie, A.; Rahman, R.; Garus, S.; Błoch, K.;
Sandu, A.V.; et al. Potential of Rapid Tooling in Rapid Heat Cycle Moulding: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 3725. [CrossRef]
9. Afonso, D.; Pires, L.; de Sousa, R.A.; Torcato, R. Direct rapid tooling for polymer processing using sheet metal tools. Procedia
Manuf. 2017, 13, 102–108. [CrossRef]
34
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
10. Rayna, T.; Striukova, L. From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation.
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2016, 102, 214–224. [CrossRef]
11. Mellor, S.; Hao, L.; Zhang, D. Additive manufacturing: A framework for implementation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014, 149, 194–201.
[CrossRef]
12. Achillas, C.; Aidonis, D.; Iakovou, E.; Thymianidis, M.; Tzetzis, D. A methodological framework for the inclusion of modern
additive manufacturing into the production portfolio of a focused factory. J. Manuf. Syst. 2015, 37, 328–339. [CrossRef]
13. Ciurana, J. Designing, prototyping and manufacturing medical devices: An overview. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2014, 27,
901–918. [CrossRef]
14. Faludi, J.; Bayley, C.; Bhogal, S.; Iribarne, M. Comparing environmental impacts of additive manufacturing vs traditional
machining via life-cycle assessment. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2015, 21, 14–33. [CrossRef]
15. Tofail, S.A.M.; Koumoulos, E.P.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Bose, S.; O’Donoghue, L.; Charitidis, C. Additive manufacturing: Scientific
and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 22–37. [CrossRef]
16. Mendible, G.A.; Rulander, J.A.; Johnston, S.P. Comparative study of rapid and conventional tooling for plastics injection moulding.
Rapid Prototyp. J. 2017, 23, 344–352. [CrossRef]
17. Altaf, K.; Rani, A.A.M.; Ahmad, F.; Baharom, M.; Raghavan, V.R. Determining the effects of thermal conductivity on epoxy
moulds using profiled cooling channels with metal inserts. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2016, 30, 4901–4907. [CrossRef]
18. Altaf, K.; Qayyum, J.A.; Rani, A.M.A.; Ahmad, F.; Megat-Yusoff, P.S.M.; Baharom, M.; Aziz, A.R.A.; Jahanzaib, M.; German,
R.M. Performance analysis of enhanced 3D printed polymer moulds for metal injection moulding process. Metals 2018, 8, 433.
[CrossRef]
19. Jain, P.; Kuthe, A. Feasibility study of manufacturing using rapid prototyping: FDM approach. Procedia Eng. 2013, 63, 4–11.
[CrossRef]
20. Thomas, P.A.; Aahlada, P.K.; Kiran, N.S.; Ivvala, J. A Review on Transition in the Manufacturing of Mechanical Components from
Conventional Techniques to Rapid Casting Using Rapid Prototyping. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 11990–12002. [CrossRef]
21. Krizsma, S.; Kovács, N.; Kovács, J.; Suplicz, A. In-situ monitoring of deformation in rapid prototyped injection moulds. Addit.
Manuf. 2021, 42, 102001. [CrossRef]
22. Török, D.; Zink, B.; Ageyeva, T.; Hatos, I.; Zobač, M.; Fekete, I.; Boros, R.; Hargitai, H.; Kovács, J.G. Laser powder bed fusion and
casting for an advanced hybrid prototype mould. J. Manuf. Process. 2022, 81, 748–758. [CrossRef]
23. Krizsma, S.; Suplicz, A. Comprehensive in-mould state monitoring of Material Jetting additively manufactured and machined
aluminium injection moulds. J. Manuf. Process. 2022, 84, 1298–1309. [CrossRef]
24. Zakrzewski, T.; Kozak, J.; Witt, M.; D˛ebowska-Wasak, ˛ M. Dimensional analysis of the effect of SLM parameters on surface
roughness and material density. Procedia CIRP 2020, 95, 115–120. [CrossRef]
25. Sarkar, P.; Modak, N.; Sahoo, P. Mechanical and Tribological Characteristics of Aluminium Powder filled Glass Epoxy Composites.
Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 5496–5505. [CrossRef]
26. De Carvalho Fernandes, A.; De Souza, A.F.; Howarth, J.L.L. Mechanical and dimensional characterisation of polypropylene
injection moulded parts in epoxy resin/aluminium inserts for rapid tooling. Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol. 2016, 52, 37–52. [CrossRef]
27. Srivastava, V.K.; Verma, A. Mechanical Behaviour of Copper and Aluminium Particles Reinforced Epoxy Resin Composites. Am.
J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 5, 84–89. [CrossRef]
28. Kalami, H.; Urbanic, R.J. Design and fabrication of a low-volume, high-temperature injection mould leveraging a ‘rapid tooling’
approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 105, 3797–3813. [CrossRef]
29. Tan, J.H.; Wong, W.L.E.; Dalgarno, K.W. An overview of powder granulometry on feedstock and part performance in the selective
laser melting process. Addit. Manuf. 2017, 18, 228–255. [CrossRef]
30. Enayati, M.H.; Bafandeh, M.R.; Nosohian, S. Ball milling of stainless steel scrap chips to produce nanocrystalline powder. J. Mater.
Sci. 2007, 42, 2844–2848. [CrossRef]
31. Radhwan, H.; Sharif, S.; Shayfull, Z.; Suhaimi, M.A.; l-hadj, A.; Khushairi, M.T.M. Thermal-Transient Analysis for Cooling Time
on New Formulation of Metal Epoxy Composite (MEC) as Mould Inserts. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 7483–7494. [CrossRef]
32. Kim, K.; Kim, K.; Kim, M. Characterization of municipal solid-waste incinerator fly ash, vitrified using only end-waste glass. J.
Clean Prod. 2021, 318, 128557. [CrossRef]
33. Jian, C.Y. The role of green manufacturing in reducing carbon dioxide emissions. In Proceedings of the 2013 5th Conference on
Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, ICMTMA, Hong Kong, China, 16–17 January 2013; Volume 2013, pp.
1223–1226. [CrossRef]
34. Gilmer, E.L.; Miller, D.; Chatham, C.A.; Zawaski, C.; Fallon, J.J.; Pekkanen, A.; Long, T.E.; Williams, C.B.; Bortner, M.J. Model
analysis of feedstock behavior in fused filament fabrication: Enabling rapid materials screening. Polymer 2018, 152, 51–61.
[CrossRef]
35. Colangelo, F.; Farina, I.; Travaglioni, M.; Salzano, C.; Cioffi, R.; Petrillo, A. Eco-efficient industrial waste recycling for the
manufacturing of fibre reinforced innovative geopolymer mortars: Integrated waste management and green product devel-
opment through LCA. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 312, 127777. [CrossRef]
36. Ahmad, A.; Leman, Z.; Azmir, M.; Muhamad, K.; Harun, W.; Juliawati, A.; Alias, A. Optimisation of warpage defect in in-jection
moulding process using ABS material. In Proceedings of the 2009 3rd Asia International Conference on Modelling and Simulation,
AMS, Bandung, Indonesia, 25–29 May 2009; Volume 2009, pp. 470–474. [CrossRef]
35
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
37. Bajpai, R.; Choudhary, K.; Srivastava, A.; Sangwan, K.S.; Singh, M. Environmental impact assessment of fly ash and silica fume
based geopolymer concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120147. [CrossRef]
38. Hussin, R.; Sharif, S.; Nabiałek, M.; Rahim, S.Z.A.; Khushairi, M.; Suhaimi, M.; Abdullah, M.; Hanid, M.; Wysłocki, J.; Błoch, K.
Hybrid mould: Comparative study of rapid and hard tooling for injection moulding application using metal epoxy composite
(MEC). Materials 2021, 14, 665. [CrossRef]
39. Altaf, K.; Rani, A.M.A.; Raghavan, V.R. Prototype production and experimental analysis for circular and profiled conformal
cooling channels in aluminium filled epoxy injection mould tools. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2013, 19, 220–229. [CrossRef]
40. Bin Hussin, R.; Bin Sharif, S.; Rahim, S.Z.B.A.; Bin Suhaimi, M.A.; Khushairi, M.T.B.M.; El-Hadj, A.A.; Bin Shuaib, N.A. The
potential of metal epoxy composite (MEC) as hybrid mould inserts in rapid tooling application: A review. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2021,
27, 1069–1100. [CrossRef]
41. Zulkifly, K.; Cheng-Yong, H.; Yun-Ming, L.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Shee-Ween, O.; Bin Khalid, M.S. Effect of phosphate addition on
room-temperature-cured fly ash-metakaolin blend geopolymers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 270, 121486. [CrossRef]
42. Söderholm, P.; Ekvall, T. Metal markets and recycling policies: Impacts and challenges. Miner. Econ. 2020, 33, 257–272. [CrossRef]
43. Anderson, I.E.; White, E.M.; Dehoff, R. Feedstock powder processing research needs for additive manufacturing development.
Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2018, 22, 8–15. [CrossRef]
44. Cacace, S.; Demir, A.G.; Semeraro, Q. Densification Mechanism for Different Types of Stainless Steel Powders in Selective Laser
Melting. Procedia CIRP 2017, 62, 475–480. [CrossRef]
45. Jacobson, L.A.; Mckittrick, J. A Review Journal Rapid solidification processing. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 1994, 11, 355–408.
[CrossRef]
46. Fullenwider, B.; Kiani, P.; Schoenung, J.; Ma, K. Two-stage ball milling of recycled machining chips to create an alternative
feedstock powder for metal additive manufacturing. Powder Technol. 2019, 342, 562–571. [CrossRef]
47. da Costa, C.E.; Zapata, W.C.; Parucker, M.L. Characterization of casting iron powder from recycled swarf. J. Mater. Process.
Technol. 2003, 143–144, 138–143. [CrossRef]
48. Afshari, E.; Ghambari, M. Characterization of pre-alloyed tin bronze powder prepared by recycling machining chips using jet
milling. Mater. Des. 2016, 103, 201–208. [CrossRef]
49. Witkin, D.; Lavernia, E. Synthesis and mechanical behavior of nanostructured materials via cryomilling. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2006, 51,
1–60. [CrossRef]
50. Ma, K.; Smith, T.; Lavernia, E.J.; Schoenung, J.M. Environmental Sustainability of Laser Metal Deposition: The Role of Feedstock
Powder and Feedstock Utilization Factor. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 7, 198–204. [CrossRef]
51. Park, Y.; Abolmaali, A.; Kim, Y.H.; Ghahremannejad, M. Compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with crumb
rubber partially replacing sand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 118, 43–51. [CrossRef]
52. Martinho, P.G.; Pouzada, A.S. Alternative materials in moulding elements of hybrid moulds: Structural integrity and tribo-logical
aspects. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 113, 351–363. [CrossRef]
53. Skousen, J.; Ziemkiewicz, P.F.; Yang, J.E. Use of coal combustion by-products in mine reclamation:Review of case studies in the
USA. Geosystem Eng. 2012, 15, 71–83. [CrossRef]
54. Li, J.; Zhuang, X.; Leiva, C.; Cornejo, A.; Font, O.; Querol, X.; Moeno, N.; Arenas, C.; Fernández-Pereira, C. Potential utilization
of FGD gypsum and fly ash from a Chinese power plant for manufacturing fire-resistant panels. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 95,
910–921. [CrossRef]
55. Shrestha, P. Development of Geopolymer Concrete for Precast Structures. Master’s Theses, University of Texas Arlington,
Arlington, TX, USA, 12 March 2014.
56. Turan, C.; Javadi, A.A.; Vinai, R. Effects of Class C and Class F Fly Ash on Mechanical and Microstructural Behavior of Clay
Soil—A Comparative Study. Materials 2022, 15, 1845. [CrossRef]
57. Sun, X.; Li, J.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, B.; Zhang, G. A Review on the Management of Municipal Solid Waste Fly Ash in American. Procedia
Environ. Sci. 2016, 31, 535–540. [CrossRef]
58. Sugiyama, S.; Mera, T.; Yanagimoto, J. Recycling of minute metal scraps by semisolid processing: Manufacturing of design
materials. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2010, 20, 1567–1571. [CrossRef]
59. Sharkawi, A.; Taman, M.; Afefy, H.M.; Hegazy, Y. Efficiency of geopolymer vs. high-strength grout as repairing material for
reinforced cementitious elements. Structures 2020, 27, 330–342. [CrossRef]
60. Diaz-Loya, I.; Juenger, M.; Seraj, S.; Minkara, R. Extending supplementary cementitious material resources: Reclaimed and
remediated fly ash and natural pozzolans. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 101, 44–51. [CrossRef]
61. Evans, J.C.; Piuzzi, G.P.; Ruffing, D.G. Assessment of Key Properties of Solidified Fly Ash with and without Sodium Sulfate.
Grouting 2017 2017, 197–206. [CrossRef]
62. Bakshi, R.; Ghassemi, A. Injection Experiments on Basaltic Tuffs under Triaxial and Heated Conditions with Acoustic Emissions
Monitoring. Rock Properties of Crystalline Basement and Control on Seismicity View Project Poroelasticity View Project. Master’s
Thesis, Mewbourne School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering, Norman, OK, USA, 26 June 2016.
63. Gorman, M.R.; Dzombak, D.A.; Frischmann, C. Potential global GHG emissions reduction from increased adoption of metals
recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 184, 106424. [CrossRef]
36
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
64. Kurniawan, T.A.; Maiurova, A.; Kustikova, M.; Bykovskaia, E.; Othman, M.H.D.; Goh, H.H. Accelerating sustainability transition
in St. Petersburg (Russia) through digitalization-based circular economy in waste recycling industry: A strategy to promote
carbon neutrality in era of Industry 4.0. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 363, 132452. [CrossRef]
65. Yamamoto, T.; Suzuki, M.; Waku, Y.; Tokuse, M. Fibre-Reinforced Metal Composite. U.S. Patent 4,980,242, 25 December 1990.
66. Behi, M.; Zedalis, M.; Schoonover, J.M. Rapid Manufacture of Metal and Ceramic Tooling. U.S. Patent 6,056,915, 2 May 2000.
67. Shaikh, F.Z.; Howard, T.; Blair, D.; Tsung-Yu, R. Low-Temperature, High-Strength Metal-Matrix Composite for Rapid-Prototyping
and Rapid-Tooling. U.S. Patent 6,376,098 B1, 23 April 2002.
68. Amaya, H.E.; Hills, V. Method for the Rapid Fabrication of Mould Inserts. U.S. Patent 2002/0187065 A1, 12 December 2002.
69. Nematollahi, B.; Sanjayan, J. Geopolymer Composite and Geopolymer Matrix Composition. U.S. Patent WO2017070748 A1, 5
April 2017.
70. Lin, X.Q.; Li, J.F.; Zhang, T.; Huo, L.; Li, G.Y.; Zhang, N.; Liao, J.; Wang, B.H.; Ji, W.Z. 3D Printed Geopolymer Composite Material,
Its Production and Applications. U.S. Patent CN106082898A, 31 July 2018.
71. Yang, Y.; Okonkwo, E.G.; Huang, G.; Xu, S.; Sun, W.; He, Y. On the sustainability of lithium ion battery industry—A review and
perspective. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 36, 186–212. [CrossRef]
72. Griffin, P.W.; Hammond, G.P.; Norman, J.B. Industrial energy use and carbon emissions reduction: A UK perspective. Wiley
Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 2016, 5, 684–714. [CrossRef]
73. Allwood, J.M.; Azevedo, J.; Clare, A.; Cleaver, C.; Cullen, J.; Dunant, C.; Fellin, T.; Hawkins, W.; Horrocks, I.; Horton, P.; et al.
Absolute Zero: Delivering the UK’s Climate Change Commitment with Incremental Changes to Today’s Technologies. Absolute
Zero 2019. Available online: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/299414/REP_Absolute_Zero_V3_20200
505.pdf?sequence=9Allowed=y (accessed on 18 November 2022).
74. Vijayakumar, S.R.; Gajendran, S. Improvement of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (Oee). Inject. Mould. Process Ind. 2014, 2, 47–60.
75. Chen, W.-C.; Kurniawan, D. Process parameters optimisation for multiple quality characteristics in plastic injection moulding
using Taguchi method, BPNN, GA, and hybrid PSO-GA. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2014, 15, 1583–1593. [CrossRef]
76. Singh, G.; Pradhan, M.; Verma, A. Multi Response optimisation of injection moulding Process parameters to reduce cycle time
and warpage. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 8398–8405. [CrossRef]
77. Zhao, N.-Y.; Lian, J.-Y.; Wang, P.-F.; Xu, Z.-B. Recent progress in minimizing the warpage and shrinkage deformations by the
optimisation of process parameters in plastic injection moulding: A review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 120, 85–101.
[CrossRef]
78. Zhao, J.; Cheng, G.; Ruan, S.; Li, Z. Multi-objective optimisation design of injection moulding process parameters based on the
improved efficient global optimisation algorithm and non-dominated sorting-based genetic algorithm. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
2015, 78, 1813–1826. [CrossRef]
79. Kashyap, S.; Datta, D. Process parameter optimisation of plastic injection moulding: A review. Int. J. Plast. Technol. 2015, 19, 1–18.
[CrossRef]
80. Mehat, N.M.; Kamaruddin, S. Multi-Response Optimisation of Injection Moulding Processing Parameters Using the Taguchi
Method. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2011, 50, 1519–1526. [CrossRef]
81. Shi, F.; Lou, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, J. Optimisation of Plastic Injection Moulding Process with Soft Computing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf.
Technol. 2003, 21, 656–661. [CrossRef]
82. Dimla, D.E.; Camilotto, M.; Miani, F. Design and optimisation of conformal cooling channels in injection moulding tools. J. Mater.
Process. Technol. 2005, 164–165, 1294–1300. [CrossRef]
83. Hatta, N.M. An Improved Grey Wolf Optimiser Sine Cosine Algorithm for Minimisation of Injection Moulding Shrinkage. Ph.D.
Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia, 2019.
84. Fu, J.; Ma, Y. A method to predict early-ejected plastic part air-cooling behavior towards quality mould design and less moulding
cycle time. Robot Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2019, 56, 66–74. [CrossRef]
85. Annicchiarico, D.; Alcock, J.R. Review of factors that affect shrinkage of moulded part in injection moulding. Mater. Manuf.
Process. 2014, 29, 662–682. [CrossRef]
86. Mancini, S.D.; Zanin, M. Recyclability of PET from virgin resin. Mater. Res. 1999, 2, 33–38. [CrossRef]
87. Abbasalizadeh, M.; Hasanzadeh, R.; Mohamadian, Z.; Azdast, T.; Rostami, M. Experimental study to optimize shrinkage behavior
of semi-crystalline and amorphous thermoplastics. Iran. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 15, 41–45. [CrossRef]
88. Chen, C.-P.; Chuang, M.-T.; Hsiao, Y.-H.; Yang, Y.-K.; Tsai, C.-H. Simulation and experimental study in determining injection
moulding process parameters for thin-shell plastic parts via design of experiments analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36,
10752–10759. [CrossRef]
89. Tang, C.; Tan, J.; Wong, C. A numerical investigation on the physical mechanisms of single track defects in selective laser melting.
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2018, 126, 957–968. [CrossRef]
90. Shoemaker, J. Mouldflow Design Guide: A Resource for Plastics Engineers; Hanser: Munich, Germany, 2006; p. 409.
91. Ibrahim, A.A.; Khalil, T.; Tawfeek, T. Study the influence of a new ball burnishing technique on the surface roughness of AISI
1018 low carbon steel. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2015, 4, 227. [CrossRef]
92. Selvaraj, S.; Venkataramaiah, P. Design and fabrication of an injection moulding tool for cam bush with baffle cooling channel and
submarine gate. Procedia Eng. 2013, 64, 1310–1319. [CrossRef]
93. Højerslev, C.; Risø, F. Tool Steels; Risø National Laboratory: Roskilde, Denmark, 2001.
37
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
94. Sandanayake, M.; Gunasekara, C.; Law, D.; Zhang, G.; Setunge, S.; Wanijuru, D. Sustainable criterion selection framework for
green building materials—An optimisation based study of fly-ash Geopolymer concrete. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2020, 25, e00178.
[CrossRef]
95. Rahmati, S.; Dickens, P. Rapid tooling analysis of Stereolithography injection mould tooling. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2007, 47,
740–747. [CrossRef]
96. Beal, V.E.; Erasenthiran, P.; Ahrens, C.H.; Dickens, P. Evaluating the use of functionally graded materials inserts produced by
selective laser melting on the injection moulding of plastics parts. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B J. Eng. Manuf. 2007, 221, 945–954.
[CrossRef]
97. Yadroitsev, I.; Krakhmalev, P.; Yadroitsava, I. Hierarchical design principles of selective laser melting for high quality metallic
objects. Addit. Manuf. 2015, 7, 45–56. [CrossRef]
98. Reddy, K.P.; Panitapu, B. High thermal conductivity mould insert materials for cooling time reduction in thermoplastic injection
moulds. Mater. Today Proc. 2017, 4, 519–526. [CrossRef]
99. Sanap, P.; Dharmadhikari, H.M.; Keche, A.J. Optimisation of Plastic Moulding by Reducing Warpage with the Application of
Taguchi Optimisation Technique & Addition of Ribs in Washing Machine Wash Lid Component. IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng. 2016, 13,
61–68. [CrossRef]
100. 100. Pontes, A.J.; Queirós, M.P.; Martinho, P.G.; Bártolo, P.J.; Pouzada, A.S. Experimental assessment of hybrid mould performance.
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010, 50, 441–448. [CrossRef]
101. Ferreira, J.; Mateus, A. Studies of rapid soft tooling with conformal cooling channels for plastic injection moulding. J. Mater.
Process. Technol. 2003, 142, 508–516. [CrossRef]
102. Ong, H.; Chua, C.; Cheah, C. Rapid Moulding Using Epoxy Tooling Resin. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2002, 20, 368–374.
[CrossRef]
103. Ma, S.; Gibson, I.; Balaji, G.; Hu, Q. Development of epoxy matrix composites for rapid tooling applications. J. Mater. Process.
Technol. 2007, 192–193, 75–82. [CrossRef]
104. Pozzo, A.D.; Carabba, L.; Bignozzi, M.C.; Tugnoli, A. Life cycle assessment of a geopolymer mixture for fireproofing applica-tions.
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2019, 24, 1743–1757. [CrossRef]
105. Kuo, C.-C.; Tasi, Q.-Z.; Hunag, S.-H. Development of an Epoxy-Based Rapid Tool with Low Vulcanization Energy Con-sumption
Channels for Liquid Silicone Rubber Injection Moulding. Polymers 2022, 14, 4534. [CrossRef]
106. Hopkinson, N.; Dickens, P. A comparison between stereolithography and aluminium injection moulding tooling. Rapid Prototyp.
J. 2000, 6, 253–258. [CrossRef]
107. Ferreira, J.C. Manufacturing core-boxes for foundry with rapid tooling technology. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2004, 155–156,
1118–1123. [CrossRef]
108. Polytechnica, P.; Eng, S.M. Influence of Mould Properties on the Quality of Injection Moulded Parts. Period. Polytech. Mech. Eng.
2005, 49, 115–122.
109. Rossi, S.; Deflorian, F.; Venturini, F. Improvement of surface finishing and corrosion resistance of prototypes produced by direct
metal laser sintering. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2004, 148, 301–309. [CrossRef]
110. Tomori, T.; Melkote, S.; Kotnis, M. Injection mould performance of machined ceramic filled epoxy tooling boards. J. Mater. Process.
Technol. 2004, 145, 126–133. [CrossRef]
111. Senthilkumar, N.; Kalaichelvan, K.; Elangovan, K. Mechanical behaviour of aluminum particulate epoxy compo-site-experimental
study and numerical simulation. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng. 2012, 7, 214–221.
112. Khushairi, M.T.M.; Sharif, S.; Jamaludin, K.R.; Mohruni, A.S. Effects of Metal Fillers on Properties of Epoxy for Rapid Tooling
Inserts. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2017, 7, 1155. [CrossRef]
113. Kuo, C.-C.; Lin, J.-X. Fabrication of the Fresnel lens with liquid silicone rubber using rapid injection mould. Int. J. Adv. Manuf.
Technol. 2019, 101, 15–625. [CrossRef]
114. Burduhos Nergis, D.D.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Vizureanu, P.; Faheem, M.T.M. Geopolymers and Their Uses: Review. IOP Conf. Ser.
Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 374, 012019. [CrossRef]
115. Amritphale, S.S.; Bhardwaj, P.; Gupta, R. Advanced Geopolymerization Technology. In Geopolymers and Other Geosynthetics;
IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [CrossRef]
116. Mehta, A.; Siddique, R. An overview of geopolymers derived from industrial by-products. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 127, 183–198.
[CrossRef]
117. Mehta, A.; Siddique, R.; Ozbakkaloglu, T.; Shaikh, F.U.A.; Belarbi, R. Fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag-based
alkali-activated concrete: Mechanical, transport and microstructural properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 257, 119548. [CrossRef]
118. Nguyen, T.T.; Goodier, C.I.; Austin, S.A. Factors affecting the slump and strength development of geopolymer concrete. Constr.
Build. Mater. 2020, 261, 119945. [CrossRef]
119. Wardhono, A.; Gunasekara, C.; Law, D.W.; Setunge, S. Comparison of long term performance between alkali activated slag and
fly ash geopolymer concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 143, 272–279. [CrossRef]
120. Cao, V.D.; Bui, T.Q.; Kjøniksen, A.-L. Thermal analysis of multi-layer walls containing geopolymer concrete and phase change
materials for building applications. Energy 2019, 186, 115792. [CrossRef]
121. Nurruddin, E.A. Methods of curing geopolymer concrete: A review. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 2018, 5, 31–36. [CrossRef]
38
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
122. Ridzuan, A.R.M.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Arshad, M.F.; Tahir, M.F.M.; Khairulniza, A. The effect of NaOH concentration and curing
condition to the strength and shrinkage performance of recycled geopolymer concrete. Mater. Sci. Forum 2015, 803, 194–200.
[CrossRef]
123. Riahi, S.; Nazari, A. The effects of nanoparticles on early age compressive strength of ash-based geopolymers. Ceram. Int. 2012,
38, 4467–4476. [CrossRef]
124. Castel, A.; Foster, S.J. Bond strength between blended slag and Class F fly ash geopolymer concrete with steel reinforcement. Cem.
Concr. Res. 2015, 72, 48–53. [CrossRef]
125. Deb, P.S.; Nath, P.; Sarker, P.K. The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash and activator content
on the workability and strength properties of geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Mater. Des. 2014, 62, 32–39.
[CrossRef]
126. Krishnan, T.; Purushothaman, R. Optimisation and influence of parameter affecting the compressive strength of geopolymer
concrete containing recycled concrete aggregate: Using full factorial design approach. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2017, 80, 1.
[CrossRef]
127. Vora, P.R.; Dave, U.V. Parametric studies on compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Procedia Eng. 2013, 51, 210–219.
[CrossRef]
128. Dao, D.V.; Ly, H.-B.; Trinh, S.H.; Le, T.-T.; Pham, B.T. Artificial intelligence approaches for prediction of compressive strength of
geopolymer concrete. Materials 2019, 12, 983. [CrossRef]
129. Aredes, F.; Campos, T.; Machado, J.; Sakane, K.; Thim, G.; Brunelli, D. Effect of cure temperature on the formation of me-
takaolinite-based geopolymer. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 7302–7311. [CrossRef]
130. Nguyen, K.T.; Nguyen, Q.D.; Le, T.A.; Shin, J.; Lee, K. Analyzing the compressive strength of green fly ash based geopolymer
concrete using experiment and machine learning approaches. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 247, 118581. [CrossRef]
131. Girish, M.G.; Shetty, K.K.; Rao, A.R. Geopolymer Concrete an Eco-Friendly Alternative to Portland Cement Paving Grade
Concrete. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2017, 8, 886–892.
132. Girish, M.G.; Shetty, K.K.; Raja, A.R. Self-Consolidating Paving Grade Geopolymer Concrete. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018,
431, 092006. [CrossRef]
133. Izzati, Z.N.; Al-Bakri, A.M.; Salleh, M.A.A.M.; Ahmad, R.; Mortar, N.A.M.; Ramasamy, S. Microstructure and Mechanical
Properties of Geopolymer Ceramic Reinforced Sn-0. 7Cu Solder. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 864, 012041. [CrossRef]
134. Hussein, S.S.; Fawzi, N.M. Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Reinforced by Sustainable Copper Fibre. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth
Environ. Sci. 2021, 856, 012022. [CrossRef]
135. Hussein, S.S.; Fawzi, N.M. Influence of Using Various Percentages of Slag on Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash-based Geo-polymer
Concrete. J. Eng. 2021, 27, 50–67. [CrossRef]
136. Morsy, M.S.; Alsayed, S.H.; Al-Salloum, Y.; Almusallam, T.H. Effect of Sodium Silicate to Sodium Hydroxide Ratios on Strength
and Microstructure of Fly Ash Geopolymer Binder. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2014, 39, 4333–4339. [CrossRef]
137. Liyana, J.; Al Bakri, A.M.M.; Hussin, K.; Ruzaidi, C.; Azura, A.R. Effect of fly ash/alkaline activator ratio and sodium sili-
cate/NaoH ratio on fly ash geopolymer coating strength. Key Eng. Mater. 2014, 594–595, 146–150. [CrossRef]
138. Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Kamarudin, H.; Nizar, I.K.; Bnhussain, M.; Zarina, Y.; Rafiza, A. Correlation between Na2SiO3/NaOH ratio
and fly ash/alkaline activator ratio to the strength of geopolymer. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 341–342, 189–193. [CrossRef]
139. Niş, A. Compressive strength variation of alkali activated fly ash/slag concrete with different NaOH concentrations and so-dium
silicate to sodium hydroxide ratios. J. Sustain. Constr. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 351–360. [CrossRef]
140. Abdullah, M.M.A.; Kamarudin, H.; Bnhussain, M.; Nizar, I.K.; Rafiza, A.; Zarina, Y. The relationship of NaOH molarity,
Na2SiO3/NaOH ratio, fly ash/alkaline activator ratio, and curing temperature to the strength of fly ash-based geopolymer. Adv.
Mater. Res. 2011, 328–330, 1475–1482. [CrossRef]
141. Das, S.K.; Shrivastava, S. Influence of molarity and alkali mixture ratio on ambient temperature cured waste cement concrete
based geopolymer mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 301, 124380. [CrossRef]
142. Parthasarathy, P.; Srinivasula, R.M.; Dinakar, P.; Rao, B.K.; Satpathy, B.N.; Mohanty, A. Effect of Na2 SiO3/NaOH Ratios and
NaOH Molarities on Compressive Strength of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer. Geo-Chicago 2016 2012, 109, 503. [CrossRef]
143. Ryu, G.S.; Lee, Y.B.; Koh, K.T.; Chung, Y.S. The mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with alkaline
activators. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 47, 409–418. [CrossRef]
144. Lee, N.; Lee, H. Setting and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag concrete manufactured at room temperature.
Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 47, 1201–1209. [CrossRef]
145. Rathanasalam, V.; Perumalsami, J.; Jayakumar, K. Characteristics of blended geopolymer concrete using ultrafine ground
granulated blast furnace slag and copper slag. Ann. Chim. Sci. Des. Mater. 2020, 44, 433–439. [CrossRef]
146. Rathanasalam, V.; Perumalsami, J.; Jayakumar, K. Design and development of sustainable geopolymer using industrial copper
byproduct. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123565. [CrossRef]
147. Fakhrabadi, A.; Ghadakpour, M.; Choobbasti, A.J.; Kutanaei, S.S. Evaluating the durability, microstructure and mechanical
properties of a clayey-sandy soil stabilized with copper slag-based geopolymer against wetting-drying cycles. Bull. Eng. Geol.
Environ. 2021, 80, 5031–5051. [CrossRef]
39
Materials 2023, 16, 1724
148. Saha, S.; Rajasekaran, C. Enhancement of the properties of fly ash based geopolymer paste by incorporating ground granulated
blast furnace slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 146, 615–620. [CrossRef]
149. Temuujin, J.; Williams, R.; van Riessen, A. Effect of mechanical activation of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer cured at
ambient temperature. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209, 5276–5280. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
40
materials
Article
Experimental Study on Toughness of Engineered Cementitious
Composites with Desert Sand
Zhishuan Lv 1 , Yang Han 1,2, *, Guoqi Han 1 , Xueyu Ge 1 and Hao Wang 1
1 College of Civil Engineering, Kashi University, Kashi 844008, China; [email protected] (Z.L.);
[email protected] (G.H.); [email protected] (X.G.); [email protected] (H.W.)
2 Institute of Engineering Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Henan University of Technology,
Zhengzhou 450001, China
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-186-2371-7360
Abstract: In this paper, engineered cementitious composites (ECCs) were prepared with desert sand
instead of ordinary sand, and the toughness properties of the ECCs were studied. The particle size of
the desert sand was 0.075–0.3 mm, which is defined as ultrafine sand. The ordinary sand was sieved
into one control group with a size of 0.075–0.3 mm and three other reference groups. Together with the
desert sand group, a total of five groups of ECC specimens were created. Through a uniaxial tensile
test, three-point bending test and single-seam tensile test on the ECC specimens, the influence of
aggregate particle size and sand type on the ECC tensile strength, deformation capacity, initial crack
strength, cement-matrix-fracture toughness, multiple cracking characteristics and strain-hardening
properties were studied. The experimental results show that the 28d tensile strain of the four groups
of the ordinary sand specimens was 8.13%, 4.37%, 4.51% and 4.23%, respectively, which exceeded 2%
and satisfied the requirements for the minimum strain of the ECCs. It is easier to achieve the ECC
strain hardening with sand with a fine particle size; thus, a particle size below 0.3 mm is preferred
when preparing the ECCs to achieve a high toughness. The multiple cracking performance (MCP) and
the pseudostrain hardening (PSH) of desert sand and ordinary sand with a 0.075–0.3 mm grain size
were 2.88 and 2.33, and 8.76 and 8.17, respectively, all of which meet the strength criteria and energy
criteria and have similar properties. The tensile strength and tensile deformation of the desert sand
Citation: Lv, Z.; Han, Y.; Han, G.; Ge, group were 4.97 MPa and 6.78%, respectively, and the deformation capacity and strain–strengthening
X.; Wang, H. Experimental Study on performance were outstanding. It is verified that it is feasible to use desert sand instead of ordinary
Toughness of Engineered sand to prepare the ECCs.
Cementitious Composites with
Desert Sand. Materials 2023, 16, 697.
Keywords: desert sand; engineered cementitious composites (ECCs); particle size; uniaxial tension;
https://doi.org/10.3390/
toughness
ma16020697
41
Materials 2023, 16, 697
on these two criteria was provided for the engineering application of the ECCs [3–5]. If
both the strength criteria and the energy criteria are satisfied, the characteristics of the
multiple cracking and strain hardening of the ECCs under tension can be realized. The
uniaxial tensile strain of the ECCs can exceed 2% [6–8], which is more than 200 times that
of ordinary cement-based materials [9]. In the failure process for the ECCs, many fine
cracks are produced with a crack width that is generally within 100 μm [10–12], and the
invasion of harmful substances can effectively be prevented and the impermeability [13–15],
self-healing ability [16–18] and durability [19–22] of concrete can be improved. The research
on the ECCs from different perspectives and in combination with different factors has been
conducted by scholars all over the world [23–26].
A large number of industrial wastes are used in the ECC preparation process to replace
some or all of the cement, such as fly ash, slag, lithium slag and red-mud slag [27–31],
and the energy consumption of the material-production process is greatly reduced, which
conforms to the goal of achieving environmental sustainability [32]. Aggregates are an
important component of the ECCs, which account for a large volume proportion and
significantly affect the workability, strength, elastic modulus, ductility and other properties
of the ECCs. In addition, aggregates can also reduce the production costs of the ECCs. At
present, most ECCs are made of micro-silica sand from river sand, which is a nonrenewable
resource. Because of the surge in demand for building raw materials, China uses approxi-
mately 20 billion tons of sand and stone every year, which account for half of the world’s
consumption. The phenomenon of indiscriminate excavation and mining frequently occurs,
which has caused great damage to the environment and has led to a sharp increase in the
price of materials, such as construction sand, and a decrease in sand reserves [33]. Today,
ECCs cannot be widely used in practical projects due to their high cost, and the existing
research on reducing ECC costs has focused on the optimization and selection of fibers.
However, the micro-silica sand used in the ECCs is also one of the important reasons for
the high cost. Thus, finding new and alternative sand sources is important and urgent.
Desert sand is a very rich natural resource, which is widely distributed all over the
world. The total desert area in China is approximately 700,000 km2 , which accounts for 7%
of its total land area. China has eight deserts with huge reserves of desert sand [34]. Desert
sand is ultrafine sand with an average particle size generally below 0.2 mm. Currently,
it is used in some concrete materials [35–38]; however, the use of desert sand in ECCs is
rarely reported. If desert sand can be reasonably used in ECC materials, it will not only
reduce engineering costs, but also protect environmental resources and help achieve the
sustainable development of concrete.
Based on the above research contents, firstly, the chemical composition of the desert
sand is tested to determine whether it contains harmful elements that can affect ECCs.
Secondly, ECCs are prepared with desert sand, which are then compared with the ECCs
of ordinary sand with different particle sizes. Through a uniaxial tensile test, three-point
bending test and single-seam tensile test on the ECC specimens, the influences of desert
sand and ordinary sand with different grain sizes on the ECC tensile strength, deformation
capacity, initial crack strength, cement-matrix-fracture toughness, multiple cracking charac-
teristics and strain-hardening properties were studied. The schematic flow diagram of this
study is shown in Figure 1.
42
Materials 2023, 16, 697
PP PP
(d) (e)
Figure 2. Desert sand and ordinary sand: (a) Group A, 0.075–0.3 mm; (b) Group B, 0.075–0.3 mm;
(c) Group C, 0.3–0.6 mm; (d) Group D, 0.6–1.18 mm; (e) Group E, 0.075–1.18 mm.
43
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Fromont
nuorempi ja Risler vanhempi: Parisin tapoja
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.
Language: Finnish
FROMONT NUOREMPI JA
RISLER VANHEMPI
Parisin tapoja
Kirj.
ALPHONSE DAUDET
Pietarissa.
Anton Lindeberg'in kustannuksella.
Toinen kirja:
I. Vaimoni vastaanottopäivä.
II. Oikea ja väärä helmi.
III. Blondelkadun olutmyymälä.
IV. Savignyssa.
V. Sigmund Planus vapisee kassansa tähden.
VI. Tili.
VII. Kirje.
Kolmas kirja:
I. Tuomari.
II. Selitys.
III. Pikku neiti Sisi rukka.
IV. Odotussali.
V. Sanomissa.
VI. Hän lupasi olla sitä enää tekemättä.
Neljäs kirja:
I. Tarina pienestä sini-miehestä.
II. Havaintoja.
III. Maksupäivä!…
IV. Fromont'in huoneen uusi kauppapalvelija.
V. Café chantant.
VI. Sidonien kosto.
ESIPUHE.
Vielä tärkeämpi huomio tuli tämän kirjan osaksi sen kautta, että
Ranskan akademia kokouksessaan 10 p, Kesäkuuta v. 1875
yksimielisesti päätti antaa sen tekijälle palkinnon, määrätyn
parhaimmasta vuoden kuluessa ilmestyneestä teoksesta, joka kuvaa
Parisin tapoja. Tämän palkinnon, joka silloin ensi kerran annettiin,
sai hra Alphonse Daudet romaanistaan nimellä "Fromont jeune et
Risler aîné."
Suomentaja.
ENSIMMÄINEN KIRJA.
I.
— Rouva Chèbe!
— Poikani…
Porraslavan ikkuna!…
Kun pikku, Chèbe piti kovin paljon melua kotona, sanoi hänelle
äitinsä: "Ole tuossa jo minua vaivaamatta… mene leikkimään
portaille." Ja lapsi juoksi sinne hyvin sukkelaan.
Kauan, hyvin kauan oli herra Chèbe hakenut paikkaa, josta riittäisi
vähän lisää heidän pieniin korkojäännöksiinsä. Mutta hän etsikin
vaan semmoista paikkaa, jota hän kutsui kaupaksi seisoallaan, sillä
hänen terveytensä, näet, oli kaikkia istuvia toimia vastaan.
Toiseen oli neljällä naulalla lyöty käymäkortti, jossa oli nimi "Risler,
tehtaan piirustaja." Toisella oli pieni sahviaani nahka-palanen ja siinä
kultakirjaimilla:
ROUVA DELOBELLE, lintuja ja kärpäsiä
kuoseiksi.
Äiti teki työtä tyttärensä johdolla; sillä Désiréellä, vaikka hän olikin
vielä ihan nuori, oli oiva aisti, tenhottaren kekseliäisyys, eikä kukaan
osannut niinkuin hän, asetella silmiä lintujen pikku päihin ja levittää
niiden kangistuneita siipiä.
Hän ajatteli, että kaikki nuo pienet siivet lähtivät lentoon hänen
liikkumattomalta pöydältään oikeille matkustuksille Parisin maailman
ympäri tuikkimaan juhlissa, ruunujen valossa; ja yksin hänen
tavastaan asetella kärpäsiään ja lintujaan olisi voinut arvata hänen
ajatustensa suunnan. Alakuloisuuden ja murheen päivinä,
kuroittuivat suipot nokat eteenpäin, siivet levisivät ihan auki,
ikäänkuin ottaakseen huiman vauhdin lentääkseen kauas, hyvin
kau'as pois viidennen kerroksen asunnoista, puutteen alaisuutta ja
kurjuutta pakoon. Vaan kun hän joskus taas oli tyytyväinen, niin
näyttivätpä hänen eläväisensäkin elämään ihastuneilta, olivatpa
oikein pienten oikullisten ja rajujen kuosilintujen näköisiä.
Onneksi oli käsillä kelpo Risler, joka aina oli valmiit auttamaan
ystäviään.
Vilho Risler, kolmas asujain portailla, oli elänyt siinä noin viisitoista
vuotta nuoremman veljensä Franssin kanssa. Molemmat,
suurikasvuiset, rotevat, valkoveriset Schveitsiläiset olivat tuoneet
mukanaan himmeän työhuoneensa tukehduttavaan ilmaan maa-
elämän terveyden ja raittiuden. Vanhempi oli piirustaja Fromont'in
tehtaalla ja kustansi veljeään, joka kuunteli Chaptal'in luentoja
tullakseen Centralikouluun.
ebookbell.com